UAG vs Samsung Protective Cover - Galaxy Note 4 Accessories

I was wondering how the UAG cases and the Samsung Protective Cover compare in protecting the device. Which offers more protection from drops?
I really like how slim the Samsung Protective Cover is so I was wondering, how slim is the UAG compared to the Samsung?
Thanks

Not sure if you are talking about the Samsung flip cover or not. If you are, I would say there is about zero drop protection from it. It is really nothing more than a replacement back attached to some hardened cloth type fabric. I have the note 4 edge, the cover does not want to stay closed at all which is driving me nuts.
I find the functionality of a flip cover overrated, and will be returning it.

I have both, uag is much thicker the Samsung protective case is one I always go back to it is slim and very protective. I dropped my phone onto a concrete drive way with gravel from head height the phone landed on a corner then onto it's screen no marks anywhere on the case or the phone! I don't even use a screen protector I would say the Samsung case feels more premium on the phone and is very comfortable to hold and the buttons work perfectly! Uag is good but the Samsung is better I have the red and black case hope this helps
Sent from my SM-N910F using XDA Free mobile app

I have both cases, and even though the UAG is a great case, the Samsung wins. I carry my phone in my front pocket, so the UAG is a bit bulky. Of course the UAG is going to offer better drop protection, but the Samsung wins due to its smaller profile, as well as being more comfortable to hold.

Related

Diztronic vs i-Blason vs Cimo TPU cases

Let me start by saying the Diztronic TPU is amazing and absolutely perfect in every way, except one. The top and bottom chrome bezel are getting scratched by the sharp edges of the case. It's not from dirt and dust or just rubber marks, they're actual little scratches. I'm looking to buy one of the "S-Line" cases (on amazon because I have gift card credit). Others have mentioned that the edge is not as sharp on these and I do not mind the buttons being harder to press. Are the i-Blason and Cimo brands essentially the same or what? The i-Blason looks a little more refined and is rated better. Thanks!
edit: forgot, I have an Ionic guardian and it's great as well, but just too pocket sticky for me. Definitely is great protection though.
The bezel is so weak it even scratches by sliding the phone in and out of your pocket. So, not a big deal imho!
My Diztronic case hasn't scratched my bezel? lol
FatalityBoyZahy said:
My Diztronic case hasn't scratched my bezel? lol
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've read threads of many other people complaining about the same issue. Even the Diztronic store on amazon has complaints of it. I remember having this issue with their cases on my Galaxy Nexus as well.
If your bezel isn't scratched yet, consider yourself lucky.
However, aside from that the Diztronic is the most solid TPU case you will find.
tomhub389 said:
Let me start by saying the Diztronic TPU is amazing and absolutely perfect in every way, except one. The top and bottom chrome bezel are getting scratched by the sharp edges of the case. It's not from dirt and dust or just rubber marks, they're actual little scratches. I'm looking to buy one of the "S-Line" cases (on amazon because I have gift card credit). Others have mentioned that the edge is not as sharp on these and I do not mind the buttons being harder to press. Are the i-Blason and Cimo brands essentially the same or what? The i-Blason looks a little more refined and is rated better. Thanks!
edit: forgot, I have an Ionic guardian and it's great as well, but just too pocket sticky for me. Definitely is great protection though.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This case will not actually scratch the phone, but dirt and dust will.
BravoMotorola said:
This case will not actually scratch the phone, but dirt and dust will.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I disagree, my phone simply does not get exposed to dirt or sand that would scratch. Take of the case and rub your finger just inside the top and bottom inside edge of it. It's fairly sharp for TPU
TPU is just plastic, it won't scratch other plastic. That would be a horrible feature for a case lol.
tomhub389 said:
I disagree, my phone simply does not get exposed to dirt or sand that would scratch. Take of the case and rub your finger just inside the top and bottom inside edge of it. It's fairly sharp for TPU
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Feels like any other case? lol
Sent from my Nexus 4 using xda premium
i have both diztronic and i-blason.
i like the diztronic better. the i-blason is softer but it fits loose. diztronic fits like a glove. you will get more dirt/grit/crap between your phone and the i-blason case due to its fitment.
from all the phones ive owned with a shiney bezel, they all get micro scratches on them. theres no avoiding it unless you get a full body cover like xoskin/xtremeguard/bodyarmors/etc that covers the bezel. just use your phone as intended. any cases will get crap trap between your phone and case. just be sure to take it off regularly to clean it out.
I have the diztronic case on my n4 and the quality and fit is outstanding. I bought it off eBay and had it shipped to the UK from the States and it was still cheaper by a long shot than anything available here in the UK.
I use it with an invisible shield front and back protector and although it was fiddly getting it on and making sure the screen protector didn't lift, its now on and I have no lift at all.
Sent from my Nexus 4 using xda premium
AW: Diztronic vs i-Blason vs Cimo TPU cases
I can too say that diztronic is the best tpu out there.
Because different types of plastic can't have different levels of hardness and different surface finishes (like polished chrome plastic) aren't more vulnerable to scuffing. Yes, they're really small fine scratches but they're there and I wasn't expecting them.
Sent from my Nexus 4 using xda app-developers app
I have a Diztronic case and the fit is prefect. No scratching at all. The only issue I have is the screen protector lifts when the case goes on or off. The film is centered well just for some reason always snags a bit on the bottom corners.
Sent from my Nexus 4
is there really a difference between a 1$ TPU case and all the other ones ? I thought they were all made in the same factory...

[Q] Is there a slim case that does NOT obstruct the phone's curved edge?

I currently have the Ringke Slim case, but I am a bit upset that the edges of the case come up higher than the bottom of the curved edge.
Are there any slim cases out there that do not obstruct the curvature of the phone's edge?
Thanks.
You can try Spigens slim case, or Nillkin.
Sent from my Nexus 4 using xda premium
^Fs said:
I currently have the Ringke Slim case, but I am a bit upset that the edges of the case come up higher than the bottom of the curved edge.
Are there any slim cases out there that do not obstruct the curvature of the phone's edge?
Thanks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have the Spigen Ultra Slim case, and the sides still come up higher than the curved edge. But it still does "show" the curved edge, you just can't feel it. I think cases are made like that so that when you face them down on the surface, they provide a little bit of clearance for the screen to not touch the surface (and holds the case intact to the phone). So yeah, I doubt there's a case that is gonna serve your needs.
I am using the i-Blason Slim Fit S Line Flexible TPU Case and am happy with it; am not sure precisely how it differs from the Ringke Slim case, but I can say that none of the phone's functionality is compromised. It does give a firmer 'grip' feel, and appears to provide protection for the phone.
You could actually make the case come up and hug the top and bottom of the phone to clear the screen from touching the surface while keeping the sides uncovered, but no manufacturers seem to want to make one. I've been keeping an eye on this since forever and so far nothing.
Sent from my Nexus 4 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

[Q] Case vs. Skin vs. naked

Since the S6 is very slippery but very good looking because of the glass, do you use a case because you want to be safe or do you use a skin to retain the phones thin body or you prefer it naked without anything on and around it?
Skin and Case! :good:
Definitely a case with shock absorbing properties. I'm not spending close to a grand on a glass encased phone just so it can have cracks on it.
I think the phone is gorgeous, but use a Verus aluminum bumper in order to get low drop protection and camera protection while keeping the phone mostly original looking. If it weren't for the protruding camera, I've consider carrying the phone bare. (Though I would be concerned with slippage.)
For comparison, I didn't hate the looks the of the S4, but I wasn't thrilled with them either so I put a Spigen Neo Hybrid on, which gave it a look that I liked more, while still looking like a phone and not a case. (Most people I showed my S4 to loved it and didn't realize it was a case.)
I think it's interesting that you bring this up because I asked a similar question in the "show us your case" thread, and people took offense to what I was asking. My basic question was "Do you use big UAG/Otterbox cases merely for protection, or do you prefer the look over the look of the bare phone." I guess I worded it poorly, as I mostly got defensiveness of case choices. Hopefully your thread gets better responses.
(In my photo below, the difference in screen glare and body color is only from a difference in lighting - I used different setups on different days and didn't match the screen lighting. There is no "glare" from the Verus case.)
Sent from my SM-G920F using Tapatalk
Spigen backless silver satin bumper
Sent from my SM-G920F using Tapatalk
naked is not a good idea.
friend dropped the phone and completely shattered the screen and created a spider web
flusha said:
naked is not a good idea. friend dropped the phone and completely shattered the screen and created a spider web
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
(Sounds to me like dropping the phone is a bad idea. )
That would be the risk to not having a potentially unsightly case.
Case + skin. case to protect from falls and skin to protect from scratches
Got both the uag maverick and ash case, prefer the ash on my sapphire black s6, and the maverick on a white s6 both look crazy awesome tho
I use a Dbrand skin and tempered glass screen protector in normal days. Just bought a spigen rugged armour as I'm gonna go on a 3 day camp and I don't wanna risk breaking it.
The dbrand skin should suffice for everyday use. It protects the rear glass from cracking if I ever drop it. And the tempered glass helps with the front glass. The only thing that is unprotected in the event of a drop is my sides.
It's your choice, do you like the feel of the S6 naked? Or would you rather have a cheap piece of TPU protecting it?
Also, if you choose to go naked/skin, the chamfered edges of the aluminium is very soft so it scratches rather easily. You can get a metal bumper to help with drop and impact protection on the sides.
Case. I would consider a skin, but the extra protection is nice. No way I'm carrying this phone naked. Then again, I never carry phones naked anyway.
Dbrand black leather skin on the back, otherwise naked. I hate cases, I'd rather pay for insurance and deductible for replacement than compromise the look and feel of a phone I like.
I just use screen guard both sides it looks and feels good
I had an iron shield on it but removed it about a week ago because the aluminum bumper was killing my GPS signal. Somehow in that week time I got a scratch on my screen. Make sure to put a screen protector on too!
Going naked. I did not pay $650+ to put this in a $5 case. I want to enjoy the phone as it was meant to be. I only have a tampered glass on top and that's good enough for me.
Sent from my SM-G920T using Tapatalk
Have a skin - slickwrap at the back, a case and a tempered glass on front.
Rhinoshield bumper for me with screen protectors on both front and back
ipaq_101 said:
Skin and Case! :good:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Brand skin with Rhino Shield bumpers
im using melkco italian cowhide leather herman series case , prefer using genuine leather case for my protection rather than back cover case or softcase, anyone fans from using genuine leather case maybe can sharing to me?:good:

My review on the Ghostek Atomic Slim for Note 9

I bought the Ghostek Atomic Slim for the Note 9. I was thinking this and Spigen tough Armor or I_blason and Spigen tough Armor but with I-blason I had to remove Screen and wasn't sure if it will fit on the encased Holster due to the corners. So I went with the Ghostek, the case is nice and feels good, it does have bigger screen lip in front which Covers more Than other cases which should protect it more.
Design is good, it is Hard plastic with aluminum frame with Clear Polycarbonate hard back. The aluminum and plastic extends out of the Polycarbonate to give it extra protection. The extra lip around the screen does not protrude into the use of the phone and you barely realize. Grip jo a not bad and has some ridges but aluminum makes it a bit slippery.
The issue I see for the case is that the openning for the Spen is bigger then I would like and the aluminum and plastic is not reassuring as they are separate pieces.
Before the note 9 I had the S8 plus and Spigen tough Armor and protected phone quite well, I've dropped it a bit accidentally and nothing happened except tempered glass Cracking a bit on corner.
I did get a Spigen tough Armor for the Note 9. But was looking for a protector that was close to same protection but could see the blue Color and design. The Ghostek fit the Criteria and reading the reviews on the note8 seemed good, the difference is that the Note 8 had more protection where the Spen was but harder to remove but Note 9 is less protection on Spen with easier removal.
The 2nd issue is that the volume buttons are hard to press and make it difficult to use if need to lower or raise volume.
Without those issues I think it would have been great daily driver and no need for screen removal or flaps on charging port from other cases.
Not sure if any of you guys have used it or bought it for Note 9 get.
so I'm hesitant go use it regularly and just use it on weekends.
This is my thoughts on this case not sure if you have Opinions if I'm just paranoid on the spen Corner. Attached are pictures of it
Edited:
Forgot to mention it does work with Whitestone Dome Glass.
lmanlo said:
I bought the Ghostek Atomic Slim for the Note 9. I was thinking this and Spigen tough Armor or I_blason and Spigen tough Armor but with I-blason I had to remove Screen and wasn't sure if it will fit on the encased Holster due to the corners. So I went with the Ghostek, the case is nice and feels good, it does have bigger screen lip in front which Covers more Than other cases which should protect it more.
Design is good, it is Hard plastic with aluminum frame with Clear Polycarbonate hard back. The aluminum and plastic extends out of the Polycarbonate to give it extra protection. The extra lip around the screen does not protrude into the use of the phone and you barely realize. Grip jo a not bad and has some ridges but aluminum makes it a bit slippery.
The issue I see for the case is that the openning for the Spen is bigger then I would like and the aluminum and plastic is not reassuring as they are separate pieces.
Before the note 9 I had the S8 plus and Spigen tough Armor and protected phone quite well, I've dropped it a bit accidentally and nothing happened except tempered glass Cracking a bit on corner.
I did get a Spigen tough Armor for the Note 9. But was looking for a protector that was close to same protection but could see the blue Color and design. The Ghostek fit the Criteria and reading the reviews on the note8 seemed good, the difference is that the Note 8 had more protection where the Spen was but harder to remove but Note 9 is less protection on Spen with easier removal.
The 2nd issue is that the volume buttons are hard to press and make it difficult to use if need to lower or raise volume.
Without those issues I think it would have been great daily driver and no need for screen removal or flaps on charging port from other cases.
Not sure if any of you guys have used it or bought it for Note 9 get.
so I'm hesitant go use it regularly and just use it on weekends.
This is my thoughts on this case not sure if you have Opinions if I'm just paranoid on the spen Corner. Attached are pictures of it
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
A very fair review, thanks. I love it when folks add negatives to items they review. Makes it sound more real.
Sent from my SM-N960U1 using Tapatalk

Samsung Rugged case vs Defender. What do you prefer? Trying to decide!

I'm currently sporting my Defender, but I miss my Samsung Rugged case.
Anyway, which would you pick if you have to chose one?
Has anyone dropped their phone in the Samsung Rugged case and would you trust the rugged case on a fall? Lips are fine but the sides are more exposed and pretty thin as well so shock might be an issue too.
Which should I go with? I love the built in kickstand by drop protection with it concerns me.
Blues fan said:
I'm currently sporting my Defender, but I miss my Samsung Rugged case.
Anyway, which would you pick if you have to chose one?
Has anyone dropped their phone in the Samsung Rugged case and would you trust the rugged case on a fall? Lips are fine but the sides are more exposed and pretty thin as well so shock might be an issue too.
Which should I go with? I love the built in kickstand by drop protection with it concerns me.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm actually on the flip side of your predicament, I have the Samsung Rugged case but thinking about trying out the Defender Pro but I am worried the WhiteStone Dome glass will not fit. I actually just dropped my phone accidentally about 4' high onto a tile floor and there was no damage to the phone just a scratch or 2 on one of the corners of the case.
I had the defender for a few days and returned it. It was too bulky, didn't slide in my pocket easily and the pen cut out is huge but still interferes with the removal of the pen. I don't care for the port covers and the plastic rim resting on the glass either. For all the above reasons I went back to the rugged case. I've dropped my phone a few times with no damage the phone. They weren't all that high drops but I do feel the case offers adequate protection without adding much bulk.
If it's an Otterbox, it's the Commuter for me. It's the sensible tough case, IMO. It looks mature and not gaudy-looking like most "tough" cases out there.

Categories

Resources