[ROM][2.3.7][GWK74] CyanogenMod 7 for Samsung Galaxy SL - Samsung Galaxy SL i9003

NEW THREAD: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1374340

Thanx a lot bro... nw m going to test it...

i'm sure the audio quality would b better

A cleaner thread. I guess this is better than moving the previous one.

I've tested bro... bt please fix all bugs as soon as possible... than agn..

Aaditya2 said:
I've tested bro... bt please fix all bugs as soon as possible... than agn..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Don't worry, he will fix it when he has the time, Please don't rush him.

Just had a brief test and the back facing camera had a little problem tho.
The screen is totally black and can't see a thing but front facing one is ok. If I take a snapshot the camera crashes.
Sent from my GT-I9003 using Tapatalk

d8nnii said:
Just had a brief test and the back facing camera had a little problem tho.
The screen is totally black and can't see a thing but front facing one is ok. If I take a snapshot the camera crashes.
Sent from my GT-I9003 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can you read the 1st post again sir??? Pls to all tester pls dont repeat such problem you encounter.. Youre just making this thread annoying to all the members who visits..
IF YOU ARE NOOb PLS READ THE FIRST POST!!!
We want a clean cm7 thread..
Sent from my GT-I9003 using xda premium

i am expecting someone to port icecream sandwich on samsung galaxy SL
so if anyone is interested
lets do it
Sent from my GT-I9003 using xda premium

mjbri0613 said:
Can you read the 1st post again sir??? Pls to all tester pls dont repeat such problem you encounter.. Youre just making this thread annoying to all the members who visits..
IF YOU ARE NOOb PLS READ THE FIRST POST!!!
We want a clean cm7 thread..
Sent from my GT-I9003 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Alright, apologies I missed that part. My bad..
Sent from my GT-I9003 using Tapatalk

manishnraj said:
i am expecting someone to port icecream sandwich on samsung galaxy SL
so if anyone is interested
lets do it
Sent from my GT-I9003 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And how is this CM7 related? Have you read the rules? or just decided this was IRC?

Cyanogen mod will do it for our device
manishnraj said:
i am expecting someone to port icecream sandwich on samsung galaxy SL
so if anyone is interested
lets do it
Sent from my GT-I9003 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sent from my GT-I9003 using XDA App

manishnraj said:
i am expecting someone to port icecream sandwich on samsung galaxy SL
so if anyone is interested
lets do it
Sent from my GT-I9003 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
no sources, no port. wait till december.
but then we'll work on the top devices first (i9000, i9100), so you'll maybe get ICS in middle of next year.

codeworkx said:
no sources, no port. wait till december.
but then we'll work on the top devices first (i9000, i9100), so you'll maybe get ICS in middle of next year.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ICS code will be completely diffrent from GB. Then while porting cynogen mod of ICS do we still have to face problems that time also (like broken camera)...?

vishal24387 said:
ICS code will be completely diffrent from GB. Then while porting cynogen mod of ICS do we still have to face problems that time also (like broken camera)...?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I wouldn't say completely different.
But if i'm not able to get the camera on gingerbread working, i'll not work on ICS for this phone. Waste of time...

codeworkx said:
I wouldn't say completely different.
But if i'm not able to get the camera on gingerbread working, i'll not work on ICS for this phone. Waste of time...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
oh sad...! Just a last question Is Amit also working with u? Since he is working on this project from long time may be he can help u in a better way. Also in all samsung android devices is galaxy I9003 is the most unlucky device or are there some similar examples of devices exists which face unsuccessful camera porting in CM7...?

vishal24387 said:
oh sad...! Just a last question Is Amit also working with u? Since he is working on this project from long time may be he can help u in a better way. Also in all samsung android devices is galaxy I9003 is the most unlucky device or are there some similar examples of devices exists which face unsuccessful camera porting in CM7...?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
amit is on vacations.
i'm sure he'll help, but he's a beginner on cm.
if i look at the stuff he has done, it reminds me of my first attempts. ;-)
don't know if there are any devices out. there are not much developers on samsung phones. every phone we've done is running fine, but we never ported a low activity device like i9003.

codeworkx said:
amit is on vacations.
i'm sure he'll help, but he's a beginner on cm.
if i look at the stuff he has done, it reminds me of my first attempts. ;-)
don't know if there are any devices out. there are not much developers on samsung phones. every phone we've done is running fine, but we never ported a low activity device like i9003.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
really samsung has messed with our phone. They have given strong hardware support but bad complex coding has messed everything. Amit has really great knowledge of kernal coding. He also tried alot differents stuffs related to kernal such as overclocking. But he always failed like skin in getting a stable overclock kernal. They are also frustrated because they never come to know what was missing or messed in kernal codes.
I am sure that if Amit give more time for developement to u then ur both effort's will do some magic.

codeworkx said:
I wouldn't say completely different.
But if i'm not able to get the camera on gingerbread working, i'll not work on ICS for this phone. Waste of time...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Any update on the camera?
Sent from my GT-I9003 using XDA App

vishal24387 said:
really samsung has messed with our phone. They have given strong hardware support but bad complex coding has messed everything. Amit has really great knowledge of kernal coding. He also tried alot differents stuffs related to kernal such as overclocking. But he always failed like skin in getting a stable overclock kernal. They are also frustrated because they never come to know what was missing or messed in kernal codes.
I am sure that if Amit give more time for developement to u then ur both effort's will do some magic.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
overclocking.... kernel coding.... hmmkay
this is really important. -.-

Related

Porting Android 2.3 (Gingerbread)

Hey devs,
Recently HTC released HTC Wildfire S which has same processor as Mini,same resolution,etc
OS Kernel version is 2.6.35
Will it be possible to port it to Mini?
Details here: http://pdadb.net/index.php?m=specs&id=2783&view=1&c=htc_wildfire_s_htc_marvel
I uploaded the ROM( PG76IMG_Marvel_HTC_Europe_1.33.401.2_Radio_47.10.35.3029H_7.46.35.08_release_185
724_signed.zip),here are the links:
http://ge.tt/6wbsj4I?c
https://www.rapidshare.com/files/46...35.3029H_7.46.35.08_release_185724_signed.zip
@ robin,schlund..any ideas?
ahhh, i cannot work an three things at the same time...
ginger is absolutely not important to me now... i am faced on 3G now ..
schlund said:
ahhh, i cannot work an three things at the same time...
ginger is absolutely not important to me now... i am faced on 3G now ..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
alright,is not an emergency,just wanted to let you know about it
thanks for answer
Isn't it possible to use the original Android made by google instead of using the Android which is ripped from other HTC devices?
schlund said:
ahhh, i cannot work an three things at the same time...
ginger is absolutely not important to me now... i am faced on 3G now ..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1
first focus on the current version
once we have fixed the main bugs we can think about porting it to upper android versions
unless some other devs join us...
Well done
When do we get to play with it
the boss of bosses
thank you
eager to read!
What does that mean?
It will be a 100% working android or what?
And what it is the next step that you will do for this android?
Card yes you so Good . Did you already release this version? And is 3g also working
Sent from my HTC Liberty using XDA App
could any body tell us how much time it will take to upload the 1st release?
I´m agree, i don´t understand the fight, but why close the thread for one person if you can see that´s this thread was see for more 4800 people?.
I can´t help you with your work´s because I don´t know nothing about linux or Android builds.
Good Lucks
So trazcapaza wwhat do you say . Wwork togheter ?
Sent from my HTC Liberty using XDA App
superzuan said:
So trazcapaza wwhat do you say . Wwork togheter ?
Sent from my HTC Liberty using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I say that if all other devs refused to work with him that means they have some good reasons...
Wowwww what a pitty
Sent from my HTC Liberty using XDA App
What will happen now. We look forward to this great project with curiosity. I'm so sorry
draltus said:
What will happen now. We look forward to this great project with curiosity. I'm so sorry
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think he has been banned!
think 2 because al his posts are gone
bruce2728 said:
I think he has been banned!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
cardsharing Account is currently disabled
cardsharing is 100% right! @tracapaca? Developer? ghhhh shame!

[Q] Cyanogen Mod 7.1

So I read that CM7.1 has been released and among the newly supported devices was the samsung vibrant and galaxy s. Still nothing for SGS4G, but I was wondering how far off this could be given the expanded support to similar devices. Any of the current devs out there think this makes it more practical to get it to our device?
First dont post here, bla,bla bla second u scared the **** out of me when j saw cyaogen mod in sg4g development
Sent from my SGH-T959V using XDA App
nailedtonothing said:
So I read that CM7.1 has been released and among the newly supported devices was the samsung vibrant and galaxy s. Still nothing for SGS4G, but I was wondering how far off this could be given the expanded support to similar devices. Any of the current devs out there think this makes it more practical to get it to our device?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why would you put a question in,the dev forum. Last time I checked there was a q&a section
Sent from my SGH-T959V using XDA Premium App
exactly my line of thought
spy4ka said:
First dont post here, bla,bla bla second u scared the **** out of me when j saw cyaogen mod in sg4g development
Sent from my SGH-T959V using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sent from my SGS4G using XDA Premium App
nailedtonothing said:
So I read that CM7.1 has been released and among the newly supported devices was the samsung vibrant and galaxy s. Still nothing for SGS4G, but I was wondering how far off this could be given the expanded support to similar devices. Any of the current devs out there think this makes it more practical to get it to our device?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes its in the wrong fourms but im going to answer your question anyways.
the reason you dont see cm7 for the sgs4g is lack of a asop kernel (sence we dont have access to gb sourcecode for the sgs4g kernel.. (and theres alot of diffrences between the sgs4g and your typical galaxy s series rom that makes porting it without the source cumbersome.....
krylon 360 has been working forever on cm7 for the sgs4g and has done well they need the kernel source from gb to finish the kernel and complete the work..
so once samsung cough goes final with the gb rom and gives us source for the kernel expect cm7 and other asop roms in there fully glory
spy4ka said:
First dont post here, bla,bla bla second u scared the **** out of me when j saw cyaogen mod in sg4g development
Sent from my SGH-T959V using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Man I feel exactly the same. So i open the page, and the first thing that shows up is cyanogenmod 7.1. My mind was partying until I saw [q] before it.
spy4ka said:
First dont post here, bla,bla bla second u scared the **** out of me when j saw cyaogen mod in sg4g development
Sent from my SGH-T959V using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
SCARED THE LIVING **** OUTTA ME 2 LOL
Sent from my SGH-T959V using xda premium
wish it was real.
---------- Post added at 02:48 AM ---------- Previous post was at 02:47 AM ----------
can we not ask cyanogen guy steve as he is an official dev for samsung, when official gb will be out?
RaverX3X said:
Yes its in the wrong fourms but im going to answer your question anyways.
the reason you dont see cm7 for the sgs4g is lack of a asop kernel (sence we dont have access to gb sourcecode for the sgs4g kernel.. (and theres alot of diffrences between the sgs4g and your typical galaxy s series rom that makes porting it without the source cumbersome.....
krylon 360 has been working forever on cm7 for the sgs4g and has done well they need the kernel source from gb to finish the kernel and complete the work..
so once samsung cough goes final with the gb rom and gives us source for the kernel expect cm7 and other asop roms in there fully glory
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
what if samsung release the official gb after the KZ10 leak?
mzangui said:
what if samsung release the official gb after the KZ10 leak?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
KZ10? I was expecting a SGH-T959VMCNAQLIRJD1963804 leak!
I have the CM7 rom for the 4g. The only problem is, the only things working are GPS and Buddies Now.
nazcalito said:
I have the CM7 rom for the 4g. The only problem is, the only things working are GPS and Buddies Now.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I got fb working without data or wifi ...
Sent from my SGH-T959V using XDA App
You just ruined my night. It was like waking up on christmas...only to find you have no presents. Thanks.
Sent from my GT-P7510 using xda premium
spy4ka said:
First dont post here, bla,bla bla second u scared the **** out of me when j saw cyaogen mod in sg4g development
Sent from my SGH-T959V using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lolz i know rite..
Sent from my SGH-T959V using xda premium
I apologize for getting everyone too excited and posting in the wrong thread. I don't spend very much time on these forums and didn't realize there was a q&a section. Thanks for the explanations though, hopefully we'll see it develop eventually. To be honest, I think my time with SGS4G will be ending once the nexus prime or whatever they're calling it now arrives.
spy4ka said:
First dont post here, bla,bla bla second u scared the **** out of me when j saw cyaogen mod in sg4g development
Sent from my SGH-T959V using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Word bro
Sent from My. Olympus on my SGH-T959VUVKD1

[REQUEST]Help Needed For Miui V4 Port

Hey guys, jomeister here with a request for some dev help with porting Miuiv4 to our phones. I figure now that the ICS drivers has been released, and with my AOSP rom being updated soon, we might as well get down to business with some ICS Miui.
So far, I've been looking at this page here ------> http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1499411
And trying to use a phone with the msm8660 processor to port off, the evo 3d
here ------> http://www.goodandevo.net/2012/02/u...d.html?cid=6a00d83451c9ec69e2016301cbfba1970d.
So.... yeah, if you're willing to help me with this, please leave a comment so we can get started on some Miui goodness.
iandroidos I'm looking at you.
Hmmm I'll do a blind port with a few help from other friends of mine MIUI v4 will be simple since its minimal for now but not really simple.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2 Beta-4
The title excited me so that I had to change my pants...
This Kid will help you jomeister15!
XAviierG said:
Hmmm I'll do a blind port with a few help from other friends of mine MIUI v4 will be simple since its minimal for now but not really simple.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2 Beta-4
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hehe sure! Of course I'll help!
I won't be able to start tonight though. I'll take a look tomorrow
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using XDA
As I'm reading the instructions, I'm starting to doubt more and more if this will work or not. The Evo 3D is a very different device... Not to mention that it's HTC, and not Samsung.
I'm downloading the Evo3D rom right now anyways. Going to try this.
iandr0idos said:
As I'm reading the instructions, I'm starting to doubt more and more if this will work or not. The Evo 3D is a very different device... Not to mention that it's HTC, and not Samsung.
I'm downloading the Evo3D rom right now anyways. Going to try this.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, really the only difference between Miui and AOSP is the system/framework, some system/apps, and some other random files that aren't really that critical to the system. The Evo 3D actually not that different from our Skyrocket; they both have the same msm8660 chip.
Yeah... but still a very slim chance that it'll work.
I tried it, and as expected: softbrick
It didn't even post. o.o
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using XDA
Hey guys any chance we would be getting at least an alpha of this soon? Just wondering cause of the new unofficial cm9 build that was released yesterday
Strange that this thread should be woken up today.
Hey jo, wali10x and I are working on a MIUIv4 ROM. Care to help? We're stuck on something very, very annoying.
iandr0idos said:
Strange that this thread should be woken up today.
Hey jo, wali10x and I are working on a MIUIv4 ROM. Care to help? We're stuck on something very, very annoying.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I would take it you guys are using the new cm9 as a base?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using xda premium
BaconStep said:
I would take it you guys are using the new cm9 as a base?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Actually, we aren't.
I would love to help but I'm pretty inexperienced I'd be happy to help if you want to walk me through any steps or test anything for yous lemme know
We've been trying and so far, from what I know, we fixed surfaceflinger in the CM9 base but AtCmdFwd won't start. I believe it is because of libhardware_legacy.so
I Be Peanut Butter... You Be Jelly
peteyc66 said:
I would love to help but I'm pretty inexperienced I'd be happy to help if you want to walk me through any steps or test anything for yous lemme know
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Same here.....glad to help....not much experience.
Joe, how's your aosp build coming along?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using XDA

Many rom no stable.

I want to thank you all for your hard work but please we commit all to create a single rom stable and efficient, and only after many rom for everyone.
For example, our device is one of the few in its class to not have a regular stable MIUI
Thanks friend :good:
ArchTux said:
I want to thank you all for your hard work but please we commit all to create a single rom stable and efficient, and only after many rom for everyone.
For example, our device is one of the few in its class to not have a regular stable MIUI
Thanks friend :good:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Dude this is a development thread. Don't post general stuff here. PM mods to move this to general .
You're welcome, ArchTux.
mdaamir1989 said:
Dude this is a development thread. Don't post general stuff here. PM mods to move this to general .
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Is not a general stuff but it's for developpers
ArchTux said:
Is not a general stuff but it's for developpers
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Exactly. Devs will be appreciated more if it's in the Dev section.
ArchTux said:
Is not a general stuff but it's for developpers
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
They wont do it just cause someone else is asking them to do it. Every developer develops what is he capable or comfortable developing. U cant tell them what to do . Let them do what they are comfortable doing.
Since the devs are busy on Kernel 3.0 they cant look into this stuff. Maybe later sometime down the lane if they want to they will .
Anyways good luck with Appreciating Devs this way :good:
ArchTux said:
I want to thank you all for your hard work but please we commit all to create a single rom stable and efficient, and only after many rom for everyone.
For example, our device is one of the few in its class to not have a regular stable MIUI
Thanks friend :good:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
"We commit all to create a single ROM stable and efficient," Are you making speech here, huh? The Devs are working on it, whatever you said that I quote are every AOSP developers dream.
Everyone here is waiting for the Kernel, if you can help, help them. But if you don't, then stop whining like a 5 years old kid at the candy store.
You know Sammy hate AOSP Developers. If this how you appreciated Developers, get a life! even 5 years old kid won't appreciated their parents this way!
CAN SOMEBODY CALL THE MODS? THIS TOPIC SHOULD BE IN TARTARUS!
Proud owner of Galaxy SL that running on Paranoid Android.
See bro if u want have a stable rom u can certainly have dhiru's cm9. Or u can switch back to ddlf2 in gb.
What you trying to point out is work done by lolation, he ports a rom a day and its brilliant
Our sl is in one of the many devices abandoned by samsung. Other devices have a PROPER STABLE KERNEL (readymade). Which we dont!
But people like dhiru adi and lola have saved our device. You are not paying these developers , they are doing because android is like their passion . If u want a stable rom make it yourself and dont discourage devs!
Sent from my GT-I9003 using xda premium running lola's jellybam 4.1.0
Awesome lecture...100/100 for the work done by devs...i bet in coming days dhiru is gonna change our feel of SL
Sent from my GT-I9003 using xda-developers app
I WANT A DouBLE CHEESE WITH THIS AND A STABLE ROM.
BUT THEIR STUPID DEV Y NOT JUST BRING THE STABLE AND AWESOME PARAMETERS AND PUT THEM IN A FUC**ING ROM? LOL XD hAD to TEll THem Everything THEY STUPID. LOL
That's sarcasm right? LOL
Sent from my GT-P7510 using xda app-developers app
BassBlaster said:
That's sarcasm right? LOL
Sent from my GT-P7510 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Think so Coz he/she used LOL 2 times . I was like dafuq after reading the comment :laugh:
u 2 are super to known what he or she talking about.
Sent from my GT-I9003 using Tapatalk 2
mcrocodile said:
BUT THEIR STUPID DEV Y NOT JUST BRING THE STABLE AND AWESOME PARAMETERS AND PUT THEM IN A FUC**ING ROM? LOL XD hAD to TEll THem Everything THEY STUPID. LOL
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sarcasm or not,
Still show some respect for the devs.
Sent from my GT-I9003 using xda app-developers app

[REQUEST] Pls port Sense UI to our beloved R

Hey guys (adam,grarak,vikram,selva and other gr8 developers)
I have seen many ppl talking abt sense ui which made me think dat it mite be gud. So finally one day i saw the sense uo and was amazed it was gr8. I even tried to use the guide in the general thread dis 1 http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1721539
But honestly i dont know a think abt porting and the kitchen et cetera, et cetera can any of you pls pls port sense ui to our Galaxy R. It will look absolutely stunning. I am sure many ppl would want to try sense on our R. So guys if u have time pls try and port the sense ui to our device. Possibly whoever wants the sense ui can +1 in dis thread wat u say?
Thanks and regards.
Sent from my GT-I9103 using xda premium
Even i m thinking the same. Sense UI is something different from others. Great transitions and what a nice widgets it have.. But let wait if any intersted dev would say yes for this..
Sent from my GT-I9103 using xda premium
Sense UI is definitely very great. But it is a huge beast having a lot of custom modifications to the core system. Extremely hard to port. Even Sense4All project has many issues.
Adam77Root said:
Sense UI is definitely very great. But it is a huge beast having a lot of custom modifications to the core system. Extremely hard to port. Even Sense4All project has many issues.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Exactly. The matter which complicates things even more is that no Samsung and HTC devices share a chipset, making it impossible to find a common denominator so to say
Sent from my GT-I9100
If I helped you, please hit the thanks button!
Sense UI is really something.. We all know that.. Even i would love to see it in our SGR.. If the developers are interested, i think we can conduct a poll question for this topic.. What do u say guys?
Poll for what my friend? Just read Adam's post. This is a hell lot of work. We might as well port the S2 Official JB ROM before we are even half way through this. As it is Adam has his hands filled with CM, Karthik is resuming AOSP soon, Grarak has multiple ROM's and so has MJ. I suggest we focus on getting stable ROM's rather than a myriad of unstable/unusable ones. Just imagine, all that work and what you get in the end is a Sense Look Alike, half stable that a FEW people MAY/WOULD like to try. Not a good deal I feel.
So d point is we wont get sense
Sent from my GT-I9103 using xda premium
Sense doesnt make sense
No offence to anyone but personally i do not like sense. Hell ! even my friends with htc dont like it cuz it eats resources and battery! Id take CM10 or 10.1 over sense anyday . If we are talking about launchers , I feel the need for a customized version of trebuchet in which there is an option for rearranging icons and making folders in the menu.
Bhavik Jain said:
So d point is we wont get sense
Sent from my GT-I9103 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not now wait for all the devs to make their rom stable
Kartik pat said:
Not now wait for all the devs to make their rom stable
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
but den in the guide it says we can use cm7 for ports. Instead cant we use cm 10/10.1?
Sent from my GT-I9103 using xda premium
I wanted to know this.
As said "Porting official JB of SGS2"
Will that be like an official JB to our phone without samsungs permission?
As in can we make it something without using root access or anything?
I am very desperate to get official JB because i am scared of using ROMs.
I have tried them all (PAC, CAMP, SLIM, CM10.1) but then the root and custom mods which voids the warranty makes me feel insecured.
Because what if my charging jack died on me and im not able to revert to the stock rom. Has happened once. So...
Sent from my GT-I9103 using xda premium
DeepankarS said:
I wanted to know this.
As said "Porting official JB of SGS2"
Will that be like an official JB to our phone without samsungs permission?
As in can we make it something without using root access or anything?
I am very desperate to get official JB because i am scared of using ROMs.
I have tried them all (PAC, CAMP, SLIM, CM10.1) but then the root and custom mods which voids the warranty makes me feel insecured.
Because what if my charging jack died on me and im not able to revert to the stock rom. Has happened once. So...
Sent from my GT-I9103 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
U simply cannot port it from SGS2 bro.. Our SGR h/w is entirely different from SGS2.. It aint possible for us to port from other devices.. If we have to port jelly bean, then Samsung have to release a source for us or build jelly bean for us which is highly unlikely..
sudhindrakv said:
U simply cannot port it from SGS2 bro.. Our SGR h/w is entirely different from SGS2.. It aint possible for us to port from other devices.. If we have to port jelly bean, then Samsung have to release a source for us or build jelly bean for us which is highly unlikely..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I know this.. :'(
That is why i am still unhappy :'(
And so i just asked this..
Making something which does not require root access..
Is this IMPOSSIBLE?
Sent from my GT-I9103 using xda premium
DeepankarS said:
Making something which does not require root access..
Is this IMPOSSIBLE?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I didn't get you ... what exactly you want...
mj.vikram said:
I didn't get you ... what exactly you want...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wait.
I messed it all up.
Mj, samsung has a problem with anything custom than root access right?
As in samsung voids warranty if we use anything CUSTOM, be it rooted or unrooted?
[QUERY] Is there any device having h/w exactly matching to our SGR?
Sent from my GT-I9103 using xda premium
DeepankarS said:
[QUERY] Is there any device having h/w exactly matching to our SGR?
Sent from my GT-I9103 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nope, there's no anything like a twin brother, unfortunatelly. Even LG Optimus 2x differs a lot.
m.kochan10 said:
Nope, there's no anything like a twin brother, unfortunatelly. Even LG Optimus 2x differs a lot.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I wouldnt have been so stupid had i studied android/linux.
Finance people you see..
But still i am like..
Why cant we modify stock s2 jb rom or any other stock jb rom and make it compatible with our device.
Tell me why because i dont know anything about porting.
Okay agreed at a point that hardware does not match..it is completely different..
But cant those things be edited so as to make compatible?
Sent from my GT-I9103 using xda premium
Nobody said its impossible. Its just super-difficult. We cannot port official JB for approx the same reason why we couldn't port the official ICS. Samsung implements a completely different set of framework and libraries for each of its devices depending on what its hardware is. If you wanted to port an official Samsung ROM you would have to re-write most of these framework and library files which are hardware dependent, which eventually culminates into a mountain of work. Sound Good?
The-Droidster said:
Nobody said its impossible. Its just super-difficult. We cannot port official JB for approx the same reason why we couldn't port the official ICS. Samsung implements a completely different set of framework and libraries for each of its devices depending on what its hardware is. If you wanted to port an official Samsung ROM you would have to re-write most of these framework and library files which are hardware dependent, which eventually culminates into a mountain of work. Sound Good?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is THE BEST EXPLAINATION i could ever get.
So like if 10 or more devs work together on a particular stock rom..then only we can have it all?
Then another question is why would any dev waste time on stock roms when they can make better roms
Bdw it sounds tough..doing must be tougher.
Sent from my GT-I9103 using xda premium

Categories

Resources