why am i getting different antutu benchmark results when every make a test?(although i did not do any changes)
re benchmark
suarez1907 said:
why am i getting different antutu benchmark results when every make a test?(although i did not do any changes)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, it tests your CURRENT performance, so, if you have some apps running you are slowing down the process of the benchmark itself =)
Thanks
GT-S5670 cihazımdan Tapatalk 2 ile gönderildi
[QUOTE="suarez1907, post: 34755190, member: 4774016"]why am i getting different antutu benchmark results when e
antutu benchmark and other benchmark apps like that show relative figures of the working capacity of your device....
you can change performance of your device by a number of ways; tweaking,,changing read/write speed,,installing patches,,,etc.
the figures can change every single time you run benchmark test or you can get steady figures/numbers/rankings......
if you are a DEV of some kind then it will be helpful to test different modifications you hv made... otherwise for mango people like us it doesnt matter much.....
for your curiosity you can run/test a number of times.....if your device is functioning somewhat differently then it can be easily observed by the user(i.e. you) .....Hope u understand :angel:
Related
What is the best "Benchmark" testing app out there? I see people testing their Quadrant scores after the lag fix, and I was wondering what app they are using to test it?
Thanks in advance.
Gr8Danes said:
What is the best "Benchmark" testing app out there? I see people testing their Quadrant scores after the lag fix, and I was wondering what app they are using to test it?
Thanks in advance.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Quadrant
Linpack is another benchmarking application.
Quadrant is the one you see most people use. Linpack test mflops, Neo Core test FPS (frames per second). Those are just a few people use, I have them on mine to compare between what I do and my wifes.
Quadrant is useless. As proven in all the speed hacks, its not a good indicator.
From cyanogen today:
http://twitter.com/cyanogen/status/21313672502
http://twitter.com/cyanogen/status/21313718922
Please, this has nothing to do with "ANDROID DEVELOPMENT."
People need to stop making stupid topics like this in the wrong area.
lol quadrant scores the app is called Quadrant Standard i think
I was running scores of over 2k each run.. running perfect storm 1.3v and bamf 4.3b kernel. I updated to 4.42. Delete the cache in setup CPU.. and auto set it to abt 1400+ now my phone is constantly running in he 1700 quadrant... Someone please help..
edit* sometimes when i run quadrant the cpu section won't even calculate and jumps directly to the second test... omg
Sent from my ADR6400L using XDA App
MisterDonut said:
I was running scores of over 2k each run.. running perfect storm 1.3v and bamf 4.3b kernel. I updated to 4.42. Delete the cache in setup CPU.. and auto set it to abt 1400+ now my phone is constantly running in he 1700 quadrant... Someone please help..
edit* sometimes when i run quadrant the cpu section won't even calculate and jumps directly to the second test... omg
Sent from my ADR6400L using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why are you so concerned with what Quadrant says? Your last paragraph sounds as though you spend hours running Quadrant over and over lol. Just enjoy the phone!
this is my first android, so i'm seeing how every rom and every kernel can effect the the speed.. but now i'm running sub scores, and i feel like maybe this kernel isn't as good.. i tried flashing back to 4.3b.. but no luck, i feel like there is something wrong with the phone
When you are flashing are you doing a factory wipe, cache wipe and dalvik wipe. That may help. As for the 1700 that is what I am getting on a cleaned stock rooted rom. My phone is fast. Once you get into overclocking I feel it effects the life on the phone, but that is just my opinion.
Chalup said:
Why are you so concerned with what Quadrant says? Your last paragraph sounds as though you spend hours running Quadrant over and over lol. Just enjoy the phone!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thus has gotten misinterpreted on the web. Quadrant scores are meaningless between devices. One phone could get low scores but be optimized to run smooth and fast. While some other device could get high scores but be optimized poorly and run bad.
HOWEVER, scores do have meaning compared within the same phone model. A thunderbolt vs thunderbolt has meaning. It foes show the performance of how well the phone can do tasks like dcriol a list, crunch thru some JavaScript or HTML, or load a game.
I see everyone say benchmark test scores are meaningless, and that original statement meant "meaningless between different models", but not comparing within the same model.
A nexus one on gingerbread only gets 1000 on quadrant, and its slower and choppy scrolling lists. But the nexus one on froyo gets 1650 easily, and froyo was way smoother scrolling lists etc. The lower score shows its reduced performance ability to do various tasks, and it shows in actual use.
RogerPodacter said:
Thus has gotten misinterpreted on the web. Quadrant scores are meaningless between devices. One phone could get low scores but be optimized to run smooth and fast. While some other device could get high scores but be optimized poorly and run bad.
HOWEVER, scores do have meaning compared within the same phone model. A thunderbolt vs thunderbolt has meaning. It foes show the performance of how well the phone can do tasks like dcriol a list, crunch thru some JavaScript or HTML, or load a game.
I see everyone say benchmark test scores are meaningless, and that original statement meant "meaningless between different models", but not comparing within the same model.
A nexus one on gingerbread only gets 1000 on quadrant, and its slower and choppy scrolling lists. But the nexus one on froyo gets 1650 easily, and froyo was way smoother scrolling lists etc. The lower score shows its reduced performance ability to do various tasks, and it shows in actual use.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
very true but some kernels have various tweaks that can inflate quadrant scores...also on the droid x you could blow up quadrant by disabling stage fright. these phones are so fast it's hard to tell the difference. i've tested just about every kernel and overclocked all the way to 2.06 and the phone goes from really fast... to really really fast... to overheating and unstable lol
i use linpack and cpu benchmark to compare kernels and overclock/governor settings...pretty much gave up on quadrant
Quadrant means nothing... If you can run this piss out of your phone and not make it stall... Its fast enough.
Sent from my ADR6400L using XDA Premium App
I wipe cache and devlic
Sent from my ADR6400L using XDA App
MisterDonut said:
I wipe cache and devlic
Sent from my ADR6400L using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That should be good. I agree that something about that kernel might be suspect.
If you're bored, try the kernel that I'm running. Option to overclock to 1.4 or 1.9 depending on which you select, Good battery life, and stable. 1.4 gets 23XX on quad and the 1.9 gets people 2700-3000. No cheating too.
I tested 3 times just to check if there could be an error but it isn't , my antutu scores show i9003 (XXKB3 fw) to be higher than i9000.
Feels good but wondering how is it possible since all I have been reading that i9000 has better hardware than i9003.
In the bar chart it shows as My device:2083, what does that mean?
It will be higher, because you have applied lag fix which increases the database score dramatically. Hence . You would get a normal database i/o score of around 100.
Hmm great I wil also try
Antutu score without lag fix will be 2000 and above in sgs sl. We have already published our scores in rex.s thread. Lag fix improves only quadrant score by twice. Yes, our scores are higher than sgs.
Sent from my GT-I9003 using XDA App
But it has been already said that lagfix can only improve the antutu benchmark score and nothing else? Is that so?
@sgsl
Did u tried uninstalling lagfix? I think many are having trouble in uninstalling it.
Hmm for undo the lagfix the hard reset or factory reset will be the option and I have also tried to undo it but it says playlogos.bin is not found so to undo ther lagfix I have to hard reset my phone
Did u tried uninstalling lagfix? I think many are having trouble in uninstalling it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No i didn't try removing it, but read here on xda forum about the playlogos.bin, in one of those thread someone discussed a root application which could restore the playlogos.bin & then you can remove the lagfix.
I cant find that thread as of now but do remember that the app was some kind of root tool or root file manager.
Otherwise the only method left is hard reset or factory reset.
No dude, it does not improve antutu score. My personal experience is lagfix only improves quadrant scores. Further These scores have no relationship with improvement of user interface and fluid experience. So no point in using lag fix.
@sgs not sure if factory reset can remove lag fix. The only way may be to reflash.
Sent from my GT-I9003 using XDA App
Just to reverify, I ran antutu, now, my score is 1955. slightly low compared to yours. The difference is in I/O SCORE, which is slightly higher sure to lagfix. But for quadrant score doubles after applyong lag fix.
Sent from my GT-I9003 using XDA App
This means nothing, as does quadrant scores..
Can you also post the screenshots of benchmark figures (2nd screenshot) as it will tell why the difference exist.
Tried from xda app. But failed, I do not have access to pc now will upload in the evening.
Sent from my GT-I9003 using XDA App
My Score
my score on antutu is 2092
You have applied lag fix, my I/O is 85 without lag fix.
Sent from my GT-I9003 using XDA App
what does I/O mean?
sgsI9003 said:
what does I/O mean?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Input and output operations per second. It means how much data can be fetched from a database and stored to it in one second of operation
is it normal?
my antutu score is 2531 without applying any lagfix or any graphics improvement patch!
its just a new phone with not much tweaks!
3D graphics score was 794!
build: froyo DDKF1
Antutu or Quadrant dont really mean anything? And, 2531 is totally normal..Don't worry
okk
well i thought the same..did the test just for fun..
as far as gaming(gpu) of sl is concerned..i think its pretty decent! not that bad as much people say about it
max_rockzz said:
okk
well i thought the same..did the test just for fun..
as far as gaming(gpu) of sl is concerned..i think its pretty decent! not that bad as much people say about it
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think, you would switch to a GB ROM. It gives you better scores and is pretty fast!
i used to get around 32k in antutu and around 18k in quadrant before franco kernel r33 but now i am getting around 24k and 11k respectively i highlt doubt this is due to kernel (i didnt screw up anything (no custom roms nothing...)) can some confirm this ?? plzz
Why does it matter? Does the phone still run good? Can you notice any difference while using your phone normally?
Sent from my Nexus 5 using xda app-developers app
Kreateablaze said:
Why does it matter? Does the phone still run good? Can you notice any difference while using your phone normally?
Sent from my Nexus 5 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
in practical sense the phone works perfect apps run smoothly and battery life is awesome (5-6hrs)...but theoritical sense why did the scores become less ?? did franco limit the processor speed or something??
Benchmarks scores Dont mean anything at all
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
nemofbaby2010 said:
Benchmarks scores Dont mean anything at all
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
sir , can u plz run antutu from ur phone (i.e if ur using franco kernel)? and tell me ur score i know this may sound childish and geeky whatever u call it but it is still important for me
roydondsa said:
in practical sense the phone works perfect apps run smoothly and battery life is awesome (5-6hrs)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This bit is the only thing you should be caring about...
The 'score' is meaningless. Let it go, uninstall any benchmark apps and don't bother running a test ever again.
Put it this way...if you suddenly scored 234069823987693827469823764 after flashing a new kernel, but performance and battery actually got worse, which one would you prefer?
eddiehk6 said:
This bit is the only thing you should be caring about...
The 'score' is meaningless. Let it go, uninstall any benchmark apps and don't bother running a test ever again.
Put it this way...if you suddenly scored 234069823987693827469823764 after flashing a new kernel, but performance and battery actually got worse, which one would you prefer?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ok sir just uninstalled antutu and other benchmarks
roydondsa said:
i used to get around 32k in antutu and around 18k in quadrant before franco kernel r33 but now i am getting around 24k and 11k respectively i highlt doubt this is due to kernel (i didnt screw up anything (no custom roms nothing...)) can some confirm this ?? plzz
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi,
Franciso explained that he had decreased the CPU temp limit before thermal throttling, that could explain your lower score (earlier thermal throttle)... Check also your max CPU freq.
Let cool down your phone before you run Antutu and see, or play with the thermal settings (raise a bit the CPU temp before thermal throttling, core also).
The user is in its right to know why he have a lower score in benches between two different version of a kernel, whatever if a bench is useful or useless... Obviously if all is smooth and run perfectly for you, it's the principal.
nexus 5 is high end device, benchmark score doesn't effect the performance of device using any kernel.
i never experience any lag on my nexus, i always get different score in antutu.
r32 I got around 32k with antutu now I get around 29k on r33 but battery life is so incredible I'm willing to sacrifice benchmark points useless in day to day use .... isn't benchmarking moslty about bragging?
thank you very much
Hi, i'm seeking for the best and trusted Benchmark tool(s) for (android) smartphones. i tested antutum, vellano and etc but every time ran test, the result was different!
would you tell me why it happen and finally what's the best and trusted benchmark tools?
Thanks
itline said:
Hi, i'm seeking for the best and trusted Benchmark tool(s) for (android) smartphones. i tested antutum, vellano and etc but every time ran test, the result was different!
would you tell me why it happen and finally what's the best and trusted benchmark tools?
Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sooo basically antutu is best.
And your question about different results every run is simple.
Suppose you go to school by bicycle every day. You reach school in about 10 min. It will never happen that for a successive two days you take exactly 10.4 min to reach school.
Like wise proceasor amd ram managment has to undergo a lot of process even during a test run. They will mever be same for any two test rum.
Mostly if values differ like 11980 to 11900 its ok.
But values differ by gteater margin means the teater you use is not that effecient or there is aomthing runnimg in background which tester cant stop.
I hope it helped. So hit thanks if you gotnit
Sent from my SM-G355H using XDA Free mobile app
droid_god said:
Sooo basically antutu is best.
And your question about different results every run is simple.
Suppose you go to school by bicycle every day. You reach school in about 10 min. It will never happen that for a successive two days you take exactly 10.4 min to reach school.
Like wise proceasor amd ram managment has to undergo a lot of process even during a test run. They will mever be same for any two test rum.
Mostly if values differ like 11980 to 11900 its ok.
But values differ by gteater margin means the teater you use is not that effecient or there is aomthing runnimg in background which tester cant stop.
I hope it helped. So hit thanks if you gotnit
Sent from my SM-G355H using XDA Free mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks bro, for example i ran antutu on z5 compact 2 times. the result was ~5000 and ~6000! what is the best situation for running benchmark test? and do you suggest another tools?
itline said:
Thanks bro, for example i ran antutu on z5 compact 2 times. the result was ~5000 and ~6000! what is the best situation for running benchmark test? and do you suggest another tools?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So follow up.
Disable any battery saver option.
In development menu select standard background process.
And close every backgroumd apps.
Then run the test just after reboot.
Well its a very less value. Did you tried to overclock your device by any means
Sent from my SM-G355H using XDA Free mobile app