Can we update to get the latest OpenGL standard/drivers? Not sure if our PowerVR can suport it, but was surprised that a new product didn't have it out of the box.
Msm 8255 doesnt have a powervr gpu. It's got a Qualcomm adreno 205 and it already supports OpenGLes 2.0
jasonyump said:
Msm 8255 doesnt have a powervr gpu. It's got a Qualcomm adreno 205 and it already supports OpenGLes 2.0
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
OPPS!! Thanks for the info on GPU.
Quadrent only shows 'OpenGL ES-CM 1.1'. My Tegra2 devices show 2.0.
Related
http://nena.se/nenamark/view?version=2
Tmobile Galaxy S2 with Snapdragon (Qualcomm Adreno 220) - 54.5 fps
Galaxy S2 with Exynos (ARM Mali-400 MP)- 45.42 fps
I wonder if they test on same Android version. 2.3.4 & 2.3.5 is giant leap in performance.
nraudigy2 said:
http://nena.se/nenamark/view?version=2
Tmobile Galaxy S2 with Snapdragon (Qualcomm Adreno 220) - 54.5 fps
Galaxy S2 with Exynos (ARM Mali-400 MP)- 45.42 fps
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's probably a higher clocked version, guess Samsung weren't pleased with its performance at stock. Would be interesting to see what kind of battery performance it gets.
Where did that score get from? Anyway it's still early, it's just 1 result for that entry. I'm also getting 57.6fps on mine if I overclock it. but on the other hand there are huge improvements to be had on the driver side on the Adreno family so maybe Qualcomm finally got its ass on working and the new T-mobile version comes with new drivers.
Well T-Mobile Ver. is clocked at 1.5Ghz whereas S2 is 1.2Ghz, it can give a performance boost. Unless Adreno has improved the driver or something.
nraudigy2 said:
http://nena.se/nenamark/view?version=2
Tmobile Galaxy S2 with Snapdragon (Qualcomm Adreno 220) - 54.5 fps
Galaxy S2 with Exynos (ARM Mali-400 MP)- 45.42 fps
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
very interesting
Adreno 220 is always up to 260+ MHz on clock, meanwhile Mali 400 it's only at 167 MHz, but it can be overclocked to 400 MHz.
In Anandtech's Qualcomm S4 article, Adreno is like ATI's desktop cards. The shaders can be pretty fast if you can write code to fully utilize them.
I have AT&T Infuse and currently using ROM MIUI v1.10.21, baseband UCKJ2.
Is my phone a ARMv7 or ARMv6?
I did a Quadrant and CPU is ARM Cortex A8 (Hummingbird). So that mean i'm ARMv8?
Thx.
cat2115 said:
I have AT&T Infuse and currently using ROM MIUI v1.10.21, baseband UCKJ2.
Is my phone a ARMv7 or ARMv6?
I did a Quadrant and CPU is ARM Cortex A8 (Hummingbird). So that mean i'm ARMv8?
Thx.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why does it matter? Are you going to to developing or something ha. I think its 7, but therez a big chance its an 8. I think 8 is dual core though, and I know tegra2 is 9, but I'm pretty sure its seven. Someone correct me if om wrong ha.
the reason i ask cuz i want to install font and not sure if i should download ARMv7 or ARMv6 created by a community called CAUG (Cambodia Android Users Group).
The hummingbird is a Cortex A8, so yeah.
Only the OMAP4, Exynos(beast), and Tegra 2 are Cortex A9.
Sent from my phone. :3
I know its confusing, cortex A8 is actual v7. The designations may refer to different things but all the A8 processors i've seen also say v7.
The Instruction set is ARMv7. The processor branding is CORTEX A8... like pentium, or Athalon. A = application processor, can be M A or R for different tasks, this sigifies a qualification for certaint tasks. , 8 signifies a speed level.
ARMv7 with NEON extension, if you're interested in downloading a codec pack with performance optimizations.
Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Pro (Nexus 7 2013 Version), Adreno 320 with 2GB* of Ram or MediaTek MTK6592 (Octa-Core), Mali-450MP4 with 1GB* Ram?
Just want to know what hardware is better.
*Not GPU dedicated Ram
namertamer101 said:
Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Pro (Nexus 7 2013 Version), Adreno 320 with 2GB* of Ram or MediaTek MTK6592 (Octa-Core), Mali-450MP4 with 1GB* Ram?
Just want to know what hardware is better.
*Not GPU dedicated Ram
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
go with the 2 gigs, mali and mediatek are terrible GPU's/CPU's snapdragon and adreno beats the crap out of them. octa core means nothing, phones dont need 8 cores xD quad is just fine.
Can anyone compare among Mali 450MP4, Adreno 305 and Adreno 320? Which one is best for gaming and multi-tasking?
Mali 450MP4 does have 4 cores but is the performance good enough? A lot of phones like Alcatel OneTouvh Idol X+ are using Mali GPU with Mediatek processor.
andy_ray said:
Can anyone compare among Mali 450MP4, Adreno 305 and Adreno 320? Which one is best for gaming and multi-tasking?
Mali 450MP4 does have 4 cores but is the performance good enough? A lot of phones like Alcatel OneTouvh Idol X+ are using Mali GPU with Mediatek processor.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Adreno 320 is obviously better than the 305. MediaTek sucks. I don't know how the Mali 450 compares to the Adrenos, but MT sucks.
Adreno 320 (100%)>>Mali 450MP4(70%)>>Adreno 305(33%)
the percentages give you a fair idea of how powerful each is compared to the adreno 320...
for more..
http://kyokojap.myweb.hinet.net/gpu_gflops/
Which is better:
Adreno 305 or Mali 400?
androidhtcdev said:
Which is better:
Adreno 305 or Mali 400?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Adreno 305 is a bit faster than Mali 400 MP4