Related
Hey everyone,
I was running Quadrant after flashing Cog 2.2/Froyo with OCLF. Everything seems to go faster but the 2D and 3D performance - I can definitely tell that the framerate is lower in those two tests than before. Am I crazy?...
Lencias said:
Hey everyone,
I was running Quadrant after flashing Cog 2.2/Froyo with OCLF. Everything seems to go faster but the 2D and 3D performance - I can definitely tell that the framerate is lower in those two tests than before. Am I crazy?...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I noticed that framerates were lower as well, but only about 4 or 5 FPS. A drop this small isn't really all that significant, and 3D performance at 40 FPS rather than 44 FPS is still much better than a phone like the EVO which runs at like 18 FPS, so I wouldn't really worry that much
Yeah, I noticed it too. I'm also noticing other slowdowns, like a lag on the app drawer screen between my finger swipes and corresponding animations on the screen. If I swipe left or right, the actual swiping animation happens a split second later (noticeable lag). Something tells me this isn't the release build of this rom.
I'm also noticing that the battery dies much quicker with this new rom. I'd get about 2 days of use out of JH7 with the amount I use the phone, with JI6 I'm lucky if I get 8-10 hours.
Actually the benchmark result is quite amazing id say
It scores 1900+ in quadrant standarf
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using XDA App
Lencias said:
Hey everyone,
I was running Quadrant after flashing Cog 2.2/Froyo with OCLF. Everything seems to go faster but the 2D and 3D performance - I can definitely tell that the framerate is lower in those two tests than before. Am I crazy?...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You are crazy... Quadrant is for SNAPDRAGON PHONES... STOP USING IT!!!
Use Neocore, that is a better FPS than quadrant. I still get 55.5/6 with Neocore so 3d performance is not degraded, at least not on my phone.
I'd expect some continued optimization of Froyo 2.2. Remember how laggy JF6 was? Then it got way better with JH2/3/7. I expect progress like that with the Froyo builds as well. With OCLF, JI6 is actually fairly impressive speed wise.
kennethpenn said:
I'd expect some continued optimization of Froyo 2.2. Remember how laggy JF6 was? Then it got way better with JH2/3/7. I expect progress like that with the Froyo builds as well. With OCLF, JI6 is actually fairly impressive speed wise.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hmm.. did you do anything after you flashed, like cleared dalvik cache and whatnot? Mine is actually running slower (UI-wise) than JF6
Its funny you posted this because I noticed it as well today when I ran Quadrant just to see what it would get. I think Quadrant is a horrible tool for benchmarking now since it can be so easily manipulated, but I did notice the FPS drop myself.
Gles 2/1 is perfectly fine, i scored 46fps on nenamark, so no need to worry about 3d performance, i do admit 2d does stutter a little tho.
designgears said:
You are crazy... Quadrant is for SNAPDRAGON PHONES... STOP USING IT!!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Take the man's advice! Quadrant is an awful way to measure performance on the Captivate. Quadrant is biased towards Snapdragon processors, and isn't all that accurate.
Sent from my Cognition 2.2 powered Captivate using XDA app.
It's running fine for me.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using XDA App
Actually using NenaMark1 which is a benchmark app specifically for OpenGL2.0 I get slightly higher scores than on 2.1.
designgears said:
You are crazy... Quadrant is for SNAPDRAGON PHONES... STOP USING IT!!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
dg, may as well save your breath. No matter what is said or done, there will always be people who complain that X is slower than when it was Y and be sure that they are right (and will argue they are right to their dying breath).
Synthetic benchmarks are b***it on a multitasking OS anyway, at any given time any thread can tie up a resource the synthetic benchmark needs or it may not. The only way you could truly benchmark something like this while still allowing multitasking would be with a long range sample like a few hours, the 30 -70 seconds Quadrant runs is a worthless snapshot in time.
They all think they are getting an answer but all they are really doing is using a magnifying glass on a Seurat and wondering why they don't get the big picture. Of course the performance issue couldn't be one of the apps they have installed or that has updated since the last time they benchmarked.
I have 206 apps installed on my captivate with even a ridiculous amount like that and more stuff than the average running I can still get a quadrant score of over 950, its a snapshot in the middle not an effective way to judge a film.
For everyone whinging about reduced "3D" performance, is the actual handset slower in real, day to day use?
This is stock 2.1 Firmware vs stock 2.2 Firmware.
Not Cognition/custom rom with lagfix vs Stock 2.2.
As much as I don't like benchmarks, in this they are only confirming the slow downs I'm seeing in real world use on the leaked froyo rom. (Not cognition)
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using XDA App
The first time I flashed 2.2 I saw some lag in the form of occasional black screens and delayed responses, even after installing OCLF.
I used Odin One-Click to flash back to JF6 and did a master clear before installing Cognition 2.2. Immediately applied OCLF before doing anything else. Not seeing the black screens and delayed responses this time. Some are suggesting it's the master clear that helps.
As for 3D performance, animations and scrolling between homescreens are a lot smoother than they were in 2.1. Games run awesome too. The only two places I notice some skippyness are in the app drawer (not often though, and very minor) and in the browser (this is due to a known memory leak bug).
1randomtask said:
For everyone whinging about reduced "3D" performance, is the actual handset slower in real, day to day use?
This is stock 2.1 Firmware vs stock 2.2 Firmware.
Not Cognition/custom rom with lagfix vs Stock 2.2.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, I actually never bothered benchmarking, but I'm experiencing noticeable lag between swipes and corresponding animations in the app drawer and launcher.
modest_mandroid said:
Yeah, I actually never bothered benchmarking, but I'm experiencing noticeable lag between swipes and corresponding animations in the app drawer and launcher.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have never experienced that on 2.2, even before applying a lag fix. I suggest One-Clicking back to JF6, doing a master clear, and then installing 2.2 again.
No drop vs stock, the overclock kernel gave the extra fps. it also overclocked the gpu by 11%. 4-5 fps out of 40-45 is right in that area.
Edit :.i did a master clear so maybe that's why I don't see a problem
Not all benchmarks will work because our phones are capped at 56 fps. A benchmark needs to bog the gpu down below that for the whole test to get an accurate measurement. Quadrant does that for only party of the test. Many benchmarks can't do that at all.
Quadrant is a decent bench mark but our phones will not see the score increase of a snapdragon with froyo. linpack shows greatly inflated scores on snapdragon froyo devices. Greene computing goes over this on there website.
http://www.greenecomputing.com/
the full version of quadrant shows that the hummingbird and the processor in the droid 2/x mop the floor with the snapdragon in all areas but processing speed. The hummingbird having an edge over the droid x particularly in the 3d area but losing overall because of the rfs file system lag Which is apparently is weighed heavily and the reason the lagfix blows the score out of proportion and the different lagfixes have big gaps in the score while real world performance is not even noticeable.
http://slideme.org/application/quadrant-advanced
Composite scores don't mean anything and that is my gripe with quadrant, there is no way to decide how to weigh file system benchmarks against processor benchmarks against 3d, each area must be compared separately, and the user should be able to decide what that means.
Edit: linpack shows a huge increase over stock. 13.77 vs the 9.61 I got with voodoo and overclock. But still not at the level of a snapdragon. Wait till the next generating of arm processors come out, if you think a snapdragon/hummingbird hybrid would be awesome that's nothing compared to what's in the works. Higher clock speeds and multi-core cpu's aren't far away.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using Tapatalk
How is it that I see alot of people benchmarking 2400+ on the benchmark? I have done the benchmark on the TnT Lite 2.4.0 and Vegan beta4 and both performed around 600-800. This is just from regular flash. Is it overclocking or killing all apps other than the benchmark test before proceeding with test? Does the livewalpaper matter?
Thanks!
I get consistent 2300+, and what you are getting is the behavior of wakeup bug in which when tablet wakeup from the long sleep like overnight, it gets stuck on 500+ quadrant score with subpar performance.
Sent from my PC36100 using XDA App
TnT results should be around:
1800 for 2.2
2400 for 2.4 though 3.1
I had 570 average scores using TnT 3.1 (out of sleep mode or also perhaps a combo of apps- not sure what consistently caused it) and rolled back to 3.0. Could not figure out why, but rolling back to 3.0 made things 2400 again and got me out of lag city.
Just did mine on TnT Lite 3.1.1 and got a score of CRAP.. never mind.. it just Force Closed on me before I could remember what it was. LOL
Standby... time to re-do it.
Ok result is: 2542
rushless said:
TnT results should be around:
1800 for 2.2
2400 for 2.4 though 3.1
I had 570 average scores using TnT 3.1 (out of sleep mode or also perhaps a combo of apps- not sure what consistently caused it) and rolled back to 3.0. Could not figure out why, but rolling back to 3.0 made things 2400 again and got me out of lag city.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I can confirm for stock TNT 3053, about 1800+ consistently.
Jim
I just killed all apps except for 4 essential apps. Got a lower score of 591. The tablet seems responsive to me. Even played some dungeon heros and I did not experience any lag.
I will have to benchmark the other two tablets and see how they do.
Edit: Redid the benchmark after a reboot and got 2356! which is a significant increase-value wise. My eyes and perception of time deceive me though as I do not notice a difference in usability from when I got the 500-600 scores recently to the 2356 after reboot. I will look into the calendar and autostart problems, see if those are what are keeping my scores down.
Reboot, kill any running apps and you should get some high scores (2000+).
jimcpl said:
I can confirm for stock TNT 3053, about 1800+ consistently.
Jim
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Did 2 more tests, after pressing power button to wake Gtab, and got 1800+ for each test. Didn't do anything special like killing tasks. Again, this is with 3053 stock.
Jim
1800+ avgs seem to be the norm for stock on this device.
I don't know if the 2000+ scores are due to real performance gains or because of the partitioning and swap used in prepping the installation of those ROMs. Since Quadrant is synthetic it doesn't handle certain 'optimizations' added by code well and may misreport the scores. In reality 2000+ may really be 1800 or less, and 600 may also be running higher than reported.
Quadrant Advanced is better in that it gives you details. Much of the score we get on the G Tablet is from the powerful CPU and the abundant memory. TnT lite and VegaN may show 'boosts' to things like the I/O which is normally what is misrepresented as it's not weighted in the app. This is why many Galaxy S phones got 'fake' 2000+ scores due to the Lag Fix and in real testing they were performing at nominally higher than their 900 avging stock, but nowhere close to 2200 which is what most would avg. Testing a Vibrant with lag fix reporting 23xx in fact wasn't even working as fast/quick as a desire HD at 19xx.
I still haven't been able to get my device to slow down after sleep, so I guess that's something I'll have to do when I wake up later. Maybe a longer sleep time will aid me in achieving this. I have also tried everything to get the battery to drain faster, just in case there is some correlation...but I'm hovering at 84% and it's bedtime (according to my wife ).
If anyone else out there has Quadrant Advanced and is on stock and getting the slowdown - if you'd run it and give me some numbers I'd really appreciate it.
Numbers for stock 3899 + Google Apps are as follows:
Avg: 1917 in 3 runs. The avg isn't a calculation, it just means that's the score I got on the 3rd run. Under optimal conditions, the CPU should have maxed out by the 3rd run - but some people keep doing it and use the score that tapers off as max. It should get between 1830 and 1930 with stock.
CPU: 4916
Mem: 2730
IO: 1159
2D: 200
3D: 582
I expect the CPU number to be less than 1/2 during a 'slowdown'.
I expect the rest to be roughly the same.
If you're running a ROM like VegaN or TnT...I'm expecting everything to be the same except I/O which will be higher and maybe 2D/3D because of the newer Tegra drivers.
Update! Finally the pad slowed down just now. It's showing 35% on the battery meter. Not that there's any correlation but I've linked it - just because that's the only time I see the slowdown.
Total: 441
CPU: 918
Memory: 547
IO: 293
2D: 47
3D: 398
The slowing of the CPU has taken a toll on everything else. I thought the rest would look alright but that was stupid on my part. When you run a notebook in low power mode (ex: clock it at less than max), it affects performance across the board - so there was no reason that this should be different. Just wasn't thinking :/
Anyway, there we have it. Now to find a way to fix it permanently.
I'm going to set my wifi to turn off when my screen goes off to see if that helps as someone else noted somewhere.
Putting it in airoplane made overnight did not fix the issue. It woke up with bad sleep bug.
Sent from my PC36100 using XDA Appm
OK, I am a kernel dev and just want to tell you of my findings and would want your opinion in what I did...
Anyways, I was able to Overclock this Gtab to 1.6 ghz at 1.350 mv (at least to boot), but it gave me a few instability so I upped the voltage to 1.375mv which had been very stable. So, I opened up the Gtab, ran a few 3d games and benchmarks and touched the tegra 2 CPU and noticed it didn't get that hot. I then though about putting a copper coin or something but then realized it wouldn't help much for...then I realized, DIAMOND..yes Diamond has a great thermal conductivity and heat dissipation.. So I went to Microcenter and bought a Diamond Thermal paste and put a small amount on top of the Tegra 2 chip..and BAM..1.350mv, stable with Dungeon Defender looping for 2 hours with no FC or hangs ..Now it even boots at 1.325 mv and just finished a AnTutu Benchmark (it wouldn't even boot at 1.325mv before)...What's your opinion on this? LMK.
Update:
Not it boots at 1.300mv and just finished an AnTutu Benchmark ...INCREDIBLE..I'll loop with Dungeon Defender and see how it goes
UPDATE:
INCREDIBLE!! Now it boots at 1.250mv at 1.6 ghz.
Update...hang at 1.250..Will try 1.275mv at 1.6ghz
UPDATE: PICTURES OF TEGRA2 CPU with Diamond Thermal Paste
Uh... how much is the diamond thing? I have absolutely no idea what you're talking about because I'm a hardware dummie, but it sounds really cool.
goodintentions said:
Uh... how much is the diamond thing? I have absolutely no idea what you're talking about because I'm a hardware dummie, but it sounds really cool.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'll look for the receipt, but I think it was like 7.99 or something for a tube. Ill check the name. I was also thinking of cleaning up the heatsink/fan on my laptop...so I will apply this Diamond thing too..
Anyways, I finished a loop of Antutu at 1.250mv and I ran Dungeon Defender loop and got a hang Will increase the voltage at 1.275mv and see how it goes.
Update:
It's name says "IC DIAMOND" on the top of it says "Maximum Performance and Reliability" and on the bottom says "7 Carat Diamound Thermal Compound"
Well I am not a programmer but I have been following the kernel threads and I have to say that is stuff to be optimistic about. It not only speaks volumes about all of the devs hard work in getting the most out of the gTabs but also the gTabs potential.
I think this should be shared with Viewsonic and NV in the ongoing effort to have them continue to support this little tablet that could.
suvroadrage said:
Well I am not a programmer but I have been following the kernel threads and I have to say that is stuff to be optimistic about. It not only speaks volumes about all of the devs hard work in getting the most out of the gTabs but also the gTabs potential.
I think this should be shared with Viewsonic and NV in the ongoing effort to have them continue to support this little tablet that could.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not sure if Viewsonic or NV will ever support this procedure. There are just too many variables to consider. I am not even sure if this will hold after a day or two..but will check...Anyways, currently looping at 1.275 mv.
clemsyn said:
Not sure if Viewsonic or NV will ever support this procedure. There are just too many variables to consider. I am not even sure if this will hold after a day or two..but will check...Anyways, currently looping at 1.275 mv.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
VS and NV won't support this procedure because they are unwilling to do anything other than ignore the gtab. I think it is abundantly clear by now that we're on our own with the gtab.
goodintentions said:
VS and NV won't support this procedure because they are unwilling to do anything other than ignore the gtab. I think it is abundantly clear by now that we're on our own with the gtab.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just got pimpmycpu working with my kernel. Will release a new batch of kernel with support for the program. Just awaiting approval from cpasjuste
clemsyn said:
OK, I am a kernel dev and just want to tell you of my findings and would want your opinion in what I did...
Anyways, I was able to Overclock this Gtab to 1.6 ghz at 1.350 mv (at least to boot), but it gave me a few instability so I upped the voltage to 1.375mv which had been very stable. So, I opened up the Gtab, ran a few 3d games and benchmarks and touched the tegra 2 CPU and noticed it didn't get that hot. I then though about putting a copper coin or something but then realized it wouldn't help much for...then I realized, DIAMOND..yes Diamond has a great thermal conductivity and heat dissipation.. So I went to Microcenter and bought a Diamond Thermal paste and put a small amount on top of the Tegra 2 chip..and BAM..1.350mv, stable with Dungeon Defender looping for 2 hours with no FC or hangs ..Now it even boots at 1.325 mv and just finished a AnTutu Benchmark (it wouldn't even boot at 1.325mv before)...What's your opinion on this? LMK.
Update:
Not it boots at 1.300mv and just finished an AnTutu Benchmark ...INCREDIBLE..I'll loop with Dungeon Defender and see how it goes
UPDATE:
INCREDIBLE!! Now it boots at 1.250mv at 1.6 ghz.
Update...hang at 1.250..Will try 1.275mv at 1.6ghz
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Which MicroCenter? I thought about doing something like this but wasn't sure how much it would help. I guess this answers my question.
clemsyn said:
Just got pimpmycpu working with my kernel. Will release a new batch of kernel with support for the program. Just awaiting approval from cpasjuste
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wanna talk in english? No idea what pmcpu is.
I take it that pimpmycpu will NOT work with your
current kernels?
goodintentions said:
Wanna talk in english? No idea what pmcpu is.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Want to learn? This isn't preschool, if you don't understand a term, search for it. Not that hard to do.
albright said:
I take it that pimpmycpu will NOT work with your
current kernels?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It does now with my modified version of PimpmyGtab and kernel
I'd love to see pictures of what you did with your cpu Clemsyn.
If you get a chance, that would be awesome!
1.6? Holy moly! Can't wait to check it out!
tekrhino said:
1.6? Holy moly! Can't wait to check it out!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Got it at 1.7 actually, grabbed the second place in Antutu Benchmark Rankings. Second only to Dell Streak 7 (and their screen resolution is a less than the Gtabs which is the reason their score is high). Highest temp was 58 degrees
1700000mhz - 1450mv (stable at the moment) This is the max I am doing... I have a feeling 1.8ghz will need at least 1625mv...I am not risking my friend's Gtab for that
Tostino said:
I'd love to see pictures of what you did with your cpu Clemsyn.
If you get a chance, that would be awesome!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ill take pictures after 48 hrs and see how it is doing.
AnTuTu System BenchMark
@clemsyn,
Howdy, Wanted to thank you for your work. Also need to commend tjohnsonjr on his Awesome GingerBread. And then, gojimi for his excellent launcher ( I highly recommend it. The docking of apps around 3 sides is scrumptious.)
G-Tab Configuration:
[ROM-AOSP]G-Harmony Gingerbread 2.3.3 with Honeycomb elements(UPDATED 4/17)
Clemsyn1.5GingerExtra.zip
Using CPU Master to set min and max to 1500 Mhz
Able to use Pimp My Cpu to drop voltage at 1500 Mhz to 1200 mV.
AnTuTu benchmark of 5032-5368
Once you have the GingerBread version of you PMCPU available, I would like to try the 1600 and 1700 Mhz values. At present, can't go beyond 1500 Mhz.
But, THANK YOU for all you do!!!!!
Once he reads my onslaught of PMs, clemsyn should have T25 spec 400mhz gpu working.. Although, mileage may vary.. It definately increased my graphics scores.. some benchmarks like quadrant already hit the ceiling as far as refresh rate and all that.. so that may not improve..
Picture of tegra 2 on Gtab with thermal paste uploaded
hmm?! You are just using thermal paste as a heatsync?? That is kinda strange, I mean I guess it increases it's thermal mass a little, but using thermal paste to attach a flattened penny (pre-1982) or something would do MUCH more to increase the thermal mass.
I am just wondering why the Sensation is only hitting around 80MFlops at most in Linpack @ 1.5GHz. It seems that this phone should be getting 100+ every time. I have also noticed that the single core may score 55MFlops while the multicore will only raise that to 60MFlops.
Does it have something to do with the Java libraries? I also saw something about NEON libraries?
I think the highest I've ever scored with my Sensation is 91MFlops.
Thanks for any input on this guys. I know it's just a benchmark, but I'm just curious.
EDIT: Just scored a 27. I'm just gonna uninstall this app and use AnTuTu. How does this CPU ACTUALLY perform against other high end CPUs?
snelan said:
I am just wondering why the Sensation is only hitting around 80MFlops at most in Linpack @ 1.5GHz. It seems that this phone should be getting 100+ every time. I have also noticed that the single core may score 55MFlops while the multicore will only raise that to 60MFlops.
Does it have something to do with the Java libraries? I also saw something about NEON libraries?
I think the highest I've ever scored with my Sensation is 91MFlops.
Thanks for any input on this guys. I know it's just a benchmark, but I'm just curious.
EDIT: Just scored a 27. I'm just gonna uninstall this app and use AnTuTu. How does this CPU ACTUALLY perform against other high end CPUs?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Qualcomm actually has better floating point calculations than others, it's one of the benefits of the dragons. If you're using Sense, try linpack on Vanilla and it will be higher. Sense & benches don't go together b/c of something HTC screwed up.
http://www.nordichardware.com/news/...lcomm-demonstrates-new-msm8660-processor.html
what exactly is a floating point calculation?
Awesome, thanks!
By Vanilla, do you just mean a stock ROM without Sense? Would CM7 work? I just installed CM7 and set my min max to 1620/1620 and topped out at 101MFlops, but that was only out of 3 runs.
Does this also mean that Sense has slower real-world performance? Or just for benchmarks?
snelan said:
Awesome, thanks!
By Vanilla, do you just mean a stock ROM without Sense? Would CM7 work? I just installed CM7 and set my min max to 1620/1620 and topped out at 101MFlops, but that was only out of 3 runs.
Does this also mean that Sense has slower real-world performance? Or just for benchmarks?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah cm or aosp, sense has always been slow with benches since the HTC hero. It doesn't play nice with any bench really, compare the same phone on sense and vanilla and scores are different. I don't know much about floating points but its probably related to how fast things are calculated. The hummingbird had a lower linpack than the scorpions of that time. And this doesn't mean sense is slower but it rapes the phone's ram excessively. When ics is out benches should be done to see how this phone really performs, most of the 1 core is sleep anyway or not at max.
Sent from my T-Mobile Sensation 4G using XDA App
One important thing:
When you score in multi-thread is just about 10 points above the single-thread score, it's because your second core (CPU1) didn't go online, or simply too late, so multi-thread was just using one core
Try this: with root explorer, go to sys/devices/system/CPU/CPU1/online
in this file replace 0 by one, then save. Immediatly set the permissions to read only (on "write" is ticked by default, untick it)
Now your both cores are always online, ready to scale up, and multi-thread scores will always be far superior to single-thread.
(it's not sticky, everything we go back as it was after a reboot)
Also my very best score with Linpak was 115, at 1.782ghz, CPU1 forced online, I posted a screenshot somewhere in Bricked kernel thread. This is a real battery drain and hot device to get this score
In real life, 90 or 95 at 1.5ghz is pretty good
i900frenchaddict said:
One important thing:
When you score in multi-thread is just about 10 points above the single-thread score, it's because your second core (CPU1) didn't go online, or simply too late, so multi-thread was just using one core
Try this: with root explorer, go to sys/devices/system/CPU/CPU1/online
in this file replace 0 by one, then save. Immediatly set the permissions to read only (on "write" is ticked by default, untick it)
Now your both cores are always online, ready to scale up, and multi-thread scores will always be far superior to single-thread.
(it's not sticky, everything we go back as it was after a reboot)
Also my very best score with Linpak was 115, at 1.782ghz, CPU1 forced online, I posted a screenshot somewhere in Bricked kernel thread. This is a real battery drain and hot device to get this score
In real life, 90 or 95 at 1.5ghz is pretty good
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wow! Never knew about that, I just assumed that the second core's clocks were off or something. Thank you very much good sir!
Hi guys, just got my HOS yesterday and am extremely happy with it! However something has been bugging me. Benchmarking scores on quadrant.
I know that we should all take benchmarking scores with a pinch of salt, as it does not determine the real world usage of the phone. But seeing everyone consistently getting high 4000s to 5000s on the net and me only getting low 4000s is worrying me.
When I first got my phone, I quickly set up my phone and once that was done i installed the quadrant to feast my eye. It scored 4600+, and I did several more times with reboots here and there and it was all nearly the same give and take 100+. I then did a factory reset wondering why I can't get the score any higher and ended up now only scoring from 4200 to 4500+ tops.
Wonder if there's a problem with my device?
Anyone?
Quadrant is basically a random number generator
Sent from my HTC One S using xda premium
Most of us have rooted devices with custom roms/kernels with their own little goodies and enhancements. Overclocking and changing the governor will generally increase benchmark scores.
@above, that is mostly true. This is a valid statement for any benchmarker.
I get 5013 on stock. Stop worrying. Quadrant is not accurate
Yeah just got my One S and experiencing the same, it's not lagging but I've read it should be 5000 stock but I've maxed at about 4600
I've gotten 4600 and 5200, then uninstalled.
blastx said:
Hi guys, just got my HOS yesterday and am extremely happy with it! However something has been bugging me. Benchmarking scores on quadrant.
I know that we should all take benchmarking scores with a pinch of salt, as it does not determine the real world usage of the phone. But seeing everyone consistently getting high 4000s to 5000s on the net and me only getting low 4000s is worrying me.
When I first got my phone, I quickly set up my phone and once that was done i installed the quadrant to feast my eye. It scored 4600+, and I did several more times with reboots here and there and it was all nearly the same give and take 100+. I then did a factory reset wondering why I can't get the score any higher and ended up now only scoring from 4200 to 4500+ tops.
Wonder if there's a problem with my device?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I got my US T-Mobile One S on release date with 1.53 build and got 5300+ on quadrant. Rooted with custom kernel I have gotten close to 5800.
I heard that the update to 1.84 build on stock phones brought the quadrant scores down to mid 4000s. So there is nothing wrong with your phones that were bought with 1.84 build.
Sent from my HTC One S using Xparent Cyan Tapatalk 2
stemnin said:
I've gotten 4600 and 5200, then uninstalled.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Read in several other threads everyone else is experiencing the issue, so the benchmark drop after the HTC system update is completely normal. The update improves network and signal but apparently lowers quadrant scores, the device is not noticeably slower though.