Hello,
I'm just here because I'm very happy to announce that less than 2 hours ago, Samsung complied with a request that I made for the source codes of the Samsung Galaxy A20e (SM-A202F).
These sources can be found here.
I've also compiled two GitHub repositories with the kernel/platform sources, just in case anybody needs it:
Kernel sources
Platform
NOTE: The platform sources also include the vendor tree.
AlwaysLivid said:
Hello,
I'm just here because I'm very happy to announce that less than 2 hours ago, Samsung complied with a request that I made for the source codes of the Samsung Galaxy A20e (SM-A202F).
These sources can be found here.
I've also compiled two GitHub repositories with the kernel/platform sources, just in case anybody needs it:
Kernel sources
Platform
NOTE: The platform sources also include the vendor tree.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Pls Build a twrp or custom Recovery
Related
The Samsung i7500 (or Galaxy) is a Google Android-based phone.
I have heard that this is mainly a HTC forum, but I am happy to inform you that the Samsung i7500/Galaxy kernel source code has been released:
http://img.kr.samsungmobile.com/images/opensource/download/OpenSource/GT-I7500_OpenSource.zip
can not get in....
GitHub - drakaz/gaosp_kernel
Contribute to drakaz/gaosp_kernel development by creating an account on GitHub.
github.com
Hi guys and girls, my problem is: i'm making a ROM but i can't found the sources like kernel,proprietary vendor files and device configuration source
of KitKat in git format, the github of razrqcom-dev-team only have source of CyanogenMod 11, the sources of cm 11 doesn't work with the ROM i'm doing. Please Help
Itachitops said:
Hi guys and girls, my problem is: i'm making a ROM but i can't found the sources like kernel,proprietary vendor files and device configuration source
of KitKat in git format, the github of razrqcom-dev-team only have source of CyanogenMod 11, the sources of cm 11 doesn't work with the ROM i'm doing. Please Help
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
not released yet afaik
Sent from my phone
Hey everyone, i was just building for experimental purposes (Galaxy note 3 exynos), and I'm a noob, i have synched the lineage sources(in line folder), device tree, kernel sources, vendor_ha3g, vendor_samsung so please can you tell me in which folder do i have to place all these like device tree, kernel sources etc and when building what is the name of the device which is to be written in the command (brunch ???) Or (breakfast ????) Please help me out.
Thanks in advance
As title is saying, nothing less, not much more.
Samsungs official source can be optained on github
https://github.com/ASKSAP/android_platform_samsung_a32x.git
https://github.com/ASKSAP/android_kernel_samsung_a32x.git
I've created partially working dev tree using https://github.com/SebaUbuntu/TWRP-device-tree-generator
Available at
https://github.com/netbospl/android_device_samsung_a32x.git
Lookng forward to read what You think about this.
Unpackbootimg that I've used and is/was working was compiled from
https://github.com/osm0sis/mkbootimg
Source was release for A326U variant by Samsung, so I've uploaded it to github.
A326USQU1AUCF/A326USQU1AUD4 - SM-A326U_NA_RR_Opensource
GitHub - netbospl/android_kernel_samsung_a32xu: A326USQU1AUCF/A326USQU1AUD4 Samsung provided kernel Source SM-A326U_NA_RR_Opensource.zip
A326USQU1AUCF/A326USQU1AUD4 Samsung provided kernel Source SM-A326U_NA_RR_Opensource.zip - GitHub - netbospl/android_kernel_samsung_a32xu: A326USQU1AUCF/A326USQU1AUD4 Samsung provided kernel Source...
github.com
GitHub - netbospl/android_platform_samsung_a32xu: A326USQU1AUCF/A326USQU1AUD4 Samsung provided platform source SM-A326U_NA_RR_Opensource.zip
A326USQU1AUCF/A326USQU1AUD4 Samsung provided platform source SM-A326U_NA_RR_Opensource.zip - GitHub - netbospl/android_platform_samsung_a32xu: A326USQU1AUCF/A326USQU1AUD4 Samsung provided platform ...
github.com
Is anyone here knowlage-able in Andorid building process that's willing to walk through my out images for PitchBlack Recovery and AOSP R/11 images??
If there is no red flags, I should be able to do same for A32XU/A32XU1
Edit: also please note that device tree on my repo is not up to date/that I've used to successfully build AOSP, master should be fine for PitchBlack CWM A326B, and that's where I'll intentionally leave it for now
You got that AOSP ROM ready yet?
Good
I'm new to the android build system but have been running stripped kernels for years. I'm working on a custom rom for a TCL A30 (MT6762/MT6765).
I've looked at the AOSP code base and TCL source, for a similar device, and it looks like the TCL source generates the needed kernel .config file with scripts. There are multiple scripts for different archs and cellphone carriers. My TCL A30 has a Bangkok_CC (ConsumerCellular) tag and I found arch/arm64/configs/bangkok_TF_defconfig (TracFone). There do not appear to be any patches in the TCL source. The source I found:
TCL-Mobile on sourceforge
Has the Tracfone TCL A3:
Tracfone TCL A3x product link
That source contains Bangkok_TF_defconfig.
I was able to adb pull /proc/config.gz directly from the device and it's running 4.19.126+ released last month.
First question: Can I generate a bangkok_CC_defconfig from /proc/config.gz in the AOSP code base? It is mosttly monolithic
Code:
cat .config | grep =m > kernel_modules.txt
CONFIG_IKHEADERS=m
CONFIG_TCP_CONG_WESTWOOD=m
CONFIG_TCP_CONG_HTCP=m
CONFIG_SERIAL_OF_PLATFORM=m
CONFIG_BATTERY_MT6359=m
CONFIG_SND_SOC_MT6359_ACCDET=m
CONFIG_USB_DUMMY_HCD=m
CONFIG_MMC_SDHCI=m
CONFIG_MMC_SDHCI_PLTFM=m
CONFIG_MMSTAT_TRACER=m
At the time of this post the latest upstream is 4.19.244
Second question: Are most Android projects like Debian/RHEL where they back patch kernel vulnerabilites? Would the most up-to-date kernel result from the latest AOSP source and would building it just be a matter of dropping in my /proc/config.gz and setting the build environment that I found in the TCL source?
I suspect that AOSP is contributing back to kernel.org. Third question: AOSP vs Kernel.org source? Does Google backport like RHEL/Debian? Or would I get a more recent,, secure kernel using upstream kernel.org source?.
Last question Clang vs GCC. I've just setup my Arch Linux build box w/ arm64_gcc. Speed is less important to me than stable builds. What are the arguments for one compiler over another?