Related
Discontinuation Notice + Source Opened!
This project is now discontinued, as I have moved on to Android 4.X (ICS) which has perfect built-in RTL support.
I will still provide basic support as much as I can, but if your device has it, I recommend you move on to ICS as well.
If you wish to continue working on this project and improving, you have my blessing (as long as you credit me, of course).
Source code is available here, but be-ware: it's an undocumented, unorganized mess.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Android RTL Auto-Patcher
Version 1.5
The Problem
It's a well known fact that while Android has Hebrew and Arabic fonts, it has a problem with Right-To-Left alignment. The problem: It doesn't exist.
Sure, MOST programs display text correctly, but mix text and numbers in the same line and you'll get reverse numbers (123 appears as 321), and in SOME Google apps (like Gmail and Maps) the words themselves are reverse (so 'apple' appears as 'elppa').
The Old Solution
There is a solution for this, however you have to create a separate patch for every build, because the patch changes files in the build's framework. It's a relatively easy process, but for people who change builds constantly, it can get tiresome.
This Program
This program detects if a build is compatible with the patch, and if so - creates it almost automatically and install it back to the phone. A process that took about 10 minutes to complete before and required some knowhow, now takes only seconds and requires almost no prior experience!
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
ProTools
The ProTools are a collection of tools that will allow you to patch ROMs manually either directly to ZIP files, to the phone, or to framework files. It will also allow you to push, pull, extract and manipulate files to and from ROMs of all kinds, with great flexibility and ease!
Compatibility
This program is intended for use with custom DEODEXED roms of Android versions 2.1 and above. The program will inform you if your build is not deodexed.
The program will allow you to either push the fix directly to the device or flash via recovery.
WARNING: Some 'squashedFS' builds have been reported not to be compatible, and the program can not - at the moment - detect those!
Warnings
This program is in Beta stage!
Many features have not been thoroughly tested and error handling is far from perfect.
It may give some errors, crash or stall - at which point I ask that you please send me your log.txt (to find it, click 'About' and then 'Locate Log') or as an upload in this thread.
I do request - however - that you try to be as specific as possible regarding your build, your computer, and what caused the problem.
Also, if you include the log here, please enclose it in 'code' tags.
Requirements
You MUST have Microsoft .Net Framework 4 installed for this to work.
You will also need the latest Java Runtime Environment
You must also have the ADB drivers already installed:
In Windows Vista/7, just connect the phone and let Windows Update do it's thing.
In Windows XP, you need to manually install the drivers available here.
ADB itself comes with the program, so you don't need that.
How to use
If available, boot into recovery (recommended for non-rooted devices!)
Connect your phone to USB and make sure the computer recognizes it
Run the program, and select 'Test Connection'
After connection has been made, if the build is compatible - select the correct Sense version. The program WILL attempt to auto-detect, but it's not 100% reliable, so please confirm that the program detected correctly
Select distribution method:
Push to Device (Recommended) - does simply that, the program will attempt to automatically patch the phone for you.
Create ZIP - creates a ZIP file that's flashable through Recovery (Clockwork Recovery Mod). Will also offer you to save the ZIP on the SD card (doesn't even require mounting USB).
Show File - will just show you the patched 'framework.jar' so you can do whatever you want with it.
Select any additional options you might be interested in (Gingerbread keyboard, for example - is a fixed Gingerbread keyboard with fixed Hebrew RTL that is compatible with the patch the program installs. It should work on 2.2 devices as well, and replaces the stock Android keyboard).
GO GO GO!
Reporting bugs
Please be sure to provide the name and type of your build when giving feedback or reporting bugs. For better bug-squashing, please also provide your log.txt file, which you will find in the application's directory.
Also, even if you experienced no bugs, your logs will be appreciated.
Finally, if you put the the log content in your post, PLEASE encode it with 'code' tags.
If you have any additional non-bug-related questions, feel free to ask them in this thread. I will do my best to improve this program as time goes by.
Thank you, and good luck!
Download
Always available here:
Changelog, Known Issues and Planned Features
Changelog
1.5 - 14/08/2011
Advanced build numbers to 1.5 due to massive advances in the program.
Added global error handling - might not solve ALL problems, but will hopefully help avoid unlogged crashes.
When "Install Gingerbread Keyboard" and "Create Zip" are both selected, it will now also install the keyboard on the Zip.
The program will now also try to mount sd-ext in addition to system before patching (as will the flashable Zip).
When patching fails, the program will offer you to save the patched file to your computer for use with ProTools.
In the 'About' window, added the option to find the log file on your computer (for easier error reports).
Other minor undocumented improvements.
Completely overhauled the ProTools:
Offline Patching: Allows patching ROM Zips or 'framework.jar' files directly.
Manual Operations: Pretty much what ProTools was before, except with an easier straight-forward interface and with the option to operate on a ROM Zip file, from your phone, or directly from a 'framework.jar' file.
Added the option to manually push or pull anything to or from anywhere (with specific buttons for 'framework.jar', 'framework-res.apk' (for theming) and 'build.prop'.
Added the option to manually patch the Keyboard to the phone or the a ROM Zip.
1.1.2 - 20/07/2011 - minor update
Improved Sense 3.0 Detection
Updated build detection strings
1.1.0 - 14/06/2011
Fixed critical interface bug that caused the operation compelte / restart prompt not to appear if 'Push' was selected.
1.1.0 - 14/06/2011
Removed support for SD/SDRAM based builds
Instead, created three distribution methods: Push file, Create flashable zip or just Display file
Flashable zip will be flashable via recovery, and will attempt to push itself to the device's SD card.
Version 1.0.0 Beta
Build Detection:
Improved build properties detection
Vastly improved Sense detection mechanism
Sense versions now distinct by Sense version
Added Sense 2.1 (Gingerbread) support
'Pro Tools' (Beta) - Every single function of the patcher can now be called on seperately and manually.
Changed versioning scheme. Version 1.0.0 to be assigned.
Updated core framework files (fixed a lot of stability issues in Sense2.0 builds)
Planned Features
I plan to seriously improve the RTL fix itself in the near future, but since I lack the knowledge to do so myself, I'm waiting for some new methods currently under development by the excellent devs at iAndroid.co.il to be released.
I do plan to release to program's source code eventually, it's just such a mess at this point that I'm more ashamed of it than anything else.
I also plan to include a logcat monitor. Because the patch causes the phone to rebuild dalvik cache, first boot after patching often takes a VERY LONG time, and some users wrongfully assume their phone is frozen. I plan to include a logcat monitor that will hopefully know to differentiate between bootloops, errors, and dalvik rebuilding, so users can tell if their phone is actually frozen or just working. If this works, I might release this as an actual separate program.
Known Issues
Build 1.1.0 - If 'Push' is selected, when patching process finishes, no message is displayed and the program doesn't prompt to restart. - fixed in 1.1.1
There is hardly any error handling in the ProTools section. If they are called with no device available, it MAY freeze/crash the program. Will be fixed in upcoming release.
Fixes for Squashed filesystem roms do not work! Mostly.
Error handling is STILL utter ****e, may give unexpected errors (or not at all and just fail altogether).
If HTC Sync is installed and active, stuff may go nuts all around (as of 0.0.5 this is detected by the program and warns user).
Credits
Program and Graphics created by Elad Avron using Visual Studio 2010 Express.
ZIP Functions created by Elad Avron using free libraries from the IC#Code group, available at http://www.icsharpcode.net/opensource/sharpziplib/
Special thanks:
From HTCAddicts.com: Ronenpg, Ohect.
From XDA-Developers.com: TheAgent1982, silverbluem, mdeejay and the entire HD2 dev crew
From iAndroid.co.il: Classicaldude (Original fix, the hero of RTL!), Dudyk (Original fix), rasmux (Modified fix), Liavk1 (partial SenseHD fix), Avicohh (Gingerbread Keyboard), N1Man (RTL fix for Gingerbread Keyboard).
Keyboard fix by Avicohh and N1Man (from iAndoird.co.il)
If it will work man i'll give you a real big THANKS!
Just tried it V 001 , successfully connected + fetched framework+modified then pushed classes back....
log attached
PC - Win7 + net 4
LeoAndroid - Desire Z ....
Device restarted, passed the first splash (hTC) screen, took very long on the animation one, then started !
Changes :
1-No right side line alignement..
2-Numbers are still wrongly placed..
Tested and it workes!
Got an error in middle of the prosses but in the end it did what it was supposed to do.
Sent from my HTC HD2 using XDA App
congratulation
Congratz of your new Project!
I will give it a shot as soon as i can
my teset here ..
this is my test in the log file attached
thx
I appreciate your efforts
reverse numbers problem still exits
big thanks
Voffchik said:
Tested and it workes!
Got an error in middle of the prosses but in the end it did what it was supposed to do.
Sent from my HTC HD2 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks
Can you send me your log.txt?
I'd like to see what the error was.
Sup3r said:
I appreciate your efforts
reverse numbers problem still exits
big thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can I get build type and log file please?
Thank you
jaguaralani said:
Just tried it V 001 , successfully connected + fetched framework+modified then pushed classes back....
log attached
PC - Win7 + net 4
LeoAndroid - Desire Z ....
Device restarted, passed the first splash (hTC) screen, took very long on the animation one, then started !
Changes :
1-No right side line alignement..
2-Numbers are still wrongly placed..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The log indicates that you did everything right and experienced no errors, so there are two things I'd like you to try:
In the 'Toolbox' dir in the app dir, the leftover files from the creation process are left. Try pushing framework.jar manually to the device.
If that doesn't work, try putting 'classes_new.dex' in 'framework.jar', renaming it to 'classes.dex' (thus replacing the old one), and repeat step 1.
If that doesn't work something went wrong in the patching process itself, i.e. my source files aren't good for your build (they should be), the compression failed, or any step in between. Let me know if the leftover framework.jar and classes_new.dex solve the problem, and we'll try to isolate the problem from there.
Thank you all for helping
Thank you
Thank you very much for your great work.
The alignment works great for Arabic, but the thing with Arabic is that letters need to be connected with each other when they are in one word. From what I gather, this means needing to change stuff in libskia.so and libwebcore.so (both in /system/lib/).
For more info, you can check out the efforts to add Arabic support for many Android devices at http://ardoid.com/
NSider said:
The alignment works great for Arabic, but the thing with Arabic is that letters need to be connected with each other when they are in one word. From what I gather, this means needing to change stuff in libskia.so and libwebcore.so (both in /system/lib/).
For more info, you can check out the efforts to add Arabic support for many Android devices at http://ardoid.com/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, I understand it's a problem with a lot of software, not only Android.
I will try to implement patching of Arabic characters in the future, once the program has a more solid base.
this is my log
my build is : MDJ's gingerbread CyanogenMod 7 v. 2.1 [A2SD+][GRH78][RMNET][Kernel: MDJ S10.2 OC
wating the Arabic characters fix
thanks :0
Ambious said:
Thanks
Can you send me your log.txt?
I'd like to see what the error was.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I sent it yesterday via PM
I sent the log file + screenshot
U said u'll look in to it
Sent from my HTC HD2 using XDA App
Voffchik said:
I sent it yesterday via PM
I sent the log file + screenshot
U said u'll look in to it
Sent from my HTC HD2 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Right, sorry, my bad
I worked around your reported error in v.0.0.2, it was a little oversight I had in interface design.
Thank you for the report
Sent from my Android HTC HD2 using XDA App
Sup3r said:
my build is : MDJ's gingerbread CyanogenMod 7 v. 2.1 [A2SD+][GRH78][RMNET][Kernel: MDJ S10.2 OC
wating the Arabic characters fix
thanks :0
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you for the log.
From the log it seems like there were no errors and that everything went as planned. I'm using the same build as you, so I know it's compatible.
What I'd like you to try, if it's not too much hassle, is this:
In the 'toolbox' dir in the app dir, there are leftover files from the process. Push 'frameowkr.jar' to your device's "/system/framework/" using:
Code:
adb push framework.jar /system/framework/
and reboot.
If that solves it, the issue was with the push command (I currently have no method to actually detect if it was successful or not, I hope to fix that in future version).
If even that doesn't solve it, open 'framework.jar' using any zip/rar program, delete 'classes.dex' from it, insert 'classes_new.dex' (from the toolbox dir) into the 'framework.jar' file, and rename to 'classes.dex'. Push to the device, restart, and try again.
If you don't mind doing those things, it would help me greatly to detect where the patching process failed.
Thank you so much, and I promise to include Arabic fix as soon as the program structure is solid enough!
Tried V 002
PC - Win7 + net 4
LeoAndroid - Desire Z ....
Log attached
changes
Nothing
jaguaralani said:
Tried V 002
PC - Win7 + net 4
LeoAndroid - Desire Z ....
Log attached
changes
Nothing
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, well, v002 changes nothing in the process, only the interface.
I'd like you to try, if not too much hassle - to push the framework file manually and reboot.
If that doesn't work, try to put 'classes_new.dex' into 'framework.jar' and rename it to 'classes.dex' and push framework.jar again.
If any of that works then I can narrow down the issue.
On another note, I got reports from other people using DesireZ that the process worked for them, so I know it's compatible, it's just a localized issue.
This doesn't specifically belong to NAND development.
Moved.
(Regardless of that, it's a wonderful project).
Zip Builder is a stand-alone Windows exe (ZipBuild.exe) that can be used to build and sign Android zip-based installers from Windows folders. All required components to build and sign a zip installer are included - no additional files or software are required. The only requirement is that you have a current version of Java installed on your system. Zip Builder can be used on both shell-script and edify-script based installers and performs the proper build and signing methods, accordingly.
Although it's highly recommended to install the software using the Windows Installer (see below), the stand-alone exe is all that's required to use the program. The program command line options are as follows:
ZipBuild.exe <option1> <option2...> <*Folder Name>
Valid options are as follows:
'm' or '-manual': Manually select folder to be processed
's' or '-signed': Append '-signed' to the output file name
'5' or '-md5': Generate corresponding MD5 checksum file
'c' or '-confirm': Confirm options before building
'g' or '-gitinclude': include .git folders and related files
* Ignored when using manual selection mode
OPTIONS EXPLAINED
'm' or '-manual': In Manual mode you will be presented with a dialog box where you can manually select the folder containing the files to be processed. *When using Manual mode, the folder name will be ignored if it was provided in the command line
's' or '-signed': This option will append '-signed' to the output file name. For example: Folder name 'UPDATE-adb.Installer.v1.0.36' would produce a signed zip file named 'UPDATE-adb.Installer.v1.0.36-signed.zip'.
'5' or '-md5': This option will create a separate, corresponding MD5 checksum file that can be used to verify file integrity in TWRP or with other Windows checksum utilities.
'c' or '-confirm': When this option is used, you will be presented with a dialog box where you can confirm (or change) the 2 options above. If either (or both) options above have been specified on the command line, the checkboxes will be pre-selected accordingly. Once you're satisfied with your selections, click the 'Build Zip File' button to begin the zip building and signing process.
'g' or '-gitinclude': This option will include any .git folders and related files (.git, .gitignore, and .gitattributes) that are excluded from the zip file by default. [Should rarely be needed, if ever]
ZIP BUILDER SETTINGS MANAGER
Zip Builder Settings Manager (ZipBuildSettings.exe) is an optional companion app that can be used to manage the settings and options (shown below) for Zip Builder:
You can choose to create Windows Context (Right-Click) menus that will allow you to build a signed zip installer simply by right-clicking on a folder name. Folder names that end in '20YYMMDD' or '20YYxxxx' as well as folder names that begin with 'UPDATE' are supported in Windows 7 and above. You can also enable the option to build from any folder by holding the SHIFT key while selecting the folder.
You can choose when to display the confirmation dialog
You can choose when to append '-signed' to output file names
You can choose when to create md5 checksum files
You can choose to include all .git folders and related files (see above)
DATE CODE FEATURE
If you're building from a Windows folder name that ends in '20YYMMDD' or '20YYxxxx', Zip Builder will give you the option to change or update the date code portion of the file name before building the zip (it will also suggest the current date's date code - YYYYMMDD). And, if you're building a zip installer that includes a g.prop file (found in many GApps packages), the installer will read the date code from the 'ro.addon.*_version=' property and automatically use it in place of the date code from the Windows folder name.
WINDOWS INSTALLER
As mentioned above, you'll have the best user experience if you install Zip Builder using the Windows installer. It runs in standard user mode (no Admin access required or requested) and installs the Zip Builder and Zip Builder Settings exe's in: 'C:Users<user>AppDataRoamingZip Builder'. The installer will create a program group and shortcuts in the Windows start menu (and optionally on the desktop) that can be used to launch Zip Builder in 'manual selection mode', where the user can manually select the folder they wish to build. The installer will automatically run Zip Builder Settings Manager at the conclusion of the install where you can configure the settings and options to your personal preference.
Uninstalling Zip Builder from the Windows Uninstall menu will remove all traces of the software from your system. And, since Zip Builder, Zip Builder Settings Manager, or its installer will NEVER prompt for UAC access, you can be confident that it's not touching the Windows operating system. Of course, all source code is available if you want to check for yourself - you can even build it for yourself, if you want!
TECHNICAL NOTES
Version 4.3+ of Zip Builder includes the new ZipSigner 2.1 Java executable that was rewritten from the ground up by @topjohnwu for use in his Magisk root management software. This change will allow you to build the largest zip installer on even the smallest 32-bit machine. I was able to build a 1.0+GB shell-script based installed on a 32-bit Windows XP machine with only 1GB of RAM.
If you have had java heap size issues building zip installers in the past, version 4.3+ of Zip Builder should completely eliminate these problems.
XDA:DevDB Information
Zip Builder, Tool/Utility for all devices (see above for details)
Contributors
TKruzze
Version Information
Status: Stable
Current Stable Version: 4.5.2
Stable Release Date: 2020-09-06
Created 2018-01-23
Last Updated 2020-09-06
Anti-Virus False-Positives
ANTI-VIRUS FALSE-POSITIVES
There have been reports of false-positive flaggings of Zip Builder and/or the Windows installer. While I can, personally, assure you that there's no malware included in Zip Builder or its installer, I also understand that there may be some concern with using software that's been flagged on your machine.
To allay your concerns as best as possible, I have included 100% of the original source code for you to inspect and/or build the software yourself. Again, there is no possibility of malware as I do all of my compiling on a clean machine that is not connected to the internet. I have also submitted all 4 Windows executables to the major AV inspection service on the net. Below are the results of these inspections:
VirusTotal.com
ZipBuild.exe (32 bit) 7/68
ZipBuild.exe (64 bit) 2/68
ZipBuildSettings.exe 4/67
Zip Builder_4.5.2_Setup.exe 1/69
Sources & Acknowledgements / Recent Changes
SOURCES AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Zip Builder has existed for me since way back in 2013 when I started developing GApps packages. I've added features here and there and finally decided to share it. After privately sharing with @osm0sis, I received a lot of very constructive feedback and based on this, I polished the interface and added some new features. A big thank you to @osm0sis for this feedback. Without his input, it would look a lot clunkier than it does today.
All source code is provided, however, it's only appropriate for me to publicly acknowledge that this work includes code and binaries from several third party sources. Below is a complete list of these sources. You will also find this list as well as the actual code and binaries in the Source Code Zip file available for download.
Zip Builder
------------
Zip Builder is Copyright (c) 2013-2020 by @TKruzze
Original source code and compiled executables can be found on
XDA Developers. Zip Builder also includes code and compiled
executables from the sources listed below:
ZipSigner
---------------
ZipSigner is Copyright (c) 2016-2020, John Wu @topjohnwu)
Original source code and license can be found at:
https://github.com/topjohnwu/Magisk
The version of ZipSigner used in Zip Builder was built by @topjohnwu using the source code above and optimized using ProGuard optimizations
Info-ZIP
----------
Info-ZIP is Copyright (c) 1990-2007 Info-ZIP
Original License can be found at:
http://www.info-zip.org/license.html
Downloads can be found at:
ftp://ftp.info-zip.org/pub/infozip/win32/
Original source code can be found at:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/infozip/
Hashutils
----------
The MD5 Checksum code and executable are from code.kliu.org
Original source code and compiled executables can be found at:
http://code.kliu.org/misc/hashutils/
SUMMARY OF RECENT CHANGES
SEPTEMBER 6, 2020 - v4.5.2
Fixed RegEx bug (oversight) that only supported automatic folder renaming through the year 2019. Now we're good through the year 2029.
As always, the best and easiest way to update is to simply install the new version using the Windows installer without uninstalling the previous version. All of your settings and options will be retained
NOVEMBER 1, 2018 - v4.5.1
Updated the cleanup function to also include removal of the SignAPK*.tmp files that are created in the %TEMP% folder during the signing process.
- Thanks to @osm0sis for reporting
MARCH 26, 2018 - v4.4.0
Updated the ZipSigner java executable to v2.1-min. This version is significantly smaller than v2.1 (458K vs 4.0MB) and was built by @topjohnwu, himself, using using ProGuard optimizations
Recompiled Zip Builder Settings Manager (ZipBuildSettings.exe) without UPX compression to try and further minimize AV false-positives
Windows installer now built using lzma2/max compression and no longer uses solid compression. This was done to optimize installation speed and further minimize AV false-positives
MARCH 25, 2018 - v4.3.0
Updated signing code with the new ZipSigner 2.1 Java executable that was rewritten from the ground up by @topjohnwu for use in his Magisk root management software. This change will allow you to build the largest zip installer on even the smallest 32-bit machine. I was able to build a 1.0+GB shell-script based installer on a 32-bit Windows XP machine with only 1GB of RAM.
- Thanks, of course, to @topjohnwu, but also to @osm0sis for the heads up on its existence
- Thanks to @jenslody for building it for inclusion here.
Since memory and java heap size issues are now resolved with the above change, I have removed all memory and java heap size checks from Zip Builder. The above change also allowed me to remove the separate test key files (testkey.pk8 and testkey.x509.pem), signapk.jar, zipadjust, and minsignapk.jar executables as their functions are all now contained in the new ZipSigner 2.1 Java executable mentioned above.
Installer will now clean up its 'temp folder' files before displaying the 'COMPLETED' message. On slower systems this should reduce the delay when selecting the 'Close' button after Zip Builder completes the signing process.
- Thanks to @osm0sis for reporting and helping track down the issue
Zip Builder is now built without UPX compression on the Windows exe's. This was done to try and reduce false-positives that may be reported by your AV software. If you're still having AV hits, please read the ANTI-VIRUS FALSE-POSITIVES section on the OP.
Fixed bug in installer that would corrupt the context (right-click) menu settings on an update (not initial) installation.
- Thanks to @osm0sis for reporting and helping track down the issue
Excellent! Glad to see a public release! I was using Zip Builder all day to prepare my latest round of updates for my Odds and Ends thread, and it couldn't be easier!
It's been great working with you again @TKruzze, I knew you couldn't stay away from contributing awesome things to the community for too long.
Looks very cool! You're inspiring me to clean up and release a tool that I built which has no current equivalent.
Seeing as this uses Java, what would it take to make it work under linux? As a staunch Linux/osx user who only runs a windows VM for flashing his Samsung with odin, I would love to integrate this into my workflow, but without linux or Mac support for me personally that will be difficult ?
This is an incredible contribution. Thank you for making this public and for your hard work!
partcyborg said:
Seeing as this uses Java, what would it take to make it work under linux?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The only thing I'm actually using Java for is the signing portion of the process. There's no real way I can think of to easily port the rest of it to Linux. Thanks for the feedback!
wow thanks @TKruzze :good:
this will be really helpful for my future firmware updates ✌
Ok im very very new to all this but does this make zips that are flashable in twrp? Im wanting to learn how to do that if you guys could point me in the right direction id be thankful.
papasmurf879 said:
Ok im very very new to all this but does this make zips that are flashable in twrp? Im wanting to learn how to do that if you guys could point me in the right direction id be thankful.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yes
you need update-script and update-binary along other files
TKruzze said:
The only thing I'm actually using Java for is the signing portion of the process. There's no real way I can think of to easily port the rest of it to Linux. Thanks for the feedback!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My mistake. Thanks for the explanation! I'm sure then that this will run in wine however, I may give it a shot at some point. If I do I will let you know.
kamilmirza said:
yes
you need update-script and update-binary along other files
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you for replying im doing searches right now trying to figure it out.
papasmurf879 said:
Thank you for replying im doing searches right now trying to figure it out.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Advanced, but check out my thread here and the linked resources: [DEV][TEMPLATE] Complete Shell Script Flashable Zip Replacement + Signing [SCRIPT]
The EDIFY references/resources are the place to start. :good:
Can i create flashable zips of my apks. I Flash custom roms very often and some apps are needed as my daily driver so can i make a flashable zip of those apk file and flash via this tool
Ash225 said:
Can i create flashable zips of my apks. I Flash custom roms very often and some apps are needed as my daily driver so can i make a flashable zip of those apk file and flash via this tool
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Have you tried this?
This tool in this thread is for making a zip if you already have the components (updater script and binary).
madbat99 said:
Have you tried this?
This tool in this thread is for making a zip if you already have the components (updater script and binary).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks but i knew about this app i want to creat zips from my computer and not from my phone thats why i asked the question thanks for your prompt reply
This looks like this tool that will, hopefully, be helpful for one of my other little projects that I had to put aside till I finish catching up with some other projects/developments that's already on my plate.
I already have a working set of script commands for safely disabling the Google Play Protect but, i will need a medium/delivery system before I can release it and this looks promising to help with this.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I DO NOT provide support via PM unless asked/requested by myself. PLEASE keep it in the threads where everyone can share.
Did you just give me a Trojan? Because Defender says so and even VirusTotal was positive about this. Beware about using this software!
Djentist said:
Did you just give me a Trojan? Because Defender says so and even VirusTotal was positive about this. Beware about using this software!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, I'm sure one of the most respected developers on XDA would do that. I'd be more worried about those antivirus softwares you're using than anything.
Djentist said:
Did you just give me a Trojan? Because Defender says so and even VirusTotal was positive about this. Beware about using this software!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Definitely not a very responsible post to make. There's nothing wrong about reporting your findings, but to make an accusation like this is a bit irresponsible. I also seriously doubt that Microsoft Defender identified this as a virus (as you claim).
Anyways, here are the facts: There is no virus or malicious behavior. Below are the actual results of scans by VirusTotal and VirScan
Zip Builder_4.2.1_Setup.exe
VirusTotal.com (0/65)
VirScan.org (1/39)
ZipBuildSettings.exe
VirusTotal.com (2/66)
VirScan.org (2/39)
ZipBuild.exe (32 bit)
VirusTotal.com (2/66)
VirScan.org (2/39)
ZipBuild.exe (64 bit)
VirusTotal.com (1/65)
VirScan.org (1/39)
Based on personal experience, ANY file that is not signed with a Microsoft Root Certificate and/or uses UPX compression is going to produce false positives with the heuristics deployed by some of these 'so called' anti-virus software products in the marketplace. I'm actually surprised the numbers are as low as they are.
All that said, if you are not comfortable using the software, fine. But please exercise responsible reporting if you have questions or concerns. A big part of the reason for me releasing all the source code is to avoid having to defend myself from people making exactly this type of assertion.
version: 4.9.4
Last update of the program in the header: 04/06/2020
Developer: kory-vadim
For the program to function, root privileges are required.
Install: flash as Magisk module
Short description:
Unpacking, assembling and converting system (vendor) {. Img} {. New.dat} {. New.dat.br}, mounting raw.images, gluing the system.img broken into parts into a single image (from the firmware for Qfil), unpacking payload.bin, repackaging boot (recovery) .img, extracting file_contexts from boot.img (android <= 8.1), and converting file_contexts.bin on the phone.
Description:
To unpack images, you can use a phone with android 5+.
The system make_ext4fs is used from the phone’s firmware, so on a phone with android 6+ (or better 7), you can collect system.img images from android 5+.
We need root rights, busybox (needed before UKA version: 4.4 inclusive) and enough space for the images themselves and unpacking them in ./data.
Before flashing versions 4.6, 4.7, delete the old version and flash the corresponding archive via twrp.
In the kitchen there is a utility AIK - Android Image Kitchen for repacking boot (recovery) .img.
If, for some reason, you do not want to flash AIK-mobile (or, for example: already installed), then delete the file "AIK.Mobile.Installer.v3.4.zip" from the archive and flash "unpack-android_new_4.6. zip "without this file.
After flashing, install the terminal emulator (if it is not already installed), and check the box for UTF-8 in its settings.
To start the kitchen, in the terminal enter:
su
menu
Go to the item: "Extract file_contexts", and select the subitem: "Install configuration", if this is not done, then the conversion file_contexts.bin -> file_contexts will not work.
You need to run the configuration installation only once.
*In version 4.5 and above it should work without applying this item.
And then enter the numbers corresponding to the desired action.
To extract file_contexts, put boot.img in the folder: /data/local/UnpackerContexts.
To unpack .img images, you need to put system.img or vendor.img in the folder: /data/local/UnpackerSystem, and select the .img file (no more than 5) for unpacking.
When unpacking, the folders will be deleted: "system", or "vendor"; files: * _fs_config and * _pack.sh from the previous unpacking.
To build the image, copy the received file_contexts to the folder: /data/local/UnpackerSystem, if for some reason it will not be in the folder, then the assembly will be performed with file_contexts obtained when unpacking the image.
If files or folders were added to the disassembled image, then before assembling it, you must enter everything added into fs_config, and only then collect it.
If there are spaces in the names of folders or files in the unpacked image, then make_ex4fs will not collect such an image until you rename the files and correct the entries in fs_config.
Therefore, adding folders and files with spaces to the unpacked image is also not possible.
In version 4.6, the write assistant in fs_config is added.
If you just deleted something, then you do not need to edit fs_config.
Also in the collected folder must be present symlinks.
Well, in terms of context, Selinux will also need to be watched, depending on what was added.
To unpack or convert .dat, .br and in other cases, you will be prompted to enter the path to the folder where the image is located (in the same folder should be system (vendor) .transfer.list).
When converting and assembling in .dat, look behind the phone screen, because in some cases you need to enter a number corresponding to the version of the android, the image being collected.
There is a choice of compression ratio for converting * .new.dat to br.
To reduce the conversion time, compression can be selected 3-5 (maximum 7).
To unpack boot (recovery) .img, put the file in the folder: /data/local/AIK-mobile, and select the file in the menu: "unzip boot"
For packaging, use the item: "pack boot".
The collected file will be located in the folder: /data/local/AIK-mobile with the name boot-output.img.
To clean the working folder, also use the corresponding item. Source and output files will not be deleted.
AIK-mobile can be completely removed from the phone directly from the menu.
To mount, use the corresponding menu item, and the raw image must be located in the folder: /data/local/UnpackerSystem.
Do not forget to unmount the image.
To remove the kitchen from the phone, go to the corresponding menu item and confirm the removal,
after confirmation, the phone will be overloaded in twrp, and after working out the script, it will be loaded into the system.
Screenshots(Gdrive): https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=1-5dSaOQKpDH4gy737gcDp-Anp0vAj_VU
Download(Gdrive): https://drive.google.com/file/d/1-nOvictMuUNXbowwn3h1lbdrkJur2jJh/view?usp=drivesdk
MOD EDIT: Link removed
..
chelghouf said:
Hello ??
First thank you for the great work ?
After downloading version 4.9.2 I found it perfect for Android ROMs modification without the need for a computer .. But it needed translation, so work began on that then I decided to add a feature to save and rebuild the ROM currently installed on the device .. This feature is tested on one device " MediaTek treble enabled " .. and on two Android systems 9 And 10 and works perfectly this feature helped me a lot to repack and share the ROM after debugging it or adding new features .. Sorry I don't have other devices to confirm the effectiveness of this feature, but the script is designed to support most versions of Android and many devices when possible .. I'm glad if you accept to add and develop this feature in the next updates .. Thank you.
This is my modded version
https://www.mediafire.com/download/x9doxd3nnd0h2ja
This is the video showing how it works
https://www.mediafire.com/download/qchspnzniikg1gw
https://ibb.co/0QjG7S8
https://ibb.co/XxJ8FPp[/QUOTE
I am having issues in using your modded version.
Please kindly guide me on how to set it up.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
..
chelghouf said:
What type of issues !
If you followed the video then, try to type menu in place of arkm, else be more specific please.
---------- Post added at 01:10 AM ---------- Previous post was at 12:49 AM ----------
This is a small update a feature removes kitchen binary files from the new build while extracting backup for sar and non sar devices.
I can't post links yet so replace @ with media fire home link
@/download/pq5obfcqhb18hpi
tested and confirmed working on 2 treble mtk devices running android 9 and 10 gsi ROMs and device stock ROM android 8.1
Previous link removed !
This is a small update
4.9.2.3
Added support for some kirin devices
@/download/o1ga3o1v4v13a0c
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you so much. It works flawlessly. Kudos Bro
chelghouf said:
What type of issues !
If you followed the video then, try to type menu in place of arkm, else be more specific please.
---------- Post added at 01:10 AM ---------- Previous post was at 12:49 AM ----------
This is a small update a feature removes kitchen binary files from the new build while extracting backup for sar and non sar devices.
I can't post links yet so replace @ with media fire home link
@/download/pq5obfcqhb18hpi
tested and confirmed working on 2 treble mtk devices running android 9 and 10 gsi ROMs and device stock ROM android 8.1
Previous link removed !
This is a small update
4.9.2.3
Added support for some kirin devices
@/download/o1ga3o1v4v13a0c
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Link not working
..
chelghouf said:
@/download/9o1t3hlgh4duied
Replace @ with media fire home link
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Dev all runs well except option 13 , kitchen not able backup vender . In my device (zuk z2 ) vender is as /factory.
Thanks
..
chelghouf said:
Thanks for feedback , It's fixed i'll give you a link when upload finish
---------- Post added at 09:38 AM ---------- Previous post was at 09:03 AM ----------
@/download/pmzfg8kvdk7to1n
This is a small fix for zuk z2 pro and plus and there is no problem to flash the final rom build.
But if you want your vendor file output name like this "factory.new.dat.br" then you have to wait.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
All custom roms(z2+) shows "vendor.new.dat.br" in zip, only they unpack in /factory partition .
..
chelghouf said:
Good, i had no idea, i hope it has been fixed.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks Dev it starts backing up & converting to zip.
..
chelghouf said:
Hello ??
First thank you for the great work ?
After downloading version 4.9.2 I found it perfect for Android ROMs modification without the need for a computer .. But it needed translation, so work began on that then I decided to add a feature to save and rebuild the ROM currently installed on the device .. This feature is tested on one device " MediaTek treble enabled " .. and on two Android systems 9 And 10 and works perfectly this feature helped me a lot to repack and share the ROM after debugging it or adding new features .. Sorry I don't have other devices to confirm the effectiveness of this feature, but the script is designed to support most versions of Android and many devices when possible .. I'm glad if you accept to add and develop this feature in the next updates .. Thank you.
This is my modded version
https://www.mediafire.com/download/x9doxd3nnd0h2ja
This is the video showing how it works
https://www.mediafire.com/download/qchspnzniikg1gw
https://ibb.co/0QjG7S8
https://ibb.co/XxJ8FPp
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
@chelghouf I keep installing it in magisk but it doesn't show up! Any hint?
..
chelghouf said:
Install from twrp
https://www.mediafire.com/download/q3lq7wz6rsdbfww
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I installed from TWRP now and it's still the same.
..
chelghouf said:
Type menu and use it from the link I gave you to get all the new features.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's still the original Russian one, should I uninstall the original one? [Thank you for your attention]
Yes, uninstalling the original one fixed it, let's try it out.
..
**** Disclaimer: I'm not responsible if you destroy your device. Use at your own risk!!! ****
GrapheneOS is an open source privacy and security focused mobile OS with Android app compatibility. It's focused on the research and development of privacy and security technology including substantial improvements to sandboxing, exploit mitigations and the permission model. Currently it is based on AOSP.
Link: (Mod Edit: Link removed)
Important information:
1. This ROM does NOT include Gapps or Google Play Service and hasn't Signature Spoofing Support. If you rely on the mentioned things this Rom isn't for you.
2. I take the official releases, modify the install script and include a pre-patched Magisk boot image. I'm not in contact with the GrapheneOS dev which is the reason why i mark this ROM as Unofficial.
3. Due of point two: Please don't ask questions on the official channels as reddit. Leave comments etc here on this thread.
4. You need a unlocked bootloader to flash this rom and must have adb+fastboot installed on your computer. If this is not the case download it from here: https://developer.android.com/studio/releases/platform-tools
I plan to make unofficial releases when new official builds are available.
Features:
AOSP 10
Built-in Firewall
Built-in local backup function (it's not working on all Apps; some doesn't support it)
Improved MAC Randomization
Hardened Kernel
Expanded Permissions (sensors)
Force calls to 4G only
Bugs
- Receiving text over verizon sim doesn't work reliable. Thx @wolfu11 for reporting.
Download: (Mod Edit: Link removed)
Installation:
Notice 1: The First-time installation will wipe your data. Backup first (i recommend this too when you follow the update instructions to be safe)
Notice 2: I recommend to have the newest stock firmware before the First-time installation
First-time installation:
1. Download the zip from the linked download page and unzip it on your computer
2. Copy the following files into the plattform-tools folder:
-> coral zip
-> bootloader img
-> radio img
-> flash-all_first_install.bat for Windows or flash-all_first_install.sh for Linux
3. Boot your phone into fastboot mode and verify that the phone is recognized from your computer
4. In Terminal (Linux) or Powershell (Windows): Run the appropriate script
5. Install the Magisk Manager App
10. Be happy with a rooted GrapheneOS
Update:
Notice: I assume that fastboot+adb is still installed on your computer.
1. Download the newest zip from the linked download page and unzip it on your computer
2. Copy the following files into the plattform-tools folder:
-> coral zip
-> bootloader img
-> radio img
-> flash-all.bat for Windows or flash-all.sh for Linux
If your computer asks you to overwrite the current files in the plattform-tools folder, confirm it.
3. Boot your phone into fastboot mode and verify that the phone is recognized from your computer
4. In Terminal (Linux) or Powershell (Windows): Run the appropriate script
5. Start the system once. This need a few more time than the first installation cause the data partition remains. Be patient.
6. Install the Magisk Manager App
7. Be happy with a rooted GrapheneOS
Sources:
https://github.com/GrapheneOS
https://grapheneos.org/releases
https://github.com/GrapheneOS/kernel_google_coral
https://github.com/GrapheneOS/device_google_coral-kernel
All Credits go to:
- The GrapheneOS team
- wolfu11 for reporting the verizon bug and testing the windows scripts
- and topjohnwu for his amazing Magisk
Created: 09.08.2020
Based on: Android 10
Updated: 21.08.2020
Current Version: 2020.08.07.01
Changelog from 09.08.2020
New Release: 2020.08.03.22
SHA3-512 Hash for Complete zip:
Code:
773c67b8571927c6f884a98ee67a10f96c3a759e34f925f7a8aaab7c19a4ca6b1ff53bb6dc500b4fe7c306b73853189a1c559889df6d9b4f2e8a90258d3d26c9
SHA3-512 Hash for Unpatched boot.img:
Code:
9b584f6941d37f60a7ed17ec4108b7bf484c3cbf1b63f2be6af1e59f452ed1d06e1b64704785d6ca3b38a3c09c8f29657f88c757bda993df509ef001d9842f00
Changes:
full 2020-08-01 security patch level
full 2020-08-05 security patch level
rebased onto QQ3A.200805.001 release
fix secondary stack hardening when a non-page-size multiple stack size is specified
fix picking up previous build date when doing incremental builds
Vanadium: update Chromium base to 84.0.4147.89
Vanadium: update Chromium base to 84.0.4147.105
Vanadium: update Chromium base to 84.0.4147.111
Vanadium: remove Chromium logo in chrome://version
kernel (Pixel 4, Pixel 4 XL): read-only data expansion
Changelog from 11.08.2020:
Updated the OP with some more informations
Rewrite the instruction cause i believe that they were not fully correct.
Reupload the 2020.08.03.22 unofficial release with new structure. I patched the boot.img which come with GrapheneOS in the zip with Magisk and then replaced the original GrapheneOS boot.img in the zip with the patched version.
Hi good evening to all,
Can somebody try to install this Rom with the updated instructions? I think they should work now (at least on Linux) but i would appreciate a confirmation to be safe.
dhacke said:
Changelog from 11.08.2020:
Updated the OP with some more informations
Rewrite the instruction cause i believe that they were not fully correct.
Reupload the 2020.08.03.22 unofficial release with new structure. It isn't needed anymore to flash Magisk separately from the zip. I replaced the stock boot.img in the zip with the pre-patched one.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just a heads up - you really aren't meant to pre-patch a boot image for Coral/Flame, as you are only meant to patch the boot image from your own individual device, as per the man topjohnwu himself
See: https://twitter.com/topjohnwu/status/1272136975022084097?s=19
Can you supply the unpatched boot img?
Thank you
wolfu11 said:
Can you supply the unpatched boot img?
Thank you
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Done. Look here: (Mod Edit: Link removed)
I added an SHA3-512 Hash for file checking,too (see changelog from 11.08.2020).
Changelog from 15.08.2020
New Release: 2020.08.07.01
SHA3-512 Hash for Complete zip:
Code:
f3a2b088e0ec503296d5a2527a3766951cb2a3ccd1955ced14d304222e76ed3f341dd9d84b6e186a534eddac335065b756c1fdc89d0f1db3985314424e7f9eea
SHA3-512 Hash for unpatched boot image:
Code:
11abb901511ce8e39911bc951be4b1a349158c5d8389e74766942159c0f83aa9730ed39d8c8ae6c3cc66be559e3c165b5d4f35e0962d20a7be0b1532673a0287
Changes:
SELinux policy: fix executing apk libraries as executables for third party applications
Installation Notices:
From 2020.08.03.22 => No wipe needed. Just take the update scripts and let the right one running (see OP).
From Stock Rom => Use the install_first scripts. Be aware: This will wipe your data
Apart from that i recommend to make a backup first always (to be safe).
Wireguard Kernel integration
dhacke said:
Hi good evening to all,
Can somebody try to install this Rom with the updated instructions? I think they should work now (at least on Linux) but i would appreciate a confirmation to be safe.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi, great work!! It was exactly what I was looking for, GrapheneOS with root. Are you able to integrate wireguard into the kernel?
[email protected] said:
Hi, great work!! It was exactly what I was looking for, GrapheneOS with root. Are you able to integrate wireguard into the kernel?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi Cryptt33,
first thx for your praise.
Regarding wireguard integration:
You should be able to use Wireguard independently from the kernel if i understand the description from the wireguard f-droid app right (https://f-droid.org/en/packages/com.wireguard.android/).
Then Wireguard runs in a userspace version. Apart from that i have found a xda thread already regarding wireguard integration. I guess i will at least try it and mayby i will be successful with the help of the thread. But i can't give a eta. I built roms from sources in the past but i until now i didn't try to modify them before the compiling step.
Best regards
dhacke
dhacke said:
Hi Cryptt33,
first thx for your praise.
Regarding wireguard integration:
You should be able to use Wireguard independently from the kernel if i understand the description from the wireguard f-droid app right (https://f-droid.org/en/packages/com.wireguard.android/).
Then Wireguard runs in a userspace version. Apart from that i have found a xda thread already regarding wireguard integration. I guess i will at least try it and mayby i will be successful with the help of the thread. But i can't give a eta. I built roms from sources in the past but i until now i didn't try to modify them before the compiling step.
Best regards
dhacke
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just need to add this to local_manifest for WG support
If unfamiliar with local_manifest, it's located in /.repo/local_manifests/ - it'll be the only file in that dir, often it's called room service.xml but it could be something like graphene_manifest.xml. Either way, it'll be the only file there and it'll be an XML - add those lines above to it and sync and you should have WireGuard support.
<remote name="zx2c4" fetch=https://git.zx2c4.com/>
<project remote="zx2c4" name="android_kernel_wireguard" path="kernel/wireguard" revision="master" sync-s="true" />
dhacke said:
Hi good evening to all,
Can somebody try to install this Rom with the updated instructions? I think they should work now (at least on Linux) but i would appreciate a confirmation to be safe.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've tried this several time with a windows computer with no luck the shell opens briefly with red writing on the top and closes.
i must be doing something wrong but can't put my finger on it..... i run windows ltsb but i don't have any issues up and downgrading my p4 xl on it i am running the latest platform tools but get this message:
C:\Users\Wolf's laptop\Desktop\platform-tools_r30.0.4-windows\platform-tools>flash-all_first_install
fastboot : The term 'fastboot' is not recognized as the name of a cmdlet, function, script file, or operable program.
Check the spelling of the name, or if a path was included, verify that the path is correct and try again.
At line:1 char:10
+ $version=fastboot --version; try { $verNum = $version[0].substring(17 ...
+ ~~~~~~~~
+ CategoryInfo : ObjectNotFound: (fastboot:String) [], CommandNotFoundException
+ FullyQualifiedErrorId : CommandNotFoundException
fastboot too old; please download the latest version at https............
wolfu11 said:
I've tried this several time with a windows computer with no luck the shell opens briefly with red writing on the top and closes.
i must be doing something wrong but can't put my finger on it..... i run windows ltsb but i don't have any issues up and downgrading my p4 xl on it i am running the latest platform tools but get this message:
C:\Users\Wolf's laptop\Desktop\platform-tools_r30.0.4-windows\platform-tools>flash-all_first_install
fastboot : The term 'fastboot' is not recognized as the name of a cmdlet, function, script file, or operable program.
Check the spelling of the name, or if a path was included, verify that the path is correct and try again.
At line:1 char:10
+ $version=fastboot --version; try { $verNum = $version[0].substring(17 ...
+ ~~~~~~~~
+ CategoryInfo : ObjectNotFound: (fastboot:String) [], CommandNotFoundException
+ FullyQualifiedErrorId : CommandNotFoundException
fastboot too old; please download the latest version at https............
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi wolfu11,
i know this message in similar way on Linux. To fix it on linux i need to run all fastboot commands and scripts with './' before.
So for example:
./fastboot devices instead of fastboot devices or ./flash-all.sh instead of flash-all.sh.
I done this in the scripts for linux already cause i know it is needed there but didn't thought that it is needed on windows, too.
So please go into the script and make this before all fastboot commands:
./
Save it and execute it in the plattform-tools folder with ./ again in the shell. Hopefully it runs then.
If this fixes your issue, i will update the windows scripts.
dhacke said:
Hi wolfu11,
i know this message in similar way on Linux. To fix it on linux i need to run all fastboot commands and scripts with './' before.
So for example:
./fastboot devices instead of fastboot devices or ./flash-all.sh instead of flash-all.sh.
I done this in the scripts for linux already cause i know it is needed there but didn't thought that it is needed on windows, too.
So please go into the script and make this before all fastboot commands:
./
Save it and execute it in the plattform-tools folder with ./ again in the shell. Hopefully it runs then.
If this fixes your issue, i will update the windows scripts.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I will try it when I get home today thank you
wolfu11 said:
I will try it when I get home today thank you
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
that didn't work either i downloaded the latest platform tools so im at a loss about the fastboot issue.
I'm going keep trying
Update: I was able to get the official Graphene to work via putting the image into a working stock update platform tools folder and renaming it to the stock image. it wouldn't work per instruction on the website very strange.
wolfu11 said:
that didn't work either i downloaded the latest platform tools so im at a loss about the fastboot issue.
I'm going keep trying
Update: I was able to get the official Graphene to work via putting the image into a working stock update platform tools folder and renaming it to the stock image. it wouldn't work per instruction on the website very strange.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well it was worth a shot texts don't work on verizon so i guess i'll just give up.
thank you
wolfu11 said:
Well it was worth a shot texts don't work on verizon so i guess i'll just give up.
thank you
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi wolfu11,
i tested the bat script (more precisely flash-all.bat) with './' on my dedicated gaming machine with win 10 2004 education, too. First i got the same problem as you: It didn't run whether i made './' before all fastboot commands in the scripts.
Then i removed all the './' before all fastboot command except at this line:
Code:
$version= fastboot --version; ^
So the line looks now:
Code:
$version=./fastboot --version; ^
And hurray the script worked without problems on my machine (see attached screenshots).
Only as reminder: The bat scripts are from the 2020.08.07.01 unofficial release so you need the radio, bootloader and image files from that release.
i attached the new scripts with my mentioned modification, too. Xda doesn't allow bat files so i made them into a zip file. Please test once more. Thx in advance.
dhacke said:
Hi wolfu11,
i tested the bat script (more precisely flash-all.bat) with './' on my dedicated gaming machine with win 10 2004 education, too. First i got the same problem as you: It didn't run whether i made './' before all fastboot commands in the scripts.
Then i removed all the './' before all fastboot command except at this line:
Code:
$version= fastboot --version; ^
So the line looks now:
Code:
$version=./fastboot --version; ^
And hurray the script worked without problems on my machine (see attached screenshots).
Only as reminder: The bat scripts are from the 2020.08.07.01 unofficial release so you need the radio, bootloader and image files from that release.
i attached the new scripts with my mentioned modification, too. Xda doesn't allow bat files so i made them into a zip file. Please test once more. Thx in advance.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That script worked thanks
wolfu11 said:
That script worked thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah finally. I'm happy to read that. Then i will update the OP & scripts in the next days and take you on the credit section. Thx very much for your windows testing.
Now the next on the to-do list is the building of this rom from source and adding Wireguard support into the kernel
dhacke said:
Yeah finally. I'm happy to read that. Then i will update the OP & scripts in the next days and take you on the credit section. Thx very much for your windows testing.
Now the next on the to-do list is the building of this rom from source and adding Wireguard support into the kernel
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No problem i'm happy to test. unfortunately the still is an issue with texting on verizon which is what i use this phone on. the texts send but receiving them is not reliable. I tested on an att sim and it didn't have an issue so it's something on verizon's end.
I haven't seen this shared anywhere but it's really quite straightforward if you know what you're doing. Maybe it helps someone to post it here. The next section is only for completeness, feel free to skip past it to get to the gist of it.
Background
Android by design depends for full functionality on Google services. These are normally provided by a proprietary application package com.google.android.gms. MicroG is an open-source replacement for Google services, allowing the user to take advantage of working notifications, location backends, installer, and other essential services, without compromising privacy and giving Google a backdoor to your device.
To operate properly, MicroG needs the ability to pretend it is the actual Google services application package, signed by Google. Hence the need for signature spoofing.
Official LineageOS builds do not include the ability to spoof signatures. Thus, using LineageOS with MicroG takes extra steps such as building patched LineageOS locally (a resource-consuming endeavor), or taking advantage of the LineageOS for MicroG builds helpfully provided in collaboration with the MicroG team (which however, due to resource constraints, are updated less often and lag behind the official builds).
A third solution is to patch an already-built system at installation time. This was initially implemented with Needle by souramoo, forked and improved upon as Tingle by @ale5000, which eventually inspired a wholly different approach with DexPatcher by @Lanchon, a tool allowing flexible patching of Dalvik executables, in particular services.jar, where signature spoofing is commonly implemented. Relevant patches for DexPatcher were authored by Lanchon himself up to Android 9. Later on, @oF2pks picked up the work to provide patches for Android 11.
Unfortunately, no such patch to be used with DexPatcher has existed from Android 12 onwards. One other option includes installing the FakeGApps Xposed module as forked and updated by whiz-inc. While it's great it exists, and the author's work should be appreciated, it's a complication and an unnecessary burden in many scenarios to depend on Xposed (and thus Magisk and LSPosed or the like) as a prerequisite for the patch to work. It's also worth it to be aware that the implementation makes it less secure than the traditional signature spoofing method.
The DexPatcher approach has several advantages. The patch can be more flexible and continues to apply as the underlying code changes. In comparison, the simple approach presented here is much more primitive and might require readjustment as new versions emerge over time. However it might still be good to know it works.
This way you can use the latest official LineageOS with MicroG, and update at will, as soon as new builds become available.
Patching
This is not a walkthrough, and I'm not going to explain everything step-by-step. Rather, the purpose is to give you the general idea what to do, which you can then adjust to your specific use case.
Obtain the file services.jar to patch. For example:
Pull it from your device: adb pull /system/framework/services.jar – or –
Extract it from a LineageOS image: payload-dumper-go -p system payload.bin and imgextractor system.img
Extract the file with APK Tool: apktool2 d -o services services.jar
Make the changes that allow signature spoofing. Either:
Apply the patch attached to this post: patch -i services.diff -p0 – or –
As of current LOS 19.1 builds (Nov 2022), you can just replace the single file: smali_classes2/com/android/server/pm/PackageManagerService$ComputerEngine.smali with the one attached to this post.
Note: this might not always hold in the future. You might even need to apply the patch manually if the source changes too much. Either approach works for now.
Recompile the modified framework: apktool2 b -c -f -o services.jar services
Note: This will overwrite the original services.jar. The -c flag to APK Tool is important as it keeps all the original META-INF inside it intact.
Copy services.jar over to the device: adb push services.jar /system/framework/ and you probably also have to adjust the permissions accordingly
This approach should work for any Android version in principle, although the exact patch might differ. However, since better options exist for Android 11 and below, you are probably interested in applying this to Android 12 or higher only.
One More Thing
For Android 12, an extra step is critical to ensure no bootloop on subsequent boot (2nd and then on), since oat_file_manager.cc now includes a check if OAT (.odex/.vdex) files are loaded from "trusted" locations only (effectively, the /system partition). You have to generate the optimization files and place them in the correct location, which is /system/framework/oat/arm64/:
dex2oat --dex-file=/system/framework/services.jar --instruction-set=arm64 --oat-file=/system/framework/oat/arm64/services.odex
The .vdex file will be created as well (these files already exist but should be overwritten, check the timestamps or you might want to delete them beforehand just to be sure). If you skip this step, the device will boot the 1st time but then the optimization files will be generated and saved in /data/dalvik-cache/. On any subsequent boot, an attempt to load these files from an "untrusted" location by the system will throw a fatal error and the Zygote process will die with the message: "Executing untrusted code from [...]". If you somehow find yourself in this predicament, delete the following files and reboot to temporarily make it work one more time:
/data/dalvik-cache/arm64/[email protected][email protected]@classes.dex
/data/dalvik-cache/arm64/[email protected][email protected]@classes.vdex
Further Steps
These are not all the required steps to install MicroG on an official LineageOS installation. You still want to, in particular:
Install at least the main MicroG app (GmsCore) and a dummy signature spoofing APK (also attached to this post) as priv-apps
Set up the priv-app permissions accordingly – otherwise you'll get a bootloop
Likely also install FakeStore, Aurora Store/F-Droid, and location backends of your choice, etc.
However: this is a simple solution to perhaps the most cumbersome aspect of signature spoofing. It's not necessary to resort to Xposed modules to get it working on Android 12, or to depend on a special build with the spoofing patched in at compilation time.
Credit: The patch .smali code has been reverse-engineered from the spoofing patch for LineageOS for MicroG builds.
Aqq123 said:
Patching
This is not a walkthrough, and I'm not going to explain everything step-by-step. Rather, the purpose is to give you the general idea what to do, which you can then adjust to your specific use case.
Obtain the file services.jarto patch. For example:
Pull it from your device: adb pull /system/framework/services.jar – or –
Extract it from a LineageOS image: payload-dumper-go -p system payload.bin and imgextractor system.img
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
can i do this method for android 12 one ui 4.1 s10e? it says extract lineage os from system image but how do i do that in one ui?
kullanici32 said:
can i do this method for android 12 one ui 4.1 s10e? it says extract lineage os from system image but how do i do that in one ui?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't know anything about Samsung but try here:
[TUTORIAL] How to Edit Unpack & Repack Samsung system.img or system.img.ext4
Follow https://stackoverflow.com/questions/58541074/how-to-unpack-modify-pack-and-flash-system-img-ext4-file-using-odin a) Modifying With simg2img system.img.ext4 system.img, you will get a raw image file named system.img With mkdir system...
forum.xda-developers.com
Alternatively you can just take services.jar from a live (running) system.
kullanici32 said:
can i do this method for android 12 one ui 4.1 s10e? it says extract lineage os from system image but how do i do that in one ui?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There are many good custom Rom for s10e. Why do you want to start with one UI ?
kurtn said:
There are many good custom Rom for s10e. Why do you want to start with one UI ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
due to some dysfunctions and design change, I will debloat one UI 4.1 and turn off google and samsung services in the back and make it like lineage os as much as possible, but the main services I use will be samsung applications. so i have a dream
kullanici32 said:
due to some dysfunctions and design change, I will debloat one UI 4.1 and turn off google and samsung services in the back and make it like lineage os as much as possible, but the main services I use will be samsung applications. so i have a dream
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've seen people doing similar things on android 12
Signature Spoofing on unsuported Android 11 (R) Roms
How to get Signature Spoofing working on Android 11 (R) Roms that have no support for Signature Spoofing? In my Case here I use a Samsung Galaxy S8 with an unofficial LineageOS 18.1 (Android 11) by stricted I use TWRP recovery but this should...
forum.xda-developers.com
kurtn said:
I've seen people doing similar things on android 12
Signature Spoofing on unsuported Android 11 (R) Roms
How to get Signature Spoofing working on Android 11 (R) Roms that have no support for Signature Spoofing? In my Case here I use a Samsung Galaxy S8 with an unofficial LineageOS 18.1 (Android 11) by stricted I use TWRP recovery but this should...
forum.xda-developers.com
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
because once you use samsung software, you can't quit. (of course debloated) I have used my phone without root until now, only by disabling system applications. now I'm trying to remove as much samsung/google as possible from the system or whatever services are unnecessary for me, I will do just like micro g for lineage os, the only difference is by using quality applications such as gallery phone application, because lineage os is very lousy.
Aqq123 said:
As of current LOS 19.1 builds (Nov 2022), you can just replace the single file: smali_classes2/com/android/server/pm/PackageManagerService$ComputerEngine.smali with the one attached to this post.
Note: this might not always hold in the future. You might even need to apply the patch manually if the source changes too much. Either approach works for now
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How can I manually edit this file? because the attached file is 288kb and the one in samsung is 390kb.
so how do i open this file and where do i patch it?
kullanici32 said:
How can I manually edit this file? because the attached file is 288kb and the one in samsung is 390kb.
so how do i open this file and where do i patch it?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Of course. The patch is against current LOS 19.1, and this is the only situation where you can replace the whole .smali file instead of reapplying the patch. On other flavors of Android you'd have to redo the equivalent manually. In some cases it might even take a different patch altogether.
These are all text files. Just use any text editor, preferably with syntax highlighting, such as Notepad++. First look at services.diff. This is the code you want to add.
Now, in the APK you decompiled, look for where .method public final generatePackageInfo(Lcom/android/server/pm/PackageSetting;II)Landroid/content/pm/PackageInfo; is defined. The patch works by adding two private methods:
.method private static applyFakeSignature(Lcom/android/server/pm/parsing/pkg/AndroidPackage;Landroid/content/pm/PackageInfo;Ljava/util/SetLandroid/content/pm/PackageInfo;
.method private static getRequestedFakeSignature(Lcom/android/server/pm/parsing/pkg/AndroidPackageLjava/lang/String;
These can really be added anywhere but preferably within the same .smali file.
Finally, you change the code for generatePackageInfo(...) accordingly so that: (1) signature faking is added (OR-ed) to computed permissions for apps that have this permission granted, and the fake signature is returned where applicable instead of the actual one with applyFakeSignature(...).
Maybe it's easier to understand if you look at the original code, not the decompiled one: https://github.com/lineageos4microg..._patches/android_frameworks_base-S.patch#L128 This is why I linked to it in the top post.
Again, I don't know anything about Samsung One UI. The implementation might be different. So another approach would be to find a version of Samsung's services.jar patched for signature spoofing (possibly for an earlier version of Android) and decompile it to see how it's done there.
Aqq123 said:
Now, in the APK you decompiled, look for where .method public final generatePackageInfo(Lcom/android/server/pm/PackageSetting;II)Landroid/content/pm/PackageInfo; is defined.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
.method private static applyFakeSignature(Lcom/android/server/pm/parsing/pkg/AndroidPackage;Landroid/content/pm/PackageInfo;Ljava/util/SetLandroid/content/pm/PackageInfo;
.method private static getRequestedFakeSignature(Lcom/android/server/pm/parsing/pkg/AndroidPackageLjava/lang/String;
I just write this code you say?
Or should I search for the code you provided in services.diff and copy the places marked in blue and copy the entire blue one into my original compiled file?
Aqq123 said:
Finally, you change the code for generatePackageInfo(...) accordingly so that: (1) signature faking is added (OR-ed) to computed permissions for apps that have this permission granted, and the fake signature is returned where applicable instead of the actual one with applyFakeSignature(...).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I hardly understand what you mean here.
i'm a bit of a novice
EDİT:
I added the blue parts after I found the red part, now I'll compile and test (I've probably missed something, but I'll have a look)
EDİT2:
generatePackageInfo
I searched for the code you said, but there were 3-4 (there was 1 that continued as L, and I deleted the one in this picture)
and i replaced it with this
I'll compile it now, probably won't, but...
This is the first time I've been in such a complicated business.
EDİT3: (FİXED EDİT 4 I went inside the extracted folder and solved this problem now it keeps compiling)
It gives such an error, why? (apktool2 command didn't work when extracting the file, it worked when I made apktool, ignore it) but now when recompiling it gives an error as in the picture.
EDİT5:
such an error???
EDİT6:
now that this did not happen, after extracting the jar file, I packed it again without making any changes, the original 30 mb file decreased to 20 mb and transferred to the device with mtp, then I copied it with root browser, the device system ui restarted and opened, the permissions were something like rw rw rw, maybe rw rw is Then I rebooted but the phone bootlooped. that is, if I decompile the original file and repackage it without doing anything else, it breaks down. :/
Aqq123 said:
I haven't seen this shared anywhere but it's really quite straightforward if you know what you're doing. Maybe it helps someone to post it here. The next section is only for completeness, feel free to skip past it to get to the gist of it.
Background
Android by design depends for full functionality on Google services. These are normally provided by a proprietary application package com.google.android.gms. MicroG is an open-source replacement for Google services, allowing the user to take advantage of working notifications, location backends, installer, and other essential services, without compromising privacy and giving Google a backdoor to your device.
To operate properly, MicroG needs the ability to pretend it is the actual Google services application package, signed by Google. Hence the need for signature spoofing.
Official LineageOS builds do not include the ability to spoof signatures. Thus, using LineageOS with MicroG takes extra steps such as building patched LineageOS locally (a resource-consuming endeavor), or taking advantage of the LineageOS for MicroG builds helpfully provided in collaboration with the MicroG team (which however, due to resource constraints, are updated less often and lag behind the official builds).
A third solution is to patch an already-built system at installation time. This was initially implemented with Needle by souramoo, forked and improved upon as Tingle by @ale5000, which eventually inspired a wholly different approach with DexPatcher by @Lanchon, a tool allowing flexible patching of Dalvik executables, in particular services.jar, where signature spoofing is commonly implemented. Relevant patches for DexPatcher were authored by Lanchon himself up to Android 9. Later on, @oF2pks picked up the work to provide patches for Android 11.
Unfortunately, no such patch to be used with DexPatcher has existed from Android 12 onwards. One other option includes installing the FakeGApps Xposed module as forked and updated by whiz-inc. While it's great it exists, and the author's work should be appreciated, it's a complication and an unnecessary burden in many scenarios to depend on Xposed (and thus Magisk and LSPosed or the like) as a prerequisite for the patch to work. It's also worth it to be aware that the implementation makes it less secure than the traditional signature spoofing method.
The DexPatcher approach has several advantages. The patch can be more flexible and continues to apply as the underlying code changes. In comparison, the simple approach presented here is much more primitive and might require readjustment as new versions emerge over time. However it might still be good to know it works.
This way you can use the latest official LineageOS with MicroG, and update at will, as soon as new builds become available.
Patching
This is not a walkthrough, and I'm not going to explain everything step-by-step. Rather, the purpose is to give you the general idea what to do, which you can then adjust to your specific use case.
Obtain the file services.jarto patch. For example:
Pull it from your device: adb pull /system/framework/services.jar – or –
Extract it from a LineageOS image: payload-dumper-go -p system payload.bin and imgextractor system.img
Extract the file with APK Tool: apktool2 d -o services services.jar
Make the changes that allow signature spoofing. Either:
Apply the patch attached to this post: patch -i services.diff -p0 – or –
As of current LOS 19.1 builds (Nov 2022), you can just replace the single file: smali_classes2/com/android/server/pm/PackageManagerService$ComputerEngine.smali with the one attached to this post.
Note: this might not always hold in the future. You might even need to apply the patch manually if the source changes too much. Either approach works for now.
Recompile the modified framework: apktool2 b -c -f -o services.jar services
Note: This will overwrite the original services.jar. The -c flag to APK Tool is important as it keeps all the original META-INF inside it intact.
Copy services.jar over to the device: adb push services.jar /system/framework/ and you probably also have to adjust the permissions accordingly
This approach should work for any Android version in principle, although the exact patch might differ. However, since better options exist for Android 11 and below, you are probably interested in applying this to Android 12 or higher only.
One More Thing
For Android 12, an extra step is critical to ensure no bootloop on subsequent boot (2nd and then on), since oat_file_manager.cc now includes a check if OAT (.odex/.vdex) files are loaded from "trusted" locations only (effectively, the /system partition). You have to generate the optimization files and place them in the correct location, which is /system/framework/oat/arm64/:
dex2oat --dex-file=/system/framework/services.jar --instruction-set=arm64 --oat-file=/system/framework/oat/arm64/services.odex
The .vdex file will be created as well (these files already exist but should be overwritten, check the timestamps or you might want to delete them beforehand just to be sure). If you skip this step, the device will boot the 1st time but then the optimization files will be generated and saved in /data/dalvik-cache/. On any subsequent boot, an attempt to load these files from an "untrusted" location by the system will throw a fatal error and the Zygote process will die with the message: "Executing untrusted code from [...]". If you somehow find yourself in this predicament, delete the following files and reboot to temporarily make it work one more time:
/data/dalvik-cache/arm64/s[email protected][email protected]@classes.dex
/data/dalvik-cache/arm64/[email protected][email protected]@classes.vdex
Further Steps
These are not all the required steps to install MicroG on an official LineageOS installation. You still want to, in particular:
Install at least the main MicroG app (GmsCore) and a dummy signature spoofing APK (also attached to this post) as priv-apps
Set up the priv-app permissions accordingly – otherwise you'll get a bootloop
Likely also install FakeStore, Aurora Store/F-Droid, and location backends of your choice, etc.
However: this is a simple solution to perhaps the most cumbersome aspect of signature spoofing. It's not necessary to resort to Xposed modules to get it working on Android 12, or to depend on a special build with the spoofing patched in at compilation time.
Credit: The patch .smali code has been reverse-engineered from the spoofing patch for LineageOS for MicroG builds.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I followed your steps for my OnePlus 8T on Lineage 19.1 and the signature spoofing app says disabled. When recompiling the system.jar with the new file copy and pasted in classes 2 the new system.jar is smaller than the original. Perhaps there is the issue with spoofing. Any information on this matter is much appreciated. Thank you for a great post btw.
Below is the attachment recompiled, perhaps some one else maybe interested in giving it a try or to just examine and find where the error may exist or to conclude it's my own error in recompiling.
JedidroidX said:
I followed your steps for my OnePlus 8T on Lineage 19.1 and the signature spoofing app says disabled. When recompiling the system.jar with the new file copy and pasted in classes 2 the new system.jar is smaller than the original. Perhaps there is the issue with spoofing. Any information on this matter is much appreciated. Thank you for a great post btw.
Below is the attachment recompiled, perhaps some one else maybe interested in giving it a try or to just examine and find where the error may exist or to conclude it's my own error in recompiling.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Don't use signature spoofing app. The only relevant measure of success is microG self-check. Use an installer to make microG a system app.
JedidroidX said:
I followed your steps for my OnePlus 8T on Lineage 19.1 and the signature spoofing app says disabled. When recompiling the system.jar with the new file copy and pasted in classes 2 the new system.jar is smaller than the original. Perhaps there is the issue with spoofing. Any information on this matter is much appreciated. Thank you for a great post btw.
Below is the attachment recompiled, perhaps some one else maybe interested in giving it a try or to just examine and find where the error may exist or to conclude it's my own error in recompiling.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't see any attachment (seems you edited your post) but I guess you recompiled it fine. If you didn't, the device would have ended up in a bootloop (Zygote process wouldn't start), so you'd definitely know. It should be services.jar though, not * system.jar, so maybe you didn't install it properly? Smaller file size is expected, since the repackaged version uses stronger compression as a ZIP file, so nothing to worry about. Again, if there's any problem with the modified services.jar, the device wouldn't get past the boot animation.
I'm not sure what you mean exactly by "signature spoofing app says disabled." It's not an actual app: it doesn't have any code, and won't show up in Launcher. Its only purpose is to add this permission. That being said, if you go into: Settings → Apps → See all ... apps → ⋮ → Show system → Signature Spoofing, there should be a button saying Disable (meaning it's enabled now), and not Enable (which would mean it were disabled at the time). Also, if you go further from that screen into Permissions → Additional permissions → Signature spoofing it should say Allow for this app, and when you click See all apps with this permission, it should show microG Services Core there as Allowed. If you set it up well this is all done automatically with the configuration files, you shouldn't have to go through the settings to change anything via the UI.
As I wrote in the original post, additional steps are required to fully set up MicroG, which is really outside the scope of this thread. These are, for the most part, the same steps as if you were using oF2pks's patch for Android 11 with Lanchon's DexPatcher except more recently you also have to add android.permission.MANAGE_USB to com.gooogle.android.gms (that is, MicroG Services Core) privapp-permissions, or you'll end up with a bootloop for a wholly different reason.
This topic is vast, and there are multiple ways to do it. Note that these should be installed as system apps, some of them as priv-apps, so there are many things that can go wrong. If you don't grant a priv-app all the required permissions through the configuration, now (as of Android 9 I think) you'll get a bootloop. For system apps, you also have to extract libraries (if any) from APKs and place them separately on the filesystem, and make sure you get the details right for the architecture: if you don't, you get... guess what (a bootloop). It's good to have a script automating all this: I have my own flashable ZIP specific to my needs but there are other more general solutions. Or, if you want to learn how to do this manually, one way would be to compare a vanilla LineageOS image with LineageOS for MicroG for the same device around the same build date and see what they are doing extra. On Windows you can use WinMerge to compare files and entire directory structures easily. But again, this is really outside the scope of this thread, which is about patching services.jar for signature spoofing support. No matter how you implement signature spoofing, you still have to figure out those other steps separately.
kurtn said:
Don't use signature spoofing app.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Actually, with this approach, Signature Spoofing app has to be used. This is to keep the patch as lean as possible (since it's easier to install a separate app rather than keep maintaining a more complicated patch).
It's not needed with LineageOS for MicroG, where it's already incorporated into the system (lines 1-82 in the patch): https://github.com/lineageos4microg...atches/android_frameworks_base-S.patch#L1-L82
Aqq123 said:
I don't see any attachment (seems you edited your post) but I guess you recompiled it fine. If you didn't, the device would have ended up in a bootloop (Zygote process wouldn't start), so you'd definitely know. It should be services.jar though, not * system.jar, so maybe you didn't install it properly? Smaller file size is expected, since the repackaged version uses stronger compression as a ZIP file, so nothing to worry about. Again, if there's any problem with the modified services.jar, the device wouldn't get past the boot animation.
I'm not sure what you mean exactly by "signature spoofing app says disabled." It's not an actual app: it doesn't have any code, and won't show up in Launcher. Its only purpose is to add this permission. That being said, if you go into: Settings → Apps → See all ... apps → ⋮ → Show system → Signature Spoofing, there should be a button saying Disable (meaning it's enabled now), and not Enable (which would mean it were disabled at the time). Also, if you go further from that screen into Permissions → Additional permissions → Signature spoofing it should say Allow for this app, and when you click See all apps with this permission, it should show microG Services Core there as Allowed. If you set it up well this is all done automatically with the configuration files, you shouldn't have to go through the settings to change anything via the UI.
As I wrote in the original post, additional steps are required to fully set up MicroG, which is really outside the scope of this thread. These are, for the most part, the same steps as if you were using oF2pks's patch for Android 11 with Lanchon's DexPatcher except more recently you also have to add android.permission.MANAGE_USB to com.gooogle.android.gms (that is, MicroG Services Core) privapp-permissions, or you'll end up with a bootloop for a wholly different reason.
This topic is vast, and there are multiple ways to do it. Note that these should be installed as system apps, some of them as priv-apps, so there are many things that can go wrong. If you don't grant a priv-app all the required permissions through the configuration, now (as of Android 9 I think) you'll get a bootloop. For system apps, you also have to extract libraries (if any) from APKs and place them separately on the filesystem, and make sure you get the details right for the architecture: if you don't, you get... guess what (a bootloop). It's good to have a script automating all this: I have my own flashable ZIP specific to my needs but there are other more general solutions. Or, if you want to learn how to do this manually, one way would be to compare a vanilla LineageOS image with LineageOS for MicroG for the same device around the same build date and see what they are doing extra. On Windows you can use WinMerge to compare files and entire directory structures easily. But again, this is really outside the scope of this thread, which is about patching services.jar for signature spoofing support. No matter how you implement signature spoofing, you still have to figure out those other steps separately.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes sir, I meant the services.jar, silly me I was writing in a rush. Sorry about that confusion.
I will try again and post the result. I guess I will use the same services.jar, however the issue with optimization. I did reboot several times after flashing a cache optimization module for magisk after I adb the services.jar because I'm not familiar on how to do the optimization manually.
The optimization module did lead to magisk not loading the modules and only booted successfully due to magisk bootloop protector module.
Also to adjust permissions to 644 I presume is already in the recompiled services.jar? As I could not view what permission with mixplorer that it had.
Btw, the signature spoofing app is an app I downloaded from f- droid that just displays the signature spoofing status, if disabled or enabled and it says disabled. Again sorry about the confusing and thank you again for your great feedback.
Hi,
would like to try on AOSP 12 GSI, installed over stock OOS10 On Nord (avicii).
@Aqq123 Do you think i can make it ? Any suggestion before starting ?
What about if i get service.jar from a GSI AOSP with google apps ? Maybe signature spoofing is altredy implemented there ?
kidronvalley said:
Hi,
would like to try on AOSP 12 GSI, installed over stock OOS10 On Nord (avicii).
@Aqq123 Do you think i can make it ? Any suggestion before starting ?
What about if i get service.jar from a GSI AOSP with google apps ? Maybe signature spoofing is altredy implemented there ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Most gsi have signature spoofing feature.
Hi @kurtn
thanks,
heh, this AOSP 12 vanilla from PHH treble seems not, at least, microg is not detecting it, and one specific banking app is failing to work.
EDITED: I solved all installing PHH trebvle A12 "floss" that has signature spoofing up and running.
hi, @Aqq123 i applied the guide you wrote for lineage os 19.1 s10e (or so I think),
your attached:
I opened the PackageManagerService$ComputerEngine.smali file with notepad++,
.method private static applyFakeSignature(Lcom/android/server/pm/parsing/pkg/AndroidPackage;Landroid/content/pm/PackageInfo;Ljava/util/SetLandroid/content/pm/PackageInfo;
.method private static getRequestedFakeSignature(Lcom/android/server/pm/parsing/pkg/AndroidPackageLjava/lang/String;
I copied the code to where it says .end method and pasted it anywhere in my services.jar.
I deleted the next text where it says generatePackageInfo( and added the code that says applyFakeSignature( after it), and saved it and repackaged it as you said above.
I put it in the phone's memory and gave rw r r permissions in the system fremework with root explorer and restarted it. but the system went into bootloop.
I did a lineage os install from scratch after failing here.
I copied the PackageManagerService$ComputerEngine.smali file you provided,
I deleted the original PackageManagerService$ComputerEngine.sma in services.jar.
I pasted yours and repackaged it with the packaging code you wrote above (only apktool2 does not work for me, it works as apktool, does that cause the problem?) and I added the system to fremework and restarted the device once the device turned on but micro g and spoofing checker apk shows signature patch not applied .
and on the 2nd reboot, it naturally enters the bootloop as you said.
i didn't understand how to implement the following path, if i did that it wouldn't go into bootloop.
QUOTE: You have to generate the optimization files and place them in the correct location, which is /system/framework/oat/arm64/:
dex2oat --dex-file=/system/framework/services.jar --instruction-set=arm64 --oat-file=/system/framework/oat/arm64/services.odex
now i have 3 questions:
1. why did my patch to original smali fail (bootloop even on first boot)?
2. Why isn't the smali file you provided spoofing?
3. The file you gave does not bootloop the 1st time, but it does it for the 2nd time. What should I do to fully understand the above fix code?
ahmadmahmood2048 said:
hi, @Aqq123 i applied the guide you wrote for lineage os 19.1 s10e (or so I think),
your attached:
I opened the PackageManagerService$ComputerEngine.smali file with notepad++,
.method private static applyFakeSignature(Lcom/android/server/pm/parsing/pkg/AndroidPackage;Landroid/content/pm/PackageInfo;Ljava/util/SetLandroid/content/pm/PackageInfo;
.method private static getRequestedFakeSignature(Lcom/android/server/pm/parsing/pkg/AndroidPackageLjava/lang/String;
I copied the code to where it says .end method and pasted it anywhere in my services.jar.
I deleted the next text where it says generatePackageInfo( and added the code that says applyFakeSignature( after it), and saved it and repackaged it as you said above.
I put it in the phone's memory and gave rw r r permissions in the system fremework with root explorer and restarted it. but the system went into bootloop.
I did a lineage os install from scratch after failing here.
I copied the PackageManagerService$ComputerEngine.smali file you provided,
I deleted the original PackageManagerService$ComputerEngine.sma in services.jar.
I pasted yours and repackaged it with the packaging code you wrote above (only apktool2 does not work for me, it works as apktool, does that cause the problem?) and I added the system to fremework and restarted the device once the device turned on but micro g and spoofing checker apk shows signature patch not applied .
and on the 2nd reboot, it naturally enters the bootloop as you said.
i didn't understand how to implement the following path, if i did that it wouldn't go into bootloop.
QUOTE: You have to generate the optimization files and place them in the correct location, which is /system/framework/oat/arm64/:
dex2oat --dex-file=/system/framework/services.jar --instruction-set=arm64 --oat-file=/system/framework/oat/arm64/services.odex
now i have 3 questions:
1. why did my patch to original smali fail (bootloop even on first boot)?
2. Why isn't the smali file you provided spoofing?
3. The file you gave does not bootloop the 1st time, but it does it for the 2nd time. What should I do to fully understand the above fix code?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Use lineage.microg.org