Skyrocket may be affected with the brick bug? - AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727

http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1621679
In this thread, OP states that his rom, and some others may be affected with the brickbug. I'm running Sky ICS, its a fairly recent version (from a few weeks ago)
I'm worried that my phone may be affected (I have the Rogers i727r). Can anyone confirm that my phone is in danger of dying on me? And if so, how can I avoid this.
I used Chainfires app and it said that my emmc chip is probably affected, but I'm reading that bricking occurs based on the the kernel I'm running
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1653022 (ROM I'm running)
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1693704 (Chainfires App)

No

So I'm safe?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using XDA

Yup

thatguy97 said:
So I'm safe?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Did you read the threads you linked to? Or this one?
This post has some info.
It seems that the Skyrocket does have this problem, but the circumstances have to be perfect for it to occur.
Since the kernel source code for the ICS leaks for the Skyrocket is not available there is no way to know if the kernel is safe, from my understanding of the issue.
Reference post 1
Reference post 2
Your question and further discussion would be more appropriate in one of the already existing threads about this. Starting new threads on the same topic just fragments the discussion.

marvin02 said:
Did you read the threads you linked to? Or this one?
This post has some info.
It seems that the Skyrocket does have this problem, but the circumstances have to be perfect for it to occur.
Since the kernel source code for the ICS leaks for the Skyrocket is not available there is no way to know if the kernel is safe, from my understanding of the issue.
Reference post 1
Reference post 2
Your question and further discussion would be more appropriate in one of the already existing threads about this. Starting new threads on the same topic just fragments the discussion.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think you are being hard on OP for no reason. This is a serious issue and I was very concerned. I have read the linked posts and additionally I did some research and here is what I get that applies to me
SGS2 Skyrocket IS impacted
[Edit] All SGS2 SkyRocket recoveries - including one I use Touch recovery to install ROM) are GB based. Source this post
My Kernel is NOT impacted since it is GB(I am on MHX superlite 3.1 GB rom)
.

cnewsgrp said:
I think you are being hard on OP for no reason. This is a serious issue and I am very concerned.
I have read the linked posts and here is what I get
SGS2 Skyrocket IS impacted
I have no idea what recovery I use (I know I use Touch recovery to install ROM) so I don't know if condition#2 is met
I have no idea if my Kernel is impacted (I am on MHX superlite 3.1 GB rom)
It would be a great help if some SGS2 Dev explained how it impacts SGS wrt its recovery and kernels. Which are safe and which are not.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Its an issue with the ICS leaks. You're on GB.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using Tapatalk 2

plwalsh88 said:
Its an issue with the ICS leaks. You're on GB.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes Thanks. Additionally most recoveries used except maybe Cyanogenmod ICS recoveries are GB based. So we are safe.

Thank you all for your explanation and help. I can rest easy knowing that I'm pretty much safe
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using XDA

cnewsgrp said:
I think you are being hard on OP for no reason.. . . .
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If not reading and searching are no reason then you are correct.
It is important that each user evaluate their own risk and they can only do that by reading the discussions and processing the information in them.

Yes. The i727 with hardware revision 0x12 could hardbrick with an mmc erase if the emmc chip is faulty. The portal has a full story about it, and Samsung appears to be working on a solution. I have been on several ICS roms now, including the oneclick version of the first leak, and have never had a single issue. Running Sky Ice as well, and it is very safe. I would stick to it, at least till Samsung releases the fix. No harm in being cautious till it is solved.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using xda premium

Agreed. risks are taken even with flashing. You can never know at this point.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using xda premium

Related

[INFO] Why we don't have ICS yet + more info about it

Hi, I have noticed a ton of people curious about why AT&T people do not have ICS yet, so I thought I would answer that once and for all. I admit that I and others have gotten a little mad whenever people ask about this, but it seems they are not able to really find a clear answer, so here it is.
If you feel like this is well done, please sticky it at least until we get it all figured out.
I figure this would be best said i a Q and A type form.
Q: What is ICS, and why does everyone want it so bad?
ICS or "Ice Cream Sandwich" is android version 4.0.x. the next version, 4.1 Jellybean was just released as a slightly less important update, but ICS brought huge changes from Ginger Bread (2.3.x) the previous phone version (3.x HoneyComb was tablet only). ICS brings a slicker, darker, and better looking user interface, as well as many performance enhancements. Most of us want it more because it seems like we should than because it is actually that much better. That said it is still a great update, and most people will be happy to see it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Q: Why is it so hard to get ICS for our phone, while others have it even though it is not officially out?
The main reason is our locked bootloader. That means it is not possible to flash or boot a custom kernel unless it is signed with Motorola's key. That is obviously impossible.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Q: What is a kernel?
the kernel is a major part of any operating system. you can think of it as a sort of layer between hardware and software. It is the part of an OS that communicates directly with a device's hardware. Android is based off the open source Linux kernel, meaning it is free for anybody to build and modify. However, Motorola has only released the source for the ME865, and partially for the MB865, meaning we can't really build a kernel anyways. Then of course, even if we could build one, we wouldn't be able to boot it with our locked bootloader.
ICS is not really complete without the newer kernel that goes with it
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What is Kexec, and is there any way to unlock the bootloader
The fact that I grouped these together would probably lead you to correctly believe they are related. Lets start with the second half. Simply put, NO. I hate to say it, but there is very little hope of EVER unlocking our bootloader, unless Motorola decides to do something like HTC did and allow unlocking.
Kexec is a method of hot switching kernels while still booted. It is actually just a linux tool that you can use on a computer, but it has been built for android essentially allowing you to bypass the bootloader. Theoretically it would be an easy way to run custom kernels. Then why don't we? Well a few reasons. One, we can't really get one built to begin with, especially because, at least to my knowledge, jimbridgman is the only one who actually knows what he is doing with kernel building, and he is only half here now that he got his fany new SGS3. Two, it does not work great. I am not sure the latest version is working at all on our phone, and even if it did, only one processor comes up, meaning it is really slow.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Q: What's the deal with these Droid 3 builds that supposedly boot?
Some people managed to build ICS for the droid 3 based of a 2.3.6 kernel. that means you can boot it on a stock GB kernel, and therefore you do not need to unlock the bootloader. Unfortunately that means it is not totally ICS, but it is still pretty good. Of course they are for a cdma phone, so that means no data, no calls, and no gps, making it kind of useless.
I am not going to give a link to them, but if you are really interested go search around. any of the Droid 3 AOKP and CM9 builds will boot just fine. Find more info in the dev section, but please don't start a thread asking about it.
We have been trying to port these to work for us, but that is proving more difficult than expected, and with ICS just around the corner, I don't want to put time into it. I do think it is possible, and if you are a dev looking to give it a shot, PM me and I will tell you all I know, and try to help out as much as I can.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Great thread!
Thanks for putting this together!
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using xda premium
jimbridgman said:
Great thread!
Thanks for putting this together!
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thanks. I felt it was needed. let me know if I forgot to say something important.
Sent from my MB865 using xda premium
Perhaps this will hopefully curb some of the incessant "where's my ice cream sandwich" or "make me a rom based on ICS" threads here. Nice job, and as always, your work here is both highly appreciated and revered.
Sent from my MB865 using xda premium
Nice work kras, as always.
Sent from my MB865 using xda premium
Hell i thought this thread was going to give me info on why att hadn't released ics for us yet. Just kidding, good job. If this thread falls down the list ill bump it so maybe it will help some of the new people and we won't get any more new threads about ics.
Sent from my MB865 using xda premium
Apex_Strider said:
Perhaps this will hopefully curb some of the incessant "where's my ice cream sandwich" or "make me a rom based on ICS" threads here. Nice job, and as always, your work here is both highly appreciated and revered.
Sent from my MB865 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No,Most likely once posts stop on this thread and it makes it to the second page we will see more questions im sure lol
Sent from my MB865 using xda premium
rdavisct said:
No,Most likely once posts stop on this thread and it makes it to the second page we will see more questions im sure lol
Sent from my MB865 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
that's why I asked for sticky
Sent from my MB865 using xda premium
The good news is that the "3rd quarter" is tomorrow! Which knowing motorola and AT&T, could mean whatever.
Take that with a grain of salt. Lol.
Sent from my MB865 using xda premium
Fall of Enosis said:
The good news is that the "3rd quarter" is tomorrow! Which knowing motorola and AT&T, could mean whatever.
Take that with a grain of salt. Lol.
Sent from my MB865 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
so is September
Sent from my MB865 using xda premium
Why don't we have a vanilla rom? Is it due again to the locked bootloader?
Sent from my MB865
gvsukids said:
Why don't we have a vanilla rom? Is it due again to the locked bootloader?
Sent from my MB865
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yep. same thing. we have a hard time compiling any also source as you need a custom kernel
Sent from my MB865 using xda premium
Nice post..
Just one thing to inform about your last question's ans.. DROID 3'S ROMS DONT WORK ON OUR PHONE. IT WILL BOOTLOOP. SO DO NOT TRY FLASHING THEIR AOKP OR CM.. without backups and sufficient knowledge and experience atleast.. some changes have to be made in the rom before flashing.. i am trying to find all the files we must replace to get them working on our phone.. and just a FYI for those of you that wanna try.. other than droid 3, bionic is our nearest relative.. so u can edit and try their roms as well.. i did kinda get cm9 of bionic after replacing some required files.. but it bootlooped.. and of course bionic is cdma.. so.. good luck..
Sent from my MB865 using Tapatalk 2
Ravikirancg said:
Nice post..
Just one thing to inform about your last question's ans.. DROID 3'S ROMS DONT WORK ON OUR PHONE. IT WILL BOOTLOOP. SO DO NOT TRY FLASHING THEIR AOKP OR CM.. without backups and sufficient knowledge and experience atleast.. some changes have to be made in the rom before flashing.. i am trying to find all the files we must replace to get them working on our phone.. and just a FYI for those of you that wanna try.. other than droid 3, bionic is our nearest relative.. so u can edit and try their roms as well.. i did kinda get cm9 of bionic after replacing some required files.. but it bootlooped.. and of course bionic is cdma.. so.. good luck..
Sent from my MB865 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You are not right. I can prove it. The latest droid 3 AOKP and Cm9 builds will boot just fine, with no radio
You should also add Why any other leak releases of atrix 2 ICS will not work on att atrix 2..... Sick of will this work on my att..... About to be like yea we all use it lol JK.....
Ravikirancg said:
DROID 3'S ROMS DONT WORK ON OUR PHONE. IT WILL BOOTLOOP. SO DO NOT TRY FLASHING THEIR AOKP OR CM9
Sent from my MB865 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Couldn't be more wrong....they both boot just fine and are pretty functional, the problem lies in getting the radio to work.
Ravikirancg said:
Nice post..
Just one thing to inform about your last question's ans.. DROID 3'S ROMS DONT WORK ON OUR PHONE. IT WILL BOOTLOOP. SO DO NOT TRY FLASHING THEIR AOKP OR CM.. without backups and sufficient knowledge and experience atleast.. some changes have to be made in the rom before flashing.. i am trying to find all the files we must replace to get them working on our phone.. and just a FYI for those of you that wanna try.. other than droid 3, bionic is our nearest relative.. so u can edit and try their roms as well.. i did kinda get cm9 of bionic after replacing some required files.. but it bootlooped.. and of course bionic is cdma.. so.. good luck..
Sent from my MB865 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Please I emplore you to do your proper research before making incorrect posts like this. I constantly see posts from those who think they know it all, and post idiotic things like this. Nothing makes me madder than someone who does not know how to use google and the search function.
It takes less than 2 min. to make sure you CYA before posting bad information.
Both CM9 and AOKP boot, but with no radio, as has already been said in several posts now. I have tested both.
P.S. most of us devs in here have been working on this very thing for sometime now, and I have not seen you jump in on any of threads discussing the files or how to port or anything.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using xda premium
jimbridgman said:
Please I emplore you to do your proper research before making incorrect posts like this. I constantly see posts from those who think they know it all, and post idiotic things like this. Nothing makes me madder than someone who does not know how to use google and the search function.
It takes less than 2 min. to make sure you CYA before posting bad information.
Both CM9 and AOKP boot, but with no radio, as has already been said in several posts now. I have tested both.
P.S. most of us devs in here have been working on this very thing for sometime now, and I have not seen you jump in on any of threads discussing the files or how to port or anything.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agreed, They actually run extremely well, but obviously I can't stick with them with no radio.
P.S. this is my new best thought for porting, might take some extra build.prop work too. It did not boot for me, but I think we should be able to get it to. Then it is just a question of whether or not the radio will work. there is way more in build.prop on that than I would think.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1598713
I think it may work because it really adds the cm9 stuff to our own files rather than add our files to it. maybe not the cleanest way, but it might just work.
hankbizzo5 said:
You should also add Why any other leak releases of atrix 2 ICS will not work on att atrix 2..... Sick of will this work on my att..... About to be like yea we all use it lol JK.....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
WOW, did I really forget to add that? that was kind of one of the main points of this post I'll fix it tomorrow (actually today, I guess it is after midnight), but I need some sleep.
lkrasner said:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1598713
I think it may work because it really adds the cm9 stuff to our own files rather than add our files to it. maybe not the cleanest way, but it might just work.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have tried this method along with every idea that popped in my head of things to alter after following this guide. I have a highly modified build prop that AOKP boots with that I replaced with a lot of our build prop but there are still some things missing as no luck yet

The brick bug Stock ICS

Does the new ICS for the att version of the skyrocket have a safe kernal or is it still at risk of having the emmc corrupted?
Update: it seems the brick bug is in the stock ics 4.0.4 , use caution when wiping back to factory. Entropy512 has informed me that the att rom has the mmc_cap_erase command in a host file where rogers does not. I will update as soon as more info becomes available to me.
Wipe internal in the rom and let us know
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using Tapatalk 2
Intub8 said:
Does the new ICS for the att version of the skyrocket have a safe kernal or is it still at risk of having the emmc corrupted?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
you gotta read more
Illnevertell said:
Wipe internal in the rom and let us know
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol no thanks.
vincom said:
you gotta read more
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The answer is not in your sig. It may not be possible to tell until the source drops but maybe a dev has some insight.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using xda premium
Now that ics source has been released can anyone confirm the brick bug in Samsung's kernels have been fixed
Sent from my Skyrocket i727 running Sky ICS
PS: If I was able to help you then hit thanks
Mike on XDA said:
Now that ics source has been released can anyone confirm the brick bug in Samsung's kernels have been fixed
Sent from my Skyrocket i727 running Sky ICS
PS: If I was able to help you then hit thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
.....I can say that just today I went from rooted/rom/kernal to gingerbread stock, kies ICS upgrade (ran for awhile/made nandroid), reflashed to custom everything again and recovered all apps in 1.5hrs. No probs so far. Have to say that samsung/kies did spend about 20+ minutes on the phone. Even rebooted once during...
wantowan2 said:
.....I can say that just today I went from rooted/rom/kernal to gingerbread stock, kies ICS upgrade (ran for awhile/made nandroid), reflashed to custom everything again and recovered all apps in 1.5hrs. No probs so far. Have to say that samsung/kies did spend about 20+ minutes on the phone. Even rebooted once during...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not to be rude, but how does this apply to my question?
Sent from my Skyrocket i727 running Sky ICS
PS: If I was able to help you then hit thanks
Lmfao...
Samsung Galaxy s2 Nuclear Rocket - Embryo 3.2 [UCLE2 BASE]
iPhone 4S - Gave it away, not cool enough
iPhone 3GS - Went for a Swim
Dog - Custom Rom [Golden Retriever] [BEAR2 BASE]
Mike on XDA said:
Not to be rude, but how does this apply to my question?
Sent from my Skyrocket i727 running Sky ICS
PS: If I was able to help you then hit thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I guess the kies upgrade to ICS. The question was posed somewhere wondering if samsung has fixed there OS. I'm saying that I didn't get it from this site but as up to date as possible. just say'n I guess I didn't mention that I have the supposed domed chip and that I haven't ever had issues
wantowan2 said:
I guess the kies upgrade to ICS. The question was posed somewhere wondering if samsung has fixed there OS. I'm saying that I didn't get it from this site but as up to date as possible. just say'n
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wtf
Glad to hear u upgraded to ics without issue but this really doesn't apply to my question whatsoever. Your post was very confusing to top it all off
Sent from my Skyrocket i727 running Sky ICS
PS: If I was able to help you then hit thanks
Mike on XDA said:
Wtf
Glad to hear u upgraded to ics without issue but this really doesn't apply to my question whatsoever. Your post was very confusing to top it all off
Sent from my Skyrocket i727 running Sky ICS
PS: If I was able to help you then hit thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Was a little random. But I was in a car at the time. All I was trying to get across is that I couldn't have done that process with this brickbug being a prob.
wantowan2 said:
Was a little random. But I was in a car at the time. All I was trying to get across is that I couldn't have done that process with this brickbug being a prob.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You are incorrect as from what I understood from your original post you were on a rooted gb rom and flashed back to stock in order to update via kies. 1st off, gb kernels aren't an issue and 2nd, Odin is a safe work around the brick bug issue.
No where in here do u say that u went into the settings on ics and performed a factory reset. That will be the true test
Edit: I revisited your post and see youbdidnt specify gb vs ics but even if u were on ics and went back to stock this wouldn't be a problem through Odin
Sent from my Skyrocket i727 running Sky ICS
PS: If I was able to help you then hit thanks
Mike on XDA said:
You are incorrect as from what I understood from your original post you were on a rooted gb rom and flashed back to stock in order to update via kies. 1st off, gb kernels aren't an issue and 2nd, Odin is a safe work around the brick bug issue.
No where in here do u say that u went into the settings on ics and performed a factory reset. That will be the true test
Sent from my Skyrocket i727 running Sky ICS
PS: If I was able to help you then hit thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nope. I was on Embryo 4.1-->GB(no root)-->then kies upgrade to ICS-->then flashed recovery--> then back to Embryo 4.1......
....for what it's worth. No offense dude.
wantowan2 said:
Nope. I was on Embryo 4.1-->GB(no root)-->then kies upgrade to ICS-->then flashed recovery--> then back to Embryo 4.1......
....for what it's worth. No offense dude.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
??? What do u mean no offense?
I didn't read anything offensive. I was just trying to wrap my head around what u were talking about. I understand now. As I stated in my previous post though the gb kernels were not affected.
To anyone in "the know", I assume brick bug had been addressed and the kernels fixed but can anyone actually CONFIRM this? Thanks
Sent from my Skyrocket i727 running Sky ICS
PS: If I was able to help you then hit thanks
Mike on XDA said:
??? What do u mean no offense?
I didn't read anything offensive. I was just trying to wrap my head around what u were talking about. I understand now. As I stated in my previous post though the gb kernels were not affected.
To anyone in "the know", I assume brick bug had been addressed and the kernels fixed but can anyone actually CONFIRM this? Thanks
Sent from my Skyrocket i727 running Sky ICS
PS: If I was able to help you then hit thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I will ask entropy512 to rip the source apart when he has time. He was the one to discover it originally.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using xda premium
Intub8 said:
I will ask entropy512 to rip the source apart when he has time. He was the one to discover it originally.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Good to hear. Thanks!
Sent from my Skyrocket i727 running Sky ICS
PS: If I was able to help you then hit thanks
For a one stop shop here is Vincom's thread http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1652398
this a quote from this post http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=28731347&postcount=27
Originally Posted by mohan_kr
"First of all there are two aspects to the brick bug (apart from the app., that it just *reports* the suspect f/w):
1) The latest touch recovery (5.5.0.4) 4.3 I believe has been moved to ICS with the EMMC erase capability disabled. I don't know about others, since I don't use it..do the research..
2) Executing erase functions from the running kernel, e.g. the stock firmware that is what this zip has..if you look at the sources and *if* the kernel was built with that source, it is safe there too..standard disclaimer applies..since i am assuming it is built with the recently released code.
In general, the brick bug was specific to I believe certain leaks not on our device. And, if you are flashing a custom rom/kernel they all have a big disclaimer, that you can brick your device in many other ways. If you are so afraid, then you should *not* be flashing custom roms, since pretty much every custom rom/kernel will have that disclaimer..
-----
And as for the erasing photos and all. Flashing does *NOT* delete the contents of the internal or external sdcard (except for platform specific data). It will delete /system /data and /cache, read the pinned threads here on what that means (as the install instructions says, you will have to do that step anyways and make a nandroid backup).."
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
i'll leave it to you guys to decide what this means
vincom said:
this a quote from this post http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=28731347&postcount=27
Originally Posted by mohan_kr
"First of all there are two aspects to the brick bug (apart from the app., that it just *reports* the suspect f/w):
1) The latest touch recovery (5.5.0.4) 4.3 I believe has been moved to ICS with the EMMC erase capability disabled. I don't know about others, since I don't use it..do the research..
2) Executing erase functions from the running kernel, e.g. the stock firmware that is what this zip has..if you look at the sources and *if* the kernel was built with that source, it is safe there too..standard disclaimer applies..since i am assuming it is built with the recently released code.
In general, the brick bug was specific to I believe certain leaks not on our device. And, if you are flashing a custom rom/kernel they all have a big disclaimer, that you can brick your device in many other ways. If you are so afraid, then you should *not* be flashing custom roms, since pretty much every custom rom/kernel will have that disclaimer..
-----
And as for the erasing photos and all. Flashing does *NOT* delete the contents of the internal or external sdcard (except for platform specific data). It will delete /system /data and /cache, read the pinned threads here on what that means (as the install instructions says, you will have to do that step anyways and make a nandroid backup).."
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
i'll leave it to you guys to decide what this means
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks vin.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using xda premium
Do a grep for MMC_CAP_ERASE in drivers/mmc/host - Give me a list of each file it appears in.
Entropy512 said:
Do a grep for MMC_CAP_ERASE in drivers/mmc/host - Give me a list of each file it appears in.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do I need to be rooted to do that entropy.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using xda premium

[Rom] [Stock] Vzw Rooted, Deodexed, Zipaligned

Full Stock - Rooted - Deodexed - Zipaligned
im making a stock rom with a bunch removed and added Functions but i figured id also upload a stock rom deodexed and zipaligned so people can have there fun with theming etc. while we wait to get aosp
this is made with the fixed rooted system.img from http://forum.xda-dev...d.php?t=1762204
and is completely fully stock with root and deodexed/zipaligned
Download:
goo.im: http://goo.im/devs/BeansTown106/SGS3vzw/i535-DeoZipA-stock-rom.zip
torrent: plz make one and i will put in op
i will update this when i fix the 2 apks, right now everything works 100% with the exception of backup assistant
Bugs:
-SecMMS.apk was bugging out when deodex and zipaligned so i removed it and added cm9 mms(messaging)
-vmmhux.apk could not be deodexed so i removed it (part of vzw Bloat)
additional download for the removed apks untouched both will have the odex and apk, incase someone can fix them
here: http://goo.im/devs/BeansTown106/SGS3vzw/stockodexedfiles.zip
sounds interesting, thanks for the work! will check it out when i get a chance
gonna need this will grab it tonight!
Just friendly reminder, as you have posted this in Verizon Galaxy S III Original Android Development, in sense you are right that it is dev work for Verizon but what we are trying to do is separate out AOSP/Source builded roms from Stock roms. So as this is stock rom it will belong in regular dev section rather than original one.
I hope u understand this. Not trying to be mean or disrespect but just trying to explain what's the deal here. Thank You
appdroid said:
Just friendly reminder, as you have posted this in Verizon Galaxy S III Original Android Development, in sense you are right that it is dev work for Verizon but what we are trying to do is separate out AOSP/Source builded roms from Stock roms. So as this is stock rom it will belong in regular dev section rather than original one.
I hope u understand this. Not trying to be mean or disrespect but just trying to explain what's the deal here. Thank You
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What the hell are you talking about? There is only 1 Verizon development section
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda premium
neh4pres said:
What the hell are you talking about? There is only 1 Verizon development section
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Try again...
http://forum.xda-developers.com/forumdisplay.php?f=1692
and
http://forum.xda-developers.com/forumdisplay.php?f=1672
very strange, I was wondering where the kexec thread went to. Still this new section does not show in my xda app
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda premium
OP, Can you make a stripped version of this and remove all of the bloat?
WhammyDroid said:
OP, Can you make a stripped version of this and remove all of the bloat?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1768209
appdroid said:
Just friendly reminder, as you have posted this in Verizon Galaxy S III Original Android Development, in sense you are right that it is dev work for Verizon but what we are trying to do is separate out AOSP/Source builded roms from Stock roms. So as this is stock rom it will belong in regular dev section rather than original one.
I hope u understand this. Not trying to be mean or disrespect but just trying to explain what's the deal here. Thank You
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wtf is the point of original s3 development ans the non original. Honestly its all dev. Is the non original for the dev edition coming out? Its pointless to have 2 threads for aosp and stock.. its still the same phone. Honestly there ahould be a "dev edition" vzw thread if that phone proves to be different and not help this one. People already have a ***** of a time not searching and this will add more confusion.
Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk 2
the organization of the sgs3 threads is horrible.... not easy since verizon's phone is pretty different, and the fact that theres a dozen sections. I almost want to suggest different sections for carriers but not sure that would be an improvement... tough decision really.
anyways back on topic...
Does this cause "Status" to be "Modified"? I think not since its a signed stock image. but had to ask.ty
tillithz said:
the organization of the sgs3 threads is horrible.... not easy since verizon's phone is pretty different, and the fact that theres a dozen sections. I almost want to suggest different sections for carriers but not sure that would be an improvement... tough decision really.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have to agree. The SGS3 forum seems fragmented enough with four carriers in development, but there is genuine need for four carriers in development because there are four different radios. Having both a regular and diet development for each carrier is fragmenting things even more. I know I would rather check threads in four fora than eight.
If one really wanted to separate original development from non-original, a simple [ORIGINAL] tag should do it just fine. But in reality, regardless of how you separate the two, there will always be folks wondering why they can't get [ORIGINAL] by kanging someone else's ROM.
CWR flash?
If you take secmms.apk and the odex for it and out it back in /system/app would it work?
Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk 2
beanstown106 said:
this is made with the fixed rooted system.img from http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1762204
and is completely fully stock with root and deodexed/zipaligned
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Fixed.
Excuse my dumbness, what do u mean by deodexed and zipaligned?
Sent from my Inspire 4G using xda premium.
Just to be clear....
Can this be flashed without a factory reset?
Will wiping cache and dalvik be sufficient?
Brenardo said:
Just to be clear....
Can this be flashed without a factory reset?
Will wiping cache and dalvik be sufficient?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yes.
This breakes the keyboard and probably other stuff...
Great attempt but not "complete" as necessary things dont work properly. ty though
neh4pres said:
very strange, I was wondering where the kexec thread went to. Still this new section does not show in my xda app
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It only shows up on the desktop version. I was Surprised to see two threads yesterday.
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda premium
anyone else having an issue viewing pictures from the MMS feature? I am getting a "load failed" error.

i hate jellybean

i dont know why i ever upgraded to jellybean its horrible my tab has about 20 freezes a day i would do anything to have aokp again on ics so many incompatibilities with apps
its ridiculous how can asus release this total broken crap i think its appauling a company can lock out a device to thier liking i mean can u imagine buying a pc
and trying out windows 7 you couldnt go back to xp or put linux on it i bought my device i should be able to choose what i want on it
I hate people who post in the wrong forum
Sent from my Transformer Pad TF300T using xda premium
I hate people who can't ****3n read forum rules!
Sent from my ASUS Transformer Pad TF300T using Tapatalk 2
I had issues with force closes and reboots after using their OTA Update to Jelly Bean from ICS.
I did a data reset and full wipe and installed JB from scratch, lost root however it is super stable now.
babymatteo said:
I hate people who can't ****3n read forum rules!
Sent from my ASUS Transformer Pad TF300T using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
since when was an issue with jellybean or aokp NOT a development discussion i would hardly ask the question in tf300t accesories now would i? So instead of been unhelpfull why dont you go indulge yourself in the forum rules you clearly havnt read them so maybe you should read section 2.1 2.3 and 2.5 of the forum rules i can outline them to you as follows
2.1 Language: XDA is a worldwide community. As a result what is ‘ok’ to say in your part of the world may not be ok in someone else’s part of the world. Please think about who is reading what you write. Keep in mind that what you think of as acceptable use of language may not be acceptable to others. Conversely, while reading member posts, remember that word you find offensive may not be to the writer. Tolerance is a two way street.
2.3 Flaming: XDA was founded as a group of people sharing information about certain mobile phones. Sharing does not involve virtual yelling (flaming) it does involve working together to solve problems in an environment of mutual respect and understanding. Losing your temper and flaming another member, or group of members, is not acceptable behavior.
2.5 Courtesy towards other Members: Treat new members the way you would like to have been treated when you were a new member. When dealing with any member, provide them with guidance, advice and instruction when you can and always with respect and courtesy. Never post in a demanding, argumentative, disrespectful or self-righteous manner.
stephenuk said:
since when was an issue with jellybean or aokp NOT a development discussion i would hardly ask the question in tf300t accesories now would i?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Because it has nothing to do with development...
I have absolutely no freezes on jb my tablet flies literally. you need to have patients read the forum and take things step by step before you complain. Jb isn't the problem . You just need to learn trial and error till you get things going right.
Sent from my SGH-I717 using xda app-developers app
well its a question about downgrading back to ics so i can use aokp type roms if thats not a development discussion regarding using a custom rom which does seem to pretty frequent in this forum but hey maybe its just an illusion but there is no need for rudeness and swearin from a fellow forum member a polite "this is not the correct forum would of sufficed"
diamantericos said:
I have absolutely no freezes on jb my tablet flies literally. you need to have patients read the forum and take things step by step before you complain. Jb isn't the problem . You just need to learn trial and error till you get things going right.
Sent from my SGH-I717 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
im using hydros because stock was awfull
stephenuk said:
well its a question about downgrading back to ics so i can use aokp type roms if thats not a development discussion regarding using a custom rom which does seem to pretty frequent in this forum but hey maybe its just an illusion
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Development pertains to roms, not ota and downgrading.
But you're not alone... Most people I know hate the jb ota... Glad I didn't take it and stuck with cm10 instead.
Think some people just need to re-watch the registration video
beepea206 said:
Development pertains to roms, not ota and downgrading.
But you're not alone... Most people I know hate the jb ota... Glad I didn't take it and stuck with cm10 instead.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yeah i wish i had.
just wish you could revert back i miss being able to use overskreen which just crashes now
beepea206 said:
Development pertains to roms, not ota and downgrading.
But you're not alone... Most people I know hate the jb ota... Glad I didn't take it and stuck with cm10 instead.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
hopefully someone will crack it soon
stephenuk said:
yeah i wish i had i just wish you could...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My brain just exploded a little
Bolandk said:
My brain just exploded a little
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
just little? its fixed now
stephenuk said:
well its a question about downgrading back to ics so i can use aokp type roms if thats not a development discussion regarding using a custom rom which does seem to pretty frequent in this forum but hey maybe its just an illusion but there is no need for rudeness and swearin from a fellow forum member a polite "this is not the correct forum would of sufficed"
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Unless I'm reading wrong there is no question in your op or title, so it should have been posted in the general forum. Also has nothing to do with development.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
stephenuk said:
yeah i wish i had.
just wish you could revert back i miss being able to use overskreen which just crashes now
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You can. You have to flash the ics blob with the pc tool... That will remove the jb rom and bootloader.
beepea206 said:
You can. You have to flash the ics blob with the pc tool... That will remove the jb rom and bootloader.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You are mistaken. The only way to revert the bootloader back to ICS is with nvflash, and that does not and will never work with the JB bootloader unless Asus or nVidia release it (which they are not going to).
Check out this post in the official CM10 thread.
I've not had one issue with JB OTA, but my Tf300 was updated straight out the box, nothing at all installed on it.
Its now 2 weeks old and I've now unlocked the bootloader and rooted it, install about 50 apps and its still buttery smooth, with no freezes or reboots.
bmonster said:
I've not had one issue with JB OTA, but my Tf300 was updated straight out the box, nothing at all installed on it.
Its now 2 weeks old and I've now unlocked the bootloader and rooted it, install about 50 apps and its still buttery smooth, with no freezes or reboots.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It seems a factory reset (if your device is old) should help things significantly from what I've read.

[Q] Skyrocket roms?

I was wondering from user preference what is the best custom rom for the skyrocket? I have jellybean and love it but I want to overclock the processor just dont want a OS that's buggy and inconvenient for daily use.
I know there any probably many threads about this just wanted to start my own before I go rom happy
My skyrocket is rooted from ordin and I have twrp recovery.
I have never actually flashed a rom on a android just rooted several. I am getting the gs4 next week just want to have a little fun with my skyrocket in the meanwhile.
Thanks.
mod please move
didnt mean to post a question in this section, my bad.
No best rom threads are allowed! If you want to go flash happy before you get your S4 try them all out pick the one best for you.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using xda premium
EQ2192012 said:
No best rom threads are allowed! If you want to go flash happy before you get your S4 try them all out pick the one best for you.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1
Only you can decide what ROM is best for you. Do your research, read the threads (take the time and read the whole thread!) And make your own choice.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using xda premium
Dude really...
if you read my stickies you would have seen the those questions aren't allowed, its a forum/mod rule and will be eventually locked
my suggestion is to read the stickies before you start flashing away as its obvious you haven't
from the sticky "read this b4 posting", its a post above your post
28) Q. which rom is the "BEST" rom or any adjective thereof for a rom
A. do not ask as it will be locked by the mod, read about them in the dev forum and decide on your own
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
vincom said:
if you read my stickies you would have seen the those questions aren't allowed, its a forum/mod rule and will be eventually locked
my suggestion is to read the stickies before you start flashing away as its obvious you haven't
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You quoted the wrong guy Vin .
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using Tapatalk 2
mtdew said:
You quoted the wrong guy Vin .
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ya I re-edited
eatsleepAndroid said:
I was wondering from user preference what is the best custom rom for the skyrocket? I have jellybean and love it but I want to overclock the processor just dont want a OS that's buggy and inconvenient for daily use.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I started flashing more than one month ago and I started with the most popular (threads with a lot of posts) / recent ones.
Backuping and restoring is so easy with TWRP. So, keep your prefered ones as backups and make a choice!
If you to overclock, check the OP, it's always mentionned.
Good luck. And read
As mentioned, you really need to try them.
But I understand why you are asking as for the less technically competent user (i.e. me) its hard to easily flash and switch, and its hard to really gauge all the differences.
I do think its personal and depends on what you are looking for.
I can tell you for me I have tried a few and settled on Embryo. Its very stable for me, and with others I found myself having to do a level of troubleshooting and diagnosis that, while easy for others, was hard for me. And so that wasnt a good tradeoff for me. I wanted something stable and easy to tweak and use, even if its at the expense of slightly slower performance, etc. But thats a very personal decision, and everyones results vary depending on their phone, apps, usage, etc.
Thats why people are so reluctant to answer these questions - they arent trying to be difficult!
Good explanation. People aren't trying to be difficult, just tired of answering this question.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using xda app-developers app

Categories

Resources