CROMi-X vs CM 10.2 - Asus Transformer TF700

Which do you prefer and why?

yugendreams said:
Which do you prefer and why?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have actually never ran anything except Cromi since 2.something. Always been happy with it

redheadplantguy said:
I have actually never ran anything except Cromi since 2.something. Always been happy with it
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
One thing that has turned me off is that it's not running 4.3 and therefore doesn't have the quick settings pulldown like in CM 10.2.
Also I have purchased a theme I really like for CM 10.2 and I don't know if Cromi has themes. Basically I know a bit about CM because I use it on my phone but I know next to nothing about Cromi.

yugendreams said:
One thing that has turned me off is that it's not running 4.3 and therefore doesn't have the quick settings pulldown like in CM 10.2.
Also I have purchased a theme I really like for CM 10.2 and I don't know if Cromi has themes. Basically I know a bit about CM because I use it on my phone but I know next to nothing about Cromi.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
CROMi-X now comes with xposed framework and gravity box - you can customize the quick settings pulldown any which way (if you choose the 4.2 launcher style - you can still choose the 4.1 launcher if you prefer). CROMi-X now also comes with ROM2SD = dual boot capability (run the 2nd rom on your microSD - which is actually faster than the slow internal memory). Doesn't work with CM as the 2nd rom yet - but the devs are getting closer
But I haven't run a CM ROM in a year - so what do I know?
It comes down to personal preference.....

berndblb said:
CROMi-X now also comes with ROM2SD = dual boot capability (run the 2nd rom on your microSD - which is actually faster than the slow internal memory). Doesn't work with CM as the 2nd rom yet - but the devs are getting closer
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why doesn't it work for you? CM was my first test ROM for ROM2SD...

_that said:
Why doesn't it work for you? CM was my first test ROM for ROM2SD...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not like Bernd to fall behind
Yes can confirm CM can be run fine as rom2sd.

sbdags said:
Not like Bernd to fall behind
Yes can confirm CM can be run fine as rom2sd.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
LOL, I am even further behind because I don't have a chance to run the Rom2sd....:silly:

sbdags said:
Not like Bernd to fall behind
Yes can confirm CM can be run fine as rom2sd.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
True! But it is damn hard to keep up with you guys! LOL
I'm in freaking Dallas for the week and I didn't get the card I ordered in time. I never got the Scandisk Extreme to work with ROM2SD
I just hope it was the card and not my inability to use Gparted correctly! That would be embarrassing! :blush:
But I tell you, I am sitting on the edge of my seat here and experiencing serious withdrawal because I can't wait to play with ROM2SD! :gnashingmyteeth:
Next weekend is going to be a flashing one! LOL

Related

Pimp My Rom

Anyone tried this on the TF700T, jellybean or otherwise?
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1908269
Thoughts?
mbiggs31183 said:
Anyone tried this on the TF700T, jellybean or otherwise?
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1908269
Thoughts?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
46 views and no one knows anything about this or has anything to say about it?
Need root
I would try it out only if i had my root, I'm not into unlocking my device. (I don't have any back up of any sort)
46 views and no reply? Maybe no one has tried it. Why don't you try it first and let us know if it boot loops your infinity?
Personally why would you need this? Install cleanrom ule and you'll have a very quick pimped rom.
sbdags said:
46 views and no reply? Maybe no one has tried it. Why don't you try it first and let us know if it boot loops your infinity?
Personally why would you need this? Install cleanrom ule and you'll have a very quick pimped rom.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You don't have to install it to have an opinion on it. Stop and think for a second. So you would just install Cleanrom and just leave it at that? The point is this gives you the option to pick and choose what you want to add to the rom and not be at the mercy of a rom creator. I'll say I've been doing this a long time now and I've learned that most roms are just eat up with bugs and more problems than its worth. I mostly prefer a stock rom with just a few performance tweaks here and there as opposed to one that's going to FC or reboot spontaneously. However if no one has anything intelligent to contribute then by all means moderator, lock this topic.
Aww, play nice people.
I just installed it and am checking it out with the stock Jelly Bean. I admit, I was overwhelmed by options but we'll see how it goes. Hopefully I didn't select anything detrimental. Everything seems okay, and I like the option to reboot faster!
mbiggs31183 said:
You don't have to install it to have an opinion on it. Stop and think for a second. So you would just install Cleanrom and just leave it at that? The point is this gives you the option to pick and choose what you want to add to the rom and not be at the mercy of a rom creator. I'll say I've been doing this a long time now and I've learned that most roms are just eat up with bugs and more problems than its worth. I mostly prefer a stock rom with just a few performance tweaks here and there as opposed to one that's going to FC or reboot spontaneously. However if no one has anything intelligent to contribute then by all means moderator, lock this topic.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So have you actually tried it then?
What's with the attitude?
sbdags said:
So have you actually tried it then?
What's with the attitude?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have tried with xbean on a captivate , semaphore kernel , works like a champ , cleans up all the untidy bits , fast and smooth
Looks very interesting.
I'd be willing to try if it's as easy as the vid makes it look.
Pretty smart of devs to warn to backup first.
I would forget that as usual...
Sent from a tablet optimized by CleanROM 2.3
Well I just flashed this on unofficial cm10. I selected a bunch of tweaks, many of which I have no idea what they are. The rom booted fine and so far no fc's. So far I am not noticing a huge difference anywhere but to be fair I haven't used it much.
Sent from my Transformer Pad Infinity TF700T using Tapatalk 2
I have been using "Pimp My Rom" consistently on my Marvelc (Htc Wildfire S CDMA) running Blackbean-6-V2 from Icu64 http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2099218 (I put Dext+ in the init.d folder before flashing the rom. Then I flash CM10 Kernel 2.1v by eoghant27, Alquez, Modpunk and OliverG96 http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2010083. Finally, I flash Oliver's light based Gaps after first boot. Anyway, all the tweaks I have used from "Pimp My Rom" work awesome and have not given me any problems at all. I just about used everything on there except vm sizes. Hope that info helped out. Yeah you right!
BadbrainsEddie
New Orleans, LA
newellj79 said:
Well I just flashed this on unofficial cm10. I selected a bunch of tweaks, many of which I have no idea what they are. The rom booted fine and so far no fc's. So far I am not noticing a huge difference anywhere but to be fair I haven't used it much.
Sent from my Transformer Pad Infinity TF700T using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse

[Q] "External Storage Inserted". How do I get rid of this notification?

Hi guys,
I have recently added an SD card, and now have this huge notification that I have an SD card inserted. As I like to keep my notification area clean and tidy, this is annoying. I don't need 24/7 notification of this, I know i have a card inserted, I put it there. I can't swipe it away, and its there through reboots and all(And taking up a fairly large amount of space). I can't find a setting anywhere to turn it off, has anyone else resolved this?
I'm Currently Running CleanROM Inheritance 3.4.4
Thanks to anyone who wanders by and has an answer(Good or bad...)
Check this out:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2134244
Although you might want to consider the transition to CROMI-X, in which case the mod is to be found here (same author, different thread):
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2227572
Please note that the mod might not be compatible with the latest 4.3 Final CROMI-X, in which case you'll have to choose between going 4.2 (which was OK) but with notifications, or 4.3 (which is very good) but, possibly, with notifications...
MartyHulskemper said:
Check this out:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2134244
Although you might want to consider the transition to CROMI-X, in which case the mod is to be found here (same author, different thread):
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2227572
Please note that the mod might not be compatible with the latest 4.3 Final CROMI-X, in which case you'll have to choose between going 4.2 (which was OK) but with notifications, or 4.3 (which is very good) but, possibly, with notifications...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Very nice. Thanks for the tip. Going to check this out now and see how it works.:good:
Mikey1969 said:
Very nice. Thanks for the tip. Going to check this out now and see how it works.:good:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you check the thread, pjc21 has reported giving it some TLC this weekend, so we should have the mod updated by Monday. Nice, huh?
Yes I have built the mod into the CROMi-X installer if you do decide to go down a custom rom route.
Just to make sure I'm doing it right, The Color Theme Mod is just an add-in Mod for CleanROM, but the CROMi-X, is a full ROM, just a modded version of CleanROM. That's correct, right? I just want to be sure before I install it.
Thanks
Mikey1969 said:
Just to make sure I'm doing it right, The Color Theme Mod is just an add-in Mod for CleanROM, but the CROMi-X, is a full ROM, just a modded version of CleanROM. That's correct, right? I just want to be sure before I install it.
Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Correct, color theme rom is just a theme add on for cromi. Cromi-x is the newest version of Cleanrom (also called CROMI).
buhohitr said:
Correct, color theme rom is just a theme add on for cromi. Cromi-x is the newest version of Cleanrom (also called CROMI).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Awesome. Thanks muchly for the help!

[Q] Things to do?

I recently bought a Samsung Galaxy Tab 2, 7.0 {P3110} Wifi
I'm pretty happy with it so far, I've installed Clockwork Recovery and CM10.
Anything you guys think I should do that I've left out? what about kernel?
Better Rom?
This is not the first time I've Rooted and Flashed a Rom, I had a little samsung phone, with CM 7, it's pretty old but it still works.
Thanks for your time XDA!
GrimTech said:
I recently bought a Samsung Galaxy Tab 2, 7.0 {P3110} Wifi
I'm pretty happy with it so far, I've installed Clockwork Recovery and CM10.
Anything you guys think I should do that I've left out? what about kernel?
Better Rom?
This is not the first time I've Rooted and Flashed a Rom, I had a little samsung phone, with CM 7, it's pretty old but it still works.
Thanks for your time XDA!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I believe that you have meant CM 10.1, if not then go for the newest.
I'm running Dhollmen Kernel which I recommend. It's stable and have few nice things when it comes to OTGing.
Enable developer settings (hit build number in Device Information section few times) and set your scheduler/governor. I use SIO or ROW for scheduler and pegasusq for governor, but test and choose which one suits you best.
I would also recommend you to use different recovery. PhillZ Touch is my personal favorite.
Ivyl said:
I believe that you have meant CM 10.1, if not then go for the newest.
I'm running Dhollmen Kernel which I recommend. It's stable and have few nice things when it comes to OTGing.
Enable developer settings (hit build number in Device Information section few times) and set your scheduler/governor. I use SIO or ROW for scheduler and pegasusq for governor, but test and choose which one suits you best.
I would also recommend you to use different recovery. PhillZ Touch is my personal favorite.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Whoops, I did mean CM 10.1, sorry,
Phillz Touch has a ubuntu feel to it, {Mainly due to the background} I may stick to CW. Not because of the way it looks, it does look pretty nice, but I've used CW for some time. I may never know. I may flash Phillz Touch one day.
I've flashed Dhollmen's Kernel.
Thanks for the tips Ivyl!
GrimTech said:
Whoops, I did mean CM 10.1, sorry,
Phillz Touch has a ubuntu feel to it, {Mainly due to the background} I may stick to CW. Not because of the way it looks, it does look pretty nice, but I've used CW for some time. I may never know. I may flash Phillz Touch one day.
I've flashed Dhollmen's Kernel.
Thanks for the tips Ivyl!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
PhillZ's recovery is modified CWM IIRC. I like it for it's touch accuracy, support for AROMA File Manager, and ADB root.
No problem, mate. Check other JB 4.2 rooms for their features. PAC seems to be popular. I prefer clean CM (it's fairly minimal, close to AOSP, I have flashable zip that removes some of the apps I don't use) with only few customizations. If it isn't the fastest solution it's at least good placebo. Official stable releases and updater are additional benefits.
Ivyl said:
PhillZ's recovery is modified CWM IIRC. I like it for it's touch accuracy, support for AROMA File Manager, and ADB root.
No problem, mate. Check other JB 4.2 rooms for their features. PAC seems to be popular. I prefer clean CM (it's fairly minimal, close to AOSP, I have flashable zip that removes some of the apps I don't use) with only few customizations. If it isn't the fastest solution it's at least good placebo. Official stable releases and updater are additional benefits.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I tried PAC, Nice little Hybrid Rom,
I'm sadly going back to old roots, I think I've always used CM. I tried PAC and it felt strange, it's nice, don't get me wrong, but what's the Pro's and Cons over CM?
GrimTech said:
I tried PAC, Nice little Hybrid Rom,
I'm sadly going back to old roots, I think I've always used CM. I tried PAC and it felt strange, it's nice, don't get me wrong, but what's the Pro's and Cons over CM?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm not sure what is "borrowed" from AOKP, but features from ParanoidAndroid are nice. It's hybrid UI with so-called Tablet Mode (like the one on stock ROM) and DPI control are mostly appealing to me. There is Pac-in-black switch too, and people seem to like inverted (or darkened) roms here.
Main con for me is too much everything. We get every feature from PA, CM and some from AOKP, which may be considered bloat (at least I do so). It hasn't got stable releases, need manual update downloads, and developer doesn't have the device.
slim bean 7 is super awesome
gizmo99301 said:
slim bean 7 is super awesome
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree. Very smooth.
Sent from my GT-P3100 using Tapatalk HD
gizmo99301 said:
slim bean 7 is super awesome
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Any pro's and cons with Slim Bean 7?
fast, smooth, stable. ive got mine with the next kernel and have absolutely no problems with it at all. all the customization i have done all seems to work, no random reboots, no force close issues. been runnin slim bean now since official 6.
I had cm10.1 and i switched to slimbean. It seems smoother and i like it a lot. Very stable, very smooth, you should try it! You wont be disappointed!
Sent from a long time ago, in a galaxy far far away
MoKee RC3, based on CM10.1 with extra features (PIE, HALO, transparent navbar and status bar, list view animation). Rock solid as CM10.1. Not as complicated as PAC. Combined with Dhollmen Kernel, CrossBreeder script, V6 Supercharger + patched services.jar and manually Odex your framework+system apps. Scored around 7,500 in Antutu with 1.2GHz OC. I have about >150 apps installed.
Well that's what I'm using right now.
Sent from my GT-P3100 using Tapatalk HD
CM10.1 with Next kernel for me, best combination ever tried!

[Q] Rom advise please

Hi Guys,
I have just brought a TF700, and I have set up 3 user profiles, but it is very unstable even after i have disabled all of the unused apps.
From what I have been reading it would appear my best option is to put a custom rom on it.
Now i have achieved this kind of thing in the past as I put Android on a HTC HD2 many moons ago.
I currently have a HTC One and i love the OS on that which is 4.3, so i was wondering if anyone could point me in the direction of a 4.3 Rom that is fairly close to what i have on the HTC One for my TF700.
Thanks in advance
You didn't say which rom you put on your HTC
CM 10.2 emulates JB 4.3, I believe Paranoid and OMNI ROM also have 4.3 versions, but most of the devs seem to have moved on to KitKat (CM11), but it still seems to be somewhat buggy and slow at this point.
You find the threads in the development section
berndblb said:
You didn't say which rom you put on your HTC
CM 10.2 emulates JB 4.3, I believe Paranoid and OMNI ROM also have 4.3 versions, but most of the devs seem to have moved on to KitKat (CM11), but it still seems to be somewhat buggy and slow at this point.
You find the threads in the development section
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for coming back.
I haven't changed anything on my HTC One at moment because I am more than happy with how it is performing.
I will take a look, but once again thanks.
I have been looking at various threads, but I am still a bit undecided on which way to go.
Anyone else that has wanted to update to 4.3 have any tips or advise for me?
I wouldnt mind eventually going down the 4.4 route, but as I have only just got the tablet - I would firstly like to flash it to something more stable than it currently is.
Many Thanks
What really could help to speed up your TF700t is a factory restart.
For me it was really helping a lot .... even if i am right now "only" on rooted stock FW.
Try this as well.
mr_cg said:
What really could help to speed up your TF700t is a factory restart.
For me it was really helping a lot .... even if i am right now "only" on rooted stock FW.
Try this as well.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have only just brought it, and it was back to factory default, but I did it agin before puting all my apps that I wanted on.
And it was very slow and unstable then, but I then disabled all of the preinstalled apps that I didnt want to use, and it is better, but because I have heard that 4.3 does use less memory I still think it would be worth a try.
IndieAce said:
I have been looking at various threads, but I am still a bit undecided on which way to go.
Anyone else that has wanted to update to 4.3 have any tips or advise for me?
I wouldnt mind eventually going down the 4.4 route, but as I have only just got the tablet - I would firstly like to flash it to something more stable than it currently is.
Many Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am not sure why you think 4.3 is so much better than 4.2.1. AFAIK that was not a major update or improvement....
If you are looking for a fast and totally stable rom for this tablet, go for CROMi-X! It's based on the Asus firmware 4.2.1 for this tablet, so everything is optimized for THIS device. CM roms are generic. They run a on a multitude of devices - that's why you have more bugs and conflicts
berndblb said:
I am not sure why you think 4.3 is so much better than 4.2.1. AFAIK that was not a major update or improvement....
If you are looking for a fast and totally stable rom for this tablet, go for CROMi-X! It's based on the Asus firmware 4.2.1 for this tablet, so everything is optimized for THIS device. CM roms are generic. They run a on a multitude of devices - that's why you have more bugs and conflicts
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I was under the impression that 4.3 used less memory?
IndieAce said:
I was under the impression that 4.3 used less memory?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not that I'm aware of. It was a pretty minor upgrade. Kit Kat 4.4 offers far more interesting features.
Plenty of google results out there:
http://www.geek.com/android/quick-look-android-4-3-vs-android-4-2-2-on-the-2012-nexus-7-1563398/
sbdags said:
Not that I'm aware of. It was a pretty minor upgrade. Kit Kat 4.4 offers far more interesting features.
Plenty of google results out there:
http://www.geek.com/android/quick-look-android-4-3-vs-android-4-2-2-on-the-2012-nexus-7-1563398/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thats fair enough.
I have to admit I like the look of the 4.3 more, but decided to upgrade to the CROMi-X one, and then wait for the 4.4 - which I did last night and I am very impressed - it is loads smoother.
So Thanks for your advise.
IndieAce said:
Thats fair enough.
I have to admit I like the look of the 4.3 more, but decided to upgrade to the CROMi-X one, and then wait for the 4.4 - which I did last night and I am very impressed - it is loads smoother.
So Thanks for your advise.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You are welcome. Hope you like it.
IndieAce said:
Thats fair enough.
I have to admit I like the look of the 4.3 more, but decided to upgrade to the CROMi-X one, and then wait for the 4.4 - which I did last night and I am very impressed - it is loads smoother.
So Thanks for your advise.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Good choice! And I KNOW you'll like it!
berndblb said:
Good choice! And I KNOW you'll like it!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I thought that you are running CM 10.2...
LetMeKnow said:
I thought that you are running CM 10.2...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nahhh - only tried it as ROM2SD. And it's still sleeping on some of my sd cards.
I was not impressed. CM didn't add anything but eye candy (I didn't care for) and I think by now CROMi-X in conjunction with Xposed modules (if you care for those and the performance hit they come with) gives you way more options to customize this tablet than CM.... not even mentioning your tweaks!
berndblb said:
Nahhh - only tried it as ROM2SD. And it's still sleeping on some of my sd cards.
I was not impressed. CM didn't add anything but eye candy (I didn't care for) and I think by now CROMi-X in conjunction with Xposed modules (if you care for those and the performance hit they come with) gives you way more options to customize this tablet than CM.... not even mentioning your tweaks!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am happy with Cromi for now. I may try some new roms to test them out in the future when I have time..
LetMeKnow said:
I am happy with Cromi for now. I may try some new roms to test them out in the future when I have time..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah - and that will be like: Never ??? LOL
I ordered the TF701 yesterday and once I got it set up as my daily driver, I'm prepared to test the hell out of this tablet. Should be fun to have a tablet just to play with (and nvflash blobs safely squared away)
berndblb said:
Yeah - and that will be like: Never ??? LOL
I ordered the TF701 yesterday and once I got it set up as my daily driver, I'm prepared to test the hell out of this tablet. Should be fun to have a tablet just to play with (and nvflash blobs safely squared away)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The tf701 looks very good with spec but the I/O does not seem to improve.... Maybe, I need to order one too...haha..:laugh:
Nvflash blob? I like Jtag better and hope that I don't go that route...
i have tf700 with CleanRom 3.4, but now i want to taste something new... 4.4 it goes slowly and i'm triying to guess which one i want to flash cromi-xenogenesis / comi-x / clenrom 3.5 until i wait for a fluid 4.4...
can someone get this dubt?
TheDrgizzmo said:
i have tf700 with CleanRom 3.4, but now i want to taste something new... 4.4 it goes slowly and i'm triying to guess which one i want to flash cromi-xenogenesis / comi-x / clenrom 3.5 until i wait for a fluid 4.4...
can someone get this dubt?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
CROMi-X is just the nickname for CROMi-Xenogenesis (who wants to write that all the time???). CROMi 3.5 would be just a minor step up from what yo got now...
Latest and greatest version of CROMi-X is 5.2.4. But you are on an outdated bootloader and no doubt an old recovery.
So head over to the CROMi-X thread, grab the bootloader/TWRP package sbdags provided in the OP and download the rom (dl both to your microSD)
Boot into TWRP and do a Factory Wipe - that will wipe your apps, but not your data (but you got everything backed up anyway, right????)
Flash the bootloader/TWRP package and reboot
Boot back into TWRP and flash the ROM
berndblb said:
CROMi-X is just the nickname for CROMi-Xenogenesis (who wants to write that all the time???). CROMi 3.5 would be just a minor step up from what yo got now...
Latest and greatest version of CROMi-X is 5.2.4. But you are on an outdated bootloader and no doubt an old recovery.
So head over to the CROMi-X thread, grab the bootloader/TWRP package sbdags provided in the OP and download the rom (dl both to your microSD)
Boot into TWRP and do a Factory Wipe - that will wipe your apps, but not your data (but you got everything backed up anyway, right????)
Flash the bootloader/TWRP package and reboot
Boot back into TWRP and flash the ROM
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i have 10.6.1.14.4 bootloader and TWRP 2.6.3.0 and rom Cromi-X 5.2.4 with ET + fsync off + data2sd, it goes fluid thanks

[KERNEL][1/27] - Stock Kernel v2 - built for 4.3 / ML1 with unlocked firmware!

Stock Kernel
Background:
When Verizon released the ML1 Update you had two options, take the new boot-loader and be locked or NOT take the new boot-loader and remain unlocked. If you choose the latter of the two options the firmware and boot-loader never got updated. This seemed Ok but it would cause WiFi not to work because of the way Verizon coded the kernel to look at the new firmware (from my understanding). If the firmware was not the new version thee WiFi would just never turn on.
Intent:
As the name implies, this is just a recompiled stock kernel without the "WiFi bug" for Android 4.3 / ML1 based ROMS on the OLD UNLOCKED firmware! If you have taken the new firmware (aka: the 4.3 OTA) then you dont have to worry about this! It does not apply to you! This is Only for people on the OLD UNLOCKED firmware!
Why no features added?
Not everyone wants a super duper overclock kernel with 10 million features. Some prefer the simplicity of stock. I am one of those people! This is just a STOCK kernel with no mods other than working WiFi for the ML1 base on the old unlocked firmware.
Note: Version 2 is posted with the exFAT option checked for those using exFAT. Oversight on original build!
Download Stock Kernel v2 HERE: Stock-Kernel-v2.zip - 8.42 MB
Dont be lame, hit Thanks!
Stock Samsung Kernel Source Code: HERE​
Change Log
v2 - 1/27/2014
Added missing exFat support causing some users SD Card to never mount if formatted with exFat (thanks prdog for the heads up)
V1 - 1/26/2014
Initial Build
Just fixed the download link!
scrosler said:
Just fixed the download link!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wow let's all show some love this dude is a beast of a developer and does things few others are willing to take on. A big standing ovation from me my friend.
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda app-developers app
So I just replaced lean kernel with this kernel on old & slows stock rom and it seems to be much snappier so far, well done good sir
MIKEYSAKZ said:
Wow let's all show some love this dude is a beast of a developer and does things few others are willing to take on. A big standing ovation from me my friend.
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Your Welcome!
chocolate8175 said:
So I just replaced lean kernel with this kernel on old & slows stock rom and it seems to be much snappier so far, well done good sir
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Funny thing is... This is a PURE stock build. BUT... here are some oddities I noticed over the stock kernel from VZW...
1. The compiled size is smaller (odd)
2. I used the defconfig that samsung said to use and I dont think its the typical Verizon defconfig. The name just seemed weird.
Its been a long time since I did a kernel so my observations may be pointless...
But I can agree with your statement that it is very smooth. I am running the stock roooted ROM I made with this kernel and I am tempted to get rid of my Note 3!
I think Samsung posted the wrong source or modified it after Verizon used it for the ML1 ROM (or I downloaded the wrong one!!!! lol).
Hmm, that is interesting...
scrosler said:
Just fixed the download link!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
4l
Thanks. Will test to see if I get better battery life over lk. Also grabbed your ml1 ROM version. Been waiting for the release. All previous ROMS have been the best. Thanks.
I usually keep 1 custom kernel and 1 stock kernel around, thank you for bringing the stock option!
EAGLEEYE51 said:
4l
Thanks. Will test to see if I get better battery life over lk. Also grabbed your ml1 ROM version. Been waiting for the release. All previous ROMS have been the best. Thanks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just so you know the ML1 ROM has this kernel in it.
AS far as battery life, Im sure LK will be better, ITs a tweaked kernel.
This is a pure stock build no changes to the code, AT ALL.
I didint even add in a build name. I just did make defconfig followed by make -j16.
The odd thing is, WiFi just happens to work but the Verizon build doesn't. Go figure!
Thats it!
After installing this kernel on old&slows ROM, my SDcard discounts and won't remount. I have wiped both caches and rebooted.
Anyone else having this issue? I don't have time to clean wipe right now, but I will try that when I have some time.
jskolm said:
After installing this kernel on old&slows ROM, my SDcard discounts and won't remount. I have wiped both caches and rebooted.
Anyone else having this issue? I don't have time to clean wipe right now, but I will try that when I have some time.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just noticed I'm having the same issue. Can't mount.
Hmmm... I will check in about 5 hours when I get home.
I talked with one of my Site Admins and he said he had no issues running this kernel with SD Card. Granted he is running it on "my" stock rooted ROM.
What size are ya'll running? and what format?
scrosler said:
I talked with one of my Site Admins and he said he had no issues running this kernel with SD Card. Granted he is running it on "my" stock rooted ROM.
What size are ya'll running? and what format?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
32 gig, exfat.
Just flashed your Rom. Same issue. Wiped cache, dalvik, and system.
gnader said:
32 gig, exfat.
Just flashed your Rom. Same issue. Wiped cache, dalvik, and system.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hmmm, strange
I have a 32 Gig I can test when I get home.
I just tested a micro SD a guy at work had in his S4.
Had no issues with it.
scrosler said:
Hmmm, strange
I have a 32 Gig I can test when I get home.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Fir testing, I went back to lk 4 kernel. SD card works again. Flashing back to yours once more to test.
---------- Post added at 04:10 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:57 PM ----------
gnader said:
Fir testing, I went back to lk 4 kernel. SD card works again. Flashing back to yours once more to test.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Went back to your kernel... SD card not working again.
Going back to lk. I'm a fan of stock bits. Looking forward to a fix. Thanks for your efforts on this kernel!
Working fine on slow&old 12/31 release. No problems with the SD card. Came from lean kernel and this actually seems snappier.
Sent from my SCH-I535 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
bill15872 said:
Working fine on slow&old 12/31 release. No problems with the SD card. Came from lean kernel and this actually seems snappier.
Sent from my SCH-I535 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How big is your card? Trying to narrow down why gnader and the other guy are having issues. Thanks for the feedback!

Categories

Resources