I haven't seen a thread with just scores so if everyone wants to post here. Let's see what you guy's are working with. Screenshots or videos.
Just include if your phone is stock or which Rom is loaded, and score.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
http://youtu.be/mAUvQGYf9_U - High BenchMark!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SX9wrKg6COM&sns=em another High Bench.
What are you guys scoring.??????????????/
Sent from my HTC Sensation XE with Beats Audio using XDA App
You may want to hit up a mod to move this to the general section. I foresee flaming in the next 3. . . 2. . . 1. . .
Mi|enko said:
You may want to hit up a mod to move this to the general section. I foresee flaming in the next 3. . . 2. . . 1. . .
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1
Mod please move my thread if needed, wouldn't want to get flamed by the youngsters
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SX9wrKg6COM&sns=em
Sent from my HTC Sensation XE with Beats Audio using XDA App
another benchmark video WOAH! high score http://youtu.be/mAUvQGYf9_U
It's been said a million times on here, but incase you didn't know Quadrant isn't a reliable benchmark app. It's not compatible with dual core and the results can easily be altered by certain apps.
Is there a reliable app or test you would say works..
Sent from my HTC Sensation XE with Beats Audio using XDA App
I'd lay off of the benchmarks. Do you prefer a high benchmark but laggy experience, or just a good experience. This is just my POV and is why I never benchmark my phone. I don't see the need for it.
myTouchJosh said:
Is there a reliable app or test you would say works..
Sent from my HTC Sensation XE with Beats Audio using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
CF Bench and Antutu are good ones.
Oh and there will never be a case where a phone is laggy yet has great benchmarks. The opposite has been true for me each and every time.
One example: I kept seeing CM7 lag like nuts after build 2 and on came out. I kept seeing my benchmark scores suffer tremendously too, but was mocked up and down for it. Then it came out that CM7 had an issue where the second core was turning off and staying off for some.
They have their purpose. Its not like you can say that a particular score on CF Bench is needed in order to properly utilize some app or game, but you CAN see whether or not "enhancements" actually do anything when flashing different ROMs. Most of the time, the phone isnt laggy. The scores could be anything from great to borderline alright. A dev should be using benchmarks to see if their work is producing better scores (which WILL translate to better performance) or worse scores. Now, looking at my old mytouch 3g scores....I laugh at it and acknowledge that it cannot run most the things my Sensation can run (single core aside). So, if your scores is 300, you can be sure you wont be running apps that a phone with a score of 7000 can.
Quadrant is nice for its FPS tests. You can see in real time how the FPS is doing. I can clock down to 800Mhz and see crummy FPS and then crank up to 1.5Ghz and see good FPS.
Alot of you haters need to figure out WHAT you hate so much about benchmarks because alot of the comments seem indoctrinated.
EDIT: They are also nice for stress testing your phone when doing something like clocking up or undervolting the CPU (ill advised!).
Matt
ARHD 6.6.2, Faux Kernel
ARHD 6.6.2, Faux Kernel
Happy with it as my earlier T-Mobile Gingerbread never went beyond 1900 on quadrant standard benchmark test.
Related
My score is 2400.. The only phone ive seen higher is the Atrix 4G..
Let me know your scores on the G2x!!
Highest score I've gotten is 2732, although the highest one i have a screenshot of is 2724. I posted it in the lg g2x benchmark thread a while ago.
EDIT: just ran it on the leaked gingerbread rom and got 2805
I dunno much about benchmarking android devices, I assume it's like running one on a PC where you really want to do it with a clean install and nothing unnecessary running. If that's the case, then my phone ought to be able to do much better than this.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
earlier today on my 3rd or 4th run.
The g2x would get a much much better score in quadrant if it didn't score so low in the 2d test. It seems to score the same in the 2d test as most single core devices at around 19fps. If you look at the individual test part scores you can see that the difference in the g2x score and the sgsII score is about the difference in the 2D test score.
I can get over 2800 with EagleBlood 1.03 Gingerbread. I turn on Airplane mode, turn off auto sync, and turn on wi-fi, and get over 2800 easily.
G2x at 1.3 GHz, using quad std you can.t see the tint I/O score compared to my higher scoring NS. Any other quad i will thus post from quad adv.
I/O really kills the avg at ~1400 vs ~4500
http://www.jpct.de/an3dbenchxl/show.php?code=MjYyNzQx163391&page=0
that's a nice benchmark too
stock-stock rom....
I am getting anywhere from 2300 to 2500 when I run quadrant on my G2x.
Got a 2921 out of mine. Pretty good!
This is one of the lowest I've experienced, but who counts quadrant scores? How about smartbench 2011 for our type of phones?? Neocore scores too. Power!!
While I was installing all my apps, no less.
-bZj
EaglesBlood 1.03
EaglesBlood 1.03 with Morfic's kernel. But benchmarks are worthless. That being said I still like high numbers so here it is.
I'm not allowed to post outside links, but my highest is 2573. Liking the numbers coming from the EagleBlood rom though.
Sent from my LG-P999 using Tapatalk
Mine is EaglesBlood 1.03 with Morfic's OC kernel.
I've only ran Quadrant Advanced twice and my highest score was 2700...
Sent from my LG-P999 using XDA Premium App
Okay got a new record on my stock rooted rom.
Sent from my LG-P999 using Tapatalk
EagleBlood 1.03 + Morfic OC/UV kernel
I am only getting 2057. What is happening here!!
Totally stock, i dont even know how to root. :lol:
tmdz28 said:
I am only getting 2057. What is happening here!!
Totally stock, i dont even know how to root. :lol:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1060715
There you go pal.
Btw, where can i find morfic's kernel..? I see 2 kernel's in the Dev forum but none from Morfic.
hey guys
anyone compared the Sensation Quadrant score with Sense and then on CM7?
We all know Sense uses a lot of RAM and so CM7 should use much less.
i get over 3000 mostly everytime with cm7 while with sense roms i got 2400-2600
deol 4ever said:
i get over 3000 mostly everytime with cm7 while with sense roms i got 2400-2600
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thanks
the galaxy s 2 vs sensation face offs are not very fair seeing as Touch Wiz does not use as much RAM and CPU as Sense 3.0 so in all those tests the Sensation looses. Im not sure if I should hold off and get HTC Vigor with 1GB RAM.
Nekromantik said:
thanks
the galaxy s 2 vs sensation face offs are not very fair seeing as Touch Wiz does not use as much RAM and CPU as Sense 3.0 so in all those tests the Sensation looses. Im not sure if I should hold off and get HTC Vigor with 1GB RAM.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ever heard the saying RUN WHAT YA BRUNG? Stop measurebating the sensation and sgs2 and be happy with your phone. I get 5300+ in quadrant at 1.6, but who in the **** cares. Just enjoy your phone.
Sent from my Insanity powered SGS2
antiochasylum said:
Ever heard the saying RUN WHAT YA BRUNG? Stop measurebating the sensation and sgs2 and be happy with your phone. I get 5300+ in quadrant at 1.6, but who in the **** cares. Just enjoy your phone.
Sent from my Insanity powered SGS2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Because you really notice the difference in day to day use.
Not!
Sent from my Sensation using Cyanogenmod
antiochasylum said:
Ever heard the saying RUN WHAT YA BRUNG? Stop measurebating the sensation and sgs2 and be happy with your phone. I get 5300+ in quadrant at 1.6, but who in the **** cares. Just enjoy your phone.
Sent from my Insanity powered SGS2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you. The S2 has a superior processor, there's no way of getting around that. But the Sensation is no slouch either.
aNYthing24 said:
Thank you. The S2 has a superior processor, there's no way of getting around that. But the Sensation is no slouch either.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The sensation is by no means a slouch. It's a nice phone. The build quality owns that of the sgs2! But honestly this is down to a my penis is bigger than yours debate now.
I don't know why some ppl are always talking about Quandrant.It cannot show your real performance at all.
If you really like benchmark,why not use cf-bench?
my latest on CM7:
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
meh....
Just a thread to post screen shots of your Sensations Bench scores, and discuss what settings, apps, scripts, etc. you're using ,to see how far we can take our dual core and how much we can learn about optimal settings, etc. Lets see who can be the fastest and how they got there. People on Sense Roms feel free to post here too and have your Sense Wars. AOSP ROMs will almost always be higher on bench scores since there is less bogging down the system.
Benches can be manipulated.
For example- turning up the settings/overclocking to run the phone harder and at maximum rates. They may also be manipulated in other fashions. Feel free to question any score.
No SS=No proof.
Use whatever Bench you want. Antutu and CF-Bench are the standards, as Quadrant often gives crazy high or low scores on its own. Though no bench is truly accurate, because when ran at max with Airplane Mode on, they never return the same number. Leaving you to kind of weed out the bad tests and average out your score. They can be used to get a good general idea of performance related settings.
They should also be done at daily driver settings and clocks to find out what it kind of speed we can get out of our DD settings.
Be honest about your settings. This is only for fun and/or seeing what set ups/numbers/clockings work. Which save battery, etc.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
On CM7 Alpha9.
Running System Tuner Pro maxing both cores at 1.78. Faux CM7 0.2.0 1.78 Kernel.
V6 Supercharger Script set to max ram 100m(setting number 11 or 12)
I like to call this screenshot
"Running with Tabs!"
Sent from where ever I was when I posted this
CF Bench
Sent from where ever I was when I posted this
Sent from my HTC Sensation Z710e
idavid_ said:
Sent from my HTC Sensation Z710e
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ha. Already a joker.
Sent from where ever I was when I posted this
sinisin said:
Ha. Already a joker.
Sent from where ever I was when I posted this
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I just had to post it lol. Seriously though, I get around 2150 on Quadrant, but it's a **** benchmark that can be easily manipulated anyway (see pic above)
Sent from my HTC Sensation Z710e
sinisin said:
Ha. Already a joker.
Sent from where ever I was when I posted this
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
His point is bench marks mean jack sh#t!
idavid_ said:
I just had to post it lol. Seriously though, I get around 2150 on Quadrant, but it's a **** benchmark that can be easily manipulated anyway (see pic above)
Sent from my HTC Sensation Z710e
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ill post SS later when I get my new phone in the mail. (Bricked the old one somehow).
1.56Ghz...
My CF bench best is 7040-CM7 build 9, faux kernel (latest)
Quadrant is 4014
Antutu is 6700
Matt
Behold_this said:
His point is bench marks mean jack sh#t!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Benches shouldn't be lived by. Quadrant is a very flawed test IMO. On my daily driver settings this is my score. So this is why I say post your settings as well so we can find(hopefully) a good general performance standard for settings/mods/scripts, etc.
Same settings. Just not locking CPU1 online. Also left on max clock.
Sent from where ever I was when I posted this
This is 1188mhz obviously.
V6 Supercharger set at Max Ram with HTK Launcher.
No second core forced on.
Sent from my Sensation using xda premium
Hey guys. After having owned the sensation for four months I just want to know why it is so much slower than the sgs2. Even when I overclocked my processors to 1.7ghz it was still noticeably slower than my friend's sgs2. No we did not use speedtests we did just usual tests like browser. Why is the sensation so bad for a 'dualcore phone '.?
what rom are you on. I have yet to have this problem even on stock
Currently cyanogenmod but ik its the rom. I was just wandering why the phone is so much slower than the sgs2
Sent from my Sensation using XDA App
I got both phones, and is the opposite
I fell sensation smoother than s2
On stock sensation was slower, on cyanogen was a disaster..
Now i'm on ICS sense and is flying, much much better than s2
Really? You found cyanogenmod slow? Could you please tell me which ics rom you were using to achieve the speed
oh well ever since i updated to ics and new firmware this phone has went wild with speed lol
So I'll.have to restore to stock?
sensation lover said:
So I'll.have to restore to stock?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
For speed you MUST try a ICS rom! Just upgrade to .24 firmware and flash any ics rom, you will get a uber speed..!! And consider they are only at beta-test stage..
Make sure u do a full wipe with mikes superwipe script before flashing ics roms. U need to flash the 3.24 fw in bootloader. Its ez stuff
Sent From My steak using A1 steak sauce app (Sensation)
My sister owns a SGS2, so I can make a direct comparison as well.
I'm running Android 4.0.3, Sense 3.6, ARHD 6.2.1, O/C Kernel @ 1.5Ghz.
The Sensation is FLYING - SGS2 ain't got nothing on the speed of a rooted Sensation. My sister even complained to me why my phone runs a lot smoother and faster AND even has the nicer animations from HTC Sense.
I can only imagine that if you were to run a Senseless ROM, the speed would increase even more.
We were pretty much running the same apps in the background and just switched between them, did a couple of browser and market tests and the Sensation came way ahead - again, that's with HTC Sense and my phone was even running a couple more widgets. (PowerAmp, Astrid etc.)
So maybe for the complete stock versions that might be different, but running a Senseless ROM on this phone should give you the smoothest experience that you can expect from a smartphone. The only thing stopping it might be badly coded apps.
I am running HyperSensation Version 1.6, based on CM7 and the phone zips through just about everything, and I have actually underclocked the processor down to 1026mhz.
Haven't tried any of the ICS ROMS yet to compare, but personally I'm not a big fan of Sense. Maybe 4.0 will win me over.
Flash beastmod. It fully stabke and fast as s2
Sent from my HTC Sensation XE using xda premium
So no sense roms?can anybody tell which is that fastest out of them as well. Currently I have virtuous Inquisition and cyanogenmod
sensation lover said:
Hey guys. After having owned the sensation for four months I just want to know why it is so much slower than the sgs2. Even when I overclocked my processors to 1.7ghz it was still noticeably slower than my friend's sgs2. No we did not use speedtests we did just usual tests like browser. Why is the sensation so bad for a 'dualcore phone '.?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Ok, well here is a CF bench speedtest. Apparently something isn't right with your phone. I would suggest a full wipe, install ROM, then 1.73 kernel and re-compare...
Why is the score so low?
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my One X using xda app-developers app
Looks like your CPU is underclocked or set to a power-saving governor. Check the Performance tab under settings.
Honestly, it's not worth worrying about, unless you really care about benchmarks. Are you noticing any actual performance issues in day-to-day use?
Arbitrary numbers mean nothing.
As long as your phone handles the task, who cares?
Why in the wrong section
Sent from my HTC One XL using Tapatalk 2
Quadrant scores are always a bit lower on AOSP builds. Doesn't mean squat for real world performance.
robstunner said:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
nice one
The only Android phone I've had where Quadrant scores are really high compared to stock with Cyanogenmod was an Atrix. It jumped from around 2500 to 5500.That's 3000 over stock. It didn't show too much of a difference though like it sounds. Every other phone I've stayed nearly the same or a little less.
Mine. Running expiramentalx kernel and viper rom ice cream sandwich version.
Sent from the best d*** phone I've ever used
my s3 gets 6000 on touchwiz and 4500 on cm10.1
it is probably making our devices slower, but the project butter makes us not notice lol
I can't believe no-one has flamed you.... Ok, this one's for you...
Benchmarks means nothing! ! !
Jk with you
I don't know why that is. Have you tried playing with developer options? I've never gotten lower benchmarks on cm.
Sent from my HTC One X+ using xda app-developers app
Its low cause you are not on viperx 3.1
Sent from my HTC One XL using xda premium
DESERT.TECH said:
Its low cause you are not on viperx 3.1
Sent from my HTC One XL using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've gotten my lowest benchmarks on quadrant.
Sent from my HTC One X+ using xda app-developers app