UNTESTED! You have to be brave enough to try this kernel
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Only for cm-10.1-20130217-NIGHTLY or newer
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Flash attached files using the latest CWM recovery at your own risk. Still not found a way to lock the CPU @ 1.08GHz on boot, the OC version max frequency 1.2GHz for now and GPU clock 384MHz by default.
Using CyanogenMod's android_kernel_samsung_espresso10 by codeworkx, the newer Samsung's JB kernel update and KK-Boot's patch applied
LZO compressed boot image and kernel for faster decompression
Performance governor on boot, interactive after boot completed for faster boot
ROW as the default scheduler
"Sleep too deep" bug free of course
Waiting for your review, do not forget to press my thanks button or better my DTM button
EDIT: I will upload the patch, so P51xx owner can compile it from source, test it and write some feedbacks.
Kernel patch attached.
All attachments on OP removed. I will upload the patch, so P51xx owner can compile it from source, test it and write some feedbacks.
After updating CM 10.1 kernel for P31xx, time for me to upload espresso/espresso10 kernel patch as I have promised: find it in post #2.
Instructions would be nice
How about making max CPU frequency 1480 MHz? And GPU at 512 ?
its Stable on 4.2.1 with those freq
Sent from my GT-P5113 using xda premium
rap3rman said:
How about making max CPU frequency 1480 MHz? And GPU at 512 ?
its Stable on 4.2.1 with those freq
Sent from my GT-P5113 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Isn't it 1420 Hz?
Aokp kernel worked for me at that speed.
Sent from my GT-P5110
How can a normal person flash this kernel? I tried to flash the zip and it wouldn't let me. It doesn't detect any of the patch files.
Thanks.
Sent from my GT-P5110 using Tapatalk 2
Someone still has to patch the kernel and upload it. The files attached are the patch
Sent from my CM 10.1 powered GT-P5113
thanks for your patch, when i apply it :
Code:
patch: **** malformed patch at line 100866: suspend) __end_pci_fixups_suspend = .; } .builtin_fw : AT(ADDR(.builtin_fw) - 0) { __start_builtin_fw = .; *(.builtin_fw) __end_builtin_fw = .; } .rio_ops : AT(ADDR(.rio_ops) - 0) { __start_rio_switch_ops = .; *(.rio_switch_ops) __end_rio_switch_ops = .; } __ksymtab : AT(ADDR(__ksymtab) - 0) { __start___ksymtab = .; *(SORT(___ksymtab+*)) __stop___ksymtab = .; } __ksymtab_gpl : AT(ADDR(__ksymtab_gpl) - 0) { __start___ksymtab_gpl = .; *(SORT(___ksymtab_gpl+*)) __stop___ksymtab_gpl = .; } __ksymtab_unused : AT(ADDR(__ksymtab_unused) - 0) { __start___ksymtab_unused = .; *(SORT(___ksymtab_unused+*)) __stop___ksymtab_unused = .; } __ksymtab_unused_gpl : AT(ADDR(__ksymtab_unused_gpl) - 0) { __start___ksymtab_unused_gpl = .; *(SORT(___ksymtab_unused_gpl+*)) __stop___ksymtab_unused_gpl = .; } __ksymtab_gpl_future : AT(ADDR(__ksymtab_gpl_future) - 0) { __start___ksymtab_gpl_future = .; *(SORT(___ksymtab_gpl_future+*)) __stop___ksymtab_gpl_future = .; } __kcrctab : AT(ADDR(__kcrctab) - 0) { __start___kcrctab = .; *(
any idea?
The patch produced by diff. Please try removing the malformed part first (you can manually merge it later), I'm sure the others patch will work without problem because I checked it line by line. Latest Kompare not always work as expected to check a patch integrity
ketut.kumajaya said:
The patch produced by diff. Please try removing the malformed part first (you can manually merge it later), I'm sure the others patch will work without problem because I checked it line by line. Latest Kompare not always work as expected to check a patch integrity
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes other patch worked without issue , i took cm kernel as base without edit i ll try again tomorow to dowload again and apply !
sevenup30 said:
Yes other patch worked without issue , i took cm kernel as base without edit i ll try again tomorow to dowload again and apply !
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You can always build a kernel from source. But if you want to try out the performance right now, download it from the first page. As usual, have not tested it since I do not have an access to P51xx. Maybe you could be a tester Waiting for your feedback and good luck with your ROM. Maybe one day I'll ask you to port it to P31xx
Well, I build kernel with your patch except the first 00-samsung.... as expected it bootloop, in fact it do not pass Samsung Splashscreen, but adb is working.
I'm trying atm to build only with OC and governor patch.
I'll be honored to be your eyes on this, i do not have the skill to edit kernel source, but i can build and patch for you
So if you want to make an OC kernel for my rom let me know
edit::
I tried build only with OC&Governor patch.
It boot, but OC do not work, still stock frequencies.
The default frequency 1.008GHz. My flashable zip from post #1 is a good reference how to overclock the CPU. CM has a performance setting page or you can use third party CPU clock setting (i.e. No-frills CPU Control). Every device has a different CPU characteristics. I'm trying to make a safe kernel for all devices. Users can then do the settings according to the CPU's capability gradually. No need to build different kernel for different target frequency, it's waste our precise time Sometime my English limitation limited me to explain what is in my head
I've installed latest CM10.1 M2 from today and after that put on the blackhawk 0.2-oc kernel.
Running stable now on min 800 and max 1350 MHz.
I've got a P5110.
Thanx for the great work!
Grtz,
John
ketut.kumajaya said:
The default frequency 1.008GHz. My flashable zip from post #1 is a good reference how to overclock the CPU. CM has a performance setting page or you can use third party CPU clock setting (i.e. No-frills CPU Control). Every device has a different CPU characteristics. I'm trying to make a safe kernel for all devices. Users can then do the settings according to the CPU's capability gradually.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
P5100. Works great, thanks a lot. Tested by Antutu. Got 8200 pts @1420MHz. Normal score @1000MHz: around 6100 pts.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my GT-P5100 using Tapatalk HD
John_Br said:
I've installed latest CM10.1 M2 from today and after that put on the blackhawk 0.2-oc kernel.
Running stable now on min 800 and max 1350 MHz.
I've got a P5110.
Thanx for the great work!
Grtz,
John
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Rated RR said:
P5100. Works great, thanks a lot. Tested by Antutu. Got 8200 pts @1420MHz. Normal score @1000MHz: around 6100 pts.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for both of you for your confirmation.
I deleted the first version because people started downloading (30+) and none of them confirm it really works. It certainly is not helping developers to create something and it's not good for all of you.
Confirmed working too. Rock solid @ 1200. Haven't tried higher yet.
Antutu spat out 7630 or so.
So far it feels much smoother. Even at stock speeds.
Sent from my ME865 using Tapatalk 2
lukensteinz said:
Confirmed working too. Rock solid @ 1200. Haven't tried higher yet.
Antutu spat out 7630 or so.
So far it feels much smoother. Even at stock speeds.
Sent from my ME865 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Even on stock CPU clock, your GPU overclocked to 384MHz when needed and immediately down. No power drain effect!
Related
Notice : I don't have this phone and did this as a favor to you guys. Please consider a donation if you are able.
Features added:
Interactive Governer
Ext4 file system
Tun.ko
Overclocking up to 864mhz.
Packaged in koush's anykernel for compatibility with any rom.
AS ALWAYS MAKE A NANDROID BACKUP 1st!
Flash with custom recovery. This is a beta run also. Speeds above 800mhz may be unstable for many people so find the speed that works best for you as all processors are unique due to construction imperfections.
Overclocking Notes:
Not all phones can OC and can handle the same speeds. Your phone is unique. Some can go up to 864mhz stable some can only do 729mhz and some can't at all.
Overclocking must be done with setcpu. After each boot/reboot the max is set to 600mhz to keep you from getting in a boot loop with an unstable speed for your device. To change it after reboot you must move the slider in setcpu to get the overclock freq to set above 600mhz. Do not use the set on boot feature of setcpu.
signed_thunderg_oc_beta_gnm.zip
My Kernel Source
Rom makers please don't use this in rom but direct users here.
great job! will try it later ... thanks!
drellisdee u da man heh.. succesfully flashed the kernal now..my phone is so very responsive..clocked at apx 600 mhz min and a superb 768 mhz. on different profiles of course...damn wheres the donate button?
cheersssss.
do 3d game now run faste and better with an overclocked cpu ??
MikeD215 said:
drellisdee u da man heh.. succesfully flashed the kernal now..my phone is so very responsive..clocked at apx 600 mhz min and a superb 768 mhz. on different profiles of course...damn wheres the donate button?
cheersssss.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Donate link is in my signature. Thanks as I maybe got 3 donations out of the whole optimus lineup of recoveries and thousands of downloads.
damns ...guys this man is doing very involved work..surely I know an you know this is anything but easy and time consuming ..added that he doesn't have the phone to test on..that's enough to support. if we want cool stuff in the future throw a bone
it goes along way I know time is tiff but..
thanks again.
help
hi man...first of all thank you for your job...can you post a link or a small how to about the kernel flash?
incredible ... I'm noticing a very high increase in performance. I set the cpu to 768 mhz and is stable ... but how can I tell what is the limit? will donate on paypal for your great work! (google translate)
imapjonny said:
do 3d game now run faste and better with an overclocked cpu ??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
games are much faster!!!!!!!!!!!
AWESOME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I have flashed AmberHome on my p500,can i flash this file simply entering in recovery mode and flashing it?lose i any file?
806 stable
did you undervolt it?
peolo001 said:
I have flashed AmberHome on my p500,can i flash this file simply entering in recovery mode and flashing it?lose i any file?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes and No
drellisdee: working fine. Thank you
Yes and No?
How do i do? (bad english )
peolo001 said:
Yes and No?
How do i do? (bad english )
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i think yes it's for the first question and no it's for the second question...but i'm not sure!!!
Frequency set to 787Mhz (stabil)
Games are still laggin while holding finger on display...
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Keep up the good job drellisdee ! Very nice!
Is there a way to set start frequency at 700+ Mhz? Or i have to change it every time with set cpu? Ty in advance
Wextercz said:
Frequency set to 787Mhz (stabil)
Games are still laggin while holding finger on display...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
you need to do the jit and hw accel tweaks too to get that quadrant up. The finger lag seems like a hardware defect or maybe a buggy touchscreen driver from lg.
i have JIT and HW Acc enabled all the time.
Lol, I did +1350 @ Quadrant with my ROM.
Now this is a screenshot:
Hello,
Before start working on the kernel 3.0 branch, I think we should have a good kernel for CM10A4 because 3.0 would take a while. So, I created this kernel.
Release:
Final - Jan 2, 2013
This is the final release. Only minor optimization are included. Dhiru already patched all necessary code to his kernel. I though about backporting DSSCOMP and ION but it seems not worth it. From now on I'll focus on the 3.0 branch. Happy new year to all. :laugh:
R1 - Dec 28, 2012
Overclock to 1.35GHz but boot at stock (Vurrut)
No signal fixed (loSconosciuto)
Noop, CFQ, SIO schedulers
Various governors
Based on Dhiru CM10 kernel
How to flash:
- Download it to your storage
- Reboot to recovery
- Flash it as a zip file.
How to restore to stock:
Download and flash "kernel-cm-10-A4-restore.zip" from this thread http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2029921
Disclaimer:
As always, It is your responsibility to use this. I wouldn't take any blame.
All credits are given to:
- Dhiru
- Vurrut
- XDA_Bam
- loSconosciuto
- Adi_Pat
- UtterChaos
kool will give it a try
Features??
Thanks. But please post details such as governors and IO schedulers, boot @ 1GHz etc.
now we have 3 devs working on kernel 3.0 ))really nicee
:good:
Guys, try it out. If you don't like it, you can reverse to standard CM10A4 anytime.
Thanks for this crackerizer. I Was just recently thinking about the lack of an overclock kernel for Alpha 4 and you came up with this. Great job! :highfive:
Just the type of steriods needed right now
Thanks bro
Flashing it right away
Edit: kernel works properly, no issues yet.
rom is now much smother
Will report battery after 2-3 cycles.
Sent from my GT-I9003 using xda premium
1200MHz - very unstable
When I was on bam kernel (gingerbread), my phone was very stable (OC 1200), no random reboots or something like that.
On this kernel - 5min and 3 reboots and a lot of FCs :/
Edit:
1100MHz = the same problems like on 1200 and 1300
rascal0pl said:
1200MHz - very unstable
When I was on bam kernel (gingerbread), my phone was very stable (OC 1200), no random reboots or something like that.
On this kernel - 5min and 3 reboots and a lot of FCs :/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
For me it's quite the opposite. On Bam Kernel or Vurrut my phone use to lock up as soon as OC applied to 1.35GHZ. Now it stays without any problem.
Ha thanks for the super team of developers. Now the room is smoother than ever(until 3.0)thanks to the overclock and stuff. Plus great there is the signal fix with it.
rascal0pl said:
1200MHz - very unstable
When I was on bam kernel (gingerbread), my phone was very stable (OC 1200), no random reboots or something like that.
On this kernel - 5min and 3 reboots and a lot of FCs :/
Edit:
1100MHz = the same problems like on 1200 and 1300
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Mine running at 1.35Ghz without any problem (the phone is a little hotter than other speed). I do a lot of gaming (most are 3D).
Is your phone stable at stock speed? I think some phones may not be able to overclock.
i want to flash your kernel,but how to back to stock dhiru kernel?
MR.Volkf said:
i want to flash your kernel,but how to back to stock dhiru kernel?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Reboot into recovery.. Go to backup-advance-backup boot.. So do u can restored back the previous kernel..
Sent from my GT-I9003 using Tapatalk 2
Just make a confirmation here, it work on JellyBam V.3.1.0
Here's some screenshots of the kernel.
1.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
2.
3.
4.
5.
@Crackerizer : You can use this screenshot for your Kernel, Keep Developing this kernel
Sent from my Galaxy SL Powered by JellyBam V3.1.0
Rom is definitely smoother and with OC games lag way less....
But got one feedback on the camera. Image preview is very much distorted.Too many flickers.(during video recodring too)
Never had this issue in the stock kernel or loSconosciuto's signal fix kernel.
can you please look into the issue ? and can someone else confirm this ?
mdaamir1989 said:
Rom is definitely smoother and with OC games lag way less....
But got one feedback on the camera. Image preview is very much distorted.Too many flickers.(during video recodring too)
Never had this issue in the stock kernel or loSconosciuto's signal fix kernel.
can you please look into the issue ? and can someone else confirm this ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is a bug for CM10. I think it will be fixed when kernel 3.0 is ready.
Anyway, The recorded video is ok. :good:
crackerizer said:
Mine running at 1.35Ghz without any problem (the phone is a little hotter than other speed). I do a lot of gaming (most are 3D).
Is your phone stable at stock speed? I think some phones may not be able to overclock.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, this kernel is unstable even on 1000MHz
and,
as I said, on gingerbread 1200MHz (BAM kernel) was very stable, without any FCs and reboots, so my phone is able to OC.
rascal0pl said:
No, this kernel is unstable even on 1000MHz
and,
as I said, on gingerbread 1200MHz (BAM kernel) was very stable, without any FCs and reboots.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If its unstable don't use it. U might risk the chances of burning your chip .
OC is stable for me. Works fine.
rascal0pl said:
No, this kernel is unstable even on 1000MHz
and,
as I said, on gingerbread 1200MHz (BAM kernel) was very stable, without any FCs and reboots, so my phone is able to OC.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It depends on the hardware you have, try a different OC or roll back.
Hi,
See below a quick comparison between these 4 setups:
1) ATT ICS 4.0.4 Stock (no tweaks) @ 1000Mhz
2) Mokee RC4 + JBX Kernel v0.7b + RIL_SDRW_TWEAKS @ 1000Mhz
3) Mokee RC4 + JBX Kernel v0.7b + RIL_SDRW_TWEAKS @ 1350Mhz
4) MIUI v5 2013-04-26 591fan.com (no tweaks) @ 1000Mhz
(1) (2) (3) (4)
Antuntu Benchmark = 7014 / 7677 / 8892 / 7167
ram 1047 / 1165 / 1489 / 1154
cpu integer 1333 / 1359 / 1832 / 1333
cpu float 1095 / 1324 / 1791 / 1236
2d 501 / 542 / 565 / 482
3d 2417 / 2575 / 2506 / 2185
io 410 / 555 / 560 / 550
write 131 / 76 / 76 / 150
read 80 / 81 / 73 / 77
Besides the SD Reading/Writing, the combination "Mokee RC4+JBX" is the fastest ROM that I've tested!
What could be the cause of this weak SD R/W score?
By the way, Miui V5 had the best SD R/W score.
Unfortunately, JBX 0.7b still has the rotation issue...
Cheers,
Ricardo Júnior.
what where your settings in trickster settings, for stable 1.350 mhz? voltage?
rivas1981 said:
what where your settings in trickster settings, for stable 1.350 mhz? voltage?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I didn't change anything after install the JBX 0.7b. I didn't even install the trickster app.
The last stable JBX kernel (0.7b) seems to have all the settings already applied to OC up to 1500mhz.
I just changed this configuration "Settings/Performance/Processor/Maximum CPU frequency" to 1350 (the maximum available) and it worked.
For more info about JBX kernel, please read the first topic of this thread that was updated yesterday. (http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2320784)
My score.. Liquidsmooth 1.4ghz live oc 111..
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my MB865 using Tapatalk 4 Beta
hafizkris90 said:
My score.. Liquidsmooth 1.4ghz live oc 111..
Sent from my MB865 using Tapatalk 4 Beta
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
WOW !!
I'll give Liquidsmooth a try this night !!!
Ricardo Jr.
Highest I've seen is 10k..
Sent from my MB865 using Tapatalk 4 Beta
I get about 9650 at 1512MHz on cm with jbx..
Sent from my MB865 using Tapatalk 2
somehow.. i find that running at higher clock speed can conserve battery life.. race to idle stuff is true imo..
rom
I was just looking to flash a new custom Rom.
Thanks for the results, will choose then most probably Mokee
Mokee rc with latest jbx
Sent from my MB865 using xda app-developers app
the highest score i can get about 9457 @ 1410Mhz on Dirty Unicorn with JBX 0.7b
hafizkris90 said:
My score.. Liquidsmooth 1.4ghz live oc 111..
Sent from my MB865 using Tapatalk 4 Beta
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nice i never got mine over 8800
did u trickster mod the gpu also....
darth_nihar said:
Nice i never got mine over 8800
did u trickster mod the gpu also....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nope.. Just the live oc..
hafizkris90 said:
Nope.. Just the live oc..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
AWSM STUFF ............but must be getting ****ty battery life wid tht kinda score
darth_nihar said:
AWSM STUFF ............but must be getting ****ty battery life wid tht kinda score
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not really.. I get nice battery with it..some people say that higher cpu speed make process run faster to idle..so instead of spending let say 2sec of processing with 1ghz..why not 1 sec with 1.5ghz.. The smart flex is on so I dont see any difference in compare to 1.3ghz..
hafizkris90 said:
Not really.. I get nice battery with it..some people say that higher cpu speed make process run faster to idle..so instead of spending let say 2sec of processing with 1ghz..why not 1 sec with 1.5ghz.. The smart flex is on so I dont see any difference in compare to 1.3ghz..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
can you give me the exact rom and configs your using to get that score i wanna try 4 myself :highfive:
That one is liquidsmooth.. Jbx oced to 1.4ghz.. Dont remember which version thou.. XD
What about battery life and stability?
Mokee vs MIUI vs OmniROM vs Pacman vs
skanskan said:
What about battery life and stability?
Mokee vs MIUI vs OmniROM vs Pacman vs
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
For me slim build 7 is best for battery life.
Cm11 latest. Jbx.31 @ 1300mhz/performance gov/15xx read ahead gov @ deadline.
Sent from my nuked G2...
Hello guys ! I have tried many ROMs available for our beloved Fit and each with different performance score
I would like to ask Fit users to benchmark their devices with and the result.
Notice: Please add a screenshot and state the ROM you are using, CPU settings and if any script installed
Thank You for participating.
I seen there are several more threads opened on this topic but as Android has evolved I thought a new fresh one was in order.
So here I go first:
ROM: KITKAT SANDWICH V 1.0 (CM9.2 Based)
CPU: Min: 245 / Max: 729 / Gov: CONSERVATIVE
Script: Fly-On Mod Beta5
Universal Odex Script ( Full odex of rom )
I have installed the new ICS adreno200 libs
Benchmark: Quadrant Standard Edition v2.1.1
Score: 1452
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
ROM - cm-11-20131225-EXPERIMENTAL-beni.zip
Android kitkat
Benchmark score 606.
I'm unable to upload screenshots of yhe result.
Sent from my GT-S5670 using xda app-developers app
My device
ROM: MIUIV4 ICS 3.2.22 Caspian Series
CPU: Min: 122.88
Max: 768.00
Gov: smartassV2
Script: No Script (May install FlyOn Mod)
Score: 615
k3eNaNz said:
Hello guys ! I have tried many ROMs available for our beloved Fit and each with different performance score
I would like to ask Fit users to benchmark their devices with and the result.
Notice: Please add a screenshot and state the ROM you are using, CPU settings and if any script installed
Thank You for participating.
I seen there are several more threads opened on this topic but as Android has evolved I thought a new fresh one was in order.
So here I go first:
ROM: KITKAT SANDWICH V 1.0 (CM9.2 Based)
CPU: Min: 245 / Max: 729 / Gov: CONSERVATIVE
Script: Fly-On Mod Beta5
Universal Odex Script ( Full odex of rom )
I have installed the new ICS adreno200 libs
Benchmark: Quadrant Standard Edition v2.1.1
Score: 1452
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can u give me "the new ICS adreno200 libs" & tell me whether it works for GB & JB??
Thnks!!
Btw... Huge score!!
Galaxy_Rohit said:
Can u give me "the new ICS adreno200 libs" & tell me whether it works for GB & JB??
Thnks!!
Btw... Huge score!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The source from were i downloaded it was different but i found one on our forum. DO BACKUP as this is intended for ICS upgrade for what i have read and yeah as the thread says don`t install them on 2.3 (CM7)
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=23455248
Quad score 1462
Just changed my ROM today,
Awesome fast.
ROM - BeniOdex NewExp-JB SE080813CosmicFit.zip
Smartassv2
Quad score. 1462
Sent from my GT-S5670 using xda app-developers app
MIUI Supportive??
k3eNaNz said:
The source from were i downloaded it was different but i found one on our forum. DO BACKUP as this is intended for ICS upgrade for what i have read and yeah as the thread says don`t install them on 2.3 (CM7)
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=23455248
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Will those work on the MIUI ROM im using???? See my signature if u want to see the details of the ROM..
P.S.- Im a noob.. Please dont get crazy over my no0b questions :silly:
Dhanesh95 said:
Will those work on the MIUI ROM im using???? See my signature if u want to see the details of the ROM..
P.S.- Im a noob.. Please dont get crazy over my no0b questions :silly:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It doesn`t matter what type of ROM is. Just what based is. If it is ICS+ it is suppose to work.
benchmark your current rom, see score. Backup current ROM then install adreno libs and benchmark again and see if there`s any improvement.
Note that this are Graphics libs so see 2D&3D scores.
k3eNaNz said:
It doesn`t matter what type of ROM is. Just what based is. If it is ICS+ it is suppose to work.
benchmark your current rom, see score. Backup current ROM then install adreno libs and benchmark again and see if there`s any improvement.
Note that this are Graphics libs so see 2D&3D scores.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank You!
Im flashing HD V3 now... Will try those libs on MIUI later... :silly: :good:
New ROM Benchmark Score
ROM : Hyper Droid V3
CPU: Min : 245
Max: 800
Governor: ondemand
Script: Fly-On MOD V4.0 RC-1
Score : 1233
this is mine
jelly bread
max procesor 729
no script just s2e
pavel73 said:
this is mine
jelly bread
max procesor 729
no script just s2e
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Holy crap that is good performance for 729. I used that ROM for a long time too but changed it because of some errors. Maybe some day someone will port the last update for us.
I'm on official cm7 & the antutu app is Force Closing. Pls. give me the app which u guys r using...Btw I'm using antutu for the very 1st time.. Pls. help.
Galaxy_Rohit said:
I'm on official cm7 & the antutu app is Force Closing. Pls. give me the app which u guys r using...Btw I'm using antutu for the very 1st time.. Pls. help.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Antutu is no longer suporting Armv6 ( devices like gio,mini,fit etc )
Quadrant Standard still has support for us
Here's mine...without any script...nothing!! Just pure official cm7 with 24-30user apps installed.
via Quadrant Professional(coz it doesn't need internet all the time...& neither do I)
Hey guys post your note 3 sm-n9005/n900 antutu score here,and also include your rom,screenshot,kernal and overclock. Here's my benchmark and settings:
Tesla rom,
Arter97,
2.2 ghz,
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Here it is...
Slimlp latest, nothing tweaked...
Sent from my SM-N9005 using Tapatalk
Model: SM-9006(China Unicom Single-Sim 3G Version)
Rom:CyanogenMod13-temasek-v3.50
Battery mode: performance
Antutu Version:6.0
Score is below:
Total:44615
3D:4612
UX:18844
CPU:16988
RAM:4171
Don't konw how to post an image,I'm using Xda Premuim Android App.
47k on stock lollipop uk
mstevan said:
View attachment 3653688
Here it is...
Slimlp latest, nothing tweaked...
Sent from my SM-N9005 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
how to you reach 52k without tweaks?i can only reach 52k with oc and custom rom
Antutu 6.0
Score : 43967
Note 3 Exynos N900
Aurora Rom port 5 by Sksarfaraz
Suemax Kernel by DJMAX81
Overclock settings :
CPU : unchanged (1900mhz)
GPU : 733mhz
?
*cant post ss yet, sorry
Yong Ui Lee said:
how to you reach 52k without tweaks?i can only reach 52k with oc and custom rom
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Slim lp with included kernel. Just downloaded antutu and run it.
And, yes, if this is consider as tweaking, i put under performance settings to "performance" from "balanced" mode... If that is tweaking, then it is tweaked
Sent from my SM-N9005 using Tapatalk
mstevan said:
Slim lp with included kernel. Just downloaded antutu and run it.
And, yes, if this is consider as tweaking, i put under performance settings to "performance" from "balanced" mode... If that is tweaking, then it is tweaked
Sent from my SM-N9005 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
lol ofc thats a tweak.It puts your phone cpu to maximum frequency.:laugh:I personally like slim roms for their stability and customization,and highly recommend it
pitopika13 said:
Antutu 6.0
Score : 43967
Note 3 Exynos N900
Aurora Rom port 5 by Sksarfaraz
Suemax Kernel by DJMAX81
Overclock settings :
CPU : unchanged (1900mhz)
GPU : 733mhz
*cant post ss yet, sorry
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Does your phone get very hot?your gpu is at a very high frequency,and hows the stability?
sutty86 said:
47k on stock lollipop uk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thats pretty high for stock :good::good::good:
Audax v34 stock based
Arter97 kernel 9.1 n9005
AVFA said:
Audax v34 stock based
Arter97 kernel 9.1 n9005
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
that is amazing,did you do any overclocking?
Yong Ui Lee said:
that is amazing,did you do any overclocking?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No. Only default settings. I think this is not normal score only this kernel's 9.0 version give this score. New version gives 45k. I dont know why
Yong Ui Lee said:
Does your phone get very hot?your gpu is at a very high frequency,and hows the stability?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It does get hot when playing a game (but not very hot though), and I didn't experience any stability issues yet with my settings, but if I set the CPU freq to 2000mhz, i get a random restart (mostly occur when i open browser apps:silly.
137,059 lg g5 stock
Brainfart
jkbone7111 said:
137,059 lg g5 stock
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you would have bothered to have read the topic title, you would have known that this is a thread for owners of Samsung Galaxy Note 3's. Either that or you're a troll; in that case, 1/10.
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 SM-N900 Exynos - Unofficial SlimLP ROM Beta
View attachment 3717606
As per title, SM-N900 Exynos with the Unofficial SlimLP ROM available in the Exynos Developer Section. While I like this ROM, I am having a problem with notifications and it appears as though development has slowed/stopped for this particular release, and for SlimLP in general. Looking forward to trying Safarend's updated CM12 and/or CM13 builds.
FYI the processor in this phone is the Exynos 5 Octa 5420 (big.LITTLE configuration with 4 ARM Cortex A15's at 1.9 Ghz and 4 ARM Cortex A7's at 1.3 Ghz), the Mali-T628 MP6 at 480 Mhz, and 3GB of LPDDR3e RAM. It's a hell of a lot of machine, and although the 5420 supports HMP yet leaves it unabled, it runs pretty quickly for an older phone, as the benchmark shows. I'm hoping that there is renewed interest in keeping these phones going for international markets, as it would be a cinch to snag a bunch of them, install modded firmware and resell them...
Thanks for reading, go XDA!
Are you butt hurt? Stop crying over silly mistakes. A polite reminder woulda been cool. Not a nooob here just don't say much. Watch and learn more . note 3 was 8 years back. Good school project.
Sent from my VS987 using XDA-Developers mobile app
jkbone7111 said:
137,059 lg g5 stock
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hmm thats high, off topic, still cant beat the Apple A9X @ 184,800 though
i Got 55k of score
Rom : AAL ROM V2 ( PRIVATE)
Note 3 N900 EXYNOS