Can you experienced doods, help out a noob? I have recently rooted my phone (after MUCH research and reading) and just installed Set CPU app. I have been reading about the different settings for Set CPU, and it appears to be device specific, so I wanted to know if any can suggest some stable and useful settings and profiles I can use.
My goal would be to extend battery life and increase erformance while the phone is being used. I kinda guess this is most peoples reason for using this app. Slow the CPU down while the screen is off, and increase it a bit when the screen is on. I am not totally sure why you adjust it while it is charging. And wold this fi into the screen is off profile.
Ok enough rambling, and thanks for any assistance!
Forget SETCPU. Voltage Control is the way to go. For battery life, I would underclock to 100-800mhz and have -100mv all through the range. For performance, 100-1400 mhz (1.5 & 1.6 ghz are heavily overvolted) and have -100mv from 100-1000 mhz and -75 for 1100-1400. Leave the governers and io schedulers where they are.
Sent from my Droid Charge running GummyFroyo 1.9.1
kvswim said:
Forget SETCPU. Voltage Control is the way to go. For battery life, I would underclock to 100-800mhz and have -100mv all through the range. For performance, 100-1400 mhz (1.5 & 1.6 ghz are heavily overvolted) and have -100mv from 100-1000 mhz and -75 for 1100-1400. Leave the governers and io schedulers where they are.
Sent from my Droid Charge running GummyFroyo 1.9.1
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Using the voltage control within SetCPU or a voltage control app?
Thanks
Edit: after installing set CPU my phone seems to be running slower than usual. So, I ran a quadrant benchmark and it is coming up with much lower scores than it did before. Is there any way to set it back to the original cpu speeds with out deleting the app?
Delete setcpu and get voltage control from the market.
Sent from my SCH-I510 using Tapatalk
sneakysolidbake said:
Delete setcpu and get voltage control from the market.
Sent from my SCH-I510 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1 for this
running Imoseyon's OC/UV test kernel:
100-1000mhz uv -75
1200-1400 uv -50
IO: deadline and Governor: conservative
smooth as butter and fast when it needs to be, getting a little over 2200 in quadrant
anoninja118 said:
+1 for this
running Imoseyon's OC/UV test kernel:
100-1000mhz uv -75
1200-1400 uv -50
IO: deadline and Governor: conservative
smooth as butter and fast when it needs to be, getting a little over 2200 in quadrant
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks, can I use this with imnuts OTB kernal?
gdubya34 said:
Thanks, can I use this with imnuts OTB kernal?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
you should be able to yeah.. try a different set of settings every day to find whats the most fast and stable on your phone, what works on mine may not necessarily work on yours or someone elses
blazing through on my VZ Droid Charge 4G
anoninja118 said:
+1 for this
running Imoseyon's OC/UV test kernel:
100-1000mhz uv -75
1200-1400 uv -50
IO: deadline and Governor: conservative
smooth as butter and fast when it needs to be, getting a little over 2200 in quadrant
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Tried those settings and my phone froze a few times so I upped the voltage to get it to work for me. This is my first time overclocking a phone. Do any of these settings look strange using voltage control?
100-400mhz uv-75
800-1000mhz uv-50
1200-1300mhz uv-25
I haven't froze yet, although I noticed my battery drains a little faster then normal (that was expected).
hmmm.... The GummyCharged GBE 1.9RC1 8/13/11 kernel is not incompatible with the Voltage control free app.
Error message "Unsupported kernel detected. The kernel your device is running is incompatible with Voltage control."
praveen1789 said:
hmmm.... The GummyCharged GBE 1.9RC1 8/13/11 kernel is not incompatible with the Voltage control free app.
Error message "Unsupported kernel detected. The kernel your device is running is incompatible with Voltage control."
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
GummyCharge GBE is gingerbread which means stock kernel, no voodoo and therefore no changing of voltage settings
blazing through on my VZ Droid Charge 4G
Gotcha! Thanks to that.
Now I have a crazy question below. (trust me there are even more questions all over my mind now)
When they say "ROM", I'm assuming that its collective of Kernel, all the apps and the radio.... Can't we just downgrade the kernel of "GummyCharge GBE" Rom?
anoninja118 said:
+1 for this
running Imoseyon's OC/UV test kernel:
100-1000mhz uv -75
1200-1400 uv -50
IO: deadline and Governor: conservative
smooth as butter and fast when it needs to be, getting a little over 2200 in quadrant
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
These gave me a reboot watching netflix on wifi. Will try -25 @ 1300 and see what happens. Thanks for the post though. Its a great starting place for me.
running humble 1.51
Khanusma said:
These gave me a reboot watching netflix on wifi. Will try -25 @ 1300 and see what happens. Thanks for the post though. Its a great starting place for me.
running humble 1.51
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah those are kinda high 'performance' settings, not all phones like being overclocked or undervolted much less both lol.. Start with it just overclocked for a day or two and see how it runs, however there's gonna be some serious battery drain obviously. Then move on to undervolting slowly like maybe -25 across the board and leave 1400 alone for another day or two... just experiment like this until you have the right balance of speed, stability and battery life. As a matter of fact I toned mine down a bit afterwards and it worked nice:
Overclocked to 1.2ghz (1200mhz),
took out 600mhz frequency and set 100 to -75, then 200-800 at -50, 1000 and 1200 at -25
or if you want battery life and don't mind sacrificing a little performance you can underclock to 800mhz and set all to maybe -75... its a lot of testing to find what works for your phone, if it reboots freezes or lags too much its either overclocked too much or undervolted too much
edit: I also use the free voltage control app from the market, it lets you set min. and max. clock speeds as well as voltage so thats all I need lol
blazing through on my VZ Droid Charge 4G
praveen1789 said:
Gotcha! Thanks to that.
Now I have a crazy question below. (trust me there are even more questions all over my mind now)
When they say "ROM", I'm assuming that its collective of Kernel, all the apps and the radio.... Can't we just downgrade the kernel of "GummyCharge GBE" Rom?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Roms are not always all inclusive with a kernel and whatnot.. Most are custom apps, themes, and build/framework remakes to operate on top of the stock roms and will use stock radio and kernel to operate unless a custom radio/kernel is flashed. While most radios and apps will work well with different roms, kernels (being basically the 'engine' for the android OS i believe) are dependant on baseband and will not work by switching them around or flashing one over the other. This is the way I understand it to be anyway, I just know kernels are not compatible between 2.2 and 2.3
blazing through on my VZ Droid Charge 4G
anoninja118 said:
Roms are not always all inclusive with a kernel and whatnot.. Most are custom apps, themes, and build/framework remakes to operate on top of the stock roms and will use stock radio and kernel to operate unless a custom radio/kernel is flashed. While most radios and apps will work well with different roms, kernels (being basically the 'engine' for the android OS i believe) are dependant on baseband and will not work by switching them around or flashing one over the other. This is the way I understand it to be anyway, I just know kernels are not compatible between 2.2 and 2.3
blazing through on my VZ Droid Charge 4G
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Makes sense. I'm sure the apps and radio are dependent on the kernel as it is the core. (like an Operating system that provides the platform for applications to work.)
I'm sure the developers thoroughly test these combinations before releasing any ROM, .
However I want to have some fun updating the kernel on the GC GBE 1.9 that I currently have on my charge with couple other kernels out there....
Will see if I create some magic
praveen1789 said:
Makes sense. I'm sure the apps and radio are dependent on the kernel as it is the core. (like an Operating system that provides the platform for applications to work.)
I'm sure the developers thoroughly test these combinations before releasing any ROM, .
However I want to have some fun updating the kernel on the GC GBE 1.9 that I currently have on my charge with couple other kernels out there....
Will see if I create some magic
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
don't use froyo kernels with GB (as of right now there's only one custom GB kernel, navenedrobs nameless ext4 one), it will just lead to a soft bricked phone... i could be wrong but i think imnuts and imoseyon from team gummy are working on some GB kernel awesomeness
blazing through on my VZ Droid Charge 4G
What about the noop, fifo, bfq, vr options? What do these mean?
Sent from my gummycharged SCH-I510 using XDA Premium App
gdubya34 said:
What about the noop, fifo, bfq, vr options? What do these mean?
Sent from my gummycharged SCH-I510 using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Don't touch them. They will either make your phone crawl or have FCs. It hasn't been implemented in the kernel yet.
Sent from my Droid Charge running GummyFroyo 1.9.1
kvswim said:
Don't touch them. They will either make your phone crawl or have FCs. It hasn't been implemented in the kernel yet.
Sent from my Droid Charge running GummyFroyo 1.9.1
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh crap, I am not sure what one it was on when I installed it. I think I changed it by accident. right now it is on the vr setting.
Are there any setting s to avoid when messing with the voltage control, and if I delete the app does go back to the default settings?
gdubya34 said:
Oh crap, I am not sure what one it was on when I installed it. I think I changed it by accident. right now it is on the vr setting.
Are there any setting s to avoid when messing with the voltage control, and if I delete the app does go back to the default settings?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
To avoid: IO schedulers, overvolting (only done in Extreme), and going above 1400 mhz, as 1500 & 1600 are HEAVILY overvolted. Toasted processors=bad magic.
However, you can switch the governers from conservative to performance, but its kind of useless.
If you delete the app it will NOT go back to default...I think. The default io scheduler for imoseyon's kernel is deadline, I forgot what PBJ's is. If you switched it and its still working, don't worry about it.
Sent from my Droid Charge running GummyFroyo 1.9.1
Related
I want to make sure I'm not trippin', I've searched all thru the dev forum, and I don't see a non overclocked kernel. everyone complains about battery life but they are using a kernel that wasn't geared for battery life. oc kernels are for performance and bragging rights. we need a stock kernel with uv and ram optimization along with battery optimization mods
Sent from my Desire HD using XDA App
boimarc89 said:
I want to make sure I'm not trippin', I've searched all thru the dev forum, and I don't see a non overclocked kernel. everyone complains about battery life but they are using a kernel that wasn't geared for battery life. oc kernels are for performance and bragging rights. we need a stock kernel with uv and ram optimization along with battery optimization mods
Sent from my Desire HD using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why not just not overclock? Also, the kernel that comes in Inspired Ace isn't overclockable.
There are many battery saving options! If you have the Leedroid kernel, in setcpu you have the option of running your proccesor at Powersave, performance,smartass and so on...this is also in a few other kernels but I am not sure which ones at the moment.
And if you are really hyped up on saving battery, shutoff haptic feedback, turn of data when you are not using it, lower screen brightness, Use a task killer to kill stray apps(if you were playing angry birds kill it afterwards).
These are a few things you can do that will increase your battery life significantly...
With an overclock capable kernel, you can underclock. I run mine at 921 MHz and don't notice any performance hit. I've tweaked the undervolt to as low as I can get away with. I get pretty awesome battery life that way.
Before you ask, I'm using a kernel I compiled myself from HTC's latest linux source for the Inspire. It's essentially stock with only the addition of the frequency table and hooks for OC/UV.
Gene Poole said:
With an overclock capable kernel, you can underclock. I run mine at 921 MHz and don't notice any performance hit. I've tweaked the undervolt to as low as I can get away with. I get pretty awesome battery life that way.
Before you ask, I'm using a kernel I compiled myself from HTC's latest linux source for the Inspire. It's essentially stock with only the addition of the frequency table and hooks for OC/UV.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This.
Simply underclocking will solve your problems. I prefer to run @1.4 Ghz. I have everything optimized for speed & efficiency and still don't lose in battery performance.
Running CM7 with LordMod UE 2.6 kernel and smartass CPU governor, I can set the max speed to 768mhz with very little performance hit noticed. I might just keep it that way, haven't decided yet. Scrolling is still smooth, Angry Birds is still smooth. The cool thing about running max 768mhz with the pinky undervolt script is the CPU voltage never goes above 900mv.
I'm running CM7 with nightly 91 and on my Vibrant, they made a kernel that was stock uv no oc and u could use it all day, literally....
Sent from my Desire HD using XDA App
This post has been edited because I added Mandrobench results because it utilization of both cores. Mandrobench scores were identical for both kernels. Running Mandrobench at 1500 more than once tended to overheat my phone and cause reboots and other signs of instability.
One thing is clear, if you run either Faux or Trinity kernel you must OC at least to 1100 or you take a huge hit on performance.
I ran 4 different benchmarks on every configuration of CM 10 times with the Faux and Trinity kernels. I normalized the results so that each benchmark was evenly weighted and so the numbers are better understood they were normalized so that CM with its own kernel scores 100. All other numbers are relative to that. The 4 benchmarks were Quadrant, Smartbench 2011, Linpack, and Mandrobench. The results are a bit surprising, I am attaching the spreadsheet so that anyone can check my methodology.
CM w/CM kernel 1000 MHz score 100
CM w/Faux kernel 1000 MHz score 77
CM w/Faux kernel 1100 MHz score 104
CM w/Faux kernel 1200 MHz score 114
CM w/Faux kernel 1300 MHz score 123
CM w/Faux kernel 1500 MHz score 138
CM w/Trinity kernel 1000 MHz score 85
CM w/Trinity kernel 1100 MHz score 116
CM w/Trinity kernel 1200 MHz score 124
CM w/Trinity kernel 1400 MHz score 140
CM w/Trinity kernel 1500 MHz score 147
Test for each configuration were started following a reboot with a battery charged over 60%. They were run sequentially the same way for each configuration. Each number above was the result of the averaging a total of 30 benchmarks.
Interesting note, the first couple Quadrant scores on each run were generally lower than the rest, result of caching by the phone perhaps? On certain configurations the Smartbench results fluctuated wildly producing unexpectedly low scores. Not sure what the reason for this fluctuation but it is repeatable, at least on my phone, but only on certain configurations.
This took a long time, I am sharing it because I found the results unexpected and that they might be useful to somebody. Not everyone is dumb enough to sit and run benchmarks all day. Would be interesting to know how close the numbers are ran on another phone. I am intentionally only providing the numbers and my methodology, I will leave it to someone smarter to explain them.
Add Mandrobench to the list... only app that utilizes TWO cores for its benchmarking (free too). Then we'll talk.
EtherealRemnant said:
Add Mandrobench to the list... only app that utilizes TWO cores for its benchmarking (free too). Then we'll talk.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree, Mandrobench should have been included, I didn't originally because it has disappeared from the market. I have searched my back-ups and found the apk, so I will incorporated them into the experiment later today. It is my understanding that most current apps do not take advantage of the dual core, therefore the results from benchmarks that are not optimized for dual-core have significance.
EtherealRemnant said:
Add Mandrobench to the list... only app that utilizes TWO cores for its benchmarking (free too). Then we'll talk.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Above not available anymore on market - maybe post the .apk.
Let me start by saying thanks! This undoubtedly took a very long time and it was nice of you to share the results with everyone. Did you use only ext3 or ext4 kernels or a combination of both?
Sent from my LG-P999 using Tapatalk
I appreciate u sharing your results. Just a quick question. was ur battery life changed a lot while u overclocked it. Also what's the difference between ext4 and 3
Sent from my LG-P999 using XDA Premium App
EtherealRemnant said:
Add Mandrobench to the list... only app that utilizes TWO cores for its benchmarking (free too). Then we'll talk.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Mandrobench was added to my original post. These results were identical for both kernels.
r4d14n7 said:
Let me start by saying thanks! This undoubtedly took a very long time and it was nice of you to share the results with everyone. Did you use only ext3 or ext4 kernels or a combination of both?
Sent from my LG-P999 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Both kernels were ext4, made much easier to switch back and forth by the new version of clockwork.
Both of these are file systems and ext4 is newer and theoretically faster, probably more so on a computer where there are more read/writes to disc. I don't think any of these benchmarks test for this. Someone else may correct this as I don't know a lot about phones, I am a computer guy, and an out of date one at that.
moeahmad1995 said:
I appreciate u sharing your results. Just a quick question. was ur battery life changed a lot while u overclocked it. Also what's the difference between ext4 and 3
Sent from my LG-P999 using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Running consecutive benchmarks can kill a battery in 2 hours.
Battery life is a subjective, I haven't thought of a way to objectively test it. I feel I get the best battery life with CM with its own kernel or Eaglesblood Froyo. Bionix appears to eat batteries.
After seeing these results, I plan to run the Trinity UV11 kernel for awhile and see to see how good the battery life is. The performance increase appears significant for only OC to 1100 and I like the idea of getting the advantages of a little OC/UV without having to run Pimp my CPU.
I have gotten a clear increase (hours more idle time) by simply turning off 4G and only toggling it on when I need it. I use Pandora a lot and it ironically runs better at 2G when I am bicycling (less drops interruptions in the streaming as I move around).
Cubeology said:
Running consecutive benchmarks can kill a battery in 2 hours.
Battery life is a subjective, I haven't thought of a way to objectively test it. I feel I get the best battery life with CM with its own kernel or Eaglesblood Froyo. Bionix appears to eat batteries.
After seeing these results, I plan to run the Trinity UV11 kernel for awhile and see to see how good the battery life is. The performance increase appears significant for only OC to 1100 and I like the idea of getting the advantages of a little OC/UV without having to run Pimp my CPU.
I have gotten a clear increase (hours more idle time) by simply turning off 4G and only toggling it on when I need it. I use Pandora a lot and it ironically runs better at 2G when I am bicycling (less drops interruptions in the streaming as I move around).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Really? I found that these 2 kernels gave me better battery life then the stock cm7 kernel. Also can you add antutu benchmark to the list?
maxesxp said:
Really? I found that these 2 kernels gave me better battery life then the stock cm7 kernel. Also can you add antutu benchmark to the list?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
you are also quoting and talking about a response from 6 months ago which was beginning stages for cm7 on this phone especially kernels lol... Glad you are getting great performance and battery though.
mt3g said:
you are also quoting and talking about a response from 6 months ago which was beginning stages for cm7 on this phone especially kernels lol... Glad you are getting great performance and battery though.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
LOL oops I need to start learning to read dates.. -.-
Sent from my LG-P999 using Tapatalk
some one should run tests again
I tested Trinity vs Faux in AnTuTu and got pretty much same results on charger,but off charger Trinity got about 50 more (6000 off charger and 6125 while charging)
I use UV kernels clocked at 1100.
Switched to Faux because Trinity has bugs like reboot hangs the phone and sometimes waking up take a while. Also boot image and animations are not that nice and boot sound with kernel doesn't even seem to be working.....
Trinity 6004-6120
Faux 5918-6124
CM Stock around 5500
kolyan said:
some one should run tests again
I tested Trinity vs Faux in AnTuTu and got pretty much same results on charger,but off charger Trinity got about 50 more (6000 off charger and 6125 while charging)
I use UV kernels clocked at 1100.
Switched to Faux because Trinity has bugs like reboot hangs the phone and sometimes waking up take a while. Also boot image and animations are not that nice and boot sound with kernel doesn't even seem to be working.....
Trinity 6004-6120
Faux 5918-6124
CM Stock around 5500
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why are you getting such low scores? Not OC'd maybe? I'm using Fauxs newest kernel and my Antutu score was 7566. Average scores around 7300-7600
Sent from my LG-P999 using xda premium
mike7169 said:
Why are you getting such low scores? Not OC'd maybe? I'm using Fauxs newest kernel and my Antutu score was 7566. Average scores around 7300-7600
Sent from my LG-P999 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Faux's newest kernel is ~1.5 correct?
He's probably using the Trinity battery saving kernel clocked at 1.1 and undervolted.
I use the Trinity 1.1GHz kernel and undervolt to -200mV (for the lower ones, leave the top three at stock for stability reasons) and I score around 6100 in Antutu.
redmonke255 said:
Faux's newest kernel is ~1.5 correct?
He's probably using the Trinity battery saving kernel clocked at 1.1 and undervolted.
I use the Trinity 1.1GHz kernel and undervolt to -200mV (for the lower ones, leave the top three at stock for stability reasons) and I score around 6100 in Antutu.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That makes sense. I just did a benchmark @1.1ghz and I got 6007. Ya the Faux kernel max is @1.5ghz. Its undervolted too, not much, just enough to get great battery life.
Sent from my LG-P999 using xda premium
I said in post that I use UV kernels clocked at 1100mhz
I now use Trinity Kernel because Faux did not have 216Mhz option in SetCPU. I also UVed by -25 for now and set charging profile to 400+ Mhz to avoid SoD
I wonder whats the difference in battery life if you use 1100Mhz or 1500Mhz ?
kolyan said:
I said in post that I use UV kernels clocked at 1100mhz
I now use Trinity Kernel because Faux did not have 216Mhz option in SetCPU. I also UVed by -25 for now and set charging profile to 400+ Mhz to avoid SoD
I wonder whats the difference in battery life if you use 1100Mhz or 1500Mhz ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's a significant difference. I don't have any data to back it up. But I've accidentally left it on the max after a benchmark and it would be in a free fall. Especially when playing a 3D game like MC3
Sent from my LG-P999 using xda premium
I've tried using both Kernels as well as stock. Granted they both seem to run better then stock, I'm currently on Trinity with Standard Voltage, because the Under voltage versions of both Faux and trinity seemed to freeze on reboots for whatever reason. They both appear to run about the same set at 1100 which is what I've set to.
I'd like to say thank you for performing scientific and useful benchmarks!
I just purchased SETCPU from the market. I know its free here but from what I've read it is well worth 2 bucks (or a lot more).
I'm running bamf 1.0,9 cubed and I verified in setcpu it is set to low of 368 and high of 1 ghz.
I am using stock kernel but thinking of trying adynaline's new kernel.
Anyway should I set a custom profile? Any suggestions on settings? I'm more interested in avoiding screen freeze than speeding up anything.
Profiles are not needed.
They're just usefull if you want to underclock at a certain battery level or temperature to save battery or cool down the device in my opinion.
Sent from my LT15i using XDA Premium App
I just overclocked to 1.28 we'll see how it goes....
recDNA said:
I just overclocked to 1.28 we'll see how it goes....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
should be fine.
i had some profiles of:
screen on - min was as low as it could go, max = 1.4ghz -ondemand
screen off - min was as low as it could go, maz = 5xx mhz - batt saver or conservative
battery at 50%, put max at 1ghz- on demand
battery at 15% max was at 7xx mhz -batt saver/conservative
temp>115 max was 7xx mhz-batt saver
this yeilded pretty good battery life. i am a heavy data user in a 4g area and on a sense ROM i could easily get 12 hours. pushed it over a day with me trying to get the best battery life possible.
Sounds good. I'm also a heavy user.
Profiles aren't needed with a lot of kernels. Some have built in profiles and in others some governors include profiles such as smartass and interactivex.
The only thing I really use it for is if I overclock, which I rarely ever do, and to change the governor.
Sent from my ADR6400L using XDA App
I use SetCPU with imo's latest kernel and I never let it go above the 1.59GHz mark, but that is where I usually put it when charging via AC.
bamf forever already has the ability to set cpu speeds, its in the bamf settings
It says in the op of bamf kernel thread that bamf setting is unable to retain kernel settings so use setcpu.
I am using Tsugi 2.3.4 with the Oyasumi 0.1 UV kernal I want to overclock to 1500 but what settings should I undervolt it to that is stable thanks in advance for the info.
DirtyPISTOLA said:
I am using Tsugi 2.3.4 with the Oyasumi 0.1 UV kernal I want to overclock to 1500 but what settings should I undervolt it to that is stable thanks in advance for the info.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
We can't tell you not all phones are the same, uv a little (10 or 25) run it for a day or two see how it acts, if its steady, uv a little more, when it starts acting up thats your limit go back to previous settings.
NVIDIA NEVER AGAIN!
fcisco13 said:
We can't tell you not all phones are the same, uv a little (10 or 25) run it for a day or two see how it acts, if its steady, uv a little more, when it starts acting up thats your limit go back to previous settings.
NVIDIA NEVER AGAIN!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Alright thanks will try
Sent from my LG-P999 using Tapatalk
I've seen some general advice not to UV for anything over 1ghz speeds as well, but it may not hurt to try if you want and adjust as needed for stability.
I'm running on a -75mv at 1.5Ghz faux kernel 0.4.7..
Perfectly stable, benchmarked AnTuTu, Quadrant, and all those other good stuff.
I have not tried -100mv yet, I doubt it will be stable.
Every phone is different, but I run mine at -20 up to 1 G, and -10 for the rest.
Mine I cant undervolt shoot I have to keep my minimum frequency at 500 to be stable, course I can also run at 1.5 all day (I keep it at 1.2).
Well I guess I can't say I cant UV since I use pimp my cpu and it only gives you options in 25 increments, maybe I would be stable at like -10. But coming from my galaxy s 4g where I could UV over -150 and still be stable, that just doesnt even sound worth doing.
Edit: I just thought about it and maybe the reason I cant UV (more) is because I'm using fauxs pre UV/OC kernel, so I dont even know what stock voltage is. But comparing to my sgs4g at stock voltage I am running considerably lower voltages on the g2x.
The faux thread says it's pre uv at -50 across the board.
Beekersguy said:
The faux thread says it's pre uv at -50 across the board.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I been running it so long and flashed so many friends phones I can't even remember details anymore!
Sent from my LG-P999 using xda premium
Hey guys just tested my infuse and i got 1540 don t know if it s good so here let me know how r yours!:good:
Here's mine. Running beanstalk. No performance settings touched.
Sent from my SGH-I997 using xda app-developers app
BeanStalk, settings adjusted and played with all around
I can get 2200+or- running Gingerbread 2.3.6 deodexed,but it doesn't feel any smoother or faster,only beanchmarks better
After my previous post I finally got around to installing the latest BeanStalk(1.179a-20130401) so here is a benchmark from it.
Using qkster's 2.3.6. with conservative governor, max frequency 1600, I just got 2532.
As I recall I used to get 1100-1300 on Froyo stock.
Then 1800-2000 on GB rooted with bloatware removed
When clocked to 1600, I think it's usually in the range 2300-2500.
I agree the number doens't mean much. It's how it responds when you ask it to do something. The way our phone works is pretty darned good for an "old" phone.
electricpete1 said:
Using qkster's 2.3.6. with conservative governor, max frequency 1600, I just got 2532.
As I recall I used to get 1100-1300 on Froyo stock.
Then 1800-2000 on GB rooted with bloatware removed
When clocked to 1600, I think it's usually in the range 2300-2500.
I agree the number doens't mean much. It's how it responds when you ask it to do something. The way our phone works is pretty darned good for an "old" phone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Which are you using for IO scheduler,your IO is off the charts compared to what I've been getting
elbscorp said:
Which are you using for IO scheduler,your IO is off the charts compared to what I've been getting
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I/O scheduler - NOOP
electricpete1 said:
I/O scheduler - NOOP
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks,that's what i use don't get that kind of score. Must be in other settings.