Database Info

HowTo overclock to 1.3Ghz (Samsung Galaxy S 4G)

1) SetCPU profile to 1000Mhz = temp > 43C
2) Tegrak overclock
a) load module
b) load 1100Mhz
c) Save profile in SetCPU
(REPEAT PROCESS With 1200Mhz, 1300Mhz)
Please use Set CPU and make sure to add profiles.
800 Mhz = temp > 45C (audible alarm)
1000 Mhz = temp > 43C
1100 Mhz = temp > 40C
1200 Mhz = temp > 35C
1300 Mhz = temp > 30C
My FLOPS in the stress test went from 12 to 16
Now I am able to watch Jimmy Fallon Live and probably Jersey Shore
Those Adobe Flash videos were too heavy for my 1000 Mhz processor
with 1200 Mhz, I'm happy to say the video runs nice.
a few FPS drops here and there, but hey, it's 100 watchable now

rafarataneneces said:
I've read that a program called tegrak overclock can allow you to overclock, but from what I know unless you have an overclocked kernel, you can't overclock
I would like to know if there is a future with this phone.
Currently there are only 2 ROMs working (one of them, the author closed the thread)
I've spent at least one month fixing all the issues of this phone, and by the looks of it it's not quite popular here in USA
I will appreciate responses, since I know that overclocking can give a HUGE boost of speed.
I am thinking in returning my phone and hopefully getting the LG 2GX (Optimus 2X)
Has anybody overclocked their Samsung Galaxy S 4G?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
In the defence of the person who built the ROM your talking about, he did not close the thread... a moderator did.
overclocking is currently not an option for this device and only time will tell if it will be.
as for ROMs, Krylon360 of Team Whiskey will be developing more ROMs soon as he is waiting on getting a device to work with.
the LG looks to be a good device... has many features that are better than the sgs4g so i would think its a decent switch. but for me im waiting for july... the HTC and sgsII will be be out by that time and I can choose the cream of the crop.

mavictb said:
In the defence of the person who built the ROM your talking about, he did not close the thread... a moderator did.
overclocking is currently not an option for this device and only time will tell if it will be.
as for ROMs, Krylon360 of Team Whiskey will be developing more ROMs soon as he is waiting on getting a device to work with.
the LG looks to be a good device... has many features that are better than the sgs4g so i would think its a decent switch. but for me im waiting for july... the HTC and sgsII will be be out by that time and I can choose the cream of the crop.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Any idea when it will be released?
And what price it will have?
If the phone costs around $600, I would buy it
Anything over it I'd guess it's overpriced.
the one thing that I DO NOT LIKE about the Galaxy S 4G is the lack of Flash for the camera
I'd say for a $500 device adding a $10 flash somewhere in the phone would be a good idea

worked great..quadrant score went up also..seems alot faster..thanks alot! this shouldnt do no harm to the phone right? im new to this kind of stuff so kinda nervous.

zmaroman said:
worked great..quadrant score went up also..seems alot faster..thanks alot! this shouldnt do no harm to the phone right? im new to this kind of stuff so kinda nervous.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What kind of scores?
Let us know how this works for you.
If your phone starts getting hot pull the battery.
Sent from my SGH-T959V using XDA Premium App

phone went from 966 to 1212 on the quadrant score with a stock rom.

Works great getting scores around 12300 on quadrent using shadowman's v2.2
Sent from my SGH-T959V using XDA Premium App

i just flashed mine to v2.2 and did the quardrant score and it went down .. did i do something wrong? did u delete the bloatware? running anything else?

As long as u watch out for the temperatures you should be fine
Even if I break the unit I still have warranty on this
Plus I'll be returning this phone anyway
I'll test Quadrant right now

SethNkC said:
Works great getting scores around 12300 on quadrent using shadowman's v2.2
Sent from my SGH-T959V using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I get 1224 on Quadrant
I assume u got 1230

Sorry, I get around 1230.. To many 0's
Sent from my SGH-T959V using XDA Premium App

rafarataneneces said:
1) SetCPU profile to 1000Mhz = temp > 43C
2) Tegrak overclock
a) load module
b) load 1100Mhz
c) Save profile in SetCPU
(REPEAT PROCESS With 1200Mhz, 1300Mhz)
Please use Set CPU and make sure to add profiles.
800 Mhz = temp > 45C (audible alarm)
1000 Mhz = temp > 43C
1100 Mhz = temp > 40C
1200 Mhz = temp > 35C
1300 Mhz = temp > 30C
My FLOPS in the stress test went from 12 to 16
Now I am able to watch Jimmy Fallon Live and probably Jersey Shore
Those Adobe Flash videos were too heavy for my 1000 Mhz processor
with 1200 Mhz, I'm happy to say the video runs nice.
a few FPS drops here and there, but hey, it's 100 watchable now
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
When setting Profiles,
Do you have all of them default to "Charging"?
For scaling do you have them default to "Conservative"?
Do you leave all the Min at default 100000?
Do you leave all the priorities set at default 50?

This wont work due to there is no kernel that allows OC yet for the SGS4G. Ill work on building one after i get CWM and Black Ice going for the device.
Sent from my SGH-T959V using XDA App

krylon360 said:
This wont work due to there is no kernel that allows OC yet for the SGS4G. Ill work on building one after i get CWM and Black Ice going for the device
Will black ice be running on ext4?
Sent from my SGH-T959V using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sent from my SGH-T959V using XDA Premium App

krylon360 said:
This wont work due to there is no kernel that allows OC yet for the SGS4G. Ill work on building one after i get CWM and Black Ice going for the device.
Sent from my SGH-T959V using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It seems to work and it's also listed as supported on the list of devices in the market. I've only used Quadrant standard so far and was getting higher benchmarks.
On another note. Can't wait to get my TW fix when you get Black Ice working on our phones.

Can you upload the presets so I can just load it please ans thanks
Sent from my SGH-T959V using XDA Premium App

A few comments.
1) Some SG4G's don't like 1.3 gig. I'm finding that at 1.2 gig at a high and 200 meg at the low, it's the most stable...at least for my particular unit. Your mileage may vary.
2) I'm using the "Temp >" profiles for all the settings.
3) I suspect that the reason for why it's wonky for some and works great for others is due to the fact that there isn't a true overclock kernel for it. We're taking potluck as to whether it works or not.
-Steve

I would take a word of advice from Krylon. The Kernel that is on our phones is not set up for this to work correctly. The app may support our phone but, our kernel doesn't yet.
I wouldn't recommend doing this. Wait for a compatible Kernel. It will happen but when your phone gets hotter than it was meant to, things on the mother board get loose and you have a very expensive paper weight.
Secondly, quad scores aren't that accurate. Meaning a single piece of code can tell the quadrant app to read higher than its actually running. The phone may run a little faster but its not what it will be with VooDoo lagfix.
This phone should get a true quad score in the mid 900's stock. With the right kernel, and voodoo lag fix (ext4) this phone should get around 1750-1850. That is without overclocking at all. it will have better battery and you won't overheat your phone .

Bl4ckpheniX said:
(snip)
Secondly, quad scores aren't that accurate. Meaning a single piece of code can tell the quadrant app to read higher than its actually running. The phone may run a little faster but its not what it will be with VooDoo lagfix.
This phone should get a true quad score in the mid 900's stock. With the right kernel, and voodoo lag fix (ext4) this phone should get around 1750-1850. That is without overclocking at all. it will have better battery and you won't overheat your phone .
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I thought that Voodoo lagfix wasn't applicable in the SG4G because of the fact that the SG4G doesn't use an abnormal file structure. Or am I wrong?

sgyee said:
I thought that Voodoo lagfix wasn't applicable in the SG4G because of the fact that the SG4G doesn't use an abnormal file structure. Or am I wrong?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think the only real speed difference is with the browser. My vibrant / and sgs 4g get similar quad scores when the vibrant has voodoo disabled.
Sent from my SGH-T959V using XDA Premium App

G2x undervolting thread

hello, I just wanted to make this thread for everyone to share their lowest AND stable voltage values for each frequency. Here goes mine:
(anything above 1000mhz was not tested)
1000mhz <-- 950mV
800mhz <-- 825mV
500mhz <-- 550mV
300mhz <-- 500mV
The following was done with eb1.0.4 + trinity kernel.
please share yours.

Copied from the kernel thread...
Bionix 2 at 1.2Ghz using deadline scheduler.
I attached my PMCpu settings in case anyone needs a reference.
Stressed tested for 15 mins stable.
Quadrant at 3337, Linpack around 45.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse

I started by doing -50 on all from 1200 oc...ill test for a whole day and drop it down -25 tomorrow and test for a whole day. And please post scheduler also.
So far @-50 on deadline scheduler all is working well, no freezes.
G2X

And how is battery life for everyone?

I can't belive how efin good mine has been, bt on, wifi on for 2 hrs, on xda forums every 30 minutes unplugged at 4:30a at 1:00p still had 55% left, whereas stock kernel would be at 15-10%...
G2X

GideonX said:
Copied from the kernel thread...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Using your settings running very smoothh!
Sent from my LG-P999 using XDA Premium App

fcisco13 said:
I started by doing -50 on all from 1200 oc...ill test for a whole day and drop it down -25 tomorrow and test for a whole day. And please post scheduler also.
So far @-50 on deadline scheduler all is working well, no freezes.
G2X
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have no idea what schedulers are
Also, a question to everyone, what are some of your unstable symptoms from UV? Since I've never had any rebooting issues with my g2x, I am not sure if some of the symptoms I was experiencing is from UV'ing or from the kernel. If you gone under the UV limit, does your phone just freeze or would it autoreboot?

c19932 said:
I have no idea what schedulers are
Also, a question to everyone, what are some of your unstable symptoms from UV? Since I've never had any rebooting issues with my g2x, I am not sure if some of the symptoms I was experiencing is from UV'ing or from the kernel. If you gone under the UV limit, does your phone just freeze or would it autoreboot?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
UV will more than likely freeze or you will reboot... UV typically just makes everything really unstable, you might get stuck in a bootloop and have to reflash

JHaste said:
UV will more than likely freeze or you will reboot... UV typically just makes everything really unstable, you might get stuck in a bootloop and have to reflash
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
oh and a precaution to those using eb1.0.4 + trinity kernel. I set my max voltage for 1000mhz (my max. frequency as well) too low, and the phone autoreboot on startup twice and then did a factory reset itself This happened twice so be aware

GideonX said:
Copied from the kernel thread...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm running this settings and so far really good.
Thanks man!
Sent from my Bionix 2 - A TeamWhiskey Production using XDA App

fcisco13 said:
I can't belive how efin good mine has been, bt on, wifi on for 2 hrs, on xda forums every 30 minutes unplugged at 4:30a at 1:00p still had 55% left, whereas stock kernel would be at 15-10%...
G2X
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What ROM and Kernel are you using? Also, which EB can be used with the Trinity kernel? GB or FroYo?

Anyone find that their battery has actually gone down while UV'ing? I'm finding after a full charge, the first 30% has been quicker by almost an hour. Not a really scientific method of testing, but I do just about the same thing every morning (email, txt, etc.) left over from the night before. That first 30% has a lot of screen off time, which will lower the speed to 300Mhz using PMCpu.
I'm going to up the voltage to at least 700 for 300Mhz and see how that fairs.

hah2110 said:
What ROM and Kernel are you using? Also, which EB can be used with the Trinity kernel? GB or FroYo?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
--EB 1.0.4 FROYO (gutted removed live wallpapers, wifi calling, tmo stuff)
--Trinity 15 EB1.04 FROYO
[email protected] pimp my cpu (free on xda)
--Went down -50volts on all speeds
Battery is unbelievable..
G2X

I just restored my EB 1.02. I'm going to flash trinity kernel and report back after one day of use.
Sent from my LG-P999 using XDA App

I've heard several people had lockups and phone factory reset when uv too low, i think going more than -50 is really risking it...
G2X

fcisco13 said:
--EB 1.0.4 FROYO (gutted removed live wallpapers, wifi calling, tmo stuff)
--Trinity 15 EB1.04 FROYO
[email protected] pimp my cpu (free on xda)
--Went down -50volts on all speeds
Battery is unbelievable..
G2X
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can Trinity be used with EB Gingerbread?

hah2110 said:
Can Trinity be used with EB Gingerbread?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There are specific kernel for gb, look for one that is for EB1.04GB
G2X

Benchmarking results faux & trinity kernels on CM

This post has been edited because I added Mandrobench results because it utilization of both cores. Mandrobench scores were identical for both kernels. Running Mandrobench at 1500 more than once tended to overheat my phone and cause reboots and other signs of instability.
One thing is clear, if you run either Faux or Trinity kernel you must OC at least to 1100 or you take a huge hit on performance.
I ran 4 different benchmarks on every configuration of CM 10 times with the Faux and Trinity kernels. I normalized the results so that each benchmark was evenly weighted and so the numbers are better understood they were normalized so that CM with its own kernel scores 100. All other numbers are relative to that. The 4 benchmarks were Quadrant, Smartbench 2011, Linpack, and Mandrobench. The results are a bit surprising, I am attaching the spreadsheet so that anyone can check my methodology.
CM w/CM kernel 1000 MHz score 100
CM w/Faux kernel 1000 MHz score 77
CM w/Faux kernel 1100 MHz score 104
CM w/Faux kernel 1200 MHz score 114
CM w/Faux kernel 1300 MHz score 123
CM w/Faux kernel 1500 MHz score 138
CM w/Trinity kernel 1000 MHz score 85
CM w/Trinity kernel 1100 MHz score 116
CM w/Trinity kernel 1200 MHz score 124
CM w/Trinity kernel 1400 MHz score 140
CM w/Trinity kernel 1500 MHz score 147
Test for each configuration were started following a reboot with a battery charged over 60%. They were run sequentially the same way for each configuration. Each number above was the result of the averaging a total of 30 benchmarks.
Interesting note, the first couple Quadrant scores on each run were generally lower than the rest, result of caching by the phone perhaps? On certain configurations the Smartbench results fluctuated wildly producing unexpectedly low scores. Not sure what the reason for this fluctuation but it is repeatable, at least on my phone, but only on certain configurations.
This took a long time, I am sharing it because I found the results unexpected and that they might be useful to somebody. Not everyone is dumb enough to sit and run benchmarks all day. Would be interesting to know how close the numbers are ran on another phone. I am intentionally only providing the numbers and my methodology, I will leave it to someone smarter to explain them.

Add Mandrobench to the list... only app that utilizes TWO cores for its benchmarking (free too). Then we'll talk.

EtherealRemnant said:
Add Mandrobench to the list... only app that utilizes TWO cores for its benchmarking (free too). Then we'll talk.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree, Mandrobench should have been included, I didn't originally because it has disappeared from the market. I have searched my back-ups and found the apk, so I will incorporated them into the experiment later today. It is my understanding that most current apps do not take advantage of the dual core, therefore the results from benchmarks that are not optimized for dual-core have significance.

EtherealRemnant said:
Add Mandrobench to the list... only app that utilizes TWO cores for its benchmarking (free too). Then we'll talk.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Above not available anymore on market - maybe post the .apk.

Let me start by saying thanks! This undoubtedly took a very long time and it was nice of you to share the results with everyone. Did you use only ext3 or ext4 kernels or a combination of both?
Sent from my LG-P999 using Tapatalk

I appreciate u sharing your results. Just a quick question. was ur battery life changed a lot while u overclocked it. Also what's the difference between ext4 and 3
Sent from my LG-P999 using XDA Premium App

EtherealRemnant said:
Add Mandrobench to the list... only app that utilizes TWO cores for its benchmarking (free too). Then we'll talk.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Mandrobench was added to my original post. These results were identical for both kernels.

r4d14n7 said:
Let me start by saying thanks! This undoubtedly took a very long time and it was nice of you to share the results with everyone. Did you use only ext3 or ext4 kernels or a combination of both?
Sent from my LG-P999 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Both kernels were ext4, made much easier to switch back and forth by the new version of clockwork.
Both of these are file systems and ext4 is newer and theoretically faster, probably more so on a computer where there are more read/writes to disc. I don't think any of these benchmarks test for this. Someone else may correct this as I don't know a lot about phones, I am a computer guy, and an out of date one at that.

moeahmad1995 said:
I appreciate u sharing your results. Just a quick question. was ur battery life changed a lot while u overclocked it. Also what's the difference between ext4 and 3
Sent from my LG-P999 using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Running consecutive benchmarks can kill a battery in 2 hours.
Battery life is a subjective, I haven't thought of a way to objectively test it. I feel I get the best battery life with CM with its own kernel or Eaglesblood Froyo. Bionix appears to eat batteries.
After seeing these results, I plan to run the Trinity UV11 kernel for awhile and see to see how good the battery life is. The performance increase appears significant for only OC to 1100 and I like the idea of getting the advantages of a little OC/UV without having to run Pimp my CPU.
I have gotten a clear increase (hours more idle time) by simply turning off 4G and only toggling it on when I need it. I use Pandora a lot and it ironically runs better at 2G when I am bicycling (less drops interruptions in the streaming as I move around).

Cubeology said:
Running consecutive benchmarks can kill a battery in 2 hours.
Battery life is a subjective, I haven't thought of a way to objectively test it. I feel I get the best battery life with CM with its own kernel or Eaglesblood Froyo. Bionix appears to eat batteries.
After seeing these results, I plan to run the Trinity UV11 kernel for awhile and see to see how good the battery life is. The performance increase appears significant for only OC to 1100 and I like the idea of getting the advantages of a little OC/UV without having to run Pimp my CPU.
I have gotten a clear increase (hours more idle time) by simply turning off 4G and only toggling it on when I need it. I use Pandora a lot and it ironically runs better at 2G when I am bicycling (less drops interruptions in the streaming as I move around).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Really? I found that these 2 kernels gave me better battery life then the stock cm7 kernel. Also can you add antutu benchmark to the list?

maxesxp said:
Really? I found that these 2 kernels gave me better battery life then the stock cm7 kernel. Also can you add antutu benchmark to the list?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
you are also quoting and talking about a response from 6 months ago which was beginning stages for cm7 on this phone especially kernels lol... Glad you are getting great performance and battery though.

mt3g said:
you are also quoting and talking about a response from 6 months ago which was beginning stages for cm7 on this phone especially kernels lol... Glad you are getting great performance and battery though.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
LOL oops I need to start learning to read dates.. -.-
Sent from my LG-P999 using Tapatalk

some one should run tests again
I tested Trinity vs Faux in AnTuTu and got pretty much same results on charger,but off charger Trinity got about 50 more (6000 off charger and 6125 while charging)
I use UV kernels clocked at 1100.
Switched to Faux because Trinity has bugs like reboot hangs the phone and sometimes waking up take a while. Also boot image and animations are not that nice and boot sound with kernel doesn't even seem to be working.....
Trinity 6004-6120
Faux 5918-6124
CM Stock around 5500

kolyan said:
some one should run tests again
I tested Trinity vs Faux in AnTuTu and got pretty much same results on charger,but off charger Trinity got about 50 more (6000 off charger and 6125 while charging)
I use UV kernels clocked at 1100.
Switched to Faux because Trinity has bugs like reboot hangs the phone and sometimes waking up take a while. Also boot image and animations are not that nice and boot sound with kernel doesn't even seem to be working.....
Trinity 6004-6120
Faux 5918-6124
CM Stock around 5500
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why are you getting such low scores? Not OC'd maybe? I'm using Fauxs newest kernel and my Antutu score was 7566. Average scores around 7300-7600
Sent from my LG-P999 using xda premium

mike7169 said:
Why are you getting such low scores? Not OC'd maybe? I'm using Fauxs newest kernel and my Antutu score was 7566. Average scores around 7300-7600
Sent from my LG-P999 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Faux's newest kernel is ~1.5 correct?
He's probably using the Trinity battery saving kernel clocked at 1.1 and undervolted.
I use the Trinity 1.1GHz kernel and undervolt to -200mV (for the lower ones, leave the top three at stock for stability reasons) and I score around 6100 in Antutu.

redmonke255 said:
Faux's newest kernel is ~1.5 correct?
He's probably using the Trinity battery saving kernel clocked at 1.1 and undervolted.
I use the Trinity 1.1GHz kernel and undervolt to -200mV (for the lower ones, leave the top three at stock for stability reasons) and I score around 6100 in Antutu.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That makes sense. I just did a benchmark @1.1ghz and I got 6007. Ya the Faux kernel max is @1.5ghz. Its undervolted too, not much, just enough to get great battery life.
Sent from my LG-P999 using xda premium

I said in post that I use UV kernels clocked at 1100mhz
I now use Trinity Kernel because Faux did not have 216Mhz option in SetCPU. I also UVed by -25 for now and set charging profile to 400+ Mhz to avoid SoD
I wonder whats the difference in battery life if you use 1100Mhz or 1500Mhz ?

kolyan said:
I said in post that I use UV kernels clocked at 1100mhz
I now use Trinity Kernel because Faux did not have 216Mhz option in SetCPU. I also UVed by -25 for now and set charging profile to 400+ Mhz to avoid SoD
I wonder whats the difference in battery life if you use 1100Mhz or 1500Mhz ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's a significant difference. I don't have any data to back it up. But I've accidentally left it on the max after a benchmark and it would be in a free fall. Especially when playing a 3D game like MC3
Sent from my LG-P999 using xda premium

I've tried using both Kernels as well as stock. Granted they both seem to run better then stock, I'm currently on Trinity with Standard Voltage, because the Under voltage versions of both Faux and trinity seemed to freeze on reboots for whatever reason. They both appear to run about the same set at 1100 which is what I've set to.

I'd like to say thank you for performing scientific and useful benchmarks!

SETCPU in Thunderbolt

I just purchased SETCPU from the market. I know its free here but from what I've read it is well worth 2 bucks (or a lot more).
I'm running bamf 1.0,9 cubed and I verified in setcpu it is set to low of 368 and high of 1 ghz.
I am using stock kernel but thinking of trying adynaline's new kernel.
Anyway should I set a custom profile? Any suggestions on settings? I'm more interested in avoiding screen freeze than speeding up anything.

Profiles are not needed.
They're just usefull if you want to underclock at a certain battery level or temperature to save battery or cool down the device in my opinion.
Sent from my LT15i using XDA Premium App

I just overclocked to 1.28 we'll see how it goes....

recDNA said:
I just overclocked to 1.28 we'll see how it goes....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
should be fine.
i had some profiles of:
screen on - min was as low as it could go, max = 1.4ghz -ondemand
screen off - min was as low as it could go, maz = 5xx mhz - batt saver or conservative
battery at 50%, put max at 1ghz- on demand
battery at 15% max was at 7xx mhz -batt saver/conservative
temp>115 max was 7xx mhz-batt saver
this yeilded pretty good battery life. i am a heavy data user in a 4g area and on a sense ROM i could easily get 12 hours. pushed it over a day with me trying to get the best battery life possible.

Sounds good. I'm also a heavy user.

Profiles aren't needed with a lot of kernels. Some have built in profiles and in others some governors include profiles such as smartass and interactivex.
The only thing I really use it for is if I overclock, which I rarely ever do, and to change the governor.
Sent from my ADR6400L using XDA App

I use SetCPU with imo's latest kernel and I never let it go above the 1.59GHz mark, but that is where I usually put it when charging via AC.

bamf forever already has the ability to set cpu speeds, its in the bamf settings

It says in the op of bamf kernel thread that bamf setting is unable to retain kernel settings so use setcpu.

[Q] What Should I adjust Undervolt settings to on SetCPU that are stable

I am using Tsugi 2.3.4 with the Oyasumi 0.1 UV kernal I want to overclock to 1500 but what settings should I undervolt it to that is stable thanks in advance for the info.

DirtyPISTOLA said:
I am using Tsugi 2.3.4 with the Oyasumi 0.1 UV kernal I want to overclock to 1500 but what settings should I undervolt it to that is stable thanks in advance for the info.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
We can't tell you not all phones are the same, uv a little (10 or 25) run it for a day or two see how it acts, if its steady, uv a little more, when it starts acting up thats your limit go back to previous settings.
NVIDIA NEVER AGAIN!

fcisco13 said:
We can't tell you not all phones are the same, uv a little (10 or 25) run it for a day or two see how it acts, if its steady, uv a little more, when it starts acting up thats your limit go back to previous settings.
NVIDIA NEVER AGAIN!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Alright thanks will try
Sent from my LG-P999 using Tapatalk

I've seen some general advice not to UV for anything over 1ghz speeds as well, but it may not hurt to try if you want and adjust as needed for stability.

I'm running on a -75mv at 1.5Ghz faux kernel 0.4.7..
Perfectly stable, benchmarked AnTuTu, Quadrant, and all those other good stuff.
I have not tried -100mv yet, I doubt it will be stable.

Every phone is different, but I run mine at -20 up to 1 G, and -10 for the rest.

Mine I cant undervolt shoot I have to keep my minimum frequency at 500 to be stable, course I can also run at 1.5 all day (I keep it at 1.2).
Well I guess I can't say I cant UV since I use pimp my cpu and it only gives you options in 25 increments, maybe I would be stable at like -10. But coming from my galaxy s 4g where I could UV over -150 and still be stable, that just doesnt even sound worth doing.
Edit: I just thought about it and maybe the reason I cant UV (more) is because I'm using fauxs pre UV/OC kernel, so I dont even know what stock voltage is. But comparing to my sgs4g at stock voltage I am running considerably lower voltages on the g2x.

The faux thread says it's pre uv at -50 across the board.

Beekersguy said:
The faux thread says it's pre uv at -50 across the board.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I been running it so long and flashed so many friends phones I can't even remember details anymore!
Sent from my LG-P999 using xda premium