Im in the process of compiling android 4.2 for the skyrocket right now. i wanted to share the changes i needed to make to get it to keep compiling. i am not currently done with the compiling process right now but i have made a few changes that others can use to get them along the way as well. if you have any other changes i have not listed here PLEASE LET ME KNOW so i can add them to this google drive doc and always have it up to date. if there also is something you think should be in there PLEASE LET ME KNOW! i would like to collaborate with some people to get this built quick. we did an awesome job with jellybean and i have hope we can get this going quick.
Here is the google drive doc i have with the changes needed to get this compiling.
Google Drive Doc to build Android AOSP 4.2
if i come across any issues that i cannot solve i will be asking on this thread so please be checking back every once in a while if you are an experienced dev.
i have already made a few changes to the doc. im trying to make this as easy as possible to build.
i got it to completely build without any errors. http://d-h.st/Dvo
it does not boot though. and i dont know why. im going to need some help on this one.
im guessing maybe it has something to do with the ramdisk
sk8erwitskil said:
i got it to completely build without any errors. http://d-h.st/Dvo
it does not boot though. and i dont know why. im going to need some help on this one.
im guessing maybe it has something to do with the ramdisk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
so i diff'd the init.rc of the skyrocket cm10 and the init.rc and of the stock nexus4 system image from the android website and theyre exactly the same. so im guessing its not the init.rc. i tried copying over adbd and init from the n4 ramdisk but it gets stuck at the samsung logo.
edit: ignore that. i was looking at the same file. lol. this is what comes from no sleep
sk8erwitskil said:
i got it to completely build without any errors. http://d-h.st/Dvo
it does not boot though. and i dont know why. im going to need some help on this one.
im guessing maybe it has something to do with the ramdisk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thanks for sharing your efforts, ill be downloading the source over night and tackling this in the morning, with this ill have a head start on it, appreciate sharing your work.
sk8erwitskil said:
so i diff'd the init.rc of the skyrocket cm10 and the init.rc and of the stock nexus4 system image from the android website and theyre exactly the same. so im guessing its not the init.rc. i tried copying over adbd and init from the n4 ramdisk but it gets stuck at the samsung logo.
edit: ignore that. i was looking at the same file. lol. this is what comes from no sleep
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
the issue is most definitely in the ramdisk. im 99% sure. so if anyone with ramdisk knowledge wants to help it would be very appreciated. i only know a little bit about what it should look like. the BOOTCLASSPATH needs to be changed and some permissions have been changed in 4.2 but besides that im lost. the init.rc that it builds is completely wrong. i think we would be best off taking the cm10 one and editing it.
sk8erwitskil said:
the issue is most definitely in the ramdisk. im 99% sure. so if anyone with ramdisk knowledge wants to help it would be very appreciated. i only know a little bit about what it should look like. the BOOTCLASSPATH needs to be changed and some permissions have been changed in 4.2 but besides that im lost. the init.rc that it builds is completely wrong. i think we would be best off taking the cm10 one and editing it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
which kernel modules did you use? since you added the kernel during the build?
gs2usr said:
which kernel modules did you use? since you added the kernel during the build?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i didnt manually add any modules. i thought those get added from the vendor/samsung/skyrocket folder.
sk8erwitskil said:
i didnt manually add any modules. i thought those get added from the vendor/samsung/skyrocket folder.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
if the make file was not building you a kernel, then it shouldnt make you any modules, could you check if you have anything on dir system/lib/modules
gs2usr said:
if the make file was not building you a kernel, then it shouldnt make you any modules, could you check if you have anything on dir system/lib/modules
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
haha wow i totally missed that. it didnt add any modules. imma add the ones from cm10 to the zip and re-install and see if it works.
sk8erwitskil said:
haha wow i totally missed that. it didnt add any modules. imma add the ones from cm10 to the zip and re-install and see if it works.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
added the modules and it still gets stuck in a boot loop
sk8erwitskil said:
haha wow i totally missed that. it didnt add any modules. imma add the ones from cm10 to the zip and re-install and see if it works.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sounds good, keep us informed
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using Tapatalk 2
just going through the overlays you removed. In the msm8660 overlays, you could keep
Code:
<string name="config_datause_iface">rmnet_sdio0</string>
as that is in the config.xml in AOSP, but is set to rmnet0 by default.
Also for the location provider, in AOSP, the default is:
Code:
[COLOR="RoyalBlue"]<!-- Package name(s) containing location provider support.
These packages can contain services implementing location providers,
such as the Geocode Provider, Network Location Provider, and
Fused Location Provider. They will each be searched for
service components implementing these providers.
It is strongly recommended that the packages explicitly named
below are on the system image, so that they will not map to
a 3rd party application.
The location framework also has support for installation
of new location providers at run-time. The new package does not
have to be explicitly listed here, however it must have a signature
that matches the signature of at least one package on this list.
-->[/COLOR]
<string-array name="config_locationProviderPackageNames" translatable="false">
[COLOR="RoyalBlue"]<!-- The standard AOSP fused location provider -->[/COLOR]
<item>com.android.location.fused</item>
but in CM10, it's this:
Code:
[COLOR="RoyalBlue"] <!-- Component name of the service providing network location support. -->[/COLOR]
<string name="config_networkLocationProvider">com.google.android.location.NetworkLocationProvider</string>
[COLOR="RoyalBlue"] <!-- Component name of the service providing geocoder API support. -->[/COLOR]
<string name="config_geocodeProvider">com.google.android.location.GeocodeProvider</string>
Also, in the celox-common overlays for Phone, all of those configs are in AOSP, so I'm not sure why they would need to be removed.
Doubt that any of this matters in terms of you not being able to boot, but I just thought I would make a note.
the fix for the kernel being added is here:
ifeq ($(TARGET_PREBUILT_KERNEL),)
LOCAL_KERNEL := device/samsung/skyrocket/kernel
else
LOCAL_KERNEL := $(TARGET_PREBUILT_KERNEL)
endif
PRODUCT_COPY_FILES += \
$(LOCAL_KERNEL):kernel
add to device.mk
sk8erwitskil said:
added the modules and it still gets stuck in a boot loop
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh well, was worth a shot. Anyways should be added to the list, I probably wont be of much help until I have the source downloaded, but keep up the good work
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using Tapatalk 2
gs2usr said:
Oh well, was worth a shot. Anyways should be added to the list, I probably wont be of much help until I have the source downloaded, but keep up the good work
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i made some changes to device.mk to add the kernel to the out directory. hopefully it adds the modules as well. ill see once its done compiling again.
m4570d0n said:
just going through the overlays you removed. In the msm8660 overlays, you could keep
Code:
<string name="config_datause_iface">rmnet_sdio0</string>
as that is in the config.xml in AOSP, but is set to rmnet0 by default.
Also for the location provider, in AOSP, the default is:
Code:
[COLOR="RoyalBlue"]<!-- Package name(s) containing location provider support.
These packages can contain services implementing location providers,
such as the Geocode Provider, Network Location Provider, and
Fused Location Provider. They will each be searched for
service components implementing these providers.
It is strongly recommended that the packages explicitly named
below are on the system image, so that they will not map to
a 3rd party application.
The location framework also has support for installation
of new location providers at run-time. The new package does not
have to be explicitly listed here, however it must have a signature
that matches the signature of at least one package on this list.
-->[/COLOR]
<string-array name="config_locationProviderPackageNames" translatable="false">
[COLOR="RoyalBlue"]<!-- The standard AOSP fused location provider -->[/COLOR]
<item>com.android.location.fused</item>
but in CM10, it's this:
Code:
[COLOR="RoyalBlue"] <!-- Component name of the service providing network location support. -->[/COLOR]
<string name="config_networkLocationProvider">com.google.android.location.NetworkLocationProvider</string>
[COLOR="RoyalBlue"] <!-- Component name of the service providing geocoder API support. -->[/COLOR]
<string name="config_geocodeProvider">com.google.android.location.GeocodeProvider</string>
Also, in the celox-common overlays for Phone, all of those configs are in AOSP, so I'm not sure why they would need to be removed.
Doubt that any of this matters in terms of you not being able to boot, but I just thought I would make a note.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks I'll add that to the doc tomorrow
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using xda app-developers app
Hopefully you get this up &running. But you should soon, having Gs2 helping you out. Can't wait till this is complete so I can check it out. :good:
im trying to get aosp to compile the kernel like cm does. i added build/core/tasks/kernel.mk but it gets stuck on
Code:
out/target/product/skyrocket/obj/KERNEL_OBJ does not exist
when i check that folder does exist. for some reason its not recognizing it.
sk8erwitskil said:
im trying to get aosp to compile the kernel like cm does. i added build/core/tasks/kernel.mk but it gets stuck on
Code:
out/target/product/skyrocket/obj/KERNEL_OBJ does not exist
when i check that folder does exist. for some reason its not recognizing it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
if i just do that prebuilt kernel option then it doesnt add any modules. not sure how to fix that.
Related
As an experiment I am trying to rebuild some standard android applications and replace them in system/app on the G1. I have been through all the steps to get the source code and build for the dream platform and have built the various .apk files of interest (e.g. AlarmClock.apk, Browser.apk etc)
To put the files on the device I delete the old .apk and .odex files and copy my newly built .apk file on to the device. However when I try to run the application it crashes with the following message.
The application Alarm Clock (process com.android.alarmclock) has stopped unexpectedly. Please try again.
I know that replacing the applications like this is possible, because the AutoRotating Browser build works fine when copies over in this manner.
I'm using JF1.31 (RC8)
My initial reaction was that I was not signing the applications properly but having read some posts I think the default built .apk should have the right key already in it.
Another theory I have is that perhaps the applications from the head of the source tree are not compatible with the RC8 (or RC30) Android OS releases. Can anyone tell me how to get the source tree which corresponds to this baseline, I've done some reading around but cannot figure it out. I presume I need to do a repo init -u git://android.git.kernel.org/platofrm/manifest.git -b BASELINE but I can't figure out what BASELINE should be.
Many thanks in advance for any help you can give me!!!
There are some branches in android sources:
master
cupcake
release-1.0
Apps from the first two will not run on default G1, you need to reinstall a whole system. I think by default, following google docs you'll get master. So you need to download a release-1.0 sources.
I may be wrong, but that is what I'm see from my experience.
Thanks for that, I'll get the 1.0 branch downloaded and have a go with that.
Cheers for your help!
I was also trying to recompile some of the built-in apps, specifically the browser, but I can't even get it to build. I get a bunch of import errors, stating that it can't find some of the android libraries, such as android.net.http.AndroidHttpClient, android.os.AsyncTask, etc. I've got the android.jar from the SDK in my build path, and it finds some of them, such as android.webkit.URLUtil.
Can anyone shed some light on what I need to do to get it to see the missing libraries? Thanks.
UndeadCretin said:
Thanks for that, I'll get the 1.0 branch downloaded and have a go with that.
Cheers for your help!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There are around a dozen build breaks in release-1.0... all of them are due to missing header #includes in various .c and .h files. So, when it doesn't work, don't give up. Fix the breaks and everything will build properly.
Are you resigning the .apk files? Cuz you have to do that for them to work correctly.
Koush said:
There are around a dozen build breaks in release-1.0... all of them are due to missing header #includes in various .c and .h files. So, when it doesn't work, don't give up. Fix the breaks and everything will build properly.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yep I fixed these problems but I have now hit upon the following problem:
(unknown): error 17: Field android.hardware.SensorManager.LIGHT_NO_MOON has changed value from 0.0010f to 0.001f
******************************
You have tried to change the API from what has been previously released in
an SDK. Please fix the errors listed above.
******************************
I've been in and modified SensorManager back to 0.0010f and that let me build get further but I hit the same error again later in the build.
Given that release-1.0 should be a stable branch is it normal to get all these build issues?
Managed to fix the java issue by modifying public_api.xml. Then hit several more C++ problems which I fixed and finally I can build the lot!
Just tried building the AlarmClock application and running on the G1 and it works fine. Thanks everyone for your help!
>Managed to fix the java issue by modifying public_api.xml. Then hit several more C++ problems which I fixed and finally I can build the lot!
Can you write, what did you fix?
^ Agreed, let us know which files need modifying and what needs doing, i've been trying to get my release-1.0 build root working too!
Alternatively, UndeadCretin, could you build the firmware (release-1.0) with a modified framework-res i can send you?
Ok, I managed to compile it without any editing of xml.
Just added stdlib, string, vector headers to dozen of cpp/h.
worry said:
>Managed to fix the java issue by modifying public_api.xml. Then hit several more C++ problems which I fixed and finally I can build the lot!
Can you write, what did you fix?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
To fix the java issue, I modified frameworks/base/core/java/android/hardware/SensorManager to change the LIGHT_NO_MOON value to 0.0010f (from 0.001f) and in out/target/common/obj/PACKAGING I modified the <field name="LIGHT_NO_MOON" to have value-"0.0010f">
After this there were several other c++ files which were missing relevant includes. I'm afraid I didn't keep a note of these so cannot provide much detail but mostly they were missing one of the following
#include "stdlib.h"
#include "string.h"
#include "stdio.h"
I think one file needed the following include
#include <string>
and there were a couple of other files that needed other includes. The best way to find these is to google for the function name that isn't building and you should be able to find the appropriate include (that's how I did it).
Hope that helps a bit!
were you able to repo sync after adding the local_manifest.xml?
ximonx said:
were you able to repo sync after adding the local_manifest.xml?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I did try that previously but it didn't work. I don't think the relevant files for the dream build are available in the release-1.0 branch. This wasn't a problem for me since I'm only interested in building the applications which work fine with the generic build.
I would like to do the same for the mms application. Could you give me the steps or a link how to do it? I mean do I need the whole sources from android platform to do it? How can I just compile one application?
Phlogiston said:
I would like to do the same for the mms application. Could you give me the steps or a link how to do it? I mean do I need the whole sources from android platform to do it? How can I just compile one application?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I downloaded the whole Android source (the release-1.0 branch) and compiled the lot. It may be possible to just build the individual application but I do not know how. It is not vital to build for the dream platform if you only care about the applications since they will work fine with the generic build.
So the basic steps to start are:
Get yourself a Linux or Mac OS platform (I use Ubuntu running in VMWare on my XP box).
Follow the instructions here: http://source.android.com/download but when you come to repo init add the flag -b release-1.0
Fix various build problems
When recompiling individual apps to replace system apps is there a way of just building a single application or does the entire thing need making?
ximonx said:
When recompiling individual apps to replace system apps is there a way of just building a single application or does the entire thing need making?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My experience is that you have to do the whole thing if you are building from source. There is one way I know of to get around this, which is to use baksmali and smali.
Just to be clear, making the entire thing = build from source root?
ximonx said:
Just to be clear, making the entire thing = build from source root?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you are asking me--yes, that's what I mean. Make sure to build for dream-open as the target (it's generic by default).
I built this Rom straight from AOSP 5.0.0 I can't get any cell or data service. I used Ubuntu 14.04 to build with. I did not use any kitchen. Tried to learn to build manually. Everything else is working but bluetooth and the security setting. Guessing that bluetooth has something to do with the files missing to get cell/data going. Any help would be very gratefully appreciated.
https://mega.co.nz/#F!JlgDyaZT!A0N5t2VnDivbwdMTQkEQqQ the link to my ROM has to be installed via fastboot flash.
I did not flash your ROM but the problem is likely the apns-full-conf.xml in device/lge/hammerhead. Some of the Sprint APNs are not included and AOSP. You can grab a copy of the file from here and use it in place of the one from AOSP.
With Sprint I think it's a matter of the blobs that are used. You might want to look into how Slim Rom handled it as I believe Sprint data works on that rom. I'm not sure if Update PRL/Profile is working on it, but I tried a nightly a few days ago and data was working.
know.patience said:
I did not flash your ROM but the problem is likely the apns-full-conf.xml in device/lge/hammerhead. Some of the Sprint APNs are not included and AOSP. You can grab a copy of the file from here and use it in place of the one from AOSP.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah I tried that but did not work. Thanks anyway.
uodii said:
With Sprint I think it's a matter of the blobs that are used. You might want to look into how Slim Rom handled it as I believe Sprint data works on that rom. I'm not sure if Update PRL/Profile is working on it, but I tried a nightly a few days ago and data was working.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank has something to do with lge/qcom/broadcom files but can't figure out how to modify them.
I'm using Sprint and after updating all the proprietary vendor blobs, I got data working in my build by changing the APN file and removing OmaDmclient from the blobs for now.
dude1981 said:
Thank has something to do with lge/qcom/broadcom files but can't figure out how to modify them.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you havent figured it out on your own yet, I came across this site that might be just what you're looking for: http://nosemaj.org/howto-build-android-kitkat-nexus-5
It's for 4.4.X, but it might still apply to 5.0.X too. Look at the section called "Obtain the Vendor Proprietary Files"
know.patience said:
I'm using Sprint and after updating all the proprietary vendor blobs, I got data working in my build by changing the APN file and removing OmaDmclient from the blobs for now.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How did you update the blobs. That's the part I can't figure out??
uodii said:
If you havent figured it out on your own yet, I came across this site that might be just what you're looking for: http://nosemaj.org/howto-build-android-kitkat-nexus-5
It's for 4.4.X, but it might still apply to 5.0.X too. Look at the section called "Obtain the Vendor Proprietary Files"
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What I meant to say is trying not to use any kitchen's to build and learn to do it manually. I tried that guild but when building got a error that a prebuit apk was in device/ lge/hammerhead/proprietary
dude1981 said:
What I meant to say is trying not to use any kitchen's to build and learn to do it manually. I tried that guild but when building got a error that a prebuit apk was in device/ lge/hammerhead/proprietary
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Here use this: https://github.com/TheMuppets/proprietary_vendor_lge
These are the blobs used by CM and can be used for AOSP too. As I mentioned before, don't include OmaDmclient in the build.
IIRC, there are some .apks in the PRODUCT_COPY_FILES += of one of the device-partial.mks in Jameson's Github that will cause that error I think you are referring to. You have to use PRODUCT_PACKAGES for prebuilt apks or modify the build/core/MakeFile to allow using PRODUCT_COPY_FILES. Personally, I found it easier to use the PRODUCT_PACKAGES to list the prebuilt apps to be included in the build.
Welcome
I have started this thread for the THEORETICAL development of the mt6732/mt6752 from source if such a thing happened to exist which of course it does not.
While compiling from source is pretty well documented :good: compiling MTK is not so well documented especially the mt6732/6752.
I have tried to keep this thread as ambiguous as possible and hopefully we will be left in peace to iron out any difficulties.
DO's:
I am a Total Noob myself to compiling from source but experienced enough to use the xda search box, Google and Youtube first before asking any questions. If your still confused after using the above then by all means ask here.
DON'T s:
If your a noob who should happen upon this thread then by all means read and learn but please respect the dev's by not asking random question without searching first :fingers-crossed:
SHARING:
Please only share things of a sensitive nature with recognised members who you know and via the PM. :good:
Lets just see how far we can push this Kernel
Recommended Reading:
[GUIDE]Building a Kernel from source{Mediatek}
Build Kernel MT6577 - Can't boot after build
How To Port CyanogenMod Android To Your Own Device
XDA:DevDB Information
k01q_e k01q_h, Kernel for all devices (see above for details)
Contributors
bigrammy
Kernel Special Features: Remains to be seen
Version Information
Status: Testing
Created 2015-02-25
Last Updated 2015-02-25
I am here, reporting for duty. If anyone wants an extra "potato" because he has too much "ketchup" for use feel free to ask me
Just to be clear
I am new to compiling from source in any shape or form
I believe the kernel to be not a problem and I know dev's are working on getting our phone on cm and maybe others :fingers-crossed:
But me being me I am very curious and would like to understand how we would go about doing what @varun.chitre15 managed to do for the mt6582 Here
I have the PC all setup for building now thanks to @carliv great guide Here and the cm and android tut's I also found this useful guide on youtube by Dave Bennet Here
Our device is not on the cm or google repo so how do we add it locally.
Do we need any special commands for mediatek
Could we use the mt6582 repo and substitute or mod the files
As you can see I have more questions than answers as normal :laugh:
I dont want to tread on any toes here or take over current developing but just want to learn as said in the OP there is a lack of mtk guides regarding this.
If I missed a clear mtk guide then please post the link to it. :good:
In short your looking at manifests. http://wiki.cyanogenmod.org/w/Doc:_Using_manifests
carliv (I think) posted the device config on github - link in your SPFlash thread somewhere.
Found it: https://github.com/carliv/device_elephone_p6000?files=1
Vendor files
I have compiled and flashed a kernel, I've been running it for 24+ hours with no obvious issues. It's honestly very easy to just get it to build if you don't try to make major changes.
I have (very lazily) tried to change a couple of things in the config to fix the known issues (OTG, compass): unfortunately I have no way to test the OTG function right now, while the compass did not magically start working. On the other hand, the notification light issue which is introduced by V8.4 is not strictly or exclusively kernel-dependent, since I am running V8.3 with my own kernel and the notification function is intact. That's all I can share at the moment.
xenonism said:
I have compiled and flashed a kernel, I've been running it for 24+ hours with no obvious issues. It's honestly very easy to just get it to build if you don't try to make major changes.
I have (very lazily) tried to change a couple of things in the config to fix the known issues (OTG, compass): unfortunately I have no way to test the OTG function right now, while the compass did not magically start working. On the other hand, the notification light issue which is introduced by V8.4 is not strictly or exclusively kernel-dependent, since I am running V8.3 with my own kernel and the notification function is intact. That's all I can share at the moment.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can you switch on and post the /proc/config ?
Regarding the notification lights, I think v8.4 introduced the custom partition (might be wrong on that). Running grep -r "ro.notification.breath" /system/ the only result I got was services.odex (might have been settings.odex). I've bak(smali)ed it but couldn't see the difference between the two that would explain the change.
HypoTurtle said:
Can you switch on and post the /proc/config ?
Regarding the notification lights, I think v8.4 introduced the custom partition (might be wrong on that). Running grep -r "ro.notification.breath" /system/ the only result I got was services.odex (might have been settings.odex). I've bak(smali)ed it but couldn't see the difference between the two that would explain the change.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The config file is attached to the post, it's too big to paste it.
I have tried the new ROM which came out today, then flashed my kernel. I can't use either SIM card anymore. Flashed the boot.img that comes with the ROM - same. I guess I gotta go back to V8.3 for now.
The new ROM doesn't seem to be the same as the OTA: it reports as: Elephone_P6000_02_V8.0_20150206.
About the notification issues (which bothers me the most), I haven't had much time do to more experiments, but I was thinking this (which probably also led to my confusion*): there's a chance the functionality is not removed or shut down, at least in the intentions of the maker. After all, in V8.4 (and in the new ROM), when the phone is connected the light stays on, while notifications make it breath. While not a desirable behaviour (at least IMO), I wouldn't call it... a non-behaviour, so to say. So perhaps the functionality itself is intact but something is altering the way it works, for whatever reason. I also did some unpacking and grepping a few days ago, but I couldn't find anything useful.
* At some point I thought the issue was fixed because the light was breathing while connected to my PC, but it was probably because I had a notification to read.
xenonism said:
The config file is attached to the post, it's to big to paste it.
I have tried the new ROM which came out today, then flashed my kernel. I can't use either SIM card anymore. Flashed the boot.img that comes with the ROM - same. I guess I gotta go back to V8.3 for now.
The new ROM doesn't seem to be the same as the OTA: it reports as: Elephone_P6000_02_V8.0_20150206.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lets not speculate too much - but perhaps there was a minor board change between the first and second preorders, notification could be a problem with granting notification access (in settings) - could this be a selinux issue? It would explain why things like Light manager work - as you grant them notification access.
For lost Imei - can you compare the custom partition to the one in the ota?
If anyone needs an easier way to grab the 'ketchup', my GitHub has it. Click on my blog link in my signature.
BachMinuetInG said:
If anyone needs an easier way to grab the 'ketchup', my GitHub has it. Click on my blog link in my signature.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks bro,
Nice log
I was going to try use the sprout config as this is nice and clean Here when I have worked out how to do things that is.
My eyeballs are bleeding now with all this reading but from what I can see most of files are the same names so maybe we could just replace them with ours probably 98% ish
I did see one ROM some place for the mt6732/52 that had mt6582 references I just wish I could remember where I had seen it
Like I say I am a noob to this compiling and linux stuff so I maybe talking out of my ass :laugh:
bigrammy said:
Thanks bro,
Nice log
I was going to try use the sprout config as this is nice and clean Here when I have worked out how to do things that is.
My eyeballs are bleeding now with all this reading but from what I can see most of files are the same names so maybe we could just replace them with ours probably 98% ish
I did see one ROM some place for the mt6732/52 that had mt6582 references I just wish I could remember where I had seen it
Like I say I am a noob to this compiling and linux stuff so I maybe talking out of my ass :laugh:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm actually a noob too, and honestly I've only ever successfully built a fakeflash (temporary recovery) that didn't even work.
bigrammy said:
Thanks bro,
Nice log
I was going to try use the sprout config as this is nice and clean Here when I have worked out how to do things that is.
My eyeballs are bleeding now with all this reading but from what I can see most of files are the same names so maybe we could just replace them with ours probably 98% ish
I did see one ROM some place for the mt6732/52 that had mt6582 references I just wish I could remember where I had seen it
Like I say I am a noob to this compiling and linux stuff so I maybe talking out of my ass :laugh:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can anyone actually make a guide noob friendly to build kernel from source? I got kernel with me locally zip file I want to build it please any help?
Tech N You said:
Can anyone actually make a guide noob friendly to build kernel from source? I got kernel with me locally zip file I want to build it please any help?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think you can use the scripts in the root of the source code to build the kernel? make<something>.sh.
Make sure you're on Linux (Ubuntu preferred) and that you have all dependencies installed correctly. To execute the script, simply go to the Terminal, cd to the location, then type . make<something>.sh
Tech N You said:
Can anyone actually make a guide noob friendly to build kernel from source? I got kernel with me locally zip file I want to build it please any help?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Have a look at the README.
Does make menuconfig work here?
These few simple instructions from the readme file enable you to build a working kernel (at least in a Linux environment):
Code:
How to Build
kernel
======
1. Get the prebuilt cross compiler from AOSP website:
$ git clone https://android.googlesource.com/platform/prebuilts/gcc/linux-x86/arm/arm-eabi-4.6
2. Add required cross compiler to PATH:
$ export PATH=/YOUR_TOOLCHAIN_PATH/arm-eabi-4.6/bin:$PATH
$ export CROSS_COMPILE=arm-eabi-
3. Then use the following commands to build the kernel:
$ ./makeMtk k01q_e new k
make menuconfig can be made to work, but you need to set some parameters and I can't look into it right now.
You previously asked something about the custom partition, I need some guidance there as I am not familiar with the IMEI issue.
xenonism said:
These few simple instructions from the readme file enable you to build a working kernel (at least in a Linux environment):
Code:
How to Build
kernel
======
1. Get the prebuilt cross compiler from AOSP website:
$ git clone https://android.googlesource.com/platform/prebuilts/gcc/linux-x86/arm/arm-eabi-4.6
2. Add required cross compiler to PATH:
$ export PATH=/YOUR_TOOLCHAIN_PATH/arm-eabi-4.6/bin:$PATH
$ export CROSS_COMPILE=arm-eabi-
3. Then use the following commands to build the kernel:
$ ./makeMtk k01q_e new k
make menuconfig can be made to work, but you need to set some parameters and I can't look into it right now.
You previously asked something about the custom partition, I need some guidance there as I am not familiar with the IMEI issue.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yea wasn't sure about menuconfig as mtk uses projectconfig rather than def_configs.
In the custom partition there are files like /custom/etc/firmware/modem.img etc. When messing with a Flyme port it was these files (and possible conflicts in /system) that caused an IMEI:nul.
FYI I opened the custom partitions on windows using an ext viewer after running the imgs through sgs2toext4.
Kernel building Mediatek
Tech N You said:
Can anyone actually make a guide noob friendly to build kernel from source? I got kernel with me locally zip file I want to build it please any help?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not sure if you guys have seen or read this but it's a pretty comprehensive guide to building the mediatek kernel by @MasterAwesome and should really be compulsary for all kernel related things thread here http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2754513
@HypoTurtle
Regarding the custom partition this is or could be a problem for us now and in the future and may require further investigation. The cm sprout branch has the modem.img in the (normal place /system/etc/firmware) but as you say ours is in the custom partition which is probably to protect it from bad /system flashes
Thing is I see no normal type link to it in the /system/etc/firmware so it must be linked some other way which may explain why all my port attempts failed as none of them used a custom partition (Asus_X002)
Maybe we will have to repartition the emmc to a standard config and alter the kernel (if the links are set via the kernel that is) for cm and other ports to work smoothly as I am unsure just how everything is linked up.
I have not had much experience with custom partitions so someone one know's of a good info source please link it. :good:
Hopefully Master @Santhosh M can figure out what's going on with the custom partition :fingers-crossed:
bigrammy said:
@HypoTurtle
Regarding the custom partition this is or could be a problem for us now and in the future and may require further investigation. The cm sprout branch has the modem.img in the (normal place /system/etc/firmware) but as you say ours is in the custom partition which is probably to protect it from bad /system flashes
Thing is I see no normal type link to it in the /system/etc/firmware so it must be linked some other way which may explain why all my port attempts failed as none of them used a custom partition (Asus_X002)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The partition is symlinked from .../by-name/custom (which is symlinked by the kernel from dev/block/mmcblk0p12) to /dev/customimg which is mouned after an e2fsck to /custom. /custom isn't linked to /system, it's just added to the global environment (init.environ.rc), will need to check on the environ, I'm on flyme and it has /custom/lib added to the library path (which doesn't exist).
HypoTurtle said:
The partition is symlinked from .../by-name/custom (which is symlinked by the kernel from dev/block/mmcblk0p12) to /dev/customimg which is mouned after an e2fsck to /custom. /custom isn't linked to /system, it's just added to the global environment (init.environ.rc), will need to check on the environ, I'm on flyme and it has /custom/lib added to the library path (which doesn't exist).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Haha thanks that explains a lot of weird things perfectly. :good:
What's the problem or what is the issue here.
Mediatek compiling guide ( by masterawesome ) that you have linked to is not actually practically this mtk kernel is done and is just way too complicatedly explained.
There is no defconfig stuff or pulling config.gz from phone in mtk. In this new source its just simple. Set up your toolchain path. Execute the makeMtk followed by the project no u want. Get zImage and patch it for mtk header and merge it with stock ramdisk. For this newer mtk chipsets repack has an extra stuff where u have to be careful of kernel command line parameters.
That's it the kernel stuff in mtk
Here we have linage Oreo 8.1.0 built by XDA member gavin19
A working bootable lineage 8.1.0 that he hand built himself so all credit's go to him
We are needing a dev to go over and fix a few things like camera app not opening
Apart from that it seems fully functional and smooth,
Disclaimer:
We are not responsible for anything that may happen to your phone as a result of installing custom roms and/or kernels. you do so at your own risk and take the responsibility upon yourself.
Install full wipe
Flash latest firmware 8.something
Flash lineage 15.1
Flash gapps 8.1
Once os has booted go back Into recovery and flash magist 14.5 for root
Done
https://mega.nz/#F!rhpExB7L!ypCJwgXQqhQjaJ0muml1aw 15.1+ magist 14.5
https://mega.nz/#F!zlJBQJhJ!BJuv0brw0doTafuLTXJATw. Latest firmware
Thanks too.
LineageOS team
Xda member Gavin19
And all other open source Devs
Google+ community
Telegram group
ROM source
Tree of all official devices
Kernel Source
All thumbs up please send gav not me
Thank you @gavin19 for the build and thank you @mr911 for the thread :good:
omerbagi10 said:
Thank you @gavin19 for the build and thank you @mr911 for the thread :good:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah gav is the man, he devoted alot of time to building it smart guy, I've hit quite a big issue since running Oreo 8 I've fully restored fine back to vipor os through twrp restore but I'm guessing somehow Oreo has done something to my twrp and I can't back up any more I hit error createTarFork() process ended with ERROR=255 every time I try and do a back up re flashing twrp gives the same error but firmware flashed fine,
Edit fixed*
Coming from Oreo created a file called addons.d in system, stopping me from making new backups in twrp after flashing my original vipor os backup
1 dirty flash os once your original backup restores (so you don't have to start a fresh)
2 flash gapps
3 reinstall busy box/magist .zip
4 backups work perfect.
Most important thing here is that I'm not a dev. All I did was follow the build guide to the letter. After the initial 'breakfast lithium' stage, I copied this manifest into the .repo/local_manifests folder, ran 'repo sync' again, ran 'breakfast lithium' again then continued with the guide to the end.
Note, you'll need ~170GB of HDD space to build (unless you start trimming some packages). Build time for me with a 4690k at 4.4GHz/16GB RAM and on an SSD was still just over 3 hours.
The build isn't optimised (better toolchain, no removed packages to speed up build process etc) but it was pretty smooth. Not AICP smooth, but pretty close.
For installation I had to remove the device check because our working TWRP builds won't let it install (error 7). You'll need a recent firmware too. Another quirk is that if you try to install GApps immediately after flashing the ROM (for me at least) it complained that it was the incorrect Android version (once reported 7.1.2, then 6.0.0??), and it wouldn't boot properly. What you'll need to do is boot into the ROM and go through the usual setup then reboot and flash GApps and it'll work fine. For root, only Magisk 14.5 worked for me.
Calls, wi-fi, DT2W, sound etc all work.
Camera is broken. Vibrate only works partially (not on tap for example). Keyboard sometimes defaults to voice search for some reason. I didn't find any other issues except that I couldn't install apks from any other file manager than the Lineage one.
This was just a proof of concept. I was asking myself for months why the Mi Max (a bargain Mi Mix) and other Xiaomi devices have several Oreo ROMs (and with working cam), when we had nothing. It was either we were still waiting on some update/blobs etc **or** no-one had really tried. Turned out it was the latter.
EDIT: Moved to AICP from LOS since it's LOS-based and I much prefer it. Should be released very soon.
EDIT2 : https://forum.xda-developers.com/mi-mix/development/rom-aicp-13-1-t3746648
Which one is the latest firmware 8.1.4?
camoway said:
Which one is the latest firmware 8.1.4?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I posted a link to all the newest firmwares in my last comment.
gavin19 said:
I posted a link to all the newest firmwares in my last comment.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That really helped thanks some much!
gavin19 said:
Most important thing here is that I'm not a dev. All I did was follow the build guide to the letter. After the initial 'breakfast lithium' stage, I copied this manifest into the .repo/local_manifests folder, ran 'repo sync' again, ran 'breakfast lithium' again then continued with the guide to the end.
Note, you'll need ~170GB of HDD space to build (unless you start trimming some packages). Build time for me with a 4690k at 4.4GHz/16GB RAM and on an SSD was still just over 3 hours.
The build isn't optimised (better toolchain, no removed packages to speed up build process etc) but it was pretty smooth. Not AICP smooth, but pretty close.
For installation I had to remove the device check because our working TWRP builds won't let it install (error 7). You'll need a recent firmware too. Another quirk is that if you try to install GApps immediately after flashing the ROM (for me at least) it complained that it was the incorrect Android version (once reported 7.1.2, then 6.0.0??), and it wouldn't boot properly. What you'll need to do is boot into the ROM and go through the usual setup then reboot and flash GApps and it'll work fine. For root, only Magisk 14.5 worked for me.
Calls, wi-fi, DT2W, sound etc all work.
Camera is broken. Vibrate only works partially (not on tap for example). Keyboard sometimes defaults to voice search for some reason. I didn't find any other issues except that I couldn't install apks from any other file manager than the Lineage one.
This was just a proof of concept. I was asking myself for months why the Mi Max (a bargain Mi Mix) and other Xiaomi devices have several Oreo ROMs (and with working cam), when we had nothing. It was either we were still waiting on some update/blobs etc **or** no-one had really tried. Turned out it was the latter.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Mate can you shoot me a log dump of your rom? So that I can help you analyze and pinpoint the camera issue.
Also, fantastic work there mate!
Sent from my MI MIX using Tapatalk
E50AK said:
Mate can you shoot me a log dump of your rom? So that I can help you analyze and pinpoint the camera issue.
Also, fantastic work there mate!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Been testing for an hour so far just flash light not working, and camera, YouTube app no playback,plays fine through chrome.
Can't seem to find anything else broken
gavin19 said:
Most important thing here is that I'm not a dev. All I did was follow the build guide to the letter. After the initial 'breakfast lithium' stage, I copied this manifest into the .repo/local_manifests folder, ran 'repo sync' again, ran 'breakfast lithium' again then continued with the guide to the end.
Note, you'll need ~170GB of HDD space to build (unless you start trimming some packages). Build time for me with a 4690k at 4.4GHz/16GB RAM and on an SSD was still just over 3 hours.
The build isn't optimised (better toolchain, no removed packages to speed up build process etc) but it was pretty smooth. Not AICP smooth, but pretty close.
For installation I had to remove the device check because our working TWRP builds won't let it install (error 7). You'll need a recent firmware too. Another quirk is that if you try to install GApps immediately after flashing the ROM (for me at least) it complained that it was the incorrect Android version (once reported 7.1.2, then 6.0.0??), and it wouldn't boot properly. What you'll need to do is boot into the ROM and go through the usual setup then reboot and flash GApps and it'll work fine. For root, only Magisk 14.5 worked for me.
Calls, wi-fi, DT2W, sound etc all work.
Camera is broken. Vibrate only works partially (not on tap for example). Keyboard sometimes defaults to voice search for some reason. I didn't find any other issues except that I couldn't install apks from any other file manager than the Lineage one.
This was just a proof of concept. I was asking myself for months why the Mi Max (a bargain Mi Mix) and other Xiaomi devices have several Oreo ROMs (and with working cam), when we had nothing. It was either we were still waiting on some update/blobs etc **or** no-one had really tried. Turned out it was the latter.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
GREAT JOB!!!! :victory::victory::victory:
PLease, could you clarify?? You are saying you just synced LOS repo for lineage-15.1, then device trees (lithium and common) also from lineageos repo, blobs from TheMuppets, compiled, and it just worked and boots???
If it's like that it's great news. Means, among other things, that LOS sources for Oreo 8.1 are ready or almost almost and that if you update your worktree periodically you would be able to get a better rom just from source.
It also means that newbies like me trying for some days to build Oreo from other rom sources, AOSP ones, can still have hope
Thanks again and good job, man.
E50AK said:
Mate can you shoot me a log dump of your rom? So that I can help you analyze and pinpoint the camera issue.
Also, fantastic work there mate!
Sent from my MI MIX using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Where would it be? The closest thing I could find was a build.trace file
---------- Post added at 16:12 ---------- Previous post was at 16:03 ----------
albertoduqe said:
GREAT JOB!!!! :victory::victory::victory:
PLease, could you clarify?? You are saying you just synced LOS repo for lineage-15.1, then device trees (lithium and common) also from lineageos repo, blobs from TheMuppets, compiled, and it just worked and boots???
If it's like that it's great news. Means, among other things, that LOS sources for Oreo 8.1 are ready or almost almost and that if you update your worktree periodically you would be able to get a better rom just from source.
It also means that newbies like me trying for some days to build Oreo from other rom sources, AOSP ones, can still have hope
Thanks again and good job, man.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It really was just the build guide I linked to, except I changed 'repo init -u https://github.com/LineageOS/android.git -b cm-14.1' to 'repo init -u git://github.com/LineageOS/android.git -b staging/lineage-15.1'. The key was using the local manifest where I referenced specific repos/revisions (15.1 or staging/15.1, whichever was the latest). The first time I tried manually cloning those repos and literally copy pasting them into where they were meant to go, but clearly I made a mistake somewhere.
The second time i used the cache (I assigned 30GB) but it only used ~4GB and the build time was only ~10 minutes quicker. I wanted to remove a bunch of packages but I was honestly afraid of removing something essential. I'm pretty sure I could remove all the darwin packages since they're only for Mac, e.g adding these into the custom manifest
Code:
<!-- Removals -->
<remove-project name="platform/prebuilts/clang/host/darwin-x86" />
<remove-project name="platform/prebuilts/gcc/darwin-x86/aarch64/aarch64-linux-android-4.9" />
<remove-project name="platform/prebuilts/gcc/darwin-x86/arm/arm-eabi-4.8" />
<remove-project name="platform/prebuilts/gcc/darwin-x86/arm/arm-linux-androideabi-4.9" />
<remove-project name="platform/prebuilts/gcc/darwin-x86/host/i686-apple-darwin-4.2.1" />
<remove-project name="platform/prebuilts/gcc/darwin-x86/x86/x86_64-linux-android-4.9" />
<remove-project name="platform/prebuilts/python/darwin-x86/2.7.5" />
<remove-project name="platform/prebuilts/gdb/darwin-x86" />
<remove-project name="platform/prebuilts/go/darwin-x86" />
Could probably remove a bunch more to speed up the build but I'd need to be 100% sure they weren't needed.
We share the camera as several other devices too, but it's the Mi Max that I think might help us out the most given it's also Xiaomi. If someone with more knowledge could merge what they have for the cam (and so the flashlight too) then we might at least get the rear one working (I think they have a different front).
gavin19 said:
Where would it be? The closest thing I could find was a build.trace file
---------- Post added at 16:12 ---------- Previous post was at 16:03 ----------
It really was just the build guide I linked to, except I changed 'repo init -u https://github.com/LineageOS/android.git -b cm-14.1' to 'repo init -u git://github.com/LineageOS/android.git -b staging/lineage-15.1'. The key was using the local manifest where I referenced specific repos/revisions (15.1 or staging/15.1, whichever was the latest). The first time I tried manually cloning those repos and literally copy pasting them into where they were meant to go, but clearly I made a mistake somewhere.
The second time i used the cache (I assigned 30GB) but it only used ~4GB and the build time was only ~10 minutes quicker. I wanted to remove a bunch of packages but I was honestly afraid of removing something essential. I'm pretty sure I could remove all the darwin packages since they're only for Mac, e.g adding these into the custom manifest
Code:
<!-- Removals -->
<remove-project name="platform/prebuilts/clang/host/darwin-x86" />
<remove-project name="platform/prebuilts/gcc/darwin-x86/aarch64/aarch64-linux-android-4.9" />
<remove-project name="platform/prebuilts/gcc/darwin-x86/arm/arm-eabi-4.8" />
<remove-project name="platform/prebuilts/gcc/darwin-x86/arm/arm-linux-androideabi-4.9" />
<remove-project name="platform/prebuilts/gcc/darwin-x86/host/i686-apple-darwin-4.2.1" />
<remove-project name="platform/prebuilts/gcc/darwin-x86/x86/x86_64-linux-android-4.9" />
<remove-project name="platform/prebuilts/python/darwin-x86/2.7.5" />
<remove-project name="platform/prebuilts/gdb/darwin-x86" />
<remove-project name="platform/prebuilts/go/darwin-x86" />
Could probably remove a bunch more to speed up the build but I'd need to be 100% sure they weren't needed.
We share the camera as several other devices too, but it's the Mi Max that I think might help us out the most given it's also Xiaomi. If someone with more knowledge could merge what they have for the cam (and so the flashlight too) then we might at least get the rear one working (I think they have a different front).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=rs.pedjaapps.alogcatroot.app
Use this app and select the share or save button from the options menu.
Sent from my MI MIX using Tapatalk
E50AK said:
Where would it be? The closest thing I could find was a build.trace file
---------- Post added at 16:12 ---------- Previous post was at 16:03 ----------
It really was just the build guide I linked to, except I changed 'repo init -u https://github.com/LineageOS/android.git -b cm-14.1' to 'repo init -u git://github.com/LineageOS/android.git -b staging/lineage-15.1'. The key was using the local manifest where I referenced specific repos/revisions (15.1 or staging/15.1, whichever was the latest). The first time I tried manually cloning those repos and literally copy pasting them into where they were meant to go, but clearly I made a mistake somewhere.
The second time i used the cache (I assigned 30GB) but it only used ~4GB and the build time was only ~10 minutes quicker. I wanted to remove a bunch of packages but I was honestly afraid of removing something essential. I'm pretty sure I could remove all the darwin packages since they're only for Mac, e.g adding these into the custom manifest
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=rs.pedjaapps.alogcatroot.app
Use this app and select the share or save button from the options menu.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yh I keep seeing camera outlined in red
mr 911 said:
Yh I keep seeing camera outlined in red
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Okay, thanks. Are you guys available in telegram? It'd be more convenient for us to discuss over there. If yes, add me up - @AKWiro
Sent from my MI MIX using Tapatalk
gavin19 said:
Where would it be? The closest thing I could find was a build.trace file
---------- Post added at 16:12 ---------- Previous post was at 16:03 ----------
It really was just the build guide I linked to, except I changed 'repo init -u https://github.com/LineageOS/android.git -b cm-14.1' to 'repo init -u git://github.com/LineageOS/android.git -b staging/lineage-15.1'. The key was using the local manifest where I referenced specific repos/revisions (15.1 or staging/15.1, whichever was the latest). The first time I tried manually cloning those repos and literally copy pasting them into where they were meant to go, but clearly I made a mistake somewhere.
The second time i used the cache (I assigned 30GB) but it only used ~4GB and the build time was only ~10 minutes quicker. I wanted to remove a bunch of packages but I was honestly afraid of removing something essential. I'm pretty sure I could remove all the darwin packages since they're only for Mac, e.g adding these into the custom manifest
Could probably remove a bunch more to speed up the build but I'd need to be 100% sure they weren't needed.
We share the camera as several other devices too, but it's the Mi Max that I think might help us out the most given it's also Xiaomi. If someone with more knowledge could merge what they have for the cam (and so the flashlight too) then we might at least get the rear one working (I think they have a different front).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Would you mind sharing which projects you put in your local manifest? A copy-paste of the content would be great
Also if you guys don't mind adding me to telegram... I've been in contact with E50AK for a while now working on several nougat builds...
By the way camera errors point to camera service manager... E50AK is much better than me at logs but that points at some basic piece of camera drivers missing... Will need much more in depth work though...
---------- Post added at 07:09 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:45 PM ----------
As I said I am by no means an expert but for the camera I would personally start looking at what this line points:
E/[email protected](15065): Could not get passthrough implementation for ...
Where do the hardware/camera repo comes from? Is it Lineage? Maybe you could try removing that one if it is lineage and syncing google's one... But I'm talking without real good knowledge...
albertoduqe said:
Would you mind sharing which projects you put in your local manifest? A copy-paste of the content would be great
Also if you guys don't mind adding me to telegram... I've been in contact with E50AK for a while now working on several nougat builds...
By the way camera errors point to camera service manager... E50AK is much better than me at logs but that points at some basic piece of camera drivers missing... Will need much more in depth work though...
---------- Post added at 07:09 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:45 PM ----------
As I said I am by no means an expert but for the camera I would personally start looking at what this line points:
E/[email protected](15065): Could not get passthrough implementation for ...
Where do the hardware/camera repo comes from? Is it Lineage? Maybe you could try removing that one if it is lineage and syncing google's one... But I'm talking without real good knowledge...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is the local manifest I used - https://raw.githubusercontent.com/gavin19/manifest/master/manifest.xml
The local_manifest folder only gets created after the first run of 'breakfast lithium', then I pasted it into that folder and ran 'repo sync' again to pull those down.
I went back to AICP so I can't even dump any logs from Oreo.
As for the camera, I tried looking at the Mi Max ROMs to see if their repos had any different camera-related entries. I found some like this, but whether they would make any difference is unknown. The thing is, I don't want to run blind 3-hour builds on the off chance that something might work or not. I need to figure out how to reduce build time (aside from the ccache which I've already implemented). Surely it shouldn't take ~3 hours?
On that topic, since my out folder is already populated with ~28GB of files, how would I go about cleaning that up for a new build. Should I just delete it or ...? Are there any other folders I should remove before trying further builds or any commands that i should run?
gavin19 said:
This is the local manifest I used - https://raw.githubusercontent.com/gavin19/manifest/master/manifest.xml
The local_manifest folder only gets created after the first run of 'breakfast lithium', then I pasted it into that folder and ran 'repo sync' again to pull those down.
I went back to AICP so I can't even dump any logs from Oreo.
As for the camera, I tried looking at the Mi Max ROMs to see if their repos had any different camera-related entries. I found some like this, but whether they would make any difference is unknown. The thing is, I don't want to run blind 3-hour builds on the off chance that something might work or not. I need to figure out how to reduce build time (aside from the ccache which I've already implemented). Surely it shouldn't take ~3 hours?
On that topic, since my out folder is already populated with ~28GB of files, how would I go about cleaning that up for a new build. Should I just delete it or ...? Are there any other folders I should remove before trying further builds or any commands that i should run?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'll look into the local folder and the rest you say. I've always had to create it manually as haven't built any supported devices from any rom source (what would be the point other than in a situation like we have with Mix and oreo?)
Although I know some guys around here will be much more helpful than myself with the logs and ideas to fix camera, I can see that what you share is just a camera package, that is, the app that uses the hardware. The problem in the rom is at the driver level, I think, and will probably be fixed changing some stuff in hardware or whereabouts...
As to building time and resources: if you didn't erase your working dir, after the first build compiling can take as little as 15 minutes, or up to say 30, depending on the amount of modifications to your sources. The big thing you already did and will not take so long until you make clobber before another one.
---------- Post added at 08:24 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:55 PM ----------
gavin19 said:
This is the local manifest I used - https://raw.githubusercontent.com/gavin19/manifest/master/manifest.xml
The local_manifest folder only gets created after the first run of 'breakfast lithium', then I pasted it into that folder and ran 'repo sync' again to pull those down.
I went back to AICP so I can't even dump any logs from Oreo.
As for the camera, I tried looking at the Mi Max ROMs to see if their repos had any different camera-related entries. I found some like this, but whether they would make any difference is unknown. The thing is, I don't want to run blind 3-hour builds on the off chance that something might work or not. I need to figure out how to reduce build time (aside from the ccache which I've already implemented). Surely it shouldn't take ~3 hours?
On that topic, since my out folder is already populated with ~28GB of files, how would I go about cleaning that up for a new build. Should I just delete it or ...? Are there any other folders I should remove before trying further builds or any commands that i should run?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I found this line strange in your local manifest:
<project name="LineageOS/android_hardware_qcom_media" path="device/qcom/media" remote="github" revision="staging/lineage-15.1" />
Did it came like this after breakfast you say? Cause that is a hardware project that exists already in the manifest.xml and goes to hardware/qcom/media and here it goes to device/qcom... Curious...
Might be one of the things making it work...
albertoduqe said:
I found this line strange in your local manifest:
<project name="LineageOS/android_hardware_qcom_media" path="device/qcom/media" remote="github" revision="staging/lineage-15.1" />
Did it came like this after breakfast you say? Cause that is a hardware project that exists already in the manifest.xml and goes to hardware/qcom/media and here it goes to device/qcom... Curious...
Might be one of the things making it work...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The manifest file was added by me. The 'breakfast' command only generates the local_manifests folder, but it doesn't add anything to it. I just discovered that that was where custom manifests are supposed to go.
I copied that manifest from another Oreo project (can't remember which offhand) and just replaced the device names to lithium and the revisions to whichever were the latest for the corresponding repos. I wasn't sure about that line either since it didn't appear to be especially relevant. The only reason I made the manifest was to make sure the build process was pulling in all the lithium-related repos since I couldn't find reference to them elsewhere.
gavin19 said:
The manifest file was added by me. The 'breakfast' command only generates the local_manifests folder, but it doesn't add anything to it. I just discovered that that was where custom manifests are supposed to go.
I copied that manifest from another Oreo project (can't remember which offhand) and just replaced the device names to lithium and the revisions to whichever were the latest for the corresponding repos. I wasn't sure about that line either since it didn't appear to be especially relevant. The only reason I made the manifest was to make sure the build process was pulling in all the lithium-related repos since I couldn't find reference to them elsewhere.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah that is the way it is when device is not supported by rom: breakfast doesn't pull anything. It does for lithium nougat but lineage 15.1 is not out, so not ready.
Well it is more than clear that you did perfect as it worked. That line puts a project in a path that's not intended for but either it doesn't conflict with anything or it somehow should be there.
Thanks for the info and replies.
Hope u keep working on it and we can help you each in its measure to make it a fully working rom!!
So I began with this whole endeavour like a week ago and while I've learnt a couple of things I'm still hitting my head against a wall. The issues seem to be regarding the Kernel I'm using, someone mentioned that I'm supposed to be using the source Kerner of the ROM but isn't the Kernel device specific?
I'm also getting some errors regarding neverallows, a user suggested to ignore them but as far as I understand you should not be doing that.
So any pointers, suggestions or tips?
Here are my sources as well as the errors I'm getting.
Device tree: https://github.com/celepharn/device_xiaomi_vince/tree/havoc-11
Vendor tree: https://github.com/celepharn/vendor_xiaomi_vince/tree/havoc-11
Kernel Source: https://github.com/celepharn/kernel_dark_ages_vince
ROM Source: https://github.com/Havoc-OS
Haste or Dogbin URL (here are the errors as displayed in the terminal): https://del.dog/wiryckoful.txt
look like the compilation stop because of sepolicy usually you just remove and it would compile
ineedroot69 said:
look like the compilation stop because of sepolicy usually you just remove and it would compile
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Remove what exactly? I'm pretty new to this.
celephrn said:
Remove what exactly? I'm pretty new to this.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i uploaded the compile log on pastebin so it's much easier to read
on line 493 its where it stop
also notice on line 499 it say " Please fix the policy "
ineedroot69 said:
i uploaded the compile log on pastebin so it's much easier to read
on line 493 its where it stop
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ahh you mean in the domain.te and coredomain.te files? I'm doing that right now, will get back to you when I'm through. Thanks!
ineedroot69 said:
i uploaded the compile log on pastebin so it's much easier to read
on line 493 its where it stop
also notice on line 499 it say " Please fix the policy "
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Did that, and got error in
#error "Please don't include <linux/compiler-gcc.h> directly, include <linux/compiler.h> instead."
it's a line in the compiler-gcc.h file located in /havoc/kernel/xiaomi/vince/include/linux
Any clues on how to proceed? I'm going to try with clang to see if it works.
Edit: here's the code in said file.
celephrn said:
Did that, and got error in
#error "Please don't include <linux/compiler-gcc.h> directly, include <linux/compiler.h> instead."
it's a line in the compiler-gcc.h file located in /havoc/kernel/xiaomi/vince/include/linux
Any clues on how to proceed? I'm going to try with clang to see if it works.
Edit: here's the code in said file.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
usually sepolicy are easy to fix since they point out line # of code and the file location causing issue on your case thou look like you have allow and not allow parameter conflict
also i forgot to say .te file are viewable as text so gedit works on them
ineedroot69 said:
usually sepolicy are easy to fix since they point out line # of code and the file location causing issue on your case thou look like you have allow and not allow parameter conflict
also i forgot to say .te file are viewable as text so gedit works on them
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I did that, then I got some other errors and the suggestion was to switch to clang-proton, which I did. I got to the part of kernel image building only to fail once again.
These are my updated sources:
Device tree: https://github.com/celepharn/device_xiaomi_vince/tree/havoc-11
Vendor tree: https://github.com/celepharn/vendor_xiaomi_vince/tree/havoc-11
Kernel Source: https://github.com/celepharn/kernel_dark_ages_vince
ROM Source: https://github.com/Havoc-OS
Haste or Dogbin URL (here are the errors as displayed in the terminal): https://del.dog/locorfyvas
I'm certain the issue is building the kernel image, the Image.gz file but don't know how else to proceed, is the kernel I'm using outdated or something?
I'm also getting issues with lines of qseecomi.h located in /kernel/xiaomi/vince/include/soc/qcom, for example in line 108 stating I should put packed after "struct" but such instruction is not clear to me, perhaps would it be something like this?
__struct packed qsee_apps_region_info_ireq {
uint32_t qsee_cmd_id;
uint32_t addr;
uint32_t size;
};
Try to hire a Good developer to solve this issue! Good luck buddy!
mehtamanisha169 said:
Try to hire a Good developer to solve this issue! Good luck buddy!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I got it working, the build is now complete. Thanks!