Sorry if this is a dumb question I'm new to this but why are there two CM10 ROMs in the development forum? There is an "Official" build in the normal threads and an "Unofficial" one pinned at the top. Shouldn't the official one be pinned instead? What's the difference and is one better than the other? I'm just looking for the most stable/functioning JB rom.
Side note, is there a JB MIUI rom foe this phone?
Thanks in advance!
josbor11 said:
Sorry if this is a dumb question I'm new to this but why are there two CM10 ROMs in the development forum? There is an "Official" build in the normal threads and an "Unofficial" one pinned at the top. Shouldn't the official one be pinned instead? What's the difference and is one better than the other? I'm just looking for the most stable/functioning JB rom.
Side note, is there a JB MIUI rom foe this phone?
Thanks in advance!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No MIUI ROM yet. The "Unofficial" version was released before CM released theirs (and on my phone it never rebooted with it on phone calls like the official CM one does). The "Official" is the real deal from Cyanogenmod.
which is more stable? I am receiving my s3 Friday and plan on running cm10 asap.
I haven't had issues with either of them. However, there are things that I like in TW more, so before automatically going to CM10, I would recommend trying out the stock, or stock-like roms first.
tdperry said:
No MIUI ROM yet. The "Unofficial" version was released before CM released theirs (and on my phone it never rebooted with it on phone calls like the official CM one does). The "Official" is the real deal from Cyanogenmod.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Are you inferring that the Unofficial has hot reboots during phone calls?
flipped cracker said:
I haven't had issues with either of them. However, there are things that I like in TW more, so before automatically going to CM10, I would recommend trying out the stock, or stock-like roms first.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I really do enjoy the stock that comes with the phone. I am not a huge fan of bare bones android I like skinned interfaces but I really do enjoy the speed and features that come with JB and Google Now.
I was running CM10 for while without issues, but when I upgraded to the latest nightly, it soft bricked.
Related
Im looking for a complete Stock ICS Rom if its available i used to have the Nexus S Unlocked and i love the complete Stock ICS Look, im wondering is there a Rom with all of that??
Yesterday i was testing the last waffle house build but i got three things i didnt like, first one the usb storage problem, second one for some reason some of the apps wont download at all, and finally the phone re booted on it self.
Any other build out there with the real stock look of ICS??
daworship said:
Im looking for a complete Stock ICS Rom if its available i used to have the Nexus S Unlocked and i love the complete Stock ICS Look, im wondering is there a Rom with all of that??
Yesterday i was testing the last waffle house build but i got three things i didnt like, first one the usb storage problem, second one for some reason some of the apps wont download at all, and finally the phone re booted on it self.
Any other build out there with the real stock look of ICS??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Cm9 and aokp is probably the closest you can get to asop vanilla ics
Sent from my ASUS Transformer Pad TF300T using XDA Premium HD app
Thanks im going to look for them.
Kenneth.Torres said:
Cm9 and aokp is probably the closest you can get to asop vanilla ics
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
nothing is like stock , all else is buggy...op wait for the ics ota
mahanddeem said:
nothing is like stock , all else is buggy...op wait for the ics ota
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's kind of a stupid statement,***mod edited***... The ICS releases that are out now are just like stock AT&T ota ics... Do you think they're going to change the rom completely or give us aosp ota??? The releases that we have are as close to stock as they are gonna get, only thing they're doing now is getting bugs out or adding apps from the carriers that they want... Have you tried all of the ICS roms out there? I've been running seanz ucle2 ics release rom and I've had absolutely no problems... As long as you read/follow the instructions completely everything should be fine... And thinking about this, the skyrocket is from AT&T not from google so we're never going to get stock ICS ota... OTA releases are not gonna be like aosp, aokp or cm9...
No no no I'm not a dev guys OK I ported the rom and the last release I only helped a bit I been busy on a few projects for the skyrocket community lol but to say the hard work and dedication that actual devs have put in is beneath you is a statement that I can not condone and actually is an insult to this site the roms in the dev section are far beyond what anything Samsung will ever do (/rant)
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using Tapatalk 2
Thread Closed due to a nonproductive discussion.
Well since the international hox has jb (not justin beiber) already http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1737736 I'm wondering if anyone is working on getting jb (still not justin bieber) running on the xl?
G4 Man2 said:
Well since the international hox has jb (not justin beiber) already http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1737736 I'm wondering if anyone is working on getting jb (still not justin bieber) running on the xl?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
we need kernel source. After that it will be just a matter of time. The International HOX also shares a chipset with the Nexus 7 so that helps
gunnyman said:
we need kernel source. After that it will be just a matter of time. The International HOX also shares a chipset with the Nexus 7 so that helps
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Any news on getting that kernel source?
I'm assuming that we wont have full AOSP roms until we have that source?
Any news on getting S-OFF?
Man, I really cant stand sense anymore
zoltrix said:
Any news on getting that kernel source?
I'm assuming that we wont have full AOSP roms until we have that source?
Any news on getting S-OFF?
Man, I really cant stand sense anymore
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Go pester HTC and att to release kernel source.
Sent from my HTC One X using xda app-developers app
zoltrix said:
I'm assuming that we wont have full AOSP roms until we have that source?
Any news on getting S-OFF?
(
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Have you tried the CM9 ROM in development or the AOKP ROM over on Rootzwiki? They are both functional enough to be used as a daily driver.
Why do we need S-off? We can already do basically everything through recovery without it. Would it be nice to have, sure I guess, but definitely not needed.
Kernel source will be released. Could be soon, could be September. We don't know when. But it will be released. Once it is available we will have answers.
Sent from my HTC One X using xda app-developers app
pside15 said:
Have you tried the CM9 ROM in development or the AOKP ROM over on Rootzwiki? They are both functional enough to be used as a daily driver.
Why do we need S-off? We can already do basically everything through recovery without it. Would it be nice to have, sure I guess, but definitely not needed.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yea s-off isn't needed, but nice to have.
i've been following the cm9 thread, and it seems great but ive been using my camcorder almost non-stop and i'll miss it for sure
I saw on one of the threads for either MIUI or CM9 but I don't remember which that someone got the camcorder working? I have the file in my download folder on my phone but I haven't tried it yet. I'm just keeping it for if and when I decide to try out MIUI or CM9.
I loaded an unofficial CM9 Alpha 5 ROM on my North American HTC One X and the camera worked, although nowhere near as good as the camera app in the stock HOX software. Camcoder was flaky and crashed periodically. A video I posted on YouTube circa 4:50 has a demo of it: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XPi8a5SvJvQ.
If interested, the build I loaded was the alpha5 in the thread "[ROM][WIP] Unofficial CM9 Port - Alpha 5" http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1688448. Beware of rapid battery drain if you choose to load this alpha5 build I recommend taking 30 minutes and reading through the thread prior to flashing this ROM for details.
Note, however, that this ROM is based off Android 4.0.4 (Ice Cream Sandwich), not 4.1 (Jelly Bean), so this discussion might be a little off topic for this thread
I am running the latest version of ICS. I tried the CM10 rom but found that it was unstable and had a lot of things missing or not working compared to ICS. Anyway, with all the JB Roms popping up in the past few weeks,are there any out there that are better or more stable? I have been waiting for AT&T to release JB for HOC but as usual they are taking forever. Any advice is greatly appreciated!
XHaGGeNx said:
I am running the latest version of ICS. I tried the CM10 rom but found that it was unstable and had a lot of things missing or not working compared to ICS. Anyway, with all the JB Roms popping up in the past few weeks,are there any out there that are better or more stable? I have been waiting for AT&T to release JB for HOC but as usual they are taking forever. Any advice is greatly appreciated!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Viper3.1 and it doesn't get much better than that. It's my opinion though. I would also suggest CM10.1. I loved it but I personally got an odd glitch where my screen would go black but the phone was still on, as were the capacitive buttons.
Anyone here is going to give you opinions. It's truly up to you to pick. The 2 I listed are great ROMS, stable and have awesome developers who stay on top of things.
Sent from my HTC One XL using Tapatalk 2
XHaGGeNx said:
I have been waiting for AT&T to release JB for HOC but as usual they are taking forever.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't expect the AT&T version of JB to be substantially different (probably just more bloat and annoying AT&T branding all over the ROM, really) than any of the stock rooted Sense JB ROMs in Development, or custom ROMs based on those build. So flash one of those and be done with it.
In my opinion you're not going to find anything coming from AT&T as far as JB that's going to be better than the ROMS in development. If anything they are far better. Download a bunch, try them out and stick with the one you like best.
King Kang is super stable for me. Everything works.
King Kang has been the most stable I've tried. Pretty much every rom I've seen on here is livable though. I'm on CM10.1 now and I haven't had any real problems.
Sent from my One X using xda app-developers app
As the title says. I'm looking for a kernel that allows overclocking. I've been looking for a long time but I can't find any. SiyahKernel appears to only work with the i9300 and 4.1. Unless I'm wrong. Thanks.
Also, is CM 10.0 android 4.1? Because im cool with switching to that if it will work with Siyah.
uromastix87 said:
As the title says. I'm looking for a kernel that allows overclocking. I've been looking for a long time but I can't find any. SiyahKernel appears to only work with the i9300 and 4.1. Unless I'm wrong. Thanks.
Also, is CM 10.0 android 4.1? Because im cool with switching to that if it will work with Siyah.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Anything you intend to flash is in the Verizon Galaxy SIII Dev or Original Dev section. Do not flash anything labeled for any other GSIII model, you'll brick your phone. I'm certain each custom kernel allows for OCing, you can find most in the Verizon Original Dev section.
CM10 is 4.1. You need to flash CM10.1 which is 4.2.2 because 4.2.2 is under active development. Something to note, flash kernels released either AFTER the date of your rom/nightly OR within a week or two week span. Often enough, there are updates in the rom source that render kernels prior to the rom's release incompatible. You'll know it's incompatible cuz after flashing your screen will be completely black when booting into the rom.
Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk 4 Beta
SlimSnoopOS said:
Anything you intend to flash is in the Verizon Galaxy SIII Dev or Original Dev section. Do not flash anything labeled for any other GSIII model, you'll brick your phone. I'm certain each custom kernel allows for OCing, you can find most in the Verizon Original Dev section.
CM10 is 4.1. You need to flash CM10.1 which is 4.2.2 because 4.2.2 is under active development. Something to note, flash kernels released either AFTER the date of your rom/nightly OR within a week or two week span. Often enough, there are updates in the rom source that render kernels prior to the rom's release incompatible. You'll know it's incompatible cuz after flashing your screen will be completely black when booting into the rom.
Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk 4 Beta
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for the reply.
So, even if the rom was intended for an i9300 it will work on my 535? Are there any kernels for 4.2.2 that allow OCing?
Will this work with my setup? http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2226894
Hi there mates,
I finally decided to dump the stock ROM and give it a try on custom one.
After reading a bit i think i'm starting to like Cyanogen, but since i want a good stable ROM i appreciated some opinions form anyone who is using it.
1st and really important: my stock ROM does not have any of the know issues (deep sleep probs, random reboots, battery drains etc...) so anyone know if CM 9.x stable have any of this issues?
2nd does everything work? In the CM forums i found no one complaining with "loosing" functionality's but i would like to ear from anyone that uses this on a daily basis. (i found a lot of people complaining with encryption problem and bad flashing but not about Wifi radio, camera, etc...)
3rd: Is this the best choice to use on a daily basis? Or there is a better/more stable/more fluid Rom?
Thanks to all.
Most of the CM 10.x ROMs are pretty stable and usable. I am a fan of the KatKiss ROMs. 4.2.2 has the best functionality, but the 4.3 variant is not bad. The only thng that does not work for me is camera on Skype.
+1 for KatKiss #226
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2362764
frederuco said:
Most of the CM 10.x ROMs are pretty stable and usable. I am a fan of the KatKiss ROMs. 4.2.2 has the best functionality, but the 4.3 variant is not bad. The only thng that does not work for me is camera on Skype.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thks for the info but now im confused...
You mentioned that Skype cant use the front cam. Is that on CM stable roms or the KatKiss ones? Im asking because i use skype a lot and that is an issue to me. :/
Sent from my Transformer TF101
Exnor said:
Thks for the info but now im confused...
You mentioned that Skype cant use the front cam. Is that on CM stable roms or the KatKiss ones? Im asking because i use skype a lot and that is an issue to me. :/
Sent from my Transformer TF101
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
On KatKiss 4.3 the camera do t work for me. The CM 10 and 10.1 ROMs and KatKiss 4.2.2 it worked fine. I have not tried any CM 10.2 ROMs.
frederuco said:
On KatKiss 4.3 the camera do t work for me. The CM 10 and 10.1 ROMs and KatKiss 4.2.2 it worked fine. I have not tried any CM 10.2 ROMs.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Have you tried the stable version recommended on the CM site? Its 9.1.
The 10.x versions are not marked as stable... and i really dont want to re-re-reflash over and over again
Thks
Sent from my Transformer TF101
Exnor said:
Have you tried the stable version recommended on the CM site? Its 9.1.
The 10.x versions are not marked as stable... and i really dont want to re-re-reflash over and over again
Thks
Sent from my Transformer TF101
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hmmm, if I did it was a while ago. CM 9 is based on ICS. I have not run an ICS ROM for more than a few hours in over a year. I would say that the Jelly Bean based ROMs (CM10.X) feel SO much faster due to project butter. I flashed back to stock ICS a bit ago, and it feels so sluggish.
Most of the threads on CM 10 you can see how stable they are. I know the No-Name CM 10.1 is rock solid. Joesteink has moved on, but the ROM is still rock solid and many users swear by it.
frederuco said:
Hmmm, if I did it was a while ago. CM 9 is based on ICS. I have not run an ICS ROM for more than a few hours in over a year. I would say that the Jelly Bean based ROMs (CM10.X) feel SO much faster due to project butter. I flashed back to stock ICS a bit ago, and it feels so sluggish.
Most of the threads on CM 10 you can see how stable they are. I know the No-Name CM 10.1 is rock solid. Joesteink has moved on, but the ROM is still rock solid and many users swear by it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I cant find the links for that version... only the linaro versions...
Sent from my Transformer TF101
Here is the link to the downloads: http://nexfiles.kjonigsen.net/tf101/cm10.2/
And the thread: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2402752
frederuco said:
Here is the link to the downloads: http://nexfiles.kjonigsen.net/tf101/cm10.2/
And the thread: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2402752
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks mate... i'm gonna give it a try and post my results here in case is useful for other people.
Exnor said:
Thanks mate... i'm gonna give it a try and post my results here in case is useful for other people.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Is CM finally stable? I had it installed a year or so ago, but then it was still beta for the transformer. Since then I used various flavors and eventually stayed with the EOS-build. Very stable with all the options I ever need (like overclocking and gouvenor-changing). I'm still using EOS, since it's stable and performing very well. Katkiss seems to be the continuation of it, so you could try it yourself And if you don't like it, then you drop it for something else