These two videos took me by shock when i compared the neocore bnehcmarks. Basically galaxy ace is suppose to be better then motorola defy and htc desire which is funny for a device with 276 mb ram (almost half the size of desire and defy) and yet, it scores 50 FPS when desire is scoring 28 FPS since they both have same GPU and desire has a better processor...kind of confusing fact.
Any comments are more then welcome !
SAMSUNG ACE Neocore test
Samsung Galaxy S vs Motorola Defy vs HTC Desire - Neocore
Samsung Galaxy S not the same as Samsung Galaxy Ace.
Related
Hey !! i am a a hardcore gamer ! because games shows you the power of your phone !!
But i don't now wath is the best phone for games !! is it the Desire Hd or Xperiya play or Samsung galxy S ...... ?? or i wait the futur phones like ! THe htc evo 3D or samsung galxy S 2 or the htc sensation ???
Sorry for my English !!
theangellica said:
Hey !! i am a a hardcore gamer ! because games shows you the power of your phone !!
But i don't now wath is the best phone for games !! is it the Desire Hd or Xperiya play or Samsung galxy S ...... ?? or i wait the futur phones like ! THe htc evo 3D or samsung galxy S 2 or the htc sensation ???
Sorry for my English !!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
playing games consumes a lot of resources (you know it )
i have a htc desire hd... has a 1ghz powerful snapdragon processor, that if you "root" your device and installs a new kernel you can speed up to 1.8ghz!!!!the only thing that can not agree to you is that his big display (4.3")is only an LCD screen.
seems well for gamming but i recommend to you WAIT for thE htc SENSATION.. it´s cool because has A DUAL CORE processor sooooooo powerful!! and has a LED DISPLAY and the best resolution (comparing htc phones)
sensation has more than 1 gb of ram memory....
b
ut xperia play is the most comfortable phone for gamming... 1ghz processor overclockable of course... has the buttons like PSP...and the lastst android version 2.3.3 gingerbread..
But the graphical environment is the worst comparing it with desire hd, galaxy s (galaxy s have better proccessor than desire hd but the same speed) and certainly the sensation
xperia play has a super LCD display. (poor performance comparing with LED panels)
It's better with dual core phone for gaming I guess.. try galaxy s2..
Sent from my X10mini using XDA Premium App
Til the GALAXY S2 comes out, the HTC DESIRE HD tops it
R3XNebular said:
Til the GALAXY S2 comes out, the HTC DESIRE HD tops it
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
the quality of the processor of SGS is better (arm cortex)and counts with GPU technology for better power and battery administration..
also the SGS has better display than DHD, sgs is a superlcd retroilluminated by LEDS (called SUPERAMOLED)
DHD display is a simple LCD DISPLAY (MADED BY SHARP certainly)
and the processor of DHD iS a QUALCOMM SNAPDRAGON...It has less quality than ARM CORTEX...
CONCLUSSION: SGS has better H/W than DHD..
htc Desire HD is my choice
Xperia x10 with any gingerbread rom or xperia play
Sent from my X10 TripNMiUI using XDA App
thanks for your answers ! but i read in the internet that the evo 3d is more powerfull and more fantastic in gaming than the samsung galxy s2 !!
theangellica said:
thanks for your answers ! but i read in the internet that the evo 3d is more powerfull and more fantastic in gaming than the samsung galxy s2 !!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
choose an evo 3d only for gamming is a sacrilege
I invite you to visit his development forum and to explore his capacities to squeeze it to the maximum
I think one with a big screen, like Samsung Galaxy S2.
Guys. I want to have a new used phone..
What to choose?
Samsung Nexus S, Samsung Galaxy S, HTC Desire HD..
Or any phone used to about 300€
go for galaxy s i9000 ... but then galaxy s feels slower too these days! i recommend galaxy s II or motorola atrix
to save repeating myself, see this post : http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=17487969&postcount=9
So what to choose?.. I don´t want HD2 as far as Adreno 200 is too slow
BlackRainX said:
So what to choose?.. I don´t want HD2 as far as Adreno 200 is too slow
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
??[in bold] and the hd2 is certainly not too slow, it runs mango as fast as a native device and bliss sense 3.5 works sweetly on there.
Its a cheap device too running it at £150 max for a good second hand device.
Up to you
I want Desire HD. I want Android on it not WP7. Also Sense 3.0.
Adreno 200 = Graphics Chip
Ok guys,i have been arguing with my brother who has a better phone,my galaxy 3 versus his wildfire.ive done some researching,and where i find it my phone is better. Here are some specs
Galaxy 3:
CPU:Samsung S5P6422 667 MHz
GPU:FM3DSE-its apparently some samsung's low gpu,but our galaxy 3 devs are working on it to make it better
RAM-256 mb
Multitouch-yes,even 10 point on cyanogenmod firmwares
Overclock-up to 1.4 ghz,1.2/1.3 stable
Wildfire:
CPU-528 arm11
GPU-no gpu
Multitouch-yes
Overclock-i dont know.
Someone please provide me some more wildfire specs so we can make a better comparsion
Sent from my GT-I5800 using xda premium
www.unwiredview.com/2012/03/12/dual...er-in-the-uk-for-249-98-shipping-on-april-23/
I'm really excited for its launch here in Brazil. It should be coming really soon (first quarter, or so the rumors says).
I will keep the business in the family
ME WANTZ ACE 2
Herpderp Defy.
Need to save money for it
No idea when it will come in India.
Sent from my GT-S5830 using xda premium
What are it's nearest competitors (when considering price range - processor power)
Bakuron said:
What are it's nearest competitors (when considering price range - processor power)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Galaxy R (Dual-core 1Ghz ARM-Cortex A8/9 with Tegra 2)
LG Optimus 2x (This one is obvious)
Motorola Defy (I think it's not sold anymore - TI OMAP 3630 Dual-core 800Mhz with PowerVR SGX530)
Galaxy S Advance (Not very sure about phone specs)
Nokia Lumia 808 Pureview (Don't get me started)
Herpderp Defy.
Thanks man. Had a quick look at your suggestions:
R is bigger (i personally find Ace size optimal for a phone rather than PDA) and more expensive (another £60), so the Ace2 = more bang for buck.
Optimus, very similar, better spec(?) - dislike the 4 hardbuttons layout.
S Advance appears to have 1ghz dual core. But at this stage looks like a 295£ phone.
Wouldn't touch a Nokia smartphone.
Ace 2 it is then!
The new acepta Its really Cool !! ;D
Sent from my GT-S5830 using XDA
Bakuron said:
Thanks man. Had a quick look at your suggestions:
R is bigger (i personally find Ace size optimal for a phone rather than PDA) and more expensive (another £60), so the Ace2 = more bang for buck.
Optimus, very similar, better spec(?) - dislike the 4 hardbuttons layout.
S Advance appears to have 1ghz dual core. But at this stage looks like a 295£ phone.
Wouldn't touch a Nokia smartphone.
Ace 2 it is then!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The 2x is almost similar to the R , with Tegra 2 as well
Herpderp Defy.
More suggestions:
Samsung Galaxy W (Probably a smaller version of Note)
Galaxy Note (Quite huge)
Galaxy SII (everyone's favourite)
Galaxy Ace Plus (LOL it's not that bad)
HTC Sensation XE/XL (XE = beats , XL = bigger screen)
HTC Edge (is it out yet ? Lol)
Motorola Defy+ (An upgraded version of my phone)
The badass Xiaomi phone (LOL)
Samsung Focus S (WP7 variant of SII)
Herpderp Defy.
Note really is massive.
W is a good equivalent, but prefer dual-core.
Sensation is another 100£ more. S II another 200£
Edge seemingly not available yet.
Xiaomi doesn't look too bad at all!!! - http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/27/xiaomi-phone-review/
Defy+ 4 buttons, sorry just not for me.
Ace + should be Ace pointless.
Focus S is a Windows phone...aka yuck.
Sony solo. 3.7 bravia screen. 1ghz dual core. 5mp camera. Floating touch (just move your finger over the screen). Will get ics.
Sent from my GT-S5830 using xda premium
Kepas said:
Sony solo. 3.7 bravia screen. 1ghz dual core. 5mp camera. Floating touch (just move your finger over the screen). Will get ics.
Sent from my GT-S5830 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Solo or Sola? http://mobilesyrup.com/2012/03/13/sony-makes-the-xperia-sola-official/
1gig dual-core with a 1350mah battery sounds...interesting.
And guess what....this is a succesor season.S2 gets a successor--The samsung Galaxy S3...behold.The 1.8 Ghz Quad core processor phone...Now available as pre-order:
The Galaxy S III will come with a 4.6-inch Super AMOLED Plus touchscreen with a resolution of 720 x 1280. This means a ‘retina’ quality pixel density of 319ppi.Specifications include an Exynos 4212 quad-core 1.8GHz processor, 2GB RAM, 16GB of internal storage, a 12MP rear facing camera, a 2MP front facing camera and 4G LTE connectivity.It will also have version 4.0 of Samsung’s TouchWiz interface and we understand that it will run Google Android 4.0 Ice Cream Sandwich.
My ACE is better than all phones
Other phones sucks! GO AHEAD GALAXY ACE!
The samsung galaxy ace 2 VS the samsung galaxy w.
These two very similar phones are driving me insane, I can't choose between them, so I could really do with some help.
Part of it comes down to lower power duelcore vs more powerful single core.
But there is also NFC capability, and how all this effects the battery?
Is powering two cores worse for the battery than powering one huge one? ram is also a concern, average vs better than? is trading processor for ram ok, how will that effect the experience?
The prices I can get them for ace 2 £220 (this price does not include unlocking it) http://www.carphonewarehouse.com/mobiles/choose-tariff/SAMSUNG_GALAXY_ACE_2/PPAY/NEW
galaxy w £230 http://www.amazon.co.uk/Samsung-I8150-Galaxy-Free-Smartphone/dp/tech-data/B005HBKGXS Help me android community, you're my only hope.
(I've been looking into it for a good while now, here's what I've found) http://geekaphone.com/compare/Samsung-Galaxy-Ace-2-vs-Samsung-GALAXY-W http://www.gsmarena.com/samsung_galaxy_ace_2_i8160-4559.php http://www.gsmarena.com/samsung_galaxy_w_i8150-4114.php http://www.phonearena.com/phones/compare/Samsung-GALAXY-Ace-2,Samsung-GALAXY-W/phones/6940,6098
Thanks for reading this far!
I've personally had the galaxy w/exhibit ii and loved it. It was fast and zippy and the screen was amazing. I think it came with a single core 1.0 GHz processor and 512 mb of RAM, so it was pretty fast specs wise. There is also a sizable amount of development for it as well. Also $200 for a phone this powerful was well worth it.
I don't know much about the galaxy ace 2, but I can personally vouched for the galaxy w.
Ace2 better than w
Sent from my GT-I8160 using xda app-developers app
I think Samsung galaxy w better, because the CPU Clock is 1,4 GHz and Ace 2 is only 800MHz. These both is NOT UPGRADEABLE TO ICS .
Elwino2.3 said:
I think Samsung galaxy w better, because the CPU Clock is 1,4 GHz and Ace 2 is only 800MHz. These both is NOT UPGRADEABLE TO ICS .
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ace 2 has 800 MHz DUAL CORE