Running Android 4.3 on VMWare Workstation - Android General

I tried running it on Virtualbox but it didn't go well so here is Android 4.3 running on VMware Workstation.
Download 4.3 from http://android-x86.org

chronic8000 said:
I tried running it on Virtualbox but it didn't go well so here is Android 4.3 running on VMware Workstation.
Download 4.3 from http://android-x86.org
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Was this just a clean install from the .iso into VMWare? I'm guessing android-x86-4.3-20130725.iso from http://www.android-x86.org/download

Yes with the modification at boot to make it 1080p. Need to work out the best DPI for it though.
Running on virtual box but not well.

Anyone knows how to rotate screen there? often the game rotates it and then it becomes unusable as mouse directions also reverse.

Candoris said:
Anyone knows how to rotate screen there? often the game rotates it and then it becomes unusable as mouse directions also reverse.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I know this might be a bit late but I found holding F9-F12 works to force a set rotation.

VirtualBox is working fine. But where i'm very interested is the USB pass-through. I wonder how it performs vs VBox one.
I also know VMware got a virtual USB sniffer. It could be awesome to emulate/create/debug/use custom USB devices.
In example, i'm using an USBAudio sound card. Due to the actual limitation of Android, i'm not able to adress it from SDK (sadly !) and i must do from NDK. VirtualBox fails miserably when i try to open my USBAudio class device (the VM is crashing).
Does you USB devices are working with VMWare ?

Got success installing android 4.6 on a VMware 9. The problem is Apps installing.
I can install apps (.apk) from the internet like SnapPea but not from my computer (no explore) although I modified Android.vmx
Code:
ethernet0.virtualDev = "e1000" to "vlance"
Any idea?

Related

how to make a rom PART 1.5 (w/ and w/out virtualaztion)

THANK YOU JOHAN DE KONING
This will explain how to make your computer fast enough to run ubuntu (a form of Linux). And how to download the android package. This will take up 7 to 8 gb of space.
THIS IS FOR PEOPLE WHO WANT UBUNTU (NOT VIRTUAL AND NOT DUAL IF DON'T WANT TO BE)*This could delete windows if you didn't partion your hard drive right
NOT FOR NOOBS BE WARNED
Go to the ubunutu download page given below and download the 700 mb iso image file. Iso is a cd formatted file u can open it with a zip appclation(but don't). When it is finished I recommand getting a dvd but maybe it could fit on a cd.(*Note that you don't have to burn on to cd u could extract to decktop and run the setup manually.) Burn the ubuntu on to the cd/dvd and than restart your computer with the cd/dvd still in the computer's cd/dvd rom. When the computer goes to a blink screen and asks you if want to boot from cd/dvd press enter. And than from here on follow the instractions.
STEP 1 (CLEAN COMPUTER)
*Note: for performance do this in safe mode.
First we need to make your computer fast as possible. Create a backup just in case you want to back up something. So go to download.com and download Advanced SystemCare Free(7 -10 mb). After you have installed click on the CARE! button to get started. This could depend on your computer usage space the bigger the longer it will take. It will wipe all internet data. If you don't want that to happen just go to maintain windows and click on the Privacy Sweep box to uncheck. Than scan. Than go to utilities and run all the following Disk Check, Disk Cleaner and install Smart defrag. After installing Smart Defrag click start on all the options in this order defrag only, deep optimize, and fast optimize.
STEP 2: RESTART COMPUTER
After restarting go back to System FreeCare and run game booster(install). Click game mode and a pop up will show. Click the button on the left side of the box. Check all boxes but not explore. than go to game mode.
STEP 3: Download virtualbox(68 mb download)
You could have a dual if you want. The download page is http://www.virtualbox.org/wiki/Downloads. Download the correct version. (windows= *VirtualBox 3.0.4 for Windows hosts x86/amd64). than install it.
Install Virtualbox(takes from 5-30 minutes depending on your computer)
Next>accept>next>next>next>yes>install>continue anyway(i got this like 6 times so...)>finish(i think)>cancel>new>Next>name=ubuntu>next>Next>Next>Next>Next>Next>
when u get to the virtual size thing move the bar to 7.5 gb (min). this should be a little extra space. Next>Finish>Next>
STEP 4: Download UBUNTU(700 mb)
DOWNLOAD PAGE http://www.ubuntu.com/getubuntu/download and choose the ftp. than begin downloading. After download save the file to desktop and DON'T DO ANYTHING. go to the VirtualBox and click CD/DVD-ROM. Check the box and also ISO IMAGE FILE after that and mount to that image on the desktop. THAN OK. press CTRL+ALT+DELETE. go to processes and end explore(for speed). Click Start.
PART 2
OK. START by running VirtualBox with the mount on the ISO ubuntu and than click start on the top right hand side. press enter to leave language than enter again to install ubuntu. on the top of the bar it may pause alot so go to machine and resume it. if it total doesn't work just exit and power down and reboot with explore.exe gone and also no windows up and running. and than just follow the instructions to installing it about 1 hour to 2 hours depending. Make sure that it is completely partation to the virtual drive. After like forever when u reach the main desktop go to app... terminal and make sure u knoe your password. Than type
The rest is here http://www.johandekoning.nl/index.php/2009/06/07/building-android-15-build-environment/. How to bulid the enviroment and getting the libs and other tools together. After all that run.
Sudo apt-get autoremove
Sudo apt-get autoclean
Than on Saturday and Sunday I will teach u how to make a rom.
There is a kernel problem with johan's idea I think I know what it is
Was going to wipe one of my computers anyway. This gives me a reason to stop procrastinating! Will give this a try. Waiting for part 2!
I know I will never get into rom making but it is very interesting to read about.
P.S. Make the paypal link a bit bigger, I can't read it
I already turned my back on windows so I run ubuntu so this is useless to me but I am waiting for part 2 so I can learn more about this, prob won't ever use it but it is good to knowhow to
Already running Mint in VB .. runs just great. I am interested in reading the ROM part though
WTF? Why do you need to do all of this crap on your computer to run Ubuntu? If I was going to dual boot with windows I would not use the stuff you listed. Why not just explain how to use it create a ROM and let people figure out how to get Ubuntu on their computer.
this seems more like spam, an advertisement for those products he listed. Any sensible person would not use virtual box to build android from source (problems you run into with the jvm running out of memory).
Besides, Johan already has a well posted blog about this:
http://www.johandekoning.nl/index.php/2009/06/07/building-android-15-build-environment/
but I would really recomend installing ubuntu through the windows installer (wubi) if you're a linux virgin, that way you don't risk anything in your windows partition, it's faster than virtualization, and eventually you'll drop windows once you learn how to use ubuntu at least.
Really, I think this is spam though.
jubeh said:
Really, I think this is spam though.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think you are right. I don't know if "part 2" is ever going to come, or if it will just be a copy/paste from the link you posted.
Wasn't it simpler to just install ubuntu as second os? If someone wants to dedicate himself to developement it would be better to have ubuntu not virtualized
jubeh said:
this seems more like spam, an advertisement for those products he listed. Any sensible person would not use virtual box to build android from source (problems you run into with the jvm running out of memory).
Besides, Johan already has a well posted blog about this:
http://www.johandekoning.nl/index.php/2009/06/07/building-android-15-build-environment/
but I would really recomend installing ubuntu through the windows installer (wubi) if you're a linux virgin, that way you don't risk anything in your windows partition, it's faster than virtualization, and eventually you'll drop windows once you learn how to use ubuntu at least.
Really, I think this is spam though.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am not sure if you have ever tried virtual box but it is quite responsive and seems too run better than wubi. I am sure it depends somewhat on the system a person is running, but with a quad and 4 gb of ram VB runs very well. While I have a dual boot with Ubuntu , I have still found it easier to do my android stuff in it's own virtual space. With a dedicated 75gb I can use it seamlessly with my Windows 7 install. You should try it it really works very well and I have had no memory problems at all and have manged to build from source without any difficulty whatsoever. My Ubuntu install stays clean and I can mess with my virtual Mint install as much as I like without ever affecting my Ubuntu partition.
Personally I have Ubuntu on a Prtition of My portable drive,which means I can boot it up anywhere (so long as the computer can USB Boot). I shall certainly be following the original info. The same guy has posted many good Android Articles.
As for the OP here, he only really needed to post a link, not copy the whole thing.
pixel-painter said:
I am not sure if you have ever tried virtual box but it is quite responsive and seems too run better than wubi. I am sure it depends somewhat on the system a person is running, but with a quad and 4 gb of ram VB runs very well. While I have a dual boot with Ubuntu , I have still found it easier to do my android stuff in it's own virtual space. With a dedicated 75gb I can use it seamlessly with my Windows 7 install. You should try it it really works very well and I have had no memory problems at all and have manged to build from source without any difficulty whatsoever. My Ubuntu install stays clean and I can mess with my virtual Mint install as much as I like without ever affecting my Ubuntu partition.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Almost everything runs well with quad processors and 4GB of RAM. Oracle 10g runs well with that hardware. So that isn't saying much.
miketaylor00 said:
Oracle 10g runs well with that hardware. So that isn't saying much.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ha! this bit gave me a chuckle.
I freaking hate Oracle. I run a bunch of dbms' & 95% of my headaches come from them.
I prefer dual-booting, personally. I just started messing around with ubuntu (about 6 months maybe) and i love it, after using ubuntu i fully hate Windows Vista and all its sparkly, money-making horse-****. So now i have ubuntu and Windows both running smoothly on a compaq presario f700 laptop, and the only thing i really use my windows partition (i know thats not the correct technical terminology, just pay attention to the story) for is, well, basically just theming, and media storage. I use photoshop, and havent bothered to try using GIMP very much yet, and so i do all my theming (which isnt much really) in windows, which is where i also already have the autosign tools and draw9patch and other such things setup...and then all my music, pictures, whatever are all on my fat32 partition, and can all be accessed from either OS. aside from that, my computer boots into ubuntu by default. so if im using my computer, im doin it the ubuntu way, unless i NEED to use windows, for something like photoshop, and thats about it.
So long story short...(like its not already to late for that) im eagerly awaiting part 2 cuz ive been hitting some roadblocks...hope it helps!
-BMFC
mohsinkhan47 said:
Please donate and help me get a good ubuntu desktop from the case to the motherboard. Please donat.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'll get right on that. Is $500 enough?
miketaylor00 said:
Almost everything runs well with quad processors and 4GB of RAM. Oracle 10g runs well with that hardware. So that isn't saying much.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok Granted u are right about that and so it should.
But assuming I am not the only person with a quad and 4 gb of RAM, this may work just as well for others too. As as a relative newb with Linux, I can honestly say I have killed a few installations of Linux on my Hard Drive by breaking packages and other things that prevent it from working properly. Sometimes it is easier for me to reinstall the whole thing because I lack the knowledge to fix it.... in comes Virtual Box. I can totally screw it up as much as I want and my Linux partition on my hd remains intact with no errors.
pixel-painter said:
I am not sure if you have ever tried virtual box but it is quite responsive and seems too run better than wubi. I am sure it depends somewhat on the system a person is running, but with a quad and 4 gb of ram VB runs very well. While I have a dual boot with Ubuntu , I have still found it easier to do my android stuff in it's own virtual space. With a dedicated 75gb I can use it seamlessly with my Windows 7 install. You should try it it really works very well and I have had no memory problems at all and have manged to build from source without any difficulty whatsoever. My Ubuntu install stays clean and I can mess with my virtual Mint install as much as I like without ever affecting my Ubuntu partition.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I do have virtualbox running on my linux box, my laptop's ubuntu side, and my laptop's win7 side. I also have a third computer that I have loaded with windows vista for the computer illiterate people in my house and a tiny dell mini 9 that I bought god-knows-why.
My main computer (since I can take it anywhere and my linux box i use mainly as a file server) is a gateway fx p-7805u. I won't have you google the specs, it's a 2.27 Ghz core 2 duo, 4 gb of ram, 320 gb main hard drive (plus I tossed a slow 5400 rpm 500 gb hd for files), so yeah, I can run virtualbox, but I mainly use it for running micro-xp on it for whatever else I need it.
I've used vb before like i said even configuring the vm with dual core support but there's no way it's as fast as a native system.
Anyway, wubi is not virtualization. It's an actual, loop-mounted image file/partition that fully utilizes the hardware it runs on. It's exactly the same as running a dual-booted system through partitioning, the only difference is that the ubuntu filesystem exists inside your ntfs partition rather than it's own partition, this has the effect of having a very slight hit on disk performance (much less than virtualization though), but everything else is running natively, even drivers. It's entirely safe for your host file-system and can be removed leaving no residual files anywhere on your system. It's also easy to share files with your host computer (with vb you have to set up a network share and then edit your /etc/init.d/rc.local to have it automount on startup, with wubi, it automatically creates a link to the host filesystem located at /host).
I've had to leave my computer building on vb overnight and then I come back to find that the process is stuck at some dex or java compilation, with an actual running system, this doesn't happen.
Give it a try, it costs nothing.
mohsinkhan47 said:
U guys are evil
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wow thanks! I really appreciate your work and considering donating to you. Since you make your paypal link so large, it really inspires me to donate.
Thanks again!
edit: (hope this post isn't considered to be spam like the original post is)
Better if you do
sudo apt-get autoremove --purge
jubeh said:
I do have virtualbox running on my linux box, my laptop's ubuntu side, and my laptop's win7 side. I also have a third computer that I have loaded with windows vista for the computer illiterate people in my house and a tiny dell mini 9 that I bought god-knows-why.
My main computer (since I can take it anywhere and my linux box i use mainly as a file server) is a gateway fx p-7805u. I won't have you google the specs, it's a 2.27 Ghz core 2 duo, 4 gb of ram, 320 gb main hard drive (plus I tossed a slow 5400 rpm 500 gb hd for files), so yeah, I can run virtualbox, but I mainly use it for running micro-xp on it for whatever else I need it.
I've used vb before like i said even configuring the vm with dual core support but there's no way it's as fast as a native system.
Anyway, wubi is not virtualization. It's an actual, loop-mounted image file/partition that fully utilizes the hardware it runs on. It's exactly the same as running a dual-booted system through partitioning, the only difference is that the ubuntu filesystem exists inside your ntfs partition rather than it's own partition, this has the effect of having a very slight hit on disk performance (much less than virtualization though), but everything else is running natively, even drivers. It's entirely safe for your host file-system and can be removed leaving no residual files anywhere on your system. It's also easy to share files with your host computer (with vb you have to set up a network share and then edit your /etc/init.d/rc.local to have it automount on startup, with wubi, it automatically creates a link to the host filesystem located at /host).
I've had to leave my computer building on vb overnight and then I come back to find that the process is stuck at some dex or java compilation, with an actual running system, this doesn't happen.
Give it a try, it costs nothing.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for the info... now I know you have a lot of computers in your household But seriously, I am not trying to put anyone's opinion down here... so there is no need to be quite so elitist I am just pointing out my own experiences with Virtual Box which have been very good. If it doesn't work for you... fine.. but you are suggesting to everyone else that it doesn't work properly or well and I can quite definitively say that yes it does.. and very well too.
I would imagine that your system from what you say may not be powerful enough to handle it as well... so maybe a quad is needed to make it run the way it does for me, I don't profess to know the answer... only that it works great on my system.. it is not slow.... does not have errors and compiles Android source quite easily using Mint Linux (another Debian based Linux Distro for those that are unfamiliar with it)
I don't think I ever mentioned it was as fast as a native system... all I am saying is that it runs well and for a noob it can be run without messing anything else up as it runs in it's own little environment.

Android on Pc

This is probably not the right place for this. but I would like to put android on my pc. I know its possible. It wont work on my 64bit machine. but i tried on an older desktop and it starts to work, but boot loops at android screen.
Since android is designed for ARM, and no x86 you'll need to look into a project like, http://www.android-x86.org/ . May I ask why you want android on a PC though? Just run a regular linux distro. Check out Ubuntu it's probably the easiest/straight forward distro you can get.
(Personally I run gentoo, but it's not a good intro to linux)
i heard that android doesn't support external screens. i run it off virtualbox and it runs great. i think you can set it up to dual boot through virtualbox or vmware.
I've had android running on several x86 machines installed straight to the hard drive even hooked up to a 46 inch ldc tv. These were p3/p4 machines with intel chip sets. I have to say it isn't all that great with out a touch screen.
Sent from my Droid using XDA App
really? i ran into problems when i installed it. it would boot then the screen would blank after the android boot screen. on my one computer it hangs on the install in the middle of listing devices.
zenstitution said:
really? i ran into problems when i installed it. it would boot then the screen would blank after the android boot screen. on my one computer it hangs on the install in the middle of listing devices.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Did you have an Intel chipset? Intel graphics? I don't believe it works with nvidia/ati.
at the moment Android x86 does NOT work for anything but intel *of course unless your using vmware, or vbox*
however...
If you can find buildable drivers for your hardware, you can just build and 'cook' it, just like we do for the hero, and KAZAM! Works.
If anybody has some prebuilt nvidia drivers hook me up! I wanna see how fast it can go (cause framebuffer sucks..)
i would like to do it too!

Android PC?

I am wondering if anyone knows of any way or if someone is working on a way to get ICS or JB to boot on a home-built PC? My PC is AMD 64, 8G RAM, etc. I have seen some instructions online, but they failed to mention that you must have a certain laptop or tablet. I would like to be able to tri-boot Android and run it whenever I feel like (probably use it the most). Thank you for any input.
Massive overkill. Why not simply run VMware and stick Android in a virtual machine?
android-x86
There is a project called "android-x86" - this might help you.
I tried android-x86. That is where I found out after several failures that you can only use a handful of specific Lenovo devices to boot into Android. Apparently there is a way to use Android 1.6, but who wants that.
As far as the overkill thing. Well I did build it as a workhorse PC. And I could run VM. But I would rather boot into it. I think it would be great for average tasks.
How difficult would it be to make it work for myself from AOSP?
Kernel build, hardware support etc. That's why I just run a VM for mime when I want to play. Also means I can access all my synched days such as SMS messages easily on my PC.
Sent from the darkest corner of my mind.

Bosch Emulator On Jailbroken Windows 8.1 RT?

I've jailbroken my Surface 2 running Windows 8.1 RT and have started downloading and using apps, it's so much better, although I did think they'd install but they just run like portable apps, is that how it's supposed to be?
But that aside, my main query is what's the easiest way to achieve a full operating system on Windows RT? I've downloaded Bosch emulator because it's still being developed whereas QEmu isn't. I installed Bosch on my Surface and downloaded the Linux disk image from http://bochs.sourceforge.net/diskimages.html
Now from here how do I make the emulator run it? I've gone to the start menu, edited the 'Disk & Boot' option to enable ATA Channel 0, checked 'Enable this device' on First HD/CD on channel 0' and browsed to the downloaded .img file to input into the 'Path or physical device name'.
Then once I click Start I get a Panic popup with the message: couldn't open ROM image file'(null)/B....
Anybody else experienced this and have a way around it? I would have thought seeing as I downloaded the file from their website it would be fine.
If no-one has experienced this or has a fix, is there an easier way to emulate a full system?
Thank you
Jailbreak Windows RT on Surface? How?
Like this
banjax said:
Jailbreak Windows RT on Surface? How?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://forum.xda-developers.com/win...ent/windows-8-1-rt-jailbreak-exploit-t3226835

How to get correct working navigation GPS operation in a Android emulators

I am trying to get an android emulator working on my new windows 10 pc.
I have tried just about every free and evaluation only type android emulators that I can find but I can't get any of them to pickup the gps data being generated by my windows 10 machine. Many emulators claim that gps is supported how ever none of them have worked for me. I have tried all the of possible fix's that I have been able to find on the internet. I have tried all of the "location" setting that are available to me on both the windows side and also the emulator side .
Are there any more good solutions I can try? I can't help feel that I am simply missing something that should be obvious to me. I also suspect that a 64 bit system would work a lot better. Unfortunate I did not notice that this new insignia brand computer was a 32-bit only machine when I bought it.
This new pc and its internal gps work just fine when in a win10 only navigation test.
Is there anyway to get this working normally on any android emulator ?
My computer is 32-bit UEFI with windows 10. My internal windows gps is a "Broadcom GNSS 4752 Geolocation Sensor"
Hope some kind person might be able to help me?
Thanks very much in advance!
Allleyooop.
I am trying to get an android emulator working on my new windows 10 pc.
I believe the app called gpsgate would be one way to get this working. However the server app on the windows side requires a 64 bit system, unfortunately mine is only a 32 bit...
alleyoopishere1 said:
I am trying to get an android emulator working on my new windows 10 pc.
I have tried just about every free and evaluation only type android emulators that I can find but I can't get any of them to pickup the gps data being generated by my windows 10 machine. Many emulators claim that gps is supported how ever none of them have worked for me. I have tried all the of possible fix's that I have been able to find on the internet. I have tried all of the "location" setting that are available to me on both the windows side and also the emulator side .
Are there any more good solutions I can try? I can't help feel that I am simply missing something that should be obvious to me. I also suspect that a 64 bit system would work a lot better. Unfortunate I did not notice that this new insignia brand computer was a 32-bit only machine when I bought it.
This new pc and its internal gps work just fine when in a win10 only navigation test.
Is there anyway to get this working normally on any android emulator ?
My computer is 32-bit UEFI with windows 10. My internal windows gps is a "Broadcom GNSS 4752 Geolocation Sensor"
Hope some kind person might be able to help me?
Thanks very much in advance!
Allleyooop.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse

Categories

Resources