Related
Hi there, despite this topic I'll like to know users experiences with kernel on the Nexus5 since I'm looking for one based on battery duration. See I tested n3oHammer, franco and ElementalX from this three the best was n3oHammer but in recent Cyanogenmod updates it stop working so I'll need to change since Cyanogenmod kernel drain battery to fast, any advice? Any configuration on any kernel to get this battery duration?
PS: Sorry for ask this since it's prohibited but I need some advice on this topic
Try them and find out. Then let us know
jd1639 said:
Try them and find out. Then let us know
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well I left my experience and I'm asking for others experiences
reynierpm said:
Hi there, despite this topic I'll like to know users experiences with kernel on the Nexus5 since I'm looking for one based on battery duration. See I tested n3oHammer, franco and ElementalX from this three the best was n3oHammer but in recent Cyanogenmod updates it stop working so I'll need to change since Cyanogenmod kernel drain battery to fast, any advice? Any configuration on any kernel to get this battery duration?
PS: Sorry for ask this since it's prohibited but I need some advice on this topic
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I recommend a move away from CM.
jd1639 said:
Try them and find out. Then let us know
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's exactly what i did , each phone is used in many different ways.
Inb4lock
Sent from my Nexus 5
I personally run Franco, but no CM
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
reynierpm said:
Hi there, despite this topic I'll like to know users experiences with kernel on the Nexus5 since I'm looking for one based on battery duration. See I tested n3oHammer, franco and ElementalX from this three the best was n3oHammer but in recent Cyanogenmod updates it stop working so I'll need to change since Cyanogenmod kernel drain battery to fast, any advice? Any configuration on any kernel to get this battery duration?
PS: Sorry for ask this since it's prohibited but I need some advice on this topic
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
In my personal opinion I would run Chaos Kernel: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2551441
Comes with NXT app to tweak it. You could easily change the clock, voltage, governor, and other things in combination with screen brightness, Gravity Box's smart radio and a few other things to achieve maximum battery life. I am not a fan of CM never was never will be.
I personally could care less about battery life as long as I get through the day doing what I need to do when I need to do it. I don't do all the little things to prolong battery life. If I made it through the day and had 50% left well I would have to charge it because the next day it would die and who knows if I would use it more or less.
reynierpm said:
Hi there, despite this topic I'll like to know users experiences with kernel on the Nexus5 since I'm looking for one based on battery duration. See I tested n3oHammer, franco and ElementalX from this three the best was n3oHammer but in recent Cyanogenmod updates it stop working so I'll need to change since Cyanogenmod kernel drain battery to fast, any advice? Any configuration on any kernel to get this battery duration?
PS: Sorry for ask this since it's prohibited but I need some advice on this topic
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So you admit that you know these threads aren't allowed yet you post it anyways? That's going to go over well.
OP, as you know these threads are prohibited and will be closed. Best advice I can give you is try a few out and see which best suits your needs. Battery life depends greatly on which apps you run and your overall usage, both of which vary per user.
Thread closed
Hey there,
i like a lot slide2wake and slide2lock, i really think it is a breakthrough feature!:victory:
The only way i can enable this feature is through Touch Control.
I've tried different kernels, but only Franco's r32 has been working with Touch Control.
When i enable the mod, the battery drains in half a day,
withouth the mod can last a day and a half. :crying:
Is there any kernel who work this mod without the huge drain?
Or is there another configuration different from Touch Control which works better?
I'm on paranoid android beta 4 custom ROM.
Thanks!
charlieBin said:
Hey there,
i like a lot slide2wake and slide2lock, i really think it is a breakthrough feature!:victory:
The only way i can enable this feature is through Touch Control.
I've tried different kernels, but only Franco's r32 has been working with Touch Control.
When i enable the mod, the battery drains in half a day,
withouth the mod can last a day and a half. :crying:
Is there any kernel who work this mod without the huge drain?
Or is there another configuration different from Touch Control which works better?
I'm on paranoid android beta 4 custom ROM.
Thanks!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Many kernels have slide2wake etc. TouchControl is a kernel module but kernels that advertise this feature should not need the module.
You'll have to test them all for yourself. Obviously the digitiser has to be powered to accept touch input when teh screen is off so there will always be SOME drain.
charlieBin said:
Hey there,
i like a lot slide2wake and slide2lock, i really think it is a breakthrough feature!:victory:
The only way i can enable this feature is through Touch Control.
I've tried different kernels, but only Franco's r32 has been working with Touch Control.
When i enable the mod, the battery drains in half a day,
withouth the mod can last a day and a half. :crying:
Is there any kernel who work this mod without the huge drain?
Or is there another configuration different from Touch Control which works better?
I'm on paranoid android beta 4 custom ROM.
Thanks!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Day and a half of battery is long for me.
I suggest downloading a kernel and tweaking the CPU clock and voltage to achieve more battery life. Chaos kernel comes to mind but I am biased because that is what I run.http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2551441
rootSU said:
Many kernels have slide2wake etc. TouchControl is a kernel module but kernels that advertise this feature should not need the module.
You'll have to test them all for yourself. Obviously the digitiser has to be powered to accept touch input when teh screen is off so there will always be SOME drain.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Some drain is acceptable, driking battery not.
The kernel mod has been implemented (if i am not wrong) to better handle what and where the phone has to be awake than a simple app, i thought it could last better than what happened to me.
Anybody experiencing a better battery lasting with this mod enabled?
Any suggestion on the best kernel to try?
Otherwise i will test them with patience and report here
charlieBin said:
Some drain is acceptable, driking battery not.
The kernel mod has been implemented (if i am not wrong) to better handle what and where the phone has to be awake than a simple app, i thought it could last better than what happened to me.
Anybody experiencing a better battery lasting with this mod enabled?
Any suggestion on the best kernel to try?
Otherwise i will test them with patience and report here
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That is not my understanding. My understanding is it is an external module for custom kernels. However if jernel already has function built in, touchcontrol not necessary. The Kernels specific apps have controls to cover it.
There is no BEST kernel. Read each thread of Kernels to see if it has the feature and test it yourself.
Although if Franco kernel has slide2wake etc built in, you should test that first WITHOUT touch control.
rootSU said:
That is not my understanding. My understanding is it is an external module for custom kernels. However if jernel already has function built in, touchcontrol not necessary. The Kernels specific apps have controls to cover it.
There is no BEST kernel. Read each thread of Kernels to see if it has the feature and test it yourself.
Although if Franco kernel has slide2wake etc built in, you should test that first WITHOUT touch control.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Will test Franco without touch control as soon as possible! Thanks pal,
i'll report what happens
charlieBin said:
Will test Franco without touch control as soon as possible! Thanks pal,
i'll report what happens
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Okkei, i've been doing my homeworks after rootSu suggestions.
I found a somehow related question about franco's kernel
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2593181
It looks like you need to use a different kernel based on franco to use slide2wake.
So i tried one of the links, the linaro kernel http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=47459608
Following the instructions i created the file for the configuration and i have enabled the mod without using the touch control app.
I'll try this kernel and mod for a couple of days to see how it goes, hoping that this will make some difference.
By the way i bought franco's app which is pretty cool to set up a better configuration for any option, audio, screen and performance,
and it also works with linaro.
What exactly do i get if i will flash custom kernel to my hammerhead ? What do they provide to make it noticeable to an user ?
m4nu4l said:
What exactly do i get if i will flash custom kernel to my hammerhead ? What do they provide to make it noticeable to an user ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Custom kernels provide improvements, tweaks and more power to the user.
Some provide patches to use certain mods... E.g. Multirom patched kernels
Others allow your phone to be overclocked and undervolted. (Both CPU & GPU)
Some just save more battery than others, some have display tweaks included allowing the user to copy Samsung's saturated screens or even lower saturation.
Remember, not all kernels are compatible with all roms.
Read on the bases of the roms and kernel compatibility!
Happy flashing and good luck!
Valdorous said:
Custom kernels provide improvements, tweaks and more power to the user.
Some provide patches to use certain mods... E.g. Multirom patched kernels
Others allow your phone to be overclocked and undervolted. (Both CPU & GPU)
Some just save more battery than others, some have display tweaks included allowing the user to copy Samsung's saturated screens or even lower saturation.
Remember, not all kernels are compatible with all roms.
Read on the bases of the roms and kernel compatibility!
Happy flashing and good luck!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for the explanation, feels like i'm not the guy who would need to overclock my nexus 5, its fast enough for me out of the box. Multi-rom sounds attracting tho.
Stock kernel works just fine
Sent from my Nexus 5 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
m4nu4l said:
Thanks for the explanation, feels like i'm not the guy who would need to overclock my nexus 5, its fast enough for me out of the box. Multi-rom sounds attracting tho.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
One thing I forgot to mention are also the sound tweaks!
There are a LOT out there that are really good, although the App Viper4Android will always reign superior!
I do recommend you have a look at some of the kernels.
You can get 150% out of your battery with the right rom/kernel combo and probably more if you sacrifice some performance.
Just saying it's something a lot of people don't experiment with, I personally am a flash-aholic and need to flash new kernels and roms every other day!
Valdorous said:
I do recommend you have a look at some of the kernels.
You can get 150% out of your battery with the right rom/kernel combo and probably more if you sacrifice some performance.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
not true.
battery life is dependant on how you personally use your phone, how you set it up, what apps you use, and the quality of your phone/data connection. everything else, including kernels, play a very minor role in battery.
simms22 said:
not true.
battery life is dependant on how you personally use your phone, how you set it up, what apps you use, and the quality of your phone/data connection. everything else, including kernels, play a very minor role in battery.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not necessarily, depending on the govenor (that comes with the kernel) your phone can idle better and some kernels have adjustments to the LMK (LowMemoryKiller) which handles background apps differently.
So in my opinion with the same usage and different handling of background apps, including undervolting and a battery saving governor.
You could easily hit 150% of the usual battery life,
Kernels play in that matter a HUGE role.
You could even throw in some display tweaks (in the battery's favour).
Valdorous said:
Not necessarily, depending on the govenor (that comes with the kernel) your phone can idle better and some kernels have adjustments to the LMK (LowMemoryKiller) which handles background apps differently.
So in my opinion with the same usage and different handling of background apps, including undervolting and a battery saving governor.
You could easily hit 150% of the usual battery life,
Kernels play in that matter a HUGE role.
You could even throw in some display tweaks (in the battery's favour).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
first off, your "battery saving" govornor doesnt exist. it would depend on exactly what you are doing with the phone. the governor doesnt save battery, it tells your cpu how to behave with the incoming need. and they dont control how your phone idle. i use ondemand, and i doubt many phones idle better than mine.
undervolting DOES NOT save you battery, it can even use more than if not undervolted. the only benefit you will get from undervolting is a little less heat.
and again, kernels do not play a role in battery. if they did, every single person would be using the same battery saving kernel. but we are not. with every single kernel someone will have great battery, and someome will have terrible battery. that's because how ypu use it and your quality phone/data connection pre-decides what your battery will be like.
what you are believing are rumors. stuff people dont really know much about, but still keep repeating the non truth over and over. in reality, kernels have almost no influence in battery.
and btw, everything you can control with a custom kernel, you can with the stock kernel. and people get just as great battery on stock than on a custom kernel.
and yes, i do know what im talking about, ive been part of trinity kernel for 5 years now. and ive helped thousands with android and android related issues, including battery.
simms22 said:
first off, your "battery saving" govornor doesnt exist. it would depend on exactly what you are doing with the phone. the governor doesnt save battery, it tells your cpu how to behave with the incoming need. and they dont control how your phone idle. i use ondemand, and i doubt many phones idle better than mine.
undervolting DOES NOT save you battery, it can even use more than if not undervolted. the only benefit you will get from undervolting is a little less heat.
and again, kernels do not play a role in battery. if they did, every single person would be using the same battery saving kernel. but we are not. with every single kernel someone will have great battery, and someome will have terrible battery. that's because how ypu use it and your quality phone/data connection pre-decides what your battery will be like.
what you are believing are rumors. stuff people dont really know much about, but still keep repeating the non truth over and over. in reality, kernels have almost no influence in battery.
and btw, everything you can control with a custom kernel, you can with the stock kernel. and people get just as great battery on stock than on a custom kernel.
and yes, i do know what im talking about, ive been part of trinity kernel for 5 years now. and ive helped thousands with android and android related issues, including battery.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I know and have used your kernel.
If you noticed I said "In my opinion". No reason to get aggressive.
I have noticed something else.
And thought it worth sharing.
If I've offended you, I apologize.
Valdorous said:
I know and have used your kernel.
If you noticed I said "In my opinion". No reason to get aggressive.
I have noticed something else.
And thought it worth sharing.
If I've offended you, I apologize.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
oh gosh, please dont apologize. i also meant no offence to you.
its not you i am aggressive with btw, its that false info that just wont die. i had still many people do, but its not as bad as before. you dont need to wipe anything when flashing kernels. but, many people used to insist that its a must. i spent a lot of time fighting that falsehood, now i dont see it as much. its the same about battery. if there was a "magic" pill, everyone would be using it. but just as many people using any random kernel will get great battery life on a "battery" saving kernel, and just as many people will get bad battery life as well.
please, again, i didnt mean offence. im just trying to pass the truth around, thats all. its just that this kind of thing isnt an opinion, there is a truth and a false here. id never go against any persons opinion if it was just about opinion.
Yeah....at best....just changing from one kernel to another MAY affect your battery about 5 to 10 percent one way or the other. In other words.....the direct affect on battery is minimal.
The biggest myth in the threads are that rom/kernel combos make big differences in battery life.
Simply put, they don't.
And everything @simms22 said. ?
---------- Post added at 07:59 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:57 PM ----------
And in modern devices anyway....undervolting does nothing but keep heat down a bit.....and under clocking has an extremely minor affect as well.
Don't believe, try it and see. ?
I get the same battery life on any ROM....any kernel.
You can make your own ultra powersaving mode or your own hyper performance mode...
I'm just using custom kernel for gamma control, s2w/s2s (which is very useful for me when reading some articles on Chrome), also for USB OTG mounting. Oh oh, and also for killing time, you know messing up with frequency and stuff lol
Well, personally I never believe about the effect on battery life by using this or that kernel since there are lots of things that can affect your battery life, and for my case data connection is the battery killer :angel:
What are you guys talking about??. No, I'm not a kernel dev BUT I have tried so many ROM's and kernels on different devices for a long time now and by experience I can say that they DO influence battery life. I have seen %~50 increase (compared to stock) and aso have experienced just 4 hours of battery because a buggy kernel patch.
They're not placebo when your device start to last 19 hours instead of just 13 like it did since you bought It.
lovetatfitties said:
What are you guys talking about??. No, I'm not a kernel dev BUT I have tried so many ROM's and kernels on different devices for a long time now and by experience I can say that they DO influence battery life. I have seen %~50 increase (compared to stock) and aso have experienced just 4 hours of battery because a buggy kernel patch.
They're not placebo when your device start to last 19 hours instead of just 13 like it did since you bought It.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
your cpu is set up differently with the custom kernel. thats why. its not the kernel itself. you can set up your cpu on stock so itll be like the custom kernel. its very easy if you are familiar with a few scripts and the root filesystems. for example, i run trinity kernel. with the way trinity kernel sets up my cpu, i get better than stock kernel in battery. trinity set my cpu to run all four cores always on, no hotplugging. it also disables mpdecision. i can set up the stock kernel that way as well. i can do it using a root file explorer, manually, or i can do it via script. and i do know people that run the stock kernel that just get fabulous battery life.
---------- Post added at 10:21 PM ---------- Previous post was at 09:55 PM ----------
there are things that you can do with kernel control apps as well.
Sometimes when you flash a kernel...and many times we flash a ROM right before.....you are only getting rid of a battery issue you previously had before you flashed. So with the clean start, of course you're battery will be much better (especially if you had an unfixed or unnoticed issue before)....and sorry to put it this way, but don't know how else to put it....but the less knowledgeable people think its the new kernel that's made such a huge. Pretty much all the most experienced people know kernels don't make a very big difference to battery life. You can flash clean stock with stock kernel and see a huge gain too if you had an issue before.
Test it yourselves. Flash your favorite ROM and some kernel one day. Go a few battery cycles without changing much or installing much. Then flash the same ROM and another kernel. Same changes and same few apps. And so on...
Eventually you'll get the point.
KJ said:
Sometimes when you flash a kernel...and many times we flash a ROM right before.....you are only getting rid of a battery issue you previously had before you flashed. So with the clean start, of course you're battery will be much better (especially if you had an unfixed or unnoticed issue before)....and sorry to put it this way, but don't know how else to put it....but the less knowledgeable people think its the new kernel that's made such a huge. Pretty much all the most experienced people know kernels don't make a very big difference to battery life. You can flash clean stock with stock kernel and see a huge gain too if you had an issue before.
Test it yourselves. Flash your favorite ROM and some kernel one day. Go a few battery cycles without changing much or installing much. Then flash the same ROM and another kernel. Same changes and same few apps. And so on...
Eventually you'll get the point.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That right!
It's all about how you feel about your devices.
simms22 said:
your cpu is set up differently with the custom kernel. thats why. its not the kernel itself. you can set up your cpu on stock so itll be like the custom kernel. its very easy if you are familiar with a few scripts and the root filesystems. for example, i run trinity kernel. with the way trinity kernel sets up my cpu, i get better than stock kernel in battery. trinity set my cpu to run all four cores always on, no hotplugging. it also disables mpdecision. i can set up the stock kernel that way as well. i can do it using a root file explorer, manually, or i can do it via script. and i do know people that run the stock kernel that just get fabulous battery life.
---------- Post added at 10:21 PM ---------- Previous post was at 09:55 PM ----------
there are things that you can do with kernel control apps as well.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok man whatever, I don't like to argue about the color of the sky so.. Yeah..
Also, I think you should e-mail all the kernel devs and tell them that they're full of bs and that they all are wasting their time improving nothing. You should try to reach Linus Torvalds and tell him that he has to stop developing worthless software, that we all can mod our systems the way we want'em to behave and that we don't need support for newer technology. :good:
lovetatfitties said:
Ok man whatever, I don't like to argue about the color of the sky so.. Yeah..
Also, I think you should e-mail all the kernel devs and tell them that they're full of bs and that they all are wasting their time improving nothing. You should try to reach Linus Torvalds and tell him that he has to stop developing worthless software, that we all can mod our systems the way we want'em to behave and that we don't need support for newer technology. :good:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's a good job YOU know what you're talking about, otherwise this thread would have been worthless
The point is you can do some customizations with custom kernels. Gamma control, usb fast charge, etc etc.
But battery life? I never see the difference even with the similar usage that I always do every single day, really, I'm living in Indonesia and the data connection is the battery killer that makes me swearing aaaaall the time lol
I have tried that kernel this kernel (except caf kernel), you name it, but still nothing different, except each of them has their own characteristics.
My own solution? I bought a powerbank, that's my magic pill when my phone is out of battery.
Please, don't think I'm bashing kernel devs out there, they do fantastic job with their creations and I hope they don't stop doing that, I myself using ElementalX, because I need the features that the dev offers to user like me.
Sorry if my English is that bad :/
lovetatfitties said:
Ok man whatever, I don't like to argue about the color of the sky so.. Yeah..
Also, I think you should e-mail all the kernel devs and tell them that they're full of bs and that they all are wasting their time improving nothing. You should try to reach Linus Torvalds and tell him that he has to stop developing worthless software, that we all can mod our systems the way we want'em to behave and that we don't need support for newer technology. :good:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
Q&A for [KERNEL] [Bacon] [CM11s/CM11] Boeffla-Kernel 2.0 beta (22-10-2014)
Some developers prefer that questions remain separate from their main development thread to help keep things organized. Placing your question within this thread will increase its chances of being answered by a member of the community or by the developer.
Before posting, please use the forum search and read through the discussion thread for [KERNEL] [Bacon] [CM11s/CM11] Boeffla-Kernel 2.0 beta (22-10-2014). If you can't find an answer, post it here, being sure to give as much information as possible (firmware version, steps to reproduce, logcat if available) so that you can get help.
Thanks for understanding and for helping to keep XDA neat and tidy!
current
Lord Boeffla, after connecting the phone to charge the app shows the current charge value that are constantly changing and never reach the limits set in the settings. Is it correct?
Hi,
yes, depending on current battery level this is about correct.
The charging follows a "curve", so depending on fill level the charge rate changes. It goes up in the beginning and when it reaches high values 80-100, the current goes down again more and more.
This is to ensure healthy and smooth loading for the battery.
Only for some times somewhere in the middle, the configured charge rate is about to be used.
And also only if your charger can provide this charge rate in a stable way.
This is why the charge rate always slightly changes as the charger logic is constantly checking all conditions during the process.
So far my observations (was the same on Galaxy S3 etc...)
Andi
Thanks for the explanation. But I thought that in S3 current has been always a constant throughout the entire charging process. At least, BoefflaConfig showed that way. And phone is charging really fast via the USB port. I Liked Boeffla for it.
zin-renat said:
Thanks for the explanation. But I thought that in S3 current has been always a constant throughout the entire charging process. At least, BoefflaConfig showed that way. And phone is charging really fast via the USB port. I Liked Boeffla for it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hehe, no.
When you have a close look even on the S3, when it reaches towards 95% battery fill level, the charge rate drops. At least I was seeing that.
But the curves of S3 are different to the OPO. With the OPO it reduces much more early.
Andi
Lord Boeffla said:
Hehe, no.
When you have a close look even on the S3, when it reaches towards 95% battery fill level, the charge rate drops. At least I was seeing that.
But the curves of S3 are different to the OPO. With the OPO it reduces much more early.
Andi
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok, I'm understand. And also small question: inactive red switches in BoefflaConfig means that these functions have been not yet implemented? In Boeffla Sound screen for example.
zin-renat said:
Ok, I'm understand. And also small question: inactive red switches in BoefflaConfig means that these functions have been not yet implemented? In Boeffla Sound screen for example.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, this is correct. In cm11s, deactivated switches are having red lines around (due to the hexo design).
Many switches, especially in Boeffla-Sound will unfortunately never be non-red, as many features cannot be implemented due to the different audio chip.
But yes, you are right: If something is deactivated in the app, it means the kernel does not have this specific functionality implemented.
Andi
Lord Boeffla said:
Yes, this is correct. In cm11s, deactivated switches are having red lines around (due to the hexo design).
Many switches, especially in Boeffla-Sound will unfortunately never be non-red, as many features cannot be implemented due to the different audio chip.
But yes, you are right: If something is deactivated in the app, it means the kernel does not have this specific functionality implemented.
Andi
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you for answers and sorry for stupid questions!) You are the best kernel developer! I very glad you came to the 1+1.
Hi,
When I flash Boeffla Kerner or Stock CM 11S 38R kernel from Franco Kernel r28, WiFi don't turn on, he stays "Activating". Any suggestion to fix the problem?
Regards.
Yes. Read through the main thread of my kernel.
Franco kernel hacks the wifi firmware of the rom. Which breaks other kernels incl stock kernel.
Either flash the firmware over again to correct it.
Or try my firmware restore zip I provide in my main thread for exactly this reason...
Andi
Thank you so much!
Man oh man! I always knew you add good taste lord Boeffla, it's good to experience your kernel after the S3, many good memories, I remember getting as much as 24000 score on antutu when the default was 19000,and all this while saving some battery, from what I,ve experienced it's good so far. If I would ask something it would be some underclocking features and hotplug set to only one core on just one of the governors in order to save battery, it would be perfect
Does this kernel support encrypted devices (in opposite to e.g. franco kernel)?
Thanks
MoMaMeMi said:
Does this kernel support encrypted devices (in opposite to e.g. franco kernel)?
Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Never tried that, so I do not know.
I have not taken anything out with regards to encryption, still I cannot be 100% sure on it before someone tests it.
Andi
GKti22 said:
If I would ask something it would be some underclocking features and hotplug set to only one core on just one of the governors in order to save battery, it would be perfect
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Underclocking of CPU is of course in. Just lower the max CPU frequency.
GPU is now also reduced to a 27 MHz idle frequency with latest beta6.
And the hotplug stuff: Have a look at the hotplug profiles in beta6
Andi
Lord Boeffla said:
Never tried that, so I do not know.
I have not taken anything out with regards to encryption, still I cannot be 100% sure on it before someone tests it.
Andi
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I took the risk - works! Great
Danke Andi!
MoMaMeMi said:
I took the risk - works! Great
Danke Andi!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for confirming !!!
Andi
I'm running crDroid.. Will flashing cm11 version break WiFi or does anybody know how this kernel works with this ROM? I'm assuming flashing the cm11s will work?? Thanks
Damn, its good!!
we will see some good..
suaverc118 said:
I'm running crDroid.. Will flashing cm11 version break WiFi or does anybody know how this kernel works with this ROM? I'm assuming flashing the cm11s will work?? Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=56375250&postcount=555
Read that, when it works for them and I think you use the same ROM it should work for you to. BTW CM11 and CM11s are not the same so CM11s kernel is probably not working on a CM11 based ROM.
Hi,
Did anyone follow this thread to optimize CPU and battery life?
http://forum.xda-developers.com/nexus-5x/general/guide-advanced-interactive-governor-t3269557
Did you get nice results?
I want to try it on my phone. But I am a little bit lost.
Thanks.
I haven't tried above, but I can share my thoughts:
1. That thread is for Nexus+AOSP, params might not work for Mi4+MIUI.
2. If you wanna try those params on CM, I wonder what's the point. CM is already well optimized. Even with best kernel parameters, you'll never see a difference of night and day.
Is there something specific that you want to focus on for your device?
More battery life. But muy highest problem is mobile radio active bug... Any help?