Related
I'm really thrilled with what's been accomplished so far. Without benefit of source we have a nice handfull of ROMS including a mostly working AOKP and CM9.
What we're lacking is ROOT on the now shipping 1.85. This means that fewer and fewer users will be able to install your amazing work as phones get replaced for warranty issues and new owners come to XDA looking to improve their devices.
I've started a bounty thread http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1699379 and the bounty is at $370 and climbing.
Please help.
Please devs this is a on the knees,begging,and almost shaking lol plea for root .
And as am I pleased with all that's been done so if ya can please help us out
Sent from my HTC One X using xda premium
I'm almost 100% sure someone is working on it somewhere.. all we need is an update!
Not trying to be a **** but I don't think begging for root will make it come any faster. This is kind of spamming the development section and you already have a bounty thread in general.
t0mmy said:
Not trying to be a **** but I don't think begging for root will make it come any faster. This is kind of spamming the development section and you already have a bounty thread in general.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I was more alerting devs who don't look at general that there's a bounty
/shrug
Yea theres nothing wrong with this at all. Spamming would be making several threads .
Sent from my HTC One X
"[BOUNTY] Root for 1.85" would be a more appropriate thread name.
thedauntlessone said:
"[BOUNTY] Root for 1.85" would be a more appropriate thread name.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
and that's the name of the bounty thread in General.
tyshemi said:
Yea theres nothing wrong with this at all. Spamming would be making several threads .
Sent from my HTC One X
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The development section is for releasing roms/tools/mods and collaborating on things that require development such as s-off/root. Maybe if OP started this thread as a thinktank thread and posted things he has tried already/ideas he has to obtain root on 1.85 then it would be appropriate here, otherwise it should be in general (where there are plenty of threads that talk about this already).
And you've contributed? Yea I think that if its an issue gunny will.be contacted by a mod. But thanks ?
And this is a step forward without root for newcomers this could get bad for all of us . So in theory this is a project for development and is some of us contributing time and money to better the community ,not just ranting and "spamming"
Sent from my HTC One X
t0mmy said:
The development section is for releasing roms/tools/mods and collaborating on things that require development such as s-off/root. Maybe if OP started this thread as a thinktank thread and posted things he has tried already/ideas he has to obtain root on 1.85 then it would be appropriate here, otherwise it should be in general (where there are plenty of threads that talk about this already).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
are you a moderator? report this thread to the mods and let them decide if it bothers you so much.
Yes I know what DEV is for. I believe that we have a special case and exigent circumstances here and spreading the word to the forum that DEVS actually look at makes sense yes?
gunnyman said:
are you a moderator? report this thread to the mods and let them decide if it bothers you so much.
Yes I know what DEV is for. I believe that we have a special case and exigent circumstances here and spreading the word to the forum that DEVS actually look at makes sense yes?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You actually think no one is trying to achieve root on 1.85 right now ?
That's not the point man there has been no updates and Nobody is confirming anything. We started a nice bounty almost 400 bucks and no reply and no word at all
Sent from my HTC One X
t0mmy said:
You actually think no one is trying to achieve root on 1.85 right now ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
what reason do I have to believe otherwise? Other than jcase, whom I've provided some data he requested nobody else is discussing it.
Gunny I appreciate the effort you put in on general and this thread. Your right about alerting the devs bc the probably never go to general. Keep it up hopefully we'll get root sooner then later. We're on the same boat
Sent from my HTC One X using XDA
I appreciate this thread as well, because chances are, developers rarely head over to the general forums for this device.
Anyway, at this point I think root is probably in the works with some developers, but on the down-low.
If any developers would be willing to at least give us a status update, a thread like this wouldn't be necessary. But until then, this thread is definitely a good idea.
Also, add me to the bounty for $10.
danstheman7 said:
I appreciate this thread as well, because chances are, developers rarely head over to the general forums for this device.
Anyway, at this point I think root is probably in the works with some developers, but on the down-low.
If any developers would be willing to at least give us a status update, a thread like this wouldn't be necessary. But until then, this thread is definitely a good idea.
Also, add me to the bounty for $10.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Please add to the bounty in the bounty thread. Thanks.
These guys spend hundreds of hours crawling through code. Honestly you think no one is aware of the problem and risking divorce trying to crack it.... Get a grip its a damn phone it will be out when its out.
Sent from my HTC One XL using xda premium
Grnfinger said:
These guys spend hundreds of hours crawling through code. Honestly you think no one is aware of the problem and risking divorce trying to crack it.... Get a grip its a damn phone it will be out when its out.
Sent from my HTC One XL using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wow you're a great edition to the community :banghead: troll elsewhere please
Sent from my HTC One X
tyshemi said:
Wow you're a great edition to the community :banghead: troll elsewhere please
Sent from my HTC One X
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I was thinking the same thing. I think some people just reiterate what they see other people say to get the same attention.
Sent from my HTC One X using XDA
http://www.phonearena.com/news/Sams...droid-flagship-4-million-in-five-days_id43038
Not every piece of new information needs its own thread. Post this kind of stuff here
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=41426892#post41426892
Or find a thread that is similar and post it there. This is a pointless thread.
MrGriffdude said:
Not every piece of new information needs its own thread. Post this kind of stuff here
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=41426892#post41426892
Or find a thread that is similar and post it there. This is a pointless thread.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Then report it and leave.
Whoah... I figured the S4 would take awhile to catch up with the S3. I was wrong. And it's a totally huge difference!
Samsung [sold] 4 million of the [S4] in just five days.
The S III took 21 days to sell the first three million
The S II took 55 days and the original Galaxy S sold the first three million in 85 days.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
CZ Eddie said:
Whoah... I figured the S4 would take awhile to catch up with the S3. I was wrong. And it's a totally huge difference!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Indeed. When you have momentum you build upon it and use it to get even further.
MrGriffdude said:
Not every piece of new information needs its own thread. Post this kind of stuff here
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=41426892#post41426892
Or find a thread that is similar and post it there. This is a pointless thread.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You know what we don't need? You commenting on every single thread about how you don't like the thread. Elsewhere, you said you're quitting this forum. When? We're all waiting.
Good job Samsung. The S4 was quite the hyped phone and Samsung delivered.
I'm not all that surprised with how far samsung has come over its competitors
this is a weird thread anyways gotta go
yeahmann said:
You know what we don't need? You commenting on every single thread about how you don't like the thread. Elsewhere, you said you're quitting this forum. When? We're all waiting.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Directing him to the off topic where this stuff should be
When you give people what they want, they will buy it.....
MrGriffdude said:
Not every piece of new information needs its own thread. Post this kind of stuff here
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=41426892#post41426892
Or find a thread that is similar and post it there. This is a pointless thread.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I rest my case. Here you are again with the same comment in another thread.
SkizzMcNizz you two timing us?
gunnyman said:
SkizzMcNizz you two timing us?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Noo. Just came to see if that Google Edition S4 was real or not then I saw this clown making the same comments across multiple threads so obviously I had to say something lol.
Edit: I actually did exchange the One for the S4 and then went back to the One because of the lag and locked bootloader of the S4. I may still get the S4 tho once the bootloader unlocked is released, if it hasn't been patched yet.
Deleted comment.
MrGriffdude said:
Im not allowed to try and direct people to the off topic on this cluttered forum? Your pretty freaking rude dude I never claimed to not be doing this.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I apologize for calling you a clown. Maybe that was over the top =)
SkizzMcNizz said:
I apologize for calling you a clown. Maybe that was over the top =)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Trying to get actual information on here is like trying to decipher a codex. You have migrate through all the useless posts its aggravating to say the least. Btw Clowns are terrifying. I could never be one, an idiot yes but never a clown.
Shipped not sold. There's a big difference.
barondebxl said:
http://www.phonearena.com/news/Sams...droid-flagship-4-million-in-five-days_id43038
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok so first off, sorry if this is in the wrong section, please correct me as im kinda new. Also, I have searched the thread and couldnt find anything on this but if this is a double post, im sorry.
Now as of right now, the galaxy s4 google edition is still just a rumor. If it turns out to be real, and the hardware is the same as the att version, is there any way we could get the odin image, decompile it, put the att modem and bootloader in, then flash it? Would it work?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I337 using xda app-developers app
xZip- said:
Ok so first off, sorry if this is in the wrong section, please correct me as im kinda new. Also, I have searched the thread and couldnt find anything on this but if this is a double post, im sorry.
Now as of right now, the galaxy s4 google edition is still just a rumor. If it turns out to be real, and the hardware is the same as the att version, is there any way we could get the odin image, decompile it, put the att modem and bootloader in, then flash it? Would it work?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I337 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why not post this in here, or at least read the thread because it is already being discussed? At the time I am posting this, this thread is literally 2 posts above.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2279127
scott14719 said:
Why not post this in here, or at least read the thread because it is already being discussed? At the time I am posting this, this thread is literally 2 posts above.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2279127
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah I saw this but it didnt exactly duscuss what im trying to here. What I would loke to know is if we could get the odin image and port it to the att version without having to unlock the bootloader or anything. Just flash it through odin as if it were a stock image.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I337 using xda app-developers app
Yeah in that other thread, they are linking to the definition on "****!" needless to say it's way off topic. I too am wondering the same. Being that there are no hardware differences, I don't see it being a problem to share Roms. It's already gonna support AT&T and T Mobile frequencies, so I think it will be a share great between the different models!
Sent from my Galaxy S 4!
Well we are in the att galaxy s4 forum so why wouldnt we all be on the same topic? Its already annouced it will support att bands so no need for modifying
j510 said:
Well we are in the att galaxy s4 forum so why wouldnt we all be on the same topic? Its already annouced it will support att bands so no need for modifying
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
He's talking about using the information to unlock the bootloader for the SGS4 ATT version.
I think we'll just have to sit tight and see what the developers dig up and figure out.
xZip- said:
Ok so first off, sorry if this is in the wrong section, please correct me as im kinda new. Also, I have searched the thread and couldnt find anything on this but if this is a double post, im sorry.
Now as of right now, the galaxy s4 google edition is still just a rumor. If it turns out to be real, and the hardware is the same as the att version, is there any way we could get the odin image, decompile it, put the att modem and bootloader in, then flash it? Would it work?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I337 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
To be honest, it all depends on which bootloader the Google version comes with. AT&T bootloader is locked but T-Mobile is unlocked. Now I don't know a lot about bootloaders so please correct me, but if the Google version comes unlocked, it would most likely be the same as the T-Mobile one. I know for a fact using a T-Mobile stock ROM through ODIN on an AT&T S4 does not work. So until the bootloader is unlocked you won't be able to flash the Google stock ROM.
Supporting both AT&T and T-Mobile networks simply means it will work on both frequencies of LTE service. This has nothing to do with the bootloader because unlocking the phone from AT&T doesn't unlock the bootloader but the phone will work on the T-Mobile network.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I337 using xda premium
---------- Post added at 01:04 AM ---------- Previous post was at 12:59 AM ----------
SlimJ87D said:
He's talking about using the information to unlock the bootloader for the SGS4 ATT version.
I think we'll just have to sit tight and see what the developers dig up and figure out.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
He specifically said using the AT&T bootloader. I don't think he's trying to unlock the bootloader this way, I just think he's trying to run stock Android using the same technique for getting out of a recovery loop (flashing stock ROM through ODIN). Without an unlocked bootloader this won't be possible because the ROM won't flash.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I337 using xda premium
Unbelievable. why are we doing this? there are many threads on this...PLEASE PEOPLE! If you are new, I understand, but it is not hard to scroll down a few pages and see same topics that you can input your opinions. The G4 forums are not HUGE yet, real easy, just look.
I'll say it again before someone else has too, NO IT WILL NOT UNLOCK THE BOOTLOADER! Bootloader encryption is deep and the kernel must be signed by AT&T in order to load. The Google GS4 is OBVIOUSLY NOT going to have the same bootloader since they are not AT&T, simple as that. Flash your GS4 with a Google ROM and Kernel and you will be bricked and or it just won't even flash.
NOW PLEASE STOP ASKING!
Jesus people, he's asking about the possibility of converting our phones into the Google Edition with an Odin flash. Where the hell did this get misconstrued as asking if it will unlock his bootloader? Take a couple benadryl and get off the computer for an hour. The guy just wants stock aosp on his phone, like many of us wouldn't mind having.
Sent from my Galaxy S4 using Tapatalk 2
TheAxman said:
Unbelievable. why are we doing this? there are many threads on this...PLEASE PEOPLE! If you are new, I understand, but it is not hard to scroll down a few pages and see same topics that you can input your opinions. The G4 forums are not HUGE yet, real easy, just look.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You need to calm down. Plain and simple. The other threads are talking about unlocking the bootloader, this one is not. He simply asked about flashing AOSP on an AT&T phone with the original bootloader.
Thermalwolf said:
I'll say it again before someone else has too, NO IT WILL NOT UNLOCK THE BOOTLOADER! Bootloader encryption is deep and the kernel must be signed by AT&T in order to load. The Google GS4 is OBVIOUSLY NOT going to have the same bootloader since they are not AT&T, simple as that. Flash your GS4 with a Google ROM and Kernel and you will be bricked and or it just won't even flash.
NOW PLEASE STOP ASKING!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Same as above. Calm down. How about you actually read the damn post instead of seeing the word bootloader and crying about it. NOTHING in the original post was about unlocking the bootloader. He wanted to flash AOSP and IF you would have read my reply you would have known this.
I'm so sick of pompous people on this forum already and I've only been a member for 2 days. READ the question. Answer it. Stop being pricks about it especially when you're flipping out about something not even asked.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I337 using xda premium
I think everyone is just having rom flashing withdrawls..
Wooosaa everyone.. Wooosaa
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I337 using Tapatalk 2
Nitroglycerin said:
You need to calm down. Plain and simple. The other threads are talking about unlocking the bootloader, this one is not. He simply asked about flashing AOSP on an AT&T phone with the original bootloader.
Same as above. Calm down. How about you actually read the damn post instead of seeing the word bootloader and crying about it. NOTHING in the original post was about unlocking the bootloader. He wanted to flash AOSP and IF you would have read my reply you would have known this.
I'm so sick of pompous people on this forum already and I've only been a member for 2 days. READ the question. Answer it. Stop being pricks about it especially when you're flipping out about something not even asked.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I337 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm sorry I thought the OP was more intelligent then that and thought it was implied given you can't flash the ROM without an unlocked bootloader. Maybe YOU need to chill and stop being pompous. You've been a member for two days, I've been a member for two years.
I hate to be a **** but the forum has been flooded with the same questions over and over without any thought or care of trying to search for answers other then for themselves. It needs to stop, enabling it is not helping the situation.
Nitroglycerin said:
I'm so sick of pompous people on this forum already and I've only been a member for 2 days. READ the question. Answer it. Stop being pricks about it especially when you're flipping out about something not even asked.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I337 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have better idea how about just search for your own answers instead of posting and then you won't have to deal with the pompous pricks.
Thermalwolf said:
I'm sorry I thought the OP was more intelligent then that and thought it was implied given you can't flash the ROM without a locked bootloader. Maybe YOU need to chill and stop being pompous. You've been a member for two days, I've been a member for two years.
I hate to be a **** but the forum has been flooded with the same questions over and over without any thought or care of trying to search for answers other then for themselves. It needs to stop, enabling it is not helping the situation.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You "thought the OP was more intelligent," however you must have decidedly skip on reading the FIRST sentence in the post where he is apologizing if its in the wrong section and that he is "new here." Your assumptions led you down the path to what Nitro posted and fairly gave me the same impression (without the name calling). Either way, its cleared up now. Lets just move on.
robstunner said:
You "thought the OP was more intelligent," however you must have decidedly skip on reading the FIRST sentence in the post where he is apologizing if its in the wrong section and that he is "new here." Your assumptions led you down the path to what Nitro posted and fairly gave me the same impression (without the name calling). Either way, its cleared up now. Lets just move on.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well I was still trying to answer OP but I didn't realize I didn't reply properly. I was also freaking on Nitro for even bringing up the bootloader as well. Either way I'm done then, I'll move on if everyone else will
Thermalwolf said:
I'm sorry I thought the OP was more intelligent then that and thought it was implied given you can't flash the ROM without an unlocked bootloader. Maybe YOU need to chill and stop being pompous. You've been a member for two days, I've been a member for two years.
I hate to be a **** but the forum has been flooded with the same questions over and over without any thought or care of trying to search for answers other then for themselves. It needs to stop, enabling it is not helping the situation.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hes not talking about flashing roms you tool.
Hes talking about using odin and using the google s4 files instead of the att s4 file. Not that hard of a concept to get nor is it necessary to rage over.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I337 using Tapatalk 2
Thermalwolf said:
You've been a member for two days, I've been a member for two years.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Friendly reminder: being here for 2 years doesn't give you the right to be a **** to a new user when he wasn't even asking about what you posted. That being said, I'm not posting this to continue the argument. You said you'd be done and so will I. However, just to clarify, I only brought up the bootloader to explain that flashing AOSP won't work and explained why.
MrGriffdude said:
I have better idea how about just search for your own answers instead of posting and then you won't have to deal with the pompous pricks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Normally I do, but since I provided an answer, I couldn't search for it lol
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I337 using xda premium
Nitroglycerin said:
I'm so sick of pompous people on this forum already and I've only been a member for 2 days.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I337 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
When I was brand new here, I sorta thought the same way. The things is though, I read every single thread and post about my phone. I didn't ask a question that was already answered ten times over. That's where noobs go wrong. They don't read. They're (often times) too lazy to do any of their own foot-work to try and solve their problem or answer their question. It's not so much people being pompous as it's devs and members are just tired of the same old thing over and over again. This has been going on long before I was a member.
There was a dev that made ROMs for my old phone. They were my favorite! You know what happened? That dev got tired of people posting the same questions and flooding his inbox with the same crap. So, because of lazy people, myself and everyone else that used his ROMs suffered. That's when I stopped caring about how some people respond to others. Spend a few years here and I think you'll have a better understanding of that.
RAID Xero said:
When I was brand new here, I sorta thought the same way. The things is though, I read every single thread and post about my phone. I didn't ask a question that was already answered ten times over. That's where noobs go wrong. They don't read. They're (often times) too lazy to do any of their own foot-work to try and solve their problem or answer their question. It's not so much people being pompous as it's devs and members are just tired of the same old thing over and over again. This has been going on long before I was a member.
There was a dev that made ROMs for my old phone. They were my favorite! You know what happened? That dev got tired of people posting the same questions and flooding his inbox with the same crap. So, because of lazy people, myself and everyone else that used his ROMs suffered. That's when I stopped caring about how some people respond to others. Spend a few years here and I think you'll have a better understanding of that.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There's a difference between someone starting a new thread and people flooding one particular dev. Besides, the issue here was unique (and apparently some "experienced" people still aren't grokking why).
People do need to chill out about this sort of thing. Besides, the search function is kind of ****ty and is not working half the time, so cut people some slack if there's some overlap. It's not going to hurt you.
I just got my Note 5 this afternoon, not a single one of my credit or debit cards will work with Samsung Pay and since I am with USAA it may be a while before it does, as such the itch to root is even stronger now.
Has the latest OTA been rooted yet? I am currently still on 5.1.1 but I am getting the notification for an update.
Would it be wise to update or should I wait a bit longer?
In other words has unlock and root been achieved on the newest OTA yet?
flyingwolf said:
I just got my Note 5 this afternoon, not a single one of my credit or debit cards will work with Samsung Pay and since I am with USAA it may be a while before it does, as such the itch to root is even stronger now.
Has the latest OTA been rooted yet? I am currently still on 5.1.1 but I am getting the notification for an update.
Would it be wise to update or should I wait a bit longer?
In other words has unlock and root been achieved on the newest OTA yet?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Please browse the forum. Your answers are literally a click away. Heck you can even Google "root tmobile note 5," and it'll bring you right back to xda.
Sent from my SM-N920T using Tapatalk
Jammol said:
Please browse the forum. Your answers are literally a click away. Heck you can even Google "root tmobile note 5," and it'll bring you right back to xda.
Sent from my SM-N920T using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I didn't ask if it could be rooted.
I asked if MM had been rooted or if it was only LP at this time, as all I see in the development forum are 5.1.1 roms and kernels.
This is why I asked the question the way I did.
There is a very good reason that XDA has the reputation of being a bad place to go if you have questions, and your response is part of that problem.
The Q&A forum is for precisely these style questions.
Now, seeing as how I did not ask how to root the device as there are plenty of threads on that, would you care to take a stab at answering my actual question.
I won't be mad at a link to a thread which answers the question I asked.
Just do this
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=3187422
Looks like this when done right
And again, note that the link and the screenshot is for LP, I am asking if MM has been rooted yet.
Though I do very much appreciate the response.
flyingwolf said:
And again, note that the link and the screenshot is for LP, I am asking if MM has been rooted yet.
Though I do very much appreciate the response.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
First of all you never stated anything about mm in your original post. Secondly note 5 is still on lp. The only thing you stated is if the latest Ota has been rooted, and the latest Ota is lp and yes it has been rooted so there is your answer.
Sent from my SM-G920T using Tapatalk
Reading my post again you are 100% right, I apologize.
Thank you.
flyingwolf said:
I didn't ask if it could be rooted.
I asked if MM had been rooted or if it was only LP at this time, as all I see in the development forum are 5.1.1 roms and kernels.
This is why I asked the question the way I did.
There is a very good reason that XDA has the reputation of being a bad place to go if you have questions, and your response is part of that problem.
The Q&A forum is for precisely these style questions.
Now, seeing as how I did not ask how to root the device as there are plenty of threads on that, would you care to take a stab at answering my actual question.
I won't be mad at a link to a thread which answers the question I asked.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Its all good. I won't go there with this one. The back and forth isn't worth it. You should also probably edit your post!
MM Beta is rootable. Go to the development section to find out the pros and cons of using the beta. I advise you to stay on LP. There's only the stock rooted beta kernel available for MM. There's a lot of cons to being on it, so please keep that in mind is you decide to flash it.
See how much help I still gave you without actually posting a link? Not trying to be a **** but if we soon feed the work, the work wouldn't know how to feed itself. I started off as the wise noob ever, and bricked phones. If I had only taken the time to Google and research, those devices being bricked could have been avoided.
Sent from my SM-N920T using Tapatalk
Jammol said:
Its all good. I won't go there with this one. The back and forth isn't worth it. You should also probably edit your post!
MM Beta is rootable. Go to the development section to find out the pros and cons of using the beta. I advise you to stay on LP. There's only the stock rooted beta kernel available for MM. There's a lot of cons to being on it, so please keep that in mind is you decide to flash it.
See how much help I still gave you without actually posting a link? Not trying to be a **** but if we soon feed the work, the work wouldn't know how to feed itself. I started off as the wise noob ever, and bricked phones. If I had only taken the time to Google and research, those devices being bricked could have been avoided.
Sent from my SM-N920T using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Jammol,
I realise in my first post I did not give names as I had thought I had. This is why upon re-reading it I apologized as my original question wasn't clear.
Thank you for the follow up.
In any question thread the answer should be clear, even if it is simply a link to another post, in this way those coming here in the future can follow the link rather than seeing a simple "nevermind I figured it out" and my post being the only response to their search. Please note, I did not say you had to provide a link, just said that even if your answer was simply a link to where I could find the answer that would be fine as well.
Note I did search, but as I was looking for MM ROMS I could not find anything, I was under the mistaken impression that MM was on the device. This is where I erred and why I could not find anymore information.
For all future folks taking a look at this thread, as of today MM is not available on the Note5 and the newest OTA (as of today) has already been rooted and you can find a number of ROMS in the development section.
flyingwolf said:
Jammol,
I realise in my first post I did not give names as I had thought I had. This is why upon re-reading it I apologized as my original question wasn't clear.
Thank you for the follow up.
In any question thread the answer should be clear, even if it is simply a link to another post, in this way those coming here in the future can follow the link rather than seeing a simple "nevermind I figured it out" and my post being the only response to their search. Please note, I did not say you had to provide a link, just said that even if your answer was simply a link to where I could find the answer that would be fine as well.
Note I did search, but as I was looking for MM ROMS I could not find anything, I was under the mistaken impression that MM was on the device. This is where I erred and why I could not find anymore information.
For all future folks taking a look at this thread, as of today MM is not available on the Note5 and the newest OTA (as of today) has already been rooted and you can find a number of ROMS in the development section.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's okay.
Sent from my SM-N920T using Tapatalk
flyingwolf said:
Jammol,
I realise in my first post I did not give names as I had thought I had. This is why upon re-reading it I apologized as my original question wasn't clear.
Thank you for the follow up.
In any question thread the answer should be clear, even if it is simply a link to another post, in this way those coming here in the future can follow the link rather than seeing a simple "nevermind I figured it out" and my post being the only response to their search. Please note, I did not say you had to provide a link, just said that even if your answer was simply a link to where I could find the answer that would be fine as well.
Note I did search, but as I was looking for MM ROMS I could not find anything, I was under the mistaken impression that MM was on the device. This is where I erred and why I could not find anymore information.
For all future folks taking a look at this thread, as of today MM is not available on the Note5 and the newest OTA (as of today) has already been rooted and you can find a number of ROMS in the development section.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Damn, you came off as really stabdoffish and a bit entitled, like everyone here owes you their time searching for a subject you could easily have searched for yourself. Smh
Thanat0s24 said:
Damn, you came off as really stabdoffish and a bit entitled, like everyone here owes you their time searching for a subject you could easily have searched for yourself. Smh
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Honest question for you.
After reading the thread, seeing where I had apologized and seeing that the issues was solved and the back and forth was done, what compelled you to respond in such a negative manner?
You end your statement with "smh" which I can only assume stands for "so much hate" as it is currently used.
So why bother? You see the thread is resolved, you see the question has been answered but then you just felt this need to respond?
flyingwolf said:
Honest question for you.
After reading the thread, seeing where I had apologized and seeing that the issues was solved and the back and forth was done, what compelled you to respond in such a negative manner?
You end your statement with "smh" which I can only assume stands for "so much hate" as it is currently used.
So why bother? You see the thread is resolved, you see the question has been answered but then you just felt this need to respond?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Smh means shaking my head. And it doesn't matter if it was resolved, you got all upset that none of us took the time to GOOGLE or FORUM SEARCH for you, when you could have easily done that yourself. The sense of entitlement was pretty thick.
And again, if you had actually bothered to read I state that I did search but was under the mistaken impression that this phone had an update to MM when it had not, hence the reason I could not find anything when searching for MM ROM's, this is why I asked.
So your assertion, especially after I had already stated I did, that I didn't search is completely unfounded.
The issue I took was with a response that boiled down to "do your own research as this help forum isn't here to help you".
This is an issue at XDA and why XDA is universally made fun of and considered a bad place to go if you have questions that haven't been answered, because a bunch of folks will respond with vitriol without bothering to read the rest of the posts.
For instance, the best answer was already given, but it would have hurt nothing for Jamool to have said:
"The latest OTA update is currently LP and that has been rooted, you can find multiple roms in the development section of the forum, here is a link (link). And in the future make sure to make use of that search button."
At which point I would have realised that I was mistaken on the idea that the Note5 has Marshmallow already and that would have been the end of the conversation.
Now, can we consider this matter closed otr would you like to once again respond and tell me how I didn't bother to search?
P.S. I cannot be the only one that has noticed that the search function seems to stop working at 11pm EST am I?
flyingwolf said:
I just got my Note 5 this afternoon, not a single one of my credit or debit cards will work with Samsung Pay and since I am with USAA it may be a while before it does, as such the itch to root is even stronger now.
Has the latest OTA been rooted yet? I am currently still on 5.1.1 but I am getting the notification for an update.
Would it be wise to update or should I wait a bit longer?
In other words has unlock and root been achieved on the newest OTA yet?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Where you on N920TUVS2COKC when you got it? If so how did you root it. I got mines today & dont see any updates available. Also the space kernel has been pulled.
............ junk . deleted
I did google, and as I said already. I was wrong.
I guess you really don't bother to read previous posts.
How dare I post a question in a question and answer forum specific to my question.
Spider_Pig27 said:
Where you on N920TUVS2COKC when you got it? If so how did you root it. I got mines today & dont see any updates available. Also the space kernel has been pulled.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I haven't rooted yet, I am holding out hope that usaa gets Samsung pay setup soon.
I was having a bad day , then I read this.
I was wondering if anyone knew any good sites to go to to get my OnePlus unlocked. It's currently locked to TMobile and it's been hell getting it unlocked. I'm new to here and saw a few posts of people that knew ways to do it. Thanks
Ryebrolol said:
I was wondering if anyone knew any good sites to go to to get my OnePlus unlocked. It's currently locked to TMobile and it's been hell getting it unlocked. I'm new to here and saw a few posts of people that knew ways to do it. Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thread probably best suited in a different section, but anyway, have a look here and see how you get on.
https://forum.xda-developers.com/on...-unlock-sim-t-mobile-users-heres-how-t3935327
hallo dare said:
Thread probably best suited in a different section, but anyway, have a look here and see how you get on.
https://forum.xda-developers.com/on...-unlock-sim-t-mobile-users-heres-how-t3935327
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks, I'm still learning my way around here.
Welcome aboard! Cheers