Cronos Project - Motorola Milestone Android Development

what happened to them? why is the original thread locked? what GPL violation?

http://www.tux.org/lkml/#s1-18

All my links to cronos sites say
"Temporarily Offline
Sorry, the site is offline. We'll be back soon.
I just received an GPL violation message in my mailbox from gpl-violations.org. I will have to put everything offline until further notices from them... "
Tjey were o on yesterday/
PK

Sounds like he has it sorted out (finally) and will be GPL compliant once the site is back online.

I know this isn't a dev thread - however - the last cronos thread got locked:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=803717
with no apparent reason. Any ideas what happened there?

MuF123 said:
I know this isn't a dev thread - however - the last cronos thread got locked:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=803717
with no apparent reason. Any ideas what happened there?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm still curious too, the room moderator asked to wait and stop asking, but I think that now a whole month is passed and still no clear explanation about the case.
BTW is still curious that a site where WM roms (proprietary and copyrighted SW) were and are still freely shared, so worried for a (minor I presume) GPL violation.

The Solutor said:
I'm still curious too the room moderator asked to wait and stop asking, but I think that now a whole month is passed and still no clear explanation about the case.
BTW is still curious that a site where WM roms (proprietary and copyrighted SW) where and is still freely shared so worried for a (minor I presume) GPL violation.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It was my thread..they said because source was not made public and that all of cronos roms r banned..politics bro..he is briliant and they want his secrets
Sent from my Milestone using XDA App

He tweeted that he got a note for tainting the kernel, they say he was inserting non-GPL code (which cannot be subsequently used) into his updates.
Sent from my Milestone

Which is all well and good for his releases for other phones, but for the milestone rom, the arguement is pretty void, as we are stuck with moto's kernel.
Sent from my Milestone using XDA App

I agree with gemini002.
I have tried CM6 and my phone gets very very hot very fast when surfing on 3G while Cronos (which is based on CM6) doesn't heat up that fast.
I am using Cronos ver.1.8.1 now and the battery drain over nights when I am sleeping is just 10% while CM6 flat out my battery in 8 hours.
So yeah.. Cronos has got something special in his ROM and people want to know his secret.
I am happy with ver.1.8.1 except for the video recording not working. So waiting for Cronos update to fix it.

Guys, don't start this again please. The last thread like this was locked for a reason.

Related

Beta honeycomb port for Gtablet available.

There is a semi working port of honeycomb for the g-tablet available from the below link. I looked through the threads and could find no mention of this.
http://rom-honeycomb-for-gtab-12.com/
brainyjd said:
There is a semi working port of honeycomb for the g-tablet available from the below link. I looked through the threads and could find no mention of this.
http://rom-honeycomb-for-gtab.com/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Most of the threads regarding this are in the G tablet General forum...
brainyjd said:
There is a semi working port of honeycomb for the g-tablet available from the below link. I looked through the threads and could find no mention of this.
http://rom-honeycomb-for-gtab-12.com/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You need to look harder.
The thing is, because its not being developed/released on xda its not mentioned in the Development section.
sorry - It makes sense that this is not in the dev thread
It makes sense that this is not in the dev thread but it is big news and I skim for new post every day in the dev section and did not see any. Sorry I wish I could delete this post.
brainyjd said:
There is a semi working port of honeycomb for the g-tablet available from the below link. I looked through the threads and could find no mention of this.
http://rom-honeycomb-for-gtab.com/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's actually still in ALPHA not Beta
Not development. Moved to general.
It's here, and looks great but some features dont work.. still great
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1065220
theimpaler747 said:
Not development. Moved to general.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm curious about this since the project obviously IS development, but is being moved to General every time a thread references it.
Is this happening because Roebeet is now, for some reason no one has shared, persona non grata around here?
I mean, I guess it makes sense if he is no longer part of the XDA "family" but it still seems kind of silly.
I believe it is because the DEVELOPMENT is happening elsewhere.
Sent from my Xoom using Tapatalk
nunjabusiness said:
I'm curious about this since the project obviously IS development, but is being moved to General every time a thread references it.
Is this happening because Roebeet is now, for some reason no one has shared, persona non grata around here?
I mean, I guess it makes sense if he is no longer part of the XDA "family" but it still seems kind of silly.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's not that at all..
Development is for the actual development of something and by the developer of that something, not the discussion of things being developed elsewhere regardless of who is developing it.
A good example.....CM7, the primary source tree for all Gingerbread built ROMs on the Gtablet is discussed in General as well because CyanogenMod is not posting their development and issues....it's others just talking about it.
The easiest way to think of it is that the development forum section is for a developer to post on their work and get feedback.
If it's not your work and you aren't doing the "developing" on it.....post it in General.
This really makes me want to punch whoever that drove roebeet away. Seriously, the guy is as dedicated as you can expect any dev who's doing this out of pure hobbyist enthusiasm.
The guy actually spent his valuable time to give us honeycream. Whoever that accused roebeet of any ill intention and effectively drove him away, shame on you. You should go and buy an ipad and leave us gtabbers alone.
When you think about it viewsonic made this all possible by releasing the 1.2 bl. In the end they have given us honey creams...
The honey comb port is from another device that uses a compatible or similar bl.
Roebeet is simply ironing out the gtab specific bugs. But therew are numerous bugs, so his work is much appreciated.
I definitely hate following the development on an outside site from xda. Because I love this community. But it is what it is.
Sent from my ADR6300 using Tapatalk
goodintentions said:
This really makes me want to punch whoever that drove roebeet away. Seriously, the guy is as dedicated as you can expect any dev who's doing this out of pure hobbyist enthusiasm.
The guy actually spent his valuable time to give us honeycream. Whoever that accused roebeet of any ill intention and effectively drove him away, shame on you. You should go and buy an ipad and leave us gtabbers alone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well said goodintentions !!
I don't agree with some of your posts,
but this one I can't agree more.
goodintentions said:
This really makes me want to punch whoever that drove roebeet away. Seriously, the guy is as dedicated as you can expect any dev who's doing this out of pure hobbyist enthusiasm.
The guy actually spent his valuable time to give us honeycream. Whoever that accused roebeet of any ill intention and effectively drove him away, shame on you. You should go and buy an ipad and leave us gtabbers alone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You can find him on slate droid and he is working on honeycomb.
Last edited by jerdog; Today at 02:00 PM. Reason: Against XDA rules to direct traffic to another tablet/forum site
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Really Jerdog?
I think you take this too far. Just being a jerk now.
I guess you will be removing all links to CM7 huh? Isn't that another tablet/phone/forum site? Those DEV's don't post/host their projects here.
I've never really taken sides in this little spat, but I think this is childish.
It's not like this is just one of many CM7 derivatives. It's the only bootable HC image I know of for the G-tab at this moment. Whatever flaws, issues, malfunctions it may have, many in these forums would like to play around.
This is an amazing rom for an alpha!
Sent from my GTablet-HC using Tapatalk
Zaphod-Beeblebrox said:
It's not like this is just one of many CM7 derivatives. It's the only bootable HC image I know of for the G-tab at this moment. Whatever flaws, issues, malfunctions it may have, many in these forums would like to play around.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Don't worry its all over the General section right now
XDA is merely reaping what some of its members/mods have planted (see: roebeet vs. XDA regarding 1.2 bl), and the more they continue to make a big issue about it the more the members will be trafficking and directing others traffic outside XDA.
Zaphod-Beeblebrox said:
It's the only bootable HC image I know of for the G-tab at this moment. Whatever flaws, issues, malfunctions it may have, many in these forums would like to play around.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thats not the issue here (IMHO), the thing is , everyone who wants to try this ROM needs to load 1.2bl, this just proves that 1.2bl was the way to go (as suggested a month or two ago). The 1.1 <-> 1.2 switch just to try honeycomb will drive many users (at one point or another) to keep using the semi-backed, still alpha, HC release to avoid the overhead of the switch (especially given the rate of advances made in the HC port and bricking risk involved in jumping back and forth). Now all the current ROM developers (in clear contradiction to what XDA advocated) will need to either release 1.2 compatible ROMs or risk loss of interest.
Now all the current ROM developers (in clear contradiction to what XDA advocated) will need to either release 1.2 compatible ROMs or risk loss of interest.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I originally thought that they didn't want to do this becuase they will then have wasted all that time on the 1.1 Roms that are still in development...but then something dawned on me. Roebeet was able to port 3 existing Roms, all that he worked on, to 1.2. One based on TNT lite, one based on Gadam, and one (and probably best Rom I've ever used) based on Vegan. Keep in mind, he had all 3 of these up and running in about 2 days. He's actually been working on all of those, the HC port, and general 1.2 tools all at the same time. He's created direct and simple processes to flash to 1.2, a revised CWM for it, has Pershoot and Clemsyn on board with kernels.
Call me a fanboi, etc...but the man has really put in some major time on the 1.2 projects.
aasoror said:
Don't worry its all over the General section right now
XDA is merely reaping what some of its members/mods have planted (see: roebeet vs. XDA regarding 1.2 bl), and the more they continue to make a big issue about it the more the members will be trafficking and directing others traffic outside XDA.
Thats not the issue here (IMHO), the thing is , everyone who wants to try this ROM needs to load 1.2bl, this just proves that 1.2bl was the way to go (as suggested a month or two ago). The 1.1 <-> 1.2 switch just to try honeycomb will drive many users (at one point or another) to keep using the semi-backed, still alpha, HC release to avoid the overhead of the switch (especially given the rate of advances made in the HC port and bricking risk involved in jumping back and forth). Now all the current ROM developers (in clear contradiction to what XDA advocated) will need to either release 1.2 compatible ROMs or risk loss of interest.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
TJEvans said:
I originally thought that they didn't want to do this becuase they will then have wasted all that time on the 1.1 Roms that are still in development...but then something dawned on me. Roebeet was able to port 3 existing Roms, all that he worked on, to 1.2. One based on TNT lite, one based on Gadam, and one (and probably best Rom I've ever used) based on Vegan. Keep in mind, he had all 3 of these up and running in about 2 days. He's actually been working on all of those, the HC port, and general 1.2 tools all at the same time. He's created direct and simple processes to flash to 1.2, a revised CWM for it, has Pershoot and Clemsyn on board with kernels.
Call me a fanboi, etc...but the man has really put in some major time on the 1.2 projects.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The whole 1.1/1.2 bootloader thing is stupid and melodramatic. There is little difference, and no real reason to use one vs the other. As builds from Malata get released, this will likely be a non-issue. sooner or later a 'standard' will emerge. Time takes care of this.
As for this 'overhead' between switching, its a fairly simple process to nvFlash. I think we forget that this is an enthusiasts and developers site. There are plenty of threads/articles explaining how to do it. This ain't Viewsonic Tech support. If you can't read these threads and learn how to do this, you really shouldn't be toying with the firmware to start with.
Zaphod-Beeblebrox said:
The whole 1.1/1.2 bootloader thing is stupid and melodramatic. There is little difference, and no real reason to use one vs the other. As builds from Malata get released, this will likely be a non-issue. sooner or later a 'standard' will emerge. Time takes care of this.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
At the moment there is a few good reasons to use 1.2. The main one is HoneyComb . But it has been found that the 1.2 for the Adam is interchangeable with our 1.2. The adam developers have said they are working on a gingerbread release which means that 1.2 will be the way to get acceleration on a gingerbread rom.
Sure at the moment, if you don't feel like playing around with Honeycomb which is only partially working (I can't believe how much progress has been made in the last 2 days), there is no real reason to switch today. But, it looks like the best of what will come out in the near future is on 1.2 which can only be found on a different web site currently.

Recognize skill

Faux123 is a developer why xda cannot recognize this beyond comprehension.
One of best devs for this phone
Sent from my LG-P999 using XDA Premium App
yea I would like to suck him off
c19932 said:
yea I would like to suck him off
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i only donated money
c19932 said:
yea I would like to suck him off
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
WTF!!! I just donate!!
Suprah..."no cyanogen, rom manager still fake flashes the roms thats y for nvidia phones we have to use nvflash"
I am new to this whole scene, but gotta say that the Faux rom is tits....whatever happened, I hope it gets fixed soon.
I agree totally. Faux has personally helped me numerous times and his Kernel, Rom and overall knowledge of the G2X and android platform as a whole pushes him out the din and into the realm of Developer IMO. If he doesn't meet the requirements of being a Dev then very few of the supposed "devs" on here do, yet they still get the recognition. Even after his title was removed he's still working hard on his projects and still helping people.
I don't know what happened or why but it's wrong, Faux was wronged and I think a bit less of XDA for it. I'm sure I'm not the first or last to say this so whatever, just my 2 cents that wasn't asked for.
Seriously, what's up with this?
Any admins or mods care to chime in here with the reasoning behind this? This kind of stuff drives devs away, which you can already see happening.
Members go where devs go, come on xda!
I agree Faux is a very dedicated developer who has helped the community a lot and we should drum up support for him to be Recognized.
my thing is that faux is putting out kernels and roms for more than just this phone and the mods and admin guys and girl cannot recognize him shame on them.
yea he is a super nice guy idk what he could of done for that to happen hes to nice lol, faux is one of the best developers hands down, and yea i said it
I agree. Even though I'm new here, it didn't take me long to realize that Faux is one of the most, if not THE most valued developer for this phone. Most other rom developers include his kernals in their roms that they stamp their own names to...if that's not an endorsement, I don't know what is.
There is always two sides to a story. With that being said, im on his titles side.WE dont know what Faux may or my not have done but if the issue is out side of his work it shouldnt effect the title. Admited I maybe the newest guy on here but without Faux's work my G2x wouldn't.
Originally Posted by faux123
Quick Announcement:
CyanogenMod Team has added Apache License 2.0 to many of their files which I have borrowed and modified for my Nexus ROM, so they have kindly asked those who used their code to display their license notices.
I have modified and incorporated their updates to Settings.apk to display all the CyanogenMod licenses in order to comply and give credit to CyanogenMod team's effort and contribution.
Here's a screenshot of the updates.. This is still work in progress (for version 1.2.7 and beyond), once CyanogenMod has completed their license updates to their own releases, my ROM will also display all the appropriate licenses.
BTW, I am taking a break from android for a while, I am going to pick up my guitar lesson again. Android has taken up quite a bit of my free time and I want to get back to my practice (I really suck at playing guitar, but I still want to learn it).
So did CM feel as though Faux wasn't giving credit for their work???? I remember from day one that he always gave credit to CM for all the work that they put in.... I also remember he was forced to change the name of his rom because they were unhappy about it... Seems like they were angry that he was possibly using some of their framework, and were jealous that his rom was receiving way more attention then theirs, leading for them to complain about how he was not giving them the proper credit for work which is why he now has to incorporate these apache license things... Who knows that's just my opinion and if it is the case its BS because like I said before he always gave credit in his threads to the work CM team did... Hopefully Faux gets bored of playing the guitar and playing street fighter and comes back because GOD knows he is needed and wanted here and not just for the G2X but for the android community.
It looks like this under investigation by the mods at this moment and has been for the past few days. Not much more info than that was mentioned since it's between Faux and XDA.
Hopefully this gets settled quickly.
I hope it gets rectified quickly because Faux is the man!!!
Whats the point of this thread? Where is it that it was claimed that he was not a developer? Is it because of the apache licensing that you are all upset?
The only concern that I would have is how the updates are represented from version to version. Looking at the latest release, other than the kernel, none of the changes seem to be any different than that of nightly CM7 but are represented as different or as if written by him. I don't think its intentional and probably just needs to be clarified.
Seriously though, why you all got your panties in a bunch?
Either way, good luck faux... we look forward to seeing you back in the future...
Sent from my butt using XDA Premium App

it appears there is no privacy

I hope I'm not reposting, but it felt so important to share this
http://www.zdnet.com/blog/apple/htc-rootkit-discovered-phoning-home-with-user-data/11792
T-mobile has confirmed that this software ships with the 4G slide:
http://support.t-mobile.com/thread/12505?tstart=0&noredirect=true
Please go complain about this on that thread or directly to t-mobile, even if you're rooted and running a custom ROM. It's something that shouldn't be foisted on the 99% of normobs out there, and if people speak out about this it can only increase the chances of t-mobile doing something about it.
Removed all that crap already. This has been going on for awhile.. power to the user
sent from my RuBiX infused MT4G Slide using xda premium
Undead posted a patch, and supossedly the App that started all of it is Zipline...Doubleshot. Something within those lines.
DoubleshotNomy :3 [CM7.1] [2.3.7]
Litesorrows said:
Undead posted a patch, and supossedly the App that started all of it is Zipline...Doubleshot. Something within those lines.
DoubleshotNomy :3 [CM7.1] [2.3.7]
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can you post a link to the patch?
I don't know about a patch, but i found this utility that checks if you have ciq
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=17612559
I checked my phone with the detection tool and it's not on there. Anyone found it?
Don't worry. T-Mobile did not put cip our phone... Only SWM-C lol
Sent from my DoubleShot Lite
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1286840
That's the link to the security patch put together by Undeadk9. It's over in Dev.
When these issues were first released, we all handled it immediately and he made a patch to make it easier to do it.
If you haven't flashed it or are on a ROM that hasn't dealt with these issues, look into it.
The link to the androidpolice article is in Undeadk9's thread.
(yes, things like this are why the app Pulse is one of my top 'need to have' apps. Breaking news - my way, about what's important to me.)
Blue6IX said:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1286840
That's the link to the security patch put together by Undeadk9. It's over in Dev.
When these issues were first released, we all handled it immediately and he made a patch to make it easier to do it.
If you haven't flashed it or are on a ROM that hasn't dealt with these issues, look into it.
The link to the androidpolice article is in Undeadk9's thread.
(yes, things like this are why the app Pulse is one of my top 'need to have' apps. Breaking news - my way, about what's important to me.)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh.
That patch doesn't address this issue, that was another security hole.
Doing everything to address this... Another question by my father.... How does this impact exchange email, regardless of device, platform, or carrier? Does anyone know?
kronickhigh said:
Doing everything to address this... Another question by my father.... How does this impact exchange email, regardless of device, platform, or carrier? Does anyone know?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The answer, unfortunately, is "that depends".
Keystrokes *are* being caught and logged, that's clear. It doesn't appear that they're being permanently stored or transmitted, but that doesn't matter. Malicious software could potentially read those keystrokes and do whatever with them.
All of the RubiX_CubeD roms will be patched up and rid of any of this doggy doo doo by this Sunday.
RubiX_CubeD NoSense v3.0 INCLUDES fix to remove all tracking garbage everyone's been hearing about.
I assume cm7 would be safe since it's built from scratch.
Sent from my Sensation using xda premium
jsyi84 said:
All of the RubiX_CubeD roms will be patched up and rid of any of this doggy doo doo by this Sunday.
RubiX_CubeD NoSense v3.0 INCLUDES fix to remove all tracking garbage everyone's been hearing about.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You'll need to remove the SWM-C stuff.
That's the redbend sofware managemet client, which T-Mobile includes. That software gives T-Mobile the ability to install, remove, or modify any software installed on your phone without your knowledge or permission.
EDIT: Actually, it'd be great if ROMs could be titled with [NOSWM], so we'd know. Just a thought.
The Rubix Cubed ROMs have all been "fixed" now to prevent this invasion of privacy. Since we aren't allowed to post about other forums on here all I can say is to Google RubiX CubeD ROM and you'll see your 3 options.
**mods i.e. arrrghhh**
As you can see I haven't posted any direct links or referenced any other particular forums to acquire these said roms so I am not violating what you referred to as "uncredited" work and a "d!ck" move as quoted from your PM to me this morning below .....Google is everyone's friend and it's pretty common knowledge anything can be found on there!
arrrghhh said:
Especially with a link to xxxxxx, basically telling XDA users to not visit XDA. That was a real **** move - I do not want to see you doing this again.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So, I'm guessing if we freeze the SWM-C stuff, we should be safe? Is there anything else that's questionable and should be frozen?
I'm no expert. I have a rooted but stock MT4GS. I downloaded an app from the marketplace that is supposed to find if you have the software on your phone.
According to the software, I don't have the "infection".
I searched the marketplace for "carrier iq" and found a few detectors. I used one from Lookout, the people that make remote lock and wipe software. I also downloaded one from Bitdefender and got the same negative answer.
TMO News had a post with a list of offending phones and ours was not on there.
My guess is that it is not on our phones.
Our phone doesn't come with carrier iq thankfully. TrevE has an app that checks and removes it.
We do however have swm-c and htc loggers. Both can be removed. I know undeads roms have both removed.
I checked for both already.
sent from my RuBiX infused MT4G Slide using xda premium

MIUI for Droid Charge

I am not a developer, I am just a normal phone geek that enjoyed MIUI, and found this following site with a MIUI build.
MOD Edit: Link Removed due to registration, and general shadiness.
I know that MIUI is old news for some of you, and dislike the ROM, however for those, such as my self, that are MIUI fans I found a beta build of MIUI for the charge in another web site "z4cellforum" by Cjen. Since XDA is usually the best place for ROMs, I thought I'd share this links with you guys.
Nice link. Can't even view anything before signing up. And not everyone uses facebook! /rant
I don't care enough to log in and look, but there was a guy that popped up here and on Rootz a week or two ago claiming to have a MIUI build which turned out to just be an EP1 GummyCharged build that was poorly modified and had a few MIUI app replacements. I didn't look at it myself, but others whom I respect reported it to be a total hack job.
Anyone know if this is the same build?
shrike1978 said:
I don't care enough to log in and look, but there was a guy that popped up here and on Rootz a week or two ago claiming to have a MIUI build which turned out to just be an EP1 GummyCharged build that was poorly modified and had a few MIUI app replacements. I didn't look at it myself, but others whom I respect reported it to be a total hack job.
Anyone know if this is the same build?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Same link from here
Closing due to registration, and general shadiness. Also getting this out of Development forum.

Mecha Centre- for everything HTC Thunderbolt

This is already over at RootzWiki, but I thought I'd spread the news to XDA too!
Hey all,
So I've been working on a site (which went live earlier today) to serve as a repository for ROMs, kernels, recoveries, things like that, and even news- Mecha Centre.
I've noticed that the Thunderbolt community is dying a bit, not only because of the age of the Thunderbolt, but because of the whole RIL Ice Cream Sandwich fiasco which suggests that Thunderbolt development is dead without HTC's releasing updates.
I've created this site to help revive/keep the community of devs and users alive, as well as to make it easier to locate ROMs and other files one may need for their Thunderbolt.
We're still working on the site, but we already have some live links and news, and I encourage everyone to check it out! We try to keep ROM files so as to avert the dreaded 404 dead link, and our goal is to update often and keep up with the developers and their ROM releases.
You can find out more about this project at Mecha Centre and contact us with any questions, comments, suggestions, etc. via [email protected]
Thanks guys! Long live Thunderbolt!
Nice to see someone wants to continue but there are quite a few of these small starter sites now, i remember a few months ago when someone brought out their own as well, don't know what happened to it.. but I'm all for having a "good" rom mirror for all the old roms that seems to have no working links now.
Sent from my ADR6400L using Tapatalk 2
I didn't know this has been done before... Well Mecha Centre isn't going anywhere, especially since the site is free to host, I plan on keeping this repository available so long as people actually have Thunderbolts and use the site once in a while.
Thanks for the comment!
Well, I haven't been on in a few days, but I know there are a lot of ROMs still missing from Mecha Centre, I've flashed several ROMs over the past few days to help sort of distinguish one ROM from the other and help out newbies with ROM selection. With that in mind, I also plan to add screenshots, the way it looks now, I'm seeing one page per ROM to really get in the details.
I am also considering toning down the Ads a lot, not a little, a lot; I've made less than a quarter with it in the past few days, I don't see it paying the site's bills for the future. I've added a Donate button, which may or may not work at the present, it's being weird, at least for my test page...
As much as I'd like to add as many ROMs to Mecha Centre as possible- that's kind of the point of the site- many ROMs are virtually identical, I cannot tell you how many ROMs are a devs interpretation of the perfect Sense ROM or the perfect AOSP ROM. So while I plan on getting as many ROMs as possible up, I give priority to the "popular" ones, CM7, Liquid ICS, MIUI, etc.
Anyway good night all!
Your site needs some gingeritis 3D in its life
Sent from my ADR6400L using xda app-developers app
Noted, I'll add it with the rest I was planning to add today/tomorrow.
Moved site to MechaCentre.tk
Not to revive this thread, but is this something a mod can/should make a sticky?
jimmyco2008 said:
Not to revive this thread, but is this something a mod can/should make a sticky?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
just posting this in your thread doesn't necessarily mean that a mod or staff member will see it, this site is large. it would be better to contact a mod directly and ask about it.
quickdraw86 said:
just posting this in your thread doesn't necessarily mean that a mod or staff member will see it, this site is large. it would be better to contact a mod directly and ask about it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for the tip!
Great site Thanks
Great Site definitely long overdue for someone to do this
Sent from my Liquid ICS Thunderbolt

Categories

Resources