Database Info

[KERNEL][28 APR]LorDMod|SMARTASS|BFSv400|CFS|SLQB|UV|1.99GHz|VOL|V DD|SQ LITE3|

http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1020637
DON'T USE THE ROM, IT IS OUTDATED AND HAS BEEN DISCONTINUED!
DO NOT USE THE "PUV" (Pinky UnderVolt) VERSION, IT WILL CAUSE YOUR DEVICE TO GET STUCK AT THE SPLASHSCREEN! (POSSIBLY)
I DID NOT MAKE THIS KERNEL, I'M JUST POSTING IT HERE FOR YOU ALL.
THIS IS NOT FOR ANY OTHER ROMS BESIDES CM7 (AND CM7-BASED ROMS) AND MIUI, SO DON'T ASK!
I'm using the UUV CFS version. It is very fast and smooth, I urge you not to have an OC past 1.3GHz as a daily driver, unless you want horrible battery life.
Any option below PUV is safe (UUV, -50mV, and -25mV all work, but every device varies).

i didnt think my phone could ever sh*t itself until i flashed this kernal.

dethpikil said:
i didnt think my phone could ever sh*t itself until i flashed this kernal.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i logged in just to ask you to decrypt that message. what does that mean? bad kernal?

vln004 said:
i logged in just to ask you to decrypt that message. what does that mean? bad kernal?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
lol, iffy kernal. especially with two versions available, its kinda strange testing them and seeing whats best for your phone. flashed the cfs version, and as expected, things seemed evenly smother throughout the phone, yet even at 1.99, there was nothing special or over the top about performance. also, i had a very strange, completely indescribable hiccup after booting.
EDIT
tried the bfs version, and still nothing special. maybe its just me and my miui rom. the 1.99 is cool, but i think im just gunna stay away from this.

Been running his kernels for a couple of weeks, no issues. It is nice to be able to choose from different undervolt versions. Helps battery life a little, around 5%-10% in my experience.

NikolaiT, just FYI this kernel works with Ultimate Droid, which is based on CM7. In case you want to update the OP.

henrybravo said:
NikolaiT, just FYI this kernel works with Ultimate Droid, which is based on CM7. In case you want to update the OP.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1. Running 4.2 cfs -25 version on UD now. 4.0 was the best battery life ever on any cm7 based roms. Haven't tried the puv version yet, but rest assured I will try and report results..
Sent from my Desire HD using Tapatalk

dethpikil said:
lol, iffy kernal. especially with two versions available, its kinda strange testing them and seeing whats best for your phone. flashed the cfs version, and as expected, things seemed evenly smother throughout the phone, yet even at 1.99, there was nothing special or over the top about performance. also, i had a very strange, completely indescribable hiccup after booting.
EDIT
tried the bfs version, and still nothing special. maybe its just me and my miui rom. the 1.99 is cool, but i think im just gunna stay away from this.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hardly "iffy", the differences are stated in the thread or here.
I've been using this kernel with CM7 Final for quite some time now and it's been quite solid.

rasroygbiv said:
+1. Running 4.2 cfs -25 version on UD now. 4.0 was the best battery life ever on any cm7 based roms. Haven't tried the puv version yet, but rest assured I will try and report results..
Sent from my Desire HD using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Careful, the PUV version softbricked my device. Easily fixable through reflashing your ROM or just a new kernel.
It may not brick yours because some devices can handle it, some can't.

helushune said:
Hardly "iffy", the differences are stated in the thread or here.
I've been using this kernel with CM7 Final for quite some time now and it's been quite solid.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1. Not "iffy" at all.

I've been using it for a while now. At the moment I'm using the latest CFS -25 UV version @ 1305 with the scaling set to Intelligent Donkey (lol) and I actually made it an entire day without charging. That's saying a lot for someone that gets about 12 hours max on a charge.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App

TheBassman369 said:
I've been using it for a while now. At the moment I'm using the latest CFS -25 UV version @ 1305 with the scaling set to Intelligent Donkey (lol) and I actually made it an entire day without charging. That's saying a lot for someone that gets about 12 hours max on a charge.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm currently pulling two days at 64% with the same kernel but my CPU settings are 122 min - 1075 max.

So what's everyone recommendations for the best version of this Kernel in terms of both optimum battery and performance?
Additionally... what kinds of CPU governors and max-min frequencies are you using? I've seen a few post what their using in this thread, but I'd like to get some more opinions.

I've been using this Kernel for a few weeks now with no issues. The UUV had some slight hesitation when scrolling so now I'm running 4.3 CFS with the -50 UV and it's absolutely perfect. Fantastic battery life running at 122/1305 MHz with the -50 UV.

i'm using 4.2 and I didn't flash any scripts... is the default -25UV? I'm gonna try 4.3 and -50 script later tonight.
quick question to the group: what is eating up your battery? mine, oddly enough is cell standby and phone idle. i'm using stock radio. in the past (on froyo builds), it's always been screen time.

substance12 said:
i'm using 4.2 and I didn't flash any scripts... is the default -25UV? I'm gonna try 4.3 and -50 script later tonight.
quick question to the group: what is eating up your battery? mine, oddly enough is cell standby and phone idle. i'm using stock radio. in the past (on froyo builds), it's always been screen time.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Default is no undervoltage.
Cell Standby and Phone Idle are my two biggest "battery killers" but that's normal operation.

henrybravo said:
+1. Not "iffy" at all.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
maybe all of you missed the whole miui thing. it says it works great with miui, but my phone seemed very buggy after switching from cattleprods kernel, but you tested it on very different roms than me. it addition, my quadrant score were crap on both types, cfs and bfs, which is completely contrary to the description of one over the other. so yes iffy.

Can anyone explain the difference between the scheduler flavors? I use cfs, but bfq or io?

dethpikil said:
maybe all of you missed the whole miui thing. it says it works great with miui, but my phone seemed very buggy after switching from cattleprods kernel, but you tested it on very different roms than me. it addition, my quadrant score were crap on both types, cfs and bfs, which is completely contrary to the description of one over the other. so yes iffy.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I sure did. Pardon.
sugardaddy1979 said:
Can anyone explain the difference between the scheduler flavors? I use cfs, but bfq or io?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Check these two posts: Post 1, Post 2. Looks like BFQ is the standard scheduler and VIO is quicker on paper (kind of like BFS vs CFS).

Thanks for the explanation. The bfqhs seems much smoother than the io. I am running it with the uuv.

Undervolt Kernel without lack of HSPUPA? Or battary reduction options?

Hello I have run both the stock cm7 and cattleprods 4.3.1 with smartass
Even going as far as to use SetCPU profiles to reduce CPU to 245 min/Max on screen lock. Im able to squeeze 11-12 hours with decent usage
from what I unslderstand reading the lord UV kernal people are lacking hsupa which is something I rather like. And while im ok with 12hours usage if something unexpected it long dinner party after work, im SOL
Any help or tips would be great
Thanks
Drew
Sent from my Desire HD using XDA App

HSUPA seems to be hit or miss on the LorDmod kernel which is strange because it's based off the CM7 kernel by Kali-. I changed my APN and my HSUPA speeds came back, at least what's normal for me in my area (3.5mbps down/2mbps up).
I was pulling a little over 48 hours out of the -25mV undervolt BFQhs version before it needed a charge or it wouldn't last the next day. I'm currently running the Pinky Ultra Undervolt version and will see what kind of battery life I can pull out of it.

Wrong forum for this. It should be in general but the lordmod kernel probably isn't the hsupa killer it was probably the radio swap I did. I fixed it but it was a PITA!
Sent from my HTC Inspire 4G running CyanogenMod 7 using Tapatalk.

HSUPA seems to be hit or miss on the LorDmod kernel which is strange because it's based off the CM7 kernel by Kali-. I changed my APN and my HSUPA speeds came back, at least what's normal for me in my area (3.5mbps down/2mbps up).
I was pulling a little over 48 hours out of the -25mV undervolt BFQhs version before it needed a charge or it wouldn't last the next day. I'm currently running the Pinky Ultra Undervolt version and will see what kind of battery life I can pull out of it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can I get a little assistance? I read throughout the your thread and the one u linked. There are about 15 different kernals and UV zips
Thanks. Im really interested in trying this out
Drew
Sent from my Desire HD using XDA App

Mustang302LX said:
Wrong forum for this. It should be in general but the lordmod kernel probably isn't the hsupa killer it was probably the radio swap I did. I fixed it but it was a PITA!
Sent from my HTC Inspire 4G running CyanogenMod 7 using Tapatalk.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry I couldent figure which forum would be most appropriate
anyone can move it if they are so inclined.
Drew
Sent from my Desire HD using XDA App

helushune said:
HSUPA seems to be hit or miss on the LorDmod kernel which is strange because it's based off the CM7 kernel by Kali-. I changed my APN and my HSUPA speeds came back, at least what's normal for me in my area (3.5mbps down/2mbps up).
I was pulling a little over 48 hours out of the -25mV undervolt BFQhs version before it needed a charge or it wouldn't last the next day. I'm currently running the Pinky Ultra Undervolt version and will see what kind of battery life I can pull out of it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do you just flash the lordmodV4.4.1-BFS-BFQ.zip file in recovery?
What do you do with lowervoltages-25.zip?
Thanks for the assistance this will be my first UV type kernel
Drew

drewdatrip said:
Do you just flash the lordmodV4.4.1-BFS-BFQ.zip file in recovery?
What do you do with lowervoltages-25.zip?
Thanks for the assistance this will be my first UV type kernel
Drew
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wipe Cache and load the 2 .zip files just like a ROM. Hopefully you won't lose HSUPA like I did (I still think it was the radio swap but I refuse to try this again as it was a pain to fix).

Sounds good. Ill report back with my findings regarding the HSUPA and overall batt improvements.
Thanks
Drew

drewdatrip said:
Sounds good. Ill report back with my findings regarding the HSUPA and overall batt improvements.
Thanks
Drew
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'll tell you the -50mV kernel mod froze the phone numerous times when opening an app to where I had to pull battery. The -25mV mod didn't help at all for my battery life. My phone drained same as always which is terrible but not great either.

drewdatrip said:
Can I get a little assistance? I read throughout the your thread and the one u linked. There are about 15 different kernals and UV zips
Thanks. Im really interested in trying this out
Drew
Sent from my Desire HD using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'd say go with BFQhs CFS or the V(R) I/O flavor (edit: scratch that, looks like he pulled the VIO one until tomorrow), they're supposed to be faster than the others. The non-undervolted kernel might give you fine battery life so there's a possibility you won't need to undervolt at all. Also, flashing an undervolt patch is optional.
Unlike Mustang, my phone responded extremely well to the -25mV but seemed to go back to typical drain when I switched over to -50mV. And it seems like it's enjoying the Pinky ultra undervolt so far. Like LorDmod says, try them out and see what works.
Flashing the kernel's simple,
Do a backup
Reboot in to recovery
Clear /cache
Clear Dalvik cache
Install kernel zip
Install undervolt zip (optional)
Reboot and enjoy

This is just my experience - during extensive testing for my APN modification thread I ran multiple versions of lordmod and never lost HSUPA speeds from the kernel itself. Any loss of speeds were due to other issues which were identified and corrected.

henrybravo said:
This is just my experience - during extensive testing for my APN modification thread I ran multiple versions of lordmod and never lost HSUPA speeds from the kernel itself. Any loss of speeds were due to other issues which were identified and corrected.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah like I said I'm 99.9% sure it was the change in radio that did me in but it just so happened to be just before flashing the kernel and I didn't notice till the next day I lost HSUPA. I personally will stick with stock CM7 kernel just because I messed with my own head lol.

I just flashed the kernal last night with the -25. HSUPA is still intact. Ill report back on Bat life
Drew

helushune said:
Unlike Mustang, my phone responded extremely well to the -25mV but seemed to go back to typical drain when I switched over to -50mV. And it seems like it's enjoying the Pinky ultra undervolt so far. Like LorDmod says, try them out and see what works.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have only tried -50mV with the latest LordMod which after 2 days is giving about same battery life as stock CM7 (about 20-24hr with moderate use). I cannot explain how -25mV gave you better battery life. I don't understand how much the other 2 version undervolts.
As a whole now tried OC/UV on both the Captivate and the Inspire, I have not noticed a significant difference in battery life with either of these phones. Also it seems like all the ROMs give me about the same battery life, and the whole thing about re-calibrate your battery if you don't flash with a full battery hasn't held up for me either. I can flash a new rom with 30% battery or 100% my battery drain remains unchanged.

gordec said:
I have only tried -50mV with the latest LordMod which after 2 days is giving about same battery life as stock CM7 (about 20-24hr with moderate use). I cannot explain how -25mV gave you better battery life. I don't understand how much the other 2 version undervolts.
As a whole now tried OC/UV on both the Captivate and the Inspire, I have not noticed a significant difference in battery life with either of these phones. Also it seems like all the ROMs give me about the same battery life, and the whole thing about re-calibrate your battery if you don't flash with a full battery hasn't held up for me either. I can flash a new rom with 30% battery or 100% my battery drain remains unchanged.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My experience mirrors yours. No matter where my battery is when I flash a ROM the drain remains the same. I've also done the whole wipe of battery stats and no difference either. It lasts me long enough as I charge it overnight anyways while I sleep so oh well I'm not too worried about it anymore really.
I recently removed the battery percent from the status bar. All I ended up doing was obsessing over it and had to see where it was all the time. So now I just use the gauge and feel better about the battery lol and not even focus on battery too much unless I'm away from my charger for an extended period of time.

I use lord mod 4.4 and I have hsupa. I never lost it.
Sent from my Inspire 4G using XDA Premium App

Mustang302LX said:
I'll tell you the -50mV kernel mod froze the phone numerous times when opening an app to where I had to pull battery. The -25mV mod didn't help at all for my battery life. My phone drained same as always which is terrible but not great either.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That is because your device can't handle it, every device handles it differently.
As an example, my device handles UUV fine, but when attempting to use PUV it boots, but with any random reboots and application FCs.

NikolaiT said:
That is because your device can't handle it, every device handles it differently.
As an example, my device handles UUV fine, but when attempting to use PUV it boots, but with any random reboots and application FCs.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Right which sucks cause I wanted to try the others lol. Oh well I guess.
Sent from my HTC Inspire 4G running CyanogenMod 7 using Tapatalk.

gordec said:
I have only tried -50mV with the latest LordMod which after 2 days is giving about same battery life as stock CM7 (about 20-24hr with moderate use). I cannot explain how -25mV gave you better battery life. I don't understand how much the other 2 version undervolts.
As a whole now tried OC/UV on both the Captivate and the Inspire, I have not noticed a significant difference in battery life with either of these phones. Also it seems like all the ROMs give me about the same battery life, and the whole thing about re-calibrate your battery if you don't flash with a full battery hasn't held up for me either. I can flash a new rom with 30% battery or 100% my battery drain remains unchanged.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Trust me, it makes absolutely no logical sense to me either. It seems to really like the PUV version as well so I'm not complaining.
For me, there is a noticeable difference between the stock kernel and undervolting. Stock CM7, my phone drains at around 3% per hour. Undervolted, it's slightly less than 1% per hour and possibly even better with PUV.

With the CFS BFQhs and -25 UV I got another hour and change. I feel like I used it the same maybe more. Im gonna try another one of his kernel and maybe the -50 or UUV see if NY device can hang with it.
Sent from my Desire HD using XDA App

Best kernel to keep things simple, stable

I'm really very happy with my Nexus S 4G. It's unlocked and rooted, but otherwise pure stock and I really like it that way.
Coming from the Hero it's a pleasure to have a phone that doesn't require heavy modification to make it perform properly. Still, I miss the thrill of flashing ROM's and kernels.
I would like to try a kernel...mainly to simply o/c a bit, but I don't want it to suffer stable and reliable operation. I recall with the Hero, some of the kernels would adversely affect things like the GPS, making it something I couldn't rely on.
So my question: what kernel can I use that is uncapped, but will otherwise be as close to stock as possible?
Thanks for your thoughts!

Kernels are pretty different over here. I don't even know what's closest to stock. They pretty much all have mods in them. Matr1x kernel is pretty popular. You may have to up the voltage for it if you oc to 14xx. 1200 seemed pretty stable to me with default voltages. Currently franco kernel is pretty popular. You can't oc it, but it seems pretty snappy without oc. GLaDOS is also being used a bit but i've read some mixed reviews and for me at least it did seem a little lagging at times for the short period I ran it. I tried Trinity kernel when I first moved over from the hero and it seemed kind of flaky though it's possible that could have been due to the kang I was running. There are a few others out there. Cm7 kernel has a lot of the same mods cooked in though it's likely not the latest updates. You will see a lot of mention of BLN and Voodoo. There are apps on the market for those features and there's an app nstools that has some kernel config settings you can adjust depending on kernel. Mainly just try to read a lot. Most of the roms and kernels haven't given me any major issues beyond the random reboot, which coming from the hero, just means "normal" lol.
Sent from my Nexus S 4G running CM7/franco.Kernel

Once you flash you can't stop O_O that my experience i'll direct you to Peteralfonso's kernel on his website here

Searching the forums would help you more than anything. You will get more info by searching, rather waiting people to reply here. These questions are asked on daily basis. And get the same replies everyday. I don't sound to be mean but seriously there is more info than you can get by starting another thread, only thing is you need to dig the info.

I have tried a few different roms and kernels and for once cm7 runs perfect for me w the supplied kernel. No reboots. Has been stable at 1440 performance for testing but I usually leave it at 1000 on demand.

Yeah they all have this blinking light crap in it now by default which I hate, and the lights turn off and I don't like that either. I want the light on when I'm using the phone and off when I'm not, not the other way around!
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA App

I like the bln mod, but I do not like the one that turns off the backlights when using the phone. It's just easier to use the buttons imo and gives a quicker visual reference for everything. Otherwise I mostly am left wondering what is up with all the black space.
Sent from my Nexus S 4G running CM7/franco.Kernel

suhas_sm said:
Searching the forums would help you more than anything. You will get more info by searching, rather waiting people to reply here. These questions are asked on daily basis. And get the same replies everyday. I don't sound to be mean but seriously there is more info than you can get by starting another thread, only thing is you need to dig the info.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I hear you on that, and spent a lot of time reading comments and concerns and problems about the various kernels available. They all seem to pretty much be experimental, with various idiosyncratic problems and lots of bells and whistles such as aforementioned BLN, Voodoo, deep idle, etc.
I thought maybe I was missing something in my search for a kernel that would allow o/c, but not have the stability concerns of a the feature-rich, highly customizable kernels.

I think the Matr1x kernel will be your best option, u can OC it till 1400mhz, what I don't recommend to do, but at 1200/1300mhz its pretty stable.
It also got many options like BLN, BLX, Live OC, touch wake, etc.
But if you don't want them, why you just don't use 'em?
Like just flash the kernel and keep it like it is, and maybe do some overclocking.

wanna stable ? stock kernel
basically , there is no kernel more stable then stock ...

qtwrk said:
wanna stable ? stock kernel
basically , there is no kernel more stable then stock ...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
True, but he prefers to OC it a bit.
Sent from my Nexus S

franciscofranco's kernel (link) works best for me. It's fast (no lags even without OC, I'm running at stock 1000 MHz), reliable (I've been using it for at least month and I haven't got any random reboots or application hangs) and battery efficient (thanks to deep idle and other tweaks).

irizwan said:
Once you flash you can't stop O_O that my experience i'll direct you to Peteralfonso's kernel on his website here
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1
Never found a more stable kernel than Pete's. However, I've been on Glados for the last week or so and am seeing excellent battery life with Deep Idle.

Icecoldmeat said:
True, but he prefers to OC it a bit.
Sent from my Nexus S
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
personally i think overclock is totally unnecessary , why ? 1 GHz is sufficient to handle all job you require to the phone...

Best thing to do would be compile your own stock kernel with oc.

qtwrk said:
personally i think overclock is totally unnecessary , why ? 1 GHz is sufficient to handle all job you require to the phone...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
True again. I love 1100mhz because it gives you a bit more speed with no lagg, and you batterylife is still awesome.
Sent from my Nexus S

deville~> said:
franciscofranco's kernel (link) works best for me. It's fast (no lags even without OC, I'm running at stock 1000 MHz), reliable (I've been using it for at least month and I haven't got any random reboots or application hangs) and battery efficient (thanks to deep idle and other tweaks).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
with deep idle OFF, the difference between the two is minimal, idle stats displayed deep idle has been 0

Downloaded and testing peter alfonso's kernel now. Its very minimalistic, no options like deep idle etc, and u can OC it up to 1400mhz. Running 400-1100mhz for a day now and the battery life is just awesome.
U can find it on:
http://www.peteralfonso.com
Sent from my Nexus S

albundy2010 said:
Best thing to do would be compile your own stock kernel with oc.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Or one with LiveOC which is kinda better cause it also OC the GPU =D
+1
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
the akward moment when someone said they +1'd you but actually didn't -_-

there're too many to choose.i don't like the ones that update so often indeed.

[Q] Any consensus on the best configuration for a G2x?

Hi all. I've spent more time than I should over the past week or so looking through these forums (thank you all for the amazing amount of work that's been put in), but really haven't been able to figure out the answer to the following question: What's the best configuration for this phone?
I've been running EaglesBlood, which is OK but somewhat buggy (battery drain, random turning on of phone button lights, etc). Is there any configuration that's stable, fast, and decent?

SINGH-UI + Mazout360 Kernel
I am very happy with my setup:
SINGH-UI MIUI with Mazout360's kernel
I was using Faux123's 054 kernel with lg voltage which was working very well but Mazout's kernel is newer, faster and fixes a wifi issue that was causing reboots when turning wifi-related stuff on and off. I'm still testing it for stability but so far so good.
I haven't tried the ICS and Jelly Bean ROMS.

vanilla cm7 w/ mazouts kernel
"my mind draws lots of blanks actually"

Pardon my ignorance, but I don't quite understand how one can be running cm7 (or SINGH-UI MIUI) and mazout's kernel. Aren't they different roms? I'm missing some basic understanding here.
justjackyl said:
vanilla cm7 w/ mazouts kernel
"my mind draws lots of blanks actually"
Click to expand...
Click to collapse

This is more or less how it works. The "rom" is mostly blue stuff.

natescape said:
Pardon my ignorance, but I don't quite understand how one can be running cm7 (or SINGH-UI MIUI) and mazout's kernel. Aren't they different roms? I'm missing some basic understanding here.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
A kernel is just a layer that interacts between the ROM and the physical hardware.
Like a car:
ROM = Body
Kernel= Engine
You can pull the engine and put it in a different body.
Poor analogy probably lol
"my mind draws lots of blanks actually"

justjackyl said:
vanilla cm7 w/ mazouts kernel
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Seems it could last for days with the right configuration. I don't know what it would be except turning off data when not in use, and turning off auto sync.
Sent from my LG-P999 using xda app-developers app

adamiscool said:
Seems it could last for days with the right configuration. I don't know what it would be except turning off data when not in use, and turning off auto sync.
Sent from my LG-P999 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What?
Sent from my LG-P999 using Tapatalk 2

Mazout's 218 kernel and CM7 2-1-13 works pretty well for me. Although, I think I was getting slightly better battery life on Mazout's 205 kernel.

figuratively said:
Mazout's 218 kernel and CM7 2-1-13 works pretty well for me. Although, I think I was getting slightly better battery life on Mazout's 205 kernel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agreed. Better battery on 0205.!
"my mind draws lots of blanks actually"

Thanks guys!
So if I was to try one of these configs, first I'd install the ROM, then the kernel?
justjackyl said:
Agreed. Better battery on 0205.!
"my mind draws lots of blanks actually"
Click to expand...
Click to collapse

natescape said:
Thanks guys!
So if I was to try one of these configs, first I'd install the ROM, then the kernel?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That is correct

dEris said:
What?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Apps like to sync in the background. These settings can be changed to be turned off or run at a different interval of time. The mazkrnl and cm7 nightly has gotten me beyond 24hrs of use, but I think it can go beyond that with the right settings. I believe it could last a week or more. That clear it up?
Edit: haha, I mean...I don't know if you're trolling or what.
Sent from my LG-P999

natescape said:
Thanks guys!
So if I was to try one of these configs, first I'd install the ROM, then the kernel?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm also fairly new to all this and I would just like to offer some tips:
1. ensure you have the newest baseband before doing anything
Check your phone (Settings->System->About phone) Should be March 2012 Baseband
If you don't have the new baseband, there are a few tutorials such as this one
2. Install ROM and kernel if needed
3. Install the recommended google apps zip as instructed
4. Install GetRIL from app store and use it to install matching RIL
5. I believe you should Install a cpu control app for power saving (I'm using Antutu CPU master)
You could install kernel last. ROMS come with their own kernels.

m3mb3rsh1p said:
I'm also fairly new to all this and I would just like to offer some tips:
1. ensure you have the newest baseband before doing anything
Check your phone (Settings->System->About phone) Should be March 2012 Baseband
If you don't have the new baseband, there are a few tutorials such as this one
2. Install ROM and kernel if needed
3. Install the recommended google apps zip as instructed
4. Install GetRIL from app store and use it to install matching RIL
5. I believe you should Install a cpu control app for power saving (I'm using Antutu CPU master)
You could install kernel last. ROMS come with their own kernels.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you switch to the March 2012 Baseband, you WILL LOSE Bluetooth Calling on any custom ROM used. I HIGHLY advise NOT switching basebands if you are a bluetooth headset user.

New2my8125 said:
If you switch to the March 2012 Baseband, you WILL LOSE Bluetooth Calling on any custom ROM used. I HIGHLY advise NOT switching basebands if you are a bluetooth headset user.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1
"my mind draws lots of blanks actually"

huh
I did not know that. I guess I should find out what's good about the newest baseband and quick one is best...

Quick Question
This post is the guide I used when upgrading my baseband. I'll use it to downgrade when I start using bluetooth audio.

m3mb3rsh1p said:
This post is the guide I used when upgrading my baseband. I'll use it to downgrade when I start using bluetooth audio.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
its only bt call audio that doesn't work on 21y. media audio works fine.
"my mind draws lots of blanks actually"

I installed CM 7.2 and gapps with no issues, but Mazout's kernel doesn't seem to be loading. I get a "Problem loading widget" error. What might I be doing wrong?

Battery life with Liquidsmooth 2.3 Official...

So lately I've been working late and I am allowed to use my phone to listen to music at work. On days that I work late, I am forced to bring my phone charger to work because it doesn't last me all day, not even close. According to my battery page in settings, I've had a screen time of only 40 minutes today, and listened to roughly only 20 minutes of music with a few short texts sent here and there and I'm already down to 74% battery life. I am running the most recent official Liquidsmooth (2.3 release) and have my brightness turned way down, and the CPU turned down to a max of 1124Mhz. I am also running the kernel that comes with the ROM, which I'm almost positive is LeanKernel.
Is it normal to be draining my battery this fast with not even an hour of screen time and barely using it? I even turn off data usage when I don't use my phone because I'm concerned about battery life. Is there anything I can do to improve battery life? I don't even touch the Voltage Settings and Advanced Settings under the Performance section, because I don't want to touch anything I don't know what to do or what settings make the ROM unstable. Anyone who can suggest good settings for more stable battery life, even if it sacrifices performance would be a huge help too! Thank you in advanced
Sent from my Samsung SCH-I535 running Liquidsmooth 4.2.2

Hear hear. Great rom but something is burning my battery in this rom.

I agree! I love it, I've tried so many ones and this is the only one I've been completely satisfied with basically every aspect! Except the only thing I can complain about is the battery life. Anyone have any suggestions?! I'm already down to 55% battery now
Sent from my Samsung SCH-I535 running Liquidsmooth 4.2.2

Same here. I'm only getting about 10-12 hours of battery life. Read some suggestion about using the KT747 kernel but not sure which download to use. Touchwiz 4.1.2, AOSP Jellybean 4.2 Linux 3.0, AOSP Jellybean 4.2 Linux 3.2?
~One confused noob.

pestalilla said:
Same here. I'm only getting about 10-12 hours of battery life. Read some suggestion about using the KT747 kernel but not sure which download to use. Touchwiz 4.1.2, AOSP Jellybean 4.2 Linux 3.0, AOSP Jellybean 4.2 Linux 3.2?
~One confused noob.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The correct kernel is the AOSP 3.4 Linux version. That being said I just flashed that kernel with 2.2 last night and it seized up my phone. Nandroid now. So that was a bad night.

arathorn4 said:
The correct kernel is the AOSP 3.4 Linux version. That being said I just flashed that kernel with 2.2 last night and it seized up my phone. Nandroid now. So that was a bad night.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks! I downloaded and flashed it. No problems here. Just need to find the correct tweaks for better battery life.

Let me know what you find. I'm still on the stock lean kernel for LS

I'm curious as well what these battery tweaks are. I installed liquidsmooth 2.4 over the weekend and have since moved back to my rooted stock primarily because of battery drain. I really like the aosp interface but can't afford to have it rape my battery. I was getting like 6 Hrs only on a charge. With my stock rooted rom I get about 19 Hrs on a full charge.

I am using liquidsmooth 2.4 and have been going for 17hrs today still got 20% left. I have the lean kernel that it flashes with and never had battery issues.
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda premium

bbqsfire said:
I am using liquidsmooth 2.4 and have been going for 17hrs today still got 20% left. I have the lean kernel that it flashes with and never had battery issues.
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wow that's impressive. Did you do a clean install of the rom or did you do a upgrade from a previous version? Did you have do any post install tweaks other than the usual (settting screen brightness to low and etc)?

Mayimbe007 said:
Wow that's impressive. Did you do a clean install of the rom or did you do a upgrade from a previous version? Did you have do any post install tweaks other than the usual (settting screen brightness to low and etc)?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Clean install of the rom. I actually came from hyper drive. No other tweaks done. I leave anything off that I am not using. Don't leave nfc or bluetooth on. Don't use sync for very much.
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda premium

Today I took it off charge at 6 and I have used 92 minutes of talk time, 50 texts(kinda low), xda, email, Internet, YouTube, and some other forums and I still have 42 percent. Other than text messages I would say I have used the phone moderate to heavy.
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda premium