I saw that there were no official benchmark threads here so I thought I'd post my results and everyone can do the same here.
This the procedure I used and the same procedure you should use in order to obtain little deviation from the mean:
Make sure the device is on performance mode
1) clear your recent apps
2) have an app close your background apps (I used Asus own widget that says "one click clean")
3) run your benchmark
These are the scores I got on my stock 4.0.3 tf700:
Sunspider = 1356.9ms
V8 benchmark = 1719
Quadrant = 4407 (cpu=14354 mem=4019 i/o=1225 2d=175 3d=2260)
Antutu = 13443 (cpu=8340 ram=3022 gpu=1405 i/o=676)
Nenamark 1= 58.9fps
Nenamark 2 = 38.3fps
Smartbench and sql I omitted bc the results were way off (2 yr old phones were outperforming our tablet).
I like the Quadrant and Antutu benchmarks bc I think these two give the best results and show the bottleneck in our beloved TF700T (i/o) and the beast that is the tegra3. The i/o of the tf700 if pretty pathetic. My atrix which is 1.5yrs old doubles the tf700 in the i/o department. Despite that downfall the TF700T is still the best and strongest tab on the market.
I'll leave it up to you guys to decide if the 2d in Quadrant makes any sense to u guys. 175 seems pretty bad. Also the gpu seems pretty meek. But I am a novice and I can't decipher Benchmarks like u guys can.
Sent from my ASUS Transformer Pad TF700T using xda premium
gutts10 said:
I saw that there were no official benchmark threads here so I thought I'd post my results and everyone can do the same here.
This the procedure I used and the same procedure you should use in order to obtain little deviation from the mean:
1) clear your recent apps
2) have an app close your background apps (I used Asus own widget that says "one click clean")
3) run your benchmark
These are the scores I got on my stock 4.0.3 tf700:
Sunspider = 1356.9ms
V8 benchmark = 1719
Quadrant = 4407 (cpu=14354 mem=4019 i/o=1225 2d=175 3d=2260)
Antutu = 13443 (cpu=8340 ram=3022 gpu=1405 i/o=676)
Nenamark 1= 58.9fps
Nenamark 2 = 38.3fps
Smartbench and sql I omitted bc the results were way off (2 yr old phones were outperforming our tablet).
I like the Quadrant and Antutu benchmarks bc I think these two give the best results and show the bottleneck in our beloved TF700T (i/o) and the beast that is the tegra3. The i/o of the tf700 if pretty pathetic. My atrix which is 1.5yrs old doubles the tf700 in the i/o department. Despite that downfall the TF700T is still the best and strongest tab on the market.
I'll leave it up to you guys to decide if the 2d in Quadrant makes any sense to u guys. 175 seems pretty bad. Also the gpu seems pretty meek. But I am a novice and I can't decipher Benchmarks like u guys can.
Sent from my ASUS Transformer Pad TF700T using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's actually interesting you got 1300's on Sunspider because many sites were more like 1800 and when I had the device. In fact, Galaxy Note has 1300's and that the one of reason I thought browser speed on the Galaxy Note was faster than the Infinity (though benchmark is just benchmark but it at least showed the # difference of what I experienced, but may be you got really good unit and I had bad units).
I would personally add RL Benchmark and Androbenchmark as those #'s reflected the fact stock I/O on infinity being much slower than other devices, and perhaps explanation of the frequent ANR on infinity vs. Note's 20's RL score without a single ANR (for past 2 & 1/2 weeks). Though given custom rom had fixed RL score on Infinity down to 19, the infinity can definitely get down to the same level but not on current stock.
Look again
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1807909
Related
Title. Did or can anyone run quadrant scores and post it here?
Sent from my Ally using XDA App
Standard = 1944
Hr1 Beta: MoDaCo Custom ROM =3224
Why ppl keep asking for a benchmark from an application that is worthless is beyond me. Just an FYI to everyone who looks at quadrant, it runs on one thread, aka it can only really test 1/2 of the phone, second when running quadrant on any tegra 2 device quadrant wont even max out a SINGLE core % wise. AKA its scores mean nothing...
I know. I was just wondering. I mean they mean something, at that something is something I don't know.
Sent from my Ally using XDA App
jug6ernaut said:
Why ppl keep asking for a benchmark from an application that is worthless is beyond me. Just an FYI to everyone who looks at quadrant, it runs on one thread, aka it can only really test 1/2 of the phone, second when running quadrant on any tegra 2 device quadrant wont even max out a SINGLE core % wise. AKA its scores mean nothing...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yep, even with pcs I quit looking at 3d mark scores when I started noticing that 2000 extra points only gave me 1-3 fps more.
real world testing is far better than some generic benchmark. the archos 101 hits 2900, the evo 4g can reach 2700. but do they actually perform better than a tegra 2 device? well... other than high profile hd playback.
i am running infused 1.3.1 andon quadrant i would score 1500-1750 but on smartbench i would get 915-1015 on cpu and pretty close to 3000 on gpu , i have two questions, are those score from smart bench good and secondly which should i take more seriously quadrant or smart bench
silver258 said:
i am running infused 1.3.1 andon quadrant i would score 1500-1750 but on smartbench i would get 915-1015 on cpu and pretty close to 3000 on gpu , i have two questions, are those score from smart bench good and secondly which should i take more seriously quadrant or smart bench
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
None of it matters... The phone runs good doesn't it? that is all that should matter
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I997 using XDA App
Wtf good is an insult its beyond good i came from iphone 3gs lol
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I997 using XDA App
if you buy the full version of quadrant you get more information, i am totally against the idea of just stacking scores like quadrant does. that being said smart benchmark attempts to make a simple compsite score that is more relevant than the otheres do using some kind of algorithm to balance the weight of each componant, i dont agree with that either.
if you want to benchmark to figure out what you have improved specifically then get antutu or pay for quadrant but never look at the cumulative scores, it is totally irrelevant.
if you want to see how the performance compare acording to an algorithm get smart benchmark
if you want to be impressed with the phone, run a 3d/opengl benchmark. or otherwise play some H.264 codec .mkv videos at 720p (1080p also works but at a lower bitrate and class, the 720 video would likely look better) then try the same video on an atrix and an inspire.
I have Prime v1.6 and Netformer 1.5.
I turned it up to 1.4ghz and i ran the Quadrant benchmark, i got a 2031.
now im looking on some websites and they show they got over 4000?
what's with this? am i getting correct numbers or not?
I got 6123 benchmark, clocked at 1.6ghz
Sent from my Transformer TF101 using Tapatalk
If your TF isn't fully stable at a certain clockspeed then performance of the device may be affected resulting in a lower benchmark result.
A lot of these benchmarks are flawed and can be hacked. I get 35xx at 1.5 GHz on Revolver 1.1.1
To anyone who has their A700, could you please install, run, & post the results from the following benchmark apps?
RL Benchmark :
https://play.google.com/store/apps/...mNvbS5yZWRsaWNlbnNlLmJlbmNobWFyay5zcWxpdGUiXQ..
Androbench :
https://play.google.com/store/apps/...SwxLDEsImNvbS5hbmRyb21lZGEuYW5kcm9iZW5jaDIiXQ..
CPUSpy :
https://play.google.com/store/apps/...251bGwsMSwxLDEsImNvbS5idmFsb3Nlay5jcHVzcHkiXQ..
I'm particulary curious to see I/O results and to compare them against the results of the Asus Infinity.
Thank you!!!
Sorry should have resized those, not used to such a high res screenshot lol
Thank you!! For the curious, I've quoted & included the ASUS Infinity benchmarks. I'm happy to see that they're fairly comparable.
I've been waiting on both Acer & Asus to release their HD tablets, and am happy to see that they're both on par with one another. Might have to go snag the Acer tomorrow!
Screwedupsmitty said:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ASUS Infinity:
nivlheim_o_O? said:
ok... now finally at home it's time for some benchmarks !
CPUSpy infos :
http://bayimg.com/kAPPEAAdd
RL Benchmark :
http://bayimg.com/KapPIAadd
Androbench :
http://bayimg.com/kappJaadd
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Np' glad to help. Good to see we have comparable stats despite the price difference. I'm happy so far although I'm just a few hours in, battery life for the price being my driving factor. Happy to help where I can!
Sent from my A700 using XDA
So, suppose the benchmarks didn't show a good result.
Compare it to the samsung's galaxy s3
There's some latency issues, nvidia tegra 3's 5th Battery Saver Core, essentially single core on its own.
Look at the bench results of sgs3 and compare.
What's so different between these devices that makes the results look odd, eg, camcorder etc,.
My buddy brought over his new shiney Infinity. I used it for a little while and for some reason couldn't really feel a difference in performance over my Prime. I thought when newer tablets are released they would at least perform better, no?
My wish is getting Android to run on the ipad 3.
It is basically the same device with a better screen. You won't see a performance gain until a new generation of chipsets drop and Jelly bean is available. I had some terrible WiFi performance issues that got on my last nerve and the infinity by all reports seems to have fixed those issues. That is why I'm upgrading
Sent from my HTC Sensation using Tapatalk 2
Actually, isn't the Tegra 3 clocked higher in the TF700 (I thought that I read that somewhere)? Plus, it has faster memory, so you *should* see a slight increase in performance. Unless that performance gain is negated by the extra pixels that it needs to push!
Sent from my ASUS Transformer Pad TF700T using Tapatalk 2
jtrosky said:
Actually, isn't the Tegra 3 clocked higher in the TF700 (I thought that I read that somewhere)? Plus, it has faster memory, so you *should* see a slight increase in performance. Unless that performance gain is negated by the extra pixels that it needs to push!
Sent from my ASUS Transformer Pad TF700T using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Currently, there is not much of difference in performance between the Prime and TF700 because there aren't many apps that can take full advantage of the higher resolution screen or the higher clock speed. I have owned Prime, TF300 and now Infinity and for me Infinity is definitely a complete product compared to its previous versions. Or maybe I should say that TF700 is the product that Prime should have been from day one (minus the HD screen off course).
I few GHz isn't going to make that much of a difference in real world performance since the screen is higher res. If you overclock the Prime, you can get the same clock speed as the Infinity fairly easily. Right now, must users are reporting a bottleneck in the I/O performance and is causing issues with the performance of the device. I doubt ASUS will address this issue for ICS and try to have it fixed in the Jelly Bean update. They have had the code longer than any other company and shares similar internals with the Nexus 7.
Sent from my HTC Sensation using Tapatalk 2
to provide some 'un scientific comparisions' ,, I have ASUS , Win PAD (x64) , TF201 (older model) and the newer Infinity Tf700t .....all 32GB models
for me (without any benchmarking ) ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,Tf700 = far far faster and 'cleaner' running in STD MODE ( withupdated firmwares ) to Tf20x models
Plus , I not much of a lover in them silly WA software company ( always been a UNIX geek) ,,,, so am forced to use ASUS windows tablet for work
but am loving the Infnity , with DOCK = max flexability when ROOTED ( not unlocked boot loader)
Hope this helps ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,cheers
legendary1022 said:
It is basically the same device with a better screen. You won't see a performance gain until a new generation of chipsets drop and Jelly bean is available. I had some terrible WiFi performance issues that got on my last nerve and the infinity by all reports seems to have fixed those issues. That is why I'm upgrading
Sent from my HTC Sensation using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wifi performance or lack of is why I'm selling my Prime and purchased an Infinity. Particularly the weak range. I just ran a speed test several times on the Prime and Infinity outside on my deck. The Prime averages about 6mps. The Infinity averages about 25mps. I'm a happy camper now. As someone else in this thread mentioned, this is what the Prime should have been. EBay auction on my Prime ends tomorrow and l have a bidder, good riddance Prime.
Sent from my ASUS Transformer Pad TF700T using xda premium