Related
1) SetCPU profile to 1000Mhz = temp > 43C
2) Tegrak overclock
a) load module
b) load 1100Mhz
c) Save profile in SetCPU
(REPEAT PROCESS With 1200Mhz, 1300Mhz)
Please use Set CPU and make sure to add profiles.
800 Mhz = temp > 45C (audible alarm)
1000 Mhz = temp > 43C
1100 Mhz = temp > 40C
1200 Mhz = temp > 35C
1300 Mhz = temp > 30C
My FLOPS in the stress test went from 12 to 16
Now I am able to watch Jimmy Fallon Live and probably Jersey Shore
Those Adobe Flash videos were too heavy for my 1000 Mhz processor
with 1200 Mhz, I'm happy to say the video runs nice.
a few FPS drops here and there, but hey, it's 100 watchable now
rafarataneneces said:
I've read that a program called tegrak overclock can allow you to overclock, but from what I know unless you have an overclocked kernel, you can't overclock
I would like to know if there is a future with this phone.
Currently there are only 2 ROMs working (one of them, the author closed the thread)
I've spent at least one month fixing all the issues of this phone, and by the looks of it it's not quite popular here in USA
I will appreciate responses, since I know that overclocking can give a HUGE boost of speed.
I am thinking in returning my phone and hopefully getting the LG 2GX (Optimus 2X)
Has anybody overclocked their Samsung Galaxy S 4G?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
In the defence of the person who built the ROM your talking about, he did not close the thread... a moderator did.
overclocking is currently not an option for this device and only time will tell if it will be.
as for ROMs, Krylon360 of Team Whiskey will be developing more ROMs soon as he is waiting on getting a device to work with.
the LG looks to be a good device... has many features that are better than the sgs4g so i would think its a decent switch. but for me im waiting for july... the HTC and sgsII will be be out by that time and I can choose the cream of the crop.
mavictb said:
In the defence of the person who built the ROM your talking about, he did not close the thread... a moderator did.
overclocking is currently not an option for this device and only time will tell if it will be.
as for ROMs, Krylon360 of Team Whiskey will be developing more ROMs soon as he is waiting on getting a device to work with.
the LG looks to be a good device... has many features that are better than the sgs4g so i would think its a decent switch. but for me im waiting for july... the HTC and sgsII will be be out by that time and I can choose the cream of the crop.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Any idea when it will be released?
And what price it will have?
If the phone costs around $600, I would buy it
Anything over it I'd guess it's overpriced.
the one thing that I DO NOT LIKE about the Galaxy S 4G is the lack of Flash for the camera
I'd say for a $500 device adding a $10 flash somewhere in the phone would be a good idea
worked great..quadrant score went up also..seems alot faster..thanks alot! this shouldnt do no harm to the phone right? im new to this kind of stuff so kinda nervous.
zmaroman said:
worked great..quadrant score went up also..seems alot faster..thanks alot! this shouldnt do no harm to the phone right? im new to this kind of stuff so kinda nervous.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What kind of scores?
Let us know how this works for you.
If your phone starts getting hot pull the battery.
Sent from my SGH-T959V using XDA Premium App
phone went from 966 to 1212 on the quadrant score with a stock rom.
Works great getting scores around 12300 on quadrent using shadowman's v2.2
Sent from my SGH-T959V using XDA Premium App
i just flashed mine to v2.2 and did the quardrant score and it went down .. did i do something wrong? did u delete the bloatware? running anything else?
As long as u watch out for the temperatures you should be fine
Even if I break the unit I still have warranty on this
Plus I'll be returning this phone anyway
I'll test Quadrant right now
SethNkC said:
Works great getting scores around 12300 on quadrent using shadowman's v2.2
Sent from my SGH-T959V using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I get 1224 on Quadrant
I assume u got 1230
Sorry, I get around 1230.. To many 0's
Sent from my SGH-T959V using XDA Premium App
rafarataneneces said:
1) SetCPU profile to 1000Mhz = temp > 43C
2) Tegrak overclock
a) load module
b) load 1100Mhz
c) Save profile in SetCPU
(REPEAT PROCESS With 1200Mhz, 1300Mhz)
Please use Set CPU and make sure to add profiles.
800 Mhz = temp > 45C (audible alarm)
1000 Mhz = temp > 43C
1100 Mhz = temp > 40C
1200 Mhz = temp > 35C
1300 Mhz = temp > 30C
My FLOPS in the stress test went from 12 to 16
Now I am able to watch Jimmy Fallon Live and probably Jersey Shore
Those Adobe Flash videos were too heavy for my 1000 Mhz processor
with 1200 Mhz, I'm happy to say the video runs nice.
a few FPS drops here and there, but hey, it's 100 watchable now
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
When setting Profiles,
Do you have all of them default to "Charging"?
For scaling do you have them default to "Conservative"?
Do you leave all the Min at default 100000?
Do you leave all the priorities set at default 50?
This wont work due to there is no kernel that allows OC yet for the SGS4G. Ill work on building one after i get CWM and Black Ice going for the device.
Sent from my SGH-T959V using XDA App
krylon360 said:
This wont work due to there is no kernel that allows OC yet for the SGS4G. Ill work on building one after i get CWM and Black Ice going for the device
Will black ice be running on ext4?
Sent from my SGH-T959V using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sent from my SGH-T959V using XDA Premium App
krylon360 said:
This wont work due to there is no kernel that allows OC yet for the SGS4G. Ill work on building one after i get CWM and Black Ice going for the device.
Sent from my SGH-T959V using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It seems to work and it's also listed as supported on the list of devices in the market. I've only used Quadrant standard so far and was getting higher benchmarks.
On another note. Can't wait to get my TW fix when you get Black Ice working on our phones.
Can you upload the presets so I can just load it please ans thanks
Sent from my SGH-T959V using XDA Premium App
A few comments.
1) Some SG4G's don't like 1.3 gig. I'm finding that at 1.2 gig at a high and 200 meg at the low, it's the most stable...at least for my particular unit. Your mileage may vary.
2) I'm using the "Temp >" profiles for all the settings.
3) I suspect that the reason for why it's wonky for some and works great for others is due to the fact that there isn't a true overclock kernel for it. We're taking potluck as to whether it works or not.
-Steve
I would take a word of advice from Krylon. The Kernel that is on our phones is not set up for this to work correctly. The app may support our phone but, our kernel doesn't yet.
I wouldn't recommend doing this. Wait for a compatible Kernel. It will happen but when your phone gets hotter than it was meant to, things on the mother board get loose and you have a very expensive paper weight.
Secondly, quad scores aren't that accurate. Meaning a single piece of code can tell the quadrant app to read higher than its actually running. The phone may run a little faster but its not what it will be with VooDoo lagfix.
This phone should get a true quad score in the mid 900's stock. With the right kernel, and voodoo lag fix (ext4) this phone should get around 1750-1850. That is without overclocking at all. it will have better battery and you won't overheat your phone .
Bl4ckpheniX said:
(snip)
Secondly, quad scores aren't that accurate. Meaning a single piece of code can tell the quadrant app to read higher than its actually running. The phone may run a little faster but its not what it will be with VooDoo lagfix.
This phone should get a true quad score in the mid 900's stock. With the right kernel, and voodoo lag fix (ext4) this phone should get around 1750-1850. That is without overclocking at all. it will have better battery and you won't overheat your phone .
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I thought that Voodoo lagfix wasn't applicable in the SG4G because of the fact that the SG4G doesn't use an abnormal file structure. Or am I wrong?
sgyee said:
I thought that Voodoo lagfix wasn't applicable in the SG4G because of the fact that the SG4G doesn't use an abnormal file structure. Or am I wrong?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think the only real speed difference is with the browser. My vibrant / and sgs 4g get similar quad scores when the vibrant has voodoo disabled.
Sent from my SGH-T959V using XDA Premium App
It was suggested to me that in order to prevent excessive battery drain and heat when using CM7 I should disable one of the cores. Has anyone done this? What negative impacts could doing this cause (if any)?
webmaster said:
It was suggested to me that in order to prevent excessive battery drain and heat when using CM7 I should disable one of the cores. Has anyone done this? What negative impacts could doing this cause (if any)?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If anything it would increase battery drain due to all the processing being put on one single core, what I would recommend for a decrease in battery drain is different kernels with under volting options. That's what's worked best for me.
Sent from my Sensation using xda premium
Chilled26 said:
If anything it would increase battery drain due to all the processing being put on one single core, what I would recommend for a decrease in battery drain is different kernels with under volting options. That's what's worked best for me.
Sent from my Sensation using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It was my perception that the older single core phones had better battery life. Do you really think it would hurt the battery?
Dual core isn't properly utilized yet so it might not be a bad idea.
Here is an example of my battery drain for today with the bricked kernel v1.4.
Sent from my Sensation using xda premium
Changing kernel and undervolting did the trick for me. Getting 20 hours moderate use.
Sent from my Sensation using xda premium
Chilled26 said:
Here is an example of my battery drain for today with the bricked kernel v1.4.
Sent from my Sensation using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What are your settings?
Most of the time when both cores are on the 2nd isn't doing anything, because the first core isn't even pushed enough to reach max. So, I feel 1 core is sufficient, I'm running 4.1.x w/ 1 core @800 and the battery and speed are fine. Although I see others running speeds of 1.2 and higher, but I barely notice the difference of the freqs. The S3 is so fast that the higher clocks are overkill IMO.
Ace42 said:
Most of the time when both cores are on the 2nd isn't doing anything, because the first core isn't even pushed enough to reach max. So, I feel 1 core is sufficient, I'm running 4.1.x w/ 1 core @800 and the battery and speed are fine. Although I see others running speeds of 1.2 and higher, but I barely notice the difference of the freqs. The S3 is so fast that the higher clocks are overkill IMO.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I suspect you see a noticeable difference in battery life then? Also, what method did you use to disable the second core?
webmaster said:
What are your settings?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Honestly I don't even touch the settings I just run at default.
Sent from my Sensation using xda premium
Pretty snappy
su
chmod 644 /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/online
echo "0" > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/online
chmod 444 /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/online
Someone in faux kernel forum was talking about doing this. Gscript app makes it easy to run script. If you dont like it just reboot and 2nd core is back on.
Sent from my Sensation using XDA Premium App
Chilled26 said:
Honestly I don't even touch the settings I just run at default.
Sent from my Sensation using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I tried Faux's and it was ok, I plan on trying Bricked tomorrow. However if disabling a core gives even better results then that might be the way to go.
webmaster said:
I suspect you see a noticeable difference in battery life then? Also, what method did you use to disable the second core?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
echo 0 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/online
I do see a difference in battery life, which is why I prefer this setup, when we have ICS I will use both cores. But I feel cheated on Ginger so I use 1 for now, and whoever said two cores has better batt is wrong...Logically two cores use twice the voltage, that means 1 cores will save a significant amount of power. A weak dual core w/ 1 core on will have bad life, but a fast on is different.
Ace42 said:
echo 0 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/online
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Is that permanent or does it need to be run each time you reboot?
webmaster said:
Is that permanent or does it need to be run each time you reboot?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Every boot, you can make a linux script(.sh) if you want, and then use script manager. But, I'm only testing this for comparison, I can't see the speed difference w/ 1 or 2 so I just use 1. 1 @800 core feels how fast my MT4G did when OC'd @1.4Ghz.
Ace42 said:
Every boot, you can make a linux script(.sh) if you want, and then use script manager. But, I'm only testing this for comparison, I can't see the speed difference w/ 1 or 2 so I just use 1. 1 @800 core feels how fast my MT4G did when OC'd @1.4Ghz.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How long have you been running like that?
I run Faux kernel, Joe's RCU, undervolted -50mV and underclocked to 1Ghz, I can now easily make it through the day and I'm a moderate to heavy user. I'm pretty sure disabling the second core isn't necessary, and frankly, if you check out how little it's used, it probably wouldn't benefit that much anyhow.
Ace42 said:
echo 0 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/online
I do see a difference in battery life, which is why I prefer this setup, when we have ICS I will use both cores. But I feel cheated on Ginger so I use 1 for now, and whoever said two cores has better batt is wrong...Logically two cores use twice the voltage, that means 1 cores will save a significant amount of power. A weak dual core w/ 1 core on will have bad life, but a fast on is different.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Completely false. Just because something has voltage across it doesnt mean that it is doing anything. Voltage times current equal power. Using power uses the battery.
You guys need to SERIOUSLY change the way you make decisions. Just because something SEEMS logical to you, doesnt mean it is correct. I see alot of BAD info being pushed around here.
I have CM7 and run Fauxs kernels. I FORCE both CPUs online and run at 1.56Ghz. My standby is around 30mAH...Nuff said.
Something else is messed up. Chase facts, not fiction people.
Another issue? UVing. You guys break so many rules in electrical engineering that it isnt even funny. Ive explained things so many times that I am sick of it. I wont anymore, but will let you know that you have missed some key facts.
Matt
mrg02d said:
Completely false. Just because something has voltage across it doesnt mean that it is doing anything. Voltage times current equal power. Using power uses the battery.
You guys need to SERIOUSLY change the way you make decisions. Just because something SEEMS logical to you, doesnt mean it is correct. I see alot of BAD info being pushed around here.
I have CM7 and run Fauxs kernels. I FORCE both CPUs online and run at 1.56Ghz. My standby is around 30mAH...Nuff said.
Something else is messed up. Chase facts, not fiction people.
Another issue? UVing. You guys break so many rules in electrical engineering that it isnt even funny. Ive explained things so many times that I am sick of it. I wont anymore, but will let you know that you have missed some key facts.
Matt
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So me having better life w/ 1 core is false? Even though I've compared it w/ 2? And I don't know what your problem is but keep it to yourself, I didn't force you to respond to my post, only sharing my experiences.
webmaster said:
How long have you been running like that?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Almost 1 day, battery around 30 still. But I listened to music, internet, sync and played some games so my life was shorten.
Ace42 said:
So me having better life w/ 1 core is false? Even though I've compared it w/ 2? And I don't know what your problem is but keep it to yourself, I didn't force you to respond to my post, only sharing my experiences.
Almost 1 day, battery around 30 still. But I listened to music, internet, sync and played some games so my life was shorten.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I didnt say this. It is obvious what I said, so why would you even ask me? Just scroll up pal.
You didnt simply give an experience...You implied that your experience is LOGICAL. It may to you, but it is incorrect. Dont just throw things out there, please. It makes people with backgrounds in power and energy pissed off.
Also, my finding completely debuncts your theory. At night, while I sleep, I see 5mAH draw.
Matt
Hi,
having registered here some time ago i've been reading many threads about custom ROMs and the kernels used. Many of them seem to support overclocking your phones CPU. The thing i'm wondering about is that there's kernels which actually overclock your CPU to double the speed its CPU is supposed to be running on (!!), giving the CPU some more voltage i believe.
Actually i'm a bit sceptical about how setting the CPU to such sick frequencies has a bad effect on the CPU's lifetime. The way i understood the problem with clocking the CPU high is always the heat development, meaning without proper cooling the CPU will simply "melt away" (at least that's how it is on desktop computers). Of course, CPU's on smartphones are not cooled or anything. Now that there seem to be many people here, developpers or not, who got deeper into the hardware, probably already opened up a phone, or have some experience with the long term consequences of overclocking.
So my final question is: What is safe and what is not? I saw for the Galaxy 3 for example exist different kernels, some non-overlock kernels, as some kernels only doing limited overclocking up to 800 MHz (which seems to be the most healthy option to me), but also some kernels overclocking up to 1300 MHz, which as i said seems kinda sick to me. Well i bet there's someone out there with a bit more experience than me regarding this so i'd be thankful for any answer.
I believe its safe as long as you dont keep the phone at high overclocked spds all the time. Besides, this chips are designed to last 5 years at least so if you overclock and shorten its life, you would have already changed your phone. In short, dont worry, just dont leave your phone at above 1000mhz all the time
Sent from my GT-I9003 using xda premium
bscraze said:
Besides, this chips are designed to last 5 years at least so if you overclock and shorten its life, you would have already changed your phone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You got a point there hehe. Technical progress is moving in light speed. Anyway, i want to make my phone last as long as possible of course. But it's true, with CPU stepping it won't run on the highest frequency the whole time, even if overclocked, so i guess that overheating won't be an issue.
The only time i overclock is when im playing 3d games. Other times mine is 700mhz at most
Sent from my GT-I9003 using xda premium
hi bscraze..,& others...
pls share ur setcpu setings...i've started a thread in Q&A...so that we can get an idea...
i'm always using 1200mhz...is it safe...??
LooksLikeSmart said:
hi bscraze..,& others...
pls share ur setcpu setings...i've started a thread in Q&A...so that we can get an idea...
i'm always using 1200mhz...is it safe...??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No.. 800mhz should be your main profile. When charging i put 1200mhz 300mhz on demand. You shouldnt always leave it at 1200mhz. Only when you need it
Sent from my GT-I9003 using xda premium
LooksLikeSmart said:
hi bscraze..,& others...
pls share ur setcpu setings...i've started a thread in Q&A...so that we can get an idea...
i'm always using 1200mhz...is it safe...??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
if you use a governor like OnDemand/Conservative, your phone wont always be on 1200 but usually on the lower values...It will go only to 1200 when needed
Does anyone know the ideal settings for undervolting the sensation without causing any problems?
StuartTheFish said:
Does anyone know the ideal settings for undervolting the sensation without causing any problems?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not really. As faux say not all chips are created equal. I've seen up to an amazing -150 but my phone can only handle -50 stable and -75 sometimes with a reboot or two.
Sent from my HTC Sensation 4g using xda premium
Mine handles -100 just fine, but yeah,others can only go -50. Just use system tuner and hit the -12.5 till your phone freezes, then when it restarts go one less and see if it's stable. That's what I did.
Sent from my HTC Sensation 4G using XDA App
I'd also suggest keeping the Max Clock at a consistent value while you play. E.g. UV -100mV might work well at one Mhz then fail at a higher value.
Mine seemed to work consistently at about -100mV, then again I tend to UC unless I'm running CF-Bench or something
Should I only need to concentrate on the lowest and highest clock speeds it's been set to use? Or will I have to undervolt all other frequencies between the two? Not sure if it increments on usage, or simply toggles between the min and max.
If it does increment, how can I test it's stability on the other frequencies if I can't tell what frequency it was using at the time?
Just tapped the -12.5 button a few times, and it reduced all of the sliders. It's -100 now with no apparent issues as of yet.
May I ask the reason for undervolting?
masonic1032 said:
May I ask the reason for undervolting?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Mainly to save battery. Altho I have found that it is quite negligible. It may also help with phone heat
masondoctorjt said:
Mine handles -100 just fine, but yeah,others can only go -50. Just use system tuner and hit the -12.5 till your phone freezes, then when it restarts go one less and see if it's stable. That's what I did.
Sent from my HTC Sensation 4G using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I run faux latest version 2.7 beta and I see his scripts to undervolt and the lowest I see it too go is -75 how are you able to go lower to -100.... ???
I think it varies from phone to phone, mine too seems happy enough -100.
StuartTheFish said:
I think it varies from phone to phone, mine too seems happy enough -100.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Soooooo how do I undervolt below -75 that's where I am. Now
rawdawgroy said:
Soooooo how do I undervolt below -75 that's where I am. Now
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If the phone hangs/boots below that level then with the Phone/Kernel/... that's the limit.
I created a GScript script (well a sh script) to U/V after a reboot. I didn't want it to do it automatically as you'd end up in a boot loop. Just hassle to fix. The reason for the GScript was to remove it from the various CPU controllers I'd tried, I ended up just using the CM7 one to control the CPU.
Faux has the command to do it globally (across all frequencies) or individual frequencies. TBH I never bothered with individual ones.
The bottom line is, do what you and your phone are happy with.
EDIT: meant to add you can check the actual value manually. I know the Faux one (same post as the scripts above) but if you are using a different kernel it might be in a different place.
Hello, my main purpose is to save battery. I want let the CPU act normally (stock) while the screen is ON, and i want to undervolt/underclock the CPU, while the screen is OFF and when i am on a phone call. I do not care about overclocking.
Is there any CPU tuner (or even SetCPU app) guide for nexus 5?
I really want to know the correct frequences to setup in order to avoid problems
I use stock ROM and stock kernel.
Thank you in advance.:good:
There are no correct frequencies. Just play and find what's good. Remember though, the more you underclock, the longer it takes to undertake certain tasks so it can be a false economy.
My advice would be undervolt always and under clock never.
You cannot undervolt stock kernel
Read section 4.3 in my signature
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
rootSU said:
There are no correct frequencies. Just play and find what's good. Remember though, the more you underclock, the longer it takes to undertake certain tasks so it can be a false economy.
My advice would be undervolt always and under clock never.
You cannot undervolt stock kernel
Read section 4.3 in my signature
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you for answering and thank you for the information! I have 1 question in order to clear some things out. What causes battery economy Underclock or undervolt?
Dmoustakas said:
Thank you for answering and thank you for the information! I have 1 question in order to clear some things out. What causes battery economy Underclock or undervolt?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Both have potential but really the best thing is deep sleep.
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
rootSU said:
Both have potential but really the best thing is deep sleep.
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I already use greenify so i think it is the same thing with deep sleep. One last question, could underclock be false economy in my situations since i want it to work only when screen is off and only on active phone calls?
Dmoustakas said:
I already use greenify so i think it is the same thing with deep sleep. One last question, could underclock be false economy in my situations since i want it to work only when screen is off and only on active phone calls?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Screen off does not = deep sleep. In my opinion, it's best to let it do what it wants, however my kernel sets maxscreen off at 1100 MHz
Its all about clock cycles. The Stock kernel allows the CPU to run at approximately 23,000 MHz. Each MHz is a "Clock cycle" per second. So each second, you have 23,000 clock cycles. Now lets say (this is not a real value, but just humour me) that an e-mail Push takes 23,000 clock cycles. You can receive an email in 1 second. With me so far? So what if you underclock to 12,500MHz? It takes twice as long to push that same email to your phone. So now you have to work out, is 12,500MHz using more or less than half the power that 23,000MHz uses? If it is less than half, you *MAY* save some battery, but if it uses more than half, its a false economy because 2 seconds at 12,500 uses more power than 1 second at 23,000.
Does that make sense?
I've kept this basic for illustration purposes, so anyone reading, please don't make technical corrections, this is not meant to be exact or accurate
rootSU said:
Screen off does not = deep sleep. In my opinion, it's best to let it do what it wants, however my kernel sets maxscreen off at 1100 MHz
Its all about clock cycles. The Stock kernel allows the CPU to run at approximately 23,000 MHz. Each MHz is a "Clock cycle" per second. So each second, you have 23,000 clock cycles. Now lets say (this is not a real value, but just humour me) that an e-mail Push takes 23,000 clock cycles. You can receive an email in 1 second. With me so far? So what if you underclock to 12,500MHz? It takes twice as long to push that same email to your phone. So now you have to work out, is 12,500MHz using more or less than half the power that 23,000MHz uses? If it is less than half, you *MAY* save some battery, but if it uses more than half, its a false economy because 2 seconds at 12,500 uses more power than 1 second at 23,000.
Does that make sense?
I've kept this basic for illustration purposes, so anyone reading, please don't make technical corrections, this is not meant to be exact or accurate
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Great explanation, clearly logical thoughts. You really covered all my questions. Thank you very much! I think i am going to search for a kernel to tinker with undervolting!
Cheers and thanks again!
Dmoustakas said:
Great explanation, clearly logical thoughts. You really covered all my questions. Thank you very much! I think i am going to search for a kernel to tinker with undervolting!
Cheers and thanks again!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No probs. Take a nandroid backup before tinkering
Cpu tuner do not turn Data off
Hi all
I re install Cpu Tuner on my Nexus 5 with Cataclysm 5.1
kernel elementalX
but Cpu tuner has the same behavior when a was root but stock Lollipop 5.1
It work but do not turn off or on the Data
profiles works, Wifi, Synchronisation Ok but not for Data
I'll try on 3G or 4G... I re install it same behavior :L
thanks.
PS: I used it with my Galaxy Nexus with no probleme... and I use a new conf for the Nexus5.