Related
This was already mentioned by alansj here, but I though it was important enough to have it's own thread
Saurik has created a Debian image you can install onto your sd card. Once installed, you have the full power of debian on your phone. No more puny little busybox
Instructions and such are here.
Thanks Saurik!
I was actually looking into this earlier... let me know how it runs
cant download a few things
can not open ext2.ko......when i type insmod $kit/ext2.ko ...i get "insmod: can't open ' /sdcard/kit/ext2.ko'...some one please help me out
What graphical interface does this install, or is there one?
cbrunner said:
What graphical interface does this install, or is there one?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That was my question when I heard about this... I just went for it though because when I read through the instructions, I realized that everything is stored in the MicroSD card and in RAM (which is reset when the phone is rebooted)
It turns out that there is no GUI - just a good old text-based Debian install! I'm sure that someone will get one working... or maybe just port the entire BSD Subsystem along with apt so we can just forget the Market...
amgupt01 said:
That was my question when I heard about this... I just went for it though because when I read through the instructions, I realized that everything is stored in the MicroSD card and in RAM (which is reset when the phone is rebooted)
It turns out that there is no GUI - just a good old text-based Debian install! I'm sure that someone will get one working... or maybe just port the entire BSD Subsystem along with apt so we can just forget the Market...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This awesome article has answered tons of my questions and also seems to imply otherwise:
"This does not replace Android. This also gives you access to the full plethora of programs available in Debian and let's you continue using your phone as it was intended to be: as an Android device with all the capabilities thereof."
In addition, this IRC channel is where the author of that article idles.
cbrunner said:
This awesome article has answered tons of my questions and also seems to imply otherwise:
"This does not replace Android. This also gives you access to the full plethora of programs available in Debian and let's you continue using your phone as it was intended to be: as an Android device with all the capabilities thereof."
In addition, this IRC channel is where the author of that article idles.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Right. No gui, but you have a full working linux distro on your phone. You can apt-get just about any of the normal stuff.. You could probably even get a x-windows installation to working, although you would have to connect to it remotely - it would probably be "difficult" to get it to display a gui on the phone itself (although that would be sweet).
I've installed Saurik's image on my phone, it works great. Although if you do the "unionfs.sh" step, the wifi settings don't quite work right anymore. It won't let you enable or disable wifi.
But I was able to get an ssh server (with real user and password management) and even a samba server running on my phone quite easily with this . I've also got gcc installed, and will start playing around with developing directly on the phone (instead of having to cross compile).
Sorry for not being hip to the game, but what the heck is Debian?
donutman said:
Sorry for not being hip to the game, but what the heck is Debian?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Arguably the most influential distribution of Linux ever. Its package management system, apt, is awesome, and it is what Ubuntu and tons of other distros were started from.
Why would you not use Google before asking here?
can anyone help with my above mentioned problem
i want this baby to run
Is your phone connected to your computer? You lose access to the storage card when it is, I think (you can't cd to it when it's plugged in) and unplugging my phone allowed me to install the module.
/a
Installing Debian errors?
Here is what I get:
insmod $kit/ext2.ko
insmod: init_module '/sdcard/kit/ext2.ko' failed (Operation not permitted)
i've been through this, i'm not gonna explain what happens and why, but imo, the only way to get a real root is the following:
-Install telnet client to your device (from android market).
-Reboot your phone to be sure no telnet-daemons/shells are running.
-When you are on the desktop, just type "enter", "telnetd", "enter". (If you do it from the terminal app it will run under the uid of the terminal app which is not root).
-Then run the telnet client app, and connect to local host. (Or skip this step + the first one if you wanna connect from another pc)
I know it's weird, but when you run something from the terminal app it runs under the terminal app's uid, even if you run a new shell, you still are eg. "app_33", not root. and btw you will have to set the environment variables all from the same shell, that means you can't have a script cause it will run under another shell, with another uid. I'm so confused... maybe I'm wrong but android is not the most friendly environment.
aggtrfrad said:
i've been through this, i'm not gonna explain what happens and why, but imo, the only way to get a real root is the following:
-Install telnet client to your device (from android market).
-Reboot your phone to be sure no telnet-daemons/shells are running.
-When you are on the desktop, just type "enter", "telnetd", "enter". (If you do it from the terminal app it will run under the uid of the terminal app which is not root).
-Then run the telnet client app, and connect to local host. (Or skip this step + the first one if you wanna connect from another pc)
I know it's weird, but when you run something from the terminal app it runs under the terminal app's uid, even if you run a new shell, you still are eg. "app_33", not root. and btw you will have to set the environment variables all from the same shell, that means you can't have a script cause it will run under another shell, with another uid. I'm so confused... maybe I'm wrong but android is not the most friendly environment.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Haha I feel you. Now the thing is when I am at the home screen on my G1 i push "Enter" on the keyboard and then type "telnetd" and then push enter again it doesnt do anything. When I open up telnet client on my PC it wont connect with wifi on.
So I then go to Telnet client on myG1 and go to connect to "localhost:23" and it says "Error while connecting to server: localhost/127.0.0.1:23 - Connection refused" the thing is that my local host for my wifi is not 127.0.0.1:23
And when I "netstat" from inside Terminal Emulator there is no address with port "23"
ballaholyk84 said:
Haha I feel you. Now the thing is when I am at the home screen on my G1 i push "Enter" on the keyboard and then type "telnetd" and then push enter again it doesnt do anything. When I open up telnet client on my PC it wont connect with wifi on.
So I then go to Telnet client on myG1 and go to connect to "localhost:23" and it says "Error while connecting to server: localhost/127.0.0.1:23 - Connection refused" the thing is that my local host for my wifi is not 127.0.0.1:23
And when I "netstat" from inside Terminal Emulator there is no address with port "23"
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Are you already running RC30?
SplasPood said:
Are you already running RC30?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, I am running the Modified RC30 posted by JesusFreke
cbrunner said:
Why would you not use Google before asking here?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Because I wanted you to tell me baby. That is what a wife is suppose to do.
JesusFreke said:
Right. No gui, but you have a full working linux distro on your phone. You can apt-get just about any of the normal stuff.. You could probably even get a x-windows installation to working, although you would have to connect to it remotely - it would probably be "difficult" to get it to display a gui on the phone itself (although that would be sweet).
I've installed Saurik's image on my phone, it works great. Although if you do the "unionfs.sh" step, the wifi settings don't quite work right anymore. It won't let you enable or disable wifi.
But I was able to get an ssh server (with real user and password management) and even a samba server running on my phone quite easily with this . I've also got gcc installed, and will start playing around with developing directly on the phone (instead of having to cross compile).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What command did you use to get the SSH to install? Every time I do the one in the tut by saurik it errors and wont install all the way. I get an error after x11-common and it wont finish.
ballaholyk84 said:
So I then go to Telnet client on myG1 and go to connect to "localhost:23" and it says "Error while connecting to server: localhost/127.0.0.1:23 - Connection refused" the thing is that my local host for my wifi is not 127.0.0.1:23
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
localhost usually refers to the loopback interface which on most devices will be 127.0.0.1.
I'm getting the same thing here... I think there's something wrong with apt-get having to write to /tmp which does not exist (and is mounted read-only).
This is probably not that useful unless (a) you're paranoid or (b) you need access to a secured network from your phone, however I managed to build openvpn and stunnel against bionic and the onboard openssl library. These are available at http://g1.fnord.to/crypto
OpenVPN requires root access and busybox. With this you can conceivably route all IP traffic through a server somewhere by use of the 'route' command, after the VPN link is brought up. This has been tested, and does not seem to affect phone functionality.
stunnel doesn't require root afaik so you should be able to run it from /data/local. This should allow you to encrypt web traffic at least, by setting the proxy via the 'Proxy Settings' app that's available with AnyCut.
Some how I think T-Mobile might get mad if you did this... They say they allow tethering but if you go over your 10GB limit and they can't see your traffic I would think they would want to know what is up.
Good idea and I know some people are that paranoid... but I see this getting people in trouble... or maybe it is just me.
This is GREAT. I've been looking for this since the day I got my G1. I tried to compile a statically-linked binary a while back, but it was HUGE and wouldn't do much before segfaulting at me.
This gets a 4 smilies because this is how I access my work network remotely from my desktop, and now I can access some of these servers for maintenance remotely from my phone! (I would have given it a whole row of smilies, but apparently that is frowned upon.)
Thanks a million for getting this working!
I probably won't be using it as a default route, but it can be a static route to my office servers for sure!
Just got done testing this to vpn to my workplace and it works awesome. It also routes all traffic while tethering thru the vpn tunnel route.
This has been the best reason for me to get root yet.
Wow this is dope... trying to set this up now so now I can connect to my server on the go. I hope t-mobile don't even see this cuz they will be trippin over why do you need to hide your traffic but this is great no more keeping record of wat you do. Next is gonna be p2p and I will even fell back for t-mobile network lol Thanks this great
neoobs said:
Some how I think T-Mobile might get mad if you did this... They say they allow tethering but if you go over your 10GB limit and they can't see your traffic I would think they would want to know what is up.
Good idea and I know some people are that paranoid... but I see this getting people in trouble... or maybe it is just me.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It would probably help for wifi usage. I never connect to public wifi with my G1 for this very reason. I have openvpn running on my router at home so I can tunnel into it when i'm wifi-ing on the go. If the G1 is in an area where there is no 3G coverage but there is public wifi, this might just be what the doctor ordered.
Can the G1 auto connect to openvpn whenever it connects to a network (via wifi), i want it to automatically poll mail for me..
The openvpn daemon is designed to autoreconnect if a keepalive ping fails. I would think if it is running in the background and you changed from Edge/3g to Wifi that it would force a reconnect situation, and it would re-establish the vpn through the new connection.
I will test this right now and get back to you
After testing, it works as expected. ~60 seconds after starting wifi I got the following message:
Inactivity timeout (--ping-restart), restarting
After that it re-established the tunnel through the new interface, and I was able to access machines at my office again.
I didn't know if anyone used a shell script to start/stop their VPN but I made the following so that I can easily start and stop it
Code:
#!/system/bin/sh
case "$1" in
'start')
modprobe tun
/data/local/bin/openvpn --config /path/to/config.ovpn --writepid /data/local/openvpn.pid &
;;
'stop')
kill -9 `cat /data/local/openvpn.pid`
sleep 2
rmmod tun
;;
*)
echo "Usage: $0 [start|stop]"
;;
esac
Instead of keepalive for timeout detection, it would be nice to have hooks called on ifup/ifdown, just like debian's /etc/network/if-up.d/*.
It would allow immediate reconnection upon switching interfaces (between 3G and Wifi for example), and also prevent a situation where an interface comes up, sets the default route, and traffic goes cleartext for 60 seconds until vpn reconnection.
I can think of a lot of other uses for such hooks. Does android offer them?
If we're certain the hooks do not exist natively, I'll find a non-polling way to provide them.
I couldn't find an android interface for ifup, so I just used the netlink notifications, via ip(8). Note that you need the real iproute2 ip binary rather than the busybox one. Probably awk as well - I didn't check since I use debian binaries rather than busybox.
Here's how you use it:
Code:
ip monitor route | awk -W interactive '/^default/ {system("/data/local/bin/ifup " $5)}'
It'll execute /data/local/bin/ifup whenever the default route is changed, and pass the interface name as $1. For 3G/GPRS the interface name is usually rmnet0, whereas for WLAN it is if<num> where num is increasing on every insmod, probably indicating a leak in the tiwlan driver.
If you want it to reconnect openvpn whenver the route changes, you should probably
Code:
killall -USR1 openvpn
for any interface other than tap0 (or whatever you call your openvpn interface).
The above method can be used for earlier events such as link-up, but I figured a default route would be the best time to start openvpn. For extra paranoia, you might want to use iptables to prevent connections to anything other than openvpn on tiwlan0, and have an "up" line in your openvpn config file to set the default route through your vpn when it comes up.
When I get around to write a nice script that does the above, I'll post it here.
How much space are we talking about using with native iproute2, awk, and other binaries? I would think the amount of space used is getting rather large. I guess that it quickly becomes a good time to start using the SD card to store apps.
I've not wanted to repartition my card, but I could always make a FS image and mount it 'mount -o loop' style.
As for instant-on, I'm not using this for paranoia like some are, so instant doesn't really matter to me nearly as much as it could otherwise.
Space requirements - I don't know how much it takes with the libs since I just use it inside a debian chroot and it's all on the sdcard. I need debian anyway, to run certain X apps, etc, so for me it's not a waste of space. Anyway, if you just build iproute2 and awk, or even your own binary that just creates a netlink socket and blocks on it, it shouldn't take a lot of space. Or, if you happen to have python on the phone, it can be done in a few lines of script instead of another binary.
Re instant on, I find it better, not just for paranoia reasons (e.g. ensuring that I never send a cleartext pop3/imap password over wlan), but also for long-running connections such as ssh. If I run them over the vpn interface, I have a fixed IP and the connections persist. If, on the other hand, I create the connection directly over 3g/wlan/gprs, it'll die as soon as I change interfaces. Therefore, I'd rather run all long-running connections over openvpn. IP mobility RFC implementation would be more efficient but as long as it's not an option, a vpn will do.
By the way, do we currently have a way to tie a script/executable to an icon/shortcut, or do you run your script from a terminal?
My understanding is there are problems running apps from a gui shortcut.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=3142661&postcount=93
I run everything I do from a terminal.
I guess we need a small loader then. Something that calls Exec.createSubprocess(), just like Term.apk does. Each app will have a symlink to this ShellLoader.apk, which will execute scripts based on the name it was executed under. Another one for the TODO list
From Term.java:
Code:
public void onCreate(Bundle icicle) {
super.onCreate(icicle);
Log.e(Term.LOG_TAG, "onCreate");
setContentView(R.layout.term_activity);
mEmulatorView = (EmulatorView) findViewById(EMULATOR_VIEW);
int[] processId = new int[1];
if (TEST_MODE) {
// This is a vt100 test suite.
mTermFd = Exec.createSubprocess("/sbin/vttest", null, null);
} else {
// This is the standard Android shell.
mTermFd = Exec.createSubprocess("/system/bin/sh", "-", null,
processId);
}
final int procId = processId[0];
final Term me = this;
final Handler handler = new Handler() {
@Override
public void handleMessage(Message msg) {
me.finish();
}
};
Can we use Exec.createSubprocess() as in this above but call "/system/bin/su /data/local/bin/APPLICATIONNAME" to make the Superuser app prompts for root among other things?
Maybe create a user interface that lets you enter what you want in the place of '/data/local/bin/appName' and then when it creates the shortcut also asks if that application needs root?
It could be a list of shortcuts that is selected from a list then. Look like a list of bookmarks perhaps?
I don't know enough of the android environment to know how realistically we could do something like that.
looks like that code example from above is old. Current source from git looks different, but the call looks similar enough. I will play with it here shortly.
Yes, we could do that, including su, but be careful with it
Re bookmarks inside a single loader, I think we can do even better:
We can have a single application called Loader, and call it with different parameters using AnyCut. AnyCut has a "make your own shortcut" option, where you can provide Action, Data and Type. I'm not familiar with the Android environment yet, but I guess the Action can point to the loader, and the Data can be a script name to be executed. This way, a single .apk can be used for starting many native programs.
If implemented that way, I suggest stripping slashes from Data and prepending with /data/local/scripts/ or a similar directory, so that it can only execute scripts the user meant for it to run, rather than arbitrary shell commands. /data/local/scripts/ can contain symlinks to scripts/apps the user wishes to execute from the Android interface. It's more secure that way, while retaining usability.
Makes sense?
Certainly does. You wouldn't want someone to be able to 'rm -rf /' or anything like that.
I think I like restricting it to /data/local/scripts and forcing us to symlink or place any scripts we want to be able run in that path.
Also agree with stripping slashes. There might be other sanitizing that we would want to do to keep malicious actions from being performed.
I would think strip any special characters that have special meaning to the shell * | < > ` etc. If we want to do anything that requires these, we put it in whatever shell script and then just call the script.
Maybe the best route is to just scan the /data/local/scripts folder and allow the user to select from a list.
In any case, whoever does this already has root, so it is just as easy to launch a terminal and break everything from there.
Just a few brainstormed thoughts.
This is a program I wrote a while back that allows transparent tethering over USB without requiring root access. It works by simulating an unencrypted OpenVPN server and then internally running everything through a Java-based NAT. I get decent speeds off it, but your mileage may vary. It's a bit beta! Might explode! Wear eye protection!
It has a really basic website at http://lfx.org/azilink/, but to spare your eyes I'll just paste the instructions below:
Required files:
- ADB from the 1.1 SDK or from http://lfx.org/azilink/adb.zip
- OpenVPN 2.1 (not 2.0) from http://openvpn.net/index.php/downloads.html
- AziLink.apk from http://lfx.org/azilink/azilink.apk
- AziLink.ovpn from http://lfx.org/azilink/azilink.ovpn
Installation:
1) Install OpenVPN on the host. I use version 2.1_rc15, but any version should work. Apparently if you use version 2.0 you'll need to remove the NO_DELAY option from the AziLink.ovpn configuration file. You can find OpenVPN at:
http://openvpn.net/index.php/downloads.html
2) Enable USB debugging on the phone. From the home screen, this is under
Settings>Applications>Development>USB debugging.
3) Install the Android USB driver (if you don't already have one installed).
See http://code.google.com/android/intro/develop-and-debug.html#developingondevicehardware
4) Install the program. You can either use ADB to install by typing
"adb install azilink.apk" with the file in the current directory, or you can browse (on the phone!) to: http://lfx.org/azilink/azilink.apk
Either way you might need to allow installation from unknown sources
under Settings>Applications>Unknown Sources.
Configuration steps:
1) On the host, run "adb forward tcp:41927 tcp:41927" to set up port forwarding. Be sure to use adb from the Android 1.1 SDK! The version from 1.0 will lock up under heavy load. If you don't want to download the entire SDK, you can get a copy of ADB+drivers from http://lfx.org/azilink/adb.zip
2) On the phone, run AziLink and make sure "Service active" is checked.
3) Right click AziLink.ovpn on the host (not in the web browser!) and select "Start OpenVPN on this configuration file." You can find this file at: http://lfx.org/azilink/azilink.ovpn. If you're using Linux or, god forbid, MacOS, you'll also need to manually set the nameserver to 192.168.56.1 (the phone's NAT IP address).
Nice work around.
Wow, amazing work! I'll definitely have to mess around with this tomorrow...
OpenVPN 2.0.9
Thnx for the manual..!! Took me something to get it working, i'll find out, that it isn't working with OpenVPN version 2.0.9
OpenVPN 2.0.9 doesn't recognize the following rule in azilink.ovpn:
socket-flags TCP_NODELAY
And it worked with version 2.1rc15...
So no more Internet Sharing on Windows Mobile...
OpenVPN 2.0.9
Thnx for the manual..!! Took me sometime to get it working, i'll find out, that it isn't working with OpenVPN version 2.0.9
OpenVPN 2.0.9 doesn't recognize the following rule in azilink.ovpn:
socket-flags TCP_NODELAY
And it worked with version 2.1rc15...
So no more Internet Sharing on Windows Mobile...
help
Ok I'm a complete noob and I've played about with this but can't get it to work. How do I run adb? As in the very first step? Where do I type that. Do I need to install adb and how do I do it?
Thanks
Got it working
Man this is awesome.
I realised i needed to run the adb from cmd. see when i tried to open adb.exe it just kept closing.
thanks alot. this rocks
ps im writing this off my tethered pc
zecbmo said:
Ok I'm a complete noob and I've played about with this but can't get it to work. How do I run adb? As in the very first step? Where do I type that. Do I need to install adb and how do I do it?
Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nah, you can just unzip adb and run it directly from that folder. It's a command line program, so you'd need to run it from a command prompt (cmd.exe). I'm not sure whether adb needs to run as an administrator or not (I disable all that UAC garbage in Vista). If you have the proper driver installed, then the ADB command should return immediately without saying anything. If it says "waiting for device..." that means it wasn't able to find the Android debug driver.
I know this is all a bit hacky, but now that we've got root and wifi tethering I figured that there wouldn't be too much interest.
cheers
its working great like. im using this cus i havent rooted my phone yet. tethering was the only reason why i wanted to root it but this is a great alternative
Works Great. Thanks for the easy instructions.
Here is translation of post on Russian with images http://androidteam.ru/faq/azilink-tethering-with-android-usb.html
I have repacked all in one zip, and make some command files to make process a little easy.
another trick that may help on XP machines, probably other versions as well.
Create a shortcut to adb.exe on your windows desktop (mine is located in C:\and\tools)
Modify the 'target' (right-click,properties) of the shortcut to read C:\and\tools\adb.exe forward tcp:41927 tcp:41927 <I think this is the right code, I'm still using tetherbot on 1080>
That's it. Once everything's set up connecting is easy. one click on the computer, no cmds required
does this allow for media such as flash on web site to play on the laptop?
clevetbs said:
does this allow for media such as flash on web site to play on the laptop?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you've got enough bandwidth. I'm not really sure what bitrate flash video runs at though.
Many thanks for this, aziwoqpd. I've not had the time to root, but have been looking for an easy way to tether. A usb connection is great, since the battery drains so quickly anyway it's nice to keep a charge going.
sonikamd - thanks for the suggestion, it's a great idea. Unfortunately my XP doesn't want to accept your syntax. I wish I could offer something else, but my skills (ha!) are nonexistant. I'm embarassed to say that I had to refresh my memory on how to maneuver around command lines...
Got any other suggestions?
Thanks again for all your work!
the AziLink.ovpn file wont download for me.
works fine for me, GREAT WORK!
Okay, so I'm trying this out on a mac. I've successfully built openvpn and have my tunneling device (/dev/tun0, /dev/tun1, etc.). I run the adb forward command and it starts the daemon successfully, I fire up azilink on the phone and it says it's waiting for the connection, I fire up openvpn and the phone changes to stating that it's connected. Openvpn does not exit out - it starts the tunnel - BUT in the logging it reports " ROUTE: problem writing to routing socket" twice (which oddly appears to be a non-fatal error to the application), and traffic is unable to flow. I'm guessing it's something about openvpn not correctly manipulating the darwin routing tables, but I've been unsuccessful thus far in figuring out the nature of the problem so I thought I'd check here.
I'm running the straight azilink openvpn config file, which means if I need any syntactical changes for darwin I haven't applied them. The openvpn documentation is not terribly good and I was unable to find any documentation of routing command differences for MacOS (if that's even the problem, of course).
Edit: I forgot to mention, I've been trying to ping known-good IPs by address to test the routing - after my first attempt at loading a web page failed I figured it best to remove name services from the possible list of problems. The bytes sent count was slowly incrementing (up to about 23K bytes in ten minutes of diagnosis), and the inbound count got up to about 900 bytes in the same period, so clearly *something* was getting through - unless those counters are counting all traffic into and out of the phone and just going over the cable - but I got no ping responses, no websites could load, and by all appearances from the terminal, no data was moving.
lindsayt said:
I'm running the straight azilink openvpn config file, which means if I need any syntactical changes for darwin I haven't applied them. The openvpn documentation is not terribly good and I was unable to find any documentation of routing command differences for MacOS (if that's even the problem, of course).
Edit: I forgot to mention, I've been trying to ping known-good IPs by address to test the routing - after my first attempt at loading a web page failed I figured it best to remove name services from the possible list of problems. The bytes sent count was slowly incrementing (up to about 23K bytes in ten minutes of diagnosis), and the inbound count got up to about 900 bytes in the same period, so clearly *something* was getting through - unless those counters are counting all traffic into and out of the phone and just going over the cable - but I got no ping responses, no websites could load, and by all appearances from the terminal, no data was moving.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The byte counters only include traffic that OpenVPN is forwarding, so something is making it over. Did you try changing the DNS server to either 192.168.56.1 or an external address like 4.2.2.2? OpenVPN on MacOS and Linux won't set the nameserver automatically.
Also, there's a bit of a problem with pinging. The app on the phone can't generate ICMP ping packets since it isn't running as root. When you send an ICMP ping, the phone translates it to a UDP ping, sends it, and translates the reply back to a ICMP ping. Unfortunately, probably about 50% of hosts don't reply to UDP pings. Some that I've tested with that do work are lfx.org and he.net.
I'll see if I can give it a quick test on a Mac sometime tomorrow.
EDIT: I managed to get it working, although T-Mobile's so-called "transparent" web proxy is barely working today so I was having trouble accessing websites without getting errors. SSH was working fine, though. Anyway, here's what I did:
1- Installed a MacOS port of OpenVPN called Tunnelblick (didn't have XCode handy to compile my own and it's got a pretty GUI)
2- Copied azilink.ovpn to /users/azi/library/openvpn or whatever it is
3- Click the Tunnelblick icon in the upper-right, go to details, click "set nameserver"
4- Remove the TCP_NODELAY line because it was complaining that my kernel didn't support it (and would cause my connection to timeout after about 30 seconds).
5- Clicked connect
If you want to see what traffic's going over openvpn, you can just run "sudo tcpdump -n -i tun0"
wow ... this works great ... tested using a german G1 under linux (arch 686), win vista (x64) & win xp (x86) ... pretty good speed and low latency (actually i can't notice any latency at all - no mather if using wlan or 3g)!
GREAT WORK!!!
https://market.android.com/details?id=com.galoula.LinuxInstall
New every thing. Redesign of everything every where, rewite of all English parts, many bug fixes.
What for ? install Debian using debootstrap in chroot, and use your Android device like if you had installed Linux on a standard computer.
Bugs shall be reported to [email protected] .
Misc questions about how to use and feature request and general discussions to [email protected]
Market description:
This application will allow you to install a complete Debian distribution in your Android device. Based on chroot, it will perform a standard debootstrap and install a legacy Debian so that you can install, and run any classic Linux command, tool, daemon or service.
The package has few limitations; it is not restricted to Debian; we already offer the choice to use Ubuntu, and will add more distributions in close future. Each distribution is available in several tastes (stable, testing ...). It will not require to reboot; chroot is run inside Android. Installation can be done on any storage device, either on SD card, or inernal memory; no need to repartition any thing, run mkfs or fdisk. We do with what you let use. If you have almost nothing, the package will manage with almost nothing; if you can afford for a large ext4 partition on your SD card, the package will be happy to use it.
It will allow you to install all classic LAMP services like Apache, MySql, PHP, Samba, Netatalk, or just any classic Linux tool like vim, xterm, aterm, Abiword, Firefox, dillo, wget, cron, Perl, Python ... just everything.
Package utilisation will require a rooted device.
Reasons to install this package can not be listed. Just too many: want a cron daemon ? want to have gcc inside your phone ? want to recompile some kernel driver because the legacy Android driver for your Wi-Fi card has is bogus or limited ? want to use vim, or the real full featured desktop ls, ip, nmap, or top commands ? this package will give you all this for free, and much much more.
Requierments:
- an Android device based on some Linux kernel
- a rooted environment
- 300M free space
That's all.
Optionnal registration on our website, http://android.galoula.com/LinuxInstall/Register.php , will allow you to use advanced management features, and install package from within the application interface. You will not need to type any strange command in any terminal. And you will be able to make some services start automaticly at phone boot, and/or application start.
Online documentation: http://android.galoula.com/en/LinuxInstall/
Quick installation guide: http://android.galoula.com/en/LinuxInstall/QuickTutorial.html
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Free space must be on sd-card or phone memory?
Both accepted You choose where to install.
500M by default on SD card using loop method (on ext2 or fat). Down to 180M using the directory method (does not work on FAT).
thanks for this man.
Sorry if this is a noob question but will this in any way brick/soft brick my device?
Sent from my GT540RR using XDA App
Yes, it can.
But this app is underdevelopment since almost two years, and nobody ever bricked yet. I have written a very long complete tutorial, where I say what you should NOT do. I could easily tell you how to brick in 5 steps.
But we have been working very hard on default settings, to make default settings as much safe as possible.
There are many bugs, many known bugs; but 99.999% bugs will just make the chroot not work. Data loss is very rare. Data loss was highly probable in previous version 3.2 . But default settings are now safer. And if you do not do what we claim to be dangerous ... you are safe.
The most frequent case with 3.2 was complete wipe of /sdcard and /data . This have been fixed.
We never ran into wipe of /system until now. Never bricked.
And since Galoula and me are working on it, we are the most exposed ones. We test every single feature, in all possible situations. And when we find a wipe case, we repro it dozen time until we understand why, and how to fix, so that it won't happen to YOU.
3.3 is way safer than 3.2. And nobody reported wipe on 3.2 ...
But if you blindely clik any where, yes it can. And if I tell you where to click, you can brick in 5 steps for sure And it won't be a soft brick. I promise a good real brick where even HTC will be in trouble to repair it It's explained in the tutorial.
Wow. Thanks for the reply. At least i have an idea now. Is the tut on the app itself? I'll nake sure to read it very carefully coz i wanna learn all about this stuff
Sent from my GT540RR using XDA App
A not so short tuto is inside; but since most mobile devices have only one screen, you may want to read the online tuto on your computer: http://android.galoula.com/en/LinuxInstall/
Default settings are safe. Just follow the guide.
Will go ahead and read this tut. I'll make sure to give feedback. Thanks for paying attention to this noob
Sent from my GT540RR using XDA App
this is just great, are there any videos or screen shots?
edit: nevermind i just checked the market
Feel free to send us screen shots; I am not good at doing that (i can to shots, but I don't know what could be nice to upload).
We would apreciate shots of working (of course ) VNC clients connected to server running localy, or local consoles (like Connectbot) doing funny things.
Send to support. Thanks.
Spent the whole weekend on this...
I'm trying o get an X- GUI on the Samsung Captivate, (hope i said that right) like Ubuntu so i can VNC to a linux desktop environment. I'm on FASTY and wondering why I keep running into refusal of connection. I have the password and localhost as well as the port correct. I've lost sleep on making this work. Can anyone help...?
You question is somehow off topic.
You seem to have a basic VNC connexion issue.
Could not help without deeper description. And I rarely use VNC, i have very low experience.
First point: do you have free space in the distro ? depending on installation method, and what you installed, you may have run out of disk space (especially Ubuntu, uses lot more than Legacy Debian).
The distribution manager is still beta AOT. It may report the VNC service to be up and running, when it could not rally run. First thing to check is: is it up ?
- from local machine, to ps, and check if process is up
- from remote machine, just scan your IP for the device. VNC should be port 5800 or 5900, forgot which one.
Your VNC password is *NOT* your distribution password. VNC password need to be set at a different place (this is VNC specific; VNC is not UNIX, and never claimed to be fully a *UNIX "merged" service*).
Never used VNC in LinuxInstaller. Never yet. Not enough time to test it. We take report, and will test only major and frequent issues. We have many "easy success" reports, so, we don't worry about it. We have much more issues about rooting (getting root on phone), and starting debootstrap; this is what we focus on.
Make sure you have enough free space (at least 50M free left), then join any Debian or Ubuntu forum. They will ask you if you have a CLI; you shall use either adb shell, or connectbot. Fact you are in a chroot is not an issue, chrooting is not frequent for debian users, chrooting is the normal procedure to install Gentoo; and all debootstrap users use chroot daily; forums should not reject you for this reason. As long as you have a CLI.
Good luck.
Lost me fast...
Sorry..but you lost me, and FAST! I really don't have the terminology down...but I do have the Linux 3.3 Installer running properly...it indicates so. I was assuming that this would allow me to somehow load Ubuntu on my Captivate..as I've seen on some screen shots...I guess I'm just lost...a little knowledge is dangerous...I have a little. Just enough to accomplish the basics..but the vernacular is LOST to me. Guess I'll have to wait for the Ubuntu apk...thanks for trying...
I've got this errors...(see attached files).
I have busybox 1.19, connectbot and the superuser (v2.3.6.3 and su binary v2.3.2, the latest from the maket)...
What can I do?
you guys are still lucky.your able to make it work...
im running the ongoing cm7 2.3.5 on moto defy...
kernel is not supporting this yet.
hailmary what's missing in your kernel ? I don't know any Android that won't have ext2 in; if you have an Android without any ext2 filesystem, please contact me in private, I know it could be done, and I would be VERY CURIOUS to see how HTC did it.
If you are missing loop support in kernel, try block or directory method. Blocck will require ext2; directory won't (but will work only over ext FS ... so ... unless you can use NFS )
dugryce , ScumpinatoS, I will come back later (maybe today, maybe not).
ScumpinatoS said:
I've got this errors...(see attached files).
I have busybox 1.19, connectbot and the superuser (v2.3.6.3 and su binary v2.3.2, the latest from the maket)...
What can I do?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Reading the first message, you as, as said, a CPU issue. What's your CPU ? device model ?
run in some console:
uname -a
which tail
Application could not load viable environment to work; it is an issue, but it can be fixed. I can help digging, but I won't give you any solution. Send an email to Galoula; the bug report system via the console should work for you.
doublehp said:
Reading the first message, you as, as said, a CPU issue. What's your CPU ? device model ?
run in some console:
uname -a
which tail
Application could not load viable environment to work; it is an issue, but it can be fixed. I can help digging, but I won't give you any solution. Send an email to Galoula; the bug report system via the console should work for you.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have a Huawei Ideos CPU: MSM7225 without GPU.
I am use it and try install Ubuntu Natty but after download all deb package i get error installation, "issue binary, try other version"
Can someone help me what distro (Ubuntu/Debian) and what version of it that have installed succesfully.. please...
Sent from my GT-S5570 using XDA App
Hello XDA Developers, I have a Debian subsystem of sorts on my phone which is created by an application called Lil' Debi. For those of you unfamiliar with it, it essentially creates a Debian install on an .iso that can be mounted onto the disk. Once mounted, a user can access a shell to interact with this Debian subsystem by running /debian/shell as root, which will chroot to its own directory system separate system accessible from the Android Terminal.
Within this Debian subsystem I have created a non-root user account for the purpose of running a few networking applications that if compromised for some reason, won't give the attacker root privileges to break everything on my phone. There's only one small problem with this setup: I can't access the internet from a non-root account.
Both my terminal emulator and Lil' Debi have full network access, even when not run as root. I am curious then, why a non-root user account should have an incapability of accessing the network. A sample of wget on my phone using Google's IP address (I use the IP address because it cannot do DNS lookup obviously) gives a Permission Denied error. At the current moment I am not sure whether this problem lies with Android or with Debian. Does the user need to be explicitly granted permissions to use the network through Debian, or is the application somehow only able to access the network if it's root?
Additional information: The ROM used is PAC ROM, so you can assume any settings changes that could be made from Cyanogenmod or Paranoid Android can be made if necessary. The phone itself is a Oneplus One. No I don't have invites, so don't bother asking.
Opinions on the matter?
Also, on an unrelated note, g++ will only run under root. If I launch it as a non-root user, it will tell me that execvp failed because cc1plus doesn't exist. Why?
Thread's fallen onto the third page, so I'm going to bump.
One day has passed, and no help offered. Bump again.
Another bump. I thought XDA was supposed to be the most knowledgeable forum on Android.
Daily bump until this problem is solved...
Still bumping...
I hope people aren't just looking at the number of replies and assuming it's resolved...
Bumping again. At least 100 people have seen this thread, and not a single one has anything to say.
Bump again. It's now been a week since I asked this question.
Bump.