Hello!!!
What do you think the new JAMin, is better than M600??.
The 200mhz is dual core?. Is it fast enough?.
Regards,
Porras
Thinking likewise
I also like the qtek 8310 TI OMAP 850, 200MHz
Is 200mhz fast enough for Skype ???
Please, some one has some information about M600 vrs JAMin?.
200mhz, dual core. It is right?.
Is it fast enoght, for everything?.
Regards,
Gabriel Porras
some information??
M600 Info
Hi
I have a M600 at the moment its very fast
cpu is a S3C2440A 400Mhz
64Mb ram
128Mb Rom
WM5
And it will take a 4gb SD Card
It has a lot of good software inclouded
i can post screenshots if you like
Both of these appear to have similar features except one has an OMAP processor and the other an Intel, which has a higher clock speed. Which of these in your opinion is the better all around performer? Your comments will be most appreciated.
I'm curious -- can someone who understands the technology of cpu design tell me what the real differences are between the x7510 Intel cpu and the Qualcomm cpu in the current HTC releases? Is there any significant performance difference? And how does the x7510 SDRAM compare to the Touch series DDR SDRAM memory?
Thanks!
the intel xscale beats the qualcomm anytime in my experience.
don't know about the RAM.
Is there much of difference beside clock speed. from the msm7200 in the touch pro 2 and the xscale running at 800mhz in the omnia II in terms of performance? ANy help would be appreciated.
If you ask me it (should) make quite a difference. The msm7200 is quite notorious for it's quite allright clockspeed but slow performance.
I used to have a Diamond (with 528 mhz) and then got a Omnia (Marvell 624 mhz) which was already quite a difference. I guess the 800 mhz will make even more of a difference.
Do note that there is a big difference in resolution between the Diamond and the Omnia, so that will also give some speed increase. The Omnia II has a Samsung 800 mhz chip (as far as I know) and I don't know what kind of performance that will give.
Both cpu's are a ARMv6 (afaik), so in that perspective you could say the 800 mhz is faster than the 528 mhz.
See this:
Samsung chip: http://pdadb.net/index.php?m=cpu&id=a6410&c=samsung_s3c6410
Qualcomm chip: http://pdadb.net/index.php?m=cpu&id=a7200a&c=qualcomm_msm7200a
My old diamond was much slower than my current ipaq 211. The ipaq has a 624mhz marvell and is much faster and more responsive than the diamond. It can also play videos back much better. 800mhz would just increase the performance gap.
The Omnia II is Arm11 which is slightly faster than the iphone 3G(both get blown out of the water by the 3Gs), and should support OpenGL ES 2.0.
Here's Samsungs Data sheet on it: http://www.samsung.com/global/syste.../2008/5/30/785500s3c6410_datasheet_200804.pdf
The msm7200, i BELIEVE(dont quote me), would be faster than the SC36410, if it had proper drivers.. however, thats not the case.
numbers are an indicator and nothing more. They give you a clue but clues can be very misleading. If they were usefull, why would you need benchmarking?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Megahertz_myth
(yeah i know wiki is sometimes full of BS but it certainly backs up what I learned in Uni and during my assembler cracking/virus writing days)
The ONLY way to compare CPU's is to run the same application and then run the SAME task in that application. Once you have done so ALL you can say is "For performing task X in application Y, processor ZXY running operating system ABC is faster on the BLAHBLAH platform" and nothing more. It does not mean its faster at everything or indeed, you cannot say its faster than ANYTHING else until you have tested it.
At the end of the day, the processor is affected by drivers, processor design and the operating system and its installaition.
and Software.. if theres no apps that incorporates acceleration, then its wasted.
what about qualcomm 1G snapdragon cpu?
how fast is that compares to current 528mzh? haha
i'm waiting for Acer S200 with 1G cpu.
netnerd said:
what about qualcomm 1G snapdragon cpu?
how fast is that compares to current 528mzh? haha
i'm waiting for Acer S200 with 1G cpu.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
please re-read and if you still don't understand, i'll try and explain again.
clearly, marvell is better, even the mhz is lesser than what qualcomm offers!
having better decoders also like video playback & multitasking when video is playing!
waiting for devices with marvell cpu pxa168 series.
they use qualcomm chip becoz its cheaper & provide hsdpa to network & GPS module while the rest does not come with it. so individual chip must be used. but its better like GPSone VS SiRF III
solomobi.com/product-3868.html (copy and paste)
It's an iPhone clone (no pun intended) that has 128MB RAM and 128MB ROM with a Marvell PXA310 CPU. It's £92 and I have a 2GB MicroSD card to extend the memory.
Is it any good?
Bump
I think it could be a great phone but I need other people's opinions to help me.
Is the Marvell PXA310 running at 624MHz a good CPU?
Is the 128MB RAM good for a phone like this?
Bump
Is there anything interesting about this phone?
???
I'm hoping to use this phone for media and apps because of its big screen and good CPU. Is it worth the money?