Database Info

How many people are running 2 2 1 with EP1Q radio

I ask this question because I'm running gummy Fe 2.0 with the EP1Q and I'm wondering if i switch back to ee4 radio if ill notice a difference at all
Sent from my SCH-I510 using XDA App

I'm running gummy 2.0 with the EP1Q radio. No problems whatsoever.
The rom is independent from the modem from what I understand and I have been getting better service with this radio.

I just downloaded the EPQ1 radios yesterday as i was having some troubles with the 4g dropping and have had great signal so far. I will keep an eye on it and report back in a week. Of the phone calls I've made today, all were crystal clear and good volume so fingers are crossed that my problems are solved.

For me, there wasn't much of a difference
Sent from my Galaxy Tab running MIUI

It was better at holding the 4g signal but nothing else has been too noticeable. Still better then ee4, that **** switches between 3g/4g every 10 minutes.

I've been running gummy 2.0 with the epq1 with no problem at all
Sent from my SCH-I510 using XDA App

I'm running gummy 1.9.1 with the EP1Q and it works fine but I hardly noticed any difference at all from the switch.
~John

Who says EP1Q is trouble some, Im loving it. I have been running since I was on 1.9, no voice issues either
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
I have never hit speeds like this on EE4, ever. Not to mention 4G is more consistent with much less searching

well my issue is that i've been experiencing data drop out like crazy sometimes and ive read of other people experiencing the same issue. i think i'll just reflash the EP1Q radio and see if that helps

For me, EP1Q modem has less data dropouts (4G->3G-1X) for me. Also, if it changes, the transition is fast.

I can also vouch for EP1Q, the data stream is definitely more stable in general, though I haven't really noticed any considerable speed improvements.

I only had the signal totally drop out on me once on EP1Q this past weekend but it quickly came back. Then again, they have said that they sent one of those roving techs to check my area and they have admitted my area needs a tower but they need to get approval from the higher-ups to install one.
Apparently Verizon has been doing a lot of work in my area according to some press release in which they are expanding 4G coverage in my area. They say that by Sept. 15th I should be seeing 4G in more places across my city. All I can say is that I'm happy to see that.
Oh, and I'm glad I have unlimited data since I've noticed that doing any kind of streaming anything, especially NetFlix can eat through data like nothing I've ever seen. That and Slacker Radio can cause you to eat data.

ddemlong said:
Who says EP1Q is trouble some, Im loving it. I have been running since I was on 1.9, no voice issues either
*removed pictures to keep quote small*
I have never hit speeds like this on EE4, ever. Not to mention 4G is more consistent with much less searching
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I thought the GB leak modems weren't accurate with speed tests? Or was that just the leak itself. Also....
jmorton10 said:
I'm running gummy 1.9.1 with the EP1Q and it works fine but I hardly noticed any difference at all from the switch.
~John
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
WHY AREN'T YOU ON 2.0?! Madness!

blarrick said:
I thought the GB leak modems weren't accurate with speed tests? Or was that just the leak itself. Also....
WHY AREN'T YOU ON 2.0?! Madness!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah the GB modems just didn't play well with the speedtest app itself.
However, going to the speakeasy speedtest site via your browser produces accurate results.

What is the baseband name for ep1q modems? I flahsed the q modems but my baseband version stayed the same. Either the flash didn't take or I already had them. Im on gummy2.0
Sent from my SCH-I510 using XDA App

blarrick said:
WHY AREN'T YOU ON 2.0?! Madness!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I thought about it, but my system runs perfectly and after looking at what 2.0 gives you I don't really see anything I care about.
I could care less about 7 different lock screens, I did the tweak to totally eliminate the lock screen. I tried the imoseon kernel briefly, but I kinda prefer the more saturated colors and ended up swapping back.
I think over clocking is a waste of time after trying it for a while, so unless I am missing something I don't really see what I would gain from the 2.0 swap although I am certainly open to suggestions??
~John

jmorton10 said:
I thought about it, but my system runs perfectly and after looking at what 2.0 gives you I don't really see anything I care about.
I could care less about 7 different lock screens, I did the tweak to totally eliminate the lock screen. I tried the imoseon kernel briefly, but I kinda prefer the more saturated colors and ended up swapping back.
I think over clocking is a waste of time after trying it for a while, so unless I am missing something I don't really see what I would gain from the 2.0 swap although I am certainly open to suggestions??
~John
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
its just more polished and stable.

msticlaru said:
its just more polished and stable.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm not sure how it could be any more stable than my system. Mine runs weeks at a time without a single freezeup or reboot if I want.
When you say it is "more polished", are you just talking about visual tweaks??
I must have changed ROMs 50 times when I had a TouchPro 2 and every time it was a noticeable improvement so I'm not opposed to switching for a good reason. My system now runs so well however, I don't really see any compelling reason to update just because a new version is out.
~John

jmorton10 said:
I'm not sure how it could be any more stable than my system. Mine runs weeks at a time without a single freezeup or reboot if I want.
When you say it is "more polished", are you just talking about visual tweaks??
I must have changed ROMs 50 times when I had a TouchPro 2 and every time it was a noticeable improvement so I'm not opposed to switching for a good reason. My system now runs so well however, I don't really see any compelling reason to update just because a new version is out.
~John
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
While there is no need to convince you as people can choose to run whatever version of whatever rom they want, I find it curious that you would choose to not update. It seems to me that the type of people that generally visit these forums and mess with their devices are the same type of people that generally want things when they are updated.
That aside...
1.9.1
*Fixed misc theme issues across the overall theme
*Removed AM/PM from the status-bar clock
2.0
*Custom kernel by IMoseyON
*TSMparts for modifications (more information below on usage)
*updated toolbox for simplicity (sorry no GUI 2.0 released at this time)
*updated base Theme (we did switch to a blue to give 2.0 a new look as it feels like a new rom)
*updated dialer completely remade to have the contacts built into the app
The updated kernel provides additional stability fixes and fluidity to the UI.
TSM parts is a very handy tool to have.
the update to the base theme gives the phone a more professional feel to it. (i.e. polish) the dialer is vastly better than the pervious.
Again, if you choose not to update, so be it. I could not care less one way or the other. You seem like an intelligent person, so you would know best what works for you.
To get this thread back on topic....
I am running the ep1q radios but as I mentioned earlier, I cant seem to find how to determine what version you are actually running. My Baseband version did not change when i updated the radios. I would like to say I am getting better performance.. but its hard to know if its the radios, or something else.
Any chance that one of you knows how to determine the radio that is installed?

msticlaru said:
While there is no need to convince you as people can choose to run whatever version of whatever rom they want, I find it curious that you would choose to not update. It seems to me that the type of people that generally visit these forums and mess with their devices are the same type of people that generally want things when they are updated
Again, if you choose not to update, so be it. I could not care less one way or the other. You seem like an intelligent person, so you would know best what works for you.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Actually, I'm usually as you say the kind of person that immediately updates everything as soon as possible. My system runs so well however, I just wasn't sure it was worth going through the PITA of setting up the whole system again.
Now, after reading your post however I may have to rethink that. If the system really will run better/more efficiently etc. I guess you have me getting the itch to update again.... ;-)
It seems like I have been working a million hours a week lately (I'm an IT Administrator among other things) but if/when I ever get some spare time I guess I will just get to it and update."....
~John

Are you happy with ICS 4.0.1 on the Nexus S?

Are you really happy with ICS on the Nexus S?
I need to say, i have tried any version that someone has created, i hate it.
Why? Because of the new multitasking, you can see 4 apps where you have seen 8 before, there seems to be no GPU acceleration in this view, it's sometimes slow and i just hate it.
The music player is soooo slow, needs around 2-3 seconds just to load if you open him for the first time. Yeah, Android has multitasking...but with only 512MB of the Nexus S this ****ty player will always be closed.
The Gallery app is also damn slow, it is not accurate to touch-points, it has laggy scrolling. The old 3D Gallery was just 1000 times better.
And then the home launcher...it force closes many times in the background, he lags sometimes and isn't working fine at all. Launcher Pro has proofed that fast launchers are REAL.
Other then that, it's OK...slower then GB, but OK...i hope Google will fix some things or i won't buy any further Android device...WP7 all the way (also just 1Ghz and 512MB but soooo fast)...

These are gn ports the official ics rom will be smoking
Sent from Oxygen 2.3.2 powered Nexus S 4G

bluefisch200 said:
Are you really happy with ICS on the Nexus S?
I need to say, i have tried any version that someone has created, i hate it.
Why? Because of the new multitasking, you can see 4 apps where you have seen 8 before, there seems to be no GPU acceleration in this view, it's sometimes slow and i just hate it.
The music player is soooo slow, needs around 2-3 seconds just to load if you open him for the first time. Yeah, Android has multitasking...but with only 512MB of the Nexus S this ****ty player will always be closed.
The Gallery app is also damn slow, it is not accurate to touch-points, it has laggy scrolling. The old 3D Gallery was just 1000 times better.
And then the home launcher...it force closes many times in the background, he is lags sometimes and isn't working fine at all. Launcher Pro has proofed that fast launchers are REAL.
Other then that, it's OK...slower then GB, but OK...i hope Google will fix some things or i won't buy any further Android device...WP7 all the way (also just 1Ghz and 512MB but soooo fast)...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Seems like your main gripe is with speed and stability which you have no reason to criticize on the current builds of ICS because of one simple reason:
The ICS port these ROMs are built on were not made for the Nexus S.
If you want to criticize, wouldn't it make sense to do so on the finished product and not on a ROM that some stranger threw together and posted on some forum? The ICS ROMs in the dev section are simply that. I'm actually surprised that CM threw their name on Koush's ROM as there is nothing official about it. One only has to look at the kernel to see that (read: they are using the GB kernel for an ICS ROM). That's all you need to look at.

Played with it just for playings sake, but as a daily driver, nope.
I'm a news nut and most sites still use flash a lot, BBC, CNN, MSNBC, e.t.c and no flash on ICS means no videos and such, plus just generally it's laggy, battery draining and just not satisfactory to me at all. Sygic GPS app wouldn't run and gave an error message about lack of hardware acceleration (?), amongst other annoyances.
Yes I know these are not official builds but one can still have an opinion like the OP, regardless.
Sent from my Nexus S 4G

Enhanced said:
Seems like your main gripe is with speed and stability which you have no reason to criticize on the current builds of ICS because of one simple reason:
The ICS port these ROMs are built on were not made for the Nexus S.
If you want to criticize, wouldn't it make sense to do so on the finished product and not on a ROM that some stranger threw together and posted on some forum? The ICS ROMs in the dev section are simply that. I'm actually surprised that CM threw their name on Koush's ROM as there is nothing official about it. One only has to look at the kernel to see that (read: they are using the GB kernel for an ICS ROM). That's all you need to look at.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, i hope that they can fix this...but from a developer standpoint (Not Android and Java) i can not see that such HUGE improvements can be done. For example, the gallery app has the same sluggish performance as the one on Honeycomb...

bluefisch200 said:
Are you really happy with ICS on the Nexus S?
I need to say, i have tried any version that someone has created, i hate it.
Why? Because of the new multitasking, you can see 4 apps where you have seen 8 before, there seems to be no GPU acceleration in this view, it's sometimes slow and i just hate it.
The music player is soooo slow, needs around 2-3 seconds just to load if you open him for the first time. Yeah, Android has multitasking...but with only 512MB of the Nexus S this ****ty player will always be closed.
The Gallery app is also damn slow, it is not accurate to touch-points, it has laggy scrolling. The old 3D Gallery was just 1000 times better.
And then the home launcher...it force closes many times in the background, he lags sometimes and isn't working fine at all. Launcher Pro has proofed that fast launchers are REAL.
Other then that, it's OK...slower then GB, but OK...i hope Google will fix some things or i won't buy any further Android device...WP7 all the way (also just 1Ghz and 512MB but soooo fast)...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How many times do we have to say that the current ICS roms are made of the GALAXY NEXUS source. So they are ''ports''. the offial update wil be wayy faster with the correct drivers for our device

bluefisch200 said:
Are you really happy with ICS on the Nexus S?
I need to say, i have tried any version that someone has created, i hate it.
Why? Because of the new multitasking, you can see 4 apps where you have seen 8 before, there seems to be no GPU acceleration in this view, it's sometimes slow and i just hate it.
The music player is soooo slow, needs around 2-3 seconds just to load if you open him for the first time. Yeah, Android has multitasking...but with only 512MB of the Nexus S this ****ty player will always be closed.
The Gallery app is also damn slow, it is not accurate to touch-points, it has laggy scrolling. The old 3D Gallery was just 1000 times better.
And then the home launcher...it force closes many times in the background, he lags sometimes and isn't working fine at all. Launcher Pro has proofed that fast launchers are REAL.
Other then that, it's OK...slower then GB, but OK...i hope Google will fix some things or i won't buy any further Android device...WP7 all the way (also just 1Ghz and 512MB but soooo fast)...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
1. Have you not scrolled the task switcher? I've counted up to 16 apps here and while it takes longer to open than I'd like, it scrolls smoothly for me 99% of the time.
2. FCs and random sluggishness are to be expected in Alpha builds but I haven't had any since updating to Alpha 13 + Franco's December 12 kernel.
3. Most importantly, this is not only Alpha but we don't even have a real ICS kernel yet. Please be patient.

ICS on Nexus S will gradually be faster, it'll take some time. Not too much longer since Google is working on releasing ICS for Nexus S via official OTA. So at least be thankful for that whereas other phones such as RAZR, Rezound, etc will have to wait longer and rely on the manufacturer.
If this is really a problem. Just get a Galaxy Nexus or go back to Gingerbread and work on CM7 kangs.

The devs here are doing a great job, but there's only so much they're capable of without official release kernels from Google. Once the official release comes out, the vast majority of performance and software bugs will be fixed. To see them even working this well at this point is a very good indicator, imo.

I prefer ICS so much, I havent gone back to GB since the SDK builds...
Long days and pleasant nights............

Lol this is funny. They are using gingerbread kernels, it isn't supposed to be speedy and perfect. Even though ''cm9'' works pretty fast with francisco kernel. And who uses stock player? Use poweramp its amazing.
Sent from my Nexus S using xda premium

pitmaster said:
I prefer ICS so much, I havent gone back to GB since the SDK builds...
Long days and pleasant nights............
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Same here. I'm loving the ics ports and have been running aosp's oICS since it was released.
Seems that many people are just not adept enough to be able to use android. Stick with iOS or W7 if you can't handle an ice cream sandwich.

v26 of oics is very nice....cant wait for the final ICS from google
cant wait for the roms from that!!!

I'm perfectly happy with
ICS in it's current form. No issues here that I didn't cause
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using xda premium

LordLugard said:
Played with it just for playings sake, but as a daily driver, nope.
I'm a news nut and most sites still use flash a lot, BBC, CNN, MSNBC, e.t.c and no flash on ICS means no videos and such, plus just generally it's laggy, battery draining and just not satisfactory to me at all. Sygic GPS app wouldn't run and gave an error message about lack of hardware acceleration (?), amongst other annoyances.
Yes I know these are not official builds but one can still have an opinion like the OP, regardless.
Sent from my Nexus S 4G
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Flash is available for ICS...
I really like the changes that Google made with ICS and I can't wait til we get an official build with the 3.0 kernel. For now I went back to CM7.1 just for the sake of speed and fluidity but as soon as official ICS is available I will likely say good-bye to GB for good.

mlin said:
Flash is available for ICS...
I really like the changes that Google made with ICS and I can't wait til we get an official build with the 3.0 kernel. For now I went back to CM7.1 just for the sake of speed and fluidity but as soon as official ICS is available I will likely say good-bye to GB for good.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Saw the announcement on various sites but have YET to actually see it in the market or able to install it. If you have a link, could you share it?

LordLugard said:
Saw the announcement on various sites but have YET to actually see it in the market or able to install it. If you have a link, could you share it?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Its just the newest Adobe that's in the market.
What's New
What's in this version:
This update to Adobe Flash Player 11 includes compatibility with Android 4 supported devices, performance improvements and bug fixes related to security and stability. The complete set of release notes can be found at: http://adobe.ly/s16mAX.
See if this works:
https://market.android.com/details?...1bGwsMSwyLDEsImNvbS5hZG9iZS5mbGFzaHBsYXllciJd

It says I already have it (how, i don't know) and when I click open, it pulls up a blank settings page. Version numbers match and all. Using oAOSP 4.0.1 ICS v27.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my Nexus S 4G

Very happy, actually.
Except for the stock ICS icons. Ugly. =(

then just use what make u happy

Weapon vs Bionix vs Cyanogen 7.1 Compare your experiences with this 3 roms :)

So I'm pretty new to this just started using custom roms yesterday only tried 2 so far.
now these 3 are the ones that have caught my attention. Currently I'm using bionix 1.4.1 seems good so far , I tried CM 7.1 but I had issues accessing my SD card storage it was either the internal data or the SD wouldn't let me access both.
now at first I just wanted something better than stock rom.. something more stable.. but now that I've gotten the hang of it and seen how easy it is to backup/restore/install a new rom is I kinda want something nice
Now I haven't tried the weapon yet because I see it was last updated 10/22/2011 now I don't know if its because developers simply went with another project orits just as stable as it can be.
I'm looking for opinions and advice on what are the best roms out there and what have you found the best working on your g2x and for what period of time.

With Weapon and Bionix, it all comes down to personal preference since they're both based of 2.3.3... But I prefer Bionic... CM is much faster and had wayyyy more features... I'd go with CM 7.2 RC 1.
Sent from my LG-P999 using xda premium

FatalityBoyZahy said:
With Weapon and Bionix, it all comes down to personal preference since they're both based of 2.3.3... But I prefer Bionic... CM is much faster and had wayyyy more features... I'd go with CM 7.2 RC 1.
Sent from my LG-P999 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree the 7.2 is blazing fast but I had issues with the gps I could not get it working

I just saw the Hellfire phoenix according to them its based on CM 7 can I expect it to be as good or any better?

deathskater said:
I just saw the Hellfire phoenix according to them its based on CM 7 can I expect it to be as good or any better?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Eh, it just has some extra tweaks and theming done to it... I prefer an untouched CM7 experience.

FatalityBoyZahy said:
Eh, it just has some extra tweaks and theming done to it... I prefer an untouched CM7 experience.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So I just gave CM 7.2 another try... my home button ain't working haha trying to find if there is a setting to set it... its weird... if anyone knows anything please let me know this is a bit messed up. I get the vibration that I'm pressing it but it doesn't do anything.

ok nvm that a quick reboot fixed this.. now I am having the same issue I can't acces my sd card once I set it to use my internal storage any ideas?

deathskater said:
ok nvm that a quick reboot fixed this.. now I am having the same issue I can't acces my sd card once I set it to use my internal storage any ideas?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So I noticed I can only access it by going through /mnt/emmc is there a way to make a shortcut for this so I don't have to manually input this to access this

Everything works great on Weapon, but it had some issues with JuoceDefender, so im using Hellfire now.
Hellfire is pretty solid build too, not that many bugs, I just recommend flashing Trinity if you're gonna use it though.
Sent from my LG-P999 using xda premium

NekoNyapii said:
Everything works great on Weapon, but it had some issues with JuoceDefender, so im using Hellfire now.
Hellfire is pretty solid build too, not that many bugs, I just recommend flashing Trinity if you're gonna use it though.
Sent from my LG-P999 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well I'm currently trying CM 7.2 at firt boot there where aa few dumb bugs but after I rebooted everything is working great been using it for about 3 hours non stop downloading apps playing games browing just testing and from 100% im at 78% right now .
Only issue I have is that I have to manually enter the directory of my external SD to access it from the file manager it can be used by all aplications though its odd so its a silly thing I can handle
scoring 2100-2400 on quadrant result varies for some reason every time I run it but for now I'm pleased with the CM 7.2 RC1 I might backup this one and check that hellfire one.

deathskater said:
I agree the 7.2 is blazing fast but I had issues with the gps I could not get it working
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Settings>location & security> GPS Source> Use internal GPS.
---------- Post added at 01:05 AM ---------- Previous post was at 12:49 AM ----------
deathskater said:
I just saw the Hellfire phoenix according to them its based on CM 7 can I expect it to be as good or any better?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hellfire Phoenix 2.1 is based of CM 7.2.0 RC1,.... and it rocks...
I always liked stock CM the best, because i was always about features and speed, not to much the looks. but hellfire is aw some!
some people try to call hell a baker, or just a themer.. but its not true..
sure he maby he started out that way. but he is fare beyond that now he is making very stable Rom's that look good! he is not taking eaglesblood Roms and making them prettier anymore, he is making his own Roms based off CM source (Phoenix) or directly from google source AOSP( hellfire sandwich 1.5)
so he is now in a class with the other developers that are making and baking their Rom's off other sources just like the other developers, any one that says otherwise obviously doesn't know the whole story.
any way CM is solid, to begin with,
and hell gave it more flavor!
hellfire rocks!

korny647 said:
Settings>location & security> GPS Source> Use internal GPS.
---------- Post added at 01:05 AM ---------- Previous post was at 12:49 AM ----------
Hellfire Phoenix 2.1 is based of CM 7.2.0 RC1,.... and it rocks...
I always liked stock CM the best, because i was always about features and speed, not to much the looks. but hellfire is aw some!
some people try to call hell a baker, or just a themer.. but its not true..
sure he maby he started out that way. but he is fare beyond that now he is making very stable Rom's that look good! he is not taking eaglesblood Roms and making them prettier anymore, he is making his own Roms based off CM source (Phoenix) or directly from google source AOSP( hellfire sandwich 1.5)
so he is now in a class with the other developers that are making and baking their Rom's off other sources just like the other developers, any one that says otherwise obviously doesn't know the whole story.
any way CM is solid, to begin with,
and hell gave it more flavor!
hellfire rocks!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Did I miss something? Isn't hfs a cm9 based build?
I only had 1.5 on my phone for a few min but I remember seeing cyanogenmod goodies.

r.snyder said:
Did I miss something? Isn't Hf's a cm9 based build?
I only had 1.5 on my phone for a few min but I remember seeing cyanogenmod goodies.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
you could be right... i thought the new 1.5 was based of AOSP, but maybe not, or maybe he cherry picked a couple things in there.
i might be getting it confused with the new build for eglsbld, which is deff AOSP..
but aether way its still a solid rom!!!
im still rocking Phoenix 2.1 until Hf's gets more stable.. but from what i can tell its still pretty stable as it is, but im going to wait for another release or two..

korny647 said:
you could be right... i thought the new 1.5 was based of AOSP, but maybe not, or maybe he cherry picked a couple things in there.
i might be getting it confused with the new build for eglsbld, which is deff AOSP..
but aether way its still a solid rom!!!
im still rocking Phoenix 2.1 until Hf's gets more stable.. but from what i can tell its still pretty stable as it is, but im going to wait for another release or two..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah I play with the ics builds until the bugs annoy me enough to send me back to gingerbread.
Its nice having all these options with all the activity in them. Constantly getting new ROMs to flash.

for sure

Well I'm about to install Hellfire phoenix to see how it is since it's based of cm 7.2 wich I'm liking its stability.
if there are any issues with hellfire that have dumb quickfixes or any advice on it let me know

I'm been reading about faux and stuff about kernels are these installed with the rom? or how does all of this work?
I do have stock backup in case something goes wrong with the phone I can return it to warranty.
But yeah I'm a total noob I'm here to learn currently waiting the 10 minutes for the hellfire phoenix.

So far so good I'm loving this Hellfire phoenix no issues with it yet and quadrant scoring 2700 CM7.2 didn't get past 2200 I like the looks on this a lot more hopefully its as stable as CM 7.2 only time will tell but definitively if it is it's a keeper.
Can someone confirm for me if wifi calling really does save battery?

I think it does personally, also I think the kernel you're on is the faux 123 DS driver which gives you weird battery readings but better battery by 2 hours in most cases...
Sent from my LG-P999 using xda premium

mt3g said:
I think it does personally, also I think the kernel you're on is the faux 123 DS driver which gives you weird battery readings but better battery by 2 hours in most cases...
Sent from my LG-P999 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
kernel is 2.6.32.56-cm7-faux123-049
I don't really care what I use as long as it doesn't damage my hardware of affect stability. and if better battery that would be nice
phone has been on battery I started with it 100% for 1 hour 7 minutes and it reads 95% battery I've been using it sort of frequently testing different things like camera, video playback, youtube setting how I want it downloading apps, music stuff like that nothing hard on it. but if it's reading it correctly... geez thats insanely good.
And Quadrant scored 2700... lol I was reading some kernels overclock the cpu I'm guessing this one does that? or its just that good? I have no clue I checked and it said 1017mhz so 1ghz witch is stock but I don't know if this throttles down or something like that.. again I'm not experienced at this.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

Advice after personal experience

I had Infuse with original Froyo for a while and heard wonderful things about Gingerbread (GB), how battery is much better and stuff.
So I waited for official GB upgrade and used standard way AT&T is doing upgrades.
Gingerbread was bad, freezes, reboots, etc. BTW, my wifes Atrix 2 works nice with GB and holds charge for two days. That was one of the reasons I believed in GB.
Since my GB was so bad I started to look here to get devices rooted and install something new and better.
Unfortunately nothing is better than original Froyo. Sorry guys, I do not understand what is so good in ICS or JellyBean? Can somebody list new features?
I'm using now CM10 8/8, my portable hotspot is not working, my battery is worth, my Bluetooth is having issues, my GPS was not working at all until 8/8 build and most of all I do not see any features of ICS or JB worth spending time installing it. And I did not even try to evaluate camera/video. According to some notes, HD video is having issues.
I am not new to technologies and I did all upgrades according to dev notes. This is just my experience and may help some new people save some time trying.
BTW 8/8 very laggy, changing screens slow, even if I put min cpu to 1200, gps shows satellites but I did not have enough time (waited 15 minutes) and did not get any sat locks.

bilihor said:
I had Infuse with original Froyo for a while and heard wonderful things about Gingerbread (GB), how battery is much better and stuff.
So I waited for official GB upgrade and used standard way AT&T is doing upgrades.
Gingerbread was bad, freezes, reboots, etc. BTW, my wifes Atrix 2 works nice with GB and holds charge for two days. That was one of the reasons I believed in GB.
Since my GB was so bad I started to look here to get devices rooted and install something new and better.
Unfortunately nothing is better than original Froyo. Sorry guys, I do not understand what is so good in ICS or JellyBean? Can somebody list new features?
I'm using now CM10 8/8, my portable hotspot is not working, my battery is worth, my Bluetooth is having issues, my GPS was not working at all until 8/8 build and most of all I do not see any features of ICS or JB worth spending time installing it. And I did not even try to evaluate camera/video. According to some notes, HD video is having issues.
I am not new to technologies and I did all upgrades according to dev notes. This is just my experience and may help some new people save some time trying.
BTW 8/8 very laggy, changing screens slow, even if I put min cpu to 1200, gps shows satellites but I did not have enough time (waited 15 minutes) and did not get any sat locks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well...obviously rooting/flashing roms isntt for you...you know its easy to go back to stock froyo...
And the whole point of ics/jb is staying up to date with the latest software...any true tech guy would want to flash ics/jb-regardless of the bugs
And that is your personal expierence about cm10 8/8...I got a GPS lock in less then a minute...and I have 0 lag
Imho opinion this thread is pointless...it clearly states in ops what doesnt work-just go back to froyo...its obvious that's what you want
Btw...wasn't trying to be rude...just stating my opinion
Sent from my HTC Holiday using Tapatalk 2

mg2195 said:
Well...obviously rooting/flashing roms isntt for you...you know its easy to go back to stock froyo...
And the whole point of ics/jb is staying up to date with the latest software...any true tech guy would want to flash ics/jb-regardless of the bugs
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I was like that 20 years ago, yeah, all new stuff, bugs? we can live with them. But this is point of view of a hacker. The ultimate goal is to make it work, not to make it work maybe. Does it make sense to just "stay with new technology, maybe" ?
I drifted from being hacker who makes cool things to make applications which work and feel great about it.
Most of the people just need their phone to work. Oh, yeah, you are texting now with JellyBean !

My one and a half cent:
IMHO For most people rooting and flashing is probably something they should not do. All they want is a functional phone that does phone things: text, make calls, check Facebook, etc. That is exactly what they get when their phone comes out of the box. That's great and awesome: don't worry, be happy.
There are others "hackers" or not, who like to tinker, figure out how things work, "try" and get them to work more efficiently, or "better". This includes those who are not as technical as the devs but are willing to help, test and report.
These people who are ready and willing to live with the fact that their expensive functional phone may end up as an expensive piece of plastic and metal...well root and flash away.
But to complain that your phone is worse after using someones hardwork and effort is pointless. Report problems yes...complain...not cool.
These boards are filled with complaints and cries for help from people who probably should have stuck with the phone they got from the store and just been happy. Rooting is not for everyone.
Peace
Sent from a de-FUNKt Infuse

bilihor said:
I had Infuse with original Froyo for a while and heard wonderful things about Gingerbread (GB), how battery is much better and stuff.
So I waited for official GB upgrade and used standard way AT&T is doing upgrades.
Gingerbread was bad, freezes, reboots, etc. BTW, my wifes Atrix 2 works nice with GB and holds charge for two days. That was one of the reasons I believed in GB.
Since my GB was so bad I started to look here to get devices rooted and install something new and better.
Unfortunately nothing is better than original Froyo. Sorry guys, I do not understand what is so good in ICS or JellyBean? Can somebody list new features?
.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Blasphemer! Heinous! Stone him!!
You don't like ways to break your phone?
You don't like to learn how to add a new APN?
You don't want to downgrade your 720p video to 480p?
- joking.
In several aspects, I agree with you re: FROYO. The Froyo phone does what it is suppose to do. Great cam/vid; GPS, mms and call. If you're not dying the the latest, it runs just fine. Froyo doesn't support Gtalk Video
I'm not sure about your experience with GB though. I've not seen the lags, freezes and reboots on the official firmware.
The main thing I recall from official GB is make sure you install it without a microSD in place and after it is installed, copy off all your stuff from the internal SDcard and do a factory reset under /setting/privacy.
Here a froyo treat for you:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=25526638&postcount=1
In December 2011, I wrote this thread. I thought it was pretty funny at the time. If you reflect on it, you may like the practical points I was making.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1397287

Forget, Froy, GB, ICS, JB...
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

qkster said:
Blasphemer! Heinous! Stone him!!
You don't like ways to break your phone?
You don't like to learn how to add a new APN?
You don't want to downgrade your 720p video to 480p?
- joking.
In several aspects, I agree with you re: FROYO. The Froyo phone does what it is suppose to do. Great cam/vid; GPS, mms and call. If you're not dying the the latest, it runs just fine. Froyo doesn't support Gtalk Video
I'm not sure about your experience with GB though. I've not seen the lags, freezes and reboots on the official firmware.
The main thing I recall from official GB is make sure you install it without a microSD in place and after it is installed, copy off all your stuff from the internal SDcard and do a factory reset under /setting/privacy.
Here a froyo treat for you:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=25526638&postcount=1
In December 2011, I wrote this thread. I thought it was pretty funny at the time. If you reflect on it, you may like the practical points I was making.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1397287
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
qkster that thread was Awesome! I had never read that before...hilarious
Sent from a de-FUNKt Infuse

Okay so maybe ICS and JB are not for you.. but what about GB ROMs like Emancipation and Aeon? Have you given them a try?
Stock is okay but it has too much room for improvement and that's where our brilliant devs come in. Believe in them and in their work. They are not here to turn phones into robots that will lead us to our doom
Sent from my sweet and buttery Infuse

bigjoe2675 said:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Joe, you keep that crap up and the mods might take your merit badges, along with your box of cookies and your bag of jelly beans!....lol :laugh:

PoXFreak said:
Joe, you keep that crap up and the mods might take your merit badges, along with your box of cookies and your bag of jelly beans!....lol :laugh:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wat?!?
Bigjoe slowly walking away....now running....gone....

bilihor said:
I was like that 20 years ago, yeah, all new stuff, bugs? we can live with them. But this is point of view of a hacker. The ultimate goal is to make it work, not to make it work maybe. Does it make sense to just "stay with new technology, maybe" ?
I drifted from being hacker who makes cool things to make applications which work and feel great about it.
Most of the people just need their phone to work. Oh, yeah, you are texting now with JellyBean !
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Please don't make this into one of those "I'm too old for this crap" debates. I might possibly be as old as you are, seeing as how I got my start on SCO Xenix way back when the 386DX25 was the processor to have.
Hell, I remember MS Windows 1.1! 6 black and white windows, the beginnings of multi-tasking...
All these people want, in essence, is a phone with the newest available software... that works. Thats why there is always someone working on some problem or "bug", trying and (99.9% of the time) succeeding. Sometimes we fail, but there is always someone else willing to pick up where we left off.
One reason I enjoy playing with firmware...; the challenge. I've always been one to take it apart and somehow make it better, regardless of what it is. A car, a radio, a computer... whatever.
On a side note, maybe reflashing your firmware will fix the issues your having with your Infuse now?

bigjoe2675 said:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
.... thought I read somewhere that pornographic images are not allowed on xda... :silly:

PoXFreak said:
Please don't make this into one of those "I'm too old for this crap" debates. I might possibly be as old as you are, seeing as how I got my start on SCO Xenix way back when the 386DX25 was the processor to have.
Hell, I remember MS Windows 1.1! 6 black and white windows, the beginnings of multi-tasking...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wow!!! You are old
Tandy 1000 here .... 5 1/4 floppy ... All DOS baby... Anyone? Anyone?
Sent from a de-FUNKt Infuse

bilihor said:
I had Infuse with original Froyo for a while and heard wonderful things about Gingerbread (GB), how battery is much better and stuff.
So I waited for official GB upgrade and used standard way AT&T is doing upgrades.
Gingerbread was bad, freezes, reboots, etc. BTW, my wifes Atrix 2 works nice with GB and holds charge for two days. That was one of the reasons I believed in GB.
Since my GB was so bad I started to look here to get devices rooted and install something new and better.
Unfortunately nothing is better than original Froyo. Sorry guys, I do not understand what is so good in ICS or JellyBean? Can somebody list new features?
I'm using now CM10 8/8, my portable hotspot is not working, my battery is worth, my Bluetooth is having issues, my GPS was not working at all until 8/8 build and most of all I do not see any features of ICS or JB worth spending time installing it. And I did not even try to evaluate camera/video. According to some notes, HD video is having issues.
I am not new to technologies and I did all upgrades according to dev notes. This is just my experience and may help some new people save some time trying.
BTW 8/8 very laggy, changing screens slow, even if I put min cpu to 1200, gps shows satellites but I did not have enough time (waited 15 minutes) and did not get any sat locks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
IDK, maybe you got the initial, buggy, official GB update? I jumped ship and flashed Zeus long before that. And it ran smoother and I got better battery life with it than stock Froyo.
And it's pretty clearly written in each thread what is being seen by folks using the ROMs. For the CM10 build, It's pretty well known that GPS had issues until 8/8. It's posted clearly that several folks had issues with trebuchet lagging, so they loaded an alternate launcher and got better results. It's posted that wifi hotspot doesn't work with WPA or WPA2 with the bcrmhd driver (think that's the specific driver) and disabling security will allow it to work.
I know there are 200+ pages on some of these ROM threads, and many of the posts are 'me too' 'OMG this is so cool' or 'WTF? Read the OP'. But there are useful nuggets of information in there, especially the OP, and you really need to read them all to know what you might see with that ROM, or at least to know 'oh, I'm not the only one with that problem, and here's how they fixed it.'
In short, don't be ready to jump to a ROM that's only been out a short time until you know that either the bugs are fixed or you can live with the bugs that have been reported. Believe it or not, there IS a reason it takes time for official updates to roll out too, and it's not just to piss everyone off.

Smokestack360 said:
Wow!!! You are old
Tandy 1000 here .... 5 1/4 floppy ... All DOS baby... Anyone? Anyone?
Sent from a de-FUNKt Infuse
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
.... my current rig
may consider an upgrade if the holiday deals are just right....
...only 11 more payments to bigjoe and she'll be all mine.

PoXFreak said:
Please don't make this into one of those "I'm too old for this crap" debates. I might possibly be as old as you are, seeing as how I got my start on SCO Xenix way back when the 386DX25 was the processor to have.
Hell, I remember MS Windows 1.1! 6 black and white windows, the beginnings of multi-tasking...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
fortran, basm, basic, dos 2.0, turbo pascal 3, IBM XT, PS/1 - those are times I started coding, circa 1987
(... deleted "politically incorrect" paragraph addressed not to you PoXFreak. I hate it here in US, people are always nice to each other, no matter what, or you will be called complainer ...)

bilihor said:
fortran, basm, basic, dos 2.0, turbo pascal 3, IBM XT, PS/1 - those are times I started coding, circa 1987
(... deleted "politically incorrect" paragraph addressed not to you PoXFreak. I hate it here in US, people are always nice to each other, no matter what, or you will be called complainer ...)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes...turbo pascal...I remember turbo pascal...or actually forgot turbo pascal. I couldn't code in that anymore to save my life
Sent from a de-FUNKt Infuse

Smokestack360 said:
Wow!!! You are old
Tandy 1000 here .... 5 1/4 floppy ... All DOS baby... Anyone? Anyone?
Sent from a de-FUNKt Infuse
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Timex Sinclair, cassette drive, b/w TV for a monitor... that was my first start. All BASIC language...
Sent from my SGH-I997 using xda app-developers app

PoXFreak said:
Timex Sinclair, cassette drive, b/w TV for a monitor... that was my first start. All BASIC language...
Sent from my SGH-I997 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Bunch of old farts in here...soon someone is gonna bust out old punchcards or even an abacus
Sent from a de-FUNKt Infuse

Smokestack360 said:
Wow!!! You are old
Tandy 1000 here .... 5 1/4 floppy ... All DOS baby... Anyone? Anyone?
Sent from a de-FUNKt Infuse
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I saw this in my great grandfather's office.
I'm not sure what it is.
I first PC was an Intel i7 quadcore 8gb RAM and 2tb drive.

[Q] Move to 4.2.2=> Performance?

On my Galaxy S III, I upgraded to 4.2.2, and realized much greater performance, and battery life.
I am quite tired of the quite slow performance on this TF101, and am curious if I will notice much better performance if I go to one of the 4.2.2 ROMs for this.
At the moment, I am on Revolution 3.6.

It's a shame that the forum doesn't have a search function where you could look at other people's results when they've moved to a 4.2.2 ROM.
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Xparent Purple Tapatalk 2

bsoplinger said:
It's a shame that the forum doesn't have a search function where you could look at other people's results when they've moved to a 4.2.2 ROM.
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Xparent Purple Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Now, don't you feel so much better, now that you were able to once again pound your chest and complain about someone possibly not searching. Conagrats to you.
I've read quite a few posts (I'll admit not the whole thread) in a couple 422 threads, and most of what there is people asking qustions about isssues they have etc.
You couuld have probably spent fewer words actually helping someone. I suppose you expect that someone with my post count does nothing but ask dumb questions and never searches.

ewingr said:
Now, don't you feel so much better, now that you were able to once again pound your chest and complain about someone possibly not searching. Conagrats to you.
I've read quite a few posts (I'll admit not the whole thread) in a couple 422 threads, and most of what there is people asking qustions about isssues they have etc.
You couuld have probably spent fewer words actually helping someone. I suppose you expect that someone with my post count does nothing but ask dumb questions and never searches.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The other guy didn't mean for you to MANUALLY search... but rather, use the search tool:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/sitesearch.php?q=tf101 4.2.2 faster
Returns a forum topic that discusses this very thing.
It's not like people are unfamiliar with search engines these days... so if you see people surprised/frustrated that they're not used more often, that would explain the first response to your original post.
At any rate, I personally use KatKiss (build 200) having started with EOS back in build 90 or so... and it's meant I've sadly had to hold off on buying a replacement to my TF101 because it performs nearly as well as newer hardware...

mak8tack said:
The other guy didn't mean for you to MANUALLY search... but rather, use the search tool:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm sure that is the case. But making smart, sarcastic remarks to people is of no help to anyone. I too find posts that are easily found with search. But I don't wise off. I either ignore it altogether with no answer, or answer it, and then suggest searches in a friencly way,as you did. Much more community friendly, as I find you are, and appreciation is a result instead of anger.
Actually, I find that Google searches, outside of the XDA search, are much better.
mak8tack said:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/sitesearch.php?q=tf101 4.2.2 faster
Returns a forum topic that discusses this very thing.
It's not like people are unfamiliar with search engines these days... so if you see people surprised/frustrated that they're not used more often, that would explain the first response to your original post.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I looked at your search. It returned much of what I had looked at, many of which compare various 4.2.2 ROMS. I am interested in knowing if 422 really is appreciably faster than stock. Or, if the tablet is just too low powered, and should be looking for new hardware.
mak8tack said:
At any rate, I personally use KatKiss (build 200) having started with EOS back in build 90 or so... and it's meant I've sadly had to hold off on buying a replacement to my TF101 because it performs nearly as well as newer hardware...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Great. That is what I was interested in hearing. I appreciate your answering the question. I guess I'll give it a go.
I see you are new...at least with a new ID. I had the honor of giving you your first Thanks on the Thanks Meter

I too am using KatKiss 220 just recently. Believe me, once you're running it you'll be surprised on what you're missing compared to stock. You'd usually think it would be underpowered by getting 4.2.2 but the devs made a great job in tailoring these custom ROMS to the TF101. On KatKiss 220, everything felt much smoother, speakers are louder, and you get ton's of added customizations and boost options

ospen06 said:
I too am using KatKiss 220 just recently. Believe me, once you're running it you'll be surprised on what you're missing compared to stock. You'd usually think it would be underpowered by getting 4.2.2 but the devs made a great job in tailoring these custom ROMS to the TF101. On KatKiss 220, everything felt much smoother, speakers are louder, and you get ton's of added customizations and boost options
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks so much. I'm going to start my backup process, and get the conversion going. In case anyone else is curious about this, I'll post back my impressions and experience once done.

Performance of TF101 running 4.2.2?
ewingr said:
Thanks so much. I'm going to start my backup process, and get the conversion going. In case anyone else is curious about this, I'll post back my impressions and experience once done.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi! Did you mange to install 4.2.2? How's the performance?
Even I am on ARHD 3.6 and want to move to 4.2.2 ROM.
I've tried both CM No-Name nightlies and Team EOS 4 ROMs but switched back to ARHD ROM primarily because the performance wasn't 'butter' smooth and the sound was very low compared to ICS ROMs..
There is a KAT App for fixing the sound, and it works quite well too; but I faced this nagging problem after using that KAT App to increase the sound that whenever I was trying to decrease the sound, it was automatically switching back to full sound.
Would like to know your experience with this ROM? Is this ROM is any better? And whether the sound is as good as.. or comparable to what it is on ICS ROMs.

kishangoyal said:
Hi! Did you mange to install 4.2.2? How's the performance?
Even I am on ARHD 3.6 and want to move to 4.2.2 ROM.
I've tried both CM No-Name nightlies and Team EOS 4 ROMs but switched back to ARHD ROM primarily because the performance wasn't 'butter' smooth and the sound was very low compared to ICS ROMs..
There is a KAT App for fixing the sound, and it works quite well too; but I faced this nagging problem after using that KAT App to increase the sound that whenever I was trying to decrease the sound, it was automatically switching back to full sound.
Would like to know your experience with this ROM? Is this ROM is any better? And whether the sound is as good as.. or comparable to what it is on ICS ROMs.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I moved from stock to TeamEOS about 6 months ago now, have now progressed to Katkiss 221.
The improvement has been immense, my TF101 runs pretty much as quickly as my wife's Nexus 7.
My advice would be to go for it.

kishangoyal said:
Hi! Did you mange to install 4.2.2? How's the performance?
Even I am on ARHD 3.6 and want to move to 4.2.2 ROM.
I've tried both CM No-Name nightlies and Team EOS 4 ROMs but switched back to ARHD ROM primarily because the performance wasn't 'butter' smooth and the sound was very low compared to ICS ROMs..
There is a KAT App for fixing the sound, and it works quite well too; but I faced this nagging problem after using that KAT App to increase the sound that whenever I was trying to decrease the sound, it was automatically switching back to full sound.
Would like to know your experience with this ROM? Is this ROM is any better? And whether the sound is as good as.. or comparable to what it is on ICS ROMs.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I installed it last night. Have not had much time to play with it. But initial observation is that it appears to be much faster. After the initial test (only launching Chrome and a small bit of browsing), I upped the CPU Max to 1200. Haven't had any time since.
But, I'm thinking it was worth the effort.

What about the sound?
mattgren said:
I moved from stock to TeamEOS about 6 months ago now, have now progressed to Katkiss 221.
The improvement has been immense, my TF101 runs pretty much as quickly as my wife's Nexus 7.
My advice would be to go for it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Okay! Now you've got me curious. I'll download the ROM tonight and give it a spin.
What about the sound? Is it loud enough? Umm.. as good as in ARHD /stock ICS?
I'm emphasizing on sound coz I use the tablet to play music almost all the time and it is a make or break factor for me
Thanks for the suggestion, I'll surely try this ROM

kishangoyal said:
Okay! Now you've got me curious. I'll download the ROM tonight and give it a spin.
What about the sound? Is it loud enough? Umm.. as good as in ARHD /stock ICS?
I'm emphasizing on sound coz I use the tablet to play music almost all the time and it is a make or break factor for me
Thanks for the suggestion, I'll surely try this ROM
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Using KAT Android toolbox to boost the volume it's plenty loud enough for me (but I'm getting old...)

Now up to KatKiss 223 - feels lightning fast even without overclocking

Moved to KatKiss few days ago and its a HUGE difference from stock ROM, even moving from moded 4.0.3 is a big difference.
Sent from my Transformer TF101 using XDA Premium HD app

Put the EOS 4 rom with kat kernel @ 1.60GHz and your TF101 fly highh
Best rom i've tested in my TF101 ! :laugh: :good:
My TF101 w/ some Xperia Tablet Z Style :
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}