Database Info

4000 Quadrant Score ?!?!

**** just got real for HD2s. Major props to Darkstone1337, using his build in my sig with no mods or set cpu Thanx to Cotulla & team for making all this possible for us HD2ers, we're living the dream

Seems like quadrants probably skipping a step or two. Everything else looks pretty good though.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App

allthrottle said:
Seems like quadrants probably skipping a step or two. Everything else looks pretty good though.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No step skipping, some of the build is stored in the RAM which is faster than NAND And to think I almost got a Vibrant

Htc hd2 quadrant score over 4000 without overclocking on super nand ram with magldr
phoenixtraveller said:
Hi.
What are people getting on quadrant scores with this (DARKSTONE super-nand-ram rom-IMG) ???
I got 4050. OVER 4000!!!
That is on an Australian HD2 (850mhz with 2.08 radio and magldr 1.11).
and NO OVER CLOCKING AND NO TWEAKS - second boot (first reboot).
Can you make this version compatible with 1536OC kernel or any OC kernel?
THANKS.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ALSO: anyone tell me how to get Ubuntu working on NAND/MAGLDR?

using a loop device mounted in ram ?
not a real file system...

fards said:
using a loop device mounted in ram ?
not a real file system...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No loop device, The majority of system, lib, & framework live there

I thought everyone understood that quadrant scores don't really mean anything anyway....

...

deathsled said:
I thought everyone understood that quadrant scores don't really mean anything anyway....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It is a nice way of getting a benchmark of a ROM, but it doesn't represent 'real' usage. Sometimes a device getting 2000 odd can easily out-do a device getting 3000+. It's not the most accurate test.
But getting 4000+ is pretty cool (provided it's legit )

not being mean, but there's no way in the world that anyone not overclocked (especially with an outdated cpu) is getting 4000 on quadrant. the dual core phones at 1GHz are only getting about 2600+. my personal quadrant score of 4055 is clocked at 1.8 GHz on the 2nd generation Snapdragon 1GHz processor. the HD2 has a first generation one. I realize quadrant isn't the most reliable, but 4000 doesn't exist for the first generation processor. By the way, what are they clocking up to at this point?

Assuming that this genuine..
I'll do what everyone seems to have missed saying, congratulations and well done!
Swyped from HTC Desire S using XDA Premium

[Q] OC Experience anyone?

I'm currently running phoenix ultimate w/Tagrak.
It's OC'ed at 1.3 GHz ATM.
It has made a seeming performance change to my phone. But i want to take it further and OC to 1.5 or even 1.6 if possible. After hours of researching, the CPU in the Cappy is capable of running at 1.6 at the fastest.
Does anyone know any APP that will allow you to OC higher than 1.3 GHz? and has OC'ed higher than 1.3?
Thanks a bunch

What kernel are you running? AFAIK the only kernel that supports 1500/1600mhz is Onix, which is the kernel I'm running. Best OC experience I've gotten on the captivate was 1344. I was using Phoenix with the Paragon 1344 kernel.
Once you get Onix, voltage control will let you OC to 1600, but you might not even be able to hit 1400 and stay on for more than 5 mins (my situation)
I'm pretty sure this should be in Q/A, no?

There is already a thread in this section (currently 4 posts down) about this topic.

I've been running a custom oc at 3200mhz stable for 3 days now.

ninjuh said:
I've been running a custom oc at 3200mhz stable for 3 days now.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
3.2ghz?? On what your laptop???

studacris said:
3.2ghz?? On what your laptop???
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
no reason the chip cant do that running @ 3volts with dry ice or liquid nitrogen cooling

superasian827 said:
I'm currently running phoenix ultimate w/Tagrak.
It's OC'ed at 1.3 GHz ATM.
It has made a seeming performance change to my phone. But i want to take it further and OC to 1.5 or even 1.6 if possible. After hours of researching, the CPU in the Cappy is capable of running at 1.6 at the fastest.
Does anyone know any APP that will allow you to OC higher than 1.3 GHz? and has OC'ed higher than 1.3?
Thanks a bunch
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
the kernel needs to support the different timing modes used. onix will allow up to 1600. to my experience nearly all phones go up to 1200 a vast majority to 1280-1300 im barely stable @1300 myself. but 1344-1400 is the limit with only a few exceptions. every chip is different and i have a feeling the earlier phones had less consistant manufacturing. samsung may also be cherry picking chips that clock better for the galaxy s 2 mini which is supposed to be a hummingbird clocked up to 1400 out of the box.
keep in mind that 30% overclock is significant. if i tried that on my pc it wouldn't run very long.

I can get mine stable at 1.4 using Onix kernel and Serendipity rom. I tried 1.5 and 1.6 but was not able to get it to run.

I've come to the conclusion that OC achieves very little... UV even less.
Sent from my Captivate

Dani897 said:
keep in mind that 30% overclock is significant. if i tried that on my pc it wouldn't run very long.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My computer has just over a 35% overclock on the CPU...
I went from 2.8 GHz to 3.8 GHz.
Sent from my Captivate

MikeyMike01 said:
My computer has just over a 35% overclock on the CPU...
I went from 2.8 GHz to 3.8 GHz.
Sent from my Captivate
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
A ) im guessing not on the cheapo heatsink they sold you with the cpu unless it is one of those "black edition" something or other chips that are marketed towards overclockers
B) i dont see aftermarket heatsinks out there for cell phone processors

Dani897 said:
B) i dont see aftermarket heatsinks out there for cell phone processors
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just wondering. Is it at all possible to squeeze in an effective heat sink on the captivate? would be an interesting mod to have.

My Cappuccino can run at 1400 stable, but the extra 400 MHz didn't really make a difference.
CM7 Inspire 4G

Quadrant scores?

I know that quandrant is not a good benchmark because the results depends on the hardware installed (CPU qualcomm or samsung or TI OMAP), but my question is:
Desire S in quadrant advanced reach a score of 3000 in the CPU section; the xperia arc, with the same CPU reach a score of 5500 in the cpu section. They are both on gingerbread....so why this difference?
Also the desire HD with froyo and the same Qualcomm CPU reach a 5500 score...
I can't uderstaind!
sorry 4 my english

My wife just got her Des S, and Mega jump is lagging
Quadrant score is 1000-1200
how can it happen with an Adreno 205 inside?
it has 1.28.401.1 ROM on it. do you experience it with other ROMs too?

liljom said:
My wife just got her Des S, and Mega jump is lagging
Quadrant score is 1000-1200
how can it happen with an Adreno 205 inside?
it has 1.28.401.1 ROM on it. do you experience it with other ROMs too?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i've got no lag at all....

ilbulgaro89 said:
i've got no lag at all....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
no lag on Mega jump? not even when you pick up a rocket?

liljom said:
no lag on Mega jump? not even when you pick up a rocket?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
no lag at all in this game

ilbulgaro89 said:
no lag at all in this game
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
and what is your Quadrant score?

liljom said:
and what is your Quadrant score?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
around 1240

ilbulgaro89 said:
around 1240
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yeah, that is the max I can get too
the funny thing is, that my Desire HD with a Desire S port performs better; same CPU, GPU and screen resolution; and no lag in megajump :/

liljom said:
yeah, that is the max I can get too
the funny thing is, that my Desire HD with a Desire S port performs better; same CPU, GPU and screen resolution; and no lag in megajump :/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yeah, I also do not explain the differences in benchmark scores with this 2 devices

i gave my opinion of why the lower scores in this thread here:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1036668
basically there has been a general trend on most phones that gingerbread performs lower than froyo on benchmark tests and performance. this is certainly been my experience. and since the desire s is running gingerbread, while the desire HD is running froyo (i think, right?), that is your answer right there...

Since the Desire S is the "first" device from HTC dressed in Gingerbread...can we safely say that it wasn't an optimized Gingy version that HTC brought up?
If all the Desire family get their Gingerbread update (Classic, HD, Z) and did perform well in benchmarking, that would leave Desire S...????

RogerPodacter said:
i gave my opinion of why the lower scores in this thread here:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1036668
basically there has been a general trend on most phones that gingerbread performs lower than froyo on benchmark tests and performance. this is certainly been my experience. and since the desire s is running gingerbread, while the desire HD is running froyo (i think, right?), that is your answer right there...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
you are right
I run Gingerbread on my DHD, and the Quadrant is lower
I thought it's because we don't have the gingerbread sources for DHD, and we don't have the right drivers
but still, DHD has 1500-1600 in Quadrant (compare to 1200) with DS 1.28 port :/ and that's a big difference with the same CPU, GPU

liljom said:
you are right
I run Gingerbread on my DHD, and the Quadrant is lower
I thought it's because we don't have the gingerbread sources for DHD, and we don't have the right drivers
but still, DHD has 1500-1600 in Quadrant (compare to 1200) with DS 1.28 port :/ and that's a big difference with the same CPU, GPU
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i ask it in this thread for this reason: dhd has an higher results with desire s gingebread porting......a my friend has in test a developer version of incredible s with gingerbread 2.3.3 and his quadrant score is 1450 (higher than desire s...but with same hardware)

ilbulgaro89 said:
i ask it in this thread for this reason: dhd has an higher results with desire s gingebread porting......a my friend has in test a developer version of incredible s with gingerbread 2.3.3 and his quadrant score is 1450 (higher than desire s...but with same hardware)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
2 things can save us:
-we find the way to root DS
-we get a good update from HTC

DS is relatively still a "baby"
we'll get there eventually

ilbulgaro89 said:
i ask it in this thread for this reason: dhd has an higher results with desire s gingebread porting......a my friend has in test a developer version of incredible s with gingerbread 2.3.3 and his quadrant score is 1450 (higher than desire s...but with same hardware)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
well maybe your friend's incredible s is overclocked, or he has some other type of customization that you are not aware of. because what i am trying to say is that, stock 2.2 vs stock 2.3, there is a performance and quadrant drop, significantly. stock 2.3 may get around 1250 quadrant, and stock froyo may get around 1650 quadrant. i get 1200 on 2.3, but i can over clock to maximum and get 1400. but somethign still isnt right, because i could over clock on 2.2 and get 1700.
also, people say quadrant scores are meaningless. but this has gotten mis interpreted on the web. quadrant scores are meaningless BETWEEN DIFFERENT PHONE MODELS. but quadrant definitely has meanign within the same device. so if your device runs 1600 on 2.2, then 1200 on 2.3, that is a meaningful piece of data. benchmark shows the ability of your phone to do various tasks like scroll a list, load some html or javascript, or parse a bunch of data. so it annoys me when others (not in this thread) say quadrant is meaningless. what the original statement meant was that lower device A could be optimized very well to be smooth, while higher device B could be better hardware, but optimized poorly to not be smooth, and a benchmark would not tell this story. i agree wtih that. but not within the same device i dont
i also see slower choppy scrolling in 2.3, for example tapatalk threads and lists were smooth in 2.2, but choppy and chunky in 2.3, etc. and the benchmark seems to agree with that.

RogerPodacter said:
well maybe your friend's incredible s is overclocked, or he has some other type of customization that you are not aware of. because what i am trying to say is that, stock 2.2 vs stock 2.3, there is a performance and quadrant drop, significantly. stock 2.3 may get around 1250 quadrant, and stock froyo may get around 1650 quadrant. i get 1200 on 2.3, but i can over clock to maximum and get 1400. but somethign still isnt right, because i could over clock on 2.2 and get 1700.
also, people say quadrant scores are meaningless. but this has gotten mis interpreted on the web. quadrant scores are meaningless BETWEEN DIFFERENT PHONE MODELS. but quadrant definitely has meanign within the same device. so if your device runs 1600 on 2.2, then 1200 on 2.3, that is a meaningful piece of data. benchmark shows the ability of your phone to do various tasks like scroll a list, load some html or javascript, or parse a bunch of data. so it annoys me when others (not in this thread) say quadrant is meaningless. what the original statement meant was that lower device A could be optimized very well to be smooth, while higher device B could be better hardware, but optimized poorly to not be smooth, and a benchmark would not tell this story. i agree wtih that. but not within the same device i dont
i also see slower choppy scrolling in 2.3, for example tapatalk threads and lists were smooth in 2.2, but choppy and chunky in 2.3, etc. and the benchmark seems to agree with that.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
my friend's incredible s is a stock phone updated to Gingerbread via OTA today...without any type of hack...incredible s is not rooted!

My understanding was that Gingerbread is quite a bit slower than Froyo in Quadrant tests.
In real use though, it seems fine.
I suppose we'll have more idea when 2.3.3 upgrades become available for devices currently running 2.2.x.

njd said:
My understanding was that Gingerbread is quite a bit slower than Froyo in Quadrant tests.
In real use though, it seems fine.
I suppose we'll have more idea when 2.3.3 upgrades become available for devices currently running 2.2.x.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Desire HD came out with 2.2, and now it runs 2.3, and yes, the Quadrant went down

njd said:
I suppose we'll have more idea when 2.3.3 upgrades become available for devices currently running 2.2.x.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
On htc-hero score was equal on 2.2 and 2.3 (both overclocked CM-ROMs)
On my NexuS with 2.3 I have scores about 2500 @ 1GHz (and crazy >3000 @ 1,4GHz)
On the DesireS I only get 1200 @ 1Ghz (equal performance gov or ondemand)
Wired is the totaly different fps: desireS has 50fps at the "planet3D" where Nexus has only 20fps; in the "doom3D" it is vice versa
But in everyday use there is no big difference - I tend to sell the NexuS, but really not sure wich phone I should keep..

Overclocked HTC Sensation ! :)

Hi all,
I have my HTC Sensation finally overclocked
I am using an custom rom
and I use this kernel : •RCMix Sensation kernel 1.0 revision 2 (2.00 GHz)
With setcpu I use autodetect speed.
But 1 bug..
I can overclock till max of 1.6 ghz.
When I overclock till 2.05 ghz the phone going off and then turns back to normal ghz 1.18
What can I do to overclock it to 2ghz another kernel ??
Because I read the sensation can overclock to 1.89ghz but that kernel dont work with 2.3.4

Dude overclocking is really broken right now. The settings will inky stick to the first core and the other core will just sit at 1gz or so. Bad news. Best to wait until the developers can figure it out better.
Sent from my Cyanogenmod hungry Htc Sensation.

aha yes.. I had also that mention..
Because in SetCpu you see just 1 core at 1.5ghz..
the other core you dont see so that one will be 1.2 or less..
Better to wait..
*Where can I see if there is new info about this ? which thread.. site
Thanks for this advice !

Why It is possible to overclock just at 1.3?

Hi guys.
I wanted to ask you something, because in our sl i9003 is the maximum possible overclock 1300 mhz?
The Artex-A8 processor is not it?
It should be a very powerful processor, but even though I've always overclocchi various lag to 1.3, with any rom.
And my device has no flaws ..
So, back to the main question .. because the maximum overclock is only 1.3?
Now I'm using the rom with the look dell's3 and formatted EXT4 but is slow and full of lag .. Help!
Thanks.
I'm wrong or sI9000 can be overclocked more with the same cpu?

davibs said:
Hi guys.
I wanted to ask you something, because in our sl i9003 is the maximum possible overclock 1300 mhz?
The Artex-A8 processor is not it?
It should be a very powerful processor, but even though I've always overclocchi various lag to 1.3, with any rom.
And my device has no flaws ..
So, back to the main question .. because the maximum overclock is only 1.3?
Now I'm using the rom with the look dell's3 and formatted EXT4 but is slow and full of lag .. Help!
Thanks.
I'm wrong or sI9000 can be overclocked more with the same cpu?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
are u confused in between i9000 or i9003 phone?
Max overclock i9000 - 1.6ghz (i think)
Max overclock i9003 - 1.38ghz

vishal24387 said:
are u confused in between i9000 or i9003 phone?
Max overclock i9000 - 1.6ghz (i think)
Max overclock i9003 - 1.38ghz
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No , he would be know why for our phone the max overclock is 1.38 ghz.. I would it know to..
Sent from my GT-I9003 using XDA

Our Max is 1.45(I think can't rmb). Each chip has different oc capabilities, my g3 could oc from 667mhz to 1.4ghz with no problems .
Cheers
Sent from my GT-i9003 powered by Stable and Smooth CyanogenMod 9!

Could so anyone develop a kernel with 1.45 ghz ??
Sent from my GT-I9003 using XDA

redflash52 said:
Could so anyone develop a kernel with 1.45 ghz ??
Sent from my GT-I9003 using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As I said I don't rmb clearly, but its in 1.4-1.45 ghz
Cheers
Sent from my GT-i9003 powered by Stable and Smooth CyanogenMod 9!

Well, you can easly push your phone at 1500MHz (BCK kernel feature: Evolved sysfs interface for variable overclock or underclock), but the phone is not usable. I tried once to slowly change the frequency to see my limit and @1400MHz the phone became unusable.
Other than being unstable because, quoting XDA_Bam, "Anything more than 10% higher than the highest stock frequency is likely to be unstable", I think the voltage set for the 5th OPP is too low for anything higher than 1300MHz (maybe I'm wrong).
Proof? here.
Actually, this is "fake". To take this screenshot I had first disabled the 5th OPP, then I changed its frequency so that CPU Spy showed 1500MHz even though I wasn't really using it. The time spent at that frequency was actually the time the CPU spent at 1200MHz before I had disabled the 5th OPP
I did that to show you that it's actually possible to (easly) change the max frequency to anything higher 1380MHz.
EDIT:
And BTW devs are continuosly improving this device, we were first limited to 1100MHz, now some phones are stable at 1300MHz. Remember that our cousing (I9000) is older and has a huge community.
EDIT 2:
"I'm wrong or sI9000 can be overclocked more with the same cpu?" => "I'm wrong or sI9000 can be overclocked more with a totally different cpu?"

vishal24387 said:
are u confused in between i9000 or i9003 phone?
Max overclock i9000 - 1.6ghz (i think)
Max overclock i9003 - 1.38ghz
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
EDIT: -Looks like i am wrong too?

davibs said:
I'm wrong or sI9000 can be overclocked more with the same cpu?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You are wrong: the CPUs are different
i9003 has TI OMAP 3630 1GHz and i9000 has Samsung S5PC110 1GHz (code-named "Hummingbird")
Cortex A8 is just instructions and specifications for CPU. It's like DX10 for GPU. You can say Nvidia XXX card supports DX10 and AMD YYY supports it, why clocks for these cards and overclock potential are different?

I think the cpu of the i9000 is wors then the from i9003 so why is the i9000 overclocked to 50% and in our is it only 35%?
Cuold we not work on an overclock like 1.45 ghz for our phone ? Would it be unstable or is it because we need developers that can make it stable?
Sent from my GT-I9003 using XDA

redflash52 said:
I think the cpu of the i9000 is wors then the from i9003 so why is the i9000 overclocked to 50% and in our is it only 35%?
Cuold we not work on an overclock like 1.45 ghz for our phone ? Would it be unstable or is it because we need developers that can make it stable?
Sent from my GT-I9003 using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But can anybody tell me that whats the use of such higher OC (1.45ghz) when u can do same stuffs smoothly on 1.2 ghz easily??? Also OC looks very attractive feature but in my opinioin its a deadly battery killer feature. OC upto 1.35 ghz is more than sufficient (I am satisfied with 1ghz max with superb performance & good battery backup).
Instead of wasting time on overclocking developers should work on overclocking gpu, kernel 3.0 or video codec, video recording in cm7, cm9, miui, aosp roms. Because for now thats a big problem for our phone.

vishal24387 said:
But can anybody tell me that whats the use of such higher OC (1.45ghz) when u can do same stuffs smoothly on 1.2 ghz easily??? Also OC looks very attractive feature but in my opinioin its a deadly battery killer feature. OC upto 1.35 ghz is more than sufficient (I am satisfied with 1ghz max with superb performance & good battery backup).
Instead of wasting time on overclocking developers should work on overclocking gpu, kernel 3.0 or video codec, video recording in cm7, cm9, miui, aosp roms. Because for now thats a big problem for our phone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am with you, we reached the limits of "smoothness" really (On stable roms, we shouldn't blame hardware when using buggy or incompletete roms or even stupid samsung roms.)
It would be better if devs focus on the GPU.

redflash52 said:
I think the cpu of the i9000 is wors then the from i9003 so why is the i9000 overclocked to 50% and in our is it only 35%?
Could we not work on an overclock like 1.45 ghz for our phone ? Would it be unstable or is it because we need developers that can make it stable?
Sent from my GT-I9003 using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Remember when OCing just happened on our device? we were limited to 1080 Ghz, then to 1100 Ghz, then to 1200 Ghz/1300 Ghz, and now 1380 Ghz, devs will always figure out a way to squeeze more power and keep it stable, it needs time and effort.
The Galaxy S has a different CPU (That has lower OC potential then ours theoretically if i remember correctly) but has a bigger number of developers, it was released in 2010, our device was released in 2011 so it is kinda new.

vishal24387 said:
But can anybody tell me that whats the use of such higher OC (1.45ghz) when u can do same stuffs smoothly on 1.2 ghz easily??? Also OC looks very attractive feature but in my opinioin its a deadly battery killer feature. OC upto 1.35 ghz is more than sufficient (I am satisfied with 1ghz max with superb performance & good battery backup).
Instead of wasting time on overclocking developers should work on overclocking gpu, kernel 3.0 or video codec, video recording in cm7, cm9, miui, aosp roms. Because for now thats a big problem for our phone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes of cours but some developers can't fix this bugs.. But maybe they are able to overclock the phone (like uc team) and i think it's not a battery killer.. If i have battery problems i buy for 10 € a new battery.. Some games and if i have 2 apps open the phon is luggy.. Maybe with an haiey overclock it will be smoother
Sent from my GT-I9003 using XDA

Remember guys, even if you OC the CPU, there will always be the weight of our outdated GPU dragging us down. Even if we OC to 1.45Ghz, you will always experience little bits of lag due to our PowerVR530. If I compare my friend's stock I9000 (No Mods, No Root, No OC:1Ghz) to my I9003 (with OC 1.38Ghz). My friend's I9000 will always be smoother due to both an advanced CPU and GPU.

FeelLikeASir said:
Remember guys, even if you OC the CPU, there will always be the weight of our outdated GPU dragging us down. Even if we OC to 1.45Ghz, you will always experience little bits of lag due to our PowerVR530. If I compare my friend's stock I9000 (No Mods, No Root, No OC:1Ghz) to my I9003 (with OC 1.38Ghz). My friend's I9000 will always be smoother due to both an advanced CPU and GPU.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Only their GPU is superior..
If someone could OC the gpu, we can probably reach their performance.

Skander1998 said:
Only their GPU is superior..
If someone could OC the gpu, we can probably reach their performance.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The uc team has tried but it seems the gpu frequency is locked
Cheers
Sent from my GT-i9003 powered by Stable and Smooth CyanogenMod 9!

bscraze said:
The uc team has tried but it seems the gpu frequency is locked
Cheers
Sent from my GT-i9003 powered by Stable and Smooth CyanogenMod 9!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nope
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1451218&highlight=gpu+overclock
V9:
-Performace gpu and test overclocking to 300Mhz.
-Apply patch swa sources.(Many thanks to xda_bam)
-fix some small fix codes.
-Add vurrutCWM with many addons

Skander1998 said:
Nope
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1451218&highlight=gpu+overclock
V9:
-Performace gpu and test overclocking to 300Mhz.
-Apply patch swa sources.(Many thanks to xda_bam)
-fix some small fix codes.
-Add vurrutCWM with many addons
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes as they said they're testing, they themselves said there is no way they can confirm its working
Cheers
Sent from my GT-i9003 powered by Stable and Smooth CyanogenMod 9!

bscraze said:
Yes as they said they're testing, they themselves said there is no way they can confirm its working
Cheers
Sent from my GT-i9003 powered by Stable and Smooth CyanogenMod 9!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But in the next version 9.1 they stated that they lowered the OC, (Still OCed) and this is the latest working version.
V9.1:
-Fix problems in recovery.
-Reduce overclock gpu to 220Mhz.
-Voltage ajustement.