Database Info

Mobile Apps vs. Mobile Websites: Which is Becoming King In The War?

Mobile Apps vs. Mobile Websites – it’s still a hot debate. If you are opting for mobile sites for your company, you are not doing it wrong, but to be profited more, mobile apps are mostly recommended.
Now a day business persons are whispering and do gossips about mobile advertising and marketing all the time. The queries that perhaps cracked into the heads of many are how to start? Should I make moves to do something for mobile in the first place? Do I need a Mobile App or Mobile Site? And yes the main thing; what’s the difference between both of these and how they would be favourable?
As per all Mobile Application Development Companies, Mobile websites and applications can appear very similar at first look, and figuring out which is mostly suited to your prerequisites will rely on a number of factors comprising available budget, targeted audiences and intended purposes. Both mobile sites and mobile applications let the users find and access your business from the devices they utilize the most, but a mobile site and mobile application is not the equal thing. Let’s take a look what is the difference between the two and how they can be valuable to you as per your expectations.
It’s All About Mobile Site & Mobile Application
Before you can assess the profits of a Mobile site vs. Mobile Application, it’s significant to understand the main variances between the two. Both, applications and mobile sites are accessed on a handheld device such as gadget and tablets.
Mobile Application Development comprise smartphone or Tablet Application. These Apps are the real Applications which are installed in the mobile devices commonly from an app marketplace; for example, Apple’s App store or Android’s Google Play Store, instead of being rendered inside a browser.
Similar to some other site, a mobile web development site comprises of browser based pages of HTML that are connected together and opened over the internet. Mobile friendly websites can present text content, images, data and video. They can also access mobile specific features; for example, click-to-call or area based mapping. The observable and recognizable characteristic that differentiates a mobile site from an ordinary site is the fact that it is planned and designed for the touch screen interface and smaller handheld display.
Mobile Apps vs. Mobile Sites- Which One Is The Finest To Pick?
When it comes to take a decision that what to pick between both of these, the most fitting decision truly relies on your key objectives. If your objective is to offer mobile friendly content to the broadest possible audience then a mobile site is likely the best approach to go but if you need to build up a game than mobile application development is best option for you to choose. In some circumstances, you may need both, but it doesn’t make any sense if you build an app without having a website that does not exist in the market.
Mobile Website should be viewed as your first step to create mobile web presence where as an application is helpful for building up an application for a certain reason that can't be adequately fulfilled through a web browser.
What Makes Mobile Websites Advantageous?
Mobile website bodes well for you if your objectives are primarily centred on marketing or public conversation for your business. Mobile site has number of observable benefits over applications including more extensive accessibility, compatibility and expense adequacy.
A single mobile site can achieve clients over a wide range of mobile devices, while local applications require a different form to be produced for each type of gadgets.
Mobile websites are constantly accessible for users to come back to and can likewise be bookmarked whereas applications’ life is very short unless your app is something genuinely remarkable. So there is always one question that to what extent an app will keep going on a client's gadget.
URLs of Mobile Websites are simply integrated inside other mobile technologies such as SMS, QR codes etc.
Mobile website has superior reach ability than any native application as it is available across platforms and also simply shared amongst customers as well as on search engines.
A mobile site is available directly to clients through a browser over an extensive variety of devices, whereas app needs to be downloaded first from the app marketplace and then require installation.
A mobile website is more superior to an app In the matter of flexibility to update any kind of content.
It is very easy for clients to find any mobile websites as their pages can be shown in search results and also listed in industry specific directories.
If you build up a mobile site than it will be more time and cost effective than the development of any native app.
Visitors to your regular site can be redirected to your mobile website when they are using smart devices whereas apps are restricted to app store.
When Does An App Is Best Suit Your Needs?
Applications are still exceptionally famous, in spite of the numerous characteristic advantages of the mobile website. Here are number of particular utilization situations where an application will be your best decision.
If your focused clients are going to utilize your application in a personalized fashion all the time, then an application gives an incredible approach to do that.
An app is always going to be your finest choice if you want to craft stunning interactive games.
If you want to utilize a user’s camera or processing power, an application will do it very excellently on the go.
If you need to perform any kind of complex calculations, reports or charts on the data you have, an app is best suited for you to do this.
After downloading and installing app once, there is no need of internet connection.
Mobile apps and mobile sites have their similarities and differences. Organizations looking to take advantages of the mobile websites when their objectives are marketing driven and want to share information amongst clients and in web index. On the other hand, when the objective is to deliver an application that needs to work more like a PC program than a site, than an app is likely going to be needed.

Mobile apps are more expensive, however using mobile apps users perform target actions much more often then using sites. So I think it is better to develop app if you have money.
But if you can also adopt your site to mobile it will help to promote both you app and your site.

Frameworks like Twitter Bootstrap makes it pretty easy to build mobile websites these days. You can be available anywhere ( PC / Mobile ) with a responsive website. Google also provides responsive ad modules to monetize while on a mobile device.
An app on the other hand adds
1. Reputation
2. Presence on user's device
more than anything else.

Mobile Apps over-responsive eCommerce websites
9 Benefits of Mobile Apps over-responsive eCommerce websites
1. Mobile Apps are quicker. At the end of the day What users think and like is what makes business and profits.
2. Personalized content.
3. Instant Online and Offline access.
4. Applying device features.
5. Push Notifications and instant updates.
6. Branding and Design.
7. Productivity Growth and Cost minimization.
8. Interactive Engagement.

Mobile application development platform: how to choose best one?

There are many Mobile application development platforms available in the market; but which one you should choose and to which platform you would give priority?
Are you seeking for the right Mobile Application Development Platform for your job? Has your organization recognized mobile applications as a key part of your approach? Smartphone app development is blasting each single day and leaving developers challenged with a plenty of varieties for app development platforms. Since app development can be a money-spinning business, new app developers wanting to build up the next big thing. Mobile platforms have sprung up throughout the years to provide to the expanding demand, however how would you pick which platform is best for your application?
If we discuss about today’s desktop application developers, they basically have three platforms to look over: Windows, MAC and Linux. What's more, that being said, there are often approaches to make software composed for one platform which keep running on the others. Similar to this mobile app developers also have choices to select the platform as per their prerequisite from iOS, Android, Windows and Blackberry. They can also utilize cross platform tools to build up applications.
Mobile apps are similar to any other product; if you need individuals to utilize it, it should be great. Excessive applications are always attractive, intended for performance and modified to convey the usefulness your client wants, on the go and in a freely-flowing manner. When choosing a Mobile Application Development Platform, be assured it can facilitate the app development that will address the exceptional needs of your association and your current as well as future clients.
Other element to focus in terms of picking a Mobile Application Development Platform is your focused audience. If your application focuses the Hugh ratio of business, you need to verify the most widespread platforms for example; iOS and Android are your needs. If the community of businesses is your essential target, commercial platforms like BlackBerry make a worthy selection. Either way, it’s very important to preserve your focused audience in mind when choosing your mobile platform.
Whether creating mobile apps is your desire or an interest, you will require income to endure your business. Consider the expenses and benefit before you get on the app development drive. When you choose a mobile technology, guarantee it delivers a powerful safety and verification structure. Such features comprise safe and protected client/server communication, on-device encryption, offline validation, access controller and other appliance that will complement your current structure as well as direct your brand away from humiliation and legitimate activities.
Most customers need to convey native apps, on both iOS and Android. By focusing on both the platforms you will be, apparently, success the entire Smartphone market. Thus, assuming budget is not a restricting component, it bodes well to handle iOS and Android together. If the application is a prototype app we would like to suggest Android platform to begin with, because there is no approval process with the Android App Store; this is absolutely a major advantage to Android if you are in a competition of market.
The mobile backdrop is a long way from standardizing. With the continuous fracture of gadgets and no strong leader in the business sector, organizations must keep on providing their applications to a range of OSes. Yet, to do as such, be mindful that the mobile structure which is at the center of your methodology must be upheld by a merchant who can rapidly help new surroundings as they achieve the business and enable you to spread out your abilities to come across the requirements of clients and staffs while changing your business for mobile achievement.
Before picking a Mobile Application Development Platform, get your work done. Think twice what decisions you have made. Look at how strong is the platform’s development surroundings? What number of handsets is accessible and what elements do they offer? Also check out Cloud adaptability, analytics and communication services, native, web or Hybrid, developer tools and resources Etc.

Cross-Platform vs Native

Hey,
I'm a developer and I want to start with app development. No games, just productivity stuff. Without experience, I would tend to native apps, because you can use all api's, designs etc. I think cross platform frameworks is just a hype like java for web. HTML and CSS are the best choice for web and nobody is talking about java in web-dev. Now, I have a feeling that you're trying to use this technology in Apps because html5 and css3 a fancy. But this is just my opinion and maybe I'm wrong. As I mentioned, I do not have any experience in app-dev. Therefore, I want to ask you, because you have the experience.
Are cross platform frameworks a great choice to develop apps for iOS, Android and Windows 10 (Mobile)? Is it really time saving and do I have the same or similar possibilities? Or is it better to maintain three different platforms? Maybe the time effort isn't so much higher. I don't know. How high is it? Should I start with a cross platform framework and switch later to native apps, or is it better to start with native apps?
I hope you can share your experience with me. It is also great if you link something that reflects your opinion.
Thanks
neon

"nobody is talking about java in web-dev"
Not true Many pages and server side app are created in java. JEE, JSF etc. Problem is hosting for page. Hosting for PHP is cheaper and more popular. That is why PHP is more popular than Java in web-dev.
Anyway, in mobile platform, in my opion, better way is native apps. Cross platform frameworks are great, but only for some of the types application. Most applications can be made faster and look prettier if they are native. Many things is hard when you use crossplatform, and sometimes development takes longer. Much depends on type of application and requirements. Of course it's only my opinion. Many people think differently.

It depends. First of all it is important to know which API or librarys you want to use. If you have some intensive tasks or calculations you should go with native apps because they are often much faster then hybrid-apps written in JavaScript. If you don't have much intensive tasks and you have a completely new idea and want to make money with it you shoud go with hybrid-apps because it is a huge plus to have an App for Android AND iOS.

Thanks for you responses.
@Asmok78
You are right. PHP is more popular because it is cheaper.
Asmok78 wrote that most applications can be made faster and it depends an the application. spcialx wrote something equal. So, as an example, all my ideas are based on a client server architecture where users can sync there local data with a server to work collaborativ. As an example it could be an app for all three platform (iOS, Android and Windows 10(Mobile)). A user can manage a tasklist and share tasks with other users, or you have a project and one user can assign tasks to other users.
I guess it will be faster to get a first working app with a crossplatform framework. But I also guess, that in the long run it will be better to dev native apps. So why not start directly with native apps?

ne0n said:
[...]
I guess it will be faster to get a first working app with a crossplatform framework. But I also guess, that in the long run it will be better to dev native apps. So why not start directly with native apps?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Your assumption is completely right.
I'm working on a hybrid app right now. While it can be tempting, as soon as you get out of common features and patterns you can run into all sorts of problems and I found some quite hard to debug and solve. In the end I've busted all my deadlines. Performance are just OK for most uses, but still not comparable to native. All in all it depends on what you are trying to do, cross-platform apps might be ok for some use cases, but native apps are well worth the extra effort.

I think you should go native for apps. But not for games.
Sent from Tapatalk. Try LucidPod - lightweight podcast player.

Android NDK is there for performance reasons. If you plan to create something serious, then dedicated development cycles for each platform may be the obvious choice.

with web app, you can create app with nice and easy ui, can communicate with system api via plugin but sometime you need custom there control, and you need experience with native app , if it basic, you can do with only web app.
hybrid app is slower than native, only for small app.

Asmok78 said:
"nobody is talking about java in web-dev"
Not true Many pages and server side app are created in java. JEE, JSF etc. Problem is hosting for page. Hosting for PHP is cheaper and more popular. That is why PHP is more popular than Java in web-dev.
Anyway, in mobile platform, in my opion, better way is native apps. Cross platform frameworks are great, but only for some of the types application. Most applications can be made faster and look prettier if they are native. Many things is hard when you use crossplatform, and sometimes development takes longer. Much depends on type of application and requirements. Of course it's only my opinion. Many people think differently.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yep, I'm a java web guy. Tomcat, Struts 2 and JSP for me (though I'm slowly switching to Spring instead of Struts). The sheer power of Java, the stuff you can do, vs PHP (disclaimer: I coded PHP for 10 years professionally and now hate it, especially with the advent of Wordpress and Drupal) is absolutely staggering. Add to that a tonne of amazing libraries one can just plug straight in and you get a really useful bit of kit. Sorry, off-topic.
So yeah native is best. I work on a timesheeting/expenses solution for big mobile telcos in the UK and we looked at some cross-platform solutions at first, with Xamarin getting a decent run out but in the end we concluded it just wouldn't do the job, and went native. The issue really was that you'd end up with an app that wasn't quite right on either platform, and had to really write some nasty hacky stuff to make anything that took advantage of the advantages or preferred style of a particular platform. It just wasn't worth the effort in the end.

With Unity3d you can build for like 20 platforms.

Cross-Platform vs Native | Development Tools
1. Native apps are usually developed to work on a single mobile platform by using the native programming language mainly used for user interactions.
2. Cross platform requires different platforms for development are used for PhoneGap, Titanium, and Xamarin by using HTML and JavaScript mainly used for iOS, windows, and Android.

"no one is discussing java in web-dev"
Not genuine Many pages and server side application are made in java. JEE, JSF and so on. Issue is facilitating for page. Facilitating for PHP is less expensive and more mainstream. That is the reason PHP is more well known than Java in web-dev.
Anyway, in portable stage, in my opion, better way is local applications. Cross stage systems are incredible, yet just for a portion of the sorts application. Most applications can be made quicker and look prettier on the off chance that they are local. Numerous things is hard when you utilize crossplatform, and infrequently improvement takes longer. Much relies on upon kind of utilization and necessities. Obviously it's lone my sentiment. Numerous individuals think in an unexpected way.

whats the end goal/how big is your buget?
for example: business apps, they're not that heavy on interactions/animations - you may be better off with cross platform as it will generally cost less to create it that way
if heavy on interactions/animations: native would be a better choice and may cost more because it may be developed for multiple platforms, which in turn would make it more expensive.

Hi,
If you ask me I will go with the cross platform if I'm building the app from scratch as it's easier to make any changes and most importantly saves a lot of time.

Native vs Cross Platform

Hi everyone. I know that it's not a new subject, but I think it's a good subject to discuss about. It's the first question for any developer who wants to start a new project as everyday we can see new frameworks and languages comming up for development. After years of development now when I want to start a new project think about it again. It will be great if any one who has any experience can share it here. Because it's the experiences and times that show us if a decision was a good one or not. We can write about different parameters we considered to start a project, challenges and the results. Please feel free to add any other item you think is important to consider.
I start by myself:
Subject: A Network Communication App
Long/Short term consideration: Long term
Target platforms considered at start: android, windows
Target platforms implemented: after 2 years, android, windows, linux, (ios just newly started)
Framework: Qt5 (a cross platform framework)
Challenges: We used a crossplatform framework but as you know any OS has it's considerations and styles for development. Also different frameworks have different capacities for handling these features. In this project one of the challenges we had was the way android handles services and activities. We had to separate our UI from the logic controllers completely and implement a way to communicate between these separated processes. Also we had to implement the OS based features separately for each OS like notifications and alarms. Fortunately Qt let you use native codes for these specific features. For example you can use native java codes for showing a notification or playing system native sounds and alarms.
Pros: We implemented our UI just once and used it for all platforms. Also we implemented network and controller threads once and used them for all platforms. In this way if we need any change in our protocols or UI, we just develop them once. So we have one development team for all of them.
Result: Cross Platform with Qt was a good decision at that time for that project. Specially for a small team like what we had, because after you implement the base of a project like this you have to support it for a long time and add features to it. If we were using native codes, now we had to have separated teams for developing new features and supporting it.
It's great to read about other people stories. So Please let us know about them.
Thanks

Native vs. Cross-Platform
Native apps are developed only for a specific platform. These apps are formed in a language cooperative with the platform. Apple, for instance, prefers Objective C and Swift for iOS while Google supports Java for Android. Using these satisfactory languages, developers can create safer use of the inherent features of these platforms. A native app developed for Android will not function on iOS and vice versa.
Cross-platform apps are cooperative with various platforms. Due to the market share of Android and iOS, most cross-platform apps are confined to these two operating systems. These apps are produced in HTML and CSS since these official web technologies are platform-independent. Several cross-platform application development tools enable developers to create these apps with little trouble.

React Native Vs. Ionic – Disruptive Cross Platform App Development

Do you know that by 2020, there will be more than 6.1 billion mobile users?
Mobile app development is slowly becoming a mainstream digital solution and the number of apps on the app stores keeping on increasing rapidly. Today number of businesses are coming up with the need to get mobile apps to build. For them, it poses a critical solution that can be very helpful in expanding their business. Today different technologies and frameworks have come up to meet the ever-changing business needs. The popularity of cross-platform app development is increasing too. However, there is always a point of debate when it comes to choosing the right platform for app development.

React Native Vs. Ionic
React Native: React Native is an open-source mobile application framework designed by Facebook.
=> Advantages of React Native
1) Multiple platforms:
2) It is cheaper
3) Easy to find developers for your mobile app
4) Facebook supports it
5) Offers UI/UX focused development
6) Third-party plug-in support
Ionic: The framework concentrates on developing hybrid apps that perform the use of WebView, a specific HTML rendering engine to create your app runs on the device.
=> Advantages of Ionic
1) Easy to learn
2) Cross-platform app development
3) User Interface
4) Built on AngularJS
5) Performance
6) Cordova Plugins

React Native Vs. Ionic
Cross-platform mobile frameworks are meant to develop mobile applications for more than one platform. That is why they are the most selected frameworks. Most of the cross-platform app is compatible with both iOS and Android. We will learn about Xamarin, Ionic, Flutter, and React Native frameworks.
React Native
React native is created with JavaScript and ReactJS programming languages. It is designed by Facebook, whose primary purpose is to build mobile applications. React Native uses native components, and it does not depend on web views. React native uses iOS or Android components when creating a user interface.
Ionic
Another cross-platform framework is Ionic. The structure is built with Apache Cordova and Angular, and it gives the developers the chance to create more than one mobile platform. All applications built on the Ionic framework can run swiftly on Android and iOS devices.

Best Framework to use for cross platform development
Ionic & react-native both are a great choice for developing a cross-platform application.
If you are targeting ios and android development with advanced javascript then react native is a better fit but if you are more inclined towards the traditional web development to target mobile and web then you should go for ionic.
Ionic is basically more famous among enterprise and startups due its inclination towards web development technology where as react native has a history of native app development.

When it comes to disruptive cross-platform app development, React Native and Ionic are two of the most popular frameworks today. Both offer excellent performance and user experience but there are differences between them that make them better suited for different types of projects.
React Native is a mobile framework based on JavaScript that allows developers to create native mobile apps with near-native performance. It uses similar concepts as ReactJS, which simplifies the creation of complex user interfaces. Additionally, its modular architecture makes integrating third-party libraries easier than ever before.
On the other hand, Ionic is an HTML5 framework specifically built for hybrid app development. It works well with both Android and iOS platforms and lets users integrate Cordova plugins into their apps easily - giving them access to device features like camera or GPS capabilities in an efficient way. Though it’s code base is significantly larger than React Native’s, making maintenance more difficult in larger projects.
At the end of the day it really depends on your specific goals or needs when deciding which one to choose – if you need native platform capabilities go with Redux; if you prefer HTML5 structure then go with Ionic; or even consider leveraging both technologies together!
That's why we at Techmango suggest app development frameworks based on the goals alone.

Two well-liked cross-platform app development frameworks, React Native and Ionic, each have unique methodologies and application cases. Let's contrast React Native with Ionic in terms of their innovative potential for creating cross-platform apps.
Performance: Facebook created the React Native framework, which leverages native components to build a mobile app's user experience. This enables the programme to function natively on the device, resulting in exceptional performance and a fluid and responsive user interface. Ionic, in contrast, makes use of web standards like HTML, CSS, and JavaScript that are wrapped in a WebView, which can lead to somewhat worse performance than React Native.
Speed of Development: Ionic is renowned for having a short development cycle because it makes use of web technologies that are common among developers. This makes it a viable option for startups or small projects because it enables rapid prototyping and development. React Native also boasts quick development times since it features a hot-reloading feature that enables developers to observe changes in real time without having to completely recompile the app.
Native Access: Because React Native leverages native components, it offers better access to native device functions like the camera, GPS, and contacts. Because Ionic is built on web technologies, it could need extra plugins or unique native code to access specific device functionalities, which might increase the amount of time and work required for development.
React Native employs native components, so the UI/UX of the app can be more similar to that of a native app, giving consumers a seamless experience. Ionic, on the other hand, offers a consistent UI/UX across many platforms despite using web technologies, which may produce a somewhat different appearance and feel compared to native apps.
Community and Ecosystem: With detailed documentation, a huge number of libraries, and active community support, React Native has a larger community and ecosystem. Facebook has also given it considerable support, ensuring ongoing updates and enhancements. Ionic offers a respectable environment and community as well, though perhaps not as much as React Native.
In conclusion, both React Native and Ionic are effective frameworks for creating cross-platform apps, but they take different methods and make various compromises. Although React Native has a potentially steeper learning curve, it offers superior performance, native access, and a broader ecosystem. Ionic, on the other hand, is an excellent option for rapid prototyping or smaller projects because it provides quick development speed, a well-known web-based approach, and respectable performance. React Native vs. Ionic selection is based on project needs, team skill level, desired performance, and user experience.