Does any1 know an app for the mda/xda witch can scramble the sound something like this windows prog: AC Voice Change 3.0 www.audio4fun.com
no1?
no1?
without being sure then i think that the phone part of the pda bypass the os pretty much which is why you can answer a call even though the pda is disabled by a password
also scrample handled in software would cause a delay because even though our cpu's in pda's today are around 400Mhz that dont mean they are as fast a 400Mhz cpu's in computers
Rudegar said:
would cause a delay because even though our cpu's in pda's today are around 400Mhz that dont mean they are as fast a 400Mhz cpu's in computers
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
hnnn??? thats like saying your 2005 mustang going at 100 km/hr will be faster than a 1990 mustang going at the same speed???
dude speed like frequency is STANDARDISED!
zohaer21 said:
Rudegar said:
would cause a delay because even though our cpu's in pda's today are around 400Mhz that dont mean they are as fast a 400Mhz cpu's in computers
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
hnnn??? thats like saying your 2005 mustang going at 100 km/hr will be faster than a 1990 mustang going at the same speed???
dude speed like frequency is STANDARDISED!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
STANDARDISED? bull****, dude you are soo wrong.
no, it's like saying a bus with a 3 litre engine can't go as fast as a sports car with a 3 litre engine. They both have the same size engine, but one has to do more work to attain the same speed.
yeah Mhz is pointless when it comes to measuring speed
i could make a cpu should i want to which could run 1Ghz but still be slower then a 1Mhz chip
it's going the other way which can be somewhat troublesome
a good example is amd vs. intel where amd use odd numbering to show how fast their chips are compared to intels which run at a higher pace
litle of topic here so its not possible -> wierd
Actually there is a method to do this ....
I tried doing this using my pc and it was some what succesful. You need the following components:
- A PC :?
- A bluetooth adapter with audio profile support
- A Mic
- A Voice Changing Software, I used my own soundcard's software to do this.
First thing u should do is pair ur pc with ur phone and set ur pc as the default headset for ur phone.
Second, attach a normal mic to ur pc. Make sure that ur mic is the only enabled recording device by modifying the volume control applet on ur pc.
3rd, set ur software's audio input device to ur Wave-In sound card and ur software's audio output to Wave-Out bluetooth audio. By doing this, the software will process all audio incoming from the mic and will route all audio to ur bluetooth device and back to ur phone.
So basically u'll be hearing the other caller's voie on ur pc speakers and u'll be using ur pc's mic instead of ur phone's mic.
I have personally tried this and I got very interesting results. U should try it. Good luck.
Confirmed....
The previously mentioned method works 100%
thanks m8!
Related
wm5 version:
http://download.msi.com.tw/support/swr_exe/cmu_swr/MSI_PPC50_0510.exe
wm2003 version:
http://download.msi.com.tw/support/swr_exe/cmu_swr/MSI_PPC42_0509.exe
open the software, swith your headset to pairing mode, and select option -select device- refresh- ok
and then add sounds and enjoy.
but there is such a pity that Blueplayer doesn't support headset other than MSI headset. It can only play 30 second per music.. Seems it has an MAC limited, hope someone will make a crack soon.
If this is true, then it might be possible to reverse the app and rip out the bluetooth record and create a new generic profile..
Does the music play on any headset for 30 seconds? If so, that should be quite easy to crack.
V
any headset except the MSI headset
So any headset works for 30 seconds?
V
yes you r right
I had test the programme with my i tech clip s35,it only could play 30s.it there any crack file?
waiting for the crack!
any cracks now? or anybody has a plan to crack this?
waiting
I'm looking at the program right now. A couple of things: Wow, it's big at 3MB! I noticed two files, CHS.dll and TW.dll. My guess is that these are additional language files for Chinese and Taiwanese, considering the origin of the company. It may be safe to remove it, saving 2MB!
If you can't get the program to launch properly, and it comes up with an "MPOBCE: !pl2CAPLoad. 1062" error message, you have to perform a soft-reset and try again.
In theory, if you're looking for a 30-second time-limit, a simple hexidecimal string you could be looking for is "1E 00." Of course, the file is replete with this string, so it could just be a matter of time until you find the right one. Once you do find the right one, you could change it to "FF FF" meaning 65,535. That will make the time limit 65,535 seconds = 1,092 minutes = 18.20 hours time allotted per playback. Sounds feasible?
I have a Bluespoon AX2, but no Bluetooth Stereo Headset, and it doesn't seem to want to pair it. It detects it during the scan/refresh, but there's nothing I can do afterwards, can't enter a PIN or anything.
Blueplayers time limit for non MSI headphones
BeyondtheTech wrote:
In theory, if you're looking for a 30-second time-limit, a simple hexidecimal string you could be looking for is "1E 00."
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That sure is too simple. Who says that it isn't 31 secs or min/60 or hr/3600. That would result in different codes.
I checked the disassembled code but didn't come further than turning off the popup bubbling: "This player is only for MSI-headsets". No clue where the limit is coded (but on the other hand: I'm not asm expert).
The real hardore coding boyz should be able to make a workaround. But maybe there is no interest.
All in all there is the question what BluePlayer makes better than WMP.
Blueplayers time limit for non MSI headphones
BeyondtheTech wrote:
In theory, if you're looking for a 30-second time-limit, a simple hexidecimal string you could be looking for is "1E 00."
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That sure is too simple. Who says that it isn't 31 secs or min/60 or hr/3600. That would result in different codes.
I checked the disassembled code but didn't come further than turning off the popup bubbling: "This player is only for MSI-headsets". No clue where the limit is coded (but on the other hand: I'm not asm expert).
The real hardore coding boyz should be able to make a workaround. But maybe there is no interest.
All in all there is the question what BluePlayer makes better than WMP.
Re: Blueplayers time limit for non MSI headphones
DTR said:
BeyondtheTech wrote:
In theory, if you're looking for a 30-second time-limit, a simple hexidecimal string you could be looking for is "1E 00."
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That sure is too simple. Who says that it isn't 31 secs or min/60 or hr/3600. That would result in different codes.
I checked the disassembled code but didn't come further than turning off the popup bubbling: "This player is only for MSI-headsets". No clue where the limit is coded (but on the other hand: I'm not asm expert).
The real hardore coding boyz should be able to make a workaround. But maybe there is no interest.
All in all there is the question what BluePlayer makes better than WMP.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Any expert cracked this software?? I'm very desirous to find out a solution for my 818pro. Thxxxxx
I dunno... despite having to convert everything to wma and wmv... I can't complain about WMP.
Jed - the piece they're interested in is the apparent 'A2DP' profile. A2DP allows for, among other, stereo audio to bluetooth audio devices. The default profile with Windows Mobile doesn't allow this. It was present in a Qtek test ROM, but it was removed again for the final AKU2 ROM. It may be back in AKU2.2 once whatever issues they found are addressed.
Overall...
If you're not using a bluetooth audio device, you won't care
If you do, but it's a mono device, you won't care
If you do, and it's stereo, but you don't care about stereo sound - duh
Has anyone been able to get this working on a Wizard? I have an Imate KJAM and since Imate is retarded and ripped the A2DP support out of their lastest firmware update, I am still looking for a stereo bluetooth solution.
I tried installing it and it seems to run ok, but after I pair it with my stereo bluetooth headset and press the PLAY button, nothing much happens, my headset LED changes to paired mode, but the time counter doesn't start incrementing and I get no audio. Not sure if it's my Bluetooth Stereo headphones or the KJAM. Any ideas?
I also try this program in my eten m500 & It's work.
However I think this 30 second problem 's not the limit of time. It's limit of song's length. since I try to play my ringtones that shorter than 30 second continously 3-4 song ( It mean 2-3 min.). It can run without any error. The error will be shown when any song run to 00.31
Paladin27 , I think you have to check in option- select device , I think your bluetooth device still not in the list.
ZeBoxx said:
Jed - the piece they're interested in is the apparent 'A2DP' profile.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Um, I know. I was wondering why people seem so adamant to NOT use WMP when it seems to do the job just fine with an updated BT stack.
Headset: Motorola S9-HD
ROM: Haykuro 6.0
Radio: ota-radio-2_22_19_26I
Issue: a2dp audio skips due to location of phone... or so it seemed. The audio would skip if the phone was placed across my body from the antenna or in a pocket.
Resolution: I began researching the bluez stack and found several places in the code that alluded to the hfp and a2dp being intertwined. This lead me to remember that android also attempts to switch between the hfp and a2dp for incoming calls.
I found that my headset was connected by default with both profiles active (not one at a time).
Thus after several test i found that disabling the hfp will eliminate the skipping.
Explanation: My best analysis is that the phone is keeping both profiles open at the expense of splitting the channel. Thus when the phone has gsm related events (incoming calls, tower hopping, background edge data) it is tying up the hfp by error thus causing a2dp to get reduced resources, low signal strength, and possibly packet collisions. Try for yourself. The skipping instantly stopped for me. Let me know how it goes for you! Thanks to all the devs for these great roms and info.
can i get an english translation lol jk...can u explain it in noob form
interesting, plausible explanation
where in the code do you make the change?
noob translation: turning off the headphone profile possibly frees up room for audio to stream uninterrupted...
ps. that might still confuse some... lol
alapapa said:
interesting, plausible explanation
where in the code do you make the change?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
no changes were made yet... the bluez stack is written to have a bridge between a2dp and headphone profile. i think android is sending packets to the headset via hfp for gsm events. I would think android should discard the packets instead of sending them out and relying on the headset to ignore them.
i would think the code can't be changed without making LOTS of other changes... i would be essentially rewriting how android handles the two profiles at the same time. (ALOT of work)
if this ends up fixing it for everyone... then i might look into trying to increase a2dp's priority in transmitting or some other solutions...
crushsuitandtie said:
no changes were made yet... the bluez stack is written to have a bridge between a2dp and headphone profile. i think android is sending packets to the headset via hfp for gsm events. I would think android should discard the packets instead of sending them out and relying on the headset to ignore them.
i would think the code can't be changed without making LOTS of other changes... i would be essentially rewriting how android handles the two profiles at the same time. (ALOT of work)
if this ends up fixing it for everyone... then i might look into trying to increase a2dp's priority in transmitting or some other solutions...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i think I gotcha...you just killed the hfp profile on your PC or w/e...?
Menu button>Settings>Wireless Controls>Bluetooth Settings>(long press) Your headset name>Options...>uncheck phone....
thanks for that tip. i was cutting my grass the other day. g1 in rear pocket. stereo bluetooth headphones on. signal kept cutting out on me. i'm gonna try this and see if it helps.
crazythunder said:
thanks for that tip. i was cutting my grass the other day. g1 in rear pocket. stereo bluetooth headphones on. signal kept cutting out on me. i'm gonna try this and see if it helps.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No problem. I'm just trying to add something constructive around here. I'm still not even close to some of these guys.
Hey you're right! I just connected my S9 to "media" only (disabling the phone connection in bluetooth settings) and it doesn't skip anymore, even with wifi on! I'm going to give this a try on my sony head unit in my car when I get the chance and I'll report back.
DOHCtor said:
Hey you're right! I just connected my S9 to "media" only (disabling the phone connection in bluetooth settings) and it doesn't skip anymore, even with wifi on! I'm going to give this a try on my sony head unit in my car when I get the chance and I'll report back.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Glad to hear that! im back at work and its heavily laced with wifi and the building gets poor edge/3G signal.So if you walk out the entrance toward the parking lot, the phone would connect to the cell towers (plus the wifi antennas are strong here) and my headphones would skip almost non-stop. This no longer happens. I'm quite happy.
Interresting hypothesis. I have my phone relatively close to my headphones so it hasnt been a big problem. Wifi had to be off or it didnt matter how close.
Eventhough it defeats the purpose of my S9's I'm going to give it a try.
atoy74 said:
Interresting hypothesis. I have my phone relatively close to my headphones so it hasnt been a big problem. Wifi had to be off or it didnt matter how close.
Eventhough it defeats the purpose of my S9's I'm going to give it a try.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i kept wi-fi off because I was in the gym or walking to my car... it would skip an absurd amount and i would nearly throw my phone and headset 8 blocks from pure frustration. The crazy part is BT is easily strong enough to transmit from a pocket to a headset on my head. I like to think i am tall but not that tall and disproportionate that my pocket is over 30 feet from my head! lol.
any skipping from that short of a distance is actually indicative of a problem to me. Thats like putting on a normal earpiece and getting nothing but static from that distance.
1) tests with my Sony Ericcson K850i showed it wasn't the headset....
2) i sat the phone on the floor directly under me when i was benchpressing, and simply because i layed down and partially covered the back of the headset the music started skipping non-stop. covering the antenna can cause some interferance but honestly with the phone that close it really shouldnt matter...
Tried the same test with my K850... no skipping. Tried with hfp disabled.... no skipping. Turn on hfp and a2dp... skips heavily.
thats the short version of how i came up with the split bandwidth part of my theory.
crushsuitandtie said:
no changes were made yet... the bluez stack is written to have a bridge between a2dp and headphone profile. i think android is sending packets to the headset via hfp for gsm events. I would think android should discard the packets instead of sending them out and relying on the headset to ignore them.
i would think the code can't be changed without making LOTS of other changes... i would be essentially rewriting how android handles the two profiles at the same time. (ALOT of work)
if this ends up fixing it for everyone... then i might look into trying to increase a2dp's priority in transmitting or some other solutions...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The handsfree profile will periodically send out "indicators" for things such as battery status and signal strength. These are small packets, which in a well designed Bluetooth stack, should not cause any disruption in the A2DP stream. The thing to look for would be how data transmission is prioritized. If, for example, BlueZ simply sends data in a "round robin" style, then sending a small data packet may delay the transmission of an A2DP streaming packet just enough to cause the problems you are describing.
I'm using JF1.51 and am not experiencing any of the audio problems you describe, even with WiFi and Handsfree connections enabled. I ran some tests and used a Bluetooth sniffer to capture the data traffic. One time I did hear an audio dropout at about the same time that the phone sent a signal strength indicator, which doesn't exactly validate your theory, but does make me wonder. However, I only saw 5 indicators sent by the phone over a 30 minute session.
Does using this method affect you from using the headset for calls?
Am I understanding that you would use this to listen to music... and if a call comes in would would talk over the handset normal?
What I've found is using A2DP indoors works perfectly (with our without HFP.) The explanation I've read is that the 2.4GHz waves bounce off the walls enhancing reception. Once outside is when I see degradation of quality/drops which would support the theory.
You might be on to something. If the bandwidth is being cut to share data over two profiles then, once you step outside, you'll have less distance before data packets drop.
paesano said:
I'm using JF1.51 and am not experiencing any of the audio problems you describe, even with WiFi and Handsfree connections enabled. I ran some tests and used a Bluetooth sniffer to capture the data traffic. One time I did hear an audio dropout at about the same time that the phone sent a signal strength indicator, which doesn't exactly validate your theory, but does make me wonder. However, I only saw 5 indicators sent by the phone over a 30 minute session.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
you might have misread one of my posts... what you descrribed is exactly what i was saying... gsm events are possibly clogging bandwidth for a2dp. the one time you heard it is what i am experiencing constantly in some areas.
it appears to be a combination of several factors that are somehow hitting some people all at once....
1)"gsm or phone events being broadcasted"
2) possible split BT channel for HFP and A2dp
3) weak overall BT signal strength from g1 (dialed down in drivers to save power?)
4) interference from other wifi sources (enterprise access points aka "High gain antennas")
P.S. I guess its obvious i'm a systems analyst... lol
this really does work!!!!
if you guys remember windows mobile , the BT stack by default is set with the bit pool min and max @ 31 ,it works great but the sound quality sucks.. if you use a registry editor and increase the max bit pool sound quality gets better, but if you go to high you would get the cliping that we now get . i used to do this with my wing , using this same S9 headphone ,the trick was not to go to high with max bitpool and to lower min to 12 and this worked great,, max was @ 46 min was @ 12 ,, no skipping at all.. and great sound . WE need to find a way to get these adjusted on android , this should fix
now i do believe the wing and G1 both use Broadcom stacks ,could be wrong>>
remember Schap's tools - Advanced Configuration this did the trick
crushsuitandtie said:
you might have misread one of my posts... what you descrribed is exactly what i was saying... gsm events are possibly clogging bandwidth for a2dp. the one time you heard it is what i am experiencing constantly in some areas.
it appears to be a combination of several factors that are somehow hitting some people all at once....
1)"gsm or phone events being broadcasted"
2) possible split BT channel for HFP and A2dp
3) weak overall BT signal strength from g1 (dialed down in drivers to save power?)
4) interference from other wifi sources (enterprise access points aka "High gain antennas")
P.S. I guess its obvious i'm a systems analyst... lol
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry, I must not have been very clear. I did understand what you were saying, and I confirmed seeing what you saw in the one dropout I heard. However, in my case, there were only 5 "GSM Events" during the duration of my test. Not really enough to cause a lot of trouble. I can see that if a lot of GSM events occur (The spec calls them indicators), then there could be a lot of errors. Perhaps this happens when the GSM signal is weak and constantly changing.
If you want to look at making changes to the Bluetooth software, here's my analysis of the 4 points above:
1) If a lot of indicators are being sent by the G1, then I can see that a Bluetooth stack implementation could have streaming audio problems if not properly implemented. Unfortunately, the only way to fix this problem is in software by only sending indicators (and any other data) "in between" the A2DP streaming packets. Streaming packets should never get delayed. It would be better to toss the streaming packet than to delay it.
2) When both HF and A2DP are connected, the signal is not actually split. They both have access to the full bandwidth of the Bluetooth stack. The only time that there would be a problem is when both are sending at the same time, which could cause an audio packet to get delayed in a transmit queue, causing a dropout (as described above). Perhaps BlueZ doesn't do a very good job of prioritizing data, so that audio data is never delayed by other data packets. In my opinion, #1 and #2 are the same problem.
3) A week BT signal would definitely cause this. I can reliably listen to stereo audio with my Sony headset at around 10-15 ft. Outside that range, I start to hear dropouts. Also, If I put my hands over the headset, I can cause dropouts at even 2 ft. So, your body will definitely cause problems if it gets in the way of the signal. Finally, the sensitivity of the radio on the headset will affect the range as well. It may or may not be possible to increase the TX power by sending the Bluetooth controller a command in the software. The only other solution is to try and not get in the way.
4) WiFi certainly can cause interference, as can a microwave oven. However, adaptive frequency hopping (AFH) should mitigate most problems. Perhaps AFH is not turned on for some reason, or there are multiple WiFi networks around, making it very difficult for the Bluetooth controller to find any reliable frequencies. AFH is turned on by sending the Bluetooth controller the command.
I am looking for an upgrade from the Universal. These two devices are looking about the closest (or the touch pro 2).
I use the universal without earphones or bluetooth, as a phone, is that possible with the 75x0? Or must you have an attachment?
(the universal had two dedicated speakers for mono 'phone' mode, and two others for stereo speakerphone).
you need attachment, you can't just use it as a phone (ie hold it to your ear) it gets real annoying for me.
To be honest, practically it can work as a phone even w/o any attachment. It has two stereo louder speakers and one microphone on its front panel. But the thing is that it does not have the speaker like in the regular phone - only louder speaking mode is available, therefore, everybody will hear you during your phone conversations. Or you should find out your "secret" place for talking with people.
BT or cord attachment can solve this problem and let you use this brick as a phone, but, believe me, you will forget about regular use...
This is real "another brick in the wall..."
Now I'm just trying to test this relation 7510 + cord headset replacing my Nokia E71 (just to test). Finally, I'm sure that I will return to Nokia soon - it's absolutely impossible to use 7510 as a regular working phone for everyday use.
I'm using the X7500 and now X7510 since 3 years as phone and Im happy with. OK, you need a BT headset or BT carkit - but no other phone in the world can offer the features a X75xx has.
Dieter
dieterpapa said:
I'm using the X7500 and now X7510 since 3 years as phone and Im happy with. OK, you need a BT headset or BT carkit - but no other phone in the world can offer the features a X75xx has.
Dieter
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Interesting that someone would love to use the x75x0 as a regular phone. The more recent WM phones (Touch HD2, Toshiba TG01) being hailed have screens almost as big as the x75x0. When I read their users' wish list for these modern phones, they seem to be describing something like the x75x0. Something tells me that a re-release of the x7510 with some tweaks could be a winner! Desired improvements: 1GHz processor, WVGA (800x480) resolution, skin cover for the main device (without hardware keyboard).
rsawoseyin said:
Interesting that someone would love to use the x75x0 as a regular phone. The more recent WM phones (Touch HD2, Toshiba TG01)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
People think these screens are as big?
I have the universal, which is a 4" screen, and when I look at any phone in a shop at the moment, the size of the screen is much smaller.
I use my X7510 as a phone (and internet browser, agenda, tomtom and mp3 player)
The WM 6.5.3 interface is a huge improvement in the phone usefulness and that makes Windows mobile slowly getting to become a proper phone-software.
The contact images (the faces of your contacts) are of course still microscopic.
I live in one of the no cellphone while driving w/o a headset states, so I take my blueant z9i headset wherever I go anyway, so if youre the same then I'd say yes, it works perfectly and reliably as a phone, as well as an internet tablet, a messenger device, a audio-video player, an ebook reader, a GPS Navigator, an SNES emulator, (haven't tried the playstation emulator yet), as well as whatever else of the boatload of uses you can find for it.
Hi, I am trying to get my BMW bluetooth to work with TG01
only the phonebook transfer work correctly
Jetware 1.4 did not improve anything
Please help anyone has their TG01 working with BMW?
UPDATE 2010/03/29
a half solution is to start the car, then turn the BT on the phone, then it works perfect.
the reason why his is a HALF solution only: next time you start the car you have to start BT on the phone again ( I am used to have my BT working 24/7 )
a_petrov303 said:
Hi, I am trying to get my BMW bluetooth to work with TG01
only the phonebook transfer work correctly
Jetware 1.4 did not improve anything
Please help anyone has their TG01 working with BMW?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You could always buy a more expensive phone to go with that expensive accessory
Only joking
a_petrov303 said:
Hi, I am trying to get my BMW bluetooth to work with TG01
only the phonebook transfer work correctly
Jetware 1.4 did not improve anything
Please help anyone has their TG01 working with BMW?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not BMW, but I have it working perfectly paired with my Ford car system. So I'd suspect is most likely a settings isue one side or the other rather than anything fundamental.
well I have noticed that it works well with newer idrive models, but mine is 2005 MY so no idrive and no luck
ive also heard alot of complaints like this ... not being able to read phonebook
ill try today in 2008 toyota
souljaboy said:
ive also heard alot of complaints like this ... not being able to read phonebook
ill try today in 2008 toyota
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
or no, the phone book is excellent
it is not being able to call or receive calls what bothers me
and as I said, it works with newer iDrive BMW
oh , calling/recieve works for me .. radio fades out and its good
maybe u should try bmw forum ?
souljaboy said:
oh , calling/recieve works for me .. radio fades out and its good
maybe u should try bmw forum ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, I have tried 2 bmw forums, but they do not know about WM 6.5 much
this is my first WM phone, all the other phones worked in the same car.
I managed now to get sms to show on the screen of the car, but calls is more important
people here in HD2 forum said they exange some big (5-6 digits) number in the registry and it works for them, but I am pesimistic about this because they have different BT stack, right?
HD2 - widcomm
TG01 - MS
well it never hurts to try , just make sure u can undo it .. tho if the regkey contains "htc" somwhere it most def wont work
I have downloaded a utility for enabling rSAP profile on our phone - it did not help...I then disabled the rSAP and a miracle!!!
I managed to place 2 calls already. I hope on next connection with the car it will still work
what is this miracle program which lets you enable the rSAP? I need it too!!
youbrokeit said:
what is this miracle program which lets you enable the rSAP? I need it too!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
search this forum "rSAP"...but before you do a short update:
of course on next connection, nothing worked ...and I have updated to the new rom and did not install rSAP and I was able to obtain the same result...this means it has nothing to do with my previous success
this situation is driving me grazy already...I do not know why sometimes i can get it to work perfectly by just switching BT on and off.
today i have wasted many hours just turning it on and off trying to find the rule, working combination - so far it seems to work at random
and if I get it to work it works for the next call and the next...until I get out of the car. when I start the car again it does not work r-r-r...how can I take a "snapshot" of the phones state when it is working and somehow replicate this state every other time I am in the car?!!
please help me
try resetting ur phone , sometimes it wont pair with my bt headset nomatter what i do but a phone softreset fixes it
souljaboy said:
try resetting ur phone , sometimes it wont pair with my bt headset nomatter what i do but a phone softreset fixes it
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
a SR does indeed fix it, but only until next disconnect...when I came to the next day it is the same story again
I refuse to believe that this just a normal thing for WM (although having for the last couple of years only blackberries, I miss their stability and auto on/off function) ...even WM cannot be THAT glitchy
anyone?
I think I am onto something here:
if the BT is switched on after I start the car, everything works perfect!
the only inconvinience now is switching BT on/off for each jorney (especially annoying during short trips with short stops - to the local shop, post office etc)
hey guys,
i've searched the last few hours if it is possible to use your phone as a bluetooth jammer, found nothing, only extra devices which cost very much..
As a technic noob I ask myself if it would it be possible to create an app which sends some frequency crap to interrupt the bluetooth signal..? Is a smartphone powerful enough to work as a bluetooth jammer?
I would be very glad if a pro can answer to my thread and write if its possible.
greetings from Germany
Bump... I need this program too for jamming JBL speakers in bus.
Hah, i just search for same.. Some dickhead turned vol. On max. At quiet beach..
it is possible with an external wifi adapter like tp link or alfa and kali nethunter installed on your phone it requires a certain kernel to work and the phone must be rooted.
the built in phone antenna doesnt support packet injection and deauthentication thats why you use an externel wifi card.