Related
I want to know what is the best format to convert videos for ppc so i can get best combination of quality and performance, size dosnt matter for me.
I am alao looking for the best practice guide.... so i can learn how to get smooth video playback.
H.264. Read my H.264 Bible, it exaplains everything.
Thanks I am looking for your bible.
I think I may have overlooked something obvious, but where is your bible?
I'm having terrible trouble getting decent video playback on my i-mate 9502
Here guys
http://www.allaboutsymbian.com/forum/showthread.php?t=67863
It seems you can't expect much from the 9502 - it doesn't have working drivers either - see http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=351788&page=8
You could give CorePlayer a try, though
I still have a problem that I have a wmv which play smoothly on my pc but now I convert it to h.264 but it still lagy (as before) on my wizard.
Do you use CorePlayer?
Did you try optimizing (bo Cabac etc?)
I am using core player latest build but I dont know about "optimizing (bo Cabac etc?)"
Can you explain me?
btw I convert the video from xilisoft in 320 res
azfar said:
I am using core player latest build but I dont know about "optimizing (bo Cabac etc?)"
Can you explain me?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've explained this all in the H.264 Bible... there're a lot of areas of optimization.
BTW, the Wizard is VERY slow. Therefore, I recommend not only goig for CorePlayer, but also sticking to DivX if the increased storage requirements aren't a problem.
you mean divx codec, not player right?
azfar said:
you mean divx codec, not player right?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Both. You need to encode your stuff with DivX and play back preferably with TCPMP or, even better, CorePlayer.
I switched my 9502's coreplayer setings to RawFramebuffer and now it plays QVGA video at an acceptable 24fps / 500kbps no problem. Still seems to hate VGA video though, but I guess that's a non-issue until they bring out the SDHC patch.
mike freegan said:
I switched my 9502's coreplayer setings to RawFramebuffer and now it plays QVGA video at an acceptable 24fps / 500kbps no problem. Still seems to hate VGA video though, but I guess that's a non-issue until they bring out the SDHC patch.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
any other core player video settings for better performance?
The H.264 codec is not a good choice for playback on slower devices. If you flip though the h.264 bible (linked below) you'll see that even a 330 MHz OMAP (N95) isn't able to handle a h.264 video 100% without disabling features. You haven't got a chance with a 200 MHz OMAP and your going to have high CPU utilization with a 400 MHz CPU.
http://www.aximsite.com/boards/applications/222389-h-264-k-mpeg-4-part-10-avc-bible.html
If size is not a factor, then you're not gaining anything by using h.264. The main benefit of h.264 over XviD is better quality at the same size or same quality at a lower size. XviD/DivX has much lower compression complexity and requires less CPU power/utilization to decode but ends up taking more space.
If you have a fast processor and you want the best quality at the smallest size, go with h.264/AVC. If size is not a factor, stick with XviD/DivX(ASP). Even with a fast processor, you will have lower CPU utilization and longer battery life (assuming you are using CPU scaling).
Check out my guide if you want some help converting to XviD.
http://forum.videohelp.com/topic349738.html
trueg said:
The H.264 codec is not a good choice for playback on slower devices. If you flip though the h.264 bible (linked below) you'll see that even a 300 MHz OMAP (N95) isn't able to handle a h.264 video 100% without disabling features. You haven't got a chance with a 200 MHz OMAP and your going to have high CPU utilization with a 400 MHz CPU.
http://www.aximsite.com/boards/applications/222389-h-264-k-mpeg-4-part-10-avc-bible.html
If size is not a factor, then you're not gaining anything by using h.264. The main benefit of h.264 over XviD is better quality at the same size or same quality at a lower size. XviD/DivX has much lower compression complexity and requires less CPU power/utilization to decode but ends up taking more space.
If you have a fast processor and you want the best quality at the smallest size, go with h.264/AVC. If size is not a factor, stick with XviD/DivX(ASP). Even with a fast processor, you will have lower CPU utilization and longer battery life (assuming you are using CPU scaling).
Check out my guide if you want some help converting to XviD.
http://forum.videohelp.com/topic349738.html
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
unfortunately the software you refer doesnt support wmv conversion.
Well, honestly I've never needed to convert a wmv(ASF) video before. I never would have thought it would not accept WMV files, but I downloaded a music video to test and indeed, even when forced, PocketDivxEncoder wouldn't accept it. I then tried AutoGK which is another high quality converter/front end and it also would not accept WMV files (I would assume the same for Gordon Knot).
To aid you in your quest, I went on a search for tools to help you in your task.
Tools tested....
AllToAVI - http://www.videohelp.com/tools/alltoavi - easy to install, fairly intuitive, fast encoding, no option for cropping or rotation, limited audio options.
--I ran a quick test on my wmv music video using AllToAVI. The original WMV did not play very well (worse than a slide show) on my HTC Touch (Elfin - 201Mhz OMAP). The resulting XVID was actually the same size, but played perfectly.
WinFF - http://www.videohelp.com/tools/WinFF - easy to install, minimalist interface (very limited), fast encoding. Unlike AllToAVI, WinFF did not analyze the source or make suggestions on video frame rate or aspect ratio. It worked well enough and the resulting XVID looked as good and played as well as the file created by AllToAVI.
MediaCoder - http://www.videohelp.com/tools/MediaCoder - wow, this program is pretty amazing. Easy to install, tons of options, fast encoding. This program is much more customizable than PocketDivXEncoder, but this is to be expected. This program can convert from pretty much any codec to pretty much any codec. There are options for pretty much every aspect of the conversion process (which may be too much for some people). The resultant video was again the same size, but quality was a bit higher since I was able to crop the black bars.
Basically, if you can use PocketDivXEncoder (i.e. your video is supported) stick with it since it is fast, high quality and easy to use. If you want the ability to customize every single aspect of the conversion, use Media Coder. If you can't use PocketDivXEncoder and you want something very simply to convert your unsupported video, give AllToAVI a shot.
many thanks for your efforts. I am tryijgnall those convertors and will let you know the results.
can I play the 700MB dvdrip (.avi divx) version of movie on pda. Can it handle it?
I have constructed some video tests and the preliminary data I am getting back is that the Touch Pro is not great when it comes to video playback. Not at the moment anyway. Though my tests were done with the latest Coreplayer I would extrapolate that the results are indicative of the overall video performance irrespective of the player used.
File 1: Mpeg-4 ASP Xvid 320x160 287 kbps
File 2: Mpeg-4 ASP Xvid 640x320 479 kbps
File 3: Mpeg-4 AVC x264 320x160 200 kbps
File 4: Mpeg-4 AVC x264 640x320 400 kbps
All audio is AAC 24 KHz 64 kbps.
Device: HTC Raphael
CPU&Clock: Qualcomm MSM7201A 528MHz
GPU: N/A (integrated ARM926EJ-S [email protected])
ROM: WM6.1 FireROM v0.3
File 1: 205.40%
File 2: 126.52%
File 3: 159.63%
File 4: 68.29%
Device: HTC Hermes
CPU&Clock: Samsung SC32442A ARM 400MHz
GPU: ATI Imageon 2282
ROM: WM6.1 PDACornerPro v25 RBSN
File 1: 387%
File 2: 140%
File 3: 114%
File 4: 34%
I don't know how much the video performance can be improved with newer ROMS or optimised software but I think it will take a while before any drastic improvements are seen, if ever. I have the video files available for those would like to test this for themselves and can PM the links. They short clips might be considered copyrighted so I will not post them.
Hmm
I have some DVD rips which were encoded for use on the Sony PSP, with the following attributes:
Format: MPEG4
Video: AVC aka H.264
Video Size: 480 x 272
Frame Rate: 29.970
Audio: MPEG4 AAC Audio
Audio Format: 96000Hz 2 Ch
I figured it'd be useful to be able to play those rips on my TP, so I tried it using Coreplayer v1.2.5.
There was no sound - I cannot fix this and have raised a ticket with Coreplayer support.
Nevertheless, the benchmark gave an average speed of 101.90% so that's not too bad.
Has anyone else tried these types of files on their TP using Coreplayer? Have you managed to get any sound?
The thread title should be changed into:
"Don't expect great video from CorePlayer on your Raphael."
The problem is not the Raphael. The problem is the CorePlayer! At least when playing MP4 files. I've tested several MP4 files and the CorePlayer is playing them choppy while the WMP Mobile has no problems!
As I've posted in the topic with touch pro issues:
poor directdraw, framebuffer/video performance.
Just to make an idea: an old device from 2005 with omap 850 200mhz CPU performs better in this area than the touch pro @ qualcomm 528mhz. what a shame. The test were done in this topic (in romanian, sorry). CorePlayer was used for benchmark. I will summarize.
- HTC Tornado overclocked (262Mhz) max performance: 174.22%
- Touch Pro max performance: 172,67%
Both in Raw framebuffer mode. When used QTV it gains only 162,64%. How come?
It's pitty, 262Mhz from OMAP performs better than 528!!!Mhz from Qualcomm?!
The video used for tests is this one. (320x240 @ 25FPS)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Of course, this may be fixed with software optimization.. But it's kinda annoying that the existing 3rd-party doesn't work so well..
I saw in a romanian review that touch pro is under diamond at Graphics index.
diamond: 1662.31
touch pro: 357.03
more: http://www.chip.ro/stiri/hardware/review:_htc_touch_pro/22135 (go to bottom)
peterbonge said:
The thread title should be changed into:
"Don't expect great video from CorePlayer on your Raphael."
The problem is not the Raphael. The problem is the CorePlayer! At least when playing MP4 files. I've tested several MP4 files and the CorePlayer is playing them choppy while the WMP Mobile has no problems!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
All the .mp4 files I transcoded played fine in Coreplayer. The container (.mp4, .avi) is not the problem it's what is inside. Anything benchmarking over a 100% will play smoothly. I will PM you the links to my clips and you can tell me how they all play in both WMP and Coreplayer.
DSF said:
touch pro is under diamond at Graphics index.
diamond: 1662.31
touch pro: 357.03
more: http://www.chip.ro/stiri/hardware/review:_htc_touch_pro/22135 (go to bottom)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is concerning. I want a device where I don't have to worry about converting video any more.
Wam7 said:
All the .mp4 files I transcoded played fine in Coreplayer. The container (.mp4, .avi) is not the problem it's what is inside. Anything benchmarking over a 100% will play smoothly. I will PM you the links to my clips and you can tell me how they all play in both WMP and Coreplayer.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
With WMP the first two are running fine, the last two have just sound without a picture. The codec (H.264/MPEG-4 AVC) is not the problem because I have many vids with this codec running fine.
I don't have the time to test the files with the CorePlayer at the moment, but here are the specs of a file which runs choppy with the CorePlayer, but fine with the WMP:
Video: avc1 / H.264/MPEG-4 AVC / 480 x 360 / 509 kbps / 29.971 fps
Audio: mp4a: MPEG-4 AAC LC / 44100Hz 123 kbps, stereo
The problem of the current releases of coreplayer is that the QTV driver provided is not the one for the MSM7201A processor; it's the one of the TyTnII (MSM7200 If I'm not mistaken).
To fully exploit the "graphic accelerator" of our TPs I think we'll have to wait for an optimized version of coreplayer for our HTCs (coreplayer 1.3 as anounced in their website, as they say that a version optimized for Touchs will be released soon).
I've contacted HTC support about video performance.
Answer in short: "The Touch Pro is not made for playing Media. It was made as a business device."
TyTN was made as a business device and included ATI Imageon GPU.
Hmm...guess I learnt something new today. I always thought hardware wise the Touch Pro would be the same if not better than Diamond, i.e. whatever videos the Diamond can play, the Touh Pro can do just as well. But looking at the site provided in Mike's post, I'm guessing that's not the case.
phrozact said:
Hmm...guess I learnt something new today. I always thought hardware wise the Touch Pro would be the same if not better than Diamond, i.e. whatever videos the Diamond can play, the Touh Pro can do just as well. But looking at the site provided in Mike's post, I'm guessing that's not the case.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I really think there's some kind of error regarding graphics benchmark results there, since Touch Pro has the same CPU, the same 3D accelerator and more RAM !
seether said:
I really think there's some kind of error regarding graphics benchmark results there, since Touch Pro has the same CPU, the same 3D accelerator and more RAM !
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Someone could give it a try with another video. I don't have a TP yet ot I'd try it.
Basically I want to be able to throw a 600mb, VGA resolution file from my computer straight onto an SD card and watch it on the go without having to bother about conversions. Is this not possible?
mike freegan said:
Someone could give it a try with another video. I don't have a TP yet ot I'd try it.
Basically I want to be able to throw a 600mb, VGA resolution file from my computer straight onto an SD card and watch it on the go without having to bother about conversions. Is this not possible?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I havent tried this yet, but I will once I get back home tomorrow.. Would be awesome if that worked!
EDIT: Loading in a episode of Dexter (original release, DVDScr.XVID) on, and installing TCMP.. Il post results!
Loaded "Dexter.S03E01.DVDScr.XviD-NOTYOU.avi" onto my memory card and played it in TCPMP and it worked more or less flawlessly!! No need to worry about playback performance! Although to get 100% perfect playback, it should be converted or something as the playback did suffer som slight stutters from time to time.
EDIT: The only thing this device suffers from in terms of video playback is 65k colors.
err that's weird look at the results posted at these sites:
http://img2.portavik.net/upload/file_23/37bd53de9a906fe4/table_bench.gif
and this one:
http://www.ferra.ru/online/communicators/80844/ (in the middle of a page SPB test
Guys sorry, but what are u trying to play in Raphael, that this device is not so powerful for you?
I watched almost 20 movies (DivX for PC) / series on Raphael and withou any problem. Video is smooth, great and thats it...
P.S. I am watching movies on CorePlayer
MaRaHoX said:
Guys sorry, but what are u trying to play in Raphael, that this device is not so powerful for you?
I watched almost 20 movies (DivX for PC) / series on Raphael and withou any problem. Video is smooth, great and thats it...
P.S. I am watching movies on CorePlayer
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
When I tried to load up Dexter.S03E01.DVDScr.XviD-NOTYOU with CorePlayer, I only got audio, no video... But TCPMP worked quite well..
yeah im searching for proper video settings to convert files to for my device using catalyst or pocketdivx encoder, still searching on that one.
but then i tried just throwing my original episode of entourage and yeah it looks awesome., will probably do that more often with the faster file transfer and once i get a bigger sd card.
The firmware drivers do need a bit of work and coreplayer 1.2.5 doesn't fully support the touch pro as the makers have made clear.
I would suggest waiting for coreplayer 1.3 and maybe a few newer ROMs before giving final judgement, though Qtv specs on the qualcom chips do say it maxes out at 640x480 15-30fps 384kbps if i remember right.
FYI: Qtv is a software codec specifically designed for maximum performance on the 7201a chipset used by the touch pro. This is what coreplayer does not fully support yet (unlike on the TyTN).
Also, regarding HTC's response, why don't you ask the same question again but about the Touch Diamond, as it's not a business device.
seether said:
I really think there's some kind of error regarding graphics benchmark results there, since Touch Pro has the same CPU, the same 3D accelerator and more RAM !
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What 3D accelerator does the Pro/Diamond use? What chip?
Hi
Are there any solutions yet ?. I'm currently converting a 42min (TV ep) 1280x720 mkv to a 1280x720 mp4 using Handbrake but it took 30mins. Is anyone else doing something similar if so does a more powerful computer speed up the process considerably ?.
How about streaming the mkv's, is that possible at the moment ?.
Thanks,
Edit: I've found a way to stream content to the transformer.
I'm currently using plex and am able to stream 720p mkv's no problem. It's the best $5 I've spent for a while. It's pretty CPU intensive (85-95%) if your computer has an old processor like mine (AMD X2 4200+).
You'll need the server software and the android program.
Windows - http://www.plexapp.com/pc.php
Mac - http://www.plexapp.com/mac.php
Android - https://market.android.com/details?id=com.plexapp.android
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Well you do need to have the 720p files in a H264 MP4 which the Tegra 2 can hardware playback. Otherwise the software playback is jerky.
Mr Paul said:
Well you do need to have the 720p files in a H264 MP4 which the Tegra 2 can hardware playback. Otherwise the software playback is jerky.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
MKV files can have the videos encoded in H264 you just need software that can open that container. MKV allows for the encoding of multiple audio tracks and subtitle tracks.
To the OP have you downloaded Rock Player from the market it's supposed to open MKV files. But like the poster I replied to said if your files don't have hte video encoded in H264 your playback may suffer.
I stream all video files onto my nexus (80% of which are mkv) through ORB. Download it onto your main media computer, import the folders, etc. On Android, the app sucks, but you can go through the website, change the settings to flash player, and it streams well. Definitely clunky way to do it, but it works. If I'm on 3G, I set the data speed to 1200 in the settings and it works fine with no skips.
Most non-anime 720p MKV's that i have, i prefer to transcode (not convert) on my Mac using Quicktime Pro 7 because they already conform to h.264/avchd spec anyway but are just wrapped in the MKV container. This takes my (Mac Mini 2.26 Core2Duo) minutes, as in 10 minutes sometimes, because all QT Pro 7 is doing is just changing the audio codec to AAC.
Now ofcourse most MKV's i usually download are anime, usually with soft subs (which i dislike, i prefer them burned in) and this is where Handbrake comes in. It's the most convenient app i've found to take MKV's with soft subs, convert them to mp4 and burn in the subs (just the way i like). Ofcourse this process involves converting the MKV which is what takes some time because Handbrake is a CPU intensive app, the faster your CPU, the faster it gets it done.
If you have a computer with an NVIDIA CUDA capable graphics card, there's an app called Badaboom that utilizes the GPU for video conversion to just straight mp4, which converts on a magnitude many times faster than just CPU alone.
I've used it on a friend's PC and it's astounding how fast it converts.
When Moboplayer or the others will support Tegra2 we won't have this problem anymore...until then looks like we can only convert...
Knight77 said:
When Moboplayer or the others will support Tegra2 we won't have this problem anymore...until then looks like we can only convert...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've read that tegra is unable to play mkv's at 720p & 1080p due to hardware limitations. I hope what you say is right though
mug2k said:
I've read that tegra is unable to play mkv's at 720p & 1080p due to hardware limitations. I hope what you say is right though
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
From my experience I had with the Adam and reading around, Tegra likes the MP4 container much better than H.264, if you have troubles with your videos, try switching it up in handbrake.
I'd recommend transcoding a small section of video (5 minutes...) into various formats and see which you find works best.
Knight77 said:
When Moboplayer or the others will support Tegra2 we won't have this problem anymore...until then looks like we can only convert...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Very much doubt it. I just tried 720p high profile video on Athlon 2Ghz and it was decoding but with some problems (I had to change some settings for it not to stutter). I doubt Tegra2 is fast enough to compete with good old Athlon 2000+ (in SunSpider test this Athlon was 2x faster than Tegra2 tablets - I know, not a good comparison). The only hope is that it could be done partially in hardware - then maybe...
Magnesus said:
Very much doubt it. I just tried 720p high profile video on Athlon 2Ghz and it was decoding but with some problems (I had to change some settings for it not to stutter). I doubt Tegra2 is fast enough to compete with good old Athlon 2000+ (in SunSpider test this Athlon was 2x faster than Tegra2 tablets - I know, not a good comparison). The only hope is that it could be done partially in hardware - then maybe...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
not a fair comparison since athlon doesnt have hardware acceleration for video decoders AFAIK and tegra 2 does.
seshmaru said:
not a fair comparison since athlon doesnt have hardware acceleration for video decoders AFAIK and tegra 2 does.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The question is - can they be used for high profile to help software decoding?
Hasn't it been a known fact that Tegra 2 device cannot do 720p+ high profile?
It has been many months since the release of Tegra 2 devices and so far no fix or update has been done, which leads me to believe that it is a hardware related issue. Tegra 3 devices coming late summer to early fall should take care of this. It is also 5x faster than Tegra 2 and will have neon support.
mug2k said:
I've read that tegra is unable to play mkv's at 720p & 1080p due to hardware limitations. I hope what you say is right though
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
MKV is just a container, Samsung and some no-name OEM PMP's have added The Matroska container to their build of Android (And they don't have to release the source because it's part of the framework not the kernel) that is all that's needed
All the Tegra 2 sees is the audio and video stream after the container has been parsed. If we had the honeycomb source we could add MKV parsing (As the omapzoom project has done here: http://git.omapzoom.org/?p=platform...46c99805033f35023ee;hb=refs/heads/gingerbread)
But that would still limit us to whatever the Nvidia HW acceleration binaries can handle decoding. The tegra2 _should_ be able to decode 720p High profile (EDIT, I may be wrong about High profile) and 1080p Main profile, but the current Nvidia binaries can only handle 1080p baseline profile. (The older froyo binaries for the harmony board can handle 720p main profile)
tegra 2 doesn't have a problem with hd video, just hd video using high profile. hd is a resolution, not a container, not an encoding profile, nor a codec.
its a very big draw back that tegra 2 can't handle high profile video as weaker tablets have no problems. my galaxy tab and archos 101 both do high profile 3.1 [email protected], as does the iPad with xbmc.
So the power is there but isn't unlocked ?, but can it be unlocked if nvidia chooses ?.
mug2k said:
So the power is there but isn't unlocked ?, but can it be unlocked if nvidia chooses ?.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The "power" is not there in regards to high profile video 720p and up, since it is a hardware limitation. The bad thing is 99% of online 720p and 1080p content are high profile. High profile is popular because it yields greater definition, higher clarity, and is half the bandwidth. File sizes are also smaller too, at about 4 times less.
The GPU is the weak link for the Tegra 2.
evilPERSOn2009 said:
The "power" is not there in regards to high profile video 720p and up, since it is a hardware limitation.
The GPU is the weak link for the Tegra 2.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What's the quickest option to get from the high profile to a profile that will work ?. Is a full conversion needed ?.
mug2k said:
What's the quickest option to get from the high profile to a profile that will work ?. Is a full conversion needed ?.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Using Handbrake, it takes anywhere from 15 minutes to hours depending how fast your computer's CPU is.
evilPERSOn2009 said:
Using Handbrake, it takes anywhere from 15 minutes to hours depending how fast your computer's CPU is.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
lol my PC is so old I can't even get net framework 3.5 onwards installed so that's a non starter. How long does a typical conversion take for you and what hardware are you running ?.
mug2k said:
lol my PC is so old I can't even get net framework 3.5 onwards installed so that's a non starter. How long does a typical conversion take for you and what hardware are you running ?.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My Q6600 3.5Ghz, 8GB, GTX580 takes on average of about 2 hours to convert a movie at 720p high profile lvl 4.1 to baseline, which is a *****.
I need to get a new i7 2600k setup.
Also since this non high profile video have larger size a lot of time they go over the 4gb limitation of the fat32 filesystem.
I learned from reading this forum that i9500 can be better for listening music, however I have few doubts:
1. Hi resolution audio files which I listen to most require more processor power for unpacking. For example 800Mhz CPU does well job for unpacking medium compressed 24/192,000hz FLAC file in real time, however if I get Audio Monkey file with same quality but compressed as insane, then 800Mhz processor can't do the job. However Intel Celeron 1.5Ghz and 64 bits does the job right. All tests were done using JVM. So how 1.6Ghz Cortex is comparable with Celeron 1.5Ghz ?
2. Android limits sample size to 16 bits, (no AudioFormat ENCODING_PCM_24BIT constant provided even in kitkat). So additional processor power will be required for resampling and dithering. So again question is for APE 24/192 insane compressed, can Cortex take additional job for DSP?
Can somebody who owns i9500 confirm that the phone has enough power comfortably manage hi end music files in APE and WAVPACK formats?
I use Kamerton for my testing, but similar results were reported for Neutron, so if you have the former, then your data will be same helpful.
I would be happy to test it for you.
Can you please attach the file you want us to test?
UPDATE - CPUz app said it was a dual core ARM CORTEX-A9 1.5 GHz, revision r3p0
Galaxy tab 3 has the same processor
Asus memo pad has it, but 4 core
Hello all,
I was in thailand and my phone died so I got a cheap $45 tablet to use whatsapp to talk to family and friends. I read asus makes the devices - I'm assuming that someone made this tablet for the company that sold it and that it's a little better than a cheap Chinese tablet quality bc it has had no issues and seems pretty good and was offered by a respected phone company over there. I wanted to upgrade to a newer Rom >4.2, now that I am back in the states.
1.) I had an adnroid stick PC and it seemed like the sticks where all the same chipset and then had roms you could load on them regardless of their brand. Are there universal roms I could look into.
2.) I'm not sure how hard it would be to make a CM rom for this device , but I did see that they have a link to create a build.
I'm going to try one-click, Kingo root, king root, etc to see if I can unlock it so I can turn off the telephony.apk and phone.apk since this one did not have a sim card and was wifi only. The manuf didn't delete those apps so they keep draining the battery looking for service.
Your help is appreciated and thanks in advance!
Device http://product.i-mobilephone.com/1573_
Brand - I-mobile = http://www.i-mobilephone.com/
Brand Wiki https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I-Mobile
Model I-tab DTV (I wish they had DTV-T2 here, it was great quality in Bangkok on this thing
Android 4.2.2
Chipset - 1.5 GHz dual core - I can't find the chip type/brand anywhere, but was going to start looking through Asus's website to find a similar device.
Click translate on this site to see specs or see info below: http://www.siamphone.com/spec/i-mobile/i-tab_dtv.htm
device on youtube - https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=Imobile+itab+dtv+review
Computer information
tablet
Display Ultra AMOLED 24-bit (16 million colors)
- Touch Multi-Touch
- a 7-inch (diagonal directions)
- Resolution: 1024 x 600 pixels
- Capacitive.
Sensors (Sensor)
- Automatic image rotation system. (Accelerometer)
- on / off the screen automatically when a call (Proximity).
Operating System (OS, CPU).
Operating system: Android 4.2 (Jelly Bean).
Processor: Dual Core - Speed: 1.5 GHz.
Memory
- 8GB ROM
- 1GB RAM.
Memory cards microSD - up to 32 GB.
Interconnected System
Positioning: Assisted GPS
WiFi
Bluetooth 3.0
Micro USB 2.0
HDMI (for TV input signal).
3.5 mm headset jack.
Multimedia Functions
The built-in TV tuner (TV Tuner).
TV tuner in the DVB-H DVB T2.
5 megapixel digital camera (Digital Camera)
- AF (Auto Focus).
Camera (Front Camera)
- 2-megapixel resolution.
Save video animations (Video Recording).
Video (Video Player)
- File Format: MPEG-4
- Supports video from YouTube ™.
Music (Music Player)
- file formats: MP3.
Radio FM Radio
Battery
Standard Battery 4,000 mAh (Standard Battery).
stewbuntu said:
UPDATE - CPUz app said it was a dual core ARM CORTEX-A9 1.5 GHz, revision r3p0
Galaxy tab 3 has the same processor
Asus memo pad has it, but 4 core
Hello all,
I was in thailand and my phone died so I got a cheap $45 tablet to use whatsapp to talk to family and friends. I read asus makes the devices - I'm assuming that someone made this tablet for the company that sold it and that it's a little better than a cheap Chinese tablet quality bc it has had no issues and seems pretty good and was offered by a respected phone company over there. I wanted to upgrade to a newer Rom >4.2, now that I am back in the states.
1.) I had an adnroid stick PC and it seemed like the sticks where all the same chipset and then had roms you could load on them regardless of their brand. Are there universal roms I could look into.
2.) I'm not sure how hard it would be to make a CM rom for this device , but I did see that they have a link to create a build.
I'm going to try one-click, Kingo root, king root, etc to see if I can unlock it so I can turn off the telephony.apk and phone.apk since this one did not have a sim card and was wifi only. The manuf didn't delete those apps so they keep draining the battery looking for service.
Your help is appreciated and thanks in advance!
Device http://product.i-mobilephone.com/1573_
Brand - I-mobile = http://www.i-mobilephone.com/
Brand Wiki https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I-Mobile
Model I-tab DTV (I wish they had DTV-T2 here, it was great quality in Bangkok on this thing
Android 4.2.2
Chipset - 1.5 GHz dual core - I can't find the chip type/brand anywhere, but was going to start looking through Asus's website to find a similar device.
Click translate on this site to see specs or see info below: http://www.siamphone.com/spec/i-mobile/i-tab_dtv.htm
device on youtube - https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=Imobile+itab+dtv+review
Computer information
tablet
Display Ultra AMOLED 24-bit (16 million colors)
- Touch Multi-Touch
- a 7-inch (diagonal directions)
- Resolution: 1024 x 600 pixels
- Capacitive.
Sensors (Sensor)
- Automatic image rotation system. (Accelerometer)
- on / off the screen automatically when a call (Proximity).
Operating System (OS, CPU).
Operating system: Android 4.2 (Jelly Bean).
Processor: Dual Core - Speed: 1.5 GHz.
Memory
- 8GB ROM
- 1GB RAM.
Memory cards microSD - up to 32 GB.
Interconnected System
Positioning: Assisted GPS
WiFi
Bluetooth 3.0
Micro USB 2.0
HDMI (for TV input signal).
3.5 mm headset jack.
Multimedia Functions
The built-in TV tuner (TV Tuner).
TV tuner in the DVB-H DVB T2.
5 megapixel digital camera (Digital Camera)
- AF (Auto Focus).
Camera (Front Camera)
- 2-megapixel resolution.
Save video animations (Video Recording).
Video (Video Player)
- File Format: MPEG-4
- Supports video from YouTube ™.
Music (Music Player)
- file formats: MP3.
Radio FM Radio
Battery
Standard Battery 4,000 mAh (Standard Battery).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Greetings,
Thank you for using XDA Assist.
For best results, please post your question here:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/android/help
You'll receive expert advice there.
Good luck!