3.0.42 TAMCORE and sluggish chrome - HTC Sensation

I've been using opensensation for a while now and I've tried using the latest TAMCORE kernel but whenever I open chrome it becomes molasses. When I switch down to version .38 the slow down goes away. Does anyone one else experience this? Just trying to see if it is something on my end.
Sent from my HTC Sensation using xda app-developers app

This should be asked in questions and answers
Sent from my Sensation

Wrong section.ugh
Sent from my HTC Sensation XE with Beats Audio Z715e using Tapatalk 2

dancnpete said:
I've been using opensensation for a while now and I've tried using the latest TAMCORE kernel but whenever I open chrome it becomes molasses. When I switch down to version .38 the slow down goes away. Does anyone one else experience this? Just trying to see if it is something on my end.
Sent from my HTC Sensation using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have had nothing but problems with Tamcore on AOKP with my configuration, I think its more of a problem on my end than it is on his kernel. But I switched to CM9 and am running the stock kernel with no problems. My dad on the other hand can run AOKP with Tamcore fine, I don't know what the difference is. I've never tried open sensation so I can't vouch for that. What gov. are you using?
Ohh and BTW, if a mod doesn't get this thread moved soon, your going to get a new one ripped by all the 12 year old 'devs' who will yell at you because this is the Dev section, if they were a real dev they'd politley tell you "wrong section, try to post in the Q&A forum first, but heres the problem.." After doing so, they'll most likely refer you to their donate button in their signature in case one of their 13 posts have helped you or someone else.
- Just a heads up.

fandroid93 said:
I have had nothing but problems with Tamcore on AOKP. Thats why I switched to CM9 lol. My dad on the other hand can run AOKP with Tamcore fine, I don't know what the difference is. I've never tried open sensation so I can't vouch for that. What gov. are you using?
Ohh and BTW, if a mod doesn't get this thread moved soon, your going to get a new one ripped by all the 12 year old 'devs' who will yell at you because this is the Dev section, if they were a real dev they'd politley tell you "wrong section, try to post in the Q&A forum first, but heres the problem.." After doing so, they'll most likely refer you to their donate button in their signature in case one of their 13 posts have helped you or someone else.
- Just a heads up.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for the help, frankly I find it quite difficult to know where to start a discussion nowadays. I'm not a developer so I should have started this in the Q&A section (I know that now). thank you for politely showing me the way.

dancnpete said:
Thanks for the help, frankly I find it quite difficult to know where to start a discussion nowadays. I'm not a developer so I should have started this in the Q&A section (I know that now). thank you for politely showing me the way.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No problem man. I wish I could help more.

If you think it's a bug in my kernel (however, I don't have a device with this problem), create an entry in my bugtracker and provide real infos (every other report would get ignored and closed). Currently you tell us nothing about your settings.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk 2

TamCore said:
If you think it's a bug in my kernel (however, I don't have a device with this problem), create an entry in my bugtracker and provide real infos (every other report would get ignored and closed). Currently you tell us nothing about your settings.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't think my particular problems are with your kernel but I think they are from my configuration. Like I said, my dad runs your kernel just fine but whatever I must do with system kill must cause problems with your kernel. I should have been more specific before I said "I have nothing but problems with TamCore" because at one point TamCore was the only kernel I ran because it was so smooth and had no issues whatsoever, its definitely more of a problem on my end, not yours.

Maybe. But the OP is just asking. He could get more help if he would tell us a bit about his settings.

TamCore said:
Maybe. But the OP is just asking. He could get more help if he would tell us a bit about his settings.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
and this is where my ignorance kicks in, what particular info would you like, I assume I'd have to do a logcat, but I've never done one before, should I reload the .42 kernel and try running chrome with a program like catlog running? thanks again for your work and your help,

dancnpete said:
and this is where my ignorance kicks in, what particular info would you like
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lets start with simple infos like CPU Settings. (Min/Max Freq, Governor, Scheduler, all you find)
dancnpete said:
I assume I'd have to do a logcat, but I've never done one before
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
blahbl4hblah made a nice guide for this http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1616059
dancnpete said:
should I reload the .42 kernel and try running chrome with a program like catlog running?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Try to reproduce your problem with every release that is newer than the .38 one. This would help very much.

Thanks I will when I get back in front of a real computer.
Sent from my HTC Sensation using xda app-developers app

Related

Anyone want to test a CM 7 kanged build I just made?

I just need someone to test this quick. It's based of the CM 7 source. Nothing has been changed or modified. I just compiled it. I will be doing daily builds everyday
http://www.megaupload.com/?d=ZEWGSEAA
Alt link: http://db.tt/9u9SL1E
Just let me know if it boots and runs ok. It should though
If I get confirmation it works I'm posting a thread under dev that I will update everyday
File unavailable.
Sent from my LG-P999 using XDA App
Mistic99 said:
File unavailable.
Sent from my LG-P999 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just saw that, it could be that I JUST uploaded it. I'm also uploading it to my drop box. I'll post that link too when it's done
http://db.tt/9u9SL1E
Sent from my HTC Glacier using Tapatalk
graffixnyc said:
I just need someone to test this quick. It's based of the CM 7 source. Nothing has been changed or modified. I just compiled it. I will be doing daily builds everyday
http://www.megaupload.com/?d=ZEWGSEAA
Just let me know if it boots and runs ok. It should though
If I get confirmation it works I'm posting a thread under dev that I will update everyday
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why bother posting it in developer section if it's the same as the nightly except for the fact that you are compiling it yourself?
mapin0518 said:
Why bother posting it in developer section if it's the same as the nightly except for the fact that you are compiling it yourself?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
because when I mentioned I was doing builds for myself a bunch of people asked me to share them. That's why.. And before I even thought about posting them I asked Chris if it would be ok.
Mistake..
.....
graffixnyc said:
because when I mentioned I was doing builds for myself a bunch of people asked me to share them. That's why.. And before I even thought about posting them I asked Chris if it would be ok.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
plus there is no nightly tonight so far so it gives crack flashers something to flash I dont think there were any device specific commits since last build but there have been GB base commits
Just flashed and booted OK.
Sent from my LG-P999 using Tapatalk
graffixnyc said:
plus there is no nightly tonight so far so it gives crack flashers something to flash I dont think there were any device specific commits since last build but there have been GB base commits
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ah ok, just curious what this would add, i'll give it a shot!
It runs good so far.
Sent from my LG-P999 using XDA App
Done. It booted fine!

[Q] Is there anyone running a "custom built" version of CM7 that they could share?

[Q] Is there anyone running a "custom built" version of CM7 that they could share?
Hi all...
I would like to try a CM7 ROM on my Infuse but I am in no way too technical to make my own from source so...
I am wondering if there is anyone here who has built a nice CM7 from source that could maybe share so I can give it a go???
I hope this is not too much to ask and I thank you in advance...
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I997 using xda premium
Umm here is a version of CM7 we have had for a while now.
xIC-MACIx said:
Umm here is a version of CM7 we have had for a while now.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for the response but i don't see a d/l link to a specific ROM.
Perhaps I am blind but that is what I'm looking for... a working version that someone has created from source that I can flash via CWM...
Sent from my SensatioN-al Hellraising Rogers Infuse SGH-I997R B-)
yiannisthegreek said:
Thanks for the response but i don't see a d/l link to a specific ROM.
Perhaps I am blind but that is what I'm looking for... a working version that someone has created from source that I can flash via CWM...
Sent from my SensatioN-al Hellraising Rogers Infuse SGH-I997R B-)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ya I just got done looking myself, I could have sworn I saw a link in there somewhere, I guess not...
Cm7 builds sent aloud to be posted
Sent from my SGH-I997 using XDA App
Ya never looked into it till now, if I had a comp that could handle all of that and I had a better grasp on Linux, I would try building my own from the source.
xIC-MACIx said:
Ya never looked into it till now, if I had a comp that could handle all of that and I had a better grasp on Linux, I would try building my own from the source.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's my point exactly... I'd really like to try it but have no idea how to compile it on my own...
Sent from my SensatioN-al Hellraising Rogers Infuse SGH-I997R B-)
yiannisthegreek said:
That's my point exactly... I'd really like to try it but have no idea how to compile it on my own...
Sent from my SensatioN-al Hellraising Rogers Infuse SGH-I997R B-)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you look through the cm7 thread a few users have posted it. Just that others hate when they do so they discourage it on that thread because they don't want extra bug reports.
Sent from my SGH-I997 using xda premium
nelomen said:
If you look through the cm7 thread a few users have posted it. Just that others hate when they do so they discourage it on that thread because they don't want extra bug reports.
Sent from my SGH-I997 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If there is any they will get deleted read the op Linux doesn't want any releases on there strictly none.
Sent from my SGH-I997 using XDA App
LG_iiNsTiiNcT said:
If there is any they will get deleted read the op Linux doesn't want any releases on there strictly none.
Sent from my SGH-I997 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Perhaps then if someone can post it / them here it would be appreciated...
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
yiannisthegreek said:
Perhaps then if someone can post it / them here it would be appreciated...
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No its not that he does not want it posted on that thread, he does not want it posted at all until it is finished.
If you look at other rom threads there are tons of questions that should not have been there. What he is doing is like a semi private beta, it will help fix problems faster without having to answer simple questions. Things like who do I flash this, will it work with this kernel, and such.
Now I am not saying that its not on the web but you will have to find it and not ask for a link.
I dedicated a virtual machine to building CM7, so I can pull from the source rep and do a snapshot build pretty much anytime.
Problem is that we are not supposed to share it. LinuxBozo posted somewhere why this restriction, but I don't recall the link. Maybe someone could remind what the url to that post is.
Adriano
Sent from my SGH-I997 using XDA App
People, if you want to share your own builds, I can't stop you. Hell, I don't even really care. I just ask if you do share, don't post them in the original thread, and make sure that whoever you are sharing with understands that this is currently not finished, has issues (especially with BT right now), and that unless they know what 'dmesg' and 'logcat' are, they will get absolutely no support from me and are on their own.
LinuxBozo said:
People, if you want to share your own builds, I can't stop you. Hell, I don't even really care. I just ask if you do share, don't post them in the original thread, and make sure that whoever you are sharing with understands that this is currently not finished, has issues (especially with BT right now), and that unless they know what 'dmesg' and 'logcat' are, they will get absolutely no support from me and are on their own.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You guys have to understand from his point of view. Do u know how many questions or post saying things need to get fixed would pop up the whole reason around building your own from source is that if you can do that you should be able to put out questions and answer that help instead of simple or complex things that have being covered if you have the basic understanding and you can actually help with issues address them correctly ina Manet that helps fix it than its easier to get things sorted out before a release. So he doesn't want them in the original thread. I would suggest if you can find someone to share it since you have the approval now have them pm you not share it over the thread or any other thread and don't share it your self so it doesn't cause the other thread or any other to get cramped with questions that can or can't be answered. So if you get it keep it to yourself to help with that factor
Sent from my SGH-I997 using XDA App
ok, so given that it is better not to post links to home-brew builds on these forums, I figured to put mine here:
http://tools.1url.ws/cm7infuse.php
for who's craving to run CM7 on their infuse, and doesn't have the time/setup/etc. to build it on his own.
All the warnings, disclaimers, etc. stand of course. No support provided, no guarantee I'll build more in the future. As time allows every few days I plan to grab the latest sources and do a new build to post it there.
At this time I'm using the 10/12/2011 build, and aside from the known issues, works pretty well for me. But then again, you might end up having a totally different experience.
- Adriano

[INFO] Why we don't have ICS yet + more info about it

Hi, I have noticed a ton of people curious about why AT&T people do not have ICS yet, so I thought I would answer that once and for all. I admit that I and others have gotten a little mad whenever people ask about this, but it seems they are not able to really find a clear answer, so here it is.
If you feel like this is well done, please sticky it at least until we get it all figured out.
I figure this would be best said i a Q and A type form.
Q: What is ICS, and why does everyone want it so bad?
ICS or "Ice Cream Sandwich" is android version 4.0.x. the next version, 4.1 Jellybean was just released as a slightly less important update, but ICS brought huge changes from Ginger Bread (2.3.x) the previous phone version (3.x HoneyComb was tablet only). ICS brings a slicker, darker, and better looking user interface, as well as many performance enhancements. Most of us want it more because it seems like we should than because it is actually that much better. That said it is still a great update, and most people will be happy to see it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Q: Why is it so hard to get ICS for our phone, while others have it even though it is not officially out?
The main reason is our locked bootloader. That means it is not possible to flash or boot a custom kernel unless it is signed with Motorola's key. That is obviously impossible.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Q: What is a kernel?
the kernel is a major part of any operating system. you can think of it as a sort of layer between hardware and software. It is the part of an OS that communicates directly with a device's hardware. Android is based off the open source Linux kernel, meaning it is free for anybody to build and modify. However, Motorola has only released the source for the ME865, and partially for the MB865, meaning we can't really build a kernel anyways. Then of course, even if we could build one, we wouldn't be able to boot it with our locked bootloader.
ICS is not really complete without the newer kernel that goes with it
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What is Kexec, and is there any way to unlock the bootloader
The fact that I grouped these together would probably lead you to correctly believe they are related. Lets start with the second half. Simply put, NO. I hate to say it, but there is very little hope of EVER unlocking our bootloader, unless Motorola decides to do something like HTC did and allow unlocking.
Kexec is a method of hot switching kernels while still booted. It is actually just a linux tool that you can use on a computer, but it has been built for android essentially allowing you to bypass the bootloader. Theoretically it would be an easy way to run custom kernels. Then why don't we? Well a few reasons. One, we can't really get one built to begin with, especially because, at least to my knowledge, jimbridgman is the only one who actually knows what he is doing with kernel building, and he is only half here now that he got his fany new SGS3. Two, it does not work great. I am not sure the latest version is working at all on our phone, and even if it did, only one processor comes up, meaning it is really slow.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Q: What's the deal with these Droid 3 builds that supposedly boot?
Some people managed to build ICS for the droid 3 based of a 2.3.6 kernel. that means you can boot it on a stock GB kernel, and therefore you do not need to unlock the bootloader. Unfortunately that means it is not totally ICS, but it is still pretty good. Of course they are for a cdma phone, so that means no data, no calls, and no gps, making it kind of useless.
I am not going to give a link to them, but if you are really interested go search around. any of the Droid 3 AOKP and CM9 builds will boot just fine. Find more info in the dev section, but please don't start a thread asking about it.
We have been trying to port these to work for us, but that is proving more difficult than expected, and with ICS just around the corner, I don't want to put time into it. I do think it is possible, and if you are a dev looking to give it a shot, PM me and I will tell you all I know, and try to help out as much as I can.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Great thread!
Thanks for putting this together!
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using xda premium
jimbridgman said:
Great thread!
Thanks for putting this together!
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thanks. I felt it was needed. let me know if I forgot to say something important.
Sent from my MB865 using xda premium
Perhaps this will hopefully curb some of the incessant "where's my ice cream sandwich" or "make me a rom based on ICS" threads here. Nice job, and as always, your work here is both highly appreciated and revered.
Sent from my MB865 using xda premium
Nice work kras, as always.
Sent from my MB865 using xda premium
Hell i thought this thread was going to give me info on why att hadn't released ics for us yet. Just kidding, good job. If this thread falls down the list ill bump it so maybe it will help some of the new people and we won't get any more new threads about ics.
Sent from my MB865 using xda premium
Apex_Strider said:
Perhaps this will hopefully curb some of the incessant "where's my ice cream sandwich" or "make me a rom based on ICS" threads here. Nice job, and as always, your work here is both highly appreciated and revered.
Sent from my MB865 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No,Most likely once posts stop on this thread and it makes it to the second page we will see more questions im sure lol
Sent from my MB865 using xda premium
rdavisct said:
No,Most likely once posts stop on this thread and it makes it to the second page we will see more questions im sure lol
Sent from my MB865 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
that's why I asked for sticky
Sent from my MB865 using xda premium
The good news is that the "3rd quarter" is tomorrow! Which knowing motorola and AT&T, could mean whatever.
Take that with a grain of salt. Lol.
Sent from my MB865 using xda premium
Fall of Enosis said:
The good news is that the "3rd quarter" is tomorrow! Which knowing motorola and AT&T, could mean whatever.
Take that with a grain of salt. Lol.
Sent from my MB865 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
so is September
Sent from my MB865 using xda premium
Why don't we have a vanilla rom? Is it due again to the locked bootloader?
Sent from my MB865
gvsukids said:
Why don't we have a vanilla rom? Is it due again to the locked bootloader?
Sent from my MB865
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yep. same thing. we have a hard time compiling any also source as you need a custom kernel
Sent from my MB865 using xda premium
Nice post..
Just one thing to inform about your last question's ans.. DROID 3'S ROMS DONT WORK ON OUR PHONE. IT WILL BOOTLOOP. SO DO NOT TRY FLASHING THEIR AOKP OR CM.. without backups and sufficient knowledge and experience atleast.. some changes have to be made in the rom before flashing.. i am trying to find all the files we must replace to get them working on our phone.. and just a FYI for those of you that wanna try.. other than droid 3, bionic is our nearest relative.. so u can edit and try their roms as well.. i did kinda get cm9 of bionic after replacing some required files.. but it bootlooped.. and of course bionic is cdma.. so.. good luck..
Sent from my MB865 using Tapatalk 2
Ravikirancg said:
Nice post..
Just one thing to inform about your last question's ans.. DROID 3'S ROMS DONT WORK ON OUR PHONE. IT WILL BOOTLOOP. SO DO NOT TRY FLASHING THEIR AOKP OR CM.. without backups and sufficient knowledge and experience atleast.. some changes have to be made in the rom before flashing.. i am trying to find all the files we must replace to get them working on our phone.. and just a FYI for those of you that wanna try.. other than droid 3, bionic is our nearest relative.. so u can edit and try their roms as well.. i did kinda get cm9 of bionic after replacing some required files.. but it bootlooped.. and of course bionic is cdma.. so.. good luck..
Sent from my MB865 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You are not right. I can prove it. The latest droid 3 AOKP and Cm9 builds will boot just fine, with no radio
You should also add Why any other leak releases of atrix 2 ICS will not work on att atrix 2..... Sick of will this work on my att..... About to be like yea we all use it lol JK.....
Ravikirancg said:
DROID 3'S ROMS DONT WORK ON OUR PHONE. IT WILL BOOTLOOP. SO DO NOT TRY FLASHING THEIR AOKP OR CM9
Sent from my MB865 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Couldn't be more wrong....they both boot just fine and are pretty functional, the problem lies in getting the radio to work.
Ravikirancg said:
Nice post..
Just one thing to inform about your last question's ans.. DROID 3'S ROMS DONT WORK ON OUR PHONE. IT WILL BOOTLOOP. SO DO NOT TRY FLASHING THEIR AOKP OR CM.. without backups and sufficient knowledge and experience atleast.. some changes have to be made in the rom before flashing.. i am trying to find all the files we must replace to get them working on our phone.. and just a FYI for those of you that wanna try.. other than droid 3, bionic is our nearest relative.. so u can edit and try their roms as well.. i did kinda get cm9 of bionic after replacing some required files.. but it bootlooped.. and of course bionic is cdma.. so.. good luck..
Sent from my MB865 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Please I emplore you to do your proper research before making incorrect posts like this. I constantly see posts from those who think they know it all, and post idiotic things like this. Nothing makes me madder than someone who does not know how to use google and the search function.
It takes less than 2 min. to make sure you CYA before posting bad information.
Both CM9 and AOKP boot, but with no radio, as has already been said in several posts now. I have tested both.
P.S. most of us devs in here have been working on this very thing for sometime now, and I have not seen you jump in on any of threads discussing the files or how to port or anything.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using xda premium
jimbridgman said:
Please I emplore you to do your proper research before making incorrect posts like this. I constantly see posts from those who think they know it all, and post idiotic things like this. Nothing makes me madder than someone who does not know how to use google and the search function.
It takes less than 2 min. to make sure you CYA before posting bad information.
Both CM9 and AOKP boot, but with no radio, as has already been said in several posts now. I have tested both.
P.S. most of us devs in here have been working on this very thing for sometime now, and I have not seen you jump in on any of threads discussing the files or how to port or anything.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agreed, They actually run extremely well, but obviously I can't stick with them with no radio.
P.S. this is my new best thought for porting, might take some extra build.prop work too. It did not boot for me, but I think we should be able to get it to. Then it is just a question of whether or not the radio will work. there is way more in build.prop on that than I would think.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1598713
I think it may work because it really adds the cm9 stuff to our own files rather than add our files to it. maybe not the cleanest way, but it might just work.
hankbizzo5 said:
You should also add Why any other leak releases of atrix 2 ICS will not work on att atrix 2..... Sick of will this work on my att..... About to be like yea we all use it lol JK.....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
WOW, did I really forget to add that? that was kind of one of the main points of this post I'll fix it tomorrow (actually today, I guess it is after midnight), but I need some sleep.
lkrasner said:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1598713
I think it may work because it really adds the cm9 stuff to our own files rather than add our files to it. maybe not the cleanest way, but it might just work.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have tried this method along with every idea that popped in my head of things to alter after following this guide. I have a highly modified build prop that AOKP boots with that I replaced with a lot of our build prop but there are still some things missing as no luck yet

JellyBean kernels in development for NS?

I'm fairly new to XDA, so I don't mean to tread on anyone's toes by asking.
Anyone currently developing a JellyBean kernel for Nexus S (or 4G)?
Sent from my Nexus S using xda app-developers app
MercilessLTD said:
I'm fairly new to XDA, so I don't mean to tread on anyone's toes by asking.
Anyone currently developing a JellyBean kernel for Nexus S (or 4G)?
Sent from my Nexus S using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Of course there is. Every Dev who has created a ICS will make a JB. Not sure this is worthy of a thread start. Next week things will start rolling in Kernels and Rom's. Just enjoy JB.
Nothing is coming until we have source. This thread only asks a question that even a little bit of logic would make unnecessary. I don't get why anyone would feel the need to ask it, I mean what's their reasoning? Is every kernel dev is sitting on their hands until someone asks if anyone's working on something?
063_XOBX said:
Nothing is coming until we have source. This thread only asks a question that even a little bit of logic would make unnecessary. I don't get why anyone would feel the need to ask it, I mean what's their reasoning? Is every kernel dev is sitting on their hands until someone asks if anyone's working on something?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
source seems to be there : https://android.googlesource.com/kernel/samsung
branche : android-samsung-3.0-jb
_thalamus said:
So, I tried to build a JB kernel, but it won't boot. It appears that Google have not pushed the correct kernel source for the JB OTA...
The PVR userspace libs and kernel driver is mismatched.
So, I've requested the correct source on the Android Building groups, and will release a test version whenever they decide to push that...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=29051464&postcount=333
jokkir said:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=29051464&postcount=333
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you read thalamus thread, thats been fixed...
Sent from my Nexus S using xda app-developers app
Air kernel weekly version for JB released
Sent from my Nexus S using xda app-developers app

Kyndig's Paranoid Android - SGS4G Q&A

Um..questions shall be asked herrr lol that's right herrr
Re:
For some reason my home button doesn't work with this... any clue why? I've reloaded it three times and it does the same thing. Also it keeps on popping up "Unfortunately, Android keyboard (AOSP) has stopped." Thanks
-JH
NVM, overlooked what wasn't working. Please delete.
Wifi not working
After flashing this ROM my Wifi stopped working.. I could not "ON" my Wifi in Setting. Kindly help.. ? :crying:
sudhakarpsp said:
After flashing this ROM my Wifi stopped working.. I could not "ON" my Wifi in Setting. Kindly help.. ? :crying:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Read the op as it'll key you know all jb rooms have a wifi and data issue and are not meant to be used as daily drivers
Sent from my SCH-I605 using xda premium
ParanoidAndroid has been jacking with their source which has had me going crazy for weeks. I'll keep y'all up to date as best I can.
Sent from a hole in the time/space continuum.
Update Rumor
I was finally able to get the source to download Monday and eventually got it to build yet it doesn't quite work yet since it's 4.2.1 :laugh: so this will probably need to be put on hold until the 4.2.1 kernel is closer to stable.
Thread Ownership Change
I am turning the ParanoidAndroid thread over to my teammate thomas.raines. He has the 4.1.2 source which is no longer available on GitHub. I appreciate everyone's patience with me in the lack of support I have been able to provide for this ROM. Thomas will do an excellent job.
Download
Is the download link in OP, because I cannot find it. Or is is just me? Thanks in advance.
In this OP or in the actual ROM development thead?
yeongjje said:
Is the download link in OP, because I cannot find it. Or is is just me? Thanks in advance.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Download link has been taken down because it was an unstable alpha build. Thomas is most likely working his butt off to fix this ROM. Please be patient until it gets fixed. In the mean time, check out the PACman ROM. It is a mashup of Paranoid, CM and AOKP.
Link to PACman: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2136833
Sent from my Xoom using xda app-developers app
Theraze said:
In this OP or in the actual ROM development thead?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
In the ROM development thread. I couldn't find it there. Any clue?
Edit:
Nevermind I didn't see Cooptx's comment. I thought it was weird how there was not download link. Now it all makes sense. Thank you, guys.
anybody working on pa seems its dead ?
chacua358 said:
anybody working on pa seems its dead ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
When PA pulled the source code from their repository I was dead in the water. I haven't been in contact with anyone from TFQ in over a month so I'm not sure if Mr. Raines has made any progress.
Sent from a hole in the time/space continuum.
Is it possible to just port PA? I know the first answer to that would be for me to try myself, but I don't have access to a good 64 bit computer running Linux and I am not allowed to change our only 64 bit computer to Linux or even touch it considering that it is my dad's. I understand that PACman is a thing, because I have recommend it to others before, but I would like to have just plain PA. Just a thought with a nice long monologue about why I can't attempt it myself. That is unless someone would like to inform me that it is possible to port on a 32 but computer xD
Sent from my Xoom using xda app-developers app
Cooptx said:
Is it possible to just port PA? I know the first answer to that would be for me to try myself, but I don't have access to a good 64 bit computer running Linux and I am not allowed to change our only 64 bit computer to Linux or even touch it considering that it is my dad's. I understand that PACman is a thing, because I have recommend it to others before, but I would like to have just plain PA. Just a thought with a nice long monologue about why I can't attempt it myself. That is unless someone would like to inform me that it is possible to port on a 32 but computer xD
Sent from my Xoom using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you could touch your dad's PC you could at least install VMWare or Oracle Box and run it in a VM. lol.
xD there is a thought. Sadly I dont think that he would appreciate that
Sent from my Xoom using xda app-developers app
You dont need a pc to port well to have it boot lol I booted up an old miui on the sgs4g lol porting like smali hacking not source of course
Sent from my SCH-I545 using xda app-developers app

Categories

Resources