Hi! I am new to this site:victory: and i want to pick a phone from these two.Will Yo help Me Decide:silly:
Benchmarks are as follows:
Titanium S1:
Quadrant Benchmark: 4550.
Antutu Benchmark: 10966.
Nenamark2: 40.1 fps.
Linpack : Single 50, Multi 105.
Multi Touch: 5 point.
Titanium S2:
Quadrant Benchmark : 3986.
Anututu Benchmark : 13575.
Nenamark2 : 41.5 fps.
Vellamo : HTML5 = 1386, Metal = 430.
Multi Touch : 5 point
Specs are as follows:
Titanium S1:
MSM8625 Qualcomm Snapdragon processor 1.2 ghz with Adreno 203 GPU
4.5 inch wvga display
1gb Ram
1600 mah battery
Titanium S2:
MT6589M 1.2 ghz with PowerVR SGX 544 MP
512 mb Ram
5 inch fwvga
2100 mah battery
I want to pick a phone and choices are strictly these two.
i want to play games like nova 3, gangter rio,Shadowgun,Dead Trigger
Which of these phones can play them smoothly?
If there will be difference in gaming preformance,how much will it be?
If anybody could upload video playing some of these games on titanium s2 on youtube it will be greatly appreciated.
Thanks in advance
Go For Titanium S1! AnTuTu score doesn't make much difference.. U wont be dissapointed..
Sent from my Titanium S1 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Ya I agree .. M using karbonn s2 and few high end games creates problem ...
Sent from my Karbonn S2 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Related
http://nena.se/nenamark/view?version=2
Tmobile Galaxy S2 with Snapdragon (Qualcomm Adreno 220) - 54.5 fps
Galaxy S2 with Exynos (ARM Mali-400 MP)- 45.42 fps
I wonder if they test on same Android version. 2.3.4 & 2.3.5 is giant leap in performance.
nraudigy2 said:
http://nena.se/nenamark/view?version=2
Tmobile Galaxy S2 with Snapdragon (Qualcomm Adreno 220) - 54.5 fps
Galaxy S2 with Exynos (ARM Mali-400 MP)- 45.42 fps
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's probably a higher clocked version, guess Samsung weren't pleased with its performance at stock. Would be interesting to see what kind of battery performance it gets.
Where did that score get from? Anyway it's still early, it's just 1 result for that entry. I'm also getting 57.6fps on mine if I overclock it. but on the other hand there are huge improvements to be had on the driver side on the Adreno family so maybe Qualcomm finally got its ass on working and the new T-mobile version comes with new drivers.
Well T-Mobile Ver. is clocked at 1.5Ghz whereas S2 is 1.2Ghz, it can give a performance boost. Unless Adreno has improved the driver or something.
nraudigy2 said:
http://nena.se/nenamark/view?version=2
Tmobile Galaxy S2 with Snapdragon (Qualcomm Adreno 220) - 54.5 fps
Galaxy S2 with Exynos (ARM Mali-400 MP)- 45.42 fps
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
very interesting
Adreno 220 is always up to 260+ MHz on clock, meanwhile Mali 400 it's only at 167 MHz, but it can be overclocked to 400 MHz.
In Anandtech's Qualcomm S4 article, Adreno is like ATI's desktop cards. The shaders can be pretty fast if you can write code to fully utilize them.
in octa DDR3 but in snapdragon 600? ddr2?
If I am right then yes. Snap 600 is lpddr2 and snap 800 should be lpddr3
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda app-developers app
Snapdragon 600 supports lpddr3 but im not sure if it supports 800 mhz speed wich Octa does
paorpas said:
in octa DDR3 but in snapdragon 600? ddr2?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The one leaked in glbenchmark was supposedly having lpddr3 ram and it was korean variant with s600, also s600 supports ddr3.
I think s600 variant(s) will have lpddr3 ram.
sent from an Galaxy s3 GT I9300
Running perseus kernel 33.1 , XELLA 4.1.2 leaked build
forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1784401
Dont click,you might regret , I won't be responsible if you brick ur head
Since s600 is LPDDR3 capable, and octa version according to benchmarks is using LPDDR3, it should be use '3 version.
Quit buying-selling phones and eat a Paella, Paorpas.
DDR3 for both.
At the announcement it said DDR3 2GB.
If it wasn't, they wouldve said depending on the market DDR2. But they didnt.
Sent from my Nexus 4 using xda premium
I have a GT P7500 running Jellybean AOKP, and a Gingerbread Alcatel onetouch 918n running on cyanogenmod...
My problem is that, on the p4 - the Open GL ES 2.0 maxes at 4fps (which sucks btw) while on the much inferior OT918n it maxes up to 26fps. The 3D graphics on the p4 scores 795 on antutu while on the OT918N the antutu score 2419.
The p4's GPU renderer is Nvidia while the OT 918n's GPU renderer is Chainfire's with the powerVR plugin..
So, is there any workaround to increase the p4's GPU rendering? I tried installing Chainfire3D once but the p4 did not boot.
I included screenshots of the benchmark scores.
thanks.
Hello, i bought a china phone with quad core mtk6582 cpu.
In Antutu benchmark show that cpu is - 4+4 cores - what it this? 4 cores or ?
For the GPU - Antutu say - Mali 400 MP
But i see that this MTK6582 , have mali 400 mp2 gpu - so which is correct antutu or ?
I Try with another benchmark quadrant standart - and there also show mali 400 mp as a single core.
Do you know how much cores is this gpu?
Thanks
Maybe antutu was wrong,try google it bro,maybe it can help,check it on mtk website or your phone's brand website
Sent from my N986 using xda premium
Use CPU-Z app find u can find everything perfectly
I've some questions...
1) The Indian Note 3 model number SM N900 and not SM N9000. Correct?
2) The EXYNOS 5420 chip that powers the Note 3 is supposed to be an Octa core processor. However, in the phone details (using Antutu benchmark tool / CPUZ) all the 8 cores aren't visible. While it says that there are 4+4 cores, only the Cortex A15 @ 1.9 GHz with "core 0, core 1, core 2 and core 3" is visible. The other one - Cortex A7 @ 1.3 GHz with the remaining 4 cores isn't visible. What is the reason for this? Is my phone a 'wrong piece'? Should I ask for replacement? Or is this normal? If this is normal, why so? Where did the other processor and the remaining 4 cores go?
Sent from my SM-N900 using XDA Free mobile app
davemihir said:
I've some questions...
1) The Indian Note 3 model number SM N900 and not SM N9000. Correct?
2) The EXYNOS 5420 chip that powers the Note 3 is supposed to be an Octa core processor. However, in the phone details (using Antutu benchmark tool / CPUZ) all the 8 cores aren't visible. While it says that there are 4+4 cores, only the Cortex A15 @ 1.9 GHz with "core 0, core 1, core 2 and core 3" is visible. The other one - Cortex A7 @ 1.3 GHz with the remaining 4 cores isn't visible. What is the reason for this? Is my phone a 'wrong piece'? Should I ask for replacement? Or is this normal? If this is normal, why so? Where did the other processor and the remaining 4 cores go?
Sent from my SM-N900 using XDA Free mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I do not have a Note 3 but the Exynos Octa-core isn't actually a octa-core. There are 4 phisical processors and 4 virtual processor, so that's somehow a fake octa-core and possibly that's why antutu shows you only 4 processors.
1) N900 and N9000 are the exact same thing. Samsung devices have a 5 or an 0 at the end to indicate LTE(5) or 3G(0) devices. With the N9000, they simply dropped the last 0.
2) Benchmark tools can only detect one active CPU at a time (Physical or Virtual), so they automatically detect the first physical one.