http://androidandme.com/2010/10/news/nexus-two-rumors-return-is-this-the-samsung-gingerbread-phone/
http://www.cityam.com/news-and-analysis/google-and-carphone-mobile-deal
Trying to figure out why this is posted here?
s15274n said:
Trying to figure out why this is posted here?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
let me give you a hint.......lot of people switched from Nexus 1 to Vibrant......Vibrant made by Samsung.....and both phones are Android
They better get rid of/improve RFS before declaring it a 'huge success'.
kolyan said:
let me give you a hint.......lot of people switched from Nexus 1 to Vibrant......Vibrant made by Samsung.....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But this still has NOTHING to do with the vibrant.
A lot of people switched from the iPhone to the Vibrant, but does that mean we post everything about the iPhone here? NO.
Master™ said:
But this still has NOTHING to do with the vibrant.
A lot of people switched from the iPhone to the Vibrant, but does that mean we post everything about the iPhone here? NO.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
please stop trying to act like a mod, this IS a GENERAL section and most people with vibrants only check the vibrant forum... Let a real mod decide if it belongs or not.
That being said i doubt Samsung would release a Nexus series phone. Those are supposed to be like developer phones where it is very easy to root, unlock the bootloader, etc.
Also I don't think google would want an RFS system on a "google" phone.
jz9833 said:
please stop trying to act like a mod, this IS a GENERAL section and most people with vibrants only check the vibrant forum... Let a real mod decide if it belongs or not.
That being said i doubt Samsung would release a Nexus series phone. Those are supposed to be like developer phones where it is very easy to root, unlock the bootloader, etc.
Also I don't think good would want an RFS system on a "google" phone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Please stop trying to act like a mod, let a real mod decide what people can tell other people.
This is a general section for things concerning the vibrant, not general as in go wild with random things.
Master™ said:
But this still has NOTHING to do with the vibrant.
A lot of people switched from the iPhone to the Vibrant, but does that mean we post everything about the iPhone here? NO.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Let me give you another hint......
Samsung is releasing Galaxy S2 (or Vibrant2) which might end up beeing the so called "Nexus 2"
So I would strongly advice reading or searching before posting...... don't u have this in your signature ?
jz9833 said:
please stop trying to act like a mod, this IS a GENERAL section and most people with vibrants only check the vibrant forum... Let a real mod decide if it belongs or not.
That being said i doubt Samsung would release a Nexus series phone. Those are supposed to be like developer phones where it is very easy to root, unlock the bootloader, etc.
Also I don't think good would want an RFS system on a "google" phone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How the hell am I acting like a MOD?
I was saying this doesn't have anything to do with the vibrant.
Just because I know where stuff should go, and said this wasn't the right spot doesn't make me a wanna be MOD. However it makes you a.. nvm
^ not acting like a mod, more like a person who needs to learn to search before posting instead of posting useless posts......
kolyan said:
^ not acting like a mod, more like a person who needs to learn to search before posting instead of posting useless posts......
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Quit mixing your story. You called me a wanna be MOD, now your saying I need to search before posting?
How the hell do I need to search? Not my fault that YOU posted something about a diff phone here, get over it & move on. Quit blaming me
Master™ said:
Quit mixing your story. You called me a wanna be MOD, now your saying I need to search before posting?
How the hell do I need to search? Not my fault that YOU posted something about a diff phone here, get over it & move on. Quit blaming me
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
are you seriously...well not that smart or just blind ? where did I call you a MOD ? And how is Galaxy S2 not related to Galaxy S (aka Vibrant) ?
That signature is really not working for you.......
kolyan said:
are you seriously...well not that smart or just blind ? where did I call you a MOD ? And how is Galaxy S2 not related to Galaxy S (aka Vibrant) ?
That signature is really not working for you.......
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ehh, sorry that was JZ whatever who said that.
But the Galaxy S, isnt only the Vibrant. It includes the fascinate, I9000, etc.
So it isnt directly related to the Vibrant, it is a whole diff phone.
If this does turn out to be true.. could it mean that gingerbread would at least be somewhat optimisted for samsung's processors?
Master™ said:
Ehh, sorry that was JZ whatever who said that.
But the Galaxy S, isnt only the Vibrant. It includes the fascinate, I9000, etc.
So it isnt directly related to the Vibrant, it is a whole diff phone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I dont know about you man, but my phone has a big Galaxy S logo on the back
kolyan said:
I dont know about you man, but my phone has a big Galaxy S logo on the back
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
*FacePalm*
Yes, it is a Galaxy S model. But so are the other phones (Fascinate, I9000, etc)
You are talking about Nexus 2, not the Vibrant.
So it should of gone here: http://forum.xda-developers.com/forumdisplay.php?f=256
dezshiz said:
If this does turn out to be true.. could it mean that gingerbread would at least be somewhat optimisted for samsung's processors?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well.....it is just a rumor. ps. the rumor is based on the fact that S2 is getting released around the time Gingerbread is and S2 is supposed to be the first Gingerbread phone.....if S2 is the first to run Gingerbread, it must be the next "Nexus" i guess.
Master™ said:
*FacePalm*
Yes, it is a Galaxy S model. But so are the other phones (Fascinate, I9000, etc)
You are talking about Nexus 2, not the Vibrant.
So it should of gone here: http://forum.xda-developers.com/forumdisplay.php?f=256
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol, its obvious that when/if a galaxy s2 is released, the vibrant section will be renamed, thays why iys being posted here. Just like the captivate, epic facinate and so on are all mixed in the same section, all the same phone.
Haha jz, you are funny
Master™ said:
How the hell am I acting like a MOD?
I was saying this doesn't have anything to do with the vibrant.
Just because I know where stuff should go, and said this wasn't the right spot doesn't make me a wanna be MOD. However it makes you a.. nvm
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
by posting you dont think it belong is an certain forum. if you really just felt that youd ignore the thread and let it die because no one replied, however, you had to add a post, giving this thread a bump, and more people saw it.
I know you are a developer for the vibrant and i respect you a lot for that. I honesty am really grateful for people like you who are willing to take their time to help everyone, however, I am frustrated by people posting in threads in this section like they are mods trying to regulate the forum.
If you look at most of the junk threads someone asks something they could of easily found, most of it is people flaming for OP which also happens to keep the thread alive. Don't people understand that if no one replies the thread dies? If you disagree with this thread, just let it die...
jz9833 said:
by posting you dont think it belong is an certain forum. if you really just felt that youd ignore the thread and let it die because no one replied, however, you had to add a post, giving this thread a bump, and more people saw it.
I know you are a developer for the vibrant and i respect you a lot for that. I honesty am really grateful for people like you who are willing to take their time to help everyone, however, I am frustrated by people posting in threads in this section like they are mods trying to regulate the forum.
If you look at most of the junk threads someone asks something they could of easily found, most of it is people flaming for OP which also happens to keep the thread alive. Don't people understand that if no one replies the thread dies? If you disagree with this thread, just let it die...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just because I said "This is the wrong section" doesn't mean I was acting like a MOD.
I was simply stating that it was posted in the wrong section, so hopefully the OP will not make the same mistake next time.
Also, I didn't "Flame" the OP. Someone started coming at me. Just FYI
Related
Ok, well I have completely jacked up my phone from where I updated using Odin..I flashed my phone through a vibrant rom or whatever and now it was in t-mobile, then I flashed it through a fasinate rom or whatever and now its in version. I am looking for the original Samsung Galaxy S Showcase rom or whatever I need to get my phone back to CS and to its orginal state. Can somebody help me?
Check your PM
And don't EVER flash ROMs for other phones.
Seriously? What is it about showcase users that they think they can flash whatever the hell they want and there won't be problems?
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
I've never understood that either. Why anyone thinks they can flash ROMs for other phones is beyond me.
add144 said:
I've never understood that either. Why anyone thinks they can flash ROMs for other phones is beyond me.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
lol. sorry for the spam, but I need to get my post count up to post on dev forums.
richaoj said:
lol. sorry for the spam, but I need to get my post count up to post on dev forums.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Please don't do that as it's very annoying. Just ask or post whatever you need to in the general forum. Same people that post in the Dev thread read and post here.
akellar said:
Please don't do that as it's very annoying. Just ask or post whatever you need to in the general forum. Same people that post in the Dev thread read and post here.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am not posting random ****, I thought the post was funny, so I responded as such. I shouldn't have mentioned the part about the spam but whatever.
And in response to the comment about why people install ROM's for other phones, yea it's not necessarily smart to do so, but for the most part these forums are not exactly noobie friendly . . .
I am not new to the world of linux, I have been a user of various distros on my personal machines and work servers since 2006. I am coming from the world of webOS, where I did a little development in my sparse spare time, webOS had a lot of promise, but did not have the community nor the rapid pace of development that android has, so I finally switched.
I have found that, through no intentional fault of the community members here, entry into the world of Android homebrew has been somewhat intimidating, mainly because of the terminology that you all use. I have looked, but still don't know what many of the acronyms stand for. It has a high "entry cost," which it probably should otherwise you would have every joe schmoe trying to flash their phones with various experimental roms. (well apparently they do that anyway) But perhaps a glossary of terms could be helpful somewhere for those of us that got to the party late but could still be of some help once we catch up).
And to the guy who started this thread: don't do something until you have read about it sufficiently enough to be sure that it will work. Going backwards is often alot more difficult than spending the time to do it right in the first place. I have learned this lesson the difficult way a number of times (I am not the most prudent person with stuff, i like to shoot from the hip and have shot myself in the foot a number of times)
So a glossary similar to this which is stickied in this thread?
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1041890
akellar said:
So a glossary similar to this which is stickied in this thread?
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1041890
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yea, I'm a retard . . . just found it. I was going to edit the post before hoepefully anyone saw it . . .
doh
richaoj said:
sorry for the spam
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
richaoj said:
I am not posting random ****
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm pretty sure if you're admitting its "spam" from the get go, that counts as random ****.
Just saying.
Originally Posted by richaoj
but for the most part these forums are not exactly noobie friendly . . .
.. don't do something until you have read about it sufficiently enough to be sure that it will work. Going backwards is often alot more difficult than spending the time to do it right in the first place.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I kind of like the fact that these forums are not dumb down it makes the learning curve steeper but I learn more that way not just the hows but also the whys. I spent two months reading this and other forums before I flashed my first ROM. I find the things I work the hardest for I learn the best and all the information is here sometimes you just have to dig for it. IMHO like
That's the spirit! Look at you! Nub of the year!
I was the same way honestly. I was very hesitant before ever doing anything to my phone first time around.
Haha its a first with android! I am more along the lines of coding firmware for PSN and jtagging xbox 360 consoles! I am a nub at this haha
I am in the same boat
I did the same thing to my showcase with the exception that I downloaded (from a different forum) learned my lesson, a odin file that was listed for cellular south showcase and when I flashed it it turned out to be for a Tmobile vibrant and now I only get errors when the modem bin tries to load in oden. Kinda hosed at this point!
Any Ideas on this would me much appreciated!!!
You could've done permanent damage to your phone that is irreversible chief.
add144 said:
You could've done permanent damage to your phone that is irreversible chief.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
gotta love the stupid tax. The file was titled correctly just did not turn out to be what it stated. Oh well thanks anyway!
I am trying to find the gingerbread rom for my husbands Galaxy S. Kind of new at this and will need directions if anyone can lead me in the right direction i'd be very greatful. Thanks in advance.
On a side note, 2.3 is Gingerbread. If you browse the Galaxy S forums, you would be able to find what you need. I went ahead and found the stock one for you.
Just a word of advise, if you are new to installing roms, I would recommend finding someone that knows what they are doing, or you could risk bricking his phone.
thanks although the links didn't show up he wants to be able to watch netflix on his phone of course if there is an easier way to allow him to do that i would be much happier with that. Im just not sure how to go about it i do understand that bricking is possible but i dont' have anyone to do it but me so i kind of stuck
abie09 said:
thanks although the links didn't show up he wants to be able to watch netflix on his phone of course if there is an easier way to allow him to do that i would be much happier with that. Im just not sure how to go about it i do understand that bricking is possible but i dont' have anyone to do it but me so i kind of stuck
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Currently the only way to watch netflix on the gs4g is with Gingerbread 2.3.3.
There is a odin flashable rom here: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1146145
Before flashing I would read this: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1001759
It is not that difficult just make sure to read through the forum and use the search button.
Remember however at this time gingerbread is a leaked build, so it may have some bugs. Future releases will likely fix this but may take some time.
THANKS
Thank you so much for all the info i did flash our HD2's to android but mine is having some issues now and i went to the GS but the screen was to small for me being as i'm almost blind in a sense but i will try this and see if this is what he wants or wants to go back to HD2. Again thanks so much.
you have absolutely no clue what your'e talking about. Please take 1 minute to research next time, and you'll realize there are 2 gingerbread versions on this site.
the fact tha you don't e ven know that 2.3 is gingerbread means you shouldn't even be posting yet
She asked a question. Yes, she could have researched, but you don't have to be so rude about it; especially when corradokng addressed her issue as well as telling her to search next time.
Abie, let us know how it goes. I hope you guys get it working. Check out the netflix threads in the themes section
Sent from my SGH-T959V using XDA Premium App
bustanut said:
you have absolutely no clue what your'e talking about. Please take 1 minute to research next time, and you'll realize there are 2 gingerbread versions on this site.
the fact tha you don't e ven know that 2.3 is gingerbread means you shouldn't even be posting yet
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ummm really dude that was kinda rude... i call stuff by the wrong crap all the time lol diodexed lol sorry had to make fun of my self there for a second..... does that mean i should not be posting sorry not starting anything just cause she put a .2 instead of 2.3 it could be a mistype.
bustanut said:
you have absolutely no clue what your'e talking about. Please take 1 minute to research next time, and you'll realize there are 2 gingerbread versions on this site.
the fact tha you don't e ven know that 2.3 is gingerbread means you shouldn't even be posting yet
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And people wonder why xda gets a bad rap, Question asked info given even a friendly search reminder and then you show up and act like a douche.
Sent from my SGH-T959V using Tapatalk
bustanut said:
you have absolutely no clue what your'e talking about. Please take 1 minute to research next time, and you'll realize there are 2 gingerbread versions on this site.
the fact tha you don't e ven know that 2.3 is gingerbread means you shouldn't even be posting yet
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Honestly, that's one of the most unnecessary posts I've seen in a while.
You're supposed to be kind to new users, not rude.
People like you are why Krylon left XDA.
Oh ok, I'm sorry that there's a section in this forum called Android Development, and that the OP didn't bother to even click on that.
One click, and this thread wouldn't even n eed to exist
bustanut said:
Oh ok, I'm sorry that there's a section in this forum called Android Development, and that the OP didn't bother to even click on that.
One click, and this thread wouldn't even n eed to exist
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Rude.
The point is that the new user didn't know it existed...just help 'em out!
Thanks for all the advice and help but we deceided to go back to our HD2's that are currently running HyperDroid and I did it all by myself. Again thanks for answering my questions and reminding me to research. You are great.
Sent from my HD2 using XDA App
I love how you sent that from your hd2. Lol.
Sent from my SGH-T959V using XDA Premium App
Yeah I thought it was fitting lol
Sent from my HD2 using XDA Premium App
Please, we need to start CM7. It is not hard at all for this phone, even the vibrant and captivate, which came on eclair have it. And the Galaxy s 2 even has it now. Also the year old Galaxy S 19000 has it. We need to do so.
Hasn't this been discussed several times in the past two weeks? I am pretty sure it has been! It is in the works.
If it is so easy to do then why havent i seen your cm7 rom posted here yet?
and next time dont post **** like this there are like 10 of these damn threads on here.
the devs here are hard at work giving people great roms....so all these *****ing and moaning threads need to stop....if it was so f***n easy people then everyone on here would be posting roms
airfluip1 said:
Please, we need to start CM7. It is not hard at all for this phone, even the vibrant and captivate, which came on eclair have it. And the Galaxy s 2 even has it now. Also the year old Galaxy S 19000 has it. We need to do so.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Airfluip, I hope you're trolling.
Ohhh boy are you gonna get flamed for this.
It's not as easy as you think. Vibrant and the SGS4G are very different in many aspects.
Plus you have to consider the dev ratio from here and the Vibrant Forums. There's only like 3 devs on the SGS4G and only one working on CM7. So it wouldn't be fair to compare it to the Vibrant.
Air its really hard cause its just krylon deving it. 1 person! Other phones have like more than a couple. So one person had to make a whole new kernel new mods modems and tweaks. Just really hard. Plus you need to make sure its encoded for cwm flashablw
Sent from my SGH-T959V using XDA App
I know you make some good posts here, but you seriously sound like someone that thinks they're entitled to these things.
There's some things to consider about getting CM7. One thing is that krylon360 is building this from scratch. All the developers on this forum have mentioned that the SGS4G is very much different from the Vibrant. Another is the popularity of this device. The I9000 and Vibrant have CM7, because they're older and more people have them. Not much people wanted to make the jump to the SGS4G. Although the SGSII is newer, it had so much more popularity than the SGS4G because of its power.
So, all in all, not as easy as you think.
OK, I didn't mean to offend anyone.
A. Somebody rudely accused me and stated that why I didn't make it myself if it is so easy. Answer, because i don't have time as I am a Freshman in High School
B. I didn't even know that krylon was working on one, and I would happily help him when I have free time.
You have to understand that everyone is feeling anxious to use CM7. It has been a while since GB was launched and our phone has been here since Feb.
airfluip1 said:
OK, I didn't mean to offend anyone.
A. Somebody rudely accused me and stated that why I didn't make it myself if it is so easy. Answer, because i don't have time as I am a Freshman in High School
B. I didn't even know that krylon was working on one, and I would happily help him when I have free time.
You have to understand that everyone is feeling anxious to use CM7. It has been a while since GB was launched and our phone has been here since Feb.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes everyone wants it but not everyone keeps asking where it is and when will it be done. Keep in mind that the sgs4g has about 3 dedicated devs. Dsexton who has his own line of roms Raver who has his own line of roms and I think does not even own the phone and krylon who works in a lot if different projects is building cm7 from scratch and just got the phone. It will come just have patience.
Sent from my SGH-T959V using XDA Premium App
nope i pay my mom from time to time to test and give u all pics but i dont own the device.. i actually own 0 devices atm lol some days i do get to use the phone if they need to get in cotact with me so .....
come on, guy.. You already knew it was being worked on. You posted almost the exact same question less than 2 weeks ago:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1206406&highlight=CM7
There is no need to make an entirely new thread asking the same question, especially when there are threads about the actual development of CM7 that you could easily be following. You should probably subscribe the the 2-3 CM7 threads on this forum, to keep yourself up to date.
airfluip1 said:
Please, we need to start CM7. It is not hard at all for this phone, even the vibrant and captivate, which came on eclair have it. And the Galaxy s 2 even has it now. Also the year old Galaxy S 19000 has it. We need to do so.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Your sig says CM7 is one of your projects and now you're saying "we need to start." So what does your signature about CM7 actually mean?
It means gtfo and leave me alone i wanna do a high quality rom but you little bastards keep anoying me. (DOT)
Sent from my SGH-T959V using XDA App
Means, that I got CM7 frameworks and apps to boot up, but it was useless. LOL, so I gave up and I forgot to take it off of my signature.
What happened to the rules, that no one will verbally abuse people.
You guys need to think before you post. Just because you are a dev, doesn't mean you can yell at others. I am also DEVing for the phone, and you guys don't respect anyone here.
airfluip1 said:
You guys need to think before you post. Just because you are a dev, doesn't mean you can yell at others. I am also DEVing for the phone, and you guys don't respect anyone here.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You should have used the search feature. To search for a thread you created for CM7. Not a person was being verbally abusive, they were simply stating that there are several threads created on the subject, and one of which was created by you. Put simply, dev or not, if a thread is created on a subject that already exists multiple times, I will point it out. That doesn't mean I don't respect the work you devs do for us.
jdubb1106 said:
If it is so easy to do then why havent i seen your cm7 rom posted here yet?
and next time dont post **** like this there are like 10 of these damn threads on here.
the devs here are hard at work giving people great roms....so all these *****ing and moaning threads need to stop....if it was so f***n easy people then everyone on here would be posting roms
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is pretty abusive considering that it is very easy to tell who it was directed to.
Point taken, and I do apologize! It is wrong to assume that none of us respect anyone, when there are clearly a majority of us DO respect and appreciate the time and effort you guys put into the phone.
IMO, this thread should just be closed to prevent further flaming.
*Walks into thread and starts knocking stuff over and breaking everything in sight while rambling something about using the search feature and other threads like this exist*
Hey there everyone.
I'm from the Vibrant section, and I have some questions for you Galaxy S 4G users, please do know I searched around, but I thought it'd be best to have all the information anyone had on this particular topic all in one thread, so if anyone feels this is useless, feel free to delete it, I'm just trying to gain some knowledge. My girlfriend has a GS4G, and although the devs have done a great job modding Samsung's ROMs.. they don't compare to AOSP ROMs in my opinion.
Now, for the questions.
1. Why is it we can't get a working kernel to boot for the GS4G? (Someone please do explain in detail.)
2. How far has someone gone/gotten? (I know krylon handed the work to someone, but I don't think they've reported back?)
And please, no stupid answers. This is pure discussion. If a kernel dev is what we need, I could try to find one that's willing to work with me, but we'd need testers and such.
From what I heard and read around, you guys don't have any devs thats capable of doing that.
Surfacet said:
From what I heard and read around, you guys don't have any devs thats capable of doing that.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol
Sent from my SGH-T959V using xda premium
Surfacet said:
From what I heard and read around, you guys don't have any devs thats capable of doing that.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Capable of doing what, exactly?
Surfacet said:
From what I heard and read around, you guys don't have any devs thats capable of doing that.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
sgs2 fourm that way bra <<<
He said sgs4G
Sent from my SGH-T959V using XDA App
theexel said:
Hey there everyone.
I'm from the Vibrant section, and I have some questions for you Galaxy S 4G users, please do know I searched around, but I thought it'd be best to have all the information anyone had on this particular topic all in one thread, so if anyone feels this is useless, feel free to delete it, I'm just trying to gain some knowledge. My girlfriend has a GS4G, and although the devs have done a great job modding Samsung's ROMs.. they don't compare to AOSP ROMs in my opinion.
Now, for the questions.
1. Why is it we can't get a working kernel to boot for the GS4G? (Someone please do explain in detail.)
2. How far has someone gone/gotten? (I know krylon handed the work to someone, but I don't think they've reported back?)
And please, no stupid answers. This is pure discussion. If a kernel dev is what we need, I could try to find one that's willing to work with me, but we'd need testers and such.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
We are already working on this now. Read through my kernel thread. I have specific milestones to getting cm7 on our phone. I will not skip steps to get to cm7 sooner, compromising stability and functionality. If you want to help, please pm me.
Sent from my SGH-T959V using xda premium
bhundven said:
We are already working on this now. Read through my kernel thread. I have specific milestones to getting cm7 on our phone. I will not skip steps to get to cm7 sooner, compromising stability and functionality. If you want to help, please pm me.
Sent from my SGH-T959V using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yep, just checked your replies on Rootz Wiki, sorry, I didn't notice that earlier.
But like I said, this thread isn't meant to rush anyone or say someone can't do something, simply for discussion and information. Thanks for taking the time to reply.
For real this thread again!? I'm going to kill myself. Can't bear it.
Wait... better idea! Lets flame the OP!
Surfacet said:
From what I heard and read around, you guys don't have any devs thats capable of doing that.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
haha bh will make you eat your words
chris31jct said:
For real this thread again!? I'm going to kill myself. Can't bear it.
Wait... better idea! Lets flame the OP!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Alright, flame me.. because I'm definitely doing something wrong. I'm in no way demanding an ETA or even demanding anyone to start working on this, I simply wanted to group the information anyone knows so we could help each other.. you know.. kind of what a community does?
Guys, being cynical and trolling won't get us anywhere, and tell you the truth, it's childish and starting to bore.
The guy said he wanted a technical status summary and specifically said he wants to help.
In this case, i think we do need to maintain a thread of work chords and specify the barriers.
I thank every new dev with a will to help.
I think he deserves a different attitude than a noob, especially if we don't want to scare all devs from here.
That's my opinion anyway.
Sent from me
Surfacet said:
From what I heard and read around, you guys don't have any devs thats capable of doing that.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
hahah XXDDD
Sorry I didn't respond sooner. I had life happen
I see the usual knee scuffs and bruises hit this thread too. I really wish people wouldn't post if doesn't help move the thread forward.
--
Anyways... back on topic... :clears throat:
theexel said:
Yep, just checked your replies on Rootz Wiki, sorry, I didn't notice that earlier.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's ok. I've responded to a few of these threads. It's surprising how many people don't click 'search' and search for 'cm7' or 'cyanogenmod'. I also don't expect people to read both rootz and xda. So if you read my op on the kernel thread, I have a "Plans" section (on both forums!).
theexel said:
But like I said, this thread isn't meant to rush anyone or say someone can't do something, simply for discussion and information. Thanks for taking the time to reply.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you want to help, pm me.
Starting threads like these without searching only causes trolling and thread thrash (a lot of useless threads in the forum that blur the current state).
When you read what I'm saying, imagine a skinny geek with a deep helpful-relaxed voice... and a smile
A lot of people take me the wrong way. I'm a geek. I read and write code. I don't like wasting my time making you feel all warm and fuzzy.
itzik2sh said:
Guys, being cynical and trolling won't get us anywhere, and tell you the truth, it's childish and starting to bore.
The guy said he wanted a technical status summary and specifically said he wants to help.
In this case, i think we do need to maintain a thread of work chords and specify the barriers.
I thank every new dev with a will to help.
I think he deserves a different attitude than a noob, especially if we don't want to scare all devs from here.
That's my opinion anyway.
Sent from me
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This.
10 Char.
Lets keep this thread going I am also wondering how come there is so little development here but what developers we have are dedicated!
We have great developers that work hard on cm. The sgs 4g is the problem of not having it, freaking sammy with their experiments. i really enjoy their masterpieces(devs). Op you just have to have some patience, cm will come to us i believe in our devs.
theexel said:
I simply wanted to group the information anyone knows so we could help each other.. you know.. kind of what a community does?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Then why didn't you group all the information that is already available in the 50 other threads about CM7 into this one?
if you really wanted to do that, you could have made your OP a summary with bullet points of the details of everything that was already discussed, and then updated it with new information that comes along.
did you even search at all??
mike-y said:
Then why didn't you group all the information that is already available in the 50 other threads about CM7 into this one?
if you really wanted to do that, you could have made your OP a summary with bullet points of the details of everything that was already discussed, and then updated it with new information that comes along.
did you even search at all??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Before flaming and insulting did you notice the date on the first post?
Personally I think the person that cast the raise dead spell should be getting beat with the flame bat.
I swear sometimes people are too eager to flame somebody. Its like they had a bad day come to xda to post behind a anonymous screen name and then walk away feeling better. But that is just me, Im sure my observation is wrong.
mike-y said:
Then why didn't you group all the information that is already available in the 50 other threads about CM7 into this one?
if you really wanted to do that, you could have made your OP a summary with bullet points of the details of everything that was already discussed, and then updated it with new information that comes along.
did you even search at all??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
First of all, this has never been my primary device. I have never owned this device. I used to own the Samsung Vibrant, now I own a Nexus S. My girlfriend owned a Galaxy S 4G, and was using her phone to try to bring something new to you guys. (First ICS theme for this device ring a bell?) It's not my job to group 50 other threads about CM7 into this one. That's not what a community is. I am in no way a recognized developer, I know my stuff, but I have a long way to go. But it's people like you that make devs want to leave and stop posting their stuff. You swear people have time to do everything. And indeed that was my intention, but I wasn't going to pull useless information from other threads that members have posted, that are often inaccurate. This thread was mostly meant for devs, that could actually help out, and working together.
In other news, I finally have some time to mess around with stuff, might look into more themes or something, but I lack a device to work on, so I guess if some people would like to help (testing, etc.) I'd be glad to push things out from time to time.
Hello guys,So im with three.uk they dont do LTE yet but they r about to roll it out very soon however they do DC-HSDPA and im in area where i should be getting it sadly im not getting it for some reason top of the screen shows only H+(mostly) sometimes H and 3G. If i go to connections->More Networks-> Mobile Networks -> Network mode i only get WCDMA/GSM(auto connect) or WCDMA only so this is what i get. I was reading that there is some problem with s4's shipped from korea and people advice to flash to unbranded stock well one was australian so i even flashed to australian firmware even to getman firmware so far no luck no lte in options not detecting DC-HSDPA just after flashing to getman/australian firmware i got an extra option in network mode and it is gsm only plus the other two i said before. So my question is how i could get this DC-HSDPA working and what indicator top of the screen will show instead of h+ will it show DC ? i was trying to find answers but no luck so far please help me outKind rengards Martin
I am sorry, but you are in the wrong forum...
Please allow me to redirect you to this forum.
K thank you
airfluip1 said:
I am sorry, but you are in the wrong forum...
Please allow me to redirect you to this forum.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
the linked forum.
the link IS in the previous post.
Funny how even after changing our forums name from "Samsung Galaxy S 4g" to "Samsung Galaxy S (4g model) people still come here thinking it's the s4
Should have renamed it SGH-959T/W
Well, and the actual forums themselves are still named S 4G. It's only the containing forum that's been renamed. It seems to have slowed the mess somewhat, but unfortunately we still have a moderate number of people who choose not to read.
getochkn said:
Should have renamed it SGH-959T/W
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wrong model
SGH-T959V/W
airfluip1 said:
SGH-T959V/W
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
mmm. I may suggest that the device forum to: Samsung Galaxy S 4G (SGH-T959V/T959W)
Saying T959 twice I think makes it a bit more clear.
If there is a rename, ALL the forums should be renamed... not just the header. I think that's where we're getting most of our current lazy bleedover now, from people who still see the S 4G rather than the S (4G Model) which is more clear.
Why not just add "NOT S4" to it as well.
Sent from my SGH-T959V using xda premium
Hey, Bryan is back! Yay. Thanks for dropping in.
johnadelic said:
Why not just add "NOT S4" to it as well.
Sent from my SGH-T959V using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Because then we'd need to add Not S, Not Epic 4G, Not Fascinate 4G, Not *every other phone model whose name we're somewhat near and whose lazy members can't be bothered to post in the right place* and that makes the forum name rather messy. Especially when reading on a tiny phone screen.
Theraze said:
Because then we'd need to add Not S, Not Epic 4G, Not Fascinate 4G, Not *every other phone model whose name we're somewhat near and whose lazy members can't be bothered to post in the right place* and that makes the forum name rather messy. Especially when reading on a tiny phone screen.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Then to make it easier let's add not non-galaxy-s-4g
we could just rename it to "Fah-Q Acid UserDebug 4G"
sent from within the white knight
Instead of doing that, why don't the monitors simply delete any thread that's about some other phone as soon as it's started? That way, the person will not get any answers and will just go away after awhile.
nazcalito said:
Instead of doing that, why don't the monitors simply delete any thread that's about some other phone as soon as it's started? That way, the person will not get any answers and will just go away after awhile.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That requires a moderator that is on hand all the time. Or people to report and not respond. And it apparent that is just not gonna happen either.
Best solution is report the post and people not feel the urge to tell the person that are a (insert insult).
nazcalito said:
Instead of doing that, why don't the monitors simply delete any thread that's about some other phone as soon as it's started? That way, the person will not get any answers and will just go away after awhile.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
also, that won't help the situation in the long term.... It will cause more confusion.
limeaide said:
That requires a moderator that is on hand all the time. Or people to report and not respond. And it apparent that is just not gonna happen either.
Best solution is report the post and people not feel the urge to tell the person that are a (insert insult).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The same thing is happening in the Galaxy 3 forum, which they had to rename to the Galaxy Apollo (Galaxy 3) forum. They are still developing roms for that little phone!
nazcalito said:
The same thing is happening in the Galaxy 3 forum, which they had to rename to the Galaxy Apollo (Galaxy 3) forum. They are still developing roms for that little phone!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How about we just let the threads die after kindly reminding the S4 users that this is not their phone. Instead of arguing about it and keeping the very thread that we don't want alive. One person guide the S4 user in the right direction and then leave the thread alone to die. How does that sound?