@rayman84
Yes, this is in the wrong forum. But im a 'noob' and I cannot post/reply in the dev sections just yet. Please move this thread to the relevant section.
Or better yet, add it as a reply to this thread: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1290503&page=1
First, some history:
The SBKDetect binary can be used in a 32bit Linux environment to grab some useful information for our brainy dev's.
In this instance, the dev team are asking for people who own Asus TF101/TF101G with serials beginning with B70 or B80 to run this binary while their tablet is in APX mode and copy/paste the results in the thread.
To run the binary in a 64bit enviro all you need to do is install ia32-libs
User 'thorntree' was experiencing problems running this binary in his 64bit Ubuntu enviro and was receiving the error
Code:
./sbkcheck: error while loading shared libraries: libusb-1.0.so.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
My TF101G has a serial beginning with B90. I dont think there are any other users with a B90 that have run sbkcheck, so im very keen to run it. As im sure the devs are keen to get the results from this B90 TF101G.
---
Now the juicy bit:
(Disclaimer: I am by no meaNow the juicy bit:ns a Linux expert, so the process I went through below may be incorrect, but I seem to have made *some* headway, hopefully someone else can clean up and finish it off)
I was also experiencing this error on my 64bit Ubuntu (BackTrack5, actually) enviro.
- lsusb confirmed that my device is in APX mode.
- Using Aptitude I reinstalled libusb-1.0 and ia32-libs, this isnt the issue
- A find revealed that libusb-1.0.so.0 can be found in /lib and /usr/lib
- a 'strings sbkcheck' shows:
Code:
/lib/ld-linux.so.2
libusb-1.0.so.0
- So I assume that the binary is looking for the lib in /usr/lib32 as it doesnt specify an absolute path, sure enough, the file doesnt exist in /usr/lib32
- 'ln -s libusb-1.0.so.0 /usr/lib32/libusb-1.0.so.0' gives me error:
Code:
./sbkcheck: error while loading shared libraries: libusb-1.0.so.0: wrong ELF class: ELFCLASS64
(We are on the right track!)
- ls of /usr/lib32 shows a similar file 'libusb-0.1.so.4', so I removed the previous link and did a 'ln -s libusb-0.1.so.4 libusb-1.0.so.0'
- Now the error we get is:
Code:
./sbkcheck: symbol lookup error: ./sbkcheck: undefined symbol: libusb_init
- A strings of sbkcheck and libusb-0.1.so.4 shows that sbkcheck uses 'libusb_init' and libusb-0.1.so.4 uses 'usb_init'
- Changing either file above causes a 'Segmentation fault'
This is where I am stuck... Like I said, im not Linux expert or coder, but im guessing sbkcheck needs to be modified and recompiled so that is uses 'usb_init' instead of 'libusb_init' and it should work.
Hope the above helps...
Can one of you wonderful moderators please move this thread to where it belongs? Thanks!
I think you should get the 32 bit package, extract its contents, and manually copy the libusb.ko (the correct one), to /usr/lib32. The package you are looking for should be this one: http://packages.ubuntu.com/lucid/libusb-1.0-0, just get the i386 version and copy/link over. Should work.
The ELF class error is because you are trying to load a 64 bit library into/from a 32 bit application, which won't work. The other error is because that's not the library it's looking for, and thus it doesn't find what it needs.
Hope that helps
As the most of you probably know the Gear 2's sources are released by Samsung over here: http://opensource.samsung.com/reception/receptionSub.do?method=sub&sub=F&searchValue=r381
Are there amongst you who already started the development of custom software for this device or who have experience with Tizen's source code?
What I want to know right now:
How do I compile these sources?
Found information:
I found this guide (https://source.tizen.org/documentat...ctions/creating-tizen-images-scratch-one-page) which describes how to compile Tizen from scratch.
[UPDATE: 21/6/14] So we figured out you need a 32 bit Ubuntu install to be able to compile these files.
How can I push the compiled code to the Gear 2?
Found information:
Probably the tools provided with the Tizen SDK have the ability to create a rom package which we can deploy (Am I right here?) to the Smartwatch with Odin (http://forum.xda-developers.com/gal...08-2013-odin-3-09-odin-1-85-versions-t2189539). For the people unfamiliar with flashing watches (like me), here is how you set the watch in download mode: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EXT7kr3j2Ac.
Where do I have to start modding these sources to eventually be able to create an open platform for the Gear 2?
All help is appreciated!
Thanks
We probably have to see if we can even flash anything without modifications
CovXX said:
We probably have to see if we can even flash anything without modifications
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This weekend I'm going to experiment with the source to see if I can compile it. I'll keep ya updated on the progress!
Corstian said:
This weekend I'm going to experiment with the source to see if I can compile it. I'll keep ya updated on the progress!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
have you made any progress ??? even at emulated level ????
gav-collins1983 said:
have you made any progress ??? even at emulated level ????
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I was stuck on compiling the source. My Ubuntu installation gives errors which say that it can't execute binary files. Also, on my primary PC I don't have enough free space on my hard disk to install Ubuntu. So after a while other stuff came through and I stopped trying around.
Whatsoever, I still have Gear 2 which is useless to me and you just motivated me to continue the journey
Btw, all help is appreciated
Corstian said:
I was stuck on compiling the source. My Ubuntu installation gives errors which say that it can't execute binary files. Also, on my primary PC I don't have enough free space on my hard disk to install Ubuntu. So after a while other stuff came through and I stopped trying around.
Whatsoever, I still have Gear 2 which is useless to me and you just motivated me to continue the journey
Btw, all help is appreciated
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have linux kali set up. On a vm on one of my machines. But I've only just started to learn linux. And my god there is a lot to learn. Once I get my wireless adaptor running in kali. Which I've had a little trouble with. And not a lot of time . I can maybe help. Even if it means installing Ubuntu onto another of my laptops . I just feel a little useless not knowing all the jargon for Linux as yet. Cmd is complicated even with Google help. I have a windows 7 a windows 8 and an Xp machine if it helps
gav83collins said:
I have linux kali set up. On a vm on one of my machines. But I've only just started to learn linux. And my god there is a lot to learn. Once I get my wireless adaptor running in kali. Which I've had a little trouble with. And not a lot of time . I can maybe help. Even if it means installing Ubuntu onto another of my laptops . I just feel a little useless not knowing all the jargon for Linux as yet. Cmd is complicated even with Google help. I have a windows 7 a windows 8 and an Xp machine if it helps
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Practically the only thing you have to know is how the commands within the terminal works. Also, I can recommend you to already start downloading the source from the Samsung Opensource site (Search for SM-R380) as the download is very slow (1.3 Gb at 40 Kb/s). With the source, a guide is provided which exactly tells you how to compile it. Read this guide very carefully when trying to set up your environment!
Furtheron, once we're able to compile it all we can try to modify the source. I really don't know your coding skills but please notice this isn't a project to learn how to code. But for now, lets try to compile it all.
I'm out camping in the sticks at the moment. But once um home il look into it
ok dude im home, and im downloading, the sm-r380 --- sm r381 source code, i have the standalone sbd, but im gonna need the sdk too i imagine, so il grab that too, now to wait
edit.....
oh i see windows 8 isnt supported, this is my main machine, my win 7, is my wired media centre into my tv/av reciever......
gonna try running in compatibility for win 7 on my win 8 machine, fingers crossed, if not, il create a second linux vm, next to kali, ubuntu of course
gav83collins said:
ok dude im home, and im downloading, the sm-r380 --- sm r381 source code, i have the standalone sbd, but im gonna need the sdk too i imagine, so il grab that too, now to wait
edit.....
oh i see windows 8 isnt supported, this is my main machine, my win 7, is my wired media centre into my tv/av reciever......
gonna try running in compatibility for win 7 on my win 8 machine, fingers crossed, if not, il create a second linux vm, next to kali, ubuntu of course
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'd STRONGLY recommend you to run Ubuntu (12.04) for your build environment to prevent unnecessary hassle.
I'm downloading and installing an Ubuntu 12.04 AMD64 build. I guess, and hope, that the errors I got during my first time trying were because I used a x86 build of Ubuntu.
Corstian said:
I'd STRONGLY recommend you to run Ubuntu (12.04) for your build environment to prevent unnecessary hassle.
I'm downloading and installing an Ubuntu 12.04 AMD64 build. I guess, and hope, that the errors I got during my first time trying were because I used a x86 build of Ubuntu.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
, ive had no errors installing the sdk i just toubleshooted compatibility first, and updating the repos, was pretty straight forward, i too am on an amd 64 bit windows,,,,,,,
what issues have you had, did you try the windows sdk b4 u installed linux
im still waiting on my source to download, after 6 hours waiting we had a power shortage here in western australia, typically my luck, ive restarted
gav83collins said:
, ive had no errors installing the sdk i just toubleshooted compatibility first, and updating the repos, was pretty straight forward, i too am on an amd 64 bit windows,,,,,,,
what issues have you had, did you try the windows sdk b4 u installed linux
im still waiting on my source to download, after 6 hours waiting we had a power shortage here in western australia, typically my luck, ive restarted
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The problem isn't in installing the Tizen SDK. The problem is in compiling the Tizen source code and the dependencies needed to do this. I have attached the contents of the "HOW_TO_BUILD" file so you can see the steps needed to compile the Tizen source you are currently trying to download.
HOW_TO_BUILD
System requirement (Strongly recommended)
* OS: Ubuntu 12.04 or newer
Installing Development Tools in Ubuntu
* Open the source list by using text editor.
$ sudo vi /etc/apt/sources.list
* Add Tizen tools repository to the source list.
deb http://download.tizen.org/tools/latest-release/Ubuntu_12.04 /
* Resynchronize the package index files from the sources specified in the source list by executing the following command:
$ sudo apt-get update
* Install a development tool by executing the following command:
$ sudo apt-get install gbs
Build root strap setup
* Download build rootstrap and unpack into home directory
$ sudo tar xfz {build rootstrap name} --same-owner
* Change root to the build rootstrap
$ sudo chroot standard-armv7l
* Change account to abuild
$ su abuild
Building a package
* Source packages are in the /home/abuild/rpmbuild/SRPMS
* Build a package with rpmbuild
$ cd /home/abuild/rpmbuild/SRPMS
$ rpmbuild --rebuild {src.rpm name}
* You can find binary rpms in /home/abuild/rpmbuild/RPMS
Install a package
* rpm -ivh {src.rpm name}
* if {src.rpm name} is already installed : rpm -ivh --force {src.rpm name}
Corstian said:
The problem isn't in installing the Tizen SDK. The problem is in compiling the Tizen source code and the dependencies needed to do this. I have attached the "HOW_TO_BUILD" file so you can see the steps needed to compile the Tizen source you are currently trying to download.
HOW_TO_BUILD
System requirement (Strongly recommended)
* OS: Ubuntu 12.04 or newer
Installing Development Tools in Ubuntu
* Open the source list by using text editor.
$ sudo vi /etc/apt/sources.list
* Add Tizen tools repository to the source list.
deb http://download.tizen.org/tools/latest-release/Ubuntu_12.04 /
* Resynchronize the package index files from the sources specified in the source list by executing the following command:
$ sudo apt-get update
* Install a development tool by executing the following command:
$ sudo apt-get install gbs
Build root strap setup
* Download build rootstrap and unpack into home directory
$ sudo tar xfz {build rootstrap name} --same-owner
* Change root to the build rootstrap
$ sudo chroot standard-armv7l
* Change account to abuild
$ su abuild
Building a package
* Source packages are in the /home/abuild/rpmbuild/SRPMS
* Build a package with rpmbuild
$ cd /home/abuild/rpmbuild/SRPMS
$ rpmbuild --rebuild {src.rpm name}
* You can find binary rpms in /home/abuild/rpmbuild/RPMS
Install a package
* rpm -ivh {src.rpm name}
* if {src.rpm name} is already installed : rpm -ivh --force {src.rpm name}
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thanks, but thats ubuntu, unless absolutley neccessary, i want to use windows 8, i dont think my machine will handle ubuntu with my linux kali on a vm, and all my cloud, n media editing software aswell, il just configure the enviroment variables to make it work..........hows your compiling going
gav83collins said:
thanks, but thats ubuntu, unless absolutley neccessary, i want to use windows 8, i dont think my machine will handle ubuntu with my linux kali on a vm, and all my cloud, n media editing software aswell, il just configure the enviroment variables to make it work..........hows your compiling going
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well crap! So I've installed Ubuntu 12.04 AMD64 as VM (Which runs pretty amazing btw) and I still have the same errors. Le me trying to dig deeper into the operating system to find the problem of this all. (I'm also not really into UNIX OS's) Turns out I / we all need a 32 bit operating system to be able to use the binary files.
Running the file xargs command on the xargs file gave this result:
Code:
xargs: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, ARM, version 1 (SYSV), dynamically linked (uses shared libs), for GNU/Linux 2.6.25, stripped
Whatsoever, I gotta start downloading a 32 bit Ubuntu 12.04 iso.
Corstian said:
Well crap! So I've installed Ubuntu 12.04 AMD64 as VM (Which runs pretty amazing btw) and I still have the same errors. Le me trying to dig deeper into the operating system to find the problem of this all. (I'm also not really into UNIX OS's) Turns out I / we all need a 32 bit operating system to be able to use the binary files.
Running the file xargs command on the xargs file gave this result:
Code:
xargs: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, ARM, version 1 (SYSV), dynamically linked (uses shared libs), for GNU/Linux 2.6.25, stripped
Whatsoever, I gotta start downloading a 32 bit Ubuntu 12.04 iso.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
again thats ubuntu, with windows 64 win 8, you can runx86 0n 64 bit, dynamically, and also sys compat to any previous version, if you get errors, change the correct enviroment variable path
you do your way, il try mine, between us, we should get somewhere
i gotta be honest reading up on this app making, standalone, or otherwise, is blowing my mind, im not the brightest spark
gav83collins said:
again thats ubuntu, with windows 64 win 8, you can runx86 0n 64 bit, dynamically, and also sys compat to any previous version, if you get errors, change the correct enviroment variable path
you do your way, il try mine, between us, we should get somewhere
i gotta be honest reading up on this app making, standalone, or otherwise, is blowing my mind, im not the brightest spark
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So I tried multiple editions of Ubuntu and still no luck in compiling the source. How's it going on Windows?
Corstian said:
So I tried multiple editions of Ubuntu and still no luck in compiling the source. How's it going on Windows?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My source download keeps failing. Can you mirror it to a fat er site
Like Google drive . Your own and share the folder to me. Australian Internet is ****. I'm currently dev testing the gear 2 Cam app on the s3 s5 and s5 over multiple android versions and builds 4.1.2, 4.2.2, 4.3, 4.4.x - aosp, Aokp, miui, cyanogen. Slim. Pa etc
When running the command "su abuild", I got the error message "bash: /bin/su: cannot execute binary file".
I use a vm of ubuntu 12.04 64bit.
Hi all,
I don't think we have a Rasp-pi forum on here, so Im posting here. Also, such a forum would probably be for those wishing to run Android on their Raspberry Pi. This thread is for those who are using their Pi for android development
I had a hard time finding android-tools packages for the debian "wheezy" build that comes with the Pi, so I back-ported them and built some binaries, attached below.
This is useful for people who plan to use their Raspberry Pi for some sort of android tinker. ing, but don't plan on doing any actual development (and hence will not need the full SDK). These should save some time. My first contribution to XDA, so enjoy!
Mirror available via PM.
MD5 Hash: AB22B0251A8A1B1209EF1342167C1E09
SHA1: FA8113237AF1C8F64FA74BF800A866A7B681CD2A
INSTALLATION
Download, cd to the directory you downloaded,
Code:
tar zxvf android-tools-pi.tar.gz && cd android-tools-pi
There should be three binaries in the directory.
Install with
Code:
dpkg -i android-tools-*.deb
Best,
amk
EDIT: Whoops.. if a mod could move this to the Pi forums I'd appreciate it. Thanks in advance.
I downloaded the files and unfortunately the md5 doesn't agree.
C9D4DB0E4D350022888D1AF8921EF7E9 for android-tools-pi.tar.gz
4C27CA4B23E4C3E0AFF814B592871DF6 for android-tools-pi.tar
The first file, android-tools-adb, doesn't seem to be a valid debian archive format.
I tried downloading more than once. Could you check your upload went ok?
A link or list of the utilities would be helpful, save a search. Also how you did it. I see fastboot and fsutils.
Thanks
Hm, that's interesting. This is from so long ago it almost feels like a foreign language now haha.
I think I just compiled the source code to run on wheezy but doing so required a few tricks (I think it needed to use the newer c++ compiler not included in wheezy)
Also the reason I did this was so I could cross-compile android ROMs on my pi, which I soon discovered was the stupidest idea I've ever had in my life. It's great for doing adb/recovery/ssh stuff though
I can look into it, but it'll take me some time
I know the feeling, forgetting earlier work, I actually write notes now, but then one has to clip them together to be able to find them again.
The latest Debian image seems to be quite good, usually though one has to download the more specialist utilities. It's just that these packages don't exist online, but I expect the c++ compiler would be available. If it isn't easy to reproduce the steps I'll start looking for the source and compiler. It seems that no one else tested the packages, but the general process of compiling a package for the Raspberry, and getting it into the right format to load, might be of interest to others.
The CWM (Clock Work Mode) recovery utility 6.0.5.1 for the P3100 phone seems easy enough to install using odin.
I imagine you were compiling Replicant, probably not enough memory on a Raspberry so it might need a big cache file somewhere if that's even possible.
The ssh function to phone seems interesting. I use it quite a lot between Raspberry computers, especially if something freezes.
Thanks
FOR OLD VERSION:
Since your archive files are not working - i got "****** doesn't seem to be a valid debian archive format"
Go to http://ftp.acc.umu.se/mirror/cdimage/snapshot/Debian/pool/main/a/android-tools/
Download this files to PI:
android-tools-adb_4.2.2+git20130529-3_armhf.deb
android-tools-fastboot_4.2.2+git20130529-3_armhf.deb
android-tools-fsutils_4.2.2+git20130529-3_armhf.deb
In terminal go to file location and then :
Code:
dpkg -i android-tools-*.deb
Or easy
NOW:
Code:
sudo apt-get install android-tools-adb android-tools-fastboot
Done ... we got ADB on Raspberry PI
Errors
Thank for the information so far.
I downloaded the files and ran the commands. There seem to be dependency problems.
I ran the second command thinking it might solve the problem with adb from the first one. It didn't.
As I don't want to risk doing the wrong thing I am posting the command prompt output here.
Should I do as it suggests? "Try 'apt-get -f install' with no packages"
I don't know enough about the packages to say what the problem is without a lot more research.
[email protected] ~/Desktop/Android/NewTools $ sudo dpkg -i android-tools-*.deb
Selecting previously unselected package android-tools-adb.
(Reading database ... 89053 files and directories currently installed.)
Unpacking android-tools-adb (from android-tools-adb_4.2.2+git20130529-3_armhf.deb) ...
Preparing to replace android-tools-fastboot 4.2.2+git20130529-3 (using android-tools-fastboot_4.2.2+git20130529-3_armhf.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement android-tools-fastboot ...
Preparing to replace android-tools-fsutils 4.2.2+git20130529-3 (using android-tools-fsutils_4.2.2+git20130529-3_armhf.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement android-tools-fsutils ...
dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of android-tools-adb:
android-tools-adb depends on libc6 (>= 2.15); however:
Version of libc6:armhf on system is 2.13-38+rpi2+deb7u8.
dpkg: error processing android-tools-adb (--install):
dependency problems - leaving unconfigured
Setting up android-tools-fastboot (4.2.2+git20130529-3) ...
Setting up android-tools-fsutils (4.2.2+git20130529-3) ...
Processing triggers for man-db ...
Errors were encountered while processing:
android-tools-adb
[email protected] ~/Desktop/Android/NewTools $ sudo apt-get install android-tools-adb android-tools-fastboot
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
android-tools-adb is already the newest version.
android-tools-fastboot is already the newest version.
You might want to run 'apt-get -f install' to correct these:
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
android-tools-adb : Depends: libc6 (>= 2.15) but 2.13-38+rpi2+deb7u8 is to be installed
E: Unmet dependencies. Try 'apt-get -f install' with no packages (or specify a solution).
[email protected] ~/Desktop/Android/NewTools $
I'm trying to compile CM13 for the OPO, and I keep coming with an error, I've tried to compile 3 times, and each time getting the same error. I wiped ccache and tried make clean and still have had the same results, any ideas?
http://pastebin.com/CvJT8RKZ
These could be the culprit :
Code:
expr: syntax error
stat: illegal option -- c
usage: stat [-FlLnqrsx] [-f format] [-t timefmt] [file ...]
[...]
/Volumes/CM/android/system/kernel/oneplus/msm8974/scripts/xz_wrap.sh: line 23: exec: xz: not found
The second error could be fixed by properly setting up xz binary (either by installing it or exporting it to the current terminal window). Can you also mention what operating system you're using to compile the ROM ?
F4uzan said:
These could be the culprit :
Code:
expr: syntax error
stat: illegal option -- c
usage: stat [-FlLnqrsx] [-f format] [-t timefmt] [file ...]
[...]
/Volumes/CM/android/system/kernel/oneplus/msm8974/scripts/xz_wrap.sh: line 23: exec: xz: not found
The second error could be fixed by properly setting up xz binary (either by installing it or exporting it to the current terminal window). Can you also mention what operating system you're using to compile the ROM ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm using OS X 10.11.4, and this is my first-ish time creating a ROM (well from source anyway) so I have no idea what that means, any chance you could walk me through it (I'm reasonably competent, just need some general direction).
Vekhez said:
I'm using OS X 10.11.4, and this is my first-ish time creating a ROM (well from source anyway) so I have no idea what that means, any chance you could walk me through it (I'm reasonably competent, just need some general direction).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Are you trying to build on OS X, or are you running a Linux VM? Either way, I think you might be missing some packages like the above poster mentioned. Here's a guide I found for setting up your OS X environment: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2510898, make sure you grab the required packages for compiling android. Good luck!
ryanmat said:
Are you trying to build on OS X, or are you running a Linux VM? Either way, I think you might be missing some packages like the above poster mentioned. Here's a guide I found for setting up your OS X environment: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2510898, make sure you grab the required packages for compiling android. Good luck!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Following all those instructions everything has already been done, all the brew things have been installed, everything is up to date etc. So I'm assuming the error will be the same?
Vekhez said:
Following all those instructions everything has already been done, all the brew things have been installed, everything is up to date etc. So I'm assuming the error will be the same?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You can always sync the repo again and retry the build. If it doesn't work you can always ask in the thread I linked. The other place to check out is here: https://source.android.com/source/initializing.html
Here's a link to the xz package for Mac you seem to be missing: http://macpkg.sourceforge.net/
Hello all,
I am the noobest person when it comes to Android development, yet here I am trying to build my own Android for the Pwn Phone.
I followed the XDA guide here: http://forum.xda-developers.com/goo...opment/guide-convert-phone-pwn-phone-t2852293
As well as the official steps at Pwnie Express: https://www.pwnieexpress.com/build-pwn-phone
And after hours of reading and setting everything up according to all of the steps in those guides, I'm running into a Java error during the build portion. The two important specs are:
Linux Elementary (Ubuntu 16, Loki)
OpenJDK 6/7/8
Oracle Java 7/8
The error I'm getting is:
You asked for an OpenJDK 7 build but you version is
java version "1.7.0_80" Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.7.0_80-b15) Java Hotspot(TM) 64-bit Server VM (build 24.80-b11, mixed mode).
I've downloaded and isntalled OpenJDK 6, 7 and 8 as well as Oracle Java 7 and 8 and I changed the defaults by running:
sudo update-alternatives --config java
sudo update-alternatives --config javac
I've changed to every version of Java listed there, removed them all and installed them all again. Either I get the above error message or I get "You are attempting to build with the incorrect version of Java...etc"
I get the error around 10 minutes after I run the "brunch hammerhead" command.
I'm not sure which version of Java I need as I believe this 1.7.0 IS Java 7. Whenever I switch to 8 it says the version is 1.8 and the same thing with 6 (1.6). I've downloaded and installed every program listed in the two guides to set up the environment properly, but somehow keep running into this problem. Would somebody out there be able to point me in the right direction? Every other command has run without a problem so I know Java is the only thing keeping me from building this ROM. This is the first ROM I've tried to compile, though I've rooted and installed many custom ROMs for previous phones. This is the first time I've been this involved in getting a ROM and any help would be appreciated.
bobisguilty said:
Hello all,
I am the noobest person when it comes to Android development, yet here I am trying to build my own Android for the Pwn Phone.
I followed the XDA guide here: http://forum.xda-developers.com/goo...opment/guide-convert-phone-pwn-phone-t2852293
As well as the official steps at Pwnie Express: https://www.pwnieexpress.com/build-pwn-phone
And after hours of reading and setting everything up according to all of the steps in those guides, I'm running into a Java error during the build portion. The two important specs are:
Linux Elementary (Ubuntu 16, Loki)
OpenJDK 6/7/8
Oracle Java 7/8
The error I'm getting is:
You asked for an OpenJDK 7 build but you version is
java version "1.7.0_80" Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.7.0_80-b15) Java Hotspot(TM) 64-bit Server VM (build 24.80-b11, mixed mode).
I've downloaded and isntalled OpenJDK 6, 7 and 8 as well as Oracle Java 7 and 8 and I changed the defaults by running:
sudo update-alternatives --config java
sudo update-alternatives --config javac
I've changed to every version of Java listed there, removed them all and installed them all again. Either I get the above error message or I get "You are attempting to build with the incorrect version of Java...etc"
I get the error around 10 minutes after I run the "brunch hammerhead" command.
I'm not sure which version of Java I need as I believe this 1.7.0 IS Java 7. Whenever I switch to 8 it says the version is 1.8 and the same thing with 6 (1.6). I've downloaded and installed every program listed in the two guides to set up the environment properly, but somehow keep running into this problem. Would somebody out there be able to point me in the right direction? Every other command has run without a problem so I know Java is the only thing keeping me from building this ROM. This is the first ROM I've tried to compile, though I've rooted and installed many custom ROMs for previous phones. This is the first time I've been this involved in getting a ROM and any help would be appreciated.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
hi.
any luck building the rom