I was just curious if any developers (aside from SDBags) was developing for the Tf701 also?
I have heard that the Tf701 tablet is awesome, but not alot developer support is going on with it, specifically with AOSP Roms, as these roms could really make this tablet extremely fast. I'm sure may tf701 users would appreciate the approach and there may be donations related to your work. This is something I hope could happen, since the more developers available for the tablet, the better for its overall lifespan. Thanks again for all your guys help and support with the TF700 and any other tablets you have all worked on!!
Ahem. Did you check the Development and Original Development sections for the TF701???
There's an unofficial AOKP rom and pershoot is developing the CM11. Plus sbdags with CROMBi-KK, CROMi-X and a stock rooted rom. That's it.
Plenty for me....
berndblb said:
Ahem. Did you check the Development and Original Development sections for the TF701???
There's an unofficial AOKP rom and pershoot is developing the CM11. Plus sbdags with CROMBi-KK, CROMi-X and a stock rooted rom. That's it.
Plenty for me....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have the tf300t right now, and maybe because developing Custom Roms was a bigger thing back then, there were alot more developers interested in creating Roms. I was just curious if any developers from the tf700 tablet section was interested in also developing for the tf701. I already said in my first post, aside from sdbags. I know he does alot of hard work on his roms and he has always been a supporter since I first unlocked my tf300t. I was just curious about if there were any developers interested, because after Asus's Stock OTA's are over, there will be no way to get any more recent software updates, aside from the developers wonderful help.
My tf300t was supposed to be stuck on Jellybean to Asus's logic, and because there were many talented developers (like sdbags), I am running the latest version of kitkat on my tf300t. I was just curious as to if anyone else was interested, and I'm sure it would be helpful to the developers at the tf701 section to have some more help so there is a smaller workload with every developer.
I am not putting down or bashing any developers that are working on tf701 roms. I am happy that there are developers even working on this tablet, but I was just curious if any others were interested in working on it or helping out any of the current developers on that tablet.
Related
Hi
These last days, and this is a joy, a few new/or not developers are beginning to create roms on ICS.
Each rom has a difference with others, and i noticed some roms has qualities that are not found on others, but need the advantages of some others.
A few users asked it before, i offer today with this thread (i hope this is not a mistake, and that it will remains clean), to vote. The target is to ask to our developers to create a sort of developing team, around a "unic" rom.
Their competences put in common should be awsome, don't you think?
If you want to help me to make this thread known by developers, do not hesitate to link it in your signature, by this way, dev in the development section could see the result of the vote, that i hope to be YES
Thx for your responses, and please take this thread clean
Want a good idea !
Google is doing this. Wait for the official release...
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using xda premium
It is called the CM team.... facepalm
FYI, Koush is an integral member of that team (not that they have been working on ICS as a team yet)
This is a terribly biased survey. Where's the option for "No, we'd like to see a diverse selection of Roms"
With all due respect, "Nope, i prefer lot of partially working roms" is a very suggestive option, that says you're critical of the current work, or just impatient.
Seriously dude, ics JUST CAME OUT. Teams will form, and work will get done in due time.
Patience, grasshopper.
Have you no humour?
If you say no, indeed it can be for other reasons..
In fact, the target is to reach an almost stable and fully functionnal BEFORE the official release...
after this, no need to have a team, on a official base, a dev can do something good alone.
As you like to call me grasshoper, and with all the due respect , i would like to call you embittered cod-fish.
Does it fit enough to you sir?
We could possibly convince the CM team to cook CM for our device too. We need to request them in their forums.
Please add your requests to these threads.
http://forum.cyanogenmod.com/topic/39663-cm-for-galaxy-r-gti9103/
http://forum.cyanogenmod.com/topic/40719-please-port-cyanogenmod-to-galaxy-r-i9103/
http://forum.cyanogenmod.com/topic/30930-samsung-galaxy-r-z-gt-i9103/
http://forum.cyanogenmod.com/topic/37018-please-give-us-cyanogen-mod-for-samsung-galaxy-r-i9103/
I don't think it's gonna make much difference. None of mods/devs have ever answered to any of those threads.
I think that our guys will port it faster.
m.kochan10 said:
I don't think it's gonna make much difference. None of mods/devs have ever answered to any of those threads.
I think that our guys will port it faster.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The reason is the requests are too few for anyone to notice.
The Devs wont make a ROM for just 5 or 6 people. We need to have a mass request.
Let us give it a try
You may be right, It doesn't harm to try. But I don't think creating new threads is a good idea since we already have....nine of them. Opening new threads will just make mods pissed. We need to chose the one major thread - in section Unofficial Ports (that's the place for unsupported devices), and write there.
I agree with you 100%.
But the question is, which thread do we support?
From what I've seen, the cyanogenmod team won't just take on a new phone like that. Maybe after we have a stable unofficial port, but not til then. Look at how the huawei ideos 1850 progressed, it got a lot of attention after someone ported it for themselves, and now it has official CM. keep going guys but if you really want CM then I think it's better to help get AOSP for R than to spam CM forums...
Sent from my GT-I9103 using XDA App
I absolutely agree, that none gets cm just like that: "-please give us cyanogen!" "-Ok here you go"
(There are already nine threads - every new user seems to want to have his own thread Even I opened one in donators lounge )
Another example. I don't remember what it was for device, but users contacted directly one of cm devs and then created a donation thread, collected money and bought him a phone. Once they got CM development started for real.
I think the max what they can do for us is welcome a new developer from us with this device and let him do CM for R :/. Thats could happen with LG GT540 and there was a veeeeeeeeeeeeery big spam about CM for it.
+1
CM is the beast..
I guess after our device gets ICS it will step into the world of real dev'ing.
If someone has good experience with repos and AOSP + CM7 stuff please help me with my git repo here:
http://github.com/EmoBoiix3/android_device_samsung_galaxyr
Although we don't have many devs who own this device, it feels very nice that we have a couple of members who are willing to put their best efforts to port the ROM.
We could show our gratitude and support when they bring out the early builds by donating. Please show your support friends.
+1
Must need cm7
Sent from my GT-I9103 using xda premium
And regarding the ICS for our phone, I can sense some delay. Samsung leaks firmwares frequently during development. Probably because they know that we guys flash it and report bugs here. It would save them time on testing.
Couple of builds have leaked for Galaxy SII.
None for ours yet. Same with Optimus 2x. The users from O2x forum say that the OEMs are waiting for NVidia to release the sources.
We can expect ICS for i9103 in Q2
^^
thats a sad bit of news
ICS
Official ICS for SGR is due Q1 of 2012. I think only after release of the official rom, devs will start working
Good news as the first Tegra 2 device running Android 4 (ICS) will be on sale starting 15 Jan. 2012.
The device is Acer Iconia Tab A200 and it will be a milestone for a ICS port for all the other devices sharing the same CPU/GPU.
The original story here:
Acer Expands Popular Tablet Lineup With Iconia Tab A200, a Full-Featured HD Tablet at an Attractive $329 Price
What about CM?
Hello,
Is anyone still developing of the cyanogenmod for Galaxy R GT-I9103?
I'ld like to offer free allocation for your builds on cyanogenmod.su or any new domain you want!
I have over 1K users, who will be happy to test CM7 or CM9 builds, make bugreports and donate.
Maybe you know someone else who develops cyanogenmod, I'll be grateful for any response.
We have few devs that work on AOSP and CM7. Check these threads:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1558637
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1548775
Yes , that's good . If someone in the CM team is good with kernels maybe they can help me
Defy-ing all limits.
Sorry if this was answered already. At the moment there is 4 you could choose from. I've read countless posts in each thread but that may be the reason why this goes over my head. I'm just trying to understand the difference between them all. I also thought I read that xoomdev said the devs couldn't make their own builds and could only release the official bricks. I know this was answered over in one if the rootz threads too but there's so many posts it would be like finding a needle in a haystack. So if anyone has the time and would like to elaborate, thank you in advance.
I am confused by this as well - it seems like there are multiple aokp and CM10 builds going around.
Very simply put you have the official builds of each which is how the main developers want the ROM to act/feel/look/etc... They also provide the code for these builds so any other developers that want to can add/subtract little tweaks here and there to make it how THEY want it to act/feel/look/etc... And that is what the unofficial builds are, "aftermarket" developers tweaking it.
EDIT: Also, if you have a bug on the official build of either then there's a 99% chance it's on all the other ones too.
Brian Gove said:
Very simply put you have the official builds of each which is how the main developers want the ROM to act/feel/look/etc... They also provide the code for these builds so any other developers that want to can add/subtract little tweaks here and there to make it how THEY want it to act/feel/look/etc... And that is what the unofficial builds are, "aftermarket" developers tweaking it.
EDIT: Also, if you have a bug on the official build of either then there's a 99% chance it's on all the other ones too.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you!
Hi People,
We all know how hard our Devs have worked to port 4.2 our device, We all will always appreciate that but in the end 4.2 is still not rock stable if compared to 4.1
I would like to recommend / advice our developers to continue working on 4.1 only
I understand the amount of hardwork involved by our developers but the bottom line is that its really not worth it to work on a 4.2 ROM
I hope we all will understand
Hi bro! I understand your concerns but as far as my opinion goes, 4.2 ROM's are much better than earlier versions!! Try the UltraSLIM ROM or Mere ROM! They are very smooth indeed! And Now I believe, PureXperia amd Color ROM are just awesome!! What issues are u facing?
Great, thanks for the opinion and request...Not going to turn this into a best rom thread.
XDA is not a support site, members are encouraged to use this site to learn how to do things on their own, and then other members can always jump in to assist with development. :highfive:
Basically I want to learn how to port AOSP from the beginning, I know a few languages and I have flashed custom roms but now I want to learn to develop them, to be able to contribute and also not depend so much on the work of others. I thought I would read the official documentation of source.andoid.com, it seemed quite complete. Well the question is reluctant with this last.
It seems a good starting point? Is it unrealistic to want to start developing custom roms? It's possible?
Your comment means a lot to me!
Regards, |3eer.