Database Info

List of Cooked ROMs?

This is my 3rd post ever here, so please be gentle.
Crogon said:
I can't seem to find it now, but didn't there used to be a list of pre-cooked ROMs here somewhere?
I think what I'm aiming at is a fully patched / hacked 6.1 HTC ROM with everything fixed and no bugs. Preferably minus any bloatware. If it has recommended utilities pre-installed great, if not, no big loss. Did they ever finish hacking a video driver together? I lost track of that thread, and can't seem to find any current info.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Update: I found a tidbit somewhere that says the newest video driver updates should be cooked into the newest ROMs.. but how do I figure out which ones have all the bug patches and hacks installed, and etc. like I mentioned above? I know there USED to be a list of pre-cooked ROMs, but I can't find it now.
Hmm.. Am I maybe thinking of a list of pre-cooked ROMs for the Wing, or some other HTC? If I am, I'm DEFINITELY going to need some ROM recommendations.
Here are my stats, if it helps any:
rom version 3.57.502.2 WWE
rom date 7/17/08
radio version: 1.65.21.18
protocol version: 25.88.40.05H
tri-color screen
KAIS1*0
SPL-3.56.Hard
CPLD-8
.
.
Serial
image version 3.57.502.2
R 1.65.21.18
G 25.88.40.05H
D 3.57.00.00
Thanks again for any help!

if u really want a good cooked rom i suggest you try Garmins roms....they have the latest htc drivers built in...
thats all i can say

mazin13 said:
if u really want a good cooked rom i suggest you try Garmins roms....they have the latest htc drivers built in...
thats all i can say
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
he DOESN'T WANT a cooked rom he is looking for a pre-cooked rom.
@op did you check the kaiser wiki or htc's website?? 'cuz that is where you will find all the latest roms for your device that aren't cooked by a chef.

Also, look around for mbavrian's Kitchen Elements.
The "Base ROMs" on which our Chefs makes their gourmet meals are difficult to locate. Some chefs refuse to share like little playground children.
Others, Like NotATreoFan, have released their base for other people to use to make ROMs. Great Contributors.

Woops!
I guess I stated that incorrectly. Sorry!!
Actually I DO want a custom 'Cooked' ROM. My main purpose of reflashing the ROM is to get rid of all known bugs and bloatware. So I WANT all the custom registry hacks and patches to make everything run smoothly. I want the hacked video drivers (as they appear to currently be stable) and etc..
SO.. I'm looking for:
1) 6.1 OS with fast drivers and all known hacks and patches to have as few bugs as possible. UNLESS 6.1 has introduced some known bugs that can't be fixed (wouldn't surprise me with an MS product). IF there's a bug free FASTER version 5 OS, that will run on the Tilt, I'll be happy with that. One time I installed Win95 on a 1.6Ghz T-bird. Power on to fully loaded desktop was like 2 seconds flat.
2) bloatware removed so as to free up space, and I assume cleaning crap out of the registry wouldn't hurt with speed. Is there a system cache, and would it be beneficial to move it to the SD card? I've read that moving the IE cache to the SD card is asking for trouble, not sure that there's a concensus on that or if it's just opinion though.
OK.. that's going to get confusing. Scratch that and start over:
1) All known bugs hacked or patched.
2) All known speed enhancements (that don't compromise system integrity).
3) Rip out MS (or HTC ..or both?) crapware that COULD be replaced with faster / more functional counterparts.
4) Optional: pre-installed or at least packaged (cab?) applications to enhance functionality. My priority in applications is utility enhancement. Example: I can download 200 Flash / Java / MAME games to the SIM card some day if I get bored, don't need it in the OS. However, if there's a remedial photo editing utility that will allow me to edit my pics before I upload them somewhere, I want it.
I did manage to stumble across a wiki page last night: http://wiki.xda-developers.com/index.php?pagename=Kaiser_Cooked_ROMs
32 Developers and countless ROMs without any comparison isn't much help though. Can I assume all current ROMs are posted there?
Browsing through them, I recall that Alex's ROMs used to be the last word in ROMs, apparently dutty's were until he switched gears. HyperDragon seems to be terribly popular at the moment, but popular doesn't mean better.
I suppose I could try to gather all the available info into a giant spreadsheet, but the fact that about half the ROMs link out to a feature list is slightly discouraging. I think dutty's list of registry hacks ends in '.. and a bunch of other stuff I forgot', which is TERRIBLY discouraging (when trying to compare features).
Anyway, sorry if I'm rambling on here. Please don't take anything I'm saying as judgemental, I'm sort of thinking out loud trying to decide how best to proceed.
Say, has anybody considered building a CVS tree of sorts? I don't suppose you could have actual CODE stored in a repository without violating some sort of copyright or reverse engineering crap.. but a list of known code changes and etc. would seem to be a good idea. Since neither MS nor HTC has stepped up to the plate over the years, due to corporate greed, some sort of XDA-Dev code change tracking system seems like 'the last best hope' to get a decent OS. Ever.
That's why I'm jumping ship to try out the G1 after this. I don't believe MS will ever invest the effort to give us a 'business class' reliable bug free solution. ..let alone one that's innovative or even exceptional. They're style would lead me to expect them to wait till we have 800mhz handhelds, then 'patch' over top of everything they don't like to make it appear to behave better. ..and of course they would deem it necessary to add another programming layer to the OS to 'increase functionality' (read: bog down the OS).
Yup.. I'm definitely babbling now, so I'll just cut myself short.
I guess my bottom line questions are, Is there a more complete list of ROMs anywhere I should be using? ..or one which already compares all the features, so I don't have to?
Better yet, Is there a ROM build specifically to fit what I'm looking for? I seem to recall Alex's were built somewhat similar, but the newest one is quite old now. Hmm.. there is no Windows Mobile revision list is there? I have no way of knowing which older versions would be good, and when bug patches were introduced and etc.
Oh well, guess there's nothing to do but dive in head first and start putting together the best feature list I can with what resources I have.
Thanks for any help! ..and if you read this whole thing, thanks for putting up with my rambling, lol.

Crogon said:
I guess my bottom line questions are, Is there a more complete list of ROMs anywhere I should be using? ..or one which already compares all the features, so I don't have to?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've never seen one and I don't believe one exists. You'll just have to do your own research.

Crogon said:
I guess I stated that incorrectly. Sorry!!
Actually I DO want a custom 'Cooked' ROM. My main purpose of reflashing the ROM is to get rid of all known bugs and bloatware. So I WANT all the custom registry hacks and patches to make everything run smoothly. I want the hacked video drivers (as they appear to currently be stable) and etc..
SO.. I'm looking for:
1) 6.1 OS with fast drivers and all known hacks and patches to have as few bugs as possible. UNLESS 6.1 has introduced some known bugs that can't be fixed (wouldn't surprise me with an MS product). IF there's a bug free FASTER version 5 OS, that will run on the Tilt, I'll be happy with that. One time I installed Win95 on a 1.6Ghz T-bird. Power on to fully loaded desktop was like 2 seconds flat.
2) bloatware removed so as to free up space, and I assume cleaning crap out of the registry wouldn't hurt with speed. Is there a system cache, and would it be beneficial to move it to the SD card? I've read that moving the IE cache to the SD card is asking for trouble, not sure that there's a concensus on that or if it's just opinion though.
OK.. that's going to get confusing. Scratch that and start over:
1) All known bugs hacked or patched.
2) All known speed enhancements (that don't compromise system integrity).
3) Rip out MS (or HTC ..or both?) crapware that COULD be replaced with faster / more functional counterparts.
4) Optional: pre-installed or at least packaged (cab?) applications to enhance functionality. My priority in applications is utility enhancement. Example: I can download 200 Flash / Java / MAME games to the SIM card some day if I get bored, don't need it in the OS. However, if there's a remedial photo editing utility that will allow me to edit my pics before I upload them somewhere, I want it.
I did manage to stumble across a wiki page last night: http://wiki.xda-developers.com/index.php?pagename=Kaiser_Cooked_ROMs
32 Developers and countless ROMs without any comparison isn't much help though. Can I assume all current ROMs are posted there?
Browsing through them, I recall that Alex's ROMs used to be the last word in ROMs, apparently dutty's were until he switched gears. HyperDragon seems to be terribly popular at the moment, but popular doesn't mean better.
I suppose I could try to gather all the available info into a giant spreadsheet, but the fact that about half the ROMs link out to a feature list is slightly discouraging. I think dutty's list of registry hacks ends in '.. and a bunch of other stuff I forgot', which is TERRIBLY discouraging (when trying to compare features).
Anyway, sorry if I'm rambling on here. Please don't take anything I'm saying as judgemental, I'm sort of thinking out loud trying to decide how best to proceed.
Say, has anybody considered building a CVS tree of sorts? I don't suppose you could have actual CODE stored in a repository without violating some sort of copyright or reverse engineering crap.. but a list of known code changes and etc. would seem to be a good idea. Since neither MS nor HTC has stepped up to the plate over the years, due to corporate greed, some sort of XDA-Dev code change tracking system seems like 'the last best hope' to get a decent OS. Ever.
That's why I'm jumping ship to try out the G1 after this. I don't believe MS will ever invest the effort to give us a 'business class' reliable bug free solution. ..let alone one that's innovative or even exceptional. They're style would lead me to expect them to wait till we have 800mhz handhelds, then 'patch' over top of everything they don't like to make it appear to behave better. ..and of course they would deem it necessary to add another programming layer to the OS to 'increase functionality' (read: bog down the OS).
Yup.. I'm definitely babbling now, so I'll just cut myself short.
I guess my bottom line questions are, Is there a more complete list of ROMs anywhere I should be using? ..or one which already compares all the features, so I don't have to?
Better yet, Is there a ROM build specifically to fit what I'm looking for? I seem to recall Alex's were built somewhat similar, but the newest one is quite old now. Hmm.. there is no Windows Mobile revision list is there? I have no way of knowing which older versions would be good, and when bug patches were introduced and etc.
Oh well, guess there's nothing to do but dive in head first and start putting together the best feature list I can with what resources I have.
Thanks for any help! ..and if you read this whole thing, thanks for putting up with my rambling, lol.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You have to spend some time and TRY each ROM and see which one is suited for you.
Again, READ and spend time.
Read WIKI especially.
There is no 100% perfect ROM even if it is official one.

Crogon said:
I guess my bottom line questions are, Is there a more complete list of ROMs anywhere I should be using?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://wiki.xda-developers.com/index.php?pagename=Kaiser_Cooked_ROMs
If you want a newest list, you are always welcome to Update the wiki

I'm heading for the aspirin bottle just now. I spent like 3 hours reformatting the info on the wiki page into a spreadsheet.. when I discovered that some of the authors are still releasing, but it's not on the list!
AAHHH!!
So basically, A full up to date list is needed. Let alone version comparisons or features and bug fix lists.
Good grief.
No wonder most people opt to install ROMs randomly till they happen across one they like.
.. I think I'll make a new wiki page eventually. Something along the lines of a Kaiser ROM Feature Comparison page.
Do I get a XDA-Dev decoder ring if I actually finish it? lol

Proposal for mod rom versioning

One of the big issues I have noticed is that there is no rationale behind the version number assignment for a lot of the mod firmware. There are different modders using their own versioning, and there isn't even a hint of what version of android they are using, so we have things like;
"KiNgxKxROM Version 1.1r1"
"The Official Blur - Hero-V1.5.7 by Drizzy"
"JACxHEROSkiv2.2"
"CyanogenMod 4.1.11.1"
*** these all have the same problem... what version of android do they correspond to? How new IS each one of them?
I would like to propose a new standard to be adopted by everyone.
name-officialversion-modversion.
Of the form i.e.
"superxmod-1.6.DRC83-0.1.0.0"
***WHERE the modversion RESETS TO ZERO each time the official version increases, so for example, "CyanogenMod 4.1.11.1" should be called "CyanogenMod-1.6.DRC63-0.1.11.1".
* this will allow the user to immediately know where this rom comes from in terms of the official android versions and approximately how old it is.

I do my best
I do my best ... with the "limited space" we're given for Thread Titles on the forum.
~enom~

I support this though I find it unnecessary. The new beginner user will most likely READ atleast the first post of the thread and they will know what the ROM is based off of. The end user will of course know to read the thread before doing any flashing of any kind so organizing mod rom versioning isn't a necessity. It's convienent but not necessary

I support this because it would make ROM catalogs easier to build, which would benefit the whole community.

why not just post what android version the rom is based on in the first post. First post should always hold the most info anyways.

Since this thread hasn't been moved from the Dev section so far.
+1 for the versioning.
Also, how about we all stick to one benchmarking app (or is there any one app that we CAN rely on)
to test performance of ROMs, so that there's an objective way of figuring out
whether the latest frankenROM (thanks devs! ) is faster than X or Y?
Benchmark Pi has a score that's difficult to figure out, seeing as it throws up an
awesome number on a fairly sluggish HERO whereas the score for a fast-as-light
cyan ROM is way way worse. I know that Benchmark Pi isn't the answer,
not by a long shot. So is there a better alternative out there?
I'm tired of posts that go "THIS IS WAY FASTER! THANKS!" only to find
that the supposed speed increase is more rooted in perception than in
reality.
We need definitive numbers for ModelNumber+ROMVersion+CC/SwapSettings combinations.
Any help?

alritewhadeva said:
The end user will of course know to read the thread before doing any flashing of any kind
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
rofl. Funniest thing i've read all week.

+1
how about shorthand naming such as
for example:
CyanogenMod = CM-AOSP1.6r1-v4.20

If you're talking about cyanogen mod, you might want to add a couple more zeroes at the end. Anyway, I had proposed this too a while ago. I like your format, and I'll go one better; let's do cook-androidVersion-buildVersion-feature.bugfix
for example, the build I made this morning would be "jm-1.6-Donut eng.jubeh.20090930.070211-0.0"
jm is what I use for my builds (short for jubehMod)
1.6 is the current android branch (as per build.prop, no 1.6_r1 yet)
Donut eng.jubeh.20090930.070211 is the build number the compiler assigned to my build, people who work off of modding factory releases or build for dream_open are the ones who usually come up with things like CRC or DRC etc, I build for "AOSP for Dream" (it's a new "vendor" added)
first 0 is feature number, at this point my build is nothing but stock AOSP donut, no Google apps, no a2sd, no netfilter, no compcache, no bfs, just stock donut, so say I were to add a2sd, then I'd go up to 1, as I would have added one or more features (and this would be listed at the change log), basically, anything added that improves the build (and that's not a fix) is a +1 to feature
second 0 is bugfix. For example, right now my build works correctly in every sense, but I have a problem with the video camera where video is of very poor quality (real problem, I'm trying to figure it out), so say i get it fixed, then my bugfix number would go up 1, so basically, anything changed in the build strictly because it didn't work as intended is a bugfix
the last two numbers would be allowed to go past 9, so no more pressures to add .1s at the end like cyanogen was doing to prevent jumping to build # 4.2

karthikjr said:
+1 for the versioning.
Also, how about we all stick to one benchmarking app (or is there any one app that we CAN rely on)
to test performance of ROMs, so that there's an objective way of figuring out
whether the latest frankenROM (thanks devs! ) is faster than X or Y?
Benchmark Pi has a score that's difficult to figure out, seeing as it throws up an
awesome number on a fairly sluggish HERO whereas the score for a fast-as-light
cyan ROM is way way worse. I know that Benchmark Pi isn't the answer,
not by a long shot. So is there a better alternative out there?
I'm tired of posts that go "THIS IS WAY FASTER! THANKS!" only to find
that the supposed speed increase is more rooted in perception than in
reality.
We need definitive numbers for ModelNumber+ROMVersion+CC/SwapSettings combinations.
Any help?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yes just bench mark. its much better than benchmark pi only test the cpu really

by the way, I've been saving pretty much all roms that have been posted here (notable exceptions are haykuro's, jf's, and theduded's roms, I haven't been here THAT long) and I have them all saved on my computer separated by /cook/build/ for the Dream roms and /build/cook/ for the Hero ports. I guess I could run a quick filesystem lister and upload that list for people to see so they can sort of get an idea what mod release corresponds to what build

Here we go, I had to upload it inside a zip because of the stupid 2kb limitation on text files (this is 10kb)

lbcoder said:
One of the big issues I have noticed is that there is no rationale behind the version number assignment for a lot of the mod firmware. There are different modders using their own versioning, and there isn't even a hint of what version of android they are using, so we have things like;
"KiNgxKxROM Version 1.1r1"
"The Official Blur - Hero-V1.5.7 by Drizzy"
"JACxHEROSkiv2.2"
"CyanogenMod 4.1.11.1"
*** these all have the same problem... what version of android do they correspond to? How new IS each one of them?
I would like to propose a new standard to be adopted by everyone.
name-officialversion-modversion.
Of the form i.e.
"superxmod-1.6.DRC83-0.1.0.0"
***WHERE the modversion RESETS TO ZERO each time the official version increases, so for example, "CyanogenMod 4.1.11.1" should be called "CyanogenMod-1.6.DRC63-0.1.11.1".
* this will allow the user to immediately know where this rom comes from in terms of the official android versions and approximately how old it is.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
................................

Hi jubeh,
Thanks, this kind of cataloging is exactly why the OP's suggestion will be helpful.

karthikjr said:
We need definitive numbers for ModelNumber+ROMVersion+CC/SwapSettings combinations.
Any help?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm not so sure that we do...
I think that that should be more of a "details" thing.
Maybe we can go with "name-officialversion-modversion[-custom]" (square braces mean optional). Name might be a good place to keep modelnumber (I assume you mean by that "dream", "magic", "hero", etc.),
i.e.: supercustomrom(DREAM)-1.6r1-0.0.0.0.0.0.0.1-cc_swap_a2sd

Bug on a wap site in Eclair

Hi,
I'm very happy to see all those nice 2.1 ROMs out there, but there is a bug in Eclair from release 2.0 which prevents me to update, because it is really annoying for me little frenchie living in Paris (I'm not alone). I use a lot a wap site giving a lot of informations about transports : wap.ratp.fr
For some reason this site doesn't display correctly in Eclair.
I submitted an issue on Android tracker describing the problem : (ID: 5768. new user I can't post link....)
As I don't think Google will take a look at this in a near future, I'd like to be able to understand more and eventually make a fix which can be included in community ROMs. The problem seems to come from webkit as far as I can understand.
As I don't know well Android internals, what is the best way to look more deeply into the bug ? Is there a way to compile AOSP running in emulator in debug mode or something to track where the problem occurs precisely ?
Thx for your help

[Q]Smart Dialing

Hello guys,
I have a short question for you!
I noticed that in custom roms, developers do not include a smart dialer (with predictive keyboard etc), and when asking about that feature, answers are "download xy apk that do the trick".
However, some manufacturers provide such a feature with their devices, such as HTC with Sense, Samsung with TouchWizz, and... Even ZTE, at least in its Blade. (don't know about other models of that brand)
And I believe (I might be wrong) that ZTE Blade is provided with basic Android OS, no overlayer of any kind.
By the way, the dialer is almost the same than the one in CyanogemMod's roms, as well as the Sony Ericsson devices, and Nexus phones.
Here is my question:
Is it that difficult to implement the smart feature in the phone application, or is just that I represent a tiny minority of users who want that feature, instead of pressing "menu", "research", or scroll down over all the contacts?
(I must say that I know absolutely nothing about development, ... But it's just a question, no animosity! )

I don't know about other ROMs, but I CM7 is basically an ASOP build. The goal is to get as close to the stock android from Google (like on the Nexus phones), so they just use the stock apps.
The manufactures put these special features on their phones (HTC Sense, Motoblur, etc) to try and differentiate their brands of Android each other and get you to buy their phones over the competition.

Thank you for this answer.
I agree with you when you say that CM (for example) get as close as possible to the stock Android, but they also add special functionalities, specific applications etc..
So, why does it seem like it's not possible to add such a basic feature (by basic, I mean "That every smartphone should have, to my opinion" that is the smart dialing?
Is it because it is very difficult to implement to the dialer, or is it something completely different? There are many very talentuous people here on xda, I can't imagine that no one ever succeded, if they tried!

Dynavin D99+ Android new kernel for GB or ICS ?

Hey there.
I have this Device now a few months.
ht tp: // www . dynavin . com / android.php
Its called D99+
The Device works on Android 2.2.3 for further informations please ask me.
I have rooted it with a custom rom from this thread: ht tp: // forum . e46fanatics . com / showthread.php ? t=909077
Is there any possibility to upgrade to Gingerbread or ICS ? The guy who works on the custom roms says, we need a new kernel. Dynavin.com doesnt gives any sources etc.
Does anybody from you have the possibility to create a new kernel for this device, so i can install ginger or ics on it? Froyo is so annoying
I even would pay for a good working solution (kernel + - custom rom) !
Anybody can help me please?
Greetings from germany
Chris
P.S.: Cant add direct links. Sorry.

I really wish this device could get some xda love... froyo sucks.

i agree.. 2.2.3 is way to old!

If any dev was willing to put some work into this I would be willing to offer up some start up cash and some cash upon completion, maybe we can start a pool?
This device is horribly behind software wise. They did a great job making it look the part, but functionally its near useless for someone even alittle bit into the audio side.
My main gripes, lack of EQ controls, an android side that worked reliably. a better bluetooth interface (even if this went through the android side that would be fine); and a few other small things. Just the flow and feel of the device isnt "fluid"
If any devs need a device to work on, I could probably work something out to send my headunit to you for testing as well..