Database Info

Samsung Galaxy R brother with better performance

Nice design,work with ICS but not used Tegra 2 :/
http://samsung-updates.com/2920-samsung-announces-galaxy-r-style-in-south-korea/

{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Damn sgr variant with s4 chip and qhd samoled
This phone is awesome but price tag is lil high 593 usd, I m surprised to knw that sammy launched sequel of sgr galaxy r2
Sent from my GT-I9103 using Tapatalk 2

xlm13x said:
Damn sgr variant with s4 chip and qhd samoled
This phone is awesome but price tag is lil high 593 usd, I m surprised to knw that sammy launched sequel of sgr galaxy r2
Sent from my GT-I9103 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
True, but it's new release, his price will drop, but fuuuuuuuuuuu s,s2,s3 --> r, r2

ZeXzr said:
s,s2,s3 --> r, r2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
When we will see r3
Sent from my GT-I9103 using Tapatalk 2

xlm13x said:
When we will see r3
Sent from my GT-I9103 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Who knows but they left Tegra 2 out of device it says something :/

ZeXzr said:
Who knows but they left Tegra 2 out of device it says something :/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
they have moved to next gen arm9 processor, s4 on htc one s scores more than tegra3 on htc one x

ZeXzr said:
Who knows but they left Tegra 2 out of device it says something :/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
True, would be more logical to put Tegra 3 : R ----> Tegra 2, R2 ----> Tegra 3
But it is a Samsung

ZeXzr said:
True, would be more logical to put Tegra 3 : R ----> Tegra 2, R2 ----> Tegra 3
But it is a Samsung
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yes they have maintained it in s series,
s> hummingburd
s2> exynos dual
s3> exynos quad
all 3 chipsets r samsungs home made, but here they just moved to snapdraon from nvidia

SO does it mean that Tegra2 is faulty and tegra 3 is better.
Leaving Tegra family out, means theres a sign that Samsung may not have negotiated with Nvidea
And also does it risk to R1..of not getting ICS ???
and does it have anything in connection with all the answer sammy gave on all networking sites ??
But this New R..is superb. i just want to grab it...hhhmmm damm..!!
If the screen size would have been 4.2" we could have got a lot more accessories.

Looking so pretty in white!! Really just amazing...
Btw, SGR (initial model) is still available in singapore, I just saw it today for 530 sgd(singapore dollar)
Sent from my GT-I9103

That's the Japanese SII variant I think , either that or it's the Galaxy R Style
This was sent from a Galaxy Ace. Problem?

Either way.. I think We will definitely Get ICS and R Style? Looks Cooler..
Maybe an R2 is in pipe!!

it looks cool thn the original R & impressive specs too

it looks cool thn the original R & impressive specs too
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Its same as original sgr just colored white and at back square camera istead of round. Look closely speaker grill, and body is same as r, sammy just changed specs and lil changes in looks.
Sent from my GT-I9103 using Tapatalk 2

some pics of galaxy r style (galaxy r2 )

pudup said:
Pretty impressive. Heard it has bluetooth 4 and nfc along with a 2000 mAH battery and 4G.
Plus 960x540 resolution.
Outclassed we are.
Sent from my GT-I9103 using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yup its just a lite version of s iii
Sent from my GT-I9103 using Tapatalk 2

R style is based
on snapdragon s4-28 nm technology
Our galaxy R -Tegra2-40nm
Galaxy s2 -exynos-45nm
Galaxy s3 exynos- 32 nm
.
Lower value means low power consumption and high performance.
Sent from my GT-I9103 using Tapatalk 2

pudup said:
From what I can tell though, the gap between s2 and r is much smaller than that between s3 and r2.
Sent from my GT-I9103 using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well they have learnt their lessons after launching Galaxy R which came pretty close in looks and performance to S2 in the Samsung line up which might have been counter-productive for them.

Manjunath324 said:
R style is based
on snapdragon s4-28 nm technology
Our galaxy R -Tegra2-40nm
Galaxy s2 -exynos-45nm
Galaxy s3 exynos- 32 nm
.
Lower value means low power consumption and high performance.
Sent from my GT-I9103 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So it means that S2's performance is the lowest ?

m.kochan10 said:
So it means that S2's performance is the lowest ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
In raw CPU, yes

[SAMSUNG] Galaxy Tab 3 7.0 Announced

See here: http://www.sammobile.com/2013/04/29/samsung-galaxy-tab-3-announced/
SPECS:
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
BENCHMARK:
Images:
http://www.sammobile.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/GALAXY-Tab-3-7-inch_001_WiFi.jpg
http://www.sammobile.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/GALAXY-Tab-3-7-inch_004_side.jpg
Source: http://www.sammobile.com/2013/04/29/samsung-galaxy-tab-3-announced/

Display still at 1024x600? They could have at least upgraded the display..

Yeah don't see this much of an upgrade from the current tab2 outside of a new outer shell lol.. I agree coul dhave at least bumped up the rez on the display to at least nexus 7 levels.. oh well guess to keep the cost down.

Incredible, the same tab again. :banghead:
Enviado desde mi GT-P3110 usando Tapatalk 2

Not much an update, just the look of S4 and the addition of 200Mhz processor. I'll stick to what I got
Sent from my GT-P3110 running Slimbean

I guess Samsung is trying to made a cheap Galaxy Tab, as they high-end tablet line is now the GNote 8.0 and 10.1 series... But they really should improve the screen resolution and Camera.
If it come with Multiwindow (probally it come), maybe it will be more easy to port to GTab2, as S Voice etc...
Sent from my GTab 2 7.0 using xda-premium app

C'mon Samsung, hardware button for an Tab? that sucks really

Dexxmor said:
C'mon Samsung, hardware button for an Tab? that sucks really
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
In design, this tablet is a throwback,
-first generation: soft buttons,
-second generation: no buttons,
-Third generation: physical buttons?! WTF?
Furthermore, somebody should tell Samsung to not use the S3-like design on all devices... in 2013 May, it was good, new, revolutionary... but now??

Wth are u thinking samsung? Epic fail...

Narciso Neto said:
I guess Samsung is trying to made a cheap Galaxy Tab, as they high-end tablet line is now the GNote 8.0 and 10.1 series... But they really should improve the screen resolution and Camera.
If it come with Multiwindow (probally it come), maybe it will be more easy to port to GTab2, as S Voice etc...
Sent from my GTab 2 7.0 using xda-premium app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think you hit the point home! They probably want the Note8 to take the lead on the high end and the Tab 3 for cheaper lower end tablets. Their decision on the specks surprise me...but again...they will probably release half a dozen other models with varying specks before the charge on my tab runs out
Not a major upgrade model wise.
Sent via Galaxy tab P3113

Sigh....Samsung you've done so well...you get one fail
Sent from my GT-P3110 using xda app-developers app

Now I am glad that I bought tab 2 as tab 3 has got nothing new noticeable
But point is will Samsung update new tab to android 5.0
If not its complete waste
Sent from my C1504 using xda app-developers app

Droidlover123 said:
Now I am glad that I bought tab 2 as tab 3 has got nothing new noticeable
But point is will Samsung update new tab to android 5.0
If not its complete waste
Sent from my C1504 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Pretty sure tab 2 will also get 5.0 through cyanogen guys... Already on 4.2.2 with everything working greater than stock. Definitely not worth the upgrade... The hard ware button is a good design I think.. lock button on my tab 2 already feels like it's going unresponsive.... Having one more button to wake up the device is a good thing right?
Sent from my GT-P3110 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

I posted Galaxy tab 3 bechmark from SAMMOBILE...
it's a lot better than GTab 2...

The Verizon tab 2 has a 1.2ghz snapdragon (mine's OC'd to 1.7ghz ). Actually, it's essentially the Galaxy S3 with a larger screen and suckier resolution. From the looks of it, this is going to be a regurgitation of the Verizon tab 2 as a non-LTE model.

rgbers said:
Not much an update, just the look of S4 and the addition of 200Mhz processor. I'll stick to what I got
Sent from my GT-P3110 running Slimbean
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The S4 isn't only a 200MHz increment, but a more efficient micro architecture A15 vs A9.
Remember how a 1.8Ghz Core 2 Duo had greater performance than 3.7Ghz Netburst Pentium D?
Thats the type of difference that A15 makes over A9

Droidlover123 said:
Now I am glad that I bought tab 2 as tab 3 has got nothing new noticeable
But point is will Samsung update new tab to android 5.0
If not its complete waste
Sent from my C1504 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not update to 5.0, is dual core processor
Enviado desde mi GT-P3110 usando Tapatalk 2

I'm still hoping they'll hit a middle ground somewhere between this and the Note 8. Assuming this is a $150-$199 device (plus accounting for assumed iPad Mini updates in a few months) they pretty much have to have a 'mid-tier' small-ish tablet for around $250-299. But given the Note 8's exceedingly average resolution (not to mention its price) I'm not holding out too much hope of a unicorn-like device that's a true successor to the Tab 7.7 anymore.
I ended up selling my Nexus 7 (buggy, pathetic speakers.) But maybe the rumored Nexus 7.7 will end up being close to what it's cracked up to be.

moliverac8 said:
Not update to 5.0, is dual core processor
Enviado desde mi GT-P3110 usando Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Maybe KeyLimePie will be Android 4.3, not 5.0

Narciso Neto said:
Maybe KeyLimePie will be Android 4.3, not 5.0
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, it seems that 4.3 is another Jelly Bean and 5.0 is KLP

GSM Arena Compares i9500 and i9505

Enjoy.
http://www.gsmarena.com/samsung_galaxy_s4_i9500_vs_i9505-review-930.php
imo i9505 wins.

the title is misleading. You said engadget, but it is from gsmarena. WT-

Something is off with their benchmarks I have never gotten under 28500 on Antutu.
Sent from my GT-I9500 using xda premium

Introduces gsmarena to Doc's barebone and perseus kernel.
/Endthread
From my Galaxy S4 i9500, in your face.....

This test is definitely a hoax. Everybody knows i9500 has a better battery life, camera lens, and stronger CPU. In this test the scores are too low of the i9500. I always get at least 28k+ on Antutu and 13+ on Quadrant. (Fully stock)

Yah yah yah ... I don't care a bit about tiny marginals!
Both variants have monster performance and both can be tweaked to perform even better :laugh:

Vadrieldur said:
This test is definitely a hoax. Everybody knows i9500 has a better battery life, camera lens, and stronger CPU. In this test the scores are too low of the i9500. I always get at least 28k+ on Antutu and 13+ on Quadrant. (Fully stock)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And I get higher scores than they do too for the i9505 (25k+ Antutu and 13k+ Quadrant) with stock clocks.
It's not like these tests are that perfect in consistency. The i9500 is faster but it's a small margin.

"This however, isn't necessarily due to the difference in camera sensors, but rather the software versions of both phones, as they do differ - XXUAMDE for the i9500 vs. XXUAMDC for the i9505. The Exynos Galaxy S4 has newer software version, which might be an explanation for the different camera processing"
Bêta Firmwares 12/04/2013 lol
Envoyé depuis mon GT-I9500 avec Tapatalk

Not particularly smart of them eh?

azdine57 said:
"This however, isn't necessarily due to the difference in camera sensors, but rather the software versions of both phones, as they do differ - XXUAMDE for the i9500 vs. XXUAMDC for the i9505. The Exynos Galaxy S4 has newer software version, which might be an explanation for the different camera processing"
Bêta Firmwares 12/04/2013 lol
Envoyé depuis mon GT-I9500 avec Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Maybe in tests of gsmarena, because snapdragom and exynos have a builds of May me2 and me1
Sent from my GT-I9500 using xda app-developers app

{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

Ussy said:
Enjoy.
http://www.gsmarena.com/samsung_galaxy_s4_i9500_vs_i9505-review-930.php
imo i9505 wins.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why?

Ussy said:
Enjoy.
http://www.gsmarena.com/samsung_galaxy_s4_i9500_vs_i9505-review-930.php
imo i9505 wins.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sleep well..
BTW, next time try to copy-paste properly. Engadget??

thekoRngear said:
the title is misleading. You said engadget, but it is from gsmarena. WT-
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol was in a rush. Both are semi-respectable sites.
barondebxl said:
Why?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Battery life seems better, audio is just as good and SoC is easier to develop for.
CLARiiON said:
Sleep well..
BTW, next time try to copy-paste properly. Engadget??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks, will do. Goodnight.
Sent from my C6603 using xda premium

Engadget really aren't respectable any more.
I find it laughable how middle of the road the comparison is.
I'm not sure why they'd review like this -- clearly other people have got different results.
And is the call time really so bad on the Exynos model?
Sent from my GT-N7100 using xda premium

Funny how everyone gets mad when the exynos isn't as dominant as some fanboys here expected it to be.

Isn't Engadget an Apple loving fansite now? (and so is Anandtech, and Gizmodo... the list goes on)
Gsmarena at least test better than Engadget, who don't have a clue what they're doing, but they did slip on this one XD
The performance differences are indeed subtle, but I'd like more accurate information regarding battery life, are there any other links that test this?

Derpston said:
Funny how everyone gets mad when the exynos isn't as dominant as some fanboys here expected it to be.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It is called little man syndrome. Even geeks have it. Heck some might even be driving Porsches and talking on their i9500 right now. I am gonna stick to my Google gs4 and galaxy note 2 international version.
Sent from my GT-N7100

Derpston said:
Funny how everyone gets mad when the exynos isn't as dominant as some fanboys here expected it to be.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, it's funny how everyone gets mad when 'respectable' review sites seem to publish different benchmark scores to what everyone else is getting. Did they just run it once and then not even bother to reboot the phone first?
Sent from my GT-N7100 using xda premium

SirCanealot said:
No, it's funny how everyone gets mad when 'respectable' review sites seem to publish different benchmark scores to what everyone else is getting. Did they just run it once and then not even bother to reboot the phone first?
Sent from my GT-N7100 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I always see higher benchmark scores at XDA for almost every phone compared to all of the reviews on 'respectable' sites. The i9500 and i9505 aren't unique at this.

S4 vs Note 2

can anyone tell me which is best for gaming s4 or note 2?
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda app-developers app

You are still on s1?
Damn
Sent from my GT-I9505 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app

i m using s3 s1 was my first phone and i dont like to sell it
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda app-developers app

khankk42 said:
can anyone tell me which is best for gaming s4 or note 2?
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think Note 2 better...
S4 screen small for me for example for Modern Combat 4 no pleasure to play...
N2 preferably IMHO

eseregin said:
I think Note 2 better...
S4 screen small for me for example for Modern Combat 4 no pleasure to play...
N2 preferably IMHO
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oo i dont have problem with that my kd is 1.41
My account: coolnessQReal
Verstuurd van mijn GT-I9505

coolnessQ said:
Oo i dont have problem with that my kd is 1.41
My account: coolnessQReal
Verstuurd van mijn GT-I9505
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Cheers with your post number 666
Probably will connect from Nexus 7 though

eseregin said:
Cheers with your post number 666
Probably will connect from Nexus 7 though
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol imma No Satan Fan
Verstuurd van mijn GT-I9505

S4 is fkn good for gaming, see my games, all running amazing.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Enviado desde mi GT-I9500

Between S4 and Note2. S4.
But Note 3 is around the corner. If you are interested, it will be available in a month.

khankk42 said:
can anyone tell me which is best for gaming s4 or note 2?
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Its basically your preference. Both are great devices, its either you want a phablet which you use with two hands or a smartphone you use with one. If your going for an everyday use kind of phone i'd go with the s4. But like the above poster said if you want a phablet just hold off for another month and get the note 3. But if your on an american carrier which I don't think you are then the bootloader would be locked on all the new devices coming out.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I337

I would go for the note if you want gaming , s4 gets hot very fast up to 44c while note never goes above 35c in asphalt 8, also battery lasts longer in gaming with note 2 , only bad thing is note has little bit of micro lag in response @ max details vs s4. Note 3 would be best solution fir gaming or one max when they get out.

In less than a month note 3 will be out ... i think if u are going to buy now it's worth to wait maybe see the first reviews of it and then buy ...
But generally in gaming bigger screen and battery is a big plus ... also if hardware/software optimization is done right this time by samsung the phone will not overheat ... at least not that much as the s4

Shan89 said:
I would go for the note if you want gaming , s4 gets hot very fast up to 44c while note never goes above 35c in asphalt 8, also battery lasts longer in gaming with note 2 , only bad thing is note has little bit of micro lag in response @ max details vs s4. Note 3 would be best solution fir gaming or one max when they get out.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You talking about 44c battery or cpu?
Sent from my :tank:

I don't play games on my mobile, but if I did I would go for Note 2. As I have used it for more than 7 months, I can concur that it was an amazing device. It was smooth, fast and didn't get as hot as my S4. I sold it and bought S4 for only one reason, size. It was way too big for me. I love the overall size of S4. But it stutters more than Note 2, especially I miss the fantastic stock browser of Note 2, the stock browser on S4 is next to horrible. God knows what Samsung have done!
Anyway, I am happy that I bought S4 and sold Note 2, I don't regret my decision a tiny bit, but if someone is happy or comfortable with the size of Note 2 then I see no reason to buy S4 over it.

Your scores on Anomaly 2 Benchmark

Hi !
With others guys we are a french team and we have made a website about Android games. We do news and french reviews with Youtube videos.
In a the last news I have presented the new application of benchmark made by 11 bit studios, developer of Anomaly Warzone Earth and Anomaly Korea, and this benchmark application have the particularity to test the power of Android mobiles just in game performances.
Link of the news for more info (in french, but you can probably find another news in english in the web) : http://androgames.fr/anomaly-2-benchmark-testez-vos-performances-en-jeu/
Results : http://androgames.fr/anomaly-2-benchmark-liste-et-classement-des-resultats/
Direct link of the application : https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.elevenbitstudios.anomaly2Benchmark
I think it's interesting to have a list of results of diferents mobiles to do comparison, so I have started to make it with mobiles of our french community. But we haven't all mobiles so I suggest you to participate in this list.
We need some informations (you can put this on comments of the topic or directly on comments in the news of website) :
- your mobile's model
- result of test in low quality
- result of test in medium quality
- result of test in hight quality
Thank you !
Faly-Thomas Langlois

Up

Ok. Galaxy Note 2 here, slightly overclocked to 1.8Ghz, GPU @ default.
Lot's of stuff installed, not a benchmarking rom
Some flickering textures present during benchmark.
From observing the gameplay so to speak, low is the only quality that is smooth enough for gaming
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

Not compatible with my phone
Xperia z
Sent from my C6603 using Tapatalk 4

mat9v said:
Ok. Galaxy Note 2 here, slightly overclocked to 1.8Ghz, GPU @ default.
Lot's of stuff installed, not a benchmarking rom
Some flickering textures present during benchmark.
From observing the gameplay so to speak, low is the only quality that is smooth enough for gaming
View attachment 2260137View attachment 2260138View attachment 2260139
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks to share your results but I prefer to have the results without overclock, can you retry that in stock frequency please ?

Device:Nexus 4
High 286000
Medium 398300
Low 585500

MattJaO3D said:
Not compatible with my phone
Xperia z
Sent from my C6603 using Tapatalk 4
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
May be it's because you have a custom ROM not compatible ?

At the time I was using an honami rom, now I've gone back to stock deodexed and can install it now, post results soon
Sent from my C6603 using Tapatalk 4

MattJaO3D said:
At the time I was using an honami rom, now I've gone back to stock deodexed and can install it now, post results soon
Sent from my C6603 using Tapatalk 4
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Perfect, thanks

I ran the game on medium and high setting, scene 2, when road explodes it's a bit lagging on frames, but imo ran smooth and btw graphics looks awesome on 1080 screen
Good work
Sent from my C6603 using Tapatalk 4

Screen shots
Sent from my C6603 using Tapatalk 4

Nexus 4
Sent from my Nexus 4 using xda app-developers app

Falysix said:
Thanks to share your results but I prefer to have the results without overclock, can you retry that in stock frequency please ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok, here are results with CPU @ default.
View attachment 2277858View attachment 2277859View attachment 2277860
High: 51932
Med: 98853
Low: 431027

mat9v said:
Ok, here are results with CPU @ default.
View attachment 2277858View attachment 2277859View attachment 2277860
High: 51932
Med: 98853
Low: 431027
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks, I've share it

Up !

It weighs a lot, more than 500MB, when I have some time I pruevo, I have not much hope of taking good score ...

Sony Xperia SP C5303
only dual core

duskblade said:
Sony Xperia SP C5303
only dual core
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The Xperia SP have good performances as the Nexus 4

Score on Verizon Note 3 stock
High: 954,117

AT&T Stock Galaxy Note 3
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 AT&T Stock - Ver 4.3
Low - 1,874,083
Medium - 1,237,210
High - 974,238