Here the results of my i9103 benchmarks with:
quadrant
smartbench
antutu
Click pictures to see them bigger.
err...what do you want us do with these stats?
overclock to 1.3Ghz?
Darkside Agent said:
err...what do you want us do with these stats?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
For what we do Benchmarks?
To look at them.
Why this is called S2? It sits perfectly between S and S2 specs wise.
legion1911 said:
For what we do Benchmarks?
To look at them.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
benchmarks are a crap waste of time - they dont give a true reflection (did you run each one 4-5 times before screenshotting? - thats about the closest you will get to a relevant score)
And you have posted screenshots for a i9103...this forum is for the i9100...so, what are you expecting to gain with this thread?
ambar_hitman said:
Why this is called S2? It sits perfectly between S and S2 specs wise.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Did you look at the benchmark?
It is much much faster then S. And even faster then S2.
That's because you over clocked it, If I did the same with my S2 yours wouldn't stand a chance.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
So what? No oc and CM7, benchmark is just ****
avocco said:
That's because you over clocked it, If I did the same with my S2 yours wouldn't stand a chance.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not true. In games and in particular in games optimized for Tegra II (those from www.tegrazone.com) the i9103 is faster then SII also without overclock.
Dude why do you keep posting it in S II thread? Are you so naive and think that you're gonna impress anybody here? I also own i9103, but we've got no chance in benchmarks against them.
First of all they have custom roms which affects benchmark score pretty much. For us slower stock is everything we can get. We can compete only in terms of gaming. Otherwise sorry we're slower. There's no need for childish competition.
m.kochan10 said:
Dude why do you keep posting it in S II thread?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
In the benchmark it is compared to i9100 so to post it here is appropriate.
Do we have a i9103 forum? No.
To post a benchmark is not childish.
"For us slower stock is everything we can get." WTF are you writing? The fact that we do not have custom ROMs yet does not mean we will not get them in the future. Market presentation of the Galaxy R in Germany was this week! We are much newer.
Tegra 2 is already known to be slower than exynos.......benchmarks give an idea but not always/rarely true real world performance.
Your games are optimized but exynos still runs them pretty flawlessly.
legion1911 said:
In the benchmark it is compared to i9100 so to post it here is appropriate.
Do we have a i9103 forum? No.
To post a benchmark is not childish.
"For us slower stock is everything we can get." WTF are you writing? The fact that we do not have custom ROMs yet does not mean we will not get them in the future. Market presentation of the Galaxy R in Germany was this week! We are much newer.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
OMG dude chill out and read between the lines, I meant that sgs2 has everything right now while we just have stock roms. That's why all benchmarks have no sense right now. Sgs2 has custom roms, kernels originally faster processor, while the one oc kernel is everything we've got now. See the difference? Be less emotional and more rational. It was really stupid to interprete my post that we won't ever get any aftermarket development, seriously.
And I'm sorry about little too offensive form, I didn't mean to offend you.
Sent from my GT-I9103 using XDA App
legion1911 said:
In the benchmark it is compared to i9100 so to post it here is appropriate.
Do we have a i9103 forum? No.
To post a benchmark is not childish.
"For us slower stock is everything we can get." WTF are you writing? The fact that we do not have custom ROMs yet does not mean we will not get them in the future. Market presentation of the Galaxy R in Germany was this week! We are much newer.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Run a cf bench and linpack.
And you'll see who is faster.
Also, your score is low at antutu. 8050 here.
Run a nenamark 2 bench too.
Caps at 60 fps here.
Mali 400 is a way more powerful than Tegra 2. You'll see it by yourself.
Sent from HydrOG3N MOD S2.
Technology Evolves, Android Evolves.
HydrOG3N is THE Revolution.
Yes, but you gotta remember that SGR's processor is originally 1 ghz, while SGS2 is equipped with 1,2 ghz (or even 1,5 without OC - correct me if I'm wrong) processor. Thus we need to use oc kernel (set cpu least to 1,2 mhz) to start a fair competition.
When I tested 1,2 ghz on CF bench I got slightly better results that sgs2.
Hold on to your horses tegra boys.Your CPU might appear faster in *some* benchmarks because it's built with a 40nm die as opposed to our 45nm die in the Exynos.That is good and all and you can brag about it,but the Tegra 2 is missing on something really crucial.NEON instructions.And NEON does make a difference.So sorry,but comparing the I9100 to the I9103 is unfair for you.We have the upper hand,live with it.
Also,chech Anandtech's review of the SGS2.The Mali MP-400 beats the Tegra 2's CPU by leaps and bounds in clock for clock performance.You have games optimized for your platform?Right...Check them running on the Mali.There is where the games show their potential.
Again sorry,but no,the Tegra is in no perceivable way better than the Exynos.
Thank you for informative post. I'm truly aware that Exynos is supreme in this comparison and I do not argue about that. I don't see point for competition, and that's what I meant, when I call it "childish". I didn't mean anything personal, but I knew it would end up like that "we against them" "tegra boys against Exynos boys" which I do consider totally unnecessary. There's no competition, it's nonsense. Our chipsets are absolute world's top products and that's all. Exynos has overall better performance. I'm ok about that, because tegra2 is still nothing to be ashamed.
m.kochan10 said:
Thank you for informative post. I'm truly aware that Exynos is supreme in this comparison and I do not argue about that. I don't see point for competition, and that's what I meant, when I call it "childish". I didn't mean anything personal, but I knew it would end up like that "we against them" "tegra boys against Exynos boys" which I do consider totally unnecessary. There's no competition, it's nonsense. Our chipsets are absolute world's top products and that's all. Exynos has overall better performance. I'm ok about that, because tegra2 is still nothing to be ashamed.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Chill out dude,it wasn't meant for you.Nor do I want to start some "we against them" kind of bull****.It was just a direct answer to the guy who came to our forums to bully us.
The Tegra 2 is one hell of a chipset,no one can doubt that.But better things have come out and it's past its prime,as Exynos will be in a few months time.It has its flaws,it's older.End of story.I just don't want some pricks to act so offensively when they can't actually.Plus,we shouldn't get all emotional-they are just gadgets after all.
tolis626 said:
Chill out dude,it wasn't meant for you.Nor do I want to start some "we against them" kind of bull****.It was just a direct answer to the guy who came to our forums to bully us.
The Tegra 2 is one hell of a chipset,no one can doubt that.But better things have come out and it's past its prime,as Exynos will be in a few months time.It has its flaws,it's older.End of story.I just don't want some pricks to act so offensively when they can't actually.Plus,we shouldn't get all emotional-they are just gadgets after all.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Dude I'm chilled I didn't take your post offensive. No problem at all (I referred to another user's comment to be honest. My bad, I should have mark it better.) Seriously I found your post worth to read, and I completely agree with you about getting too emotional and so on. That's why I pressed "thanks" (due to these technical infos I was unaware of before.)
Cheers
Related
I saw this video and wanted to show everyone. I do not have information about this or the user. I simply saw the video that is all. For people looking for more info sorry but you will have to do you own research as I don't have it. Best thing is to ask him on Youtube I guess.
As for me I really hope we can get a stable 1.2 Overclock to match the Sensation and SGSII at least to numbers wise. (Yes I know their customs processors may run better.) We is the video....
youtube.com/watch?v=eP4qwOBcFfk[/url]
dericb11 said:
I saw this video and wanted to show everyone. I do not have information about this or the user. I simply saw the video that is all. For people looking for more info sorry but you will have to do you own research as I don't have it. Best thing is to ask him on Youtube I guess.
As for me I really hope we can get a stable 1.2 Overclock to match the Sensation and SGSII at least to numbers wise. (Yes I know their customs processors may run better.) We is the video....
youtube.com/watch?v=eP4qwOBcFfk[/url]
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Check the Dev forum. Theres at least two kernels out now that can do 1.4-1.5 Ghz pretty stable.
Sent from my LG-P999 using XDA Premium App
dericb11 said:
I saw this video and wanted to show everyone. I do not have information about this or the user. I simply saw the video that is all. For people looking for more info sorry but you will have to do you own research as I don't have it. Best thing is to ask him on Youtube I guess.
As for me I really hope we can get a stable 1.2 Overclock to match the Sensation and SGSII at least to numbers wise. (Yes I know their customs processors may run better.) We is the video....
youtube.com/watch?v=eP4qwOBcFfk[/url]
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Really???serious???
G2X
That's badass.
inb4 he fries it.
worker1 said:
That's badass.
inb4 he fries it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So badass that we're waiting for a 1.7 oc like the Viewsonic Gtab because we know it won't fry
Thats my video yo... Pretty good benchmarks huh...
mmhmm i use faux's kernal, 1.5ghz, gotten as high as 4900 quadrant scores, phone doesnt get much warmer than my old oc'd touch pro, really stable, phone ran fine all day
g2x already outperforms the 1.7 viewsonic oc with the 1.5
amlaria said:
g2x already outperforms the 1.7 viewsonic oc with the 1.5
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
/facepalm
the viewsonic also has a lot higher resolution screen...
smashpunks said:
Thats my video yo... Pretty good benchmarks huh...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Your nenamark is a bit low, @ 1.5 should be getting 70+ fps
http://nena.se/nenamark/view?version=2
http://www.gsmarena.com/htc_sensation-review-605p4.php
Why does this sound like it belongs in the sensation section
Sent from my LG-P999 using XDA App
Its false. It isn't reading the second core on the Tegra chips. So double our score!
LG G2x - CM7.1 RC1 2.3.4
www.CincyAdmins.com
www.MiiWiiChat.com
player911 said:
Its false. It isn't reading the second core on the Tegra chips. So double our score!
LG G2x - CM7.1 RC1 2.3.4
www.CincyAdmins.com
www.MiiWiiChat.com
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How did the xoom score so well then?
Sent from somewhere with something using tapatalk
Benchmarks mean nothing. If you wanted to make a rom that scored a quadrillion on benchmarks you could, doesn't mean diddly squat in real life use. Both the sensation and g2x are very fast and comparable phones. That should be posted at the top of both forums.
Sent from my T-mobile G2 using Tapatalk
player911 said:
Its false. It isn't reading the second core on the Tegra chips. So double our score!
LG G2x - CM7.1 RC1 2.3.4
www.CincyAdmins.com
www.MiiWiiChat.com
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Which would make it faster than the GSII? Nope, not going to happen. The Tegra II isn't that powerful. Even if it was only recognizing one core which it isn't, unless you know of something I don't. The score wouldn't double if the other core kicked in. That is not how dual core processors work. Just because only one core is running, doesn't mean its running at half the speed. Besides, who really gives a **** what is faster at benchmarks anyway. There two completely different phones that shouldn't even be compared. Ones pushing a **** load more pixels and the other is running on a stock ROM.
I'm sorry but who f'n gives a crap if some stupid benchmark scores the g2x a few points lower!!
G2x>sensation all day long
"If Satan lived in heaven he'd be me... "
jrwingate6 said:
Which would make it faster than the GSII? Nope, not going to happen. The Tegra II isn't that powerful. Even if it was only recognizing one core which it isn't, unless you know of something I don't. The score wouldn't double if the other core kicked in. That is not how dual core processors work. Just because only one core is running, doesn't mean its running at half the speed. Besides, who really gives a **** what is faster at benchmarks anyway. There two completely different phones that shouldn't even be compared. Ones pushing a **** load more pixels and the other is running on a stock ROM.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I know I was being sarcastic. lmao
There is another thread on this "Nenamark2" which goes into more detail. They said it wasn't utilizing the second core. Why did the Xoom score high? Maybe because the issue is related to our kernel/hardware.
The Tegra 2 is pretty powerful. The power, though, is shown more through its GPU then through the CPU (which still keeps up with the SGS2).
Question of the day. Why do quadrant scores suck on this device? Gs2 I'm getting above 5300s and this dude has a better processor. It should be killing the Gs2 and I'm only getting 3200s. Uncalled for I say! Maybe someone with better knowledge can explain?
Sent from my SGH-I727 using Tapatalk
Our processor is not better. The gs2 has the best there is right.now. and our quadrant does not suck ove gotten over 4000 .
---------- Post added at 11:46 PM ---------- Previous post was at 11:44 PM ----------
Ours is very good and even though its clocked at 1.5 and the gs2 only at 1.2 the exynos is the best on the market period
+1 on that. Exynos is better. The OC'd gs2 is getting over 9000 on some benches like cfbench. But we have LTE so I'll take a slower bench and faster dl/ul speeds
Interesting. I didn't know the chipsets in the two were that much different.
Sent from my SGH-I727 using Tapatalk
Not to mention quadrent scores mean nothing at all as they can be boosted but make the phone lag. Only real test is real world use. All benchmark scores can be fooled into giving a high score without improving real performance
+1 as i have stated previously. Quadrant scores are like puting an elevator in an outhouse.
silver03wrx said:
+1 as i have stated previously. Quadrant scores are like puting an elevator in an outhouse.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And I could use both right now......
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using xda premium
cdshepherd said:
And I could use both right now......
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm a little concerned by that need of yours...
I agree with what was already stated.
While synthetic benchmarks are handy to track relative performance increase/decrease of a device in certain situations, they shouldn't be a deciding factor in anything. They are one source of information that should contribute to an overall decision about device performance. They should be weighted heavily with real-world use and experience.
The Adreno 220 is a better core than the Mali 400, but the Scorpion is a beefed up Cortex A8, so it's not as efficient as the Cortex A9 in the Exynos.
It's debatable as to which is more powerful in real world situations. They're pretty comparable. Skyrocket might have a slight edge in games, vanilla SGS2 has the edge in benchmarks. They're pretty close all around, though.
Frogacuda said:
The Adreno 220 is a better core than the Mali 400, but the Scorpion is a beefed up Cortex A8, so it's not as efficient as the Cortex A9 in the Exynos.
It's debatable as to which is more powerful in real world situations. They're pretty comparable. Skyrocket might have a slight edge in games, vanilla SGS2 has the edge in benchmarks. They're pretty close all around, though.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1
Quadrant scores are quite arbitrary and not reflective of the real world performance. For example, an SQL hack can get your score up by a few hundred points without a real world performance boost.
By the way, I never managed to get more than mid 3000 with the stock build on my SGS2.
enigma00 said:
+1
Quadrant scores are quite arbitrary and not reflective of the real world performance. For example, an SQL hack can get your score up by a few hundred points without a real world performance boost.
By the way, I never managed to get more than mid 3000 with the stock build on my SGS2.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Came here to say this. Also in real world usage I'll take a bigger screen and LTE over a couple fps on a graphically intensive game.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using XDA App
My best scores:
usually im around 2800-3100 but sometimes it gets crazy fast and hit: (btw the slide to unlock thing is from a security app that i was playing with, i assure it its a gs2 skyrocket)
http://www.sammobile.com/2013/04/10/galaxy-s4s-latest-benchmark-confirms-samsungs-exynos-5-octa-kills-qualcomms-snapdragon-600/
Believable?
I am quite sure this link has been posted atleast 17 times.
In the end Snapdragon is the winner since Exynos wont be out for most of the world until the end of the year, by which point people will be waiting for the GS5.........
CLARiiON said:
I am quite sure this link has been posted atleast 17 times.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's getting ridiculous at this point. The entire Exynos vs snapdragon crap and the HTC Fanboys are over old. New and important information is one thing but my peepee is bigger than your peepee is stupid.
Yet in the UK we're being given the inferior Qualcomm S4 because the Exynos doesn't support 4G. Annoying since only one carrier has 4G and it's in very very few areas.
Quit your belly achin'! At least you get a superior GPU!
I will buy octa for sure!
Faster CPU 8 cores so you can modify them all by custom kernel + Samsung says that it saves power! + better GPU
but if it not available in my country so I have to use SD600
HMJ-q8 said:
I will buy octa for sure!
Faster CPU 8 cores so you can modify them all by custom kernel + Samsung says that itsaves power! + better GPU
but if it not available in my country so I have to use SD600
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's actually looking like the enhanced Adreno 320 is better right now. Of course Exynos wins in CPU though. GPU is more important to me though, and the S600 CPU will also run anything right now fluently, Exynos is overkill IMO and good for bragging rights but in day to day use, not much else.
Carter0108 said:
Yet in the UK we're being given the inferior Qualcomm S4 because the Exynos doesn't support 4G. Annoying since only one carrier has 4G and it's in very very few areas.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Surely you don't believe that marketing bull****. Samsung cannot enough make enough Exynos chips until Q2 but wanted to release earlier to stay competitive, it's that simple. I wouldn't be surprised if they phase out the Snapdragon's by Autumn.
Sent from my C6603 using xda premium
Ussy said:
Surely you don't believe that marketing bull****. Samsung cannot enough make enough Exynos chips until Q2 but wanted to release earlier to stay competitive, it's that simple. I wouldn't be surprised if they phase out the Snapdragon's by Autumn.
Sent from my C6603 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I doubt it'll work that way. Don't forget that the Note III will be in production relatively soon and the S5 by this time next year (or sooner), so why would Samsung waste resources on producing more Exynos S4s when they can soon start offering the Note III and S5 with the Exynos processors in full production? Especially when 99% of the initial S4 owners / buyers won't notice or care about what's in the phone anyway as long as it works.
First world problems:
Do you guys think it's worth waiting for the note 3? Considering a better processor, battery life, bigger screen, and the S-Pen? (I'm pretty sure I won't use the S-Pen much, but we'll see..) Also rumors today of a possible "better quality" material..?
I believe it'll be $100 more than the S4..but are those features worth $100 more?
When would the Note 3 be released?
---
I'm buying it unlocked and running it on T-Mobile.
Decisions Decisions
Nephilim-Giant said:
First world problems:
Do you guys think it's worth waiting for the note 3? Considering a better processor, battery life, bigger screen, and the S-Pen? (I'm pretty sure I won't use the S-Pen much, but we'll see..) Also rumors today of a possible "better quality" material..?
I believe it'll be $100 more than the S4..but are those features worth $100 more?
When would the Note 3 be released?
---
I'm buying it unlocked and running it on T-Mobile.
Decisions Decisions
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you wait for the next best thing to come out you will always be waiting. When the Note3 is released, something even better will be in the making and when that is released, something better than it will be on its way...
jeffs99 said:
http://www.sammobile.com/2013/04/10/galaxy-s4s-latest-benchmark-confirms-samsungs-exynos-5-octa-kills-qualcomms-snapdragon-600/
Believable?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
THIS HAS BEEN POSTED MANY MANY TIMES IN THIS FORUM.
You're not a n00b, and you've been around here before. You know the rules. Search before posting. Period. No exceptions.
Please continue this in one of the existing threads. Please try and use the search feature before creating new threads.
Closed
so i was watching youtube and this guy did a few tests, antutu quadrant etc.the nexus 5 didnt even score as high as s4 on any of them.
is this because of 4.4? dunno just seems really odd a phone equipped the way it is wouldnt make good scores. ik they are mostly superficial but it kinda does matter to me.
clorbag said:
so i was watching youtube and this guy did a few tests, antutu quadrant etc.the nexus 5 didnt even score as high as s4 on any of them.
is this because of 4.4? dunno just seems really odd a phone equipped the way it is wouldnt make good scores. ik they are mostly superficial but it kinda does matter to me.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Samsung are one of the known companies to optimize their CPU for benchmarks. Ever since this discovery I have come to believe there completely useless!
I am pretty sure Apple do the same but not sure.
So don't bother with them no more is my advice. you will see in real world usage how much faster it is. it's a beast.
It's the same reason why you don't solely judge a football team by total yards. There's much more to the story.
Sent from my SPH-L720 using Tapatalk
yeah i thought they were odd. i had phones that were powerful that didnt score well. and phones with less power scoring insane. its really for bragging rights among friends. but its something i seem to use every time i get a new phone. that also explains why some stock roms making better scores then some of the better custom ones.
God u ppl it's android 4.4 that's why apps need to be updated for android 4.4.
Sent from my LG-D802 using Tapatalk
I don't know why this still has to be said every time a new phone is released, but here we go... Benchmark scores mean absolutely NOTHING in real world usability/performance. Stop worrying about it and enjoy your phone (whenever you get it).
technostein said:
Samsung are one of the known companies to optimize their CPU for benchmarks. Ever since this discovery I have come to believe there completely useless!
I am pretty sure Apple do the same but not sure.
So don't bother with them no more is my advice. you will see in real world usage how much faster it is. it's a beast.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Actually the same investigators who have brought the benchmark goosing issues to light have already said the neither Motorola nor Apple does this. So some companies benchmarked still hold true.
even if they mean nothing i was curious why the nexus scored lower to comparable phones. so chill man.
technostein said:
Samsung are one of the known companies to optimize their CPU for benchmarks. Ever since this discovery I have come to believe there completely useless!
I am pretty sure Apple do the same but not sure.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
According to Anandtech the performance gain of the "optimizations" is about 5%. So, not much.
And about Apple, what they do is optimize their software for specific benchmarks. Even worse IMO.
He's correct. Even if benchmarks don't matter it still shouldn't score this low. There is something wrong. Like someone said before the benchmark apps probably need to be updated to 4.4. But it is something to keep an eye on. We should keep an eye on real world performance, if that lags than we have the benchmarks as a reference.
Sent from my SGH-I747
Reminds me of The Kardashians...lots of fake drama, ultimately meaning nothing.
WHO CARES! Yes, I agree that it shouldn't be benchmarking so low with the same processor as the note 3 and g2, but in real world use, this thing probably flies like the Nexus 4.
I haven't actually used the device, so I actually have no clue if it's fast or not, but according to all the reviews and hands on's, it's fast.
---------- Post added at 08:19 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:18 PM ----------
wideasleep1 said:
Reminds me of The Kardashians...lots of fake drama, ultimately meaning nothing.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
lol
stelv said:
He's correct. Even if benchmarks don't matter it still shouldn't score this low. There is something wrong. Like someone said before the benchmark apps probably need to be updated to 4.4. But it is something to keep an eye on. We should keep an eye on real world performance, if that lags than we have the benchmarks as a reference.
Sent from my SGH-I747
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My point still stands. It all still means nothing. If the benchmark apps update for 4.4 (assuming that this is even the issue) and the scores stay low, then what? Are you going to return your phone? Are you going to demand an explanation from Google/LG? I mean, seriously what does it matter what these arbitrary scores are if your phone performs exactly as you'd expect it to?
I'm sorry if I'm coming off as an ass but it just seems silly to waste time caring about this.
sn0warmy said:
My point still stands. It all still means nothing. If the benchmark apps update for 4.4 (assuming that this is even the issue) and the scores stay low, then what? Are you going to return your phone? Are you going to demand an explanation from Google/LG? I mean, seriously what does it matter what these arbitrary scores are if your phone performs exactly as you'd expect it to?
I'm sorry if I'm coming off as an ass but it just seems silly to waste time caring about this.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Completely agree. :good:
Benchmarks are so misunderstood.
Benchmarks won't tell ya how smooth a device will be, at least with hardware within a year or 2 of each other. And that's simply cuz modern hardware will run most any semi well coded os smoothly.
Benchmarks will give ya a real good idea how long a device will take to zip or unzip files, or recode or edit that hd video you just took, or run that 3d intensive game, and many others things.
So ya see, benchmarks can be meaningless, and can be most informative. Depends on what your talking about, and the trolls never say what they are taking about. Merrily we troll along ......... troll along ......... troll along .......
sn0warmy said:
My point still stands. It all still means nothing. If the benchmark apps update for 4.4 (assuming that this is even the issue) and the scores stay low, then what? Are you going to return your phone? Are you going to demand an explanation from Google/LG? I mean, seriously what does it matter what these arbitrary scores are if your phone performs exactly as you'd expect it to?
I'm sorry if I'm coming off as an ass but it just seems silly to waste time caring about this.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Doesn't matter to me. Real world performance is all I need. They shouldn't be low though if the g2 is getting 1,000s of points higher. I am sure everything will be fine though when I get mine and test it out.
Sent from my SGH-I747
stelv said:
He's correct. Even if benchmarks don't matter it still shouldn't score this low. There is something wrong. Like someone said before the benchmark apps probably need to be updated to 4.4. But it is something to keep an eye on. We should keep an eye on real world performance, if that lags than we have the benchmarks as a reference.
Sent from my SGH-I747
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But it was the Same with the Nexus 4. the Xperia Z blew it away even with same specs. Which is more evidence that benchmarks are useless.
One thing I can't help but wonder is how much would a iPhone score with a snapdragon 800
some of you are taking this out of context and making it more then it needs to be. all i want to know is why its not scoring as high as expected or to comparable devices. i don't care if benchmark tests mean anything or not.
clorbag said:
some of you are taking this out of context and making it more then it needs to be. all i want to know is why its not scoring as high as expected or to comparable devices. i don't care if benchmark tests mean anything or not.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
so far we can only guess that it might not be optimized for 4.4
Most synthetic benchmarks are useless and misleading. The only ones I pay attention to are ones based on real game engines like Epic Citadel and Anomaly 2. Can anyone share benchmark results for these two at highest settings?