We know how much you like to stream, ahem, "videos", and so cellular data is mega-important. Rate this thread to express how you think the Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note 8's LTE performs. A higher rating indicates that it's fantastic: throughput is excellent and signal strength is top-notch.
Then, drop a comment if you have anything to add.
You Know this is a Sprint forum!?
Sent from my SM-N950U using XDA-Developers Legacy app
XDA_RealLifeReview said:
We know how much you like to stream, ahem, "videos", and so cellular data is mega-important. Rate this thread to express how you think the Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note 8's LTE performs. A higher rating indicates that it's fantastic: throughput is excellent and signal strength is top-notch.
Then, drop a comment if you have anything to add.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just retired my Note 3 for the 8. No complaints. Just one question:
Is this normal?
XDA_RealLifeReview said:
We know how much you like to stream, ahem, "videos", and so cellular data is mega-important. Rate this thread to express how you think the Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note 8's LTE performs. A higher rating indicates that it's fantastic: throughput is excellent and signal strength is top-notch.
Then, drop a comment if you have anything to add.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just retired my Note 3 for the 8. No complaints. Just one question:
Is this normal?
I hate this phone. My data service was bad before, even worse now. My Note 2, 3 and 5 were MUCH better than this phone. Even my kids have trouble with their Galaxy S8s.
data isn't the problem with sprint. its voice service that sux. my lte is usually at least 30 up to 50 on the average
Average speeds I get now range from 3-10bps. Sometimes I find a fast tower but most are just slow as it gets. And the VOLTE doesn't work good on Sprint due to heavily lag. I have almost all callers telling me my phone is cutting out. Oh well. Cheap service cost then you get cheap service.
I agree with others.
My service -- voice and data -- were better with my Note 3, which I just upgraded from. Both on Sprint and both in the same areas. I suspect Calling Plus is the culprit but it's the only reason I finally gave up on the Note 3 and upgraded.
Sorry to bring a, "old post back to life" but, I can honestly say, being on the Note 8, I have HAD the FASTEST network speed so far on any previous device. I had the Note 2, 3, 4, 5 and note on the Note 8. I'm running 4G LTE @ 125.63 MBPS download speed inside, with a upload with 32.35 MBPS using the Speedtest application. On WiFi I'm running 968 MBPS download speed and a upload of 812.12 MBPS. (Google Fiber 1 Terabyte). I am on the latest and greatest BRA8 Firmware. I was on Oreo but upgraded to Bootloader V3 Nougat 7.1.1. Waiting on a official Oreo build pushed out.
4 to 5 bars , rarely 3.
My service is Terrible at my home, and most rural areas, almost unusable. Suck on Roam a lot. But in city areas/ town its great. Sometimes i get 50+mbps down.. Not at home though unfortunately at home like 100k
Bee using it for a week now. Works wonderfully at home and at work. I have not seen any connection issues.
EDIT - Sorry, wrong forum. I get faster speeds with my Note 10 than my Note 8.
I love the speeds I get since Sprint upgraded the Atlanta area, much faster than it used to be! Wifi speeds are what they should be too.
The first screen shot is from earlier when I saw this thread, the other 2 are older. I looked through my previous results and have quite a few over 100mbps, I just posted a few of them.
I usually get between 50-80 at home, haven't broken 100 yet from inside my house. My Note 8 is consistently 10-15 slower over LTE and Wifi.
Sent from my Galaxy Note 10 using XDA Labs
Related
Has anybody else noticed that the N5 seems to have worse reception especially compared with the Nexus 4?
It seems like on average, the N4 outperforms the N5 by ~5-8 dBm (I'm testing on T-Mobile). Unfortunately for me, in some areas, that's enough to drop me to HSPA coverage.
Have had the note 2, note 3, and note 4. Recently gave up on the note 4 because of the camera having focusing issues and the GPS losing signal constantly. Went to the lg g4 because of the camera being amazing and the GPS actually working and staying locked for an entire 90 minute trip. Reception with the note 4 was also garbage. The lg g4 pulls T-Mobile in with no problem. Kind of missing the note format and haven't seen any reviews talk about GPS and cell reception. So those that have the note 5 can you chime in on the above mentioned points?
I went from note 3. Which had horrid gps drop outs and not accurate lock. Note 5 locks quick and more accurate with mo drops. As for cell recdption its about the same as note 3 perhaps a tad bit better.
We know how much you like to stream, ahem, "videos", and so cellular data is mega-important. Rate this thread to express how you think the Alcatel Idol 4S's LTE performs. A higher rating indicates that it's fantastic: throughput is excellent and signal strength is top-notch.
Then, drop a comment if you have anything to add.
XDA_RealLifeReview said:
We know how much you like to stream, ahem, "videos", and so cellular data is mega-important. Rate this thread to express how you think the Alcatel Idol 4S's LTE performs. A higher rating indicates that it's fantastic: throughput is excellent and signal strength is top-notch.
Then, drop a comment if you have anything to add.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
For Idol 4:
The cellular signal isn't the best. I use a MetroPCS phone in my room with the same bands and it gets better signal. on the MetroPCS (T-Mobile) network. The Alcatel on MetroPCS using the same bands gets significantly worse signal and drop outs much more often. Granted my model is designed for the Cricket Wireless (AT&T) network still... it has the correct bands for MetroPCS. I'd give it a 5 out of 10 for Network signal.
For the 4S:
I use the T-Mobile network for this one. Strong signal when available. When available is emphasized as far as the handset goes, NOT the network itself. Why? I also have the Moto E 2015 LTE as well and it holds a signal EVERYWHERE I would go. But the 4S would literally drop to zero in certain restaurants, public bathrooms, had trouble holding on a signal in my old home's basement and allegedly dead zones around the community college I am employed at.
None of these places are issues when I place my T-Mobile sim into the Moto E.
atrain2324 said:
For the 4S:
I use the T-Mobile network for this one. Strong signal when available. When available is emphasized as far as the handset goes, NOT the network itself. Why? I also have the Moto E 2015 LTE as well and it holds a signal EVERYWHERE I would go. But the 4S would literally drop to zero in certain restaurants, public bathrooms, had trouble holding on a signal in my old home's basement and allegedly dead zones around the community college I am employed at.
None of these places are issues when I place my T-Mobile sim into the Moto E.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree, service does seem less then stellar with this phone, I have the Cricket variant though.
Cricket over AT&T and have no signal quality problems
We know how much you like to stream, ahem, "videos", and so cellular data is mega-important. Rate this thread to express how you think the Huawei P10 Plus's LTE performs. A higher rating indicates that it's fantastic: throughput is excellent and signal strength is top-notch.
Then, drop a comment if you have anything to add.
No one?
Sent from my LG-H990 using Tapatalk
Signal strength is very good. One of the reason I choose this over other flagship.
Definitely appears to hold coverage better than my previous LG G4, LG G3 and Samsung S3. I have coverage in areas that I didn't previously on 2 different networks although I didn't conduct side by side tests. To be honest I wasn't expecting this. I would never have thought that one manufacturer would produce a device that did significantly better than other manufacturers because don't they all use the same radio chipsets from someone like Qualcomm and presumably antenna design is pretty standard? If you were to ask me now how this is possible I'd take a guess that Huawei (largest telecoms equipment manufacturer in the world apparently) have gained a lot of experience from making things like mobile hotspots and mast equipment.
Huawei is a major player in the networking industry. For sure they would put some of their great tech inside the phones.
We know how much you like to stream, ahem, "videos", and so cellular data is mega-important. Rate this thread to express how you think the Xiaomi Mi 6's LTE performs. A higher rating indicates that it's fantastic: throughput is excellent and signal strength is top-notch.
Then, drop a comment if you have anything to add.
No one?
As I'm using MI6 since June. It has very good coverage always 4G but never saw 4G+ that's the strange thing. Other than that sometimes I have H+ where my Galaxy s8+ had 4G with 3/4 bars (I have both phones).
I got fulltime 4G+ maximum troughput on my Mi6, personally it has a better signal and troughput performance then my oneplus 3T.
hi i just switched from oneplus 3T to xiaomi mi6, and my reception is slighlty less good actually, but its noticable in tunnels and stairwells, my OP3T would keep good reception but the mi6 drops signal sometimes.
Does LTE work on T-Mobile in the US? I have heard reviews where only HSPA speeds work.
devsk said:
Does LTE work on T-Mobile in the US? I have heard reviews where only HSPA speeds work.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nobody using this phone in the US? IMO, its a pretty good phone, right up there with OP5. And I expected more folks in the US using it.