Database Info

[KERNEL SOURCE] ZenDROID - Updated 7/13! BFS v304 (Kconfig Option!), tuned,SIO,BUILDS

The Zen Kernel Project presents...
The ZenDROID Kernel
----------------------
What is it?
* Kernels for Android devices
* If you have suggestions, patches, fixes, whatever - they will be reviewed and implemented like a "community kernel", and you'll get credit if desired
What's so special about it?
* Idk, it's zen - each one will end up being different somehow, but implementing a few things others have done and implementing what others have not done.
---------------------
ZenDROID 2.6.29 For the EVO 4g (based on HTC's official source)
Changes over HTC official source (See gitweb for the most detail
7/13/2010
- BFS v304 backported to 2.6.29 - Stopped here as it was a little bit of work to get to this point, I will continue through 318 later on only taking changes that will have a significant effect.
- BFS is tuned to be less aggressive with the nice levels, this should fix any lag that other bfs kernels experience, although without this adjustment on DC 3.2.3 my system is lightning fast.
- Remove nice from the workqueue and kthread (for both CFS and BFS)
- toast's audio boost (thanks)
7/5/2010
- Add AOSP atmel touch screen driver (from toast's kernel), but implemented differently. Selecting CONFIG_AOSP will use atmel_aosp.c, which will fix the screen for aosp. The Kconfig option is the first one above general setup, may be needed for some other drivers in the future, but for now only changes the touch screen one.
- Undervolt patches (no OC or anything yet, that will be a separate patch or Kconfig option or whatever) - about .1V less, seems what they're going with around the town
- Simple I/O scheduler. Based on deadline, v(r), and no-op perfect for SSDs or flash discs. I expect it to be ideal for the EVO and other android phones.
- Made lowmemorykiller less aggressive by default
- Some CFS adjustments (no bfs til' i start froyo, we need to research android's nice settings)
Branch: evo4g-src-2.6.29
GIT IS UP!
http://git.zen-kernel.org/?p=kernel/zendroid.git;a=summary
Like I said, don't plan anything earth shattering for the .29 kernel, but there is still more I just got started suggestions/patches are welcome.
DOWNLOADABLE BUILDS
*** Not yet availlable, I have a few things I want to implement like the 30fps hack fix (will also be a Kconfig option), 5 point multi touch (Kconfig option), overclocking (may not be in the first build, not really a priority over the other things)
I have tested this already on DC, the system is very fast and no lag or anything is present. The simple I/O scheduler seems to be working great with no flaws, and there is no touch lag - the system actually feels quite a bit faster. - This is with no 30 fps fix!

This sounds like a really good idea, but what else can you bring to the table other than a well-maintained kernel? Look at the Nexus board, it's ALL kernels, most of which are pretty well maintained. I think it's great that you wanna do this, but you'll have to provide something to differentiate yourself from all the other custom kernels.
Making this a community kernel much like CyanogenMod is on the ROM side would be a good way, like allowing users to submit their own patches that you could review and choose to incorporate (or not ) would be a good way IMO.
Just giving some suggestions, best of luck!
Regards,
Jesse C.

i see you are going for BFS cpu scheduler as the default; i know that on the Nexus One, the BFS was very unstable and the CFS worked like a charm; not sure, if there are enough similarities between the N1 and Evo, but will the BFS also be unstable for the most part?
i had the N1 prior to getting the EVO and tried few BFS kernels and it wasn't as stable as the CFS; BFS ran the phone at a higher temperature and few other things that i can't remember now
EDIT: as for kernels, would like to see Overclocked kernel as well as Undervolted kernels (similar to maybe IntersectRaven's kernel on the Nexus One forum, where he uses AVS and undervolted to 925mV, which was best for N1 from experience)

Welcome! look forward to seeing your kernel!
Josh

Sounds good bro. I plan to start working on custom kernels as soon as the holiday is over so if you need any help just let me know.

Welcome, we need more kernels for CyanogenMod 6.0.
Have fun.

The broken BFS must have been poorly implemented or a really old version or something. I don't foresee any problems, if there are I'll work them out with CK.
It's not entirely about being 100% unique, more so being another option. And options are good in this open source community Although I'm totally open to suggestions.
Like I said, I don't expect the BFS problems of those kernels, but we'll certainly work them out if need be. I have not had a bfs-related bug report in quite a long time. (pre 2xx). I'd imagine the benefits could be quite surprising actually

One of our developers made an i/o scheduler, SIO "simple I/O scheduler"
It's based on no-op and deadline PERFECT for SSD or just non-spinning disks. I imagine it would be perfect for phones, although I'd like to do some heavy testing before pushing that because of how young it still is (although it's very simple so any bugs shouldn't be especially hidden like they may be in say, cfq)

Updated first post, GIT is up and also updated the plans

Ok guys, about ready to use although I've done no testing yet. I AM implementing a zen-sched patch which will allow selection of BFS or CFS, and i have a few more tricks for CFS up my sleeve yet.
We'll get to BFS 318 , a few things in between aren't worth porting but otherwise it'll be mostly complete.
I also added compcache 0.6.2, that's all located in drivers/block (where I used to put it on the older kernels, now it's in staging but oh well)

Updated!
Now we have a proper backported BFS, read the OP!
I flashed a test to my phone over the DC rom i'm running and everything works great! Using SIO and BFS v3xx

bbedward said:
Updated!
Now we have a proper backported BFS, read the OP!
I flashed a test to my phone over the DC rom i'm running and everything works great! Using SIO and BFS v3xx
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I cant wait for the download thanks for all the hard work

Sweet man! Thanks for the dedication to the project. Looking forward to it

[OUTDATED AND REMOVED BY KIFNO] Kifno's Scripts v2.x.x Series

Kifno's HeroC Universal Scripts v2.0.1
PLEASE READ THE ENTIRE FIRST POST BEFORE POSTING
THE CREDITING/PERMISSION ISSUE IS DONE AND OVER WITH EVER SINCE THE V1.x THREAD SO PLEASE NO MORE POST ABOUT THAT, OR YOU WILL BE REPORTED TO A MOD! ALSO I DID NOT JUST COMPILE A BUNCH OF MODS TOGETHER! IF YOU READ THE CREDITS YOU'LL SEE I ASKED TO USE THEIR IDEAS AND I IMPROVED THEM AND INCLUDED THEM ALONGSIDE MY WORK! SO PLEASE NO POST ABOUT I HAVEN'T DONE ANYTHING BECAUSE IT IS OFFENSIVE TO ME WHEN I KNOW I HAVE DONE EVERYTHING IN THIS SCRIPT FOR OUR HEROES, FROM MY CUSTOM VALUES TO THE IMPROVEMENTS OF OTHERS IDEAS OF WHICH I HAVE CREDITED AND GOT PERMISSION FROM AND SUBMITTED MY IMPROVED VERSION TO.
Thanks
- Kifno​
What did I do?
- Read change log
My Explanation for the tweaks/scripts
Code:
Yes these are the tweaks I apply. They are what I think are the best
values for the file(s). Now I'll go into detail as to what each file is and why I set
a new value for it. If you don't like my opinion as to why my new value is
better please explain in a positive manner why you think so or just well...
then, no offense but just keep it to yourself. If you can't say anything
that is constructive POSITIVE critism without using language that could lead to
an argument/provakative language then please don't post here. Now on to the
explanations.
[B]Kernel Tweaks:[/B]
This specifies a period of time that the kernel gives a process that is holding a
file lease. After it has sent a signal to that process notifying, it that another
process is waiting to pen the file. In simpler terms this means that the kernel
has given the process a set amount of time it can hold a file after another
process has notifying it that it wants the file. The deafult had the time higher. I
set it lower. Although it doesn't make much of a difference, ever millionth of a
second counts :D
[CODE]/proc/sys/fs/lease-break-time
This enables cfq compatibility with older kernel models. This results in better
performance, for example more smoothness in apps and the launcher
Code:
/proc/sys/kernel/sched_compat_yield
This value has to correspond with the file-max value so this is raised according
to the value of the file-max. Why did I raise the file-max? Keep reading silly
Code:
/proc/sys/kernel/ngroup_max
Disables some annoying cfs scheduler feature (which is why I don't use the cfs
scheduler in my tweak, I use the noop scheduler) whic increase the UI's
performace just a bit.
Code:
/proc/sys/kernel/sched_features
Sets the maximum number of file-handles that the android kernel will put aside
for other use, share, or put in memory for other use. Usually increasing this
value is a good thing compared to the default value. Which in our case, it was.
If our kernels had an inode file we'd want the value of that to be 2-3 times as
much as the file max. Its a good tweaking rule I thought I'd let you know just
in case you're on linux
Code:
/proc/sys/fs/file-max
This is the max percentage of active processes that can be filled with dirty
pages before the pdflush begins writing them This MAY OR MAY NOT be the
default value for most kernels, but just in case it isn't I set it anyway. Why?
Becuase I want to make sure that if the dirty pages is about 19MB - 40MB of
our RAM, that pdflush begins writing
Code:
/proc/sys/vm/dirty_background_ratio
How agressively memory is "swapped" between disk and swap space.
Code:
/proc/sys/vm/swappiness
Lowering this is a good thing if on a system with slow I/O speeds between the
disk. But if this is lowered too much the I/O will get "constapated" and just
slow the phone down.
Code:
/proc/sys/vm/dirty_expire_centisecs
Doesn't do much but messing with the pdflush's timing of things. Little improvement but everything adds up
Code:
/proc/sys/vm/dirty_writeback_centisecs
Management of the phone's processes by setting a max amount of memory the
phone allows for dirty pages before stopping the processes writing.
Code:
/proc/sys/vm/dirty_ratio
Sets kernel priority for getting/releasing inodes and dentry cache files.
Higher = getting inodes and dentry cache files back more quickly
Lower = releasing inodes and dentry cache files a bit more quickly
Code:
/proc/sys/vm/vfs_cache_pressure
Changes the govenor depending on screen state
Code:
$*GOV
Changed timeslice lenght for better performance when using the phone, and
bettery battery when you aren't using the phone (screen off).
Code:
/proc/sys/kernel/sched_latency_ns
/proc/sys/kernel/sched_min_granularity_ns
/proc/sys/kernel/sched_wakeup_granularity_ns
Cpu frequencies. Pretty simple to explain
Code:
/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_max_freq
/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_min_freq
Amount of time before the interactive governor decides to change the cpu
speed.
Code:
/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/interactive/min_sample_time
This is how often the kernel changes the frequency.
Code:
/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/conservative/sampling_rate
This is the max rate at which the kernel can change frequencies.
Code:
/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/conservative/sampling_rate_max
Thi is teh min rate at which the kernel can change frequencies.
Code:
/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/conservative/sampling_rate_min
Average CPU usage from kernel's sampling rates which help it determine
wheather or not it should increase the CPU frequency.
Code:
/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/conservative/up_threshold
This is what I use to find the battery percentage for the battery percentage
profile.
Code:
$capacity
This is what I use to find the temperature for the temperature profile.
Code:
$temp
Determines if phone is sleep or awake for screen state profile
Code:
$sleeping/$awake
This is the amount of power that was given towards wifi. I just upped the
amount a bit BETTER WIFI WOOHOO
Code:
/sys/module/acpuclock_arm11/parameters/pwrc_khz
/sys/module/acpuclock_arm11/parameters/wfi_khz
I/O Scheduler Tweaks:
IMO the noop scheduler is better for our read and write speeds. Simple as that.
And what more than a better scheduler for read and write speeds to go along
with the sd card speed tweaks?
Code:
echo noop > /sys/block/*/queue/scheduler
Set so that the phone's process, ram, or any other request won't get out of
order. This improves the performance because it helps our internal drive and
extral drive (if using apps2sd or data2ext or data2sd). How think of it as
organizing the request a little bit better than the default value This is more
of a being safe thing in fact, but also a little extra performance didn't hurt
anyone did it?
Code:
/sys/block/mmcblk0/queue/nr_requests
Network Tweaks:
These change the DNS server to 0.0.0.0 which in fact helped my mobile data
speeds go up by about 50-100kbps This DNS server was better than
google's or opendns (but I've always had problems with opendns). Though
google's dns server came close to being the better of the three this DNS server
was the best after being tested many times
Code:
nameserver 0.0.0.0 /etc/resolv.conf
The following are the combination of strings and values that I played with in the
beginning days of this tweak so configure our network speeds. It took about 6
hours of testing to come up with the best combination for the heroc And like
I've asked and I've said about at least 20x when asked, exactly how is our
CDMA network affected by these values when they aren't even meant for it?
They just do, now shh and enjoy your better 3G speeds But seriously ask
someone in the networking field or someone who works for sprint but is into
rooting androids (so you won't get into trouble because of hacking their data
tower speeds they give out to our herocs ). I did and it has something to do
data towers, I can't explain exactly how because once I heard that I was so
excited I just stopped listening as well
Code:
ro.ril.hsxpa=2
ro.ril.gprsclass=8
ro.ril.hep=1
ro.ril.hsdpa.category=24
ro.ril.enable.3g.prefix=1
ro.ril.htcmaskw1.bitmask=4294967295
ro.ril.htcmaskw1=14449
ro.ril.hsupa.category=3
wifi.supplicant_scan_interval=20
How frequently the keepalive probes are sent out is determined by tcp_keepalive_intvl This is value is dependent upon tcp_keepalive_probes as well, which determines how many probes are sent out. This determines the time not to kill the connection. I lowered this value so connections will be killed faster.
Code:
tcp_keepalive_intvl
tcp_keepalive_probes
Time to hold sockets, which I lowered.
Code:
tcp_fin_timeout
Socket receive buffer. Increased to increase sockets received from network.
Code:
rmem_default
Socket send buffer. Increased to increase sockets sent to the network.
Code:
wmem_default
Maximum socket receive buffer. Increased to increase the total amount of sockets we can receive from the network.
Code:
rmem_max
Maximum socket send buffer. Increased to increase the total amount of sockets we can send to the network.
Code:
wmem_max
Memory Tweaks:
This is the tweak I used to configure our internal task killer. I had to experiment
with this a lot becaue certain values made music playback very choppy when
the screen was in sleep mode. But at last these are the values I came up with
to keep our free ram high while not interfering with everyday usage too much
Code:
echo "3072,6144,9216,21000,23000,25000" > /sys/module/lowmemorykiller/parameters/minfree
SD Card Tweaks:
This is the cache of the sd card. This was set to 128 so I bumped it up to 1024. Other values may be better for your phone and it's sd card but this is the
most compatible across the board. Still a performance increase but just not the
optimal value. Why? Because all heros are different as well as that plust the sd
card everyone is using
Code:
read_ahead_kb
[/CODE]
Requirements:
- Rooted HTC Hero CDMA
- Kernel w/ Interactive, Smartass, Conservative, Powersave, Ondemand, and Performace Governors (Grab deca kernel and compile from source if not using cyanogenmod based roms, or use sobe's kernel)
ATTENTION​
DO NOT, I REPEAT, DO NOT USE SETCPU/OVERCLOCKWIDGET/COLLIN_PH/DECA'S BATTERY TWEAK, OR ANY BATTERY TWEAKING/CPU OVERLOCKING UTILITIES/SCRIPTS WITH THIS MOD!!!!!! WARNING USE THIS MOD AT YOUR OWN RISK!!! I TAKE NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR WHAT HAPPENS TO YOUR PHONE IF SOMETHING GOES WRONG! ALTHOUGH IF SOMETHING DOES HAPPEN I WILL HELP YOU AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE!!!
INSTRUCTIONS
Installing Instructions (Recovery Menu):
Difficulty: Easy
Reboot Recovery
Download and Flash Kifno's Universal HeroC Script
REMOVED UNTIL RELEASE OF V3.0.0 SOMETHINGS WERE BROKEN IN ROMS WITH THIS RELEASE.....IF YOU HAVE V2.0.1 DON'T USE IT WAIT UNTIL V3.0.0
- THANKS
Wipe cache, and dalvik-cache
Reboot into system
Enjoy
Removal Instructions (Recovery Menu):
Difficulty: Easy
Download the removal zip for latest version
Get It Here
Reboot Recovery
Flash it
Reboot
TESTED AND SUCCESSFUL ON
- Cyanogenmod 7.0.2
- NfiniteFX's Stock Rom
- LiquidSense 2.1.1
- Kifno's 2.1 Sense Roms
- Aosp Gingerbread
- GingerSense/Rock Steady
- Aosp Froyo
- CM6.1
TESTED AND SOMETIMES FAILED (BOOTLOOP/LAGGING) ON...
NOTE: If lagging with latency tweak builds, use the no latency tweak builds.
- Works on Every Rom
Change Log
Code:
4/27
- ALL BY KIFNO!!!!!!!
- Documentation for my opinion of what all my tweaks/scripts do. (I say opinion because I may or may not be correct for all of my explanations. If I am wrong please let me know, so that I can correct it so that others will not learn false information).
- setCPU, collin_ph, overclockwidget, CM7's cpu settings, or any other battery tweak/cpu overclocking utility, REPLACEMENT. This is not to be used with any of those utilities while using this or you will encounter many problems.
- mobile network and wifi speed boost ranging anywhere from 175%-400% speed gains. The percentage amount increased is determined by many other factors (the data tower in your area, your phones condition, the wifi connection, etc)
- Smoother UI
- More Free RAM
- Memory Settings Optimizer
- Any kernel tweak-er
- DroidX Market Tweak COMING SOON
- GPU Composition instead of MDP Composition
- Extended Battery Life and/or Increased Performance as a result of the tweaks and my battery tweak/cpu overclocking utility replacement script
- Tweaked the I/O
5/2
- removed some junk
- made network speeds a bit more stable
- fixed the problem were my 98kiftweaks wasn't writing the values correctly (sd card cache fix improvement & io tweaks)
- adjustments to kifCPU so that there will be longer battery life :D
- added a removal and backup script
Donations
I want everyone who is has ever donated, or has thought of donating me or anyone else to know this. XDA is a place for everyone to learn, teach, and share their work and new findings for android. Donations are not a right on XDA they are a privilege. Donations were allowed for XDA members to give and receive as a way for someone who really appreciates the original poster's work and is a way for the donor to show their thanks by doing more than pressing the thanks button. This is something that the original poster should appreciate and follow up with a PM as a thanks for their thanks, and use that as a notification, that they should keep up the good work and they're doing good things for XDA. Again recieving donations is not a right it is a privilege, that the original poster shouldn't abuse by asking for donations but instead appreciate when recieved. Asking for donations is not right and it is looked down upon on XDA because it goes against the meaning of what XDA is all about. This is something I want everyone to understand before even thinking of donating to me or anyone else or when given a donation. Don't donate because the original poster comes off as asking for money, instead if you choose to donate, donate out of showing more appreciation for another's work and as more of a way to show that you care for their work. I want everyone to understand that.
- Kifno
Credits:
unCoRrUpTeD
Made base of the script when he converted the v0.9 build.prop edits in to a script.
brainmaster
SD Card cache IDEA. I improved it.
farmatito
IDEA for I/O scheduler tweaks. I improved them for our heroes.
montalbert
MOST of the network tweaks. I just changed the values so that it'd be optimal for our heroes.
FloHimself
Screen state IDEA for kifCPU
​

Okay gonna take it for a spin and see how it works. But I have a??? Does this mod preset the max/min cpu speed??? I use jm's kernel @ 710 max 691 min. But at work or when I'm in an area that has poor reception I bump it up to 768min 806 max. Am I able to still do this and use this tweak effectively??? Also does the removal zip from your prior tweak remove this?? Also to use the battery tweaks must I do the whole calibrate thing??? The reason I ask is I use the gf's data2ext mod and letting the battery discharge is a no go.
#Root/Hack-Mod_Always*

laie1472 said:
Okay gonna take it for a spin and see how it works. But I have a??? Does this mod preset the max/min cpu speed??? I use jm's kernel @ 710 max 691 min. But at work or when I'm in an area that has poor reception I bump it up to 768min 806 max. Am I able to still do this and use this tweak effectively??? Also does the removal zip from your prior tweak remove this?? Also to use the battery tweaks must I do the whole calibrate thing??? The reason I ask is I use the gf's data2ext mod and letting the battery discharge is a no go.
#Root/Hack-Mod_Always*
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No it doesn't remove this I need to make a removal .zip asap. But You can just take the 768mhz zip and upzip it and change the cpu values in the /system/bin/kifCPU.sh file
just look for the the lines that effect the cpu speeds. If you don't know which ones do, then read my explanation for my tweaks
OH YEAH EVERYONE I ADDED MY EXPLANATION FOR TWEAKS If I am wrong about anything please, tell me asap so I can update it so people don't learn false information.
Glad to be on a fresh start with this

I'm gonna be all over this. Haha.

Please post feedback as to hours of battery life increase based on your normal usage and which build worked for you rom. Please post your rom and kernel you're using as well. and any other things you'd like for me to know as well. Thanks

flashing on aospCmod now (right after this nandroid finishes)

Haha. Outstanding!
Rom: CyanogenMod 7.0.2
Kif's Universal Script: Latency 768
Kernel: Sobe's AP5
Battery: Will post feed back when I get off work.
Network speed: Outstanding on my phone!
Keyboard response: before kid's tweak, laggy After kif's tweak, VERY! responsive.
UI: Speedy!
Haha. Feels like I just bought a new phone.
I can't wait to test this out on Rock Steady when I get home! Honestly I flash this on work hours. Ha. Yea I'm a flash freak like everyone else. I should just say I'm sick *cough cough* ha.
Outstanding work bro!
Will post more feedbacks when I get home.
Take care and God Bless.

I'm using one of Zen's kernels (710MHz)on NfiniteFX ROM. Can I use this? I'm not sure Zen's kernels have the governors you mention. Where can I get such a kernel, remembering that I am running Sense. I've read Zen kernels are usually best for Sense.
Thanks!

so far so good installed fine
downloads 35-50% faster on average on a few trials via 3g.

In regard to your explanation:
Code:
/sys/block/mmcblk1/queue/nr_requests
As stated previously in the old thread, this file has never and will never exist on the hero, because we only have one SD device.
This DNS server [0.0.0.0] was better than
google's or opendns (but I've always had problems with opendns)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
0.0.0.0 is NOT a DNS. All this value does is force the phone to use whichever DNS the network specifies (which it may or may not be doing anyway).
Code:
ro.ril.hsxpa=2
ro.ril.gprsclass=8
ro.ril.hep=1
ro.ril.enable.dtm=1
ro.ril.hsdpa.category=24
ro.ril.enable.a53=1
ro.ril.enable.3g.prefix=1
ro.ril.htcmaskw1.bitmask=4294967295
ro.ril.htcmaskw1=14449
ro.ril.hsupa.category=3
You said to "ask someone in the networking field" about these values. Someone from the "networking field" (dhero) already chimed in (as did several other people) and told you that some of these lines don't even do anything. The only thing here that's probably making a difference in network speeds is the bitmask value (which is just setting all bits to 1, negating what they actually do).
For instance, I can tell you 100%, for a fact, that the "ro.ril.enable.dtm" line does nothing on the hero, because the entire point of this line is to enable simultaneous use of voice/data on GSM networks. CDMA networks have never been able to do this, and that's not something you can change
The line "ro.ril.enable.a53" also does absolutely nothing on our phones. A5/3 is an encryption algorithm, used on GSM networks. It has no use in CDMA devices, and was actually broken by hackers in recent history.
I've love to see some real documentation of how setting these values really makes a difference. The facts of speed tests are that (1) they are only testing your "burst" speeds which means they don't really answer many questions about long-term performance and that (2) they can vary wildly in the same time frame. I know that I have personally always had better EV-DO speeds than your scripts supposedly provide (sustained average 1.5-2mb/s downstream), and that all depends on signal range and nearby devices.
Right now I'm working on actually reverse-engineering the HTC RIL library to see what these values REALLY change. As far as I can tell, some of them never actually make a difference on the CDMA Hero and are just left over from the GSM Hero and other devices. They are read in from the prop file, but the variables which contain them aren't referenced by the CDMA code paths.
Code:
windowsmgr.max_events_per_sec=60
As stated previously in the old thread, this value does nothing because that's already the default value in the source code.
Code:
keyguard.no_require_sim=true
As stated previously in the old thread, this is already set in the build props.
Code:
debug.sf.hw=1
As stated previously in the old thread (and backed up by PROVIDING THE SOURCE CODE), this line does nothing because it's the equivalent of not specifying it at all. This is why we removed it from the CM build a LONG time ago. The ONLY time this line would EVER make a difference is if someone had deliberately set it to 0 beforehand, and as far as I know, no ROM (including the stock one) has ever shipped with 0 set.
The DEFAULT behavior of SurfaceFlinger is to always use the GPU when possible. The ONLY reason the "debug.sf.hw" line exists is for troubleshooting/debugging, for example when booting the emulator.
------------------------------------------
In regard to my own exploration of the zips provided (for reference I used the no-latency 691 zip):
You have a typo in your code.
Code:
CHECK_NOOP=` cat /sys/block/mtdblock3/queue/scheduler
The tailing backtick is missing.
Why are you providing busybox in your zip? The version you provide (1.15) is outdated; a newer version is already in CM7 and other ROM images. And the folder you're copying it to (system/sbin) doesn't actually exist.
By overwriting the init.local.rc script instead of appending your code to it, you are effectively breaking compcache in CM.
Your CPU profiles contain multiple infinite loops. This is bad practice. Your loops don't contain ANY sleep calls as far as I can tell, which means they run indefinitely, sucking up CPU cycles and battery. Your script should be sleeping on an interval.
The functions called by your infinite loop themselves contain infinite loops, which means that (as far as I can tell) they will never return and charging source changes will never be detected. Am I reading this wrong? Does this really work?

Blah blah blah..
Your scripts are working fine on my phone and others even though you've missed a few things here and there. The main thing is that your trying and trying leads to something even better. Looking forward to seeing v2.x and further.

I feel like I am on a creepy merry-go-round.....
Yet again kifno, when you could be an asset to the community simply by giving proper credits originally and saying that you used others work and made it better, you take all or most of the credit for yourself. If you want to help the community, do so by following the rules and common sense. FYI you cant "improve" brainmasters sd tweak because ALL it does is change the read_ahead_kb in sys/devices/virtual/bdi/179:0/read_ahead_kb. Now here's some links that users/mods/kifno would do well to pay attention to the dates of, these are also the only ones that I personally have reviewed recently, I would bet there are more:
http://andrs.w3pla.net/autokiller/kernel
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=813309
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=11496754
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=991276
Quite obviously this is not kifno's "original" work or ideas, or even code. After all it was recently noted in here that there is code for GSM devices. Why would that be in a script for a CDMA phone, unless of course the code was kanged. I just wish that if work was to be shared, it ought to be done so properly and not with this "MY WORK THIS TIME I SWEAR SILLY" bull.
I sent kifno a PM earlier tonight about this VERY thread when the OP only had credited uncorrupted. I told him to fix the lies about "all mine" and he did somewhat, but not fully as you all can see. My point is that this kind of action on my part SHOULD be unnecessary, but it seems to continue to be in ALL the threads kifno makes. Users, I know lots of this works but that's not the point. It is taken, and unabashedly handed out as original work, which it is not. That is why I continue to post relevant info when it it obvious. It is NOT to incite war, only to pay respect to the actual devs who created these works, which kifno does not seem to want to do.
I'm Pretty sure that the definition of kanging is taking others work without askance or credit - which is what this is. It's actually OK and encouraged to use others work in this community, that way we all get better tweaks and a better knowledge and a better user experience. BUT this is only OK if done following forum rules - which stem from mutual respect and community enrichment.
I am convinced the response will be "BUT BUT I DIDN'T COPY, I MADE THESE MYSELF", to which my response would be "yeah right".
Have a beautiful night/day ladies and gents. I have said my piece...

Let's try to stick to constructive criticism and not resort to personal attacks. It's killing the forum.

il Duce said:
I feel like I am on a creepy merry-go-round.....
Yet again kifno, when you could be an asset to the community simply by giving proper credits originally and saying that you used others work and made it better, you take all or most of the credit for yourself. If you want to help the community, do so by following the rules and common sense. FYI you cant "improve" brainmasters sd tweak because ALL it does is change the read_ahead_kb in sys/devices/virtual/bdi/179:0/read_ahead_kb. Now here's some links that users/mods/kifno would do well to pay attention to the dates of, these are also the only ones that I personally have reviewed recently, I would bet there are more:
http://andrs.w3pla.net/autokiller/kernel
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=813309
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=11496754
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=991276
Quite obviously this is not kifno's "original" work or ideas, or even code. After all it was recently noted in here that there is code for GSM devices. Why would that be in a script for a CDMA phone, unless of course the code was kanged. I just wish that if work was to be shared, it ought to be done so properly and not with this "MY WORK THIS TIME I SWEAR SILLY" bull.
I sent kifno a PM earlier tonight about this VERY thread when the OP only had credited uncorrupted. I told him to fix the lies about "all mine" and he did somewhat, but not fully as you all can see. My point is that this kind of action on my part SHOULD be unnecessary, but it seems to continue to be in ALL the threads kifno makes. Users, I know lots of this works but that's not the point. It is taken, and unabashedly handed out as original work, which it is not. That is why I continue to post relevant info when it it obvious. It is NOT to incite war, only to pay respect to the actual devs who created these works, which kifno does not seem to want to do.
I'm Pretty sure that the definition of kanging is taking others work without askance or credit - which is what this is. It's actually OK and encouraged to use others work in this community, that way we all get better tweaks and a better knowledge and a better user experience. BUT this is only OK if done following forum rules - which stem from mutual respect and community enrichment.
I am convinced the response will be "BUT BUT I DIDN'T COPY, I MADE THESE MYSELF", to which my response would be "yeah right".
Have a beautiful night/day ladies and gents. I have said my piece...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
After reading this, i agree with u. Kifno should credit more people for most of the things on here. All he did was compile it all together. Am i saying that right?

Ok flash on the sense rom didn't really do so well phone froze 3 times on the market took battery out then froze on whit HTC screen so I tried it cm7.2 and works like a charm
Sent from my HERO200 using XDA App

kifno said:
No it doesn't remove this I need to make a removal .zip asap. But You can just take the 768mhz zip and upzip it and change the cpu values in the /system/bin/kifCPU.sh file
just look for the the lines that effect the cpu speeds. If you don't know which ones do, then read my explanation for my tweaks
OH YEAH EVERYONE I ADDED MY EXPLANATION FOR TWEAKS If I am wrong about anything please, tell me asap so I can update it so people don't learn false information.
Glad to be on a fresh start with this
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Humm well didn't really wanna go that far into your script. Is there anyway if you have some time free you could possibly edit the 768 scripts for me and post or send them threw pm??? I wouldn't mine running your mods and posting feed back I just don't want to change my daily kernel. Ill hold off on flashing this untill I hear from you. Thanks.
#Root/Hack-Mod_Always*

bravo1565 said:
Ok flash on the sense rom didn't really do so well phone froze 3 times on the market took battery out then froze on whit HTC screen so I tried it cm7.2 and works like a charm
Sent from my HERO200 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do you use kifnos sense rom or espresso? I flashed the latency 768 tweak on his espresso 2.1 rom and everythings running flawlessly. I flashed the tweak on a full battery so I'll be back when the phone dies to report my battery life and performance.

jasonmaloney said:
In regard to your explanation:
Code:
/sys/block/mmcblk1/queue/nr_requests
As stated previously in the old thread, this file has never and will never exist on the hero, because we only have one SD device.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So we don't have the the mmcblck1 partition? Hmp I know what I'll do to fix m y nr_request tweak then I'll add it to the loop that checks for all values in the mmc* blocks Checked it and it already is I need to edit my reasons for the tweaks lol. So no worries this value is only changed in all mmc blocks that exsist.
jasonmaloney said:
0.0.0.0 is NOT a DNS. All this value does is force the phone to use whichever DNS the network specifies (which it may or may not be doing anyway).
Code:
ro.ril.hsxpa=2
ro.ril.gprsclass=8
ro.ril.hep=1
ro.ril.enable.dtm=1
ro.ril.hsdpa.category=24
ro.ril.enable.a53=1
ro.ril.enable.3g.prefix=1
ro.ril.htcmaskw1.bitmask=4294967295
ro.ril.htcmaskw1=14449
ro.ril.hsupa.category=3
You said to "ask someone in the networking field" about these values. Someone from the "networking field" (dhero) already chimed in (as did several other people) and told you that some of these lines don't even do anything. The only thing here that's probably making a difference in network speeds is the bitmask value (which is just setting all bits to 1, negating what they actually do).
For instance, I can tell you 100%, for a fact, that the "ro.ril.enable.dtm" line does nothing on the hero, because the entire point of this line is to enable simultaneous use of voice/data on GSM networks. CDMA networks have never been able to do this, and that's not something you can change.
The line "ro.ril.enable.a53" also does absolutely nothing on our phones. A5/3 is an encryption algorithm, used on GSM networks. It has no use in CDMA devices, and was actually broken by hackers in recent history.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh wee thanks jason The lines you said to remove, and a few more lines have been removed from the network tweak, for next release, because only a few are making the real difference which I have tested.
jasonmaloney said:
I've love to see some real documentation of how setting these values really makes a difference. The facts of speed tests are that (1) they are only testing your "burst" speeds which means they don't really answer many questions about long-term performance and that (2) they can vary wildly in the same time frame. I know that I have personally always had better EV-DO speeds than your scripts supposedly provide (sustained average 1.5-2mb/s downstream), and that all depends on signal range and nearby devices.
Right now I'm working on actually reverse-engineering the HTC RIL library to see what these values REALLY change. As far as I can tell, some of them never actually make a difference on the CDMA Hero and are just left over from the GSM Hero and other devices. They are read in from the prop file, but the variables which contain them aren't referenced by the CDMA code paths.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you could figure out exactly what they change (as far as I know its just general speed) that would be better for the first post's explanation of them. I'm going based of the fact that when I changed a few of the strings values, it slowed the network down, and certain values speed it up.
jasonmaloney said:
Code:
windowsmgr.max_events_per_sec=60
As stated previously in the old thread, this value does nothing because that's already the default value in the source code.
Code:
keyguard.no_require_sim=true
As stated previously in the old thread, this is already set in the build props.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Both removed already last night
jasonmaloney said:
Code:
debug.sf.hw=1
As stated previously in the old thread (and backed up by PROVIDING THE SOURCE CODE), this line does nothing because it's the equivalent of not specifying it at all. This is why we removed it from the CM build a LONG time ago. The ONLY time this line would EVER make a difference is if someone had deliberately set it to 0 beforehand, and as far as I know, no ROM (including the stock one) has ever shipped with 0 set.
The DEFAULT behavior of SurfaceFlinger is to always use the GPU when possible. The ONLY reason the "debug.sf.hw" line exists is for troubleshooting/debugging, for example when booting the emulator.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is one that wasn't removed last night but will be I didn't know that it wasn't set to 0 because it wasn't specified in any roms I looked at. Thanks for that info
jasonmaloney said:
In regard to my own exploration of the zips provided (for reference I used the no-latency 691 zip):
You have a typo in your code.
Code:
CHECK_NOOP=` cat /sys/block/mtdblock3/queue/scheduler
The tailing backtick is missing.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I hate making those minor mistakes thanks for catching that jason
jasonmaloney said:
Why are you providing busybox in your zip? The version you provide (1.15) is outdated; a newer version is already in CM7 and other ROM images. And the folder you're copying it to (system/sbin) doesn't actually exist.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
From what uncorrupted told me, in a way it is better than the busybox in most roms. I'll ask him about it, but until he provides reasons why, I'll remove it.
jasonmaloney said:
By overwriting the init.local.rc script instead of appending your code to it, you are effectively breaking compcache in CM.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Saw that myself when I looked at CM7's init.local.rc. It breaks that and any other service set in the init.local.rc. WHICH IS NOT GOOD.
jasonmaloney said:
Your CPU profiles contain multiple infinite loops. This is bad practice. Your loops don't contain ANY sleep calls as far as I can tell, which means they run indefinitely, sucking up CPU cycles and battery. Your script should be sleeping on an interval.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'll have it sleep every second or so because I doubt anyone is running their phone straight for hours and hours without letting it sleep. So adding a sleep interval will help with the should help with the battery life portion of this tweak as well
I had a sleep interval back in the v1.x series which helped the battery life, in my other infinite scripts, I need to add that again
jasonmaloney said:
The functions called by your infinite loop themselves contain infinite loops, which means that (as far as I can tell) they will never return and charging source changes will never be detected. Am I reading this wrong? Does this really work?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh yes Do you know what a until loop is? It basically saying the temperature drops it will cap the cpu speed. Once the temperature isn't high anymore then it uncaps the cpu speed again So this is to keep your phone from getting too hot, I know my phone does Also since the cpu is being capped this would result in the battery temperature going down and therefore once the temp is lowered it returns to the battery charging source changes. So yes it does work

il Duce said:
I feel like I am on a creepy merry-go-round.....
Yet again kifno, when you could be an asset to the community simply by giving proper credits originally and saying that you used others work and made it better, you take all or most of the credit for yourself. If you want to help the community, do so by following the rules and common sense. FYI you cant "improve" brainmasters sd tweak because ALL it does is change the read_ahead_kb in sys/devices/virtual/bdi/179:0/read_ahead_kb.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I did improve his tweak, so there you are wrong sir. I will be sending him a message about if he changed the value for all the bdi's sub-directories read_ahead_kb he would in fact improve his sd tweak. He sets it for just the 179:0 but when I changed it to set it for changing all the bdi's sub-directories read_ahead_kb my sd card performance was much better, than just his tweak which just made it better.
il Duce said:
Now here's some links that users/mods/kifno would do well to pay attention to the dates of, these are also the only ones that I personally have reviewed recently, I would bet there are more:
http://andrs.w3pla.net/autokiller/kernel
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=813309
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=11496754
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=991276
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The one's who I ORIGIANALLY got the ideas from are credited. Anyone who is not credited I did not get any ideas from. If a person isn't allowed to use their knowledge of linux operating system's files and how they tweak linux and use them on android then that just isn't right. I've been on linux for years and you're saying that the tweaks I used for my linux system I can't change the values and use on the heroc, come on now. That isn't fair.
il Duce said:
Quite obviously this is not kifno's "original" work or ideas, or even code. After all it was recently noted in here that there is code for GSM devices. Why would that be in a script for a CDMA phone, unless of course the code was kanged. I just wish that if work was to be shared, it ought to be done so properly and not with this "MY WORK THIS TIME I SWEAR SILLY" bull.
I sent kifno a PM earlier tonight about this VERY thread when the OP only had credited uncorrupted. I told him to fix the lies about "all mine" and he did somewhat, but not fully as you all can see. My point is that this kind of action on my part SHOULD be unnecessary, but it seems to continue to be in ALL the threads kifno makes. Users, I know lots of this works but that's not the point. It is taken, and unabashedly handed out as original work, which it is not. That is why I continue to post relevant info when it it obvious. It is NOT to incite war, only to pay respect to the actual devs who created these works, which kifno does not seem to want to do.
I'm Pretty sure that the definition of kanging is taking others work without askance or credit - which is what this is. It's actually OK and encouraged to use others work in this community, that way we all get better tweaks and a better knowledge and a better user experience. BUT this is only OK if done following forum rules - which stem from mutual respect and community enrichment.
I am convinced the response will be "BUT BUT I DIDN'T COPY, I MADE THESE MYSELF", to which my response would be "yeah right".
Have a beautiful night/day ladies and gents. I have said my piece...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The response you are "convinced" will be, is not the response I am giving you. The people whose ideas I were using and made better were back from the 0.x series (which is long ago). Also as for the code not even being mine? THE MAJORITY OF IT IS MINE. I used the screen state idea and built off of it to make a full out, cpu/batter tweak utility replacement. My next step is to make a menu for the users to change those values themselves. The users whose ideas I have used AND IMPROVED ON, have been credited as we talked about, I just had to backtrack who I really got the ideas from and not others who used their ideas as well as myself. Everything else I have done, and came up with myself. Believe it or not. Use linux for a few years on a sucky laptop and I bet you'll be wanted to tweak it, too. Which is how I learned so much about linux's files, which I quickly found android to be almost like a "portable linux" operating system One of the reasons I got the phone. Have a beautiful day ladies and gents
"kif'd"
- Kifno

XGodOfModzX said:
After reading this, i agree with u. Kifno should credit more people for most of the things on here. All he did was compile it all together. Am i saying that right?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Read my post, i used IDEAS and made them better. The one thing I did use and compile into the tweak was the network build.prop tweaks. Which some of the strings do nothing. Be on the look out for v2.0.1 also the credits that are there now are for v2.0.1 which will be released tonight. Minor changes made but they're for the better.

[MOD][TWEAKS] Seeder (For lag reduction and performance boost)

Again since Sensation XE doesn't have people promoting seeder too much, I brought it here for those who are not familiar with this.
Please don't post negative things here. I only understand theory of this mod that's all. And I held no credit to any of the content.
Requirements:
1. S-Off
2. Custom recovery
3. Rooted
4. Init.d Support for flashable version
CREDITS FIRST:
lambgx02 (for the original seeder and APK format) http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1987032
ryuinferno (for flashable version) http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=36479461&postcount=1924
FAQ:
What is seeder?
Its a mod that increases resource in your device so it wont suffer any starvation(lag).
Above is the easiest way to explain it.
What is the difference between APK and Flashable version?
APK version provides more options to tune method it provides resource and the frequency of it.
Flashable version will be automated in your device as long as your device have init.d support.
How can you prove it significantly improves performance?
Well I can't really tell, Dev's in sensation department is extremely good all ROM's are well tweaked. Its good enough without it, but IMHO it will be better with it.
To .zip version user only
Once you flashed it. Go to terminal emulator. Enter
su
seeder
A menu will show up. It will indicate if seeder is working in your device or not.
Thank the developers of this awesome invention, then Thank me if you think its good for me to bring it here.
Cheers!
TIP: Try on those high load games, the loading speed improvements are the best ways I can see after using this.

good
downloaded the app using the QR code and never installed. wheb you select it tin the task bar it doesnt go into the instalation menu. however when i went to the downloads in my phone it opened the installer. it tried too install but took a very long time. but in the end worked thansk made a slight difference to the lag on my phone. :good:
HTC sensation 4G
ROM: CM 10.1-20130212-albinoman887-pyramid

Although this improves performance slightly, the only thing it really does is run your CPU at a higher frequency. This'll cost precious battery life.

ridder215215 said:
Although this improves performance slightly, the only thing it really does is run your CPU at a higher frequency. This'll cost precious battery life.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can't say you're wrong at the battery life part. But IMHO, it doesn't actually touches the frequency part. Frequency is something that runs instructions, but this thing provides additional resource aka fuel for your device. It don't make your engine combust quicker, it will only make your engine combust cleaner, and more fuel that's all.

KiD3991 said:
Can't say you're wrong at the battery life part. But IMHO, it doesn't actually touches the frequency part. Frequency is something that runs instructions, but this thing provides additional resource aka fuel for your device. It don't make your engine combust quicker, it will only make your engine combust cleaner, and more fuel that's all.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm just going to leave this quote from a CM maintainer here:
“IMNSHO the recent entropy pool fad is bull***. The only users of /dev/random are libcrypto (used for cryptographic operations like SSL connections, ssh key generation, and so on), wpa_supplicant/hostapd (to generate WEP/WPA keys while in AP mode), and the libraries that generate random partition IDs when you do an ext2/3/4 format. None of those 3 users are in the path of app execution, so feeding random from urandom does nothing except make random… well… less random.
The only conceivable reason some devices may feel faster is because by constantly polling the PRNG, it keeps the device’s I/O in constant use (which in turn, depending on device, will make the CPU stick to higher clock frequencies to keep up and/or ramp up the IO scheduler).”
Source
Don't get me wrong, if it seems to help for you, that's great. But I'm not going to use it.

ridder215215 said:
I'm just going to leave this quote from a CM maintainer here:
“IMNSHO the recent entropy pool fad is bull***. The only users of /dev/random are libcrypto (used for cryptographic operations like SSL connections, ssh key generation, and so on), wpa_supplicant/hostapd (to generate WEP/WPA keys while in AP mode), and the libraries that generate random partition IDs when you do an ext2/3/4 format. None of those 3 users are in the path of app execution, so feeding random from urandom does nothing except make random… well… less random.
The only conceivable reason some devices may feel faster is because by constantly polling the PRNG, it keeps the device’s I/O in constant use (which in turn, depending on device, will make the CPU stick to higher clock frequencies to keep up and/or ramp up the IO scheduler).”
Source
Don't get me wrong, if it seems to help for you, that's great. But I'm not going to use it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I promoted this because it seemed great on my previous device. But in sensation the effect is much lesser than anticipated. Works in my friend's S2 though. Maybe its for low end devices only tsk tsk tsk.
But still, no harm experimenting on everything.

KiD3991 said:
I promoted this because it seemed great on my previous device. But in sensation the effect is much lesser than anticipated. Works in my friend's S2 though. Maybe its for low end devices only tsk tsk tsk.
But still, no harm experimenting on everything.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Seeder was designed for older versions of android. It is stated in the thread that it is solved in newer versions of android.

[DEV][APP] waut.ch! - Calibration for Android - version 145

Utility for background calibration, curation and tuning of the device towards an intuitive interface.
Subsystems being battery, entropy, encryption, disk, cpu, memory, filesystem, ui, scheduler, and network, all safe and open source technology.
Presented in this educational gaming metric format with infinite feedback and an interestingly assymetric chance. scribble anywhere, check in some stress, or find the 8!
waut.ch! does one hope to receive from this?
Well, increasing degrees and amounts of a certain "Je ne sais quoi" or responsiveness from the user interface for a start. Better battery life perhaps. Better quality of life, maybe.
And waut.ch! can only perhaps be described as "A qualified quantification of the placebo effect"
waut.ch! might benefit from this?
In the Android device space:
Designers
Users
Manufacturers
Recyclers
Developers
Compilers
Support personnel
OEMs
The Friendly Neighborhood Nerd/Technician.
“Make the most of yourself....for waut.ch! is all there is of you.” - Ralph Waldo Emerson ( paraphrase )
All along the waut.ch! tower - Bob Dylan
waut.ch! - Sometimes used in some colloquium as "watch!", keen upon reducing the TDP of mobile devices to 1.0 watt!
ARM variants of Android only Donut 1.6+
Please uninstall either Seeder or CrossBreeder prior to using this.
Root recommended, else reactivity metric is interesting and introduces uniqueness into the entropy pool anyway. Metric may demonstrate a certain asymmetry that is expected from predictable human actions. Efforts have been made to remove time seed logic from haveged in order to improve upon encryption and system-wide performance and security.
Also numerous other subsystems require careful calibration to facilitate this process.
Rewritten code, subset of functionality for upstream project - CrossBreeder ( https://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2113150 )
Please feel free to view and analyze source and functionality and report bugs and discuss etc on the XDA forum:
( https://forum.xda-developers.com/android/apps-games/app-waut-ch-calibration-android-t3549967 )
Google Play store:
( https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=ch.waut )
Please visit: /data/data/ch.waut/files/bin on the device itself for partial shell source code and XDA Downloads section and Github for full source code.
Reboot at convenience liberally or sparingly to reseed the entropy pool or as is known in common parlance, for good luck!
Thanks.
Havged source code:
https://github.com/Openand-I/haveged
Adhoc Payment URL to support development efforts : https://paypal.me/openand/10
Frappe ( "free-paid" ) same-version to support development efforts : http://waut.ch
Custom haveged source code as used in this piece of software: https://github.com/Openand-I/haveged
=====
Version Name: 59a6333e-9ed9-43f8-8dad-51ed46c17e28
cb.sh: cache pressure - 500
cb_io.sh: read_ahead - 0
cb_io.sh: nr_requests - 0
$ md5sum *.apk
661c30b02b2321300624af98feaa5bad *145-waut.ch.apk
661c30b02b2321300624af98feaa5bad *oi.apk
$ sha256sum *.apk
6d23b8da87dc5516583a55a3203c9f5068ea8fe8765ece489080ef663c8aee15 *145-waut.ch.apk
6d23b8da87dc5516583a55a3203c9f5068ea8fe8765ece489080ef663c8aee15 *oi.apk
https://github.com/Openand-I/haveged
https://github.com/openand-inc/waut.ch
https://forum.xda-developers.com/devdb/project/?id=19218#downloads
https://forum.xda-developers.com/android/general/app-waut-ch-calibration-android-version-t3858365
https://github.com/openand-inc/waut.ch/raw/cb0c60025f86a4fdc4778506e97ee80eb1c00b45/oi.apk
https://github.com/openand-inc/waut.ch/raw/master/145-waut.ch.apk
-------------------------
Recommended:
- ntp: automatic system time update from internet is enabled.
please check the clock and fiddle around with the timezone settings in case of any issues. one may need to set the timezone manually.
then simply run the app to initiate a time sync
the network time sync happens at around 3am. so the time to check is in the morning.
- Please disable mount namespace separation in the superuser app to take advantage of the mount optimisations.
- Reboot once and occasionally to reseed the entropy pool. It's good luck!
- Do ensure that the waut.ch service has started upon reboot. Just run if it doesn't start it automatically!
Note: Please note that the haveged binary in the APK is a static binary and works on both PIE and non-PIE environments. It is also UPX compressed. UPX for Android didn't compile. So UPX for linux was used to compress the executable file. It is an elegant solution as both on disk and in memory space(?) is reduced by 70% per executable. One is welcome to decompress the file using 'upx -d'.
Full source code is provided on Github and build scripts are attached here and on Github.
There is no license required to both install the app or distribute it, both within the developer ROM community or in commercial form. Adhoc payment URL to support development - https://www.paypal.me/openand/10
Again do note that the license to use the APP and source code is free worldwide and irrevocable in full or partial form. All other open source components simply inherit their license. But under no circumstances is any use thereof legally binding or relevant.
--------
Utility for background calibration, curation and tuning of the device towards an intuitive interface.
Subsystems being battery, entropy, encryption, disk, cpu, memory, filesystem, ui, scheduler, and network, all safe and open source technology.
Presented in this metric format with infinite feedback and an interestingly assymetric chance. scribble anywhere, check in some stress, or get lucky for that matter!
-----
ARM variants of Android only Donut 1.6+ ( should even be compatible with the latest ARM Android 9+ )
Please uninstall either Seeder or CrossBreeder prior to using this. And other "mods" or "tweaks".
Root recommended, else reactivity metric is interesting and introduces uniqueness into the entropy pool anyway. Metric may demonstrate a certain asymmetry that is expected from predictable human actions. Efforts have been made to remove time seed logic from haveged in order to improve upon encryption and system-wide performance and security.
Also numerous other subsystems require careful calibration to facilitate this process.
Rewritten code, subset of functionality for upstream project - CrossBreeder ( https://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2113150 )
Please feel free to view and analyze source and functionality and report bugs and discuss etc on the XDA forum:
( https://forum.xda-developers.com/android/apps-games/app-waut-ch-calibration-android-version-t3858365 )
Google Play store:
( https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=ch.waut )
Please visit: /data/data/ch.waut/files/bin on the device itself for partial shell source code and XDA Downloads section and Github for full source code.
The app will amongst other maintenance tasks tune sqlite databases regularly and reseed the entropy pool or as is known in common parlance, for good luck!
Thanks.
Payment URL: https://paypal.me/openand/10
XDAevDB Information
waut.ch!, App for all devices (see above for details)
Contributors
idcrisis
Source Code:
[url]https://github.com/Openand-I/haveged[/URL]
[url]https://github.com/openand-inc/waut.ch[/URL]
[url]https://forum.xda-developers.com/devdb/project/?id=19218#downloads[/URL]
Previous Version Information - 144
305bd30f-0c8a-40d8-baf5-330c68f62d51
Status: Stable
Created 2017-01-01
Last Updated 2020-08-18
$ md5sum *.apk
8ea8e8c132a584767a12e394f7975654 *144-waut.ch.apk
8ea8e8c132a584767a12e394f7975654 *oi.apk
$ sha256sum *.apk
4925066a106c83b18ac6e563f03331c56b72777e66973db591c9776d706595e3 *144-waut.ch.apk
4925066a106c83b18ac6e563f03331c56b72777e66973db591c9776d706595e3 *oi.apk
https://github.com/Openand-I/haveged
https://github.com/openand-inc/waut.ch
https://github.com/openand-inc/waut.ch/raw/master/144-waut.ch.apk
https://github.com/openand-inc/waut.ch/raw/f699d3763507ec1f91d82b9ce25c53036b460a9e/oi.apk
-----
Version notes:
haveged: static non upx binary used
cb.sh: lock fixes
Recommended:
- ntp: automatic system time update from internet is enabled.
please check the clock and fiddle around with the timezone settings in case of any issues. one may need to set the timezone manually.
then simply run the app to initiate a time sync
the network time sync happens at around 3am. so the time to check is in the morning.
- Please disable mount namespace separation in the superuser app to take advantage of the mount optimisations.
- Reboot once and occasionally to reseed the entropy pool. It's good luck!
- Do ensure that the waut.ch service has started upon reboot. Just run if it doesn't start it automatically!
Please support development, simply use https://paypal.me/openand/10 or the payment URL.
Or you can simply buy the "frappe" ( free-paid ) version of the app: http://waut.ch

Recommended:
- ntp: automatic system time update from internet is enabled.
please check the clock and fiddle around with the timezone settings in case of any issues. one may need to set the timezone manually.
the network time sync happens at around 3am. so the time to check is in the morning.
- Please disable mount namespace separation in the superuser app to take advantage of the mount optimisations.
- Reboot once and occasionally to reseed the entropy pool. It's good luck!
- Do ensure that the waut.ch service has started upon reboot. Just run if it doesn't start it automatically!

Issues:
- superuser - Please disable mount namespace separation in the superuser app ( for optional but recommended mount options ). Also please revisit the app entry inside the superuser app to ensure the waut.ch service can run on boot unattended. One can see the logs on another day to ensure that the scheduler ran correctly in the night.
- Non root users - User Interface can help in clearing the random device. Please try and obtain root to avail of most features
- Some Samsung users - One is also requested to raise a ticket with Samsung who may be running old PE detection rules that flag any compressed EXE.
- x64 users - Reports are that the binaries run on 64 bit as they are static! Please compile one's variant of the binary if required. Entropy generations removes CPU jitter and hence runs cooler and more secure.
- Intel users - User Interface can help in clearing the random device. Please compile one's variant of the binary if required. Entropy generations removes CPU jitter and hence runs cooler and more secure.
- Maintenance scheduler VACCUUMS and INDEXES "ALL" SQLITE databases. Some folks may not like that. But given that they're no WAL mode anyway, it's a bottleneck worth removing safely.
- There is a concerned effort to state that 32-bit ARM Android Go/One < 1 GB RAM devices are all that's required for long term functioning. Higher no issues.
- Please try and use a heap size of 96MB. Attempts have been made to set heap size dynamic but ideally this should be done in the build.
- Please clear cache or factory reset upon issues to gain at least another year of MTTR ( Mean Time To Recovery ) for each device.
Thank you!

License
License concerns:
haveged - inherited - https://github.com/Openand-I/haveged
busybox - inherited - https://github.com/openand-inc/busybox
- Busybox simple extract, possibly edit the .config file in 'vi' and type 'make'
The requisite tools are installed using:
apt-get install gcc-arm-linux-gnueabi
apt-get install libncurses5-dev
apt-get install gawk
The following is a step in another direction as the 'make' command works perfectly after extraction, but this is provided for posterity:
wget http://busybox.net/downloads/busybox-1.24.1.tar.bz2
tar -xjf busybox-1.24.1.tar.bz2
cd busybox-1.24.1/
make ARCH=arm CROSS_COMPILE=arm-linux-gnueabi- defconfig
make ARCH=arm CROSS_COMPILE=arm-linux-gnueabi- menuconfig
At the menu, you can configure BusyBox options. Once configured, you can build BusyBox:
make ARCH=arm CROSS_COMPILE=arm-linux-gnueabi-
sqlite3 - inherited - https://github.com/openand-inc/sqlite
waut.ch - 'none', non legally binding, and non legally relevant on a worldwide scale and irrevocable ( derived works are allowed to add their own licenses as long as the import ( meaning ) of the phrase "non legally binding and non legally relevant" is implied throughout ( not required to include text at all )) and does not reflect upon future updates of this software in any manner adversely.

He is back! Welcome back! Looking forward to this great new project! The only thing I might be missing is the dnsmasq filtering, which in my opinion if by far better solution than any kid of firewall/blocker
Sent from my Galaxy Tab 2 3G using Tapatalk

qWantUS said:
He is back! Welcome back! Looking forward to this great new project! The only thing I might be missing is the dnsmasq filtering, which in my opinion if by far better solution than any kid of firewall/blocker
Sent from my Galaxy Tab 2 3G using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Mate!
There are some serious issues with DNSMASQ.
- It crashes on wrong syntax of any option. Cannot do for a server.
- Command line syntax changes between original branch, Android and Cyanogen MOD. Not merged.
- Android fork far behind main branch
- Consumes port 53 on server run without sharing interfaces. This is on the Android branch. Main branch has this resolved.
- CPU loop for most Android DNS versions that show up only upon server run, rather than the tethering run. Possibly hijacked open source branch.
- Tethering modifications to Android branch ( command line addons ) not required any more as the main branch has incorporated methods to dynamically change IP addresses on the fly.
- It is probably encumbered by coding standards and export issues with only one developer. It is emblematic of most such over-reused projects.
- Hash table in memory, therefore future block list will use up RAM. Some others have disk based caching.
- Static blocklists are fairly not scalable for 10 years hence. Needs wildcard blocklists.
- DNS cache poisoning/overloading ( leading to denial of service) possible by any process/app.
It is therefore recommended to use either of:
pdnsd
unbound
djbdns
and standalone dhcp clients and servers from the Entware repository. And also these are interesting:
DANE
DNSSEC over TLS
BTW, all Android is encumbered by simple denial of service attack simply by reading from /dev/random by any app.
In order to try and package this into a simplish product, deleting /dev/random was not implemented.

idcrisis said:
Mate!
There are some serious issues with DNSMASQ.
- It crashes on wrong syntax of any option. Cannot do for a server.
- Command line syntax changes between original branch, Android and Cyanogen MOD. Not merged.
- Android fork far behind main branch
- Consumes port 53 on server run without sharing interfaces. This is on the Android branch. Main branch has this resolved.
- CPU loop for most Android DNS versions that show up only upon server run, rather than the tethering run. Possibly hijacked open source branch.
- Tethering modifications to Android branch ( command line addons ) not required any more as the main branch has incorporated methods to dynamically change IP addresses on the fly.
- It is probably encumbered by coding standards and export issues with only one developer. It is emblematic of most such over-reused projects.
- Hash table in memory, therefore future block list will use up RAM. Some others have disk based caching.
- Static blocklists are fairly not scalable for 10 years hence. Needs wildcard blocklists.
- DNS cache poisoning/overloading ( leading to denial of service) possible by any process/app.
It is therefore recommended to use either of:
pdnsd
unbound
djbdns
and standalone dhcp clients and servers from the Entware repository. And also these are interesting:
DANE
DNSSEC over TLS
BTW, all Android is encumbered by simple denial of service attack simply by reading from /dev/random by any app.
In order to try and package this into a simplish product, deleting /dev/random was not implemented.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Very comprehensive explanation indeed! I am no expert in Linux, only an average user [emoji6]
I was not aware of so many obstacles using dnasmasq, but aware of it's unreliability while using it for blocking stuff in pfsense. But I must say, I had similar experience with unbound, however, probably due to the lack of linux knowledge.
The way I understand is that host blocking is no longer viable due to scales of blocking required today. But sadly there is no alternative for that on android. I have been trying another tool, called sharkmasq but developer sadly abandoned it, while it seems very unfinished and unreliable. I also understand the reasons behind leaving netfiltering out of your development, just, in desperation, I search for the hope [emoji3]
P. S.
Thank you very much for your reply and for your time putting it together. Nevertheless I will look forward to further developments of this new exciting project!
Sent from my LG-D855 using Tapatalk

Uhm, my device seems more responsive even when I use a very low CPU frequency, but is it normal that the app doesn't ask for root permission even if I'm fully rooted? I'm using a Nexus 5 running Nougat. Thank you
Inviato dal mio Nexus 5 con Tapatalk 2

Hi, yes, part of the design criteria. Without root, the metric is interesting. With root, it will automatically start the background processes including the daily cleanups.
Best way to know that the background processes are running is to install Seeder ( but whatever you do don't start it! . Entropy should show around 4096.

Still in the testing phase, does it worth excluding the app from "android optimisation list"? I also use "power nap", not sure will that cause any side effects...
Sent from my LG-D855 using Tapatalk

Let us know If Seeder has RNGD off and still reports ~ 4096 entropy then all is hunky dory.

The new update asked me for root permission, all right here now

Have been busy lately with life, but had occasionally played with phone. So my findings so far: I use this app on my old galaxy tab 2 3g on slim6. Seeder shows entropy being filled in no time at all. Can't really say much about performance, but it seems that it behaves a little smoother. I also use it on my daily LG G3 on stock MM rom with custom kernel, but seeder is reporting very low entropy, if seeded is left on for 1 minute, I can see that entropy never goes above 900? Goes up slowly but then gets used, and then very slowly goes up again and gets used.
Sent from my LG-D855 using Tapatalk

Reboot once after first install kicks in the animation changes. And good luck
New version uploaded with haveged updates. Build scripts also added.
Feedback solicited about the compiler flags etc. Basically the idea is that the ARM v5 binaries should work for all past and future versions of 32-bit Android without modification.
UPX binary could only be compiled for x86 linux.
To answer question, second device, not running, may need to check su logs
Also backend binaries are 32 bit, may not work on 64 bit. GUI's ok.

I am very confused about the frontend of this app that looks like some number game that I really don't understand . Also, I don't understand the description very well. Finding the 8??? Reboot when animation kicks in? What animation?? Nothing seems to happen. I just see a still of a beach with a red number
But something DID happen though, so I am in business. I will keep you curious for a moment, while firstly giving you a good reason for a hard laugh:
I am trying to revive an LG L3 E400! Yep, that's right . Just for fun and educion. In fact I already succeeded quite a bit. I flashed JellyCast V7rev1, used some stuff from V6 SuperCharger (not entropy thingie coz I already intended to use CrossBreeder for that) and 3 scripts from Fly-On Mod. I came here via the CrossBreeder thread (of course). I have already tried CrossBreeder 7.2.13 (I followed advise from @f3tus here, he advised to use that older version). Entropy went up (so it worked) but I did not experience much performance improvement. I did experience more "not responding" issues though. So I reverted to the pre-CrossBreeder backup. And then came your app.....
So that's a very short summary of the many, many, many hours I spent last 2 weeks on this ancient minimalistic but very adorable phone. Now... back to this Waut.ch! app. Presuming that it had done something, I checked the entropy level after first reboot: still a jumpy number between 150 and 200 or so. Despite the fact that the service shows up as running. Then, a lot more playing with the "game" without understanding what I was doing. Just hoping for some wonder. Some message.... just...... something! But nothing. Just a beach with a red number. And a clock. And a questionmark. Or exclamation mark. Pffffff.. So.... let's reboot again. Then eat a sandwich and drink (more) coffee. Then check entropy again. And there it is! Steady at 4089! At first I thought his app was failing because the number didn't change anymore. Just steady. With the old CrossBreeder 7.2.13 I got 4096 a lot but it was a very jumpy number, going even below 1000 a lot. Well, some time passed while writing this post so let's check again: Wow, right now it says 4091 (99%)! One hour later: 4092! (It had spontaneous reboots inbetween).
I am testing it now for a few hours and have these problems:
"Not responding" issues (same as old CrossBreeder).
Spontaneous reboots (3 already). One of them failing to boot at all (stuck at JellyCast logo).
Two times, after a reboot, GPS was disabled. Not consistently though.
No noticable performance gain.
By the way, I am testing like real world usage. Just opening, using and closing apps. I use the same apps all the time so that gives a very good feeling about performance. More meaningful than benchmarks to me. My goal is to make this phone suitable for normal daily usage.
Your app is using a combination of serveral mods, right? I would like to be able to enable / disable each one separately. How can I do that? For example, I have a gut feeling that my "not responding" issues (and reboots?) do not come from the entropy mod but perhaps from governor tweaks or something else. Any chance that you will add enable buttons in the app? Or supply seperate scripts?

Update: I DO have performance gain! Not consitently though. Apps sometimes starting faster than ever. Also still the aforementioned quirks. Last hours no more auto-reboots. Entropy reaching 4096 now, just a little bit wobbly. There seems to be a lot of potential.

The stutter was an issue with the last version.
Do try the latest one and let us know.
Also better if you install the Play store also so the updates are automatic.
Version name is changed GUID if comparing. Better than comparing version numbers.
GUI is non functional, just a visual representation of haptic feedback and actual randomness spread.
It's like drawing points in the whites of a poached egg. If you can see a pattern, you'll be rich in the stock market

Today I removed the app. The biggest problem is random reboots for me. As said, it has potential because sometimes apps started faster than ever on my ancient LG L3. But not consistently. So maybe I 'll try again later.
Sorry for my first post, probably tl;dr. I will repeat my most important question: can you provide us with separate scripts? I mean: I would like to test the entropy thing without the other tweaks as you described in the OP.

Dude!
You're probably using an old version. We'll never know. Will we? Will we now?
There's a small trick that borders on superstition. The famous random device block gremlin tends to disappear if you run the GUI in scribble mode. Basically what may be happening is the block is hit and then the stupid kernel makes whatever decision it makes. Usually at the cost of usability in favour of some stupid religious Linux fervour. Someone should report that to LINUX.
Or another entropy generator, haveged or RNGD or Seeder may be running. Which is a big no! Best to run it on stock ROMS or full custom ROMs ( please ask the developer if they're running any variant of above and to recommend coexistence or better variant of any subcomponents or piece of code. ). In other words, open source!
Also, the separate scripts are in the /bin directory on the phone itself. May require bash and ADB skills.
And full source on XDA and GitHub.
I'll construe this as a possible request to also post the shell scripts from GitHub into the XDA project as separate attachments. Which I can do. In due course
Cheers.

Well, I took it from Play Store. Is that an old version?

WireGuard Kernel/ROM Integration

WireGuard is a next generation secure VPN tunnel for the Linux kernel, with modern yet conservative cryptography and simple design principles. It is meant as a replacement for OpenVPN and for IPsec, and generally has better performance and security characteristics than both. It also is much easier to use. The whitepaper was peer reviewed for NDSS17 and the protocol itself has been formally verified. Since it lives in the kernel, it not only is very fast, but it is able to integrate in clever ways that are quite nice for battery life and overall smoothness. There are already commercial VPN providers offering services using WireGuard, and it is very easy to run your own WireGuard servers as well.
Not only is it free software, but WireGuard also comes with free stickers. Send me a DM with how many you want and to where I should send them, and I’ll drop an envelope in the box. (Do not request stickers on the mailing list.)
But WireGuard being awesome is old news. The new news is that now there’s an easy way to integrate it into Android kernels.
WireGuard runs on ordinary Android devices, but ones that have the special WireGuard kernel module will have numerous advantages. That is the topic of this thread. The main interest here in XDA Land is in making the kernelspace version readily available to kernel/ROM devs, which has the best possible performance, battery life, integration, and stability.
Adding to Kernel Trees
If you maintain your own kernel, you may easily patch your kernel tree to support WireGuard with the following commands:
Code:
$ curl https://data.zx2c4.com/wireguard-android-kernel-patcher.tar.xz | tar -xJf -
$ wireguard-android-kernel-patcher/doit.bash path/to/kerneltree
This will patch your kernel and create a commit or a series of commits for you.
Everybody: Download the App
The Android GUI app will opportunistically use the kernel component if it's available (patched in using either one of the two methods above), and will then fall back to the userspace implementation otherwise.
Getting Support
Ask or help on IRC in #wireguard on Freenode. DO NOT ASK FOR USER SUPPORT IN THIS THREAD. Devs only, please. User help is on the IRC channel.
XDA:DevDB Information
WireGuard, Kernel for all devices (see above for details)
Contributors
zx2c4
Source Code: https://www.wireguard.com/
Kernel Special Features: WireGuard kernel module integration
Version Information
Status: Release
Created 2017-11-28
Last Updated 2020-12-05

This post formerly had a list of an incredible amount of ROMs and kernels with WireGuard baked in. But by now, so many kernels have WireGuard that it became impossible to keep track of.
You can check if your current kernel has WireGuard by downloading the WireGuard app and looking at the settings panel. If it says "kernel backend", you have WireGuard in your kernel. If it says "userspace backend", you do not have WireGuard in your kernel.

Reserved

It is meant as a replacement for OpenVPN and for IPsec, and generally has better performance and security characteristics than both. It also is much easier to use.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Have you been in contact with devs behind DD-WRT, AsusWRT-Merlin, Tomato, etc. to help them integrate it into their router firmwares? I'm interested in the improved security, but it won't be easier than OpenVPN for a lot of people until it's baked into their router.

giltwist said:
Have you been in contact with devs behind DD-WRT, AsusWRT-Merlin, Tomato, etc. to help them integrate it into their router firmwares? I'm interested in the improved security, but it won't be easier than OpenVPN for a lot of people until it's baked into their router.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As far as router firmware goes, in addition to the ordinary Linux distros, it's also integrated into OpenWRT/LEDE and EdgeOS. I haven't talked to the DD, Merlin, and Tomato people yet though. That's a good suggestion.

I'm trying to add wireguard to my rom. (ViperOS for Land aka Redmi 3S).
Got this error
FAILED: patch-wireguard
/bin/bash -c "(ln -vsfT \"\$(realpath --relative-to=\"kernel/xiaomi/msm8937/net)\" \"kernel/wireguard/wireguard/src\")\" \"kernel/xiaomi/msm8937/net/wireguard\" ) && (grep -q wireguard \"kernel/xiaomi/msm8937/net/Makefile\" || sed -i \"/^obj-\\\\\\\$(CONFIG_NETFILTER).*+=/a obj-\\\$(CONFIG_WIREGUARD) += wireguard/\" \"kernel/xiaomi/msm8937/net/Makefile\" ) && (grep -q wireguard \"kernel/xiaomi/msm8937/net/Kconfig\" || sed -i \"/^if INET\\\$/a source \\\"net/wireguard/Kconfig\\\"\" \"kernel/xiaomi/msm8937/net/Kconfig\" )"
/bin/bash: realpath: command not found
ln: failed to create symbolic link ‘kernel/xiaomi/msm8937/net/wireguard’ -> ‘’: No such file or directory
Ful log here https://hastebin.com/tegecuzeke.tex

dineshthangavel47 said:
/bin/bash: realpath: command not found
ln: failed to create symbolic link ‘kernel/xiaomi/msm8937/net/wireguard’ -> ‘’: No such file or directory
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The issue is that you don't have `realpath(1)` installed. This is usually a standard part of every linux distribution, and comes in coreutils, since 2011.
In case you're using some ancient distro, I've added a workaround:
https://git.zx2c4.com/android_kernel_wireguard/commit/?id=3736a04ff5cf00d5d07e3e9f33438fbf83dc2401
Try `repo sync` and then see if things work for you.

It will be interesting to see how this goes.

zx2c4 said:
As far as router firmware goes, in addition to the ordinary Linux distros, it's also integrated into OpenWRT/LEDE and EdgeOS. I haven't talked to the DD, Merlin, and Tomato people yet though. That's a good suggestion.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think it might be impossible on some due to old kernel. On my Asus RT-AC68U running the latest AsustWRT-Merlin build, the kernel is: Linux version 2.6.36.4brcmarm ([email protected]) (gcc version 4.5.3 (Buildroot 2012.02) )

Skello said:
I think it might be impossible on some due to old kernel. On my Asus RT-AC68U running the latest AsustWRT-Merlin build, the kernel is: Linux version 2.6.36.4brcmarm ([email protected]) (gcc version 4.5.3 (Buildroot 2012.02) )
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Indeed some devices have simply too old kernels, but many other devices have kernels ≥3.10, which is from 2013.

zx2c4 said:
The issue is that you don't have `realpath(1)` installed. This is usually a standard part of every linux distribution, and comes in coreutils, since 2011.
In case you're using some ancient distro, I've added a workaround:
https://git.zx2c4.com/android_kernel_wireguard/commit/?id=3736a04ff5cf00d5d07e3e9f33438fbf83dc2401
Try `repo sync` and then see if things work for you.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks. Will try and report.

dineshthangavel47 said:
Thanks. Will try and report.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
By the way, usually the best way to debug things and work out problems is the #wireguard channel on Freenode, where we can exchange in real time. Feel free to poke us there.

Hi,
Nice! Although this is complete Chinese for me i will test laters today. I signed up for the beta on Play and i am a Mullvad user which has Wireguard servers (experimental though). I will try later today and report back if i could get it working. Hopefully its not too soon for this question: will it in future be possible to exclude app from VPN usage. I had problems before with: my banking apps didn't like exotic ip adresses. English is not my native language but as i understand correctly: it can work without a kernel who has this implemented, right?

Droidphilev said:
Hi,
Nice! Although this is complete Chinese for me i will test laters today. I signed up for the beta on Play and i am a Mullvad user which has Wireguard servers (experimental though). I will try later today and report back if i could get it working. Hopefully its not too soon for this question: will it in future be possible to exclude app from VPN usage. I had problems before with: my banking apps didn't like exotic ip adresses. English is not my native language but as i understand correctly: it can work without a kernel who has this implemented, right?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If your kernel doesn't have the WireGuard implementation... You can't use it.

dineshthangavel47 said:
If your kernel doesn't have the WireGuard implementation... You can't use it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok thanks,
i was refering to this:
"Work continues on making a userspace version of WireGuard that will allow folks to run on normal ROMs without kernel support. This is coming along nicely..."
and this:
"The Android GUI app, which is currently in development, will opportunistically use the kernel component if it's available, and will then fall back to the userspace implementation otherwise. "
So you mean it's not possible *yet*? There's no use for me to start testing if it's not implemented yet of course

Droidphilev said:
Ok thanks,
i was refering to this:
"Work continues on making a userspace version of WireGuard that will allow folks to run on normal ROMs without kernel support. This is coming along nicely..."
and this:
"The Android GUI app, which is currently in development, will opportunistically use the kernel component if it's available, and will then fall back to the userspace implementation otherwise. "
So you mean it's not possible *yet*? There's no use for me to start testing if it's not implemented yet of course
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
User space implementation is not complete yet. I guess...

dineshthangavel47 said:
User space implementation is not complete yet. I guess...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Your guess was right my friend. After trying to enable the app i get a warning that, for now, a patched kernel is needed. Thanks for your help!

Hi
Using this on my linux laptop and it seems to work great. however I cant seem to to get it to work on my phone. its sultaanXDA linage for 1+3t and it is supported. I would really like a noob friendly setup guide for the android GUI app. Im using azireVPN

andersjohansson81 said:
Hi
Using this on my linux laptop and it seems to work great. however I cant seem to to get it to work on my phone. its sultaanXDA linage for 1+3t and it is supported. I would really like a noob friendly setup guide for the android GUI app. Im using azireVPN
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes. Sultan's OP3T image is supported.

christantoan said:
Try running this script with "sh script-name.sh" (as root probably) and you should get several configuration files in sdcard/Download/wireguard that you can import in the app. I'm not azireVPN user so I'm not sure this will work but I have tried the same trick (all I change is where the script save the downloaded config files) with Mullvad VPN with success.
Anyway, does anyone know how to allow local network traffic when using Wireguard (or it depends on the config file)? I cannot access local network resources when it's active. Thank you.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Funny, I made essentially the same modification to the script too, for the purposes of making new configs for my phone. You might want to remove the `exec sudo` line at the top, now that it doesn't actually need root. Other than that, the modification looks good.
Local network access is permitted by the default wg-quick(8) stuff on ordinary Linux. But it looks like there might be some special things needed with ndc on Android for pass through. I'll have to look into this. Thanks for the suggestion.