Hello everyone,
Which phone will have better graphics performance??Xperia E3 has Adreno 305 with 854x480 screen and Quad Core Snapdragon CPU and Xperia T has Adreno 225 with 1280x720 screen and also dual core Qualcomm Snapdragon CPU.
AlienTechGR said:
Hello everyone,
Which phone will have better graphics performance??Xperia E3 has Adreno 305 with 854x480 screen and Quad Core Snapdragon CPU and Xperia T has Adreno 225 with 1280x720 screen and also dual core Qualcomm Snapdragon CPU.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Xperia e3 has better graphics performance.
Asphalt 8 max setting,s no lag.
Max payne max setting,s no lag
Gta vice city max setting no lag.
Related
Hello, what i'm asking about is your experience day by day in general performance between two different platforms:
1) Qualcomm-Snapdragon: MSM8255 45 nm ARMv7 1 GHz Scorpion, GPU Adreno 205 RAM, Dual-channel 333 MHz LPDDR2 (Es. Sony Xperia Mini 2011 model)
2) NovaThor: U8500 45 nm ARMv7 1 GHz Dual-core ARM Cortex-A9, GPU ARM Mali 400 (single-core), RAM LP-DDR2 (Es. Sony Xperia U)
Seeing different benchmark in youtube looks like the Snapdragon overcomes generally, but in fact i need more accurate opinion, please share!
Thanks to all!
Pesach85 said:
Hello, what i'm asking about is your experience day by day in general performance between two different platforms:
1) Qualcomm-Snapdragon: MSM8255 45 nm ARMv7 1 GHz Scorpion, GPU Adreno 205 RAM, Dual-channel 333 MHz LPDDR2 (Es. Sony Xperia Mini 2011 model)
2) NovaThor: U8500 45 nm ARMv7 1 GHz Dual-core ARM Cortex-A9, GPU ARM Mali 400 (single-core), RAM LP-DDR2 (Es. Sony Xperia U)
Seeing different benchmark in youtube looks like the Snapdragon overcomes generally, but in fact i need more accurate opinion, please share!
Thanks to all!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Is possible no one has an idea on it?
Hi all,
I've always wondered which would be faster for daily use a Quad Core 1.5 GHz Processor or a Dual Core 1.7 GHz
let's assume they're both Snapdragon 400 processors
Which would be better
Thanks all
Mystogan said:
Hi all,
I've always wondered which would be faster for daily use a Quad Core 1.5 GHz Processor or a Dual Core 1.7 GHz
let's assume they're both Snapdragon 400 processors
Which would be better
Thanks all
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
in my opinion is dualcore (when its good clocked and at best cortex a9 or a15)(Xperia sp) better than cortex a5 or a7 (moto g)
cause i tested both and i can say : i like the 2core cpu more cause most of all apps use only 2 cores and the xperia sp can bomb a xperia z with out problems and btw xperia sp or better a phone with s400 dc at 1,7ghz have adreno 320 and we know its better than adren305 (the s400 from moto g)
I was talking about Xperia ZR and SP... Lets assume they both have 1 gb ram ( even though ZR has 2 ) which would be faster
Based on AnTuTu benchmarks SP got 21950 while ZR got 20850
So does clock speed really win???
Hi all,
I want to buy a new phone and I am confused regarding the performance and graphical processing unit.
I have 4 combinations on my list. Please help me to choose one on basis of performance.
1. Qualcomm MSM8960T Snapdragon, Dual-core 1.7 GHz Krait, Adreno 320, with 1 GB of RAM [Sony Xperia SP]
2. Qualcomm MSM8930 Snapdragon 400, Dual-core 1.7 GHz Krait, Adreno 305, with 1.5 GB of RAM [Samsung Galaxy S4 Mini]
3. Qualcomm MSM8226 Snapdragon 400, Quad-core 1.2 GHz Cortex-A7, Adreno 305, With 1 GB of RAM [Motorola Moto G]
4. Qualcomm MSM8960 Snapdragon, Dual-core 1.5 GHz Krait, Adreno 225, With 2 GB of RAM [Blackberry Z10]
I want to buy a phone that can run android apps, and that's why Z10 is on this list.
I kind of like the interface of BB Z10 and I would like to buy it, but I think the processor and GPU are kind of outdated.
There is one more option. I can wait for BB Z3 to come which features Qualcomm Snapdragon 400, Dual-core 1.2 GHz Cortex-A7, Adreno 305, With 1.5 GB of RAM.
Please help me choose one on the basis of performance and light gaming.
Thank you.
moto g
I have a gut feeling that moto g is best because it is newer ,faster ,cheaper
Hello
I would like to know which phone do you guys think is best
1. GOCLEVER FONE 450Q
Ram - 1gb
cpu - Quad-Core 1.2 GHz Cortex-A7
gpu - PowerVR SGX544
screen - 4,5 inches
res - 1280x720
2.GIGABYTE GSMART MAYA M1 V2
Ram - 1gb
cpu - Quad-Core 1.2 GHz Cortex-A7
gpu - PowerVR SGX544
screen - 4,5 inches
res - 960 x 540
3.JUST5 SPACER
Ram - 1gb
cpu - Quad Core 1.3 GHz Cortex-A7
gpu - ARM Mali-400 MP2
screen - 5 inches
res - 960 x 540
is the pixel density enough with this phone?
And what is the differentce between ARM Mali-400 MP2 and ARM Mali-400 or PowerVR SGX544 and PowerVR SGX544 mp2?
Any advice is helpful
henry1344 said:
Hello
I would like to know which phone do you guys think is best
1. GOCLEVER FONE 450Q
Ram - 1gb
cpu - Quad-Core 1.2 GHz Cortex-A7
gpu - PowerVR SGX544
screen - 4,5 inches
res - 1280x720
2.GIGABYTE GSMART MAYA M1 V2
Ram - 1gb
cpu - Quad-Core 1.2 GHz Cortex-A7
gpu - PowerVR SGX544
screen - 4,5 inches
res - 960 x 540
3.JUST5 SPACER
Ram - 1gb
cpu - Quad Core 1.3 GHz Cortex-A7
gpu - ARM Mali-400 MP2
screen - 5 inches
res - 960 x 540
is the pixel density enough with this phone?
And what is the differentce between ARM Mali-400 MP2 and ARM Mali-400 or PowerVR SGX544 and PowerVR SGX544 mp2?
Any advice is helpful
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Get a moto G Such better Screen,much better GPU Wow
HD resolution is important
henry1344 said:
Hello
1. GOCLEVER FONE 450Q
Ram - 1gb
cpu - Quad-Core 1.2 GHz Cortex-A7
gpu - PowerVR SGX544
screen - 4,5 inches
res - 1280x720
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My chice for 1. GOCLEVER FONE 450Q
Trozzul said:
Get a moto G Such better Screen,much better GPU Wow
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
no way for me to get it :crying:
henry1344 said:
no way for me to get it :crying:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
where do you live? there should be a international version.
Trozzul said:
where do you live? there should be a international version.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I live in Estonia, small country, couldnt find moto g anywhere
Rank the following according to gaming performance only:
*Snapdragon 600 + Adreno 320 400 Mhz (Xiaomi Mi2S)
*MTK6592 + Mali 450-MP4 700 Mhz (Jiayu J5S)
*Exynos 5 Octa 5410 + PowerVR SGX544MP3 533 Mhz (Meizhu MX3)
I'm pretty much sure that the Adreno 320 is the best among these, but what I'd like to know is how much are the rest lagging behind?
I'm only interested in high-end gaming.
pgchelsea said:
Rank the following according to gaming performance only:
*Snapdragon 600 + Adreno 320 400 Mhz (Xiaomi Mi2S)
*MTK6592 + Mali 450-MP4 700 Mhz (Jiayu J5S)
*Exynos 5 Octa 5410 + PowerVR SGX544MP3 533 Mhz (Meizhu MX3)
I'm pretty much sure that the Adreno 320 is the best among these, but what I'd like to know is how much are the rest lagging behind?
I'm only interested in high-end gaming.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Samsungs Exynos is pretty good, little behind snapdragon, so is the powerVR, though not as great as adreno. MTK and Mali are terrible. they try to lock people in with the high numbers and "Octa" cores. its not bad cpus/gpus they just lag far behind exynos and snapdragon.