Related
Hi
I have had Samsung Gear for a while and I used it a lot in the start and started using it again recently.
But I feel that the product is pretty dead (might just be me tho) but not many apps and such and way to many are paid.
Is this still the best smart watch out there (with the most features, as I like gadgets that can do a whole lot) or is there better smart watches right now?
I look for a smart watch with as many features and apps available as possible.
Thanks in advance
Enjoy the watch, they will most likely not improve it.
Our friends at samsung use us as test markets to better products. Because of this they (just about every year) put out new products, which for the most part are revolutionary (unlike apple, which change introduction is slow) changes.
The gear 1, 2 & S are perfect examples of three major releases in two years. Next up, IMO will be 'the great smartwatch'.... Why?? Because samsung has matured the product line and now has direct competition from Apple watch and Google wear. They need to push the next thing.
So, is your product a dead product? I would say yes. In a few months we'll all see the' next big thing' and it will be a dead product by mid 2016.
Welome to innovation at the speed of rapid change.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I337 using Tapatalk
Here is the issue. Android wear as an os is where the action is, if you could call it action, but wear doesn't support most of the cool extra features that make the gear series really great. The os, Tizen does, but nobody bothers to develop decent apps. So.. OS wise, dead, innovation wise above most everything else out there. Only you can decide if it is dead for you or not. If you want the features like camera heart rate, phone calling, etc and no apps, it is a decent device. Fortunately for me, I don't use many apps, so I will run it until it is dead. Lol
I recently bought the Gear S2 after using my Gear 2 Neo daily for almost a year.
I used my Neo for:
- Occasionally taking calls via Bluetooth when my hands were otherwise occupied (e.g. carrying stuff).
- Occasionally controlling the TV via IR blaster
- Tracking my sleep habits, how much I was getting and how much tossing/turning I did that night
- Timekeeping
- Notifications
For reasons I can't really fathom, the Gear S2 only does the latter 2. I can't really understand why Samsung would remove those features from their flagship smartwatch line. What's more, I REALLY can't understand why this watch is getting ABSOLUTELY RAVE reviews across the board. It's almost like people didn't know the Gear 2 Neo even existed.
I guess it has something to do with the fact that sleep tracking, IR device control, and accepting phone calls via bluetooth are things MOST watches are incapable of for various reasons, so it's not much of a drawback from a reviewer's standpoint when those features are removed. As someone coming from the Neo to the S2, I have a hard time getting past the fact that I have an older, cheaper device that is far more capable sitting in a drawer unused. :/
Don't get me wrong, though. What the S2 can do it does do very well. The screen is gorgeous. The rotating bezel is brilliant. This version of Tizen is lightning fast and very intuitive. The "always on" feature is great, and notifications are handled much better. But I can't really escape the feeling that, while the Neo was a smartwatch, the S2 is just a $300 watch that can send text messages and receive email.
Am I missing something here?
Oh, and for some reason I can't get mine to vibrate when text messages are received. Calls only.
I sold my lovely Gear 2 in readiness for the S2 thinking it would finally get better app support and a better UI on top of the camera and ability to make and receive calls.
What a disappointment, apps are worse or as bad as the prior 3 watches, no camera or calling !!!
If you get a 3g model then it will have a speaker...therefore allowing for calls over bluetooth even if you don't have a sim card for the watch. On the sport models there is no speaker though. For the other functions like ir blaster, I guess they figured people don't use it as much and they had to cut something out to include new things like a different form factor, NFC, etc. Not defending, just saying they evolved to something else. Personally, I love my original gear s which basically has everything but the new round size of the S2.
Yeah it's pretty crazy our Gear 2's are the still the most capable smartwatches on the market.
Tends to happen when you strap a phone on your wrist instead of a watch.
JazzMac251 said:
...I have a hard time getting past the fact that I have an older, cheaper device that is far more capable sitting in a drawer unused. :/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't understand. You say you have a more capable watch sitting in the drawer unused, yet you recently bought a new S2 that is less capable and you are using it. Why not return the S2, use your Neo and save $300 bucks. Just because the S2 is out now, doesn't mean that your Neo can't be used again.
I had a Moto 360 V1 and Gear Fit, I returned both of them after a while because I didn't like them for one reason or another. No point in keeping unused depreciating assets like phones and wearables IMO, it's not like a classic Bugatti or classic Rolex that you can pass on or will gain value.
As far as the S2 is concerned, I think it will outsell all other Gear watches combined easily. The general public just doesn't want the whole entire kitchen sink in their watches. This is evident by previously poor Gear sales. Sure, they will lose some previous Gear customers, but they are gaining many more. That's the way business works unfortunately, maximum unit sales for maximum profits. I will say though that the BT version of the S2 really needs a speaker and Google voice recognition.
supersoulfly said:
Tends to happen when you strap a phone on your wrist instead of a watch.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ha, you cannot stop the inevitable. That point that most of the posters in this thread are making, is that Samsung DROPPED a lot of features and that didn't go over well with a segment of Samsung smartwatch users. I was in the thread where they were saying the S2 was selling out in Korea.. Wow, I figured that was just plain sales talk or there must be users that don't care about the PAST features that were on past Galaxy Gear Watches. Gear 2 was nice, but I even went for the Gear S, I am fully independent of my Note 4 if I choose to be.. They have put the S2 out there without a speaker, and they downsized it..
People are not talking against the S2 just to be talking, that's for sure..
Back to your comment, why don't Samsung just make a PLAIN WATCH, and leave all Tizen, email, and small tech stuff that you can do on the S2 alone?
Get the S2 3g model if you want an independent experience. (why do people keep acting like this model doesn't exist and doesn't address most of the complaints prior S users have?)
As far as making a plain watch? I might consider wearing that before the monstrosities Samsung has put out before. Gear 2 and Gear S, lots of cool tech, but the only place I'd be seen wearing one is if I went to a Star Trek convention.
This thread reminds me of a book I read years back: "Crossing the Chasm." It's about the challenge technology companies have selling to different kinds of customers: technology enthusiastic early adopters vs. the pragmatic broader market. According to the author, Geoffrey Moore, the former are an important way to launch an product in a new space, but represent a very small market. The latter are a much larger market but are not going to buy a product until it reaches a level of maturity, refinement, and clarity of purpose.
I usually consider myself an early adopter, but I gotta say, I really like the S2, but I had no interest whatsoever in the Gear 2 or Gear S. But for those who like that sort of product, hopefully there will continue to be options in future.
I get that there's a lot of "can't please everyone" talk going on here, but here's why the removal of these features is kind of nuts to me:
The single driving complaint the public has with this type of wearable technology is that it's pointless. The iPad and the iPhone were brilliant because they were able to fill a niche solving problems in people's lives that they didn't know existed. People argue that the physical form-factor limitations inherent with smartwatches makes them redundant at best and extravagantly wasteful at worst. The problem is that this characterization is largely correct.
For smartwatches to break out of that mold, I think the key is for them to be as Swiss-army-knife as possible. Can't find the remote, got it. Can't answer call because its impractical (hands full, can't find phone, doing chores, etc), got it. Would like to evaluate sleep habits, got it. Need to make NFC payment, got it. Want to track your heart rate, got it. The second you start dumping features is the second you move the device even more into the realm of "$300+ dollar device to check your email". The rotating bezel is super cool, but the primary concern people have with smartwatches is that they're pointless, not that they need to be easy to use.
The point I was trying to make is that I was one of the few people for whom Samsung successfully created a product that actually DID fill a unique little niche in my life. As they're trying to expand their product base, it seems the last thing they would want to do is create a flagship device that has absolutely 0 appeal to someone that is already super into smartwatches anyway.
This is actually the first time I've ever upgraded a piece of technology to find it woefully inadequate to what I already had. As a technophile, that's a really strange concept to me. The technology in device is great - I love the hardware, the software, and the implementation. Unfortunately, this device really is a $350 way to read text messages on your wrist and that's all it is, which is why I'll be returning it ASAP.
Also, I have to say, it kinda looks feminine. I much prefer the squared off look of the Gear 2. That's just personal preference, though.
JazzMac251 said:
I get that there's a lot of "can't please everyone" talk going on here, but here's why the removal of these features is kind of nuts to me:
The single driving complaint the public has with this type of wearable technology is that it's pointless. The iPad and the iPhone were brilliant because they were able to fill a niche solving problems in people's lives that they didn't know existed. People argue that the physical form-factor limitations inherent with smartwatches makes them redundant at best and extravagantly wasteful at worst. The problem is that this characterization is largely correct.
For smartwatches to break out of that mold, I think the key is for them to be as Swiss-army-knife as possible. Can't find the remote, got it. Can't answer call because its impractical (hands full, can't find phone, doing chores, etc), got it. Would like to evaluate sleep habits, got it. Need to make NFC payment, got it. Want to track your heart rate, got it. The second you start dumping features is the second you move the device even more into the realm of "$300+ dollar device to check your email". The rotating bezel is super cool, but the primary concern people have with smartwatches is that they're pointless, not that they need to be easy to use.
The point I was trying to make is that I was one of the few people for whom Samsung successfully created a product that actually DID fill a unique little niche in my life. As they're trying to expand their product base, it seems the last thing they would want to do is create a flagship device that has absolutely 0 appeal to someone that is already super into smartwatches anyway.
This is actually the first time I've ever upgraded a piece of technology to find it woefully inadequate to what I already had. As a technophile, that's a really strange concept to me. The technology in device is great - I love the hardware, the software, and the implementation. Unfortunately, this device really is a $350 way to read text messages on your wrist and that's all it is, which is why I'll be returning it ASAP.
Also, I have to say, it kinda looks feminine. I much prefer the squared off look of the Gear 2. That's just personal preference, though.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agree with everything you wrote except for the part where you said you think the watch looks kinda feminine. ?
Sent from my SM-G925P using Tapatalk
supersoulfly said:
Get the S2 3g model if you want an independent experience. (why do people keep acting like this model doesn't exist and doesn't address most of the complaints prior S users have?)
As far as making a plain watch? I might consider wearing that before the monstrosities Samsung has put out before. Gear 2 and Gear S, lots of cool tech, but the only place I'd be seen wearing one is if I went to a Star Trek convention.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
, Gotta give the Star Wars Crack was a good one.
However, if the S2 was so much a winner, we wouldn't be having this conversation. Instead we all would be breaking or necks to get one. As you can see that is not the case. A lot of users that WOULD be breaking their necks to get on are instead turned off by the new design and features.
You can't ignore that, just read some of the comments.
Since I am a Samsung Fanboy, I will wait for the S3 and Note and see what happens!
I am a Star Wars fan, now I'm addicted to Guardians Of The Galaxy.
I'll gladly sale my gear 2 neo to anyone reading this.
IR blaster went away on phones and watch, just didn't make the cut for usability. I played with ir for the first day to show off then never used it again myself.
Camera in a watch was another one. Apple watch will sale a **** ton without these features for more money. It's not needed by enough people.
Speaker, u just bought the wrong model, but they should have put it in all models. I agree on that part.
Other problems are app issues and tizen is always gonna behind google wear, they are trying to swim upstream and I'm afraid they will never catchup in shear amount of apps.
The 3G model is not coming to all markets the UK being one.
Samsung is just a Apple sheep soon as the Apple watch fan boys like the whole making and taking calls Samsung will do the mother of U turn and the S3 gear will be out this time next year if not earlier.
My Gear 2 was great battery and did the notification basics and handy calling features but the lack of apps was a killer and here we are again the same crap this time 1000 apps at launch.
I think the Neo was a massively underrated device and I'll be keeping mine.
That said, the additional functionality versus the S2 were largely novelty items for me... it's core functions of time, notifications and step tracking were all I used on a daily basis. I can understand the frustration if you used these regularly.
The form factor (s2 is a beautiful watch in its own right) and the bezel navigation are worth the price of admission IMO.
I agree with JazzMac about the S2. I have had the original "Galaxy Gear", Gear 2, Gear S, and then picked up a Gear S2. After 2 days I returned it. Loved the round form factor and rotating bezel, but realized I wanted at least the receive & talk capability on the watch. I would wait for the 3G version. I have had the 3G version for about 3 weeks now and absolutely love it. Does almost everything I want, has great battery life, and I enjoy the freedom of leaving my phone for runs and other quick trips and still being connected.
Hi,
I finally got a gear S2 classic today and loving it so far except the lack of apps. I'm just wondering if it will ever take off or are app developers too interested in Android wear and apple watch to not want to put time into developing for the S2? Seems a shame because there is so much potential with the use of the bezel and I'd love to have apps like Shazam and some kind of LiFX smart bulb control as well but no one seems to be developing for it. Sadly I can't code to save my life else I would do it but would like to see more big name devs making apps for the S2.
Do you guys reckon it'll eventually catch up closer to android wear and the apple watch?
You have no idea how much I wish it did. I don't understand why...I had the first gear and the second. I sold them because of lack of apps, i told myself next time its android wear, then the S2 was announced and it was way better looking than anything else, and yet, we still lack support from official apps. The problem are not the devs themselves, its the major companies. Its also the fact that Apple has some many non-tech people that use their products and buy whatever they sell with their mouths wide open that the market is easier for anybody coding. If you ask me, the apple watch is a disaster, it looks old fashion, it lacks any feature that makes it envious from others, it barely is able to make it though the day, and it lags. And yet, it outsold any other MUCH better watch.
For some reason, the market just doesn't respond to Samsungs efforts in wearables. They have always had watches that were different, they had a camera, a IR blaster, a 3G/4G standalone version, a curved version, now a rotating bezel... Is it Tizen? Is it the lack of a good SDK? Or not enough to gain from spending money to code an app? All i've learned from the past years smartwatches is they are still a very primitive accessory, it just doesn't offer too much to anybody...Apple, Google, or Pebble, it simply is an extension of the smartphone and until it can do something different, I wont see any advancement. I love my S2, but I'm always an early adopter, a tech lover, and most people that wear smartwatches some at some level similar. I guess a watch is just not as exiting as a VR headset, which by the way is absolutely mindblowing and I have no doubt a lot of people will switch from who ever to Samsung until other companies start to play catch up. until them, Samsung have a HUGE head start and they better make something of it
It's a shame Samsungs watches have never had a lot of dev support. I've only owned a Sony Smart watch first gen (MN2) which while not the best looking watch, it still had a pretty good app selection though that said not as much as the S2 though it did have a app for controlling sphero (an RC ball) by tilting the watch, an app I can't get on the S2.
I've been talking to the dev who made TaskS2 and a big problem according to him is that Samsung have bad API documentation and devs have to know Java. Where as android wear uses similar coding to Android phones and I'll assume the apple watch is the same. I'm hoping it'll take off when Samsung make it iphone compatible but doubt it'll have many features except to have notifications. If samsung has any sense they'll make sure it works 100% with non samsung androids and iphones making it more appealing to different people. There is so much potential in the bezel though to create some pretty cool apps that use it but so far doesn't seem like it's going to get much dev support.
I also feel that the gear store is a let down. Doesn't feel as well polished as the Iphone app store or Google play and I reckon if Samsung would let gear S2 apps be downloaded from the play store it might receive more attention. They should also recode tizen so it's easier for devs to make apps. I hope Samsung doesn't let the S2 go under like previous Samsung watches that too had potential but Samsung didn't seem to do everything to really kick it off.
If samsung watches pick up market share then it will be more lucrative for devs. Otherwise devs will continue to focus on apple and, to a lesser extent, android wear. People just aren't seeing a need for smartwatches (because currently there really isn't one). As hardware and functionality improve this could change, but smartwatches in general are not yet really generating enough public interest to warrant more devs jumping on board. I love my Gear S2 classic, but mostly for the look and customization options, not because of the functionality or because I "need" to have it. My phone is always with me anyways, and is much easier for browsing, texting, emails, etc. As a watch though my Classic is unique
Ok, don't get me wrong, I'm not a fan, at all of any Apple device. I had Apple when they were actually Cool, the original 2G, 3G 3GS and 4. Then, its a mix of rehashes and more and more catching up. Bit damn Samsung, WHY??????
2 quick example. Gear S2. Fantastic watch, after all after like what 6 or 7 tries, they finally got an amazing device. And yet, S-Voice will recognize the command "remind me to call Fred at 2pm" but will deny you any freaking reminder. Why is it so hard for Samsung to put some finishing touches where little things count.
Also, why don't we have a darn stock sleep monitor? Why would I pay a 3rd party dev to do this, and worst part, it doesn't even integrate with S-Health.
Samsung, you need to start working of the finer things in life. The S7 edge is an other frustrating example. Such a gorgeous phone, I have one, i hated the s6 edge, but this one, its a piece of art. And im sure it will be one of the best selling phone in the past few years. But everything that makes the S7 edge special, is basically the edge right? well then look in the edge apps, and find the same dev selling like 60% of the edge panels, in the entire store, for 2$, that basically emulates functions Samsung should have already had. Edge feeds, there are 2. 2!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! If apple did this, there would probably already have at least 1000. Don't believe me? The Apple watch is a piece of garbage, and yet it has 50x more apps then the 7th edition of the Samsung watch.
Within 2 years, if they wanted, they could rule the entire planet and upsell any other oem 5 to 1. But, i feel like they don't want that, they just want to get by, just enough to stay above the rest of Android, and let apple keep selling boring phones that keep taking market share from them.
Sorry about my rant. I love you Samsung, i'm loyal, but **** has to change.
P.S. Its time for you to take carriers by the neck and IMPOSE UPDATES. There is no reason the same exact device half way around the world in Poland or something gets the new android half a year before the most important market in the world.
And what is, in your mind, the most important market in the World?
The north american one. And please don,t tell me china
Trouble is In my opinion and I'm probably wrong but Samsung is a massive company compared to apple. Not only do Samsung make phones but Tv's, washing machines, fridges, cookers, they make military equipment like satellite radar systems and they even have built the worlds largest skyscrapers just to name a few of there products. Apple on the other hand just make iphones, ipads, ipods, apple watch and a little box they call the apple tv oh and the Ipencil thing. So a smart watch from Samsung is a small percentage of there income.
That said I too wish they'd up there game with smart phones and watches sure it's one product out of loads of others but would be different parts of the company so they can easily work more on S voice. I do wish Google now was an option on the S2 much prefer that over S-voice as it's faster for one thing.
polish_pat said:
The north american one. And please don,t tell me china
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok. I wont. Somebody must have messed up the stats.. I'm sure North America buys alot more Samsungs than the rest of the world...
Let me guess... U'r from North America?
I've been wearing a Gear S3 daily for almost a year. I'm old enough to remember life before everyone carried a computer in their pocket. The Gear S3 restored a sense of freedom that I didn't realize had been lost, by allowing me to feel comfortable leaving the house without my cellphone. But I'm atypical, that's been mostly a novelty (despite the efforts of Samsung, LG and a few unknown Chinese watch makers putting full Android OS on watches) until now. Within a few months there will be millions of folks wearing phone watches.
Apple is rarely at the forefront of technology, they are excellent at the implementation of technology.. Samsung (as usual) had a lead and an opportunity to set the standard for smartwatches. But they lacked a clear strategy, the apps were never developed, and support was abysmal. Now Apple will deliver on the potential that the Gear S3 had.
Still, many folks haven't bought into the Apple ecosystem. So all is not lost yet. Samsung's best chance at this point it is to abandon Tizen and work on creating the best Android Wear watch available. It can still become a giant in this niche if applies its technology, manufacturing, and marketing expertise before yet another player overtakes them.
At least now Apple will provide all the obvious features we've been missing, and everyone else will be forced to finally check all those boxes as well.
afblangley said:
Now Apple will deliver on the potential that the Gear S3 had.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Huh? Do you have a LTE Gear? I've had a cellular equipped Gear since the original Gear S came out. What does the Apple Watch LTE do that the Gear S3 LTE can't? If anything Apple's playing catch up to Samsung/Android. An AMOLED display and wireless charging are going to change the Apple faithful's lives. We've had that for years. Samsung's app implementation may be different than Apple's and sometimes not for the better but I don't see any huge deficiencies in the Gear S3 based on Watch 3 being released. We can still use MST for payment where Apple Pay is still NFC only both on the phone and watch. Regardless I think few people will change eco-systems over a wearable.
I had a Gear 2 Neo(Tizen) and a Gear Live (Android) which was basically the same exact hardware and design.
The Gear Live was much worse in comparison. Poorer battery life, would occasionally crash and lag, gestures were a bit confusing even after a good amount of time with it.
The Gear 2 Neo never crashed and barley lagged, battery life was excellent, and the UI was extremely easy to maneuver around. Also, notifications were better.
I know both Android wear and Tizen has much improved since then, but I still prefer today's Tizen over Android Wear 2.0 as my smartwatch OS.
I would rather Samsung work on more app integration with Tizen, rather than taking the easy way out and using Android Wear.
Even on my Apple Watch S2, I barely use much of the app integration, and I have a ton of apps installed. Yes, app integration is nice to have for when you want to use it, but I wouldn't choose to get rid of Tizen because of lack of. Tizen is the best smartwatch OS, IMO.
I would also like it, if Sammsung would make a top Android Wear watch with the rotating bezel etc.
The main reason for that wish are a lot of compatibility problems with many Android phones, also with my Huawei Mediapad X2, which isn't supported yet for unknown reason, but runs without any issue on Android Wear!
Also, I like Ok Google and Maps implemented
More examples are here:
https://forum.xda-developers.com/an...d-samsung-gear-app-android-n-samsung-t3547035
The only reason I'd like Android Wear version of the Gear Sport is for apps that allow breadcrumbing of hikes, walks, and whatever else using the GPS. Neither Watch OS, Tizen, or Android Wear offer that feature natively, and Tizen is the only one to lack a 3rd party app that does that. But, devices from Garmin(either natively or some via a 3rd party app), Suunto, and Polar(I think the M600 Android wear watch has it natively with the Polar app).
Maybe the Apple watch will force the Gear Sport to offer even more software features, which is why Samsung won't tell us a release date for the device.
Had a apple watch for a year and a half...
Honestly, I used a apple watch (though it was a series 1) but I found it to be very boring after a while, you get way less level of customization as opposed to a Frontier, plus its just mostly buttons, one of the things that swayed me on getting a Frontier is the rotating bezel (stupid reason, i know) although the gear has some connectivity issues with using a iphone, in my opinion, it's just a bit more interesting than a apple watch since all three apple watches are similar in design and can sometimes get boring.
LancerEvoDrifter said:
Honestly, I used a apple watch (though it was a series 1) but I found it to be very boring after a while, you get way less level of customization as opposed to a Frontier, plus its just mostly buttons, one of the things that swayed me on getting a Frontier is the rotating bezel (stupid reason, i know) although the gear has some connectivity issues with using a iphone, in my opinion, it's just a bit more interesting than a apple watch since all three apple watches are similar in design and can sometimes get boring.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I bought gear s3 frontier because of the rotating bezel! :highfive:
Two things:
Android Wear is crap. It hasn't grown up and doesn't know what it wants to be once it grows up.
Apple. Nothing else need be said. I'd go without a smarthwatch before I'd put anything Apple on my wrist.
dkb218 said:
Two things:
Android Wear is crap. It hasn't grown up and doesn't know what it wants to be once it grows up.
Apple. Nothing else need be said. I'd go without a smarthwatch before I'd put anything Apple on my wrist.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yes and yes. AW is way too heavy to be used with watch specs. you don't get the advantages of having a full OS on the watch, just the disadvantages.
apple watch looks like a tiny tube television strapped to the arm. i'm sure it works great but you look like a dum dum wearing it.
As it stands your head line is fake news. Apple watch changes nothing. Even the fit bit is outselling it!
afblangley said:
I've been wearing a Gear S3 daily for almost a year. I'm old enough to remember life before everyone carried a computer in their pocket. The Gear S3 restored a sense of freedom that I didn't realize had been lost, by allowing me to feel comfortable leaving the house without my cellphone. But I'm atypical, that's been mostly a novelty (despite the efforts of Samsung, LG and a few unknown Chinese watch makers putting full Android OS on watches) until now. Within a few months there will be millions of folks wearing phone watches.
Apple is rarely at the forefront of technology, they are excellent at the implementation of technology.. Samsung (as usual) had a lead and an opportunity to set the standard for smartwatches. But they lacked a clear strategy, the apps were never developed, and support was abysmal. Now Apple will deliver on the potential that the Gear S3 had.
Still, many folks haven't bought into the Apple ecosystem. So all is not lost yet. Samsung's best chance at this point it is to abandon Tizen and work on creating the best Android Wear watch available. It can still become a giant in this niche if applies its technology, manufacturing, and marketing expertise before yet another player overtakes them.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
lol, kidding me bro? Tizen is the best OS for smartwatch
supac said:
lol, kidding me bro? Tizen is the best OS for smartwatch
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah I tried Android Wear for a good while and when I picked up my gear S3, that's when the game changed.
I love my watch. Don't spoil it with aw
I stopped at "Apple is rarely at the forefront of technology"
If you like Apple.. get the watch. If you like Gear get it. Or get both. There not the same
Zeblade said:
I stopped at "Apple is rarely at the forefront of technology"
If you like Apple.. get the watch. If you like Gear get it. Or get both. There not the same
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You mean if you have an iPhone get the iwatch.
As far as that statement, this is one of those trying to sound deep but not anything at all statements.
Apple does innovate or at least buys companies innovations. The credit is lost when they push things that have already existed as if they created. The thing is though that history doesn't often remember as much who invented something on a mobile device as much as they remember who perfected it and it's often where apple gets credit.
I mean hell Android would look like the palm treo if Google hadn't went back to the drawing board after the first apple iphone announcement.
I feel users need to stop thinking every thing needs to be the same to compete, I was so concerned about the lack of app support on tizen when I picked the 360 2nd gen over the gear S2.
Now that I have the gear S3 since release, I can say appreciate what a device is designed to do and everything the gear S3 does, it does well.
You CANNOT wear an Apple watch without owning an iPhone... this is a FACT. However, you can buy a Gear S3 without owning WHATEVER smart phone. An example was clear from a family member that wanted to give a birthday present to his 12yr old, she didn{t have a phone yet because her mom did not want her to have one, so the watch seemed like a great fit to be able to take calls, make calls and get text messages all on her wrist. Well that was the idea BUT all out the window since Apple REQUIRES you to have an iPhone to setup, an NO, setting up the watch with Mom's Phone or Dad's did not work because if a call comes in for them, she will get it on her watch as well.
Can safari run on apple watch? I know not everyone want a browser on such small screen, but the real reason im purchase gear s3 because of this! in fact im sending this post on my gear s3!
Here's what the Apple Watch has. Better health and fitness tracking. It has all the latest features that u can expect from a smartwatch. It is the smartest of all smartwatches. It can sense when ur working out, gives u daily goals, alerts u when ...
Ankusha5674 said:
Here's what the Apple Watch has. Better health and fitness tracking. It has all the latest features that u can expect from a smartwatch. It is the smartest of all smartwatches. It can sense when ur working out, gives u daily goals, alerts u when ...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Shame I'll never own an iPhone to experience it.
Ankusha5674 said:
Here's what the Apple Watch has. Better health and fitness tracking. It has all the latest features that u can expect from a smartwatch. It is the smartest of all smartwatches. It can sense when ur working out, gives u daily goals, alerts u when ...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
With all these features, no wonder it needs to be charged everyday. I can use my s3 almost 4 days on a single charge.