Listen to live FM broadcasts on devices that don't have a built-in FM radio!
Description
SDR Touch turns your mobile phone or tablet into a cheap and portable software defined radio scanner. Allows you to listen to live on air FM radio stations, weather reports, police, fire department and emergency stations, taxi traffic, airplane communications, audio of analogue TV broadcasts, audio amateurs, digital broadcasts and many more! Depending on the hardware used, its radio frequency coverage could span between 50 MHz and 2.2 GHz. It currently demodulates WFM, AM, NFM, USB, LSB, DSB, CWU and CLW signals.
You can get a compatible USB receiver for under $20 online from eBay. Just plug in your rtl-sdr compatible USB DVB-T tuner into your Android device using a USB OTG Cable and turn on SDR Touch. For list of supported Realtek RTL2832U based dongles, please see the end of the description.
Compatible USB DVB-T tuners
- Generic RTL2832U (e.g. hama nano)
- ezcap USB 2.0 DVB-T/DAB/FM dongle
- Terratec Cinergy T Stick Black (rev 1)
- Terratec NOXON DAB/DAB+ USB dongle (rev 1)
- Terratec Cinergy T Stick RC (Rev.3)
- Terratec T Stick PLUS
- Terratec NOXON DAB/DAB+ USB dongle (rev 2)
- PixelView PV-DT235U(RN)
- Compro Videomate U620F
- Compro Videomate U650F
- Compro Videomate U680F
- Sweex DVB-T USB
- GTek T803
- Lifeview LV5TDeluxe
- MyGica TD312
- PROlectrix DV107669
- Zaapa ZT-MINDVBZP
- Twintech UT-40
- Dexatek DK DVB-T Dongle (Logilink VG0002A)
- Dexatek DK DVB-T Dongle (MSI DigiVox mini II V3.0)
- Dexatek Technology Ltd. DK 5217 DVB-T Dongle
- MSI DigiVox Micro HD
- Genius TVGo DVB-T03 USB dongle (Ver. B)
- GIGABYTE GT-U7300
- DIKOM USB-DVBT HD
- Peak 102569AGPK
- SVEON STV20 DVB-T USB & FM
Interaction with battery savers
It turns out some manufacturers such as Huawei and Samsung have very aggressive power saving policies and force close background apps without notice. If the system decides to kill the RTL-SDR (or SdrPlay) driver while SDR Touch is running, the app will stop playing and become unresponsive eventually showing a "Disconnected unexpectedly" error message.
If you are experiencing this issue, the only solution that currently exists is to manually whitelist *both* the SDR driver app and SDR Touch in your phone's power saving settings to prevent the operating system from unexpectedly stopping the apps. More information and instructions on how to do this based on your particular phone make and model can be found on this website: dontkillmyapp.com
Feedback
An article about SDR Touch - Android Meets the RTL2832U from HamRadioScience
A user submitted video showing off advanced features of SDR Touch running on a mobile phone:
Any additional feature suggestions, comments or feedback will be much appreciated!
looking good sir looking good
Fantastic work. I am excited to see squelch on the list of improvements. Is there any chance that you will ever support a plugin architecture or P25 decoding? There is a decoder called DSD which can decode P25. Squelch+P25 would make it replace my scanner entirely. I would pay additional $$ for each of these features and it would still be more affordable and interesting than carrying around a scanner.
daniel_reetz said:
Fantastic work. I am excited to see squelch on the list of improvements. Is there any chance that you will ever support a plugin architecture or P25 decoding? There is a decoder called DSD which can decode P25. Squelch+P25 would make it replace my scanner entirely. I would pay additional $$ for each of these features and it would still be more affordable and interesting than carrying around a scanner.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for the support! Squelch is coming soon! I will look into P25 but we might need to work together on this - you may need to provide me some I/Q recorded samples - but I would say this would be a bit later since I just started my second semester and have some studying to do as well
P.S. Squelch is now on top of my TODO list
Although this seems to be a great app, I couldn't make it to work with Xperia Ray... ("no tuner found" error)
Anyone here had success with making it work on a Xperia phone?
martintzvetomirov said:
Thanks for the support! Squelch is coming soon! I will look into P25 but we might need to work together on this - you may need to provide me some I/Q recorded samples - but I would say this would be a bit later since I just started my second semester and have some studying to do as well
P.S. Squelch is now on top of my TODO list
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Fanastic, thank you. I can't wait for squelch!
I'll supply whatever data/info you need to implement P25. I/Q samples are no problem. I understand completely that your time is limited and there is a larger audience to serve, but if you need resources, please let me know what you need and I'll see how I can help.
My account here is new, so I can't post links, but "DSD" and "radioreference wiki" will get you to the DSD source.
Amazing work! Well worth the $9.99USD pricetag. Gave you a nice review on the Google Market/Play Store as well.
FYI: Works wonderfully on an Acer A500 w/ Android 4.2.1.
SDR Touch has been removed by Google from Google Play! I will investigate the issue and will report back as soon as I have more information!!!
If somebody needs the latest version of SDR Touch, please download it from the attachment. Keep in mind that as soon as SDR Touch goes back to Android market you might need to reinstall it in order to get the latest updates!
Ok, just to make it clear for everybody that is concerned.
SDR Touch DOES NOT violate the GPL license!
SDR Touch is merely a client for - https://github.com/martinmarinov/rtl_tcp_andro-. rtl_tcp_andro is released under GPL2+. SDR Touch and rtl_tcp_andro are separate works in the sense of GPL. They are neither statically or dynamically linked and they are two separate executables that communicate over a TCP connection. rtl_tcp_andro is bundled with SDR Touch merely to help the user and with accordance to point 2. of GPL Terms and Conditions. You can think of SDR Tocuh as an "installer" of rtl_tcp_andro. It just launches rtl_tcp_andro with Runtime.exec("");. Furthermore SDR Touch could happily work without the bundled rtl_tcp_andro in network mode by connecting to a remote computer running either rtl_tcp_andro or the original rtl_tcp.
Therefore GPL is not violated. Saying that GPL is violated would be like saying that you can't listen to online radio with your proprietary music player because the radio is being streamed with a GPL based software.
A quote from GPL-3.0:
A compilation of a covered work with other separate and independent works, which are not by their nature extensions of the covered work, and which are not combined with it such as to form a larger program, in or on a volume of a storage or distribution medium, is called an "aggregate" if the compilation and its resulting copyright are not used to limit the access or legal rights of the compilation's users beyond what the individual works permit. Inclusion of a covered work in an aggregate does not cause this License to apply to the other parts of the aggregate.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Did you read that quote ?
... and which are NOT combined with it such as to form a larger program, in or on a volume of a storage or distribution medium ...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
A single .APK _is_ a single distribution medium ... and they definitely _ARE_ combined to form a larger program. The "SDR Touch" .APK is the larger program, containing both your own code and the rtl_tcp_andro binary. That clause is meant for when you ship a CDRom with different stuff on it for example where they have no special relation ship. Here the relation ship and dependency is clear (even says so in the damn description of the app)
The problem is not with SDR Touch or the way it's a client for a rtl_tcp version, that's the right way to do it.
The problem is that both are distributed bundled.
SDR Touch and rtl_tcp_andro need to be two separate packages to be installed independently by the user.
There is also the requirement to make a written offer and include the full license terms when distributing rtl_tcp_andro, usual way is to include both the license in the .APK and also accessible to the user in the UI (menu often).
Cheers,
Sylvain
smunaut said:
Did you read that quote ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But rtl_tcp_andro is a separate binary and the apk is just a container like a CD Rom. That's precisely the point. The binary classes of SDR Touch are separate entities in the apk file and are not linked to rtl_tcp_andro!. The GPL allows using an "installer" to install proprietary software as well as GPLed software in one go. The Android apk installer grabs the contents of the archive (which is like a rar archive) and unrars it ("installs") it onto the device. When the user is using the program, the two entities are still different and separate!
The license is linked in the Help section of SDR Touch. The thing that I haven't done is to put the license physically on the apk as well.
But that's a good point,
Thanks,
Martin
martintzvetomirov said:
But rtl_tcp_andro is a separate binary and the apk is just a container like a CD Rom. That's precisely the point. The binary classes of SDR Touch are separate entities in the apk file and are not linked to rtl_tcp_andro!. The GPL allows using an "installer" to install proprietary software as well as GPLed software in one go. The Android apk installer grabs the contents of the archive (which is like a rar archive) and unrars it ("installs") it onto the device. When the user is using the program, the two entities are still different and separate!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Mmm, first, I'm not sure the APK is uncompressed on the flash.
But you're missing the point that in this case it's a single "application", no matter what binaries it's composed of. It's not pulled independently (as a dependency or not) and via that "installer" you can't get it independently, it's just a single package, even presented as a single application to the user (aren't they both under the same 'title' in the "Application" tab of android ?)
So really, I don't see how you could consider this as not being a "whole" without, like I said, distribute it as two different packages (which would also allow other "users" to use the rtl_tcp_andro for eg) and give a undeniable separation between the two.
smunaut said:
Mmm, first, I'm not sure the APK is uncompressed on the flash.
But you're missing the point that in this case it's a single "application", no matter what binaries it's composed of. It's not pulled independently (as a dependency or not) and via that "installer" you can't get it independently, it's just a single package, even presented as a single application to the user (aren't they both under the same 'title' in the "Application" tab of android ?)
So really, I don't see how you could consider this as not being a "whole" without, like I said, distribute it as two different packages (which would also allow other "users" to use the rtl_tcp_andro for eg) and give a undeniable separation between the two.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok, I see your point and this looks like an option. I still can argue that they are separate but in order to prove that, as you say, I might split them into two packages.
Will see how things go, will keep you posted!
Like smunaut said, this definitely counts as a derivative work as they are being presented to the user as one cohesive application via the Play Store.
This is the same problem that SDR# had some time back, where they tried to distribute the GPL RTL-SDR with their proprietary UI. They thought that, since the UI only communicated with RTL-SDR and wasn't technically part of SDR#, they could include it; but that's not the case. (http://dangerousprototypes.com/2012/08/05/confusion-over-sdr-vs-opensdrsharp/)
The solution in this case will be the same as it was for SDR#: Either make the entire application GPL, or break rtl_tcp_andro into a completely separate package. Make sure that the description for the rtl_tcp_andro package clearly states its license, and make sure you link to the GitHub page for it so the source is clearly available. That should cover all the bases.
MS3FGX said:
Like smunaut said, this definitely counts as a derivative work as they are being presented to the user as one cohesive application via the Play Store.
This is the same problem that SDR# had some time back, where they tried to distribute the GPL RTL-SDR with their proprietary UI. They thought that, since the UI only communicated with RTL-SDR and wasn't technically part of SDR#, they could include it; but that's not the case. (http://dangerousprototypes.com/2012/08/05/confusion-over-sdr-vs-opensdrsharp/)
The solution in this case will be the same as it was for SDR#: Either make the entire application GPL, or break rtl_tcp_andro into a completely separate package. Make sure that the description for the rtl_tcp_andro package clearly states its license, and make sure you link to the GitHub page for it so the source is clearly available. That should cover all the bases.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok, this makes sense.
Actually this won't be a bad idea after all, I mean if there is a separate app "rtl_tcp_andro" that can do I/Q samples, this might help other developers write their own SDR based applications so therefore help the community.
I don't want to release the processing bit under GPL since it took me quite some time to optimize the algorithms to run on Android so I want to keep my work with this private and this is what Pro users are paying for but rtl_tcp_andro is in the public domain anyways, I will just wrap it around with an apk and release it under GPL.
Please add NetSDR support for RFSpare radios like NetSDR or SDR-IP.
I would pay 10x the Pro price for this! http://sourceforge.net/projects/cutesdr/ and http://cutesdr.svn.sourceforge.net/...face/sdrinterface.cpp?revision=36&view=markup will probably reveal how NetSDR format works.
stejc said:
Please add NetSDR support for RFSpare radios like NetSDR or SDR-IP.
I would pay 10x the Pro price for this! http://sourceforge.net/projects/cutesdr/ and http://cutesdr.svn.sourceforge.net/...face/sdrinterface.cpp?revision=36&view=markup will probably reveal how NetSDR format works.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I already have sever requests about this. I will keep this idea in the record. I will first need to make sure SDR Touch is working properly and implement the list of features in the first post.
Also, I was able to rapidly prototype so far but now I'm back in University and I am forced to slow down the development speed. So it may take some time.
Any chance to make the whole app Open Source? This would be a nice recognition of the hard work done by the rtl-sdr folks, and solve your packaging problem.
I have licensed APRSdroid (which btw. can modulate and demodulate Packet Radio using audio in/out) under the GPL, and I can not complain about people not getting the paid version from Google Play.
To the contrary, 80% of my users actually bought the app, and all without evil nag screens!
martintzvetomirov said:
Actually this won't be a bad idea after all, I mean if there is a separate app "rtl_tcp_andro" that can do I/Q samples, this might help other developers write their own SDR based applications so therefore help the community.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Absolutely. That is the idea behind the GPL in the first place, that other developers can benefit from improvements made to the code. Having a separate download for rtl_tcp_andro would definitely be a positive for the community, I could personally think of a couple interesting projects with it.
martintzvetomirov said:
I don't want to release the processing bit under GPL since it took me quite some time to optimize the algorithms to run on Android so I want to keep my work with this private and this is what Pro users are paying for but rtl_tcp_andro is in the public domain anyways, I will just wrap it around with an apk and release it under GPL.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Of course, it's your right to keep your own software closed source. I don't personally believe in keeping this kind of software closed, but it's your decision.
Though I would like to point out that this type of software is going to get paid downloads either way. The type of users you will attract with this kind of software are the same kinds of users who have no problem donating to open source projects. We aren't talking about some casual game here that just anyone will be downloading, this is an application developed for more technical users who have a pretty good idea of the amount of effort that goes into a project like this.
In any event, I'm glad to see you taking the proper steps to make sure your software is GPL compliant.
FUNcube Pro & FUNcube Pro Plus Support
Any chance FUNcube Pro & FUNcube Pro Plus Dongles Support can be added in the future.
As most people know, the new Moto-X as well as the new Droid series will include two DSPs in addition to the main ARM SoC CPU. One is a "contextual processor" that handles sensor input, the other is a "natural language processore" that handles voice commands. Motorola's VP of Engineering said that without these DSPs the phone would need two extra batteries to handle the functionality for always-on voice recognition, wrist flick camera, always on notifications, etc.
Question - Is there going to be some sort of abstraction layer over DSP functions with an API accessible to apps running in Dalvik? That's the key question IMO. If so, this could be really big. If you need to write native code in C/ASM that's specific to each particular piece of hardware, then it's a dismal failure. Has any info on this been released?
there's a system dump of moto_x over in Android software forum, would be worth checking out but knowing moto their not going to make it that easy..
Sent from my DROID BIONIC using Tapatalk 2
Thom Holwerda at Real-Time Embedded OS specialized website OSnews reports about vulnerabilities that lurk in closed-sourced radio chips.
The second operating system hiding in every mobile phone
The insecurity of baseband software is not by error; it's by design. The standards that govern how these baseband processors and radios work were designed in the '80s, ending up with a complicated codebase written in the '90s - complete with a '90s attitude towards security. For instance, there is barely any exploit mitigation, so exploits are free to run amok. What makes it even worse, is that every baseband processor inherently trusts whatever data it receives from a base station (e.g. in a cell tower). Nothing is checked, everything is automatically trusted. Lastly, the baseband processor is usually the master processor, whereas the application processor (which runs the mobile operating system) is the slave.
(...)
With this in mind, security researcher Ralf-Philipp Weinmann of the University of Luxembourg set out to reverse engineer the baseband processor software of both Qualcomm and Infineon, and he easily spotted loads and loads of bugs, scattered all over the place, each and every one of which could lead to exploits - crashing the device, and even allowing the attacker to remotely execute code. Remember: all over the air. One of the exploits he found required nothing more but a 73 byte message to get remote code execution. Over the air.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Source, via HN
Comments at HN are also worth reading, I think.
Do note, that the study run on some old generation of MSM chips.
Here is a counter argument for instance:
Comment by OsQar
by OsQar on Wed 13th Nov 2013 09:51 UTC
I'm not a security expert at all, but I've been working on mobile radio access technologies for several years, so I feel quite confident to say that some or your claims are wrong. E.g:
"The standards that govern how these baseband processors and radios work were designed in the '80s, ending up with a complicated codebase written in the '90s - complete with a '90s attitude towards security."
Well, GSM's baseband was developed from late 80's to early 90's, UMTS' from late 90's to early 00's, and LTE's can be now be considered almost finished. I know that GSM is not secure at all now (it was when it was released, but now it has been cracked), but I'm not so sure about UMTS (CDMA is very hard to demodulate, so cracking is even worse) and LTE (OFDMA is quite a headache).
"What makes it even worse, is that every baseband processor inherently trusts whatever data it receives from a base station (e.g. in a cell tower). Nothing is checked, everything is automatically trusted."
This is NOT TRUE. At all. Even from GSM times. Handheld devices run a bunchload of ID checks to know what basestation is sending data; and basestations also carefully allocate and check mobile ID's. This is especially true in UMTS (where you have to discriminate interferring users by using pseudorandom codes) and LTE (where you even need angle-of-arrival information to reach more users).
So, I'm not claiming that mobile basebands are inherently secure, but they're definitively not based on 80's security technology.
On the other hand, I agree with your viewpoint that the closed implementations and the huge standards are not the best way to allow the community to check for security bugs. But manufacturers are the main supporters of actual standardization bodies, so it's quite complicated to fight against it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
To improve the security and efficiency of smartphones, Huawei has developed the new Kirin 650 chipset. Featuring silicon chip level security, the chipset ensures a reliable and secure interface for users.
Kirin 650 Specifications
The Kirin 650 comes with an advanced 16nm FinFET plus process technology that is integrated with octa-core CPU, Cortex A53 (4×1.7GHz + 4×2.0GHz), ARM’s Mali T830 GPU, LTE Cat.7 technology and an i5 coprocessor.
Why does your Smartphone need security?
Our smartphones are our most personal devices. Accumulated with personal messages, information, contacts and photos, our smartphones are also our most common way to check emails, social media accounts and transfer money through internet banking. There is, therefore, a need to keep all this data secure. The Kirin 650 comes with dedicated security mode (HiSEE) to ensure this user security.
Pseudo Base Station Defense Technology: Free of Fraud Calls and Junk Short Messages
Nowadays most phone users are harassed by calls from pseudo base stations. A base station is a fixed station in the mobile wireless network which acts as the transceiver with mobile phones. Now the count of pseudo base stations has been rising steadily in the Smartphone world.
These pseudo telecommunication base stations are irritating users by sending junk or fraud messages, fraud calls and by stealing personal information. This issue has not been solved for a long time but now Huawei has found a solution to provide more security to users from pseudo base station to avoid fraud calls and junk messages.
As a part of this, Huawei applies the pseudo base station defense technology to the Kirin 650 chipset. Pseudo base station defense technology is based on communication baseband processor (Baseband processor is a part of the chipset used in Smartphone that manages the communication process) and it is capable of identifying and rejecting the pseudo communications from fraud telecom.
Chip level HiSEE Security
The Huawei Kirin 650 is integrated with HiSEE security solution which helps in call encryption, secure mobile payment etc. The HiSEE security solution is designed to provide hardware and software data security of devices.
Many users use the fingerprint to unlock the device and make payments. It is, therefore, necessary to secure the fingerprint information. For security, the Kirin 650 provides Replay Protected Memory Block (RPMB gives a secure memory block to stores the critical or dedicated data) where all the dedicated fingerprint information gets stored.
To achieve the highest level of security the Kirin 650 is backed with the ARM TrustZone environment. This technology stores all data in an encrypted format and provides hardware level security. This means that if a phone is rooted or violently dismantled, the data will not be compromised.
Fingerprint sensor interfaces and driver programs are encapsulated in TEE OS so the fingerprint sensor cannot be directly accessed by any third-party application. Trusted Execution Environment (TEE) is a secured storage area in the main processor (CPU) which offers the high level of security. TEE offers isolated execution to provide end-to-end security and it is considered as the most secured application available.
Conclusion
The Huawei’s chipset Kirin650 is protected by the HiSEE security solution. HiSEE security solutions store all data in encrypted form to safeguard user information. The Kirin 650 also provides RPMB where all the dedicated data will be stored and the high-level security is achieved by ARM’s TrustZone. Pseudo base station defense technology based on communication baseband processor is capable of rejecting all the junk message and fraud call. All these security technologies integrated into Kirin 650 to deliver the highest level of security.
I see there has been a few mentions of TMC here and there on xda that haven't amounted to much, but I came across an old article elsewhere that discussed the possible inclusion in android. Although several years old it has a link to a basic linux based software decoder.
Link - h**tp://linux.downloadatoz.com/simple-rds-tmc-decoder/
No special hardware required (UK anyway) as RDS data is received anyway by android head units radio. It just needs filtering and injected into appropriate nav. No special hardware necessary and no need for special mcu access.
I'm sure anyone born later than 2000 will never have heard of TMC and would cite google or waze as a better alternative of info / data received over an internet stream anyway.
While this is true, the cons are
1, needs permanent reliable data connection
2, reliance on google apps / services.
3, subject to google (and others) spyware, personal location tracking.
4, possible heavy data use costs.
5, not easy to implement in a head unit, and relies on a dongle or smartphone
6, may have in app costs associated.
RDS TMC has none of these disadvantages. It is always on provided FM radio is receivable. For basic info / data It is completely free, although some providers offer extra services and charge.
It has been around and used for years in win ce based systems (before android) yet it seems to have lost favour to android based manufacturers and users. Is that I wonder because of its advantages, and big companies want people to switch to more chargeable services with personal data harvesting??
What are peoples thoughts...?
I would love to have rds working with this radio so I could get it working with some nav programs.