Kernal Suggestion - Micromax A110

I m on Kernal 3.4.5. i m pretty satisfied with it on 4.2.1
should i move to 3.4.70 or stay on 3.4.5
it is obvious 3.4.70 will have more features than 3.4.5 but i m getting best battery backup on 3.4.5
any suggestions?

saadtariq73 said:
I m on Kernal 3.4.5. i m pretty satisfied with it on 4.2.1
should i move to 3.4.70 or stay on 3.4.5
it is obvious 3.4.70 will have more features than 3.4.5 but i m getting best battery backup on 3.4.5
any suggestions?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
please don't discuss about this kernel on xda which is banned due to gpl. it is against the xda rules now .. though u can use other ways .

gaurav247star said:
please don't discuss about this kernel on xda which is banned due to gpl. it is against the xda rules now .. though u can use other ways .
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i m aware of the rules thatswhy i havent mentioned the name of kernal. just wanted to know the best kernal version

saadtariq73 said:
i m aware of the rules thatswhy i havent mentioned the name of kernal. just wanted to know the best kernal version
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And exactly how am I supposed to interpret this????
Seriously, there are open kernel threads in A110 Original Development and there are the MMX stock kernel threads. Almost everything else is going to cause trouble.
Please, don't try to skate around the rules...

Related

Value Pack

Hey guys.
Can somebody tell which ist the right Value Pack for my SL?
I was on cm9 alpha11 but my phone was on bootloop so i has to go to stock rom.My version is xxkpu.Post please a link for it an for the cf-root too or a kernel which i can take for it.
Thanks alot
DDLF2 value pack is the best untill now smooth n good battery life try it
i´m now on the xxle4.Is there even a cf-root or a rooted kernel which i can take?
ollivong said:
i´m now on the xxle4.Is there even a cf-root or a rooted kernel which i can take?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I replied with a link on one of the many posts you made for this request. Please look there and install.
Also, kindly refrain from making multiple posts for the same request.

Problem Encounter in [Kernel][ICS][CWM] ardatdat ICS kernel 4.0 (released!)

hi Im new user of XDA. i tried to install ardatdat ICS kernel 4.0. after flash the kernel in CWM and reboot, the phone does not switch on. Its hang at opening "Samsung Galaxy R GT-I9103". kindly help me to solve this problem
NewbieGalaxyR said:
hi Im new user of XDA. i tried to install ardatdat ICS kernel 4.0. after flash the kernel in CWM and reboot, the phone does not switch on. Its hang at opening "Samsung Galaxy R GT-I9103". kindly help me to solve this problem
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Have you taken CWM backup before flashing Ardatdat's kernel...
Hope you have flashed it on ICS only..
mj.vikram said:
Have you taken CWM backup before flashing Ardatdat's kernel...
Hope you have flashed it on ICS only..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
NewbieGalaxyR said:
hi Im new user of XDA. i tried to install ardatdat ICS kernel 4.0. after flash the kernel in CWM and reboot, the phone does not switch on. Its hang at opening "Samsung Galaxy R GT-I9103". kindly help me to solve this problem
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hey MJ, I think this can be discussed over ardatdat thread.. @NewbieGalaxyR: buddy you can ask whatever problem is coming to your device due to Devs development. so please ask to Ardatdat thread for kernel.
Reported to Justin for this thread.
First of all this issues should be posted to kernel thread there is no need to create whole new topic for just a single issue.
Btw have u wiped data from CWM before flashing ardatdat kernel?
Try to boot in recovery mod if u r unable to boot in recovery than there are chances that its a brick.
If ur phone is booting in recovery mod than DONT RESTORE CWM BACKUP. U are having stock kernel and restoring nand backup is dangerous.
I suggest to donwload official ICS (from sammobile, see dev section for links) and flash it through Odin, than flash CWM and flash ardatdat kernel it will work fine.
Sent from my Galaxy Royale using Tapatalk 2.
xlm13x said:
First of all this issues should be posted to kernel thread there is no need to create whole new topic for just a single issue.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think he is new user so he can not post it in Dev section, so he have posted it here....
mj.vikram said:
I think he is new user so he can not post it in Dev section, so he have posted it here....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nice Catch MJ..
mj.vikram said:
I think he is new user so he can not post it in Dev section, so he have posted it here....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There are lot of threads regarding these that how to be new user and not a noob. (like one made by mf in my sig) also we have sticky made by cooleagle regarding where to post. New users should read it first before posting.
Sent from my Galaxy Royale using Tapatalk 2.
This is okay guys. I'm happy with either:
a) a thread in General asking the question; or
b) a post in the respective thread.
In my ideal world, the kernel thread itself would contain nothing but the initial release and changelogs, and be closed after two posts (meaning people could only 'thank' the release, not post their thanks). All other discussion/praise/moaning/bug reports would be in a kernel Q&A thread in here, with one for each kernel/ROM available.
So I don't really mind seeing new topics for questions, so long as they are questions which haven't been answered time-and-time again.
Thanks for the heads-up and diligence though, I appreciate it greatly
Justin
Thank you Justin the way you are handling this Forum is really great....
@NewbieGalaxyR please make sure from next time you follow the XDA Rules...
juzz86 said:
This is okay guys. I'm happy with either:
a) a thread in General asking the question; or
b) a post in the respective thread.
In my ideal world, the kernel thread itself would contain nothing but the initial release and changelogs, and be closed after two posts (meaning people could only 'thank' the release, not post their thanks). All other discussion/praise/moaning/bug reports would be in a kernel Q&A thread in here, with one for each kernel/ROM available.
So I don't really mind seeing new topics for questions, so long as they are questions which haven't been answered time-and-time again.
Thanks for the heads-up and diligence though, I appreciate it greatly
Justin
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
can we have now have a Q&A section...?
because with the release of ICS, there would be definitely a lot of newbies and ppl who would ask such Quest..
hope you understand...!!
Deeply thanks everyone for answering questions for me.
I do not always have time to keep refreshing the forum, but I will not hesitate to answer any questions within my knowledge
ardatdat said:
Deeply thanks everyone for answering questions for me.
I do not always have time to keep refreshing the forum, but I will not hesitate to answer any questions within my knowledge
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
U just keep deving. there are many helpful users in our forum who can shootout problems.
U have very busy job yet u manage to dev our device is really a great contribution from ur side. :thumbup:
Sent from my Galaxy Royale using Tapatalk 2.
xlm13x said:
U just keep deving. there are many helpful users in our forum who can shootout problems.
U have very busy job yet u manage to dev our device is really a great contribution from ur side. :thumbup:
Sent from my Galaxy Royale using Tapatalk 2.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks mate, you are the one who understand me :good:

Ace plus jb discussion

hey ace+'s
this is the a jb discussion thread for ace plus
reserved
well im discussing 1st here , to inspire some noobs to make roms
well adding features is secondary , but cooking a rom must be known for that i advice the guide given by lokesh it would help every noob
porting is later but you should know to cook rom from kitchen
I thought S7500's was the same case as S5830's regarding the "L" thing...
In S5830L it means it's distributed in Latin America, but hardware is the same as S5830. The official CM for Galaxy Ace (cooper) is for S5830. I still have S5830L, installed CM on it and it worked. Only thing is, it changed the device name from S5830L to S5830. And also I asked that because since I live in Latin America the only Ace Plus I can get is S7500L.
Are you actually porting from Xperia instead of building?
And where can I find the S7500L kernel repository you ask?
thats change in build.prop u can make again L
and without kernel mods it may work on ur mob
So, if this ends working all, can you make one for S7500L? Or can I just use the current one one for L?
ctcx said:
So, if this ends working all, can you make one for S7500L? Or can I just use the current one one for L?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
let the kernel be made 1st
I'm just curious, why did you mention looking for Xperia applications or kind of? Are you porting instead of building?
HI??
Anything new , or same things (
Please share progress with us please
:silly::silly::silly::silly:
blinqipa said:
Anything new , or same things (
Please share progress with us please
:silly::silly::silly::silly:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
current progress
a team mate is not online with us
a kernel expert (he know to properly setup sources and me cant do anything related to kernel)
roms is to be modded little
it may take time 1-2 months
as im having final exams on 22nd of this month
and my mates are preparing custom roms for you all
be satisfied still with stock based custom roms
a new rom named IMAGINIX (based on xperia is coming)
ctcx said:
I'm just curious, why did you mention looking for Xperia applications or kind of? Are you porting instead of building?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
hey i said 100 times im releasing a rom based like xperia
you get me huuuh
its not cm10
cm10 later will take much time
update im taking a risk im gonna create a kernel that has posiibility to boot as well as brick
will update again in 2days
Since Mini 2 is running on the same chip, the kernel for Mini 2 is also compatible with Ace Plus. I just needs an updated defconfig.
Someone on Ace Plus do:
Code:
adb pull /proc/config.gz
Upload the file somewhere and post the link here. I will make a defconfig so you can build kernel.
ohh thanx bro
wait for 2 days
as my modem is off
n i cybercafe doesnt have even a single pc with ubuntu
and lol look at your thanx meter its bursting
amanmehta007 said:
ohh thanx bro
wait for 2 days
as my modem is off
n i cybercafe doesnt have even a single pc with ubuntu
and lol look at your thanx meter its bursting
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You are onLine now , give that thing config.etcetc to TheWhisp , why do you waittttt
Any news , any progresssssss
you don't give any progress to uss
Re: Ace plus discussion
Hey I gav
And wait for sometime
N don't ask for eta
sent from my sgy or ace plus or or arc s or smart tab 9 or laptop
Will the new kernel be able to support overclocking?
danielmih said:
Will the new kernel be able to support overclocking?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
noo
What "official sources" do you need in order for CM10 kernel to support overclocking? (I could use my time to look for it since I'm just a useless user....)
That'd be an almost imperative feature, and if you say "make it yourself and f*** off", well, sorry for not being developers like you (registration on this site should be restricted to dev-only...); or also that's why you *are* the devs and are announcing this possible work so we are indeed allowed to expect things from you...
Or, sorry for not being A D U L T devs like you. I can't express what I think about most of adults (most, not all) here because of the forum rules......
Thanks.
ctcx said:
What "official sources" do you need in order for CM10 kernel to support overclocking? (I could use my time to look for it since I'm just a useless user....)
That'd be an almost imperative feature, and if you say "make it yourself and f*** off", well, sorry for not being developers like you (registration on this site should be restricted to dev-only...); or also that's why you *are* the devs and are announcing this possible work so we are indeed allowed to expect things from you...
Or, sorry for not being A D U L T devs like you. I can't express what I think about most of adults (most, not all) here because of the forum rules......
Thanks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
well overclocking is possible
we will look into it later first we are trying making kernel stable
and control yoour self
he asked will the 1st versio support oc
thats not possible because we want to boot perfectly (thats possible when we make a kernel with no tweaks and few mods)

new skyrocket owner questins

hi in a cople of days i should have my skyrocket .. i have a few questions
i think i will change rom i knoe there should be a best rom question but can you piont me out to one great in performance speeed ...
second i have ace galaxy and had to do s2d to move stuff to memory do i need to do that or just slap my memory an am good to go...
thanks
This should have been posted in q&a. Read this and it will answer your questions http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=29080999
jd1639 said:
This should have been posted in q&a. Read this and it will answer your questions http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=29080999
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
it had to i went there and looked for it ... thanks ...
wich will be a good start point .. slim bean . embryo .. or aroma assure
raptorddd said:
wich will be a good start point .. slim bean . embryo .. or aroma assure
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've used beanstalk and have liked it. If your going to use a 4.3 rom, though, make sure you use the correct recovery. I would suggest the 4.2.2 version until you get more familiar with flashing roms.
Let's keep to only advice on technical issues and not turn this into a Best thread
Thanks
Friendly Neighborhood Moderator
jd1639 said:
I've used beanstalk and have liked it. If your going to use a 4.3 rom, though, make sure you use the correct recovery. I would suggest the 4.2.2 version until you get more familiar with flashing roms.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i seen beanstalk... and also tought i should stick to 4.2 ...is the 4.3 stable?

Request

Hey guys i know ts kindda difficult for you all to develop ROMs but i request you all to build a stble version of RR(Ressurection Remix) for SM-J700f
As you know there arent any stable ROMs for this handset which gives stock android experience...
I hope you will atleast try.
Wrong forum.
Where then should i post it?
Jalaj123 said:
Where then should i post it?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Here -
https://forum.xda-developers.com/galaxy-j7/help
I'm sorry but then why hasn't anyone made a RR ROMROM?

Categories

Resources