Database Info

[mods]delete thread

Mods delete

I am testing this now, praying the BFS scheduler finally gives me a lag free CM7 experience. Is the minmax governor a better performer than smartass?

I prefer x99's smartass, I think he just tweaked it recently on his github. I think minmax is a older govenor. I also get better battery life with the smartass
I just added minmax for testing purposes and to have more governor options

Thanks for the update will test over the weekend.
Sent from my PG06100 using XDA Premium App

Nice, well I tested it to the max for a whole day using gps navigation, wifi, 4g, pretty much everything lol. Data connection also seems better as well.

Soo far everything is working good. My wifi works perfect which I couldn't get to work with x99's kernel no matter how I tried flashing it including a full wipe.
What speed does this kernel boot at? Is there any way you can implement any of Scary's goodies into your kernel? I liked that his let's you do 184 min. Also any way to go higher than 1.5 ghz as I like using 1.8 at times. What is the sleep max on say ondemand etc. Anyway your gonna do undervolting?
Anyway thanks for the kernel and the hard work!
Sent From My Speedy Mc Speederson

Is this undervolted at all sparksco?

fifedogg said:
Soo far everything is working good. My wifi works perfect which I couldn't get to work with x99's kernel no matter how I tried flashing it including a full wipe.
What speed does this kernel boot at? Is there any way you can implement any of Scary's goodies into your kernel? I liked that his let's you do 184 min. Also any way to go higher than 1.5 ghz as I like using 1.8 at times. What is the sleep max on say ondemand etc. Anyway your gonna do undervolting?
Anyway thanks for the kernel and the hard work!
Sent From My Speedy Mc Speederson
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yes as soon as my team member get's back from vaction we'll be working on things like that. So the kernel can be worked on more
I basicly pushed this kernel out as soon as I had it working perfectly

After an hour or so of testing I have experienced no launcher or messenger app lag, whatever you did here its working for me.. I wonder if its the BFS? Do you know if bcnice aosp kernel used this too? His kernel is the only other like this that performed so well..

PaulB007 said:
After an hour or so of testing I have experienced no launcher or messenger app lag, whatever you did here its working for me.. I wonder if its the BFS? Do you know if bcnice aosp kernel used this too? His kernel is the only other like this that performed so well..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yes I do think it's bfs. I noticed how well the animations and graphics are so smooth. If I went back to none bfs I don't think I'd like it haha
Not sure about bcnice has it

Don't install this kernel version over the latest nightly, some things like wifi seem to not be working. I'll work on a updated version as I really want to stay up-to-date haha

Updated kernel but I have to remove bfs due to compatibility issues

Soo far everything is running great. I have no issues running 1.8ghz at all if I'm using ondemand governor.
How much did you undervolt? Meaning is it kinda like scary's or more like Bc's or X99's.
Thanks for making a great kernel. Everything works for me perfect.
1 request... Can you add 184mhz like Scary had? My phone saves lots of battery when I use it.

Awesome kernel!!!! Very smooth and I as well have no issues oc'ing to 1.8ghz... Great job man, keep it up!!!! Thank you!!!
Sent from my PG06100 using Tapatalk

fifedogg said:
Soo far everything is running great. I have no issues running 1.8ghz at all if I'm using ondemand governor.
How much did you undervolt? Meaning is it kinda like scary's or more like Bc's or X99's.
Thanks for making a great kernel. Everything works for me perfect.
1 request... Can you add 184mhz like Scary had? My phone saves lots of battery when I use it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks yes I will add the 184mhz for min. The uv is much like x99percents settings but I'll uv it more don't worry
Sent from my PG06100 using XDA Premium App

sparksco said:
Thanks yes I will add the 184mhz for min. The uv is much like x99percents settings but I'll uv it more don't worry
Sent from my PG06100 using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Your the man
Sent From My Speedy Mc Speederson

This is running well on on the latest shiftdeck rom. Fixed some minor video issues (lag) I was having with other kernels. Nice work!
<Blaze One>

This kernel is nice and fast on Shift Deck ROM but it seems to be a little rough on my battery. I've only been using it for about 4 hours, so maybe with some tweaking I can get it back up to par. Really enjoying the speed though.. Appreciate the great work.
Sent from my Gingerbread Speedy 4G using Tapatalk

Is their an update for Cyanogenmod 7 everyday? From what I see the numbers change everyday...and I download 37 zip Cyanogenmod and I don't really see a difference so I restored all my files.
Sent from my SGH-I897 using XDA Premium App

MzSantiago said:
Is their an update for Cyanogenmod 7 everyday? From what I see the numbers change everyday...and I download 37 zip Cyanogenmod and I don't really see a difference so I restored all my files.
Sent from my SGH-I897 using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Most of the changes in the nighties you are not going to notice a whole lot. The biggest changes are changes in the kernel. This kernel was built of the latest nightly kernel just a couple of days ago so it should be compatible with all the nightlies unless they mess with the kernel some more. But cyanogen just tweeted that we will have a rc soon So I'd just wait until then. Also I'm going to take a look at the stock ota update and see if I can hack the kernel and rom for us to intall without the latest hboot

SetCPU supports Tegra 2 (V2.2.0)

SetCPU master coolbho3000 has updated his app to include support for the Tegra 2. It's available at all the familiar places.
2.2.0 - Added an "In Call" profile. Improved the Set on Boot safemode function by including a flashable zip that toggles SetCPU's safemode. Press menu on the main tab for more details. Added autodetect support for all Tegra 2 fakeShmoo kernels (ie. G2x). Added a "Voltage" tab for undervolting the CPU on fakeShmoo kernels, some custom Galaxy S kernels, and some Nexus S kernels. This is a full-fledged interface for undervolting these devices, and includes backing up and restoring and a Set on Boot checkbox. Improved the way SetCPU initially requests root. Various miscellaneous bugfixes.

Undervolting in SetCPU, now that's fantastic. By far the best purchase I've made on the market.

GideonX said:
Undervolting in SetCPU, now that's fantastic. By far the best purchase I've made on the market.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Also has a cool feature that allows you to extract a zip file to your sdcard in case you've set it to 1.5/1.5 and your phone freaks out. You can just boot into recovery, flash the zip and it resets setcpu.

I must say, SetCPU 2.20 is quite amazing... worth every penny

Note to ppl who upgraded from existing setcpu...re-detect your cpu speeds from the main screen. Otherwise, voltage tab will force close on you.

What would you set "in-call" to?

mmapcpro said:
What would you set "in-call" to?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have 400/400 for screen off. I set in call to slightly higher at 400/500.
I'll need to test it tomorrow during calls and see if the screen wakes up quicker after a call ends.

For benching, I set it at 1500/1500 at 1300mV with no profile set for maximum power, and I'm getting much lower benchmarks in Smartbench 2011, than I was with pimpmycpu. Why do you think that would be?
pimpmycpu: 4400-4700
setcpu: 3700-4000

Wow very nice.

yes nice news ! Im happy to see old school

Great news. Just re-downloaded this and uninstalled pimp my cpu.
Sent from my LG-P999

Epiccccc. Bye bye pimp my CPU.
I love setcpu profiles
Sent from my LG-P999 using Tapatalk

I'm so pissed off by this. I legit bought cpu master at like noon on the 20th. Then I come home from work too setcpu being updated. dammit I want my two dollars back, I'm broke enough, and that could be bus money lol.
Sent from my LG-P999 using XDA Premium App

McFroger3 said:
I'm so pissed off by this. I legit bought cpu master at like noon on the 20th. Then I come home from work too setcpu being updated. dammit I want my two dollars back, I'm broke enough, and that could be bus money lol.
Sent from my LG-P999 using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
womp womp. Broke but have a G2x! legit! lol. theres nothing that can come inbetween a man and his phone and car lol!

I didn't pay anything for the phone lol.
Sent from my LG-P999 using XDA Premium App

New setcpu is working like a champ. OP, thanks for bringing this to our attention.
Sent from my LG-P999 using XDA Premium App

diablos991 said:
Great news. Just re-downloaded this and uninstalled pimp my cpu.
Sent from my LG-P999
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I did the same, but unfroze SETCPU and FROZE pimpmycpu.
In the transition, the battery got drained quite a bit over a few minutes, and heated up pretty fast when initially recharging. I had rebooted in between, but there may still have been some residual conflicts between the apps.
It froze at one point, but after a battery pull, it settled down. Overnight battery drain (with screen-off profile set pretty low) was only 4% over 8 hours. This is on EB 1.0.2 and faux stock kernel. Quadrent "only" around 4000, but everything works and this has apparently improved battery life.
A note on pimpmycpu - I thought scaling to min had stuck, but apparently not. Battery consumption was 12-15 % overnight compared to the above.

Thanks OP! I severely dislike pimpmycpu...
Sent from my LG-P999 using Tapatalk

So am I the only one that is getting significantly lower smartbench 2011 results with this updated setcpu as opposed to pimpmycpu?

mmapcpro said:
So am I the only one that is getting significantly lower smartbench 2011 results with this updated setcpu as opposed to pimpmycpu?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have not seen that, although compared to Quadrent, I had not seen the very high scores that some had. I doubt SETCPU would impact you OC'd performance at max setting (although pimp had scheduler settings and SETCPU does not).

SGX 540

I have a Droid X, a Droid Charge and my brother has an incredible 2. We both have chainfire installed and for some reason verysingle game plays many times smoother on the htc with the adreno 205 than on my charge with the sgx 540? any reason for that? even the games that are coded for tegra devices run on his so much smoother. i tried a game called falling fred, lags some on my charge, runs super smooth on the inc2, i have a galaxy tab 10.1 also runs super realy nice on that, and on my droid x it runs about the same as the charge. there is nothing wrong with my charge because ive played with 3 or 4 of them and they are all the same way. Any solutions?

Sound like you need some voodoo lagfix in your life lol... Are you running any custom roms or have custom kernals installed
Sent from my SCH-I510 using XDA Premium App

I agree with cold... Go for some lagfix
Charged up post!

i have voodoo lagfix courtesy of peanutbutta jelly time i really need a way to fix it

The SGX540 in these Samsung devices are underclocked severely. They are more capable but they can stand quite a bit of overclocking. Some devices come with the same gpu clocked at 385Mhz instead of 200Mhz.
The lag fix is ok but once we get a CM7 build it will look sloooooow. Been there done that.

jamesnmandy said:
The lag fix is ok but once we get a CM7 build it will look sloooooow. Been there done that.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Once we get an omgb/omfgb build, cm7 will look sloooow this phone seriously needs the mtd treatment tho
Sent from my froyo gummycharged charge w/imnuts otb kernel......bro.

sneakysolidbake said:
Once we get an omgb/omfgb build, cm7 will look sloooow this phone seriously needs the mtd treatment tho
Sent from my froyo gummycharged charge w/imnuts otb kernel......bro.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think I would rather see CM7 implementation if for no other reason than their dedication to constant updates. And they are all pretty much the same mtd based thing. OMGB shouldn't be any faster than CM7 and it lacks features.

Just my experience from the fascinate. Omgb and omfgb *seemed* smoother, not that cm7 was slow. And they pump out updates for their roms pretty regularly. If you don't think they're dedicated, then you don't know t3hh4xx0r.
Sent from my SCH-I510 using Tapatalk

I bailed on the Fascinate just as both CM and OMG came out so I missed out on all the fun....

piizzadude said:
I bailed on the Fascinate just as both CM and OMG came out so I missed out on all the fun....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And what fun it was. Glitch kernel allowed gpu overclocking. **** was intense. 1.6ghz cpu overclock and aggressive undervolting were commonplace due to the stability that mtd brought.
Sent from my SCH-I510 using Tapatalk

sneakysolidbake said:
Just my experience from the fascinate. Omgb and omfgb *seemed* smoother, not that cm7 was slow. And they pump out updates for their roms pretty regularly. If you don't think they're dedicated, then you don't know t3hh4xx0r.
Sent from my SCH-I510 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's not that I think they aren't dedicated, but the system in place for CM7 updates is far more structured and doesn't depend on one or two peoples' dedication.
piizzadude said:
I bailed on the Fascinate just as both CM and OMG came out so I missed out on all the fun....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I was able to run mtd a week or so, was absolutely amazing.
sneakysolidbake said:
And what fun it was. Glitch kernel allowed gpu overclocking. **** was intense. 1.6ghz cpu overclock and aggressive undervolting were commonplace due to the stability that mtd brought.
Sent from my SCH-I510 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, I could never overclock my Fascinate much before MTD. I was pulling 3000 quadrant scores at 1.4Ghz with a 233Mhz GPU clock speed i believe on the Glitch ML kernel and it actually run a good 8-10 hours that way to boot.

i refuse to have a phone that runs at less than its capabitlities. we need that gpu overclock! any devs can port it?

i refuse to have a phone that runs at less than its capabitlities. we need that gpu overclock! any devs can port it?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Then do something about it yourself. Glitch is an aosp kernel so porting isn't really an option until we have aosp roms to make use of it so that's quite a ways away. A gpu overclock may be possible on tw but I haven't ever heard of it being done and the devs capable of working on it probably have enough on their plate as it is. But who knows, maybe someone will pick it up I guess we'll see.
Sent from my SCH-I510 using Tapatalk

[Q] Have you managed to OC to 1460MHZ and keep stability?

I'm using AOSP+ ICS ROM with the latest Matr1x kernel. Whenever I try to OC to 1460 the phone freezes and I have to pull the battery, so I'm forced to run at a maximum of 1300MHz.
Also, on a related matter, is it good practice to use SetCPU with various profiles (battery<, temp>, screenoff, charging) for various frequencies? Or should I just use AOSP+ tweaks to chose a min and max frequency and let it be?
Thanks for taking the time to answer these.

Raise all voltages by +30 across the board
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA App

My Phone freezes when i try to OC to 1460

Read the above comment or read my FAQ...god..
Lol
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA App

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DPclc3eKgiQ&feature=youtube_gdata_player
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA App

zgomot said:
Also, on a related matter, is it good practice to use SetCPU with various profiles (battery<, temp>, screenoff, charging) for various frequencies? Or should I just use AOSP+ tweaks to chose a min and max frequency and let it be?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you are using deep idle you shouldn't underclock since it causes a race-to-idle condition. In other words your battery will drain faster. If you don't use deep idle, feel free to underclock when the screen is off or whatever you want.

sakisds said:
If you are using deep idle you shouldn't underclock since it causes a race-to-idle condition. In other words your battery will drain faster. If you don't use deep idle, feel free to underclock when the screen is off or whatever you want.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
To the point and verry helpful, thanks a bunch
mathkid95 said:
Raise all voltages by +30 across the board
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can I do this via AOSP+ tweaks and still use SetCpu to OC and UC? Are they conflicting apps? (Deep idle OFF)
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA App

I would recommend just using setcpu
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA App

mathkid95 said:
Raise all voltages by +30 across the board
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just an update, Using CNA 1.4.0 and Matr1x v17, I am stable oc'ed to 1460.
this is what I am running
1)800/1460
2)gov =Ondemand
3)Scheduler =Noop
4)all voltages to +30 (used the cna rom's voltage tweaker)
I tried ShadowGun: the Leftover.. and It was flying. Of course, make sure that have enough battery or that you have a charger ready. But finally it works, try this and let me know

I can run it for 10-20 min of usage then get a freeze. I never raised the voltages before though. It seems like its working for other people. And the actual developer of Matrix Kernel is telling you to ....
Nexus S (GSM i9020a)
AOKP (Build 25)
Eugene's Kernel (Speedy 7)
OC 800/100 (Lionheart)
Live OC (105)

It still amazes me how so many people that ask about overclocking have no frigging idea at all how cpus/gpus in general are binned etc.

I have a question. Why do you guys overclock that much? It might be snappy but battery life is just bad and it just doesn't worth it in my opinion.
Sent from my Nexus S from Tapatalk

albundy2010 said:
It still amazes me how so many people that ask about overclocking have no frigging idea at all how cpus/gpus in general are binned etc.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Care to shed some light for us people that have no frigging idea at all how cpus/gpus in general are binned etc? If not, well... why did you even bother posting?
ljordan2 said:
I have a question. Why do you guys overclock that much? It might be snappy but battery life is just bad and it just doesn't worth it in my opinion.
Sent from my Nexus S from Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Personally, I do it because I can. Seriously... I'm a geek, I love gadgets and tech and I like to tinker.
On the subject at hand, I'm still unable to OC to 1460 (ARM voltages +30, INT voltages +25) but at 1300 it runs fine, no issues whatsoever.

i can run 1460 stable all day. bigxie/matrix. just did +30 to all the voltages above 1000. deadline and lulzactive..

If you are a geek you would know about something as simple as binning chips. Do what a tech geek would do...look it up. Same thing the op should have done with his ?. Hell mathkid has a answer to his ? In the op of his kernel thread. Which is the kernel he is running

albundy2010 said:
If you are a geek you would know about something as simple as binning chips. Do what a tech geek would do...look it up. Same thing the op should have done with his ?. Hell mathkid has a answer to his ? In the op of his kernel thread. Which is the kernel he is running
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You're kinda bitter for someone married to a busty redhead

jesusice said:
You're kinda bitter for someone married to a busty redhead
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Haha, I thought so too.
Sent from my Nexus S

Set cpu

Whats the best scaling for set CPU. I am running MIKrunny rom.
Sent from my PG06100 using XDA

Well there are a lot of variables. Also, weather you want to lean towards performance, battery life. I'd say a good starting point is the default settings on MikRunny. 245mHz Min and 1.2gHz ( 1200mHz ) Max. Interactive and Ondemand are both good choices. Just bump it up a little at a time if you want a little more performance. Also, on MikRunny you have the option of setting the Battery Performance Levels to.
TEAM MiK
MikROMs Since 3/13/11

Depends on the kernel/governor.
Also I prefer no frills.

VICODAN said:
Depends on the kernel/governor.
Also I prefer no frills.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am running the ext 4 kernel that was already on it
Sent from my PG06100 using XDA

Your going to have to experiment a bit to figure out what's best for you. Because of the variables involved, there isn't just one setting that is going to work for everyone. I prefer SetCPU as an OC control.
TEAM MiK
MikROMs Since 3/13/11

VICODAN said:
Depends on the kernel/governor.
Also I prefer no frills.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No frills is great

sparksco said:
No frills is great
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No frills is the boss cpu adjusting app i.m.o... Setcpu has been known to drain the battery and also doesnt let you change your i/o scheduler... No frills has everything but voltage adjustment options, and if you want voltage adjustment options, antutu has a cpu app that also includes that feature...
Sent from my PG06100

Whats a good I/O schedule
Sent from my PG06100 using XDA

B RAD G 296 said:
Whats a good I/O schedule
Sent from my PG06100 using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It depends what kernel. X99percent has his on deadline but cfq works ok. Most sense kernels don't include bfq but bfq tends to drain battery more.

sparksco said:
It depends what kernel. X99percent has his on deadline but cfq works ok. Most sense kernels don't include bfq but bfq tends to drain battery more.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have the ext 4 kernel, i forget the name but i no it starts with a D
Sent from my PG06100 using XDA

B RAD G 296 said:
I have the ext 4 kernel, i forget the name but i no it starts with a D
Sent from my PG06100 using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yeah honestly man its better to just start playing with numbers, i have 2 EVO Shifts right this second and one on 1.5 ghz runs just as good as the one clocked to 1.7 its all in how the phone decides to use that kernel, also the difference in my shifts is one HATES Dodges ext4 with a passion the other HATES X99 with a passion, its nothing against either dev because their both great, its just a limitation of phone, these processors wasnt meant to be cracked up by more than 125% id say a safe max speed would be 1.2 like the Kingdom since it rocks the same hardware as the shift just clocked faster. but i dunno man thats my 2 cents ive taken a big break in android and xda so maybe my thought process is off just a bit

strapped365 said:
yeah honestly man its better to just start playing with numbers, i have 2 EVO Shifts right this second and one on 1.5 ghz runs just as good as the one clocked to 1.7 its all in how the phone decides to use that kernel, also the difference in my shifts is one HATES Dodges ext4 with a passion the other HATES X99 with a passion, its nothing against either dev because their both great, its just a limitation of phone, these processors wasnt meant to be cracked up by more than 125% id say a safe max speed would be 1.2 like the Kingdom since it rocks the same hardware as the shift just clocked faster. but i dunno man thats my 2 cents ive taken a big break in android and xda so maybe my thought process is off just a bit
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have a rev 0004 so I'm guessing you have two shifts that are different revisions like one is a 0004 and one is a 0005. And what do you mean they hate the kernels? You get lockups or something?

luck of the draw
Mines revision 4 runs great on either kernel. Lucky I guess.

sparksco said:
I have a rev 0004 so I'm guessing you have two shifts that are different revisions like one is a 0004 and one is a 0005. And what do you mean they hate the kernels? You get lockups or something?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No sir both rev 0004 bought them Valentine day last year? Maybe the year before last I dunno I know we got them shortly after they came out. And yes lockups on one and the other just runs like a turd man i don't get it they are the same phone on basically the same Rom
Sent from my myTouch_4G_Slide using Tapatalk