GUIMark benchmarks Viewsonic G Tablet and Motorola Droid X
GUIMark over at Craftymind test Flash 9, HTML4 and for desktop browsers Java.
Here are results for Flash 9 and HTML4.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Web browser = Flex | HTML score in fps
-Viewsonic G Tablet CM7 os 2.3
Opera = 7.98 | 7.41
xScope = 9.74 | 8.71
Miren = 9.86 | 9.28
Skyfire = 9.65 | 10.71
Dolphin = 11.45 | 16.6
Browser = 12.08 | 16.14
-Droid X os 2.2
Skyfire 6.14 | 5.02
xScope 11.3 | 4.65
Dolphin 11.15 | 4.84
Miren 11.72 | 6.19
Opera 10.42 | 6.85
Browser 12.35 | 4.92
Default Android Browser and Dolphin HD winners in this round.
Previous Browser Wars winner for Sunspider Javascript
Firefox 4 would not run because not Flash support.
Strange:
Opera runner up previous benchmark, but worst score for the Gtab. Opera on Droid X is fastest for HTML but slowest for Flash 9.
One could also conclude that Flash 10.2 runs about the same on Froyo vs Gingerbread, but the browsers on Gingerbread are faster than Froyo. Almost 3 times faster! How much of that is dual core cpu?
Related
First round will be with Sunspider Javascript benchmarks v0.9.1. I'll throw in the Droid X running Froyo 2.2. Gtab running Cyanogen (mod) 7 Gingerbread 2.3. Both devices running 1 Ghz, and 512 mb ram.
Viewsonic G Tablet 2.3 | Motorola Droid X Froyo 2.2.
Browsers and version, milliseconds listed slowest to fastest.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Skyfire 4.........= 3235 | 8573
Xscope 6.3......= 3041 | 7791
Browser............= 2999 | 7262
Miren 1.2........ = 2995 | 7112
Dolphin HD 4.6 = 2867 | 7050
Opera 11.......... = 1925 | 4306
Firefox 4........... = 1834 | 3635
Also ran on:
Motorola XOOM 10.1" Honeycomb (3.0) tablet
Browser....... 2022 ms
Samsung Galaxy 7"
Browser....... 7294 ms
Firefox 4 takes round 1, but Opera Mobile 11 takes second place and it supports Flash.
Hit my blog for a few other benchmarks.
tabletuser.blogspot.com
Post your tablet, ROM, OS, and score so we can have an idea how other tablets and/or ROMS perform in comparison. I think for $280 the Viewsonic G Tablet is a hard deal to beat, if you have a contender? Hit me with some numbers.
New to this forum, so limited on posting from external sites.
Anyone have the Xoom, or another big tablet they can post scores. I'm interested in how the Archos tablets perform?
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
First time for me to release so many in one day 14 in all.
The historic even happen on 5.19.11!
HCV13.0 B20. All versions get GingerBread OS 2.3 Keyboard to use. On the OS 2.1 version the keyboard is now fits the screen correctly.
Android OS 1.6
FLYTOUCH1
WMT211
WMT212
WMT216
PANIMAGE
WMT216
MAYLONG - M150A10, M150A11, M150A12
WMT211
EKEN - M009
WMT211
Source: VIA | WM8505 300MHZ | WMT8505+ 400MHZ | ANDROID OS 1.6
Android OS 2.1
COBY KYROS - MID7015/MID7015A
8 Different ROM Version
4x Non-HD to not to connect to HDTV
4x HD to connect to HDTV
Also two Patches were released for those who don't want to lose prior settings. Requires B18.
Source: COBYUSA - | TELECHIPS TCC 890X | 800MHZ | 256MB | ANDROID OS 2.1 | 720P | 1080P | HDMI
Is any version of honeycomb or 2.3 woriking for an APAD with 256 RAM 800 Mhz and 2 giga storage?
Dolphin Browser Mini v2.2
Requirements: Android 1.6+
Overview: Something fast, something simple, something new! It is Dolphin Browser Mini.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
New Dolphin Browser Mini aims at providing a friendly user experience for all of you.
Enjoy this new version now and let us know how it works for you.
Highlights:
*High speed responsibility
*Speed Dial Homepage
*Innovative Menu design
*Infinite tabs browsing
*Intelligent back & forward button
*Powerful Copy Text (Select Text)
Features:
*Gesture
*Multi-tab browsing
*Multi-touch pinch zoom
*Tool Box
*RSS Detection
*Bookmarks sync
*Bookmarks/History/Most Visited
*Flash Support for Froyo
What's in this version:
Fixed select text issue on some devices.
Fixed auto-fit issue on HTC Incredible.
Fixed double tap to zoom in/ out in Android mode on HTC devices.
Fixed crash bugs
Change application icon
More Info:
Code:
http://www.dolphin-browser.com/
Download Instructions:
http://www.filesonic.com/file/1611884354/dolphinmini2.2.zip
Mirrors :
http://uploading.com/files/5de61bdf/dolphinmini2.2.zip/
What's the difference between that one and the market one?
https://market.android.com/details?id=com.dolphin.browser&feature=search_result
You do know that the image you have there belongs to Dolphin Browser HD right? So basically you have the image of a different application in this thread. My Original Thread on it is here: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1106011.
theo80 said:
What's the difference between that one and the market one?
https://market.android.com/details?id=com.dolphin.browser&feature=search_result
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There is no difference.
Javelin was launched less than 2 months back. And now, I am putting extra effort in making it work perfect on the Galaxy S4.
I think, Javelin browser is the best browser for Galaxy S4 over Chrome or any other browsers, for the following 3 reasons.
A - MULTI-TASK truly with Javelin Stack.
AKA Link-Bubble functionality. Javelin Stack allows you to Open links in other apps and view in without switching back and forth to the full browser.
B - BLOCK annoying ads
Native ad-block means faster load speeds, use less data.
C - KITKAT TRANSPARENCY
Javelin is the ONLY browser that makes full use of KitKat's transparent status and navigation bars so you can view the entire website on your screen.
Other Javelin features:
[*]1-touch navigation gestures
[*]Built-in VPN
[*]Uses AOSP WebView
[*]Reading mode
DOWNLOAD JAVELIN BROWSER: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.nubelacorp.javelin
JOIN COMMUNITY (for beta releases): https://plus.google.com/communities/106470412179443137104
WEBSITE: http://javelinbrowser.com
(How Javelin Stack works)
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
(Javelin Browser)
------------------
What do you think?
Feel free to reply to the thread on your feedback and if there are any issues on Galaxy S4, so the dev can make Javelin Browser better for current Galaxy S4 owners
I was looking at this article: Water Cooling Flagships Sees Dramatic Performance Improvements and was wondering how the Moto X style performed, so I run a test myself!
Here is the raw data for air cooling, each new column is a new run the geekbench, all these runs were perform one after the other during a 10 minutes period.
Single-core| 1249 | 1274 | 1277 | 1273 | 1271 | 1255 | 1255 | 1258 | 1245 | 1240 | 1241 | 1242 | 1242 | 1238
Multi-core | 3554 | 3556 | 3513 | 3469 | 3500 | 3479 | 3444 | 3392 | 3420 | 3373 | 3381 | 3378 | 3410 | 3346
So our Moto X is doing great with normal air cooling, much like the LG G4 (no surprise as they have the same CPU).
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
I didn't run ice liquid cooled test, as I'm sure the result will be the exact same than the air cooled one.
That is the positive about feeling the heat since part of the design for heat dissipation. Some devices seem to run cooler, but might not. They are covering up the heat and that is not usually a good thing.