Hey all just a quick question, obviously with the 1.8 OC on the Inspire this thing is blazing. But what is the battery life like at these OC's or even the voltage differences between stock 1 ghz 1.3 and say 1.8? I really just don't want to get the phone and OC it to keep it fast/smooth but have my battery last like 5 hours. So any insight about how much OCing affects battery life would be appreciated. Thanks!
Clienterror said:
Hey all just a quick question, obviously with the 1.8 OC on the Inspire this thing is blazing. But what is the battery life like at these OC's or even the voltage differences between stock 1 ghz 1.3 and say 1.8? I really just don't want to get the phone and OC it to keep it fast/smooth but have my battery last like 5 hours. So any insight about how much OCing affects battery life would be appreciated. Thanks!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
well overclocking will drain your battery down faster. I would install setcpu from the market and set you clock speeds really low with the screen is off. This will help save battery when the phone is not in use.
Related
Hey, I'm a new to overclocking and was wondering what you guys have found to be the best settings on your Transformers using setCPU?
What are your settings for:
Fastest...
Best battery life but still usable...
Which kernel are you using? I'm using Netformer 1.5 and I just have it overclocked to 1.2Ghz. Honestly though, I don't really notice much of a difference in performance or battery life compared to 1Ghz
yeah I've been playing around with Netformer too and I don't notice much either way either. Thanks for the input.
I know overclocking is all the rage for more performance. I myself would prefer the gains of overclocking (probably wouldn't be 1.7 ghz atm since that is the performance based kernal, but 1.5 ghz might be doable) with a combination of undervolting for longer battery life.
I know when I was considering a viewsonic gtablet, that most of the kernals that overclocked also undervolted at the same time (how much depended on the kernal and how much of an overclock too).
Advantages to overclocking are pretty obvious, more performance. Undervolting makes the processor (this case SOI) run off of less power, thus more battery life (can be significant if undervolted enough) and less heat, which translates into a tablet that potential has a longer life (heat overtime wears away at life of SOI/processors and sometimes other components), plus much lower risk than overclocking. I undervolt all my laptops, I mostly get my laptop with 3 hour battery life to 3 hr 30min or even 3 hr 45 min on a moderate undervolt. A little undervolting could take this tablet from 8-9 hours to possible 11-12 hours of battery life (plus a little overclock included will add some performance too).
Do any of the present kernals out there try this? If not, I would like to make a request for such a kernal.
Undervolting might cause the TP to be unstable and crash.
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App
neer2005 said:
Undervolting might cause the TP to be unstable and crash.
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
it would need to be done in small increments just like overclocking. Same methods are used undervolting as you would overclock. Yes they could both cause instability, if you double the clock speed or cut the voltage in half, it takes time to know the limit of the SOI by using small increments.
You will need to your favorite custom kernel and adjust the volts yourself using Govnah.
But then I also was reading on forums on webosbuzz and you can have screen wake issues to with undervolting
Metalshadowx2 said:
But then I also was reading on forums on webosbuzz and you can have screen wake issues to with undervolting
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Really? If that is true, I wonder how undervolting would cause that.
The webos-internals-testing kernels include initial experiments with undervolting.
im currently on icbinb kh1 with the gingerbread enhancers. im interested in overclocking but i want better battery life. the undervolt settings in the gingerbread enhancer has worked great for me. does anybody have a setup that they feels increases performance while offering better battery?
the best solution is factory clock settings. If you want performance, you're going to sacrifice battery. If you want battery, you're going to sacrifice performance. Think of it as a sliding scale.
thats not necessarily true. i overclock at 1.3 on my phone and it lasts about 3 days with normal use.
if you have bali uv installed, its already undervolted, so you can overclock at higher frequencies. with the right things in place, there is no big negative tradeoff.
look in the icbinb thread for anyone else overclocking. i no longer undervolt using the given values cause it caused freezing. i use stock with a level 0 of 1.3. works great. battery lasts forever. no complaints.
jager555 said:
look in the icbinb thread for anyone else overclocking. i no longer undervolt using the given values cause it caused freezing. i use stock with a level 0 of 1.3. works great. battery lasts forever. no complaints.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I use the same settings on ICBINB but on 1.3 I only get about 13-15 hours of battery life without charging. Guess its just different for each person based on usage.
i like 1.2 uv fast and pretty good on life.
frequency=1200000, 800000, 400000, 200000, 100000
core_voltage=1230, 1080, 1005, 905, 855
int_voltage=1090, 1050, 1000, 980, 950
scaling_governor=ondemand
thanks i just wanted people to chime in with setting that worked for them, try a couple out
im running aokp build 30 and franco kernel on my galaxy nexus and theyre just slaughtering the battery. it comes with a small battery to start, just 1750mah, but this is worse than when i was on stock rooted ics. i had the cpu governor on interactive but i could watch my battery percentages by the minute so i switched over to conservative and it may have slowed down a little. What's causing this? Franco is touted for its battery life, but ive heard a lot of complaints about the latest builds. aokp build 30 has been around for 2 days so... any ideas? preference on kernels?
do one thing goto cwm
Advanced> wipe Battery status
It's better to use cpu tuner and underclock the device when screen is off...try...
I heard that the battery of nexus is not good.so Samsung now providing a battery of 3000 mA check it..
Xperian8~ click thanks if it helps...
OK I'll do that with cwm. aokp comes with the ability to set CPU. any advice on underclocking because I don't know what to do or what to set it to. I didn't know Samsung was doing a 3000mah deal, thought it was 2100?
yes they are..i read that news on gsmarena.com you can search that...
topic>>
Underclocking is setting the max clock frequency to below than the original frequency
Create a profile and you can trigger your cpu settings in screenoff
Create a new profile and underclock..during testing it cause instability so don't check set on boot option..try
Xperian8~ click thanks if it helps...
the only 3000mah battery deal i could find was on accessorygeeks for $25. is that too good to be true?
seems like too good of a deal to be true though.
i understand what underclocking is, i meant to ask what should i set it to? should i change the voltage as well?
and im having a little trouble with your english, can i only create a profile through the cpu tuner app?
I am sorry for my bad English..
You can underclock it max to 600 and min frequency to 122mhz
Yes try cpu tuner and add profile set CPU setting as above mentioned...k?:beer:
Xperian8~ click thanks if it helps...
hmm ok, will the underclock have much effect on performance?
and whats the difference between setcpu and cpu tuner? (i have the setcpu apk already)
try after change it
shyamjptpm said:
do one thing goto cwm
Advanced> wipe Battery status
It's better to use cpu tuner and underclock the device when screen is off...try...
I heard that the battery of nexus is not good.so Samsung now providing a battery of 3000 mA check it..
[...]
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://www.xda-developers.com/andro...-battery-stats-does-not-improve-battery-life/
battery life on my gnexus is fine. (cm9 nightly)
ianonymousguy said:
the only 3000mah battery deal i could find was on accessorygeeks for $25. is that too good to be true?
seems like too good of a deal to be true though.
i understand what underclocking is, i meant to ask what should i set it to? should i change the voltage as well?
and im having a little trouble with your english, can i only create a profile through the cpu tuner app?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If it seems to good to be true, it isn't true. Be sceptic of too good battery deals, alot of products are just badly labled and produce alot worse results than what their description states.
You can go as low as your device still works reliably, same goes for the voltage.
I would just search a bit, there are surely others who experimented with clock speed and voltage, i read an article some time ago about battery drain getting actually worse if you clock too low, shame i can't find it atm.
ianonymousguy said:
hmm ok, will the underclock have much effect on performance?
and whats the difference between setcpu and cpu tuner? (i have the setcpu apk already)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
On the basic level over voltage and frequency control? Probably no difference.
If you look at extras, i.e. scale depending on certain events there might be some differences.
The thing about the gnex's battery is that its a measly 1750mah, one of the smallest ive seen in new releases. like the razor maxx has a 3300mah battery...
good thing to keep in mind about that skepticism, but do you think $25 for a 3000mah battery is a fair, not-scam deal? i cant post links yet, but if you get a chance, search accessorygeeks . com for a 3000mah gnex battery and tell me what you think of that deal.
and thanks, ill look into what other people have done for their clocking.
Looks okay, makes the sleak gnexus quite bulky though .
I know there are some threads out there that have addressed this topic, but none are for the HOX at least that I can find
I am trying to find out if there is an empirical data that points to the best combo of Kernal/ROM for batter life?
As of right now, I am using RageXL 1.0.3 with the Elemental 6.7 kernal. I have it overclocked to 1.7gHz with the standard voltages. I also ran the Supercharger script in the ROM
I have used VenonXL in the past and it seemed to kick a$$ but with the stock kernal
Also, I understand that there are a myriad of settings that can affect battery/ performance and makes this question very tricky to answer. I am looking sort of the general consensus of the situation
Pretty much all sense ROMs have good battery life. You can clock it lower for better battery.
RollTribe said:
Pretty much all sense ROMs have good battery life. You can clock it lower for better battery.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This.
My best battery was with elemental 6.7, max clock was 1.5 and min was 192 with intellidemand governor and ROW scheduler. Also, I undervolt to 800. Be careful with voltage though, most phones can't handle it.
Sent from my HTC One X using xda premium
RollTribe said:
Pretty much all sense ROMs have good battery life. You can clock it lower for better battery.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's the first thing I noticed about Cyanogenmod. Much lower battery life. I installed SetCPU - will that fight Elemental 6.7's clock settings?