Related
[Q] Looking for "oasis6969" creator of "Linux XBMC 12.2 for g-box 2.1,2.2, and SLAV"
I am trying to track down a supposed member of xda who dropped into the G-Box forums back on August 18/19 and provided a download link for "Linux XBMC 12.2 for g-box 2.1,2.2, and SLAV". Since the original post, they have not come back. I've tested out the build, and I must say it is working awesome & wanted to thank them for their release, but have not made contact there nor can I find any user here by the handle "oasis6969".
Does anyone here know that person or someone else who could have released the build and then seemingly just vanished?
Details of the post are here:
http://matricom.net/forums/#/discus...for-g-box-2-12-2-and-slav-please-test-8192013
-Vathan
...shoot...meant to put that in Q & A...apologies
[EDIT] Thanks for moving it!
Well the cat came back to the forums, so this thread can be closed!
Vathan said:
I am trying to track down a supposed member of xda who dropped into the G-Box forums back on August 18/19 and provided a download link for "Linux XBMC 12.2 for g-box 2.1,2.2, and SLAV". Since the original post, they have not come back. I've tested out the build, and I must say it is working awesome & wanted to thank them for their release, but have not made contact there nor can I find any user here by the handle "oasis6969".
Does anyone here know that person or someone else who could have released the build and then seemingly just vanished?
Details of the post are here:
http://matricom.net/forums/#/discus...for-g-box-2-12-2-and-slav-please-test-8192013
-Vathan
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
here i am
radiohead7778580 said:
here i am
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No wonder I could not find you...your alias is not even close to oasis6969 here - LMAO.
-Vathan
So, what's up with this rom
http://rootmygalaxy.net/safely-update-oneplus-one-to-android-6-0-marshmallow/
I've installed it earlier, it looks like 6.0, but on device info it says 5.1.1. Anyone else have any experiences?
No, That is CM12.1 that is Anrdroid 5.1.1.. Keep checking XDA eventually a ROM will come up!
Of course it's a fake.
AOSParadox's effort to bring Marshmallow to our Bacon is being reported as if they have actually done a bootable build. Not yet, more work must be made, thats a fake
projeto56 said:
So, what's up with this rom
http://rootmygalaxy.net/safely-update-oneplus-one-to-android-6-0-marshmallow/
I've installed it earlier, it looks like 6.0, but on device info it says 5.1.1. Anyone else have any experiences?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Don't trust anything from that site. We've seen a lot of spam posts pointing there the last few days, but I wouldn't touch it with a ten foot pole.
*Sorry Guys!!!This is Not a Marshmallow ROM.Now we have tested it and it is still in Lollipop.Some guy gave us wrong info sorry for that.Keep Visiting we will Post the Marshmallow ROM Link Very Soon. - See more at: ://rootmygalaxy.net/safely-update-oneplus-one-to-android-6-0-marshmallow/#sthash.dOY8qT82.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Very reputable site. They posted it without even testing or doing any research, their source being "some guy" and they provide a direct link to aosparadox download, which is still up. Zero integrity, avoid these guys
Yeah, I haven't seen a single ROM yet except one really janky ROM that didn't even have a proper zip or working mobile networks lol
All sites have wrong download Link
I have searched For Marshmallow for OnePlus One and all top sites in the google search list have the same ROM download link.Its not only rootmygalaxy.net, but also sites like androiding.how and theandroidsoul.com which have the same link.There is no Marshmallow available for OPO right now.
IamAlexD said:
I have searched For Marshmallow for OnePlus One and all top sites in the google search list have the same ROM download link.Its not only rootmygalaxy.net, but also sites like androiding.how and theandroidsoul.com which have the same link.There is no Marshmallow available for OPO right now.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why even bother looking anywhere except XDA? Those sites are all useless, they post this bs purely to get traffic. Plus, XDA will have 6.0 first anyway.
like this?
http://forum.xda-developers.com/one...nt/experimental-homemade-android-6-0-t3225725
projeto56 said:
So, what's up with this rom
http://rootmygalaxy.net/safely-update-oneplus-one-to-android-6-0-marshmallow/
I've installed it earlier, it looks like 6.0, but on device info it says 5.1.1. Anyone else have any experiences?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Now they have updated that page and now there is a latest buid of marshmallow and that is working.All othher websites also have updated that link.:good:
IamAlexD said:
Now they have updated that page and now there is a latest buid of marshmallow and that is working.All othher websites also have updated that link.:good:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The link for the download is just to one of the mirrors for the experimental build already on XDA. I really can't wait for MM to drop in some form for the OPO. Maybe XDA will be sorta back to normal again
Can anybody build the CopperheadOS for our Pixel? Maybe with a small Donation?
https://copperhead.co/android/docs/building
If it is not allowed to ask such things here, please send me a PM.
Greetings
what does this include? and your in the wrong thread
robotnikz said:
Can anybody build the CopperheadOS for our Pixel? Maybe with a small Donation?
https://copperhead.co/android/docs/building
If it is not allowed to ask such things here, please send me a PM.
Greetings
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But they have a download link for Pixel on their website: https://copperhead.co/android/downloads
Is it because they say: "available via purchase soon"?
uodii said:
But they have a download link for Pixel on their website:https://copperhead.co/android/downloads
Is it because they say: "available via purchase soon"?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You need a login to download it. I assume you only get a login after purchasing a license from them.
uodii said:
But they have a download link for Pixel on their website: https://copperhead.co/android/downloads
Is it because they say: "available via purchase soon"?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes you have to purchase it or build it yourself. But I am not able to build it myself
robotnikz said:
Yes you have to purchase it or build it yourself. But I am not able to build it myself
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If they are selling security and the OS I dou t that they allow anyone to build their software. If you can build from their sources I dou t it includes any of their additional software and is pro ably just bare android
devilsadidas said:
If they are selling security and the OS I dou t that they allow anyone to build their software. If you can build from their sources I dou t it includes any of their additional software and is pro ably just bare android
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No. It is allowed to build from their sources.
robotnikz said:
No. It is allowed to build from their sources.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I tried to build it two times. The first built with no errors but the files weren't in zip format and I couldn't figure how to flash them. My second failed because I still need to get by build environment set up again. I just re-installed Linux a few days. I just switched to Linux Mint permanently a few weeks ago from Windows so I've been dealing with the transition. I have the source downloaded so I'll be tinkering with that when I have time. Hopefully something good will happen in a few days on my end. Till then this thread needs to be moved to the Q&A section. I'm glad you threw the question out there and hopefully others will join the party.
Misterxtc said:
I tried to build it two times. The first built with no errors but the files weren't in zip format and I couldn't figure how to flash them. My second failed because I still need to get by build environment set up again. I just re-installed Linux a few days. I just switched to Linux Mint permanently a few weeks ago from Windows so I've been dealing with the transition. I have the source downloaded so I'll be tinkering with that when I have time. Hopefully something good will happen in a few days on my end. Till then this thread needs to be moved to the Q&A section. I'm glad you threw the question out there and hopefully others will join the party.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you very much for your effort. I am also on Mint but I am not familiar with building ROMs. Maybe I'll have a look at it someday
robotnikz said:
Thank you very much for your effort. I am also on Mint but I am not familiar with building ROMs. Maybe I'll have a look at it someday
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My guess is that they don't mind private builds. However, I would doubt they would be okay with a build being posted in a forum like this. Also, from reading their website it appears when you pay, you're getting the support of the devs directly as well as their updates pushed directly to your phone without having to do new builds like you will without a license. I could be slightly off but I think that was the gist of it.
robotnikz said:
Thank you very much for your effort. I am also on Mint but I am not familiar with building ROMs. Maybe I'll have a look at it someday
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Same here. I used to build ROMs for Samsung and AOSP is pretty foreign to me but I am learning. It's quite a bit for me between real life, a new OS and AOSP. It's cool though, my 40+ year old brain was getting a bit stale.... Anyway I tried again today for a few hours and made some progress. I successfully compiled a generic build but when I try sailfish I get a user error and it tells me to change user. Seeing that the official build isn't available for purchase I think they blocked the build process some way. I can compile Pure Nexus no problem so it's not my set up, probably their directions. But on the other hand it could be on my end. Either way I'll still be looking into it.
Is there a way to compile this os with gapps already built in for personal use. After building and flashing it on my phone I found the lack of certain Google services very annoying. Flashing gapps after installing the os didn't work. Also if you're on T-Mobile no data connection unless you change settings in apn, I wonder if flashing stock vendor img would help with that.
robotnikz said:
Can anybody build the CopperheadOS for our Pixel? Maybe with a small Donation?
https://copperhead.co/android/docs/building
If it is not allowed to ask such things here, please send me a PM.
Greetings
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
did you did it, can you instruct this ?
robotnikz said:
Can anybody build the CopperheadOS for our Pixel? Maybe with a small Donation?
https://copperhead.co/android/docs/building
If it is not allowed to ask such things here, please send me a PM.
Greetings
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hello,
I have successfully found a way to build sailfish cos , if you are interested .
ksuhiyp said:
Hello,
I have successfully found a way to build sailfish cos , if you are interested .
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Would be great. I'm very interested.
ksuhiyp said:
Hello,
I have successfully found a way to build sailfish cos , if you are interested .
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm also very interested! Tell how you did it
Pixel 2 CopperheadOS
Anyone have tryied to compile from source copperhead for Pixel2 phone?
I am also very interested! Could you please share? May be for a donation....
ksuhiyp said:
Hello,
I have successfully found a way to build sailfish cos , if you are interested .
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is on a Project Fi/Android One Moto X4.
Before I take the update, is there anything anyone wants me to capture? (I'm not rooted, so bear that in mind when making requests)
enriquejones666 said:
This is on a Project Fi/Android One Moto X4.
Before I take the update, is there anything anyone wants me to capture? (I'm not rooted, so bear that in mind when making requests)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can you logcat to get the link to direct download the update?
Here's a tutorial on how to do so
Yes pls capture
even z2 force is receiving update
are you opted in for MFN..?
Hot ****.
Jithin91 said:
are you opted in for MFN..?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Actually, yes. I completely forgot that I did that when I first got the phone. Does that mean this is the Oreo Beta?
Twski said:
Can you logcat to get the link to direct download the update?
Here's a tutorial on how to do so
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Weird - I got the logcat, but I don't see anything that could be an URL for the update around the time I checked for the update (I have my phone set to Not check for updates, and I manually run the "Check for Update", so I know exactly when the update check occurred.)
I've attached the portion of my logcat around the time of the update check (12-22-17 06:05am), if you'd like to review it.
OK, I found some entries in the LogCat (see attached) which clearly are for the update, but still no update URL. Sorry.
enriquejones666 said:
This is on a Project Fi/Android One Moto X4.
Before I take the update, is there anything anyone wants me to capture? (I'm not rooted, so bear that in mind when making requests)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Please check whether project treble is enabled?
I know it's too early but how's the battery life compared to nougat?!
Screenshots
Also Include screenshots.. Thanks in Advance!!
enriquejones666 said:
Actually, yes. I completely forgot that I did that when I first got the phone. Does that mean this is the Oreo Beta?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
maybe or may not be..
but almost all users with Android One are saying that they are getting the update..
So chances are there for a wide roll-out
UPDATE:
Found this on twitter..
https://twitter.com/projectfi/status/943900051541233665
So its not a soak test.. Its official release..
But how can a company release a build without beta testing
Please share your review and also the screen shot
enriquejones666 said:
This is on a Project Fi/Android One Moto X4.
Before I take the update, is there anything anyone wants me to capture? (I'm not rooted, so bear that in mind when making requests)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
https://www.xda-developers.com/project-treble-android-oreo/
Anyone wanna check if this update is treble enabled?
Howto can be found in the link above.
Treble support
Can someone check project treble is there?
Download termux app from play store and enter this command
getprop ro.treble.enabled
See the result is true or false
any updates regardes treble?
Abhi142 said:
Can someone check project treble is there?
Download termux app from play store and enter this command
getprop ro.treble.enabled
See the result is true or false
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I got the Oreo update on my project fi android one Moto x4 yesterday. Doesn't look like treble is enabled
dan.goga said:
I got the Oreo update on my project fi android one Moto x4 yesterday. Doesn't look like treble is enabled
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
does your phone have vendor partition?
thats disappoint i thought motorloa android one mobile would support treble project
Xioami Mi A1 dont support it too only htc u11 life
this is bad i think, because phones with treble will get better third party support, once moto drops official support in 2019.
I have not seen this update yet. I am sure it will come soon. I am surprised there is not any more information on this here on the interweb.
With HD10 (2017) unlock/TWRP available - link (thanks to @k4y0z!!!), the next natural question is a custom ROM. The subject may turn out to be slightly trickier than what appears at first sight.
Let's have a discussion thread to brainstorm on this and not wonder off-topic in other places.
I had seen @DragonFire1024 & @Rortiz2 tried to work on that, so feel free to chime in as necessary.
What we have:
HD10 (2017) chipset - MT8173 (2+2 cores), there is an beefier brother to it, MT8176 (2+4 cores). For most practical purposes both chipsets seem almost identical software-wise.
MT8173 was introduced in March 2015 (time of Lollipop domination - Android 5). MT8176 was introduced in October 2016 (getting toward Nougat - Android 7).
The efforts up to date on a custom ROM for this chipset appear to be by @Goayandi, who is still active on XDA, so his work could be used a starting point. I believe @Goayandi was working on Android 7 (Nougat). Here are some of the original links:
XDA : Mediatek MT8173 & MT8176 development
Reddit: Mediatek MT8173 & MT8176 development
Stuff from Amazon for MT8173 (both HD10 2017 and FireTV2) is Lollipop-vintage (Android 5), other devices with these chipsets seem to have reached Nougat (Android 7). It does not appear that there is any known MT8173/MT8176 device with Android 8, or 9 (or is there?). It seems that @diplomatic has an Asus like this with Nougat.
At the moment, it feels a a Nougat custom ROM might be the ceiling for the device, given the difficulties of finding proprietary pieces for MTK chipsets to get Android 8 or 9 going. Now, even Android 7 is still a bit of a challenge, given limited prior success.
More thoughts/ideas? Feel free to fill this thread with random thoughts as much as you want - that's what it's for!!!
I'm really looking forward to an AOSP experience on this tablet, to be honest. Can't wait to see what they come up with!
GuyInDogSuit said:
I'm really looking forward to an AOSP experience on this tablet, to be honest. Can't wait to see what they come up with!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As long as I can set up everything properly I'm ready to go. I've managed to get past script issues I think. I can get it to flash and it boots to the orange fire logo and sits for eternity. This was the same result pre and post TWRP. So at this point it's probably the installation and improper setup of the tree and files. If someone can point me to a guide or give me instructions on how to add support to my AOSP working directory, that would be great. This bit of the leg work is hard as there really aren't any guides that are detailed enough or that work anymore.
Secondly, I think if we are going to use a kernel, we either use the 7.0 source, or just use the kit I have to build our own. Amazon cherry picked the crap out of the kernel practically to the bare bones, so I think expanding from it is just a waste of time, especially since we have the kit that does a lot of the work for us, including providing signatures and the tools to sign etc.
Sent from my Galaxy Tab3 Lite 7.0 using XDA Labs
I wouldn't mind even if the best ROM available is a 6.0 Marshmallow one. Anything that gives AOSP on a stable base for the Fire HD10 is going to be awesome.
DragonFire1024 said:
As long as I can set up everything properly I'm ready to go. I've managed to get past script issues I think. I can get it to flash and it boots to the orange fire logo and sits for eternity. This was the same result pre and post TWRP. So at this point it's probably the installation and improper setup of the tree and files. If someone can point me to a guide or give me instructions on how to add support to my AOSP working directory, that would be great. This bit of the leg work is hard as there really aren't any guides that are detailed enough or that work anymore.
Secondly, I think if we are going to use a kernel, we either use the 7.0 source, or just use the kit I have to build our own. Amazon cherry picked the crap out of the kernel practically to the bare bones, so I think expanding from it is just a waste of time, especially since we have the kit that does a lot of the work for us, including providing signatures and the tools to sign etc.
Sent from my Galaxy Tab3 Lite 7.0 using XDA Labs
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So did you end up successfully unbricking your device?
I did share working amazon kernel sources in the HD-10 Unlock thread.
They worked well in my tree to compile TWRP.
k4y0z said:
So did you end up successfully unbricking your device?
I did share working amazon kernel sources in the HD-10 Unlock thread.
They worked well in my tree to compile TWRP.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry for being out of the loop - were those kernel sources for Lollipop? Or does it even matter at all - meaning they would be good to go with newer Android versions as well.
Could you link to those posts in here?
bibikalka said:
Sorry for being out of the loop - were those kernel sources for Lollipop? Or does it even matter at all - meaning they would be good to go with newer Android versions as well.
Could you link to those posts in here?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
They will likely need some patches to work with newer versions, but it's a good start I'd say.
It's the most recent version amazon has published.
k4y0z said:
So did you end up successfully unbricking your device?
I did share working amazon kernel sources in the HD-10 Unlock thread.
They worked well in my tree to compile TWRP.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am working on it as we speak. I downloaded the zip from the second post in this thread, 1.1. extracted and ran sudo ./bootrom-step.sh. said it can't find build/payload directory it doesn't exist. So I assume I use that folder from the other unbricking thread copy it to yours? Assuming its a yes to that question, I keep getting the serial port errors. I also had to delete a setting in udev (this was my own addition to it) and rebooted PC. Now I am having a cigarette. When I do it again, if I still get serial port errors, time to try each of the 8 or 10 other ports on the PC.
Sent from my MotoG3 using XDA Labs
---------- Post added at 06:23 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:21 PM ----------
bibikalka said:
Sorry for being out of the loop - were those kernel sources for Lollipop? Or does it even matter at all - meaning they would be good to go with newer Android versions as well.
Could you link to those posts in here?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The one I have and provided is a source to 7.0. looks nicely stocked.
Sent from my MotoG3 using XDA Labs
bibikalka said:
With HD10 (2017) unlock/TWRP available - link (thanks to @k4y0z!!!), the next natural question is a custom ROM. The subject may turn out to be slightly trickier than what appears at first sight.
Let's have a discussion thread to brainstorm on this and not wonder off-topic in other places.
I had seen @DragonFire1024 & @Rortiz2 tried to work on that, so feel free to chime in as necessary.
What we have:
HD10 (2017) chipset - MT8173 (2+2 cores), there is an beefier brother to it, MT8176 (2+4 cores). For most practical purposes both chipsets seem almost identical software-wise.
MT8173 was introduced in March 2015 (time of Lollipop domination - Android 5). MT8176 was introduced in October 2016 (getting toward Nougat - Android 7).
The efforts up to date on a custom ROM for this chipset appear to be by @Goayandi, who is still active on XDA, so his work could be used a starting point. I believe @Goayandi was working on Android 7 (Nougat). Here are some of the original links:
XDA : Mediatek MT8173 & MT8176 development
Reddit: Mediatek MT8173 & MT8176 development
Stuff from Amazon for MT8173 (both HD10 2017 and FireTV2) is Lollipop-vintage (Android 5), other devices with these chipsets seem to have reached Nougat (Android 7). It does not appear that there is any known MT8173/MT8176 device with Android 8, or 9 (or is there?). It seems that @diplomatic has an Asus like this with Nougat.
At the moment, it feels a a Nougat custom ROM might be the ceiling for the device, given the difficulties of finding proprietary pieces for MTK chipsets to get Android 8 or 9 going. Now, even Android 7 is still a bit of a challenge, given limited prior success.
More thoughts/ideas? Feel free to fill this thread with random thoughts as much as you want - that's what it's for!!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi bibikalka,
Very good idea this thread.
What you can do, is to port a port a ROM of another MT8173 tablet to the FIRE HD10 2017.
This works and I have tested it on my BQ Aquaris M8 (MT8163) it has a similar MTK so I guess it will work. I have ported for example a ROM of an asus zenpad that uses MT8163 and at least the rom boots.
BTW: Oreo on MT8176: https://www.xda-developers.com/alldocube-x-10-5-inch-android-8-1-oreo/
DragonFire1024 said:
I am working on it as we speak. I downloaded the zip from the second post in this thread, 1.1. extracted and ran sudo ./bootrom-step.sh. said it can't find build/payload directory it doesn't exist. So I assume I use that folder from the other unbricking thread copy it to yours? Assuming its a yes to that question, I keep getting the serial port errors. I also had to delete a setting in udev (this was my own addition to it) and rebooted PC. Now I am having a cigarette. When I do it again, if I still get serial port errors, time to try each of the 8 or 10 other ports on the PC.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Apparently I forgot to add the right files.
give me a moment.
---------- Post added at 06:47 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:36 PM ----------
DragonFire1024 said:
I am working on it as we speak. I downloaded the zip from the second post in this thread, 1.1. extracted and ran sudo ./bootrom-step.sh. said it can't find build/payload directory it doesn't exist. So I assume I use that folder from the other unbricking thread copy it to yours? Assuming its a yes to that question, I keep getting the serial port errors. I also had to delete a setting in udev (this was my own addition to it) and rebooted PC. Now I am having a cigarette. When I do it again, if I still get serial port errors, time to try each of the 8 or 10 other ports on the PC.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have fixed the upload, please use amonet-suez-v1.1.1.zip
DragonFire1024 said:
The one I have and provided is a source to 7.0. looks nicely stocked.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But these aren't amazon sources are they?
They probably are missing some drivers then.
But if they are for mt8173 they could be used as a source to patch the amazon-sources.
k4y0z said:
Apparently I forgot to add the right files.
give me a moment.
---------- Post added at 06:47 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:36 PM ----------
I have fixed the upload, please use amonet-suez-v1.1.1.zip
But these aren't amazon sources are they?
They probably are missing some drivers then.
But if they are for mt8173 they could be used as a source to patch the amazon-sources.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'll provide a link in a few. Trying your fix now.
Sent from my Galaxy Tab3 Lite 7.0 using XDA Labs
Rortiz2 said:
Hi bibikalka,
Very good idea this thread.
What you can do, is to port a port a ROM of another MT8173 tablet to the FIRE HD10 2017.
This works and I have tested it on my BQ Aquaris M8 (MT8163) it has a similar MTK so I guess it will work. I have ported for example a ROM of an asus zenpad that uses MT8163 and at least the rom boots.
BTW: Oreo on MT8176: https://www.xda-developers.com/alldocube-x-10-5-inch-android-8-1-oreo/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Excellent find! Here is a review link:
https://forum.xda-developers.com/ge...ldocube-x-review-media-playback-king-t3902539
Alldocube X kind of has 2x of everything compared to HD10 2017, but at 2x price I wonder how fast Oreo would be on HD10 and if 2Gb of RAM would cut it. But this is definitely the device to copy if one wants latest and greatest!
And here is a thread with misc download links for ROMs:
https://forum.xda-developers.com/ge...n/10-5-inch-super-amoled-2560-x-1600-t3821327
bibikalka said:
Excellent find! Here is a review link:
https://forum.xda-developers.com/ge...ldocube-x-review-media-playback-king-t3902539
Alldocube X kind of has 2x of everything compared to HD10 2017, but at 2x price I wonder how fast Oreo would be on HD10 and if 2Gb of RAM would cut it. But this is definitely the device to copy if one wants latest and greatest!
And here is a thread with misc download links for ROMs:
https://forum.xda-developers.com/ge...n/10-5-inch-super-amoled-2560-x-1600-t3821327
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I will try to port lineage 15.1 but the safest thing is that it will not work.
I have also ported an AOSP Rom for anyone who wants to try it. Tomorrow I will give more info.
Rortiz2 said:
I will try to port lineage 15.1 but the safest thing is that it will not work.
I have also ported an AOSP Rom for anyone who wants to try it. Tomorrow I will give more info.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is great news! I am eagerly awaiting more info about this AOSP ROM
Rortiz2 said:
I will try to port lineage 15.1 but the safest thing is that it will not work.
I have also ported an AOSP Rom for anyone who wants to try it. Tomorrow I will give more info.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ffstudios said:
This is great news! I am eagerly awaiting more info about this AOSP ROM
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Alright, we have both an eager developer, and a tester!!! Just remember, avoid bricking !
Very recently (March 2019) @wangyiling seems to have put together a LineageOS 15.1 ROM for MT8173/8176 - link, so hopefully we can re-purpose that for HD10. It's great to have an active developer elsewhere looking at the same thing!
It feels that if there is at least something that boots the kernel, it'd be a huge step forward.
bibikalka said:
Alright, we have both an eager developer, and a tester!!! Just remember, avoid bricking !
Very recently (March 2019) @wangyiling seems to have put together a LineageOS 15.1 ROM for MT8173/8176 - link, so hopefully we can re-purpose that for HD10. It's great to have an active developer elsewhere looking at the same thing!
It feels that if there is at least something that boots the kernel, it'd be a huge step forward.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If my testing on ROMs caused my brick, we have to be careful. I've been testing and flashing test ROMs for months now and never bricked like this. I think I may know what happened and if I'm right, I'm not sure what effect if any this will have on flashing a rom. According to the fstab.mt8173 file in the root directory, the partitions we flash for a rom, aren't part of the EMMC: data, system, cache are all ext4. All other partitions are however EMMC. So if I recall correctly, I did list the system as EMMC in the build script, but did intend to remove it. I made a last minute adjustment to the script and didn't change that part though.
https://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=78542898&postcount=618
Sent from my MotoG3 using XDA Labs
Rortiz2 said:
I will try to port lineage 15.1 but the safest thing is that it will not work.
I have also ported an AOSP Rom for anyone who wants to try it. Tomorrow I will give more info.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I too am willing to test. Just let me know and I'll be sure to wear my best testing pants. [emoji41]
Sent from my SM-G9650/DS running stang5litre Pie ROM
AOSP ROM TEST 1 (suez)
Ok guys so here's the first test for the AOSP ROM.
First of all, I am not responsible for bricked devices. It is you who decides to try the ROM without knowing if it will work because it is a TEST.
DOWNLOAD: Removed
INSTALL INSTRUCTIONS:
- Boot TWRP
- Make NANDROID BACKUP
- Make wipes
- Format data
- Install ROM
- Reboot
Please. If the installation fails, send the errors and if the ROM starts, comment on the bugs.
Regards!
Rortiz2 said:
Ok guys so here's the first test for the AOSP ROM.
First of all, I am not responsible for bricked devices. It is you who decides to try the ROM without knowing if it will work because it is a TEST.
DOWNLOAD: https://mega.nz/#!C5dEQIKR!14BcGTiaT-xsrPUc-AxmWrTLj92Y5A2VgeNX2VA1uUE
INSTALL INSTRUCTIONS:
- Boot TWRP
- Make NANDROID BACKUP
- Make wipes
- Format data
- Install ROM
- Reboot
Please. If the installation fails, send the errors and if the ROM starts, comment on the bugs.
Regards!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sounds good to me. Won't have a chance till later this afternoon/evening to give it a whirl, but when I do I'll definitely share my results and any information that may be useful. Thank you!
Sent from my SM-G9650/DS running stang5litre Pie ROM
Rortiz2 said:
Ok guys so here's the first test for the AOSP ROM.
First of all, I am not responsible for bricked devices. It is you who decides to try the ROM without knowing if it will work because it is a TEST.
DOWNLOAD: https://mega.nz/#!C5dEQIKR!14BcGTiaT-xsrPUc-AxmWrTLj92Y5A2VgeNX2VA1uUE
...
Please. If the installation fails, send the errors and if the ROM starts, comment on the bugs.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Which AOSP version is this? Could you try that Oreo Lineage stuff from @wangyiling at some point as well?
One of these days we'll have a ROM developer and a tester within the same person Too bad we've lost @DragonFire1024 since his tablet got bricked