Related
Features
- Fully 100% SuperD 1.9.3
- Running the latest WG-Kernel v3-beta[10mb RHack / CFS]
e.g. This new kernel gave OpenEclair users a tremendous speed performance boost in the latest 1.2.2
- Removed DangerSPL Requirement
- CompCache is enabled by default at 16mb
- Adjusted Scheduler Values to help support the CFS Scheduler
- Adjusted LowMemKiller Values to help support apps that should be kept alive
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Download: http://www.androidspin.com/downloads.php?dir=wesgarner/ROM/&file=SuperD193-blk-WGKv3beta.zip
I made this for fun since someone had made a version of SuperD based off my kernel from back well months ago lol - thought I should give a try at working on the ROM
This is a pretty one time thing. If people like the speed differences a lot, someone talk to Ben about working the kernel into SuperD
I will be monitering this thread for feedback
This have the RAM hack?
CaptainShanks said:
This have the RAM hack?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yup yup, sorry just added that
will keep you posted. i got the update during class so it's something i'll be playing with the next couple days. thanks brah.
Starting it up now.
Edit: Right off the bat i was able to go from flashed to homescreen in about 3 minutes.
Everything looks smooth so far, i'm in the process of installing some apps. Should be fun
Testing out now, thanks Wes!
Feedback - will add to this list
ADB is working (not currently working on RHack versions of 1.9.3)
CC works fine
BT works
BenchmarkPi is a LIL bit faster (between 12970 - 13650 for WG-Kernel) will test orig tomorrow
Overall: Seems speedy so far, gonna be hard to tell the difference as Ben's kernel is already pretty quick
EDIT: For those of you that are lazy like me, you CANNOT simply pull and flash the boot.img as it breaks CC. Just FYI
[ROM] Super D 1.9.3 with [Official] WG-Kernel v3-beta(10mb RHack)
I have been using this all day and it is running really smooth without any problems at all. It is very fast and I have not noticed any glitches yet, I'm loving it.
flashing now...
chris6551 said:
I have been using this all day and it is running really smooth without any problems at all. It is very fast and I have not noticed any glitches yet, I'm loving it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
All day?
chris6551 said:
I have been using this all day and it is running really smooth without any problems at all. It is very fast and I have not noticed any glitches yet, I'm loving it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just a question, but how have you been running this all day. It was just released like ~40min ago. If you mean SuperD 1.9.3 then your in the wrong forum, this is just for the WG-Kernel for SuperD193
Is wipe recommended coming from SD 1.9.3?
So this is the SuperD everyone is talking about with wes's kernel added and I DON'T need Danger SPL to flash it? Tell me I have this correct. I've been wanting to try this rom out but have tried to avoid the DSPL route. Any partition lay out requirements?
no its the same as superd but just with dif kernel we are looking for differances to compare to, as I use cyanogen kernel in mine and ya benchmark speed test etc on this ROM
bbuchacher said:
no its the same as superd but just with dif kernel we are looking for differances to compare to, as I use cyanogen kernel in mine and ya benchmark speed test etc on this ROM
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
this.. is... QUICK!
with the original 1.9.3 With ram hack, i had this weird dragging effect, and slow from the get go, but this version is QUICK!
bbuchacher you should DEFENATELY use this kernel, or find some way to make your kernel faster than this, great work ben and great work wes, you guys are geniouses
Im also noticing an increase in performance.
Without doing much tests, the system feels faster with this kernel at least when changing apps and switching between desktops. BTW, is there a way to do a more "objective" speed test?
Thoughts on the need to wipe coming from Super D 1.9.3 to this???
So I guess because of the ram hack, I wouldn't be able to play all the cool games.
Works like a charm. Much faster then the standard kernel.
This kernel module allows you to run any stock HTC Froyo kernel with lowered CPU voltages. Reducing voltage decreases power consumption by the CPU, thus lowering heat and increasing battery life.
INSTALL:
You need root or an unrestricted recovery image (e.g ClockworkMod) to install this. The default settings decrease voltage by 75-100 mV which seems stable on my device (HTC Desire) and is reported to be fine on the EVO. Just download the attached file and select it from recovery or ROM Manager.
I've built "update.zip" files for the EVO 4G with Linux kernel versions 2.6.32.15-g746f4f0, 2.6.32.15-ge2fb08e, and 2.6.32.15-g59b9e50. You can check your kernel version in Settings->About phone->Software information.
Other HTC devices running Froyo are supported. If you have a different device, please give me the full version number and I can add an update.zip for it.
Full details and source are in the original thread in the Desire forum:
[KERNEL] Undervolt driver for the stock HTC kernel for Desire and others (2.6.32.15)
Update, 2010-11-22: Added driver for 2.6.32.15-ge2fb08e.
Update, 2010-11-23: Added driver for 2.6.32.15-g59b9e50.
recant: love this idea when trying to keep this stock
Sounds like it would go well with Fresh's new rom.
ericwgarza1 said:
Sounds like it would go well with Fresh's new rom.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+ 1 on that I agree
sweet I like. Does it change the kernel version?
Too weak... funny considering there is more work involved in setting this up than most linux guys even do on a pc... let alone a phone.
tatnai said:
what's this here? sounds like an add on for those too weak at heart to flash a modded kernel. will likely find some friends, strong work.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sent from my PC36100 using XDA App
tatnai said:
what's this here? sounds like an add on for those too weak at heart to flash a modded kernel. will likely find some friends, strong work.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Maybe not. I run the netarchy kernel but don't OC because it seems to crash at random times. I use it because the battery life is better than stock.
I'll revert to a clean back-up and give this a try just for giggles.
I would like to see some results.
I say that because I have tried a few havs roms and get worse battery life.
I think what a lot of people don't realize unless they are heavily into overocking is that microadjustments just dont have much effect there needs to be some substantial drops to really have any effect on battery and heat.
I realize that this is no desktop or laptop cpu, and that this cpu is based off such low voltages but such minor voltage adjustments, 80-100mv just arent going to have the desired effect unless that equates to a "substantial" voltage drop.
Not to mention the fact that most of you are going to overclock your phone without the faintest idea that doing so, even with a lower cpu voltage, will still cause worse battery life. This is a fact.. to argue it is futile. Its the nature of the beast.. do some reading and find out for yourself.
You can overcome some things by using on demand overclocking but you have to do extensive testing to find the sweet spot.
fr4nk1yn said:
Maybe not. I run the netarchy kernel but don't OC because it seems to crash at random times. I use it because the battery life is better than stock.
I'll revert to a clean back-up and give this a try just for giggles.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sent from my PC36100 using XDA App
Nice work. I'm not interested in oc'ing, nor flashing a custom kernel. I may give this a go after a few others check in w/ results. I just want to know that it's stable.
I went to your other thread and saw the source. Clever solution, nice work. I really do like that you wrote a device to /proc that does a little more than report the frequencies back. This will make it very easy to write some scripts, or even a UI, that lets me tweak the settings. Hopefully I have some time to work on that in the upcoming weekends.
Will take a look at this first chance I get. Trying to finish my battery logger since everything available now doesn't log exactly what I want to know. Kudos.
Does this make HAVS obsolete ?
iscaela said:
This kernel module allows you to run any stock HTC Froyo kernel with lowered CPU voltages. Reducing voltage decreases power consumption by the CPU, thus lowering heat and increasing battery life.
INSTALL:
You need root or an unrestricted recovery image (e.g ClockworkMod) to install this. The default settings decrease voltage by 75-100 mV which seems stable on my device (HTC Desire) and is reported to be fine on the EVO. Just download the attached file and select it from recovery or ROM Manager.
I've built "update.zip" file for the EVO with Linux kernel version 2.6.32.15-g746f4f0. You can check your kernel version in Settings->About phone->Software information.
Other HTC devices running Froyo are supported. If you have a different device, please give me the full version number and I can add an update.zip for it.
Full details and source are in the original thread in the Desire forum:
[KERNEL] Undervolt driver for the stock HTC kernel for Desire and others (2.6.32.15)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Undervolting meaning only when screens off or on and off ?
I installed and will get the best battery life yet. Better than when I was with King and other kernels....thanks!!!
Anyone have any results from flashing this yet? How is battery life? Any stability issues?
look4wisdom said:
Anyone have any results from flashing this yet? How is battery life? Any stability issues?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No stability issues and it seems to help on battery a little bit but I really can't tell a big deference. I was expecting for it to help out more. Thanks anyways OP for the share
i did say those little microvoltages aint gunna make any difference.
plus if you try to overclock you just cancelled any lowered voltages and actually cause higher power draw than stock mhz at stock voltages.
higher mhz equals higher power draw whether you have it undervolted or not.
you have to make a signifigant drop in voltage to make any difference at all. let alone if you try and overclock.
not trying to dog the guy who discovered this i am just sing plain and simple math, heat, and electronic voltages.
Sent from my PC36100 using XDA App
question there a some diference between this kernel and the once from King and Net, talking about battery life and performance
juancaperez2000 said:
question there a some diference between this kernel and the once from King and Net, talking about battery life and performance
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This isn't a kernel its just a couple of files that go with the kernel. One file for initial boot ect/initd and a .ko file that goes in system/lib/module folder.
I have an Evo, [email protected] #11. I would like to try it. Please build an update.zip to support it.
Cheers.
snovvman said:
I have an Evo, [email protected] #11. I would like to try it. Please build an update.zip to support it.
Cheers.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
OP
Sent from my EViO + PURE= PURE Baked EViO
In case you don't already know, this script is written for CM6 roms, but has been ported to many others. The main purpose is to increase battery life and performance of the phone it's running on.
To install, simply download the file in the link below, copy it to your SD card, reboot into recovery and flash it.
As always, the latest version still can get around 24+ hours of battery life with normal usage under CM6 on a HTC Hero.
I only test this tweak on the Hero CDMA, but it's possible that it works on other phones. I really do expect that this will be the last version of V3 and will become "final" one we've verified that it works on all phones.
New features:
Allows disk scheduler changes for even faster disk access.
CFS Tweak (disabled by default) modified to play nicer with GPS.
Collin_ph Battery Tweak v3 RC2: http://www.primoweb.com/froyo/collin_ph_battery_tweak_v3_rc2.zip
Documentation: http://www.primoweb.com/froyo/battery_tweak_v3.html
Please check the doc page often as I've not yet updated the battery tweak from other versions yet.
Please note, if you're new, there is a lot of features that aren't covered here, such as the ability to configure nearly every tweak within battery tweak, so PLEASE check out the docs. If you have any questions please let me know. Thanks!
Thanks to:
Decad3nce for porting rc1 to the eris, and for working with me to develop this release.
Tomatosoup for helping work on the next release which will be called tweaktool.
There's not much there now, but keep your eyes peeled on tweaktool.com -- once that tool is available, it should work on many more phones and be available on the market.
NOTE: Several users have let me know that they are getting marked improved performance by changing the scheduler from "ondemand" to "interactive" through the custom settings. The "ondemand" scheduler is the default in RC2, but will most likely be replaced with the "interactive" scheduler in the final release. You may consider choosing a custom option at this point and changing the scheduler to "interactive". I'd appreciate any input you may have on this subject.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
By the way, I'm saving up to take my kids to see the last launch of the space shuttle Discovery on November 1st. If you like and use the tweak, please consider donating using the following link:
Or at least upvote my reddit thread
http://www.reddit.com/r/reddit.com/comments/dk53y/garage_sale_to_support_taking_my_kids_to_see_the/
WEWT!!
wewt! you the man
Thanks so much! I'll give this a shot on ZenEXP tonight and let you know how my battery does tomorrow.
So in this update do I still have to run batt-cfg to get everything set up? Also, can I check if it's working the same way? (pidoff bat.sh?)
You don't have to run batt-cfg, it should run as is unless you want to tweak the settings. and the command to check if it is working is pidof batt.sh
Love the battery life I get with you battery tweak. Just installed the rc2, thanks for the awesome work.
Having problems with the link. Anyone else?
Sent from my HERO200 using XDA App
Macanage said:
Having problems with the link. Anyone else?
Sent from my HERO200 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nope, just d/l'd.
Thanks for this collin_ph
Says its down for me.
Sent from my HERO200 using XDA App
The Xda "App" on the phone does not show the attached zip that is at the bottom of the forum post.
Probably will have to go to Xda via the browser.
Sent from my HERO200 using XDA App
Jon.StatiK said:
Says its down for me.
Sent from my HERO200 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Says down for me also
OOPS Another d/l link at the bottom of the post
Sorry about the site being down folks, had a problem with the server. It's back up and running, luckily I had attached the file to the thread. Sorry for the inconvenience.
collin_ph said:
Sorry about the site being down folks, had a problem with the server. It's back up and running, luckily I had attached the file to the thread. Sorry for the inconvenience.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
bump. 10char
Works great with cm6 stable. Definitely my preference over setcpu or OC widget. Thanks alot.
Sent from my HERO200 using XDA App
So I was looking through the batt.sh code and saw that swapiness was set to 0. Does this imply that paging in/out drains battery?
Is there any typos in this release? lol jk.. but really
Sent from my HERO200 using XDA App
Is using this tweak with the #14 uncapped kernel ok? should i delete setcpu, before i flashed this tweak i was getting 4.8 linpack after install it went to 3.9 what am i doing wrong lol
dirkydirk23 said:
Is using this tweak with the #14 uncapped kernel ok? should i delete setcpu, before i flashed this tweak i was getting 4.8 linpack after install it went to 3.9 what am i doing wrong lol
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Make sure you delete set CPU if you're using this tweak. They don't work well together.
After going over the script code, I noticed that the governor is set to "ondemand". Does that provide better battery life than "interactive"? Also, what is the purpose of the disk tweaks? When they were enabled, my battery life was horrible. Perhaps because I use Darktremor's A2SD?
nspot said:
After going over the script code, I noticed that the governor is set to "ondemand". Does that provide better battery life than "interactive"? Also, what is the purpose of the disk tweaks? When they were enabled, my battery life was horrible. Perhaps because I use Darktremor's A2SD?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
IMO, it really depends on your use.
If you use very intensive applications, you'd want your processor to jump to max right away(ondemand). But lets say that you just unlock your screen to send a quick text, interactive would be a lot better.
Interactive, overall, will always have better battery life. The problem is that it sometimes 'sticks' to the min freq before ramping, making garbage collection crap out something fierce.
Decad3nce said:
IMO, it really depends on your use.
If you use very intensive applications, you'd want your processor to jump to max right away(ondemand). But lets say that you just unlock your screen to send a quick text, interactive would be a lot better.
Interactive, overall, will always have better battery life. The problem is that it sometimes 'sticks' to the min freq before ramping, making garbage collection crap out something fierce.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I see. I can't say I've noticed the slow ramp-up with "interactive" before, but the note about garbage collection makes sense. But going back to my earlier question, I noticed that the disk tweaks simply amounted to mounting certain directories to new locations. Still unclear on how these increase performance/battery life.
As an aside, the dalvik VM heap parameter is equivalent to the JVM heap, correct?
ANDROID CREATIVE SYNDICATEpresentsXTREME KERNEL V1.2.0
First of all, I want to put my thank yous up here at the top, so, here they are:
-geniusdog254 - My primary teammate, been helping me every step of way.
-nullghost - One really cool dude. Always on when I ask for help. Git would still be a scary thing if not for him.
-rjmjr69 - Funny, funny dude. Keeps me motivated to keep going
-The Voodoo Team - Your work is awesome!
-My beta testers - You were/are all great. Thanks for helping me with this!
-All the devs across the board - Seriously, you're all a bunch of absolutely awesome people.
-Anyone I forgot - You're all great!
Now, here we go:
THE STANDARD DISCLAIMER
I, DevinXtreme, AM NOT responsible for what happens to your phone, your cat, your house, or anything relating to you! If your phone bricks, OH WELL. Have a nice day.
This kernel has a MixUp kernel base. DI18, blah blah. I deviated once Interactive got working. I also removed the Voodoo color modification. So, there's that.
It is built and designed for Syndicate ROM, which will be out later tonight. Sickest ROM you've ever seen. The version released with the ROM is slightly different, but only for fun's sake
Changelog:
v1.2.0
-Removed the 1.6GHz step. The time machine is gone. Plus, was causing more problems than it was helping.
-Added 1.3GHz step courtesy Herver
-Switched from MPLL to APLL. Smoothness and speed increase. Thanks to nullghost for help on this.
-Added Voodoo color mod, tweaked version, courtesy Herver. I will be maintaining a no-voodoo version. I just haven't yet.
-Tweaked the light sensor, adding a new step and made it not jump to the brightest setting as much. Should save battery and transition smoother. Also pols a little more often.
-Tweaked scaling rules for 1.3GHz. Should scale there less, thus saving battery.
ADDITION: The file ending in 'nv.zip' is a no-voodoo version. The file ending in 'ov.zip' is the version for the original voodoo mod, not the tweaked one.
v1.0.1
-Fixed scaling. Linpack scores and tests work fine now.
-Disabled Carrier IQ in init.rc. Carrier IQ is essentially Sprint spyware. Kernel devs: This is really easy to do. Just comment out the iqmsd lines at the end.
v1.0
-Overclock to 1.6GHz!! Requires SetCPU which is, for some reason, defaulting to performance. Make sure you change it to conservative.
-Default governor without SetCPU is conservative with 200MHz-1GHz steps.
-Removed Voodoo
-Framerate unlocked (78-80fps)
-Built for ROMs with a custom boot. Makes stock boot look like garbage. We're working (still) to fix this.
-Undervolted
KNOWN BUGS:
-In spare parts, if you set the WiFi policy to never sleep, it still sleeps with the screen off. -skandranon314
-Some weird vibration thing going on when 1.6GHz is hit.
NOTES:
Linpack is being strange with this. I'm getting between 9.2 and 9.8 with some REALLY strange numbers. I'll have this fixed this weekend.
SetCPU sets the default governor to performance. If you use it, be sure to change it immediately for battery life.
FOR 1.2
-I recommend 200MHz-1200MHz. Some phones can't reach 1.3GHz safely.
-200MHz - 800/1000MHz is a great setting for battery and you should still have a very smooth experience.
For those who care, I get 1135+ in quadrant.
You can read my source here.
Thanks, guys. I hope you enjoy!
How stable is this??
When is the rom out?
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
Looking forward to trying this out!
1.6 GHz???????
That's awesome, though I don't think I'll crank it that high.
Is there any advantage to this vs MixUp running at 1.0 Ghz?
spitefulrain said:
How stable is this??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've hit no bumps, neither have my testers.
joshottley said:
When is the rom out?
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Give it a couple of hours.
SORRY, HAD TO TAKE IT DOWN FOR JUST A LITTLE BIT. EXPECT AT ~12:45AM MST.
Why take it down? I already downloaded and flashed, was that a bad idea??
I'm running it. Smooth so far.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
Dusting the epic off now.
[email protected] said:
Dusting the epic off now.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Should have never abandoned dude lol.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
Very smooth so far. got 1194 on quad, and 9.2 average on linpack. Wonder how the battery life will fare.
spitefulrain said:
Why take it down? I already downloaded and flashed, was that a bad idea??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nope, just a tweak. Your phone is fine! XD
And I'll be in a movie, so I won't be able to get it up until then. Sorry guys!
DevinXtreme said:
Nope, just a tweak. Your phone is fine! XD
And I'll be in a movie, so I won't be able to get it up until then. Sorry guys!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok, good. I was worried for a sec
So would you recommend flashing the new one when it's up since you're tweaking it?
Hmm.. something's not right here. I just got 22 fps in Neocore with the removed kernel. What could I be doing wrong?
Edit: Switching from performance to conservative upped my results to 62 fps which is quite respectable.
spitefulrain said:
Ok, good. I was worried for a sec
So would you recommend flashing the new one when it's up since you're tweaking it?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, it'll be a good idea.
what kind of voltage are you giving it to get 1.6 stable? based on what im reading, anything above 1.3/1.4 is pretty much unachievable on these devices and is not really the speed that the device is running thus the unscaled rise in benchmark scores. iv been following hero_over and he couldnt get a stable 1.4 OC although he did get 1.3ghz on stock volts stable..which keeps me wondering if we really can hit 1.6 stable
illogic6 said:
Hmm.. something's not right here. I just got 22 fps in Neocore with the removed kernel. What could I be doing wrong?
Edit: Switching from performance to conservative upped my results to 62 fps which is quite respectable.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
lol I was gonna say. I'm going good with Neocore as well.
d94 said:
what kind of voltage are you giving it to get 1.6 stable? based on what im reading, anything above 1.3/1.4 is pretty much unachievable on these devices and is not really the speed that the device is running thus the unscaled rise in benchmark scores. iv been following hero_over and he couldnt get a stable 1.4 OC although he did get 1.3ghz on stock volts stable..which keeps me wondering if we really can hit 1.6 stable
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
All of it is on my git. I release my source, as devs should with GPL. The problem is that the fsb isn't scaled properly, affecting the floating point processor, causing low Linpack scores. I'll have it worked out this weekend,
Bummer.... I missed the link the first go around..... Will be waiting
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
If this was a hero_over post, he'd be in trouble for a teaser post lol... just trolling lol. Had to have a smart ass comment
Quick. And stable so far
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
I have tried the other Kernels available , Genocide, Twilight etc. The performance gains are real and it is amazing what the developers are doing.
However I have significant instability with these Kernels compared to Stock. I use my phone for business and stability is #1 priority for me. The only fix I really need is the skipped key press bug. I am running stock now but the keyboard is unusable without the fix.
Would one of the developers that knows what they are doing have time to compile a stock kernel with only the skipped keyboard fix implemented?
Thanks!
violinbf said:
I have tried the other Kernels available , Genocide, Twilight etc. The performance gains are real and it is amazing what the developers are doing.
However I have significant instability with these Kernels compared to Stock. I use my phone for business and stability is #1 priority for me. The only fix I really need is the skipped key press bug. I am running stock now but the keyboard is unusable without the fix.
Would one of the developers that knows what they are doing have time to compile a stock kernel with only the skipped keyboard fix implemented?
Thanks!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The closest thing I've found is this:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1039991
I'm like you, I want stability above all else and I only wanted the skipped keyboard fix. I don't care about overclock/undervolting and what not. Just want something stable. Although this kernel has some other minor changes, it's pretty much stock.
I just flashed this kernel this morning and haven't had any issues thus far but it's only been a few hours.
I'll report back tomorrow and let you know if I run into any issues.
Wrong section dude this need to be in general.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA Premium App
Clean Kernel EC05 should suit you well, and finally has a proper post here:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1053252
It has no volting done, and has the same performance as the stock kernel.
Hope you like it!
DRockstar said:
Clean Kernel EC05 should suit you well, and finally has a proper post here:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1053252
It has no volting done, and has the same performance as the stock kernel.
Hope you like it!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just wanted to say thanks again for compiling that kernel. Downloaded voodoo controller from the market as well. Didn't realize what I was missing as far as sound quality!
Not to rudely question your decision, but have you tried any customs that support voltage control? (Currently only genocide, but twilight is promising it soon). I used to have terrible instability, but it was because my phone couldn't handle undervolting... genocide + voltage control removing undervolt fixed that.
On a side note, if you decide to try genocide make sure you go to the end and look for the 1.0.1 test build, it fixed the kswapd0 high cpu usage bug (rare, but definitely made the phone less stable). I've had 18 hours of perfect uptime (not battery of course) since installing the update, and I have large tendancy to max out my phone.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
I'd like to have stock, ext4, and keyboard fix. Stability is my #1 priority as well...that being said, I'm running the Genocide kernel at stock speed, and it seems pretty stable. Been using now for a matter of weeks.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
Thread in the wrong section. Please post in the proper section. Thread closed.