10/1/13 Core killer app test v1.1beta?? - Verizon Samsung Galaxy S III

Update to version 1.1beta
Ok so maybe I should have posted this in development at this point but...idk
So I built another app and would like ppl to test it out. This app will kill core 2 to increase battery life. It also kills when the screen is off.
Just push the off button and the the core will be turned off and will remain off till you turn it on through the app or reboot.
Please let me know your thoughts!
This is going to be free on the market when its done.
Please let me know your battery life and what not if you can.
Thanks guys!
Version 1.1beta
http://www.androidfilehost.com/?fid=23159073880933183

How is this different from CPU Sleeper?
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda app-developers app

fatasian said:
How is this different from CPU Sleeper?
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Its off all the time. Not just when the screen is off
Sent from my SCH-I535 using Xparent Cyan Tapatalk 2

Anybody have some feedback?
Battery life better?
Anything?

razz1 said:
Anybody have some feedback?
Battery life better?
Anything?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
haven't done anything long term to test battery life but it seems not to keep core2 off 100% of the time (is it supposed to?). even when i directly wake from the lock screen into the app itself i can see core status switching off & on.
im also getting a lot of SU toast notifications outside of the app itself. when i run linpak the multi thread yields results typical of both cores running.
running Liquid smooth and a custom BMS kernel.
thanks but uninstalled for now

s0me guy said:
haven't done anything long term to test battery life but it seems not to keep core2 off 100% of the time (is it supposed to?). even when i directly wake from the lock screen into the app itself i can see core status switching off & on.
im also getting a lot of SU toast notifications outside of the app itself. when i run linpak the multi thread yields results typical of both cores running.
running Liquid smooth and a custom BMS kernel.
thanks but uninstalled for now
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Great! Thanks for your time and info!!

razz1 said:
Great! Thanks for your time and info!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
no problem.

Updated to ver1.1beta

razz1 said:
Update to version 1.1beta
Ok so maybe I should have posted this in development at this point but...idk
So I built another app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This would go in Themes and Apps when complete, not development.

Related

Cpu monitor

Anyone have any suggestions for a good/accurate cpu temp monitor? Free or paid.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I997 using XDA Premium App
VtHondaGuy08 said:
Anyone have any suggestions for a good/accurate cpu temp monitor? Free or paid.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I997 using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
lol, in spite of your huge eyesore of a signature, you've still only gotten 3 "thanks" in a year on the forums?
Might be time to tone down the rediculous sig...
Just barley put that sig up about 2 weeks ago. Could of pm'd me that to instead of posting that.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I997 using XDA Premium App
I like systemPanel in the market
brounstoun said:
lol, in spite of your huge eyesore of a signature, you've still only gotten 3 "thanks" in a year on the forums?
Might be time to tone down the rediculous sig...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This guy been here for over 5 years and has 8 posts and he is making comments. if you have nothing nice to say SHUTUP!!
BACK ON TOPIC: I use cpu master pretty good and is widget too
I use elixer widget its free and lets me see my cpu clock speed % used and battery life left in one widgett but you can make your own widgets showing anything u like
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I997 using XDA Premium App
i like set CPU.
I also use SetCPU
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I997 using XDA App
hey ive tried all of these but they don't show my cpu temp just says battery temp??
Or is that the cpu temp??
mikeybumps said:
hey ive tried all of these but they don't show my cpu temp just says battery temp??
Or is that the cpu temp??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Did you read first line of this post? http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=40448130&postcount=2
yes that was my post
I didn't know if this one would show up being as old as it is
mikeybumps said:
yes that was my post
I didn't know if this one would show up being as old as it is
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Actually that was Zen's post and in the first line he tells you that the ONLY temp sensor that the Infuse has is for the battery
Ya but that's weird tho y put a battery temp sensor but not one for the CPU idk
But thanks
Cooltool a lot of options and free in thw store

LeanKernel 12.2 on SynergyROM 1.4

I tried to reply to the main thread in the development thread for SynergyROM, but as I do not have the 10 posts required, I figured I'd put it here. If this is against the rules, please let me know and remove this.
Apparently the busybox install on 1.4 is a little botched, and as such, when you install LeanKernel 12.2, it doesn't run the scripts it needs to in order to run it's magic.
All you need to do to get it to work again is fix the install of busybox on your phone. You can download busybox from the Play store and install it to your phone, and after that, installing the kernel should be relatively easy.
I've been running 12.2 on my phone for the better part of today at work and have had no issues with it at all.
I'd attach a link as proof, but apparently I can't do that either.
This is what I did too and it's working wonders.
Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk 2
Good News on Thx 4 the post
jrichards2007 said:
I tried to reply to the main thread in the development thread for SynergyROM, but as I do not have the 10 posts required, I figured I'd put it here. If this is against the rules, please let me know and remove this.
Apparently the busybox install on 1.4 is a little botched, and as such, when you install LeanKernel 12.2, it doesn't run the scripts it needs to in order to run it's magic.
All you need to do to get it to work again is fix the install of busybox on your phone. You can download busybox from the Play store and install it to your phone, and after that, installing the kernel should be relatively easy.
I've been running 12.2 on my phone for the better part of today at work and have had no issues with it at all.
I'd attach a link as proof, but apparently I can't do that either.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thx for your post and gr8 find on the busybox
I have been trying to decide which one to load
SynergyROM 1.3
or
SynergyROM 1.5
Now I know that imo 12.2 will work
long as the busybox is loaded first.
due to the issues with 12.2 loop booting.
Now I can load 1.4 will let you know how it goes.
Thanks Again.
Cheers,
Azbobs
Worked for me too
Worked for me as well. Thanks for the post.
Sent from my Sammy Galaxy S3 using Tapatalk 2
Where is the kernel thread??
Ill give this a shot today.
Any sense as to battery life with the new kernel??
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda premium
mpetruzz said:
Where is the kernel thread??
Ill give this a shot today.
Any sense as to battery life with the new kernel??
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://rootzwiki.com/topic/31329-imoseyon-test-leankernel-tw-82-v122-kexec/
mpetruzz said:
Where is the kernel thread??
Ill give this a shot today.
Any sense as to battery life with the new kernel??
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
^ Also would like to know this. I was seeing some signs of worse battery life on 1.4. I'd like to know if the kernel + 1.4 is better battery life.
SightSeeker said:
^ Also would like to know this. I was seeing some signs of worse battery life on 1.4. I'd like to know if the kernel + 1.4 is better battery life.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am running Imoseyons 12-2 kernel with the cpu editor script using battery saver and notice a considerable difference in battery life.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1584508
Earl831SC said:
I am running Imoseyons 12-2 kernel with the cpu editor script using battery saver and notice a considerable difference in battery life.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1584508
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do you know what exactly it is scaling at? Also what does the 12-2 kernel do vs the script? Does the kernel alone underclock?
SightSeeker said:
Do you know what exactly it is scaling at? Also what does the 12-2 kernel do vs the script? Does the kernel alone underclock?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The battery saver from the script sets the max frequency on the cpus to 1134000. This can be changed in the script as well. I run the batter saver but change the max frequency to 1350000 for both cores. I do not believe the kernel has underclocking abilities currently, but I may be wrong. Definitely snappier with the kernel than without. The combination of the two is excellent.
Earl831SC said:
The battery saver from the script sets the max frequency on the cpus to 1134000. This can be changed in the script as well. I run the batter saver but change the max frequency to 1350000 for both cores. I do not believe the kernel has underclocking abilities currently, but I may be wrong. Definitely snappier with the kernel than without. The combination of the two is excellent.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do you know if the sticky mode works?
SightSeeker said:
Do you know if the sticky mode works?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My setting stay after rebooting so yes. I check with system tuner pro.
After flashing this kernel over Synergy 1.4, I have a blue led light that will not turn off. Any ideas?
Sent from my Galaxy S3 using xda app-developers app
12bravo said:
After flashing this kernel over Synergy 1.4, I have a blue led light that will not turn off. Any ideas?
Sent from my Galaxy S3 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You may have accidentally flashed the v12 of the kernel. On the thread on rootzwiki look under changelog and download v12.2 it should fix the LED issue.
Want to post in the synergy thread but now enough post counts -_-
Anyone can think of a compelling reason to not jump for synergy 1.4 with the lean kernel 12.2 and wait for synergy 1.5 instead? Eschelon made it sound like it would drop soon and I'm just trying to gauge from the comments on the synergy thread if there are major problems.....main things that bother me are battery life degradation claims and 4G speed variances.
Bonus: A tad off topic, but I was wondering if anyone running the synergy roms replaced their touchwiz apps with aosp apps? Reason I ask is because I cannot live without the ICS email client and prefer the messaging client as well.
Thanks for the heads up from everyone confirming the busybox issue with 1.4 to be compatible with 12.2 lean kernel.
sensui123 said:
Want to post in the synergy thread but now enough post counts -_-
Anyone can think of a compelling reason to not jump for synergy 1.4 with the lean kernel 12.2 and wait for synergy 1.5 instead? Eschelon made it sound like it would drop soon and I'm just trying to gauge from the comments on the synergy thread if there are major problems.....main things that bother me are battery life degradation claims and 4G speed variances.
Thanks for the heads up from everyone confirming the busybox issue with 1.4 to be compatible with 12.2 lean kernel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you want to play around with Google Now then go for 1.4. 1.5 will not require a wipe according to eschelon. I've found the battery life on 1.4 to be close to par with 1.3. Maybe a little more battery hungry, but not much.
Earl831SC said:
The battery saver from the script sets the max frequency on the cpus to 1134000. This can be changed in the script as well. I run the batter saver but change the max frequency to 1350000 for both cores. I do not believe the kernel has underclocking abilities currently, but I may be wrong. Definitely snappier with the kernel than without. The combination of the two is excellent.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I set cpu0 to 1350000, but I can't figure out how to set cpu1? I am new to kernels, can you tell me how you set the second cpu to 1350000?
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda app-developers app
tmar23 said:
I set cpu0 to 1350000, but I can't figure out how to set cpu1? I am new to kernels, can you tell me how you set the second cpu to 1350000?
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you are using the script it is option 4 to set max frequency for CPU1
Thanks, I had to force dual core mode for some reason, then it gave me the ability to change cpu1.
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda app-developers app

Best kernel for saving battery on 7.0?

I am on cm 10.1 and the battery isn't much different from stock. Also, the tab gets hotter than it did on stock. Any kernel that keeps the device cool and saves battery? I am willing to change ROMs if its CM's fault, but the ROM you suggest should be waaay better to convince me to change ROMs.
Sent from my GT-P3110 using xda app-developers app
blagginspaziyonokip said:
I am on cm 10.1 and the battery isn't much different from stock. Also, the tab gets hotter than it did on stock. Any kernel that keeps the device cool and saves battery? I am willing to change ROMs if its CM's fault, but the ROM you suggest should be waaay better to convince me to change ROMs.
Sent from my GT-P3110 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
not sure whether it's kernel or CM10.1's fault! But i don't like 4.2.x based roms just yet, they're just not stable enough for my liking.
I use AOKP Milestone 1 on my P3110 and i was using it last night and battery was on 7 days and blah blah blah with 47% battery left! Admiting i only use it about 4 hours each day!
blagginspaziyonokip said:
I am on cm 10.1 and the battery isn't much different from stock. Also, the tab gets hotter than it did on stock. Any kernel that keeps the device cool and saves battery? I am willing to change ROMs if its CM's fault, but the ROM you suggest should be waaay better to convince me to change ROMs.
Sent from my GT-P3110 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do you play games????
If not go to processor clock settings and underclock it to say 800,600 or less.
Your tab will not get hot and you will get better battery life!!!
Also you can try ketut kernel...
And about other Roms cm10.1 is best one after stock 4.1.2(debloated)
And device getting hot is normal.
squ89r97 said:
not sure whether it's kernel or CM10.1's fault! But i don't like 4.2.x based roms just yet, they're just not stable enough for my liking.
I use AOKP Milestone 1 on my P3110 and i was using it last night and battery was on 7 days and blah blah blah with 47% battery left! Admiting i only use it about 4 hours each day!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Am I gonna miss any features from 4.2.2 if I go back to 4.1.2 for AOKP?
Sent from my GT-P3110 using xda app-developers app
Droidlover123 said:
Do you play games????
If not go to processor clock settings and underclock it to say 800,600 or less.
Your tab will not get hot and you will get better battery life!!!
Also you can try ketut kernel...
And about other Roms cm10.1 is best one after stock 4.1.2(debloated)
And device getting hot is normal.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't always play the CPU intensive ones like Dead Trigger, GTA, they're all too big to download on my 200KBps speeds. I do play the 2D ones like Bike Race, will 600Mhz be stable enough?
Sent from my GT-P3110 using xda app-developers app
blagginspaziyonokip said:
I don't always play the CPU intensive ones like Dead Trigger, GTA, they're all too big to download on my 200KBps speeds. I do play the 2D ones like Bike Race, will 600Mhz be stable enough?
Sent from my GT-P3110 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Probably!!!
You can try.
And you will miss multi user,expanded mode,more ram ,separate notification bar
And btw who much speed you get on your 200KBps???
Droidlover123 said:
Probably!!!
You can try.
And you will miss multi user,expanded mode,more ram ,separate notification bar
And btw who much speed you get on your 200KBps???
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Bike Race runs fine at 300-600MHz. It still heats up quite a bit though.
Nobody else really uses my Tab but my mother for Candy Crush, and PIE doesn't even work. But since nobody else is recommending any more ROMs, it looks like I'll be stating on cm.
Sent from my GT-P3110 using xda app-developers app
blagginspaziyonokip said:
Bike Race runs fine at 300-600MHz. It still heats up quite a bit though.
Nobody else really uses my Tab but my mother for Candy Crush, and PIE doesn't even work. But since nobody else is recommending any more ROMs, it looks like I'll be stating on cm.
Sent from my GT-P3110 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok.
And how much download speed u get on your connection?????
Droidlover123 said:
Ok.
And how much download speed u get on your connection?????
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My regular speed which is about 200KBps, but sometimes downloads randomly stop andi have to turn off WiFi and turn it on again on the Tab.
Sent from my GT-P3110 using xda app-developers app

2nd core inactive

I just noticed that my second core is inactive on my g2x phone. Does any one know is this normal or my phone is malfunctioned? I downloaded this app name CPU Identifier and it shows my second core is inactive. I also did run a benchmark test on Quadrant and the score is around 1914 where as the normal score for g2x should be around 2500. Any help how to fix this would be appreciated.
App link? Would like to try it. Searched market didn't know which one
Sent from my LG-P999 using xda app-developers app
g2x
hippiesky said:
App link? Would like to try it. Searched market didn't know which one
Sent from my LG-P999 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Downloaded on Google play store, call CPU identifier.
g2x
g2xmytouch said:
Downloaded on Google play store, call CPU identifier.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
CPU/Ram/Device identifier by Davy Bartonloni.
Mine showed both working. Hmmm wonder what's wrong with yours
Sent from my LG-P999 using xda app-developers app
hippiesky said:
Mine showed both working. Hmmm wonder what's wrong with yours
Sent from my LG-P999 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Probably has malfunctioned due to overheated. the first core is showing 1998BMPS and the second is showing 0. I haven't done anything major to the phone since I brought it two years ago except rooted it. May be I will try different kernals. Hope that it will makes it work again.
What ROM are you using, op?
Sent from my LG-P999 using Tapatalk 2
erchclu brown
jpyumul said:
What ROM are you using, op?
Sent from my LG-P999 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Is the original one that came with the manufacture. I haven't changed anything since. Do you think that's the problem? How can I change rom on my phone?
g2xmytouch said:
Is the original one that came with the manufacture. I haven't changed anything since. Do you think that's the problem? How can I change rom on my phone?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm having the same issue. Did you try antutu? Mine works well with that app.
Sent from my LG-P999 using Tapatalk 2
jpyumul said:
I'm having the same issue. Did you try antutu? Mine works well with that app.
Sent from my LG-P999 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I hope that is not a hardware problem. I will try to install cyanogenMod to see if it can fix that.
Im currently running MIUI (SINGH UI) for the g2x and it also shows that my second core is down. Doesn't bother me though....I have not seen any drop in performance since I have originally rooted the phone and as far as overall speed is concerned I don't think my phone has ever been faster.
Pain-N-Panic said:
Im currently running MIUI (SINGH UI) for the g2x and it also shows that my second core is down. Doesn't bother me though....I have not seen any drop in performance since I have originally rooted the phone and as far as overall speed is concerned I don't think my phone has ever been faster.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Try Quadrant benchmark you will see how much has affected. The normal score should be around 2500 but now is around 1989. Also, now I can't play games that has 3d graphic.
That sucks man. Im not much of a gamer so it doesnt affect me much
Sent from my LG-P999 using xda premium
I guess the rom has something to do with it. I'm having problems with ICS and jb with quadrant. But with cm7 and a good kernel (faux123), my score reached almost 3000!
Sent from my LG-P999 using Tapatalk 2
I checked and my 2nd core is also inactive, now i understand why my g2x has been slower. Does anyone know how to fix this, without changing my ROM? I'm running Hellfire sandwich 1.9, faux 123-050 kernel
someone please help
Pain-N-Panic said:
That sucks man. Im not much of a gamer so it doesnt affect me much
Sent from my LG-P999 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hey thanks for pointing out the second core was inactive as well as the other minor bug of the date an time resetting. Adressing these issues, do you think another release will be made with fixes. I love this rom personally i think its more interactive with its user interface an adjustable themes.
My performance was lowered.. wait with the 2nd core inactive is deep sleep even possible? I noticed a minor battery drain with the wifi... thinking its just me..
Sent from my LG-P999 using xda app-developers app
Zombienick420 said:
Hey thanks for pointing out the second core was inactive as well as the other minor bug of the date an time resetting. Adressing these issues, do you think another release will be made with fixes. I love this rom personally i think its more interactive with its user interface an adjustable themes.
My performance was lowered.. wait with the 2nd core inactive is deep sleep even possible? I noticed a minor battery drain with the wifi... thinking its just me..
Sent from my LG-P999 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Where can you get an update on the ROM? From the manufacturer?
jpyumul said:
I guess the rom has something to do with it. I'm having problems with ICS and jb with quadrant. But with cm7 and a good kernel (faux123), my score reached almost 3000!
Sent from my LG-P999 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You mean on CM7 the 2nd core is active?
g2xmytouch said:
Where can you get an update on the ROM? From the manufacturer?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I guess so. Only GB are stable with this phone. I always tried going 4.0+, no luck. I'm just ended up back with GB.
Sent from my LG-P999 using Tapatalk 2
jpyumul said:
I guess so. Only GB are stable with this phone. I always tried going 4.0+, no luck. I'm just ended up back with GB.
Sent from my LG-P999 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Have u try to Cm7 yet? If u already hv let me know so i can crossout that option.

lg g4 warms easily

So I have had this for about two days well the first day it got really hot around the camera an topper screen portion so hot holding just was a no an it was just doing normal task no apps installed just browsing so I factory reset it an that helped but not completely
So I then rooted to see if I could change kernel settings well it looks like my cores are almost always running at max speed so I downloaded kernel auditor to change setting an that still always want to go to maximum clock speed so I so I lowered it an it was still just at maximum 90% of the time So I disabled some cores bringing cpu temp down to around 94/96 degrees Fahrenheit is this normal or is it just me
Sorry for scrub questions I only had a s4 before this which was much less complicated
Thanks in advance sorry if I was confusing
Maybe there are some app running in background..try checking the usage manager, ..using bloatware tool also helping it to cool down
tryed it
faizalotai said:
Maybe there are some app running in background..try checking the usage manager, ..using bloatware tool also helping it to cool down
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Tried safe mode an deleted a lot of bloat an it's just almost always like this except when screen off
Can you post screen shot of kernel auditor's frequency table? both of them..bigLittle
For me it was a circle case widget which was causing it to heat up. I used CPU monitor and found it. Closed that and it is fine since.
Sent from my VS986 using XDA Free mobile app
Little cores
faizalotai said:
Maybe there are some app running in background..try checking the usage manager, ..using bloatware tool also helping it to cool down
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So I was looking an it won't let me list the screen shot but the little cores seem to push pass the limit just by touching the screen it will raise the maximum an minimum to 1248 then when I'm not settings go to normal
so that happened
adi_vastava said:
For me it was a circle case widget which was causing it to heat up. I used CPU monitor and found it. Closed that and it is fine since.
Sent from my VS986 using XDA Free mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So I disabled the smart circle case thing an now it's better like ok
dsilx said:
So I disabled the smart circle case thing an now it's better like ok
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Alright good to know. You can try running CPU monitor app and see what is taking most of the CPU.
Sent from my VS986 using XDA Free mobile app
yeah
adi_vastava said:
Alright good to know. You can try running CPU monitor app and see what is taking most of the CPU.
Sent from my VS986 using XDA Free mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can I give me a list of system apps I can delete
dsilx said:
Can I give me a list of system apps I can delete
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You can refer to this
ok
faizalotai said:
Can you post screen shot of kernel auditor's frequency table? both of them..bigLittle
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Okit wouldn't let me add the picture so here's a link Screenshot_2015-08-14-10-32-17.png - https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B1amLS5fOK4ONUdVbk1UZEhRbDg/view?usp=docslist_api
I also have problems as above and unresolved
I've been playing with kernel settings for a week now
so far i've noticed something regarding battery life (SOT) and its temperature
If i set big cpu to ondemand and LITTLE to interactive(default) the battery life stays much longer but the phone feel hot..
then if i set big to interactive and LITTLE to ondemand, the phone itself doesn't heat much but the battery life became poor..
and if you noticed, big cpu seldoms reach more than 384mhz..that's most of the time it stays in lowest of it frequency table
Maybe we can experimenting it together and discuss about it here

Categories

Resources